I received this email from a member of Pegida Canada, a group working for human rights against jihad terror and Sharia oppression, and opposing mass Muslim migration into Canada. Personal details have been removed, as the woman who was sued does not want to give her name. She has to pay out over $11,000 to this man who continually harassed foes of jihad terror at rallies. He works in tandem with Antifa and pro- “Palestinian” groups. Pegida Canada adds: “We have had Israeli flags torn out of our hands by these people. The police have given less and less protection. One of our people was punched to the ground, another was knocked unconscious. The police watch from a distance.”
This is the Canada of Islamophobia Motion M-103, Justin Trudeau’s Canada.
Today was a dark day in the face of justice. A supporter who stands for freedom and truth was handed a ruling in small claims court for defamation of a Muslim counter protester.
Background:
On July 22, 2017, Pegida Canada held a rally in London, Ontario, our first public rally since 2015. Previously, we had rallied privately, with information going out by word of mouth to trusted individuals. The reason for this is at our rally in 2015 in Toronto, Antifa became very threatening and violent, destroying some of our equipment and threatening the people present at the rally. The police did not take our warning seriously that they would cause problems, and as a result, this group was allowed to get within five feet of us. We were made to disband by the police, as they couldn’t guarantee our safety.
So we rallied privately until 2017. At this point, at a private demo in London, the police came by to talk to us because someone called them about our activities. They advised us to advertise our rally, as they then could be ‘prepared’.
We followed their advisement. July 22, 2017, we held a public rally. We were countered by a large group of people, many of them hostile, including the plaintive in the above court case. At that rally, he pulled his zipper down, made suggestive movements with his hands, and told the women he would give them .25 and that they would be his bitches. He also spewed out spittle as he was ranting at one of our supporters. He was foul-mouthed and harassed us continually. As a result, one of the supporters tweeted this information out (the spit, the zipper etc., calling him a pig).
He sued for defamation, claiming he had lost his job because of the tweet. The tweet was up for eight days. He did not lose his job because of the tweet; they fired him because he was not producing. He lost no income. The judge decided that a defamation suit was applicable because our supporter had tweeted that he spat. He lied about losing his job, he lied about his attendance at the rally, he lied about pulling his zipper down, yet the judge awarded him a significant amount of money because we didn’t have sufficient testimony that he spat at someone. He lied about most of his testimony, yet the judge awarded him money.
The judge said he did not want to bring politics into the case, yet he alluded to the fact that this man was a Muslim, and that my supporter had issues with Muslims. Non-political judgement indeed.
This man has attended many of our rallies since this one, continually harasses us, and has made the sign of money towards our supporter at one rally before the case. All of this evidence was given to the judge, yet he still awarded this man money.
Here is some background info of the incident:
Defendant’s statement
“We were well into our Rally when ______ for some reason decided to verbally attack one of our security. I was standing to the right of her. He was yelling in her face that she was a racist. The more he yelled at her, the closer he got to her in a threatening manner. I stayed with her out of fear he was going to hit or push her, he was that angry. As he was yelling, the spit was flying out of his mouth. During this verbal assault neither one of said anything until he spit on her, when I said, “You spit on her, you pig”. He continued to yell at her and me, saying we were racist. _______ then said he would pay me a quarter and make me his bitch, then he said he would pay all the women there to be his bitches, then he pulled his zipper down and I got a picture of it.
He showed up again at another Rally where I felt intimidated, harassed and threatened by him due to the hand gestures, indicating he was going to get money from me. By that point, he had notified me that he was suing me.”
This man is anti-Semitic, has posted numerous things on his Facebook page against Israel, and became enraged at one of my supporters for wearing an Israeli hat and holding an Israeli flag. Numerous photos and videos were given to the courts about his less than savoury person, yet he was awarded money because my supporter said he spit.
Kabulak Habash says
His family court documents definitely tell a VERY different story in regards to his financials and job, and prove that his claims of job loss and income loss surrounding the time of these events were absolute LIES…. sadly, we have a legal system, NOT a justice system.
Terry Gain says
This is very upsetting. It is another example of Muslim privilege, probably motivated by fear of Muslim violence. I think one lesson is to have several people videotaping rallies.
Jenny Hill says
The judge was given so much evidence. photos, video, he even acknowledged that the plaintiff lied, yet he awarded him money.
Renate says
The judge must be ignorant. He didn’t want to bring politics into it? Doesn’t he know that wherever Islam is involved, there are always politics.
Dj says
+1
Westman says
This reminds me of an instance many years ago, in the 60’s, when a man in our town harrassed a local businessman and was escorted out. The belligerent man sued in court and was awarded the minimum, $50. However, while passing judgement, the judge said he had no choice in the matter and advised the business owner, “If it happens again, get your money’s worth!”
mortimer says
WELCOME TO THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE!
THIS JUDGE HAS IMPOSED SHARIA LAW … where a dhimmi may not criticize a Muslim, no matter how badly the Muslim behaves.
The Lib-Jihad Party of Canada is so concerned about protecting Islam from criticism, that their APPOINTED, HAND-PICKED JUDGES (secretly working for the Lib-Jihad) will fine the victims of assault for any pretext.
Protesting ISLAM WILL BE PUNISHED IN CANADA, by LIB-JIHAD JUDGES … so the message is ‘SUBMIT TO ISLAM’.
To say a man made an obscene gesture is WRONG now? Only in Jihadi Justin’s Canada. The original Canadians have been told they are DHIMMIS.
underbed cat says
Don’t forget the U.K. …Germany …..the world is in trouble.
Dj says
+1
underbed cat says
The mb in Canada has infiltrated human rights and government with their version of correct speech, which covers over the truth, and now calls the repeating suras that tie to violence, when done in public Islamophobic, slander, racist, hate speech, but if quoted in the mosque (with the exception of days of outreach omitted while trying to build a bridge or path for non believers to convert) obligation. They have attached laws that makes it a crime otherwise. No criticism or information allowed. So tolerant ? Truth is stranger than fiction as they say how did they get there? Canada used to be very good at the border protection, now the welcome sign is out and the potential will move in unseen, some may change some will not.
Tommy says
Anyone know the judge’s name?
rubiconcrest says
I hope this unfair ruling can be appealed.
Guy Forester says
I suspect that the reason this type of suppression of truth prevails has to do with deep pockets. The government has unlimited access to our bank accounts, paychecks, and property. The jihadis have the backing of OPEC money via front organizations and paid for politicians (including, no doubt, elected judges). You and I do not have deep pockets or the backing of big bucks to pay for the costs of endless rounds of appeals up to Supreme Court level (various names in various countries). This $11K fine would cost over 10 times (possibly up to $1 million or more) to appeal through the various levels of courts.
gravenimage says
This is part of it, certainly–but notice that the Anti-Jihadists are not receiving this sort of largess from the government.
eduardo odraude says
People need to be filming everything. When police engage in misconduct or people assault you, having video can be very helpful later in court. Here in the US, when a leftist recently repeatedly assaulted a peaceful conservative, it was caught on video. Because of the video, the leftist has been charged with three felony counts and a misdemeanor, and his face has been plastered, to his shame, all over the internet. Millions have seen what a thug he is.
Leslie says
I hope these folks can appeal. This seems like a great case to ask for help with legal fees on GoFundMe. I would certainly donate! Also, I’d sit in the dankest, darkest prison in Siberia before I’d give that entitled, evil, lazy, perverted loser one thin, red cent, just on principle! I’d die in prison before I allowed that injustice to stand and more of us are going to have to band together and refuse to compromise our principles or we’ll all end up submitting, paying jizya, converting, being tortured and/or murdered. Not necessarily in that order either! This is happening everywhere and I fear Earth is barreling toward WWIII. The worst part? Not only will we be fighting the Muslims, we’ll be fighting civil wars simultaneously against the gov’t elites battling on behalf of their built in voters! Why do the elites think that the Islamists will spare them once the Muslims are in power? Check how well that worked out for the Communist Russians that helped Khomeini overthrow the Iranian government. Oh, wait! You can’t! The Muslims murdered them and threw them in a mass grave!
Jenny Hill says
https://www.gofundme.com/ys54q-overcoming-injustice
gravenimage says
Thanks.
eduardo odraude says
$11K for saying someone spit? I’d say that’s an evil or criminal judge. But then, the Canadian government is a bit backward, like Europe, since their law does not include a First Amendment equivalent. The founders of the US (unlike many people in the US today) were in this respect more sophisticated than many of today’s supposedly sophisticated people. The only thing that saves the US today is that our founders, when it comes to free speech, were more civilized and educated than the leaders who followed them. Without the First Amendment, we’d probably be as barbarian, ignorant, and stupid on this issue as Europe’s and Canada’s elites often are. How ironic that European elites often think themselves the height of sophistication! Yet they show the shoddiness and crudeness of their education when they don’t even understand the need of free speech, the bad things that happen when you curtail speech, and they come up with all kinds of idiotic reasons to curtail it. Well, European civilization may be drawing to its close (in the next generation) precisely because of that failure.
Paul J says
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, will make violent revolution inevitable.
JFK
No Fear says
Be very very careful about posting online anything about a living person. They can sue. If someone does something to you go to the police with your evidence.
Tom says
Vote, Vote, Vote in October to put an end to M-103 and all of the anti Canadian legislation and policies of this corrupt Trudeau regime.
Vote, Vote, Vote in October to return Canada to Canadians and to make our rights to free speech and assembly number one priority.
Vote, Vote, Vote in October to rid our country of the politics of division and selective justice.
Vote NO to Trudeau and his Islam loving, anti semitic, anti Canadian government.
gravenimage says
+1
Dusty says
+2
Tom says
Most people have smart phones. Use them in public places if you are confronted by anyone who is showing any form of aggression to you or someone else.
In Canada we have a legal system NOT a justice system, so direct evidence that proves your case MUST be presented to avoid any issue of a judge or adjudicator showing bias to the aggressor.
You are allowed to video in a public place, so use that very powerful tool to your advantage and don’t allow the system to win.
gravenimage says
Canada: Muslim harasses anti-jihad protesters, is awarded $11,000
…………………
This is *just sickening*. Where is justice in Canada now?
gravenimage says
Meanwhile, this is what is actually going on with Muslims in Canada:
“Canada: Muslim student detonates incendiary devices in college building, college evacuated and closed”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/canada-muslim-student-detonates-incendiary-devices-in-college-building-college-evacuated-and-closed
sidney penny says
There is no law or justice is Small Claims Court.
gravenimage says
Sometimes there is–I have a friend and colleague who had a client who simply refused to pay him for the artwork he did–they had no problem with the work, and were using it in company materials, nor did they have sudden financial difficulties; they just refused to pay–and he took them to small claims court and was paid.
But certainly there is no justice in this case.
Yohanan says
Perhaps someone can find mention of the above specific event/case? Who is the anonymous judge who hit on Pegida Canada?
The current wiki edit says SLAPP is “unusual” in Canada. (?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation#Canada
UNCLE VLADDI says
SJWs like AntiFa are hypocrites, and all hypocrites are criminals – they “project” their own criminal motivations, desires and actions onto their intended victims. They want to enslave everyone else, demanding that only they should have rights and no responsibilities, while everyone else should have no right to defend themselves against them, but only the responsibility to become and remain their slaves. They want the “right to your stuff for free, without any responsibility to have to earn or otherwise pay for it. They want an equality of outcome – to have the same stuff you bothered to earn – not an equality of opportunity, where they would have to earn it, too. Since this perpetually extortive SLAVERY attempt is irrational, they have no valid logical arguments they can use to achieve it peacefully, and as such they have to rely on emotions and outright lies.
“Social” justice – as the name implies – is all about group and gang rights, which is why it’s strongest proponents these days, “AntiFa,” are a rabid mob of extortive gangsters, seeking to oppress and enslave innocent individuals under the pretext of gaming them for “reparations” for past crimes in which they didn’t personally participate: crimes committed somewhere else by groups of other individuals who may have resembled the individuals they now seek to extort, against other individuals or groups of same who may resemble those whom they currently pretend to support.
And naturally, this is also hypocrisy, where those same racist rules by which they excuse their fellow “People Of Color” criminals – “Not All Muslims (did or do it)!” and “Lone wolves, mental illness!” are never equitably applied to their intended White victims.
It’s also the usual self-defeating paranoid masochism, where they try to “control” their own fears of “other” gangs, BY inducing and causing others to induce those very same worst-case scenario mistakes and problems which cause the pain-causing damages they fear the most. Like islam and all other gang-rights-make-right criminal extortion attempts, it is really only ever based on a focus on their own petty emotional fears, the resulting despair, and angry, hopeless, jealous greed. In other words, their individual criminal choices to embrace gangsterism is excused by the cause-and-effect reversing pre-posterous “inevitable force” alibi of “hurt feelings.” As such, the only way to stop it is to educate people as to what their emotions really are.
Factor in their mutually hypocritical, literally thought-killing psychopathy into it: they – the globalist banksters, all the corporations they own, the governments they control, their media propagandists who only exist to ask all the wrong questions all the time so their master won’t have to answer the right ones – are all gangsters, out to destroy and enslave all others’ individuality because, since they can’t trust their own minds and emotions, there’s no way they’ll risk trusting anyone else’s.
Identity politics is based on gang rights and group victimology. Those who embrace it are hypocrites who discriminate against every one and every thing based on voluntary and involuntary group memberships, not ever on any individual merits. SJWs embrace group rights to take away the rights of all individual human citizens in one group (based on some involuntary group membership symptoms or characteristics, like skin color or sex or gender) to give them to the individuals in another group. And this “reverse-discrimination” transfer of wealth, rights and power they falsely pretend to validate based on the allegedly chosen criminal actions of some other individual people who may have resembled one, at some other times, and in some other places, against some unrelated people who may have resembled some other group of individuals. In other words, whenever anyone embraces group rights, ALL individual spay the price for crimes they themselves personally never committed.
Add to this the fact that ALL cops, lawyers and judges are PROFESSIONAL HYPOCRITES (and don’t forget: all hypocrites are criminals, and all criminals are hypocrites) scared of losing their paychecks, perks, pensions, and powers, and you can see what we Canadians are up against. Remember, Canada has been a “socialist” country, all about group rights and hurt feelings, since at least the early 1960s, when Turdeau senior first came into his full power over us, transforming Canada into the Great White Shithole is remains today. Canada is one of THE MOST INDEBTED countries on Earth, yet – being ruled by “socialists” – can’t seem to help continuing to borrow our way into enslaving our children forever, just to keep kicking the can down the road to keep the libertine “liberal” criminals in power.
Gamaliel Isaac says
In Canada, section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states: “Any person charged with an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal”. If the judge had followed the law he would have required that the plaintiff prove that the defendant ied about being spat at. The plaintiff would have to be proof that he lost his job because of the tweet. The Canadian judge presumed guilt of the defendant.
Dean says
I can’t wait until antifa and the MB come to disagreement and to open antagonism. Eventually these two groups who now use each other to achieve very different goals, will find themselves on opposite sides.
That will happen as soon as the Muslim population rises a bit more, secures its power and political base in America and finds that the white antifa are actually not willing to be placed under the thumb of the jihadists. I don’t think that BLF will submit to jihad but that remains to be seen.
gravenimage says
This will probably not happen until they have been able to destroy civilized society–I don’t want to wait that long.
Dean says
I meant BLM.
Guy Forester says
Actually, I think you have the correct acronym.
🙂
J D.S says
Same old muslim tactic that has held Islam together these many centuries…FORCE and FEAR….
FORCE and FEAR along with the Apostate Law are the three things that have kept Islam alive.
When muhammad found that people did not flock to his new man made religion, he then turned to FORCE. Forcing people to join then using FEAR and the Apostate Law to keep them there and it is still working. Especially in Muslim countries….Well today FEAR, outside the Muslim world is working as seen by this case where it was plain to see that this Muslim man was in the wrong but the judge, because if FEAR, ruled for him.
So Sad that a wonderful country like Canada is going down the wrong road…..the road to ruin…Now where does the fault lie?…..with elected / appointed Persons or could it be the fault of its citizenry for electing and re-electing…..Hmmmmm something to think about. …Is Canada alone in this fiasco???? I don’t think so.
gategustafson says
That the defendant wishes to remain anonymous, I understand. That she doesn’t mention that judge’s name, I do not.
GS Ruddin says
You condemn Jihad on this sit but not right wing Christian fascists pushing crusades, invasion and conversions of Muslims, racism and hatred?
This site will have no credibility as long as you show such hypocritical nonsense. What a joke!
gravenimage says
GS Ruddin wrote:
You condemn Jihad on this sit but not right wing Christian fascists pushing crusades, invasion and conversions of Muslims, racism and hatred?
…………………………….
Where are right wing Christians waging crusades, invading, or forcibly converting Muslims?
The idea that Jihad Watch has no credibility as long as it does not address something that is not happening is simply grotesque.
Meanwhile, there have been over 34,000 Jihad terror attacks just since 9/11.
IanB says
Canada’s National Anthem
O Canada! Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all thy sons command.
With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
The True North strong and free!
From far and wide, O Canada,
We stand on guard for thee.
God keep our land, glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee;
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
It now has a somewhat ironic ring to it does it not?
gravenimage says
I’m an American, but I have always loved Canada’s national anthem. But you are right about the irony at this point, sadly.