“At least 23 people were arrested in connection with violent riots that broke out when a far-right anti-Islam activist threw a copy of the Koran in the air.”
Note the branding of the man as “far right,” but no mention of the identity of those who were rioting. The title should have been: “Muslims erupt in violent riots because anti-Sharia activist threw copy of Koran in the air.”
This is why people in the West are scared of Islam, and for this reason, Islamic supremacists call Westerners “Islamophobic.” It’s a win-win for them. Through jihad violence, assaults, Sharia no-go zones, aggressively pushes for punishment of those who offend Islam, etc., they are succeeding in casting terror into the hearts of disbelievers, as they are commanded to do in the Qur’an (8:60).
“Police threw teargas after missiles were thrown at them when the unrest spread on Sunday to several parts of Copenhagen, Denmark.” Police also “warned people to stay away from the affected areas or indoors for their own safety.”
Meanwhile:
“Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen he condemned Mr Paludan’s “meaningless” actions. He said on Twitter: “I strongly disagree with Paludan’s meaningless provocations that have no other purpose than sow disunity…Meet him with arguments – not with violence…..Protect democracy and freedom of expression.”
Rasmussen is playing politics. He must know that the freedom of speech is all but lost precisely because of what he is doing. He is exonerating violent Muslims and condemning the act of insulting Islam. Christianity and other religions have all suffered insults without their adherents rioting. Rassmussen is misguided and fearful himself, and has thus, like others, bows to Islamic blasphemy laws and encourages jihadist intimidation and thuggery.
“Copenhagen riots: Violent protests after anti-Islam campaigner THROWS Koran in air,” by Rachel Russell, Express, April 15, 2019:
AT least 23 people were arrested in connection with violent riots that broke out when a far-right anti-Islam activist threw a copy of the Koran in the air.
Police threw teargas after missiles were thrown at them when the unrest spread on Sunday to several parts of Copenhagen, Denmark. Rasmus Paludan, the founder of the anti-immigrant party Hard Line, held a demonstration calling for Islam to be banned from Denmark. He had thrown the holy book more than once in Noerrobro, which is an anti-immigrant area in the capital.
Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen he condemned Mr Paludan’s “meaningless” actions.
He said on Twitter: “I strongly disagree with Paludan’s meaningless provocations that have no other purpose than sow disunity.
“Meet him with arguments – not with violence.
“Protect democracy and freedom of expression.
“Do not let derogatory actions directed at specific groups in Denmark destroy our unity.”
Mr Paludan had cobblestones thrown back at him by counter-protestors, before police then took him away.
He was not injured in the violence, according to Danish broadcaster TV2.
Dustbins and bicycles were also set on fire as the riots spread to other areas in Copenhagen…..
Heather says
It’s not islame anything really, it’s just that violent morons are scary.
Malcolm (South Afric) says
The the intrinsic nature of Islam, it must be remembered is based on Mohammed moral failures. It would be surprising that anyone who has a sense of truth and logic could conclude that Islam is a religion revealed by God to Mohammed.
Firstly, are there any recorded witnesses to any any revelation by God to Mohammed? Is there any recorded miracle that were witnesses by those of his followers?
The only proof or evidence, is Mohammed word, which does not stand up to critical analysis.
Mohammed a pagan, employed as a trader travelled by camel in doing business for Khadiga, his employer whom he latter married.
What does stand up to critical analysis is that Mohammed did and was in contact with Jewish and Christian people in his area of trade and was influenced by them in understanding of the the one and true God. It is discernible by a reading the Koran, exist corrupted events taken from Jewish and Christian teaching put in verse in the Koran.
What also stands out to historical critical analysis is that Mohammed broke every commandment that was revealed by God through the two great religions that are bound together through history (Jewish, Christian religion).
Mohammed personal morality falls below the pathological. This is evident from the evil deeds of those who emulate him in riotous behaviour such as the above events and those we all have witnessed over the years.
Deborah Lindley Dennis says
Interesting information.
Thanks!
CRUSADER says
M
Have you read Robert Spencer’s book about Mohamhead?
Malcolm (South Afric) says
CRUSADER
No, not yet.
My sources have been saints of the early Church who vigorously challenge the adherents of Mohammed, the Fathers of the Church, which are assembled writings from the beginnings of the early Christians, other source is from Fathers Rumble and Carty. There have been many others.
Robert Spencer’s work is is held in high regard within many Catholic communities. Unfortunately Mr Spencer has not always been treated well by the hierarchy. Many saints have been treated in the same manner.
Jill says
Most concise explanation of Islam’s man-made directives.
gravenimage says
Heather, Islam teaches this kind of violence.
mortimer says
Sharia permits the MURDER of anyone who insults or demeans anything in Islam ‘IN ANY WAY’, since such a person is deemed to be at war with Islam and insults cannot be forgiven because Mohammed is the only one who may make that decision and Mohammed is dead (Islamic logic).
The execution of blasphemers is obligatory:
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim at war (‘kafir harbi’) with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
Sharia law forbids the ‘mention’ of any Islamic topic by a dirty kafir.
The Sharia manual of the Shafi school states:
“We have already discussed killing the person who, with intent, curses the Prophet, belittles him or slights him in any way. The judgement in this case is clear.” (i.e. the sentence is execution)- from Sharia law manual, “Qadhi Iyaadh in ash-Shifa”, Volume No.2, Page No. 27
-as-Suyuti writes: “(If they break their oaths…) This ayah (K. 9:11-12) is used as a proof by those who say that if a dhimmi attacks Islam (VERBALLY) or the Qur’an or MENTIONS the Prophet in a bad manner, HE IS KILLED, whether he has broken a treaty or not. Those who say that his repentance is accepted use as a proof, ‘hopefully they will stop.’”
CRUSADER says
Yet, we Westerners do not have to permit or allow Muzzies to misbehave in any way.
Rufolino says
No wonder people are terrified of offending Moslems. They’ve got the West by the balls.
John Allan says
‘No wonder people are terrified of offending Moslems. They’ve got the West by the balls.’
What balls?
lilyredrose says
Stupid coward won’t condemn rioters. Just like in US when morons riot. Pathetic.
Kesselman says
The Danish PM is a mediocre politician like the majority in the parliament. They bow to the aggressive Islamofascists. Now and again Larry Loop Rasmussen accuses the voices speaking up against the violent mozzies.—Unfortunately, it’s the same depressing picture throughout western Europe. Only the Visegrad-countries show some spine.
CRUSADER says
Geert Wilders in Denmark: Deporting millions of Muslims may be necessary – Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMk6F_oHiCM
gravenimage says
Hear, hear, Geert Wilders!
Leon Degney says
Why are people so slow to wake up if they wake up at all that is? Can’t they see the problems caused by Muslims EVERYWHERE they go? Why is it that these people think appeasing and forgiving their atrocities will eventually convince Muslims to assimilate and integrate, when in actual fact the opposite is the case. The host culture eventually capitulates and submission to Islam is complete, although in some cases there are a few percent remaining who have differing views but they cannot expect a safe and peaceful co-existence in a predominantly Islamic area.
gravenimage says
Many people are still in denial over the threat of Islam.
Ragdoll says
Sounds more like a typical day in downtown Karachi than civilised Europe 🙁
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
Niels Hede Pedersen says
The point to note here is that Mr Paludan was removed from the action by the police a couple of minutes after the rioting started – for his own protection. But that was when it escalated, with cars and containers being set on fire, and cobblestones, and anything at hand, was being thrown at the police. The perpetrators were obviously immigrants, most of them young men, but also some middle-aged men. Some of those arrested turned out to be on the police’s wanted list or are known gang members. One of the rioters was wearing a t-shirt with the ISIS symbol. Mr Paludan had announced a separate demonstration in a Copenhagen suburb later on the same day. Although he never made it there, similar riots broke out in that place. Today, an unsecured hand grenade was found in the street in the Nørrebro area. In other words, the demonstration was only the spark that lighted the fire, with the police being seen as representatives of the enemy – the majority society. When the Danish pm is so cautious, it has to do with the collective memory of the Muhammad cartoon crisis of 2005, which developed into the greatest foreign policy crisis for Denmark since WW2.
Lisalles says
hERE IS THE PRIME MINISTERS TWITTER ACCOUNT: https://twitter.com/larsloekke?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
AND HERE IS GOOGLES TRANSLATOR: https://translate.google.com/
TWEET THE COWARD.
Renate says
This is why Islamic ideology should not be allowed in the West.
CRUSADER says
So, would Islam be disallowed as a political ideology but allowed as a religious faith?
crawford421 says
There is no “religious faith” to Islam, it is all political.
CRUSADER says
If only it could be codified that way, then the legal and political systems in the West could address Islam more strongly.
gravenimage says
Islam is both.
CRUSADER says
Some people thought this would all stop once Denmark wised up and sealed its borders from migrant incursion via Germany….
abad says
Uh, Denmark is NOT the best country for Moslems to be.
They should all be rounded up and deported to a Moslem-majority nation.
PRCS says
Rational people are NOT ‘scared’ of Islam, as Islam is just an ideology.
Many are–rightfully–fearful of the MUSLIMS who act it out.
Do the Yezedis know what Qur’an and sunna actually say? Did they fear Islam as IS ‘fighters’ were raping and murdering them or did they fear the MUSLIMS committing those crimes?
Do the majority of Filipino Christians fear texts they’ve likely never read–or the Muslims who scream Allahu Akbar as they enslave, rape, and behead them and tourists there?
Islam? Pffft!
Muslims? They’re the physical problem.
mardabo says
Obviously, everyone knows that already.
The term Islam is a euphemism for jihadi’s.
PRCS says
I wish everyone did know that.
But, they don’t.
And I do like your definition of Islam.
crawford421 says
No Islam, no Muslims.
Arnold Jackson says
If they don’t like the Qur’an thrown into the air they’d hate what I do with my copy.
kevsh says
What ? Defecate on it and post it on facebook. I’m positive Muslims have done far worse to the holy bible.
peter says
Put it to good use my dear . Keep one copy in all the bath rooms . You will save a lot on toilet paper and will save a lot of trees even those hiding the Jew behind them .
gravenimage says
Denmark: Muslims riot, attack police with missiles, burn garbage cans and bikes because man throws Qur’an in the air
…………..
And some morons are siding with the rioting Muslim thugs.
Ewanda says
The only thing Denmark and all Western countries who want to protect their civilized societies need to do is deport all the Imams, Sheiks, and any others that are considered Islamic clergy. it is the clerics as in ancient Egypt, Aztecs, Mayans, Incas, etc. that drive the agenda for power. Without their direction and enforcing penalties, soon the ummah would fall apart. Unfortunately sympathetic Islamofiles will scuttle the strategy.
CRUSADER says
Islamofiles…
Islamophiles
Islamoflies
Islamofilth….
gravenimage says
Many ordinary Muslims are murderously devout as well, though. It is not just the clerics.
CRUSADER says
GravenImage ~
What is the solution to all of this?
gravenimage says
As I have noted before, CRUSADER, we were largely safe from Jihad when Islam was isolated.
First we have to stop the continued invasion of Muslims into the West–stopping returning ISIS Jihadists and the US “Muslim ban” are a good first step. Australia and Italy are also starting to turn Muslim invaders away.
Then we have to vigorously oppose Jihad–no more allowing Muslims to riot in the streets, as here. Let Muslims know they cannot get away with violence, “No Go Zones”, Shari’ah patrols, and rape.
Finally, we need to start deportations after prison time served, starting with the worst Jihadists.
CRUSADER says
“…people in the West are scared of Islam, and for this reason, Islamic supremacists call Westerners “Islamophobic.” It’s a win-win for (Muslims)….”
==============================================================
Yep! That’s why we need a different paradigm which will combat this phenomenon.
owensgate says
What can we expect, in reality, when we make some obscure reference to a “Terrorist” attack, after some particularly heinous Islamic jihad attack? What is a “terrorist”, exactly? We lose all advantage by not calling them out for being ISLAMIC JIHAD ATTACKS. That’s what they ARE.
Michael says
Terrorism as described in the Oxford dictionary, which I would consider a good source of english meanings is “The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” Nothing to do with the way it has been thrown around since Bush introduced it into all our vocabularies on 9-11. Now they talk about changing the definition to suit Bush’s usage which has become the new norm. Call a spade a spade. These attacks are Islamist Jihadist Muslim criminal acts of violence intimidation and cowardice and should be dealt with as such. Jail and/or deportation. The real reason political leaders succumb is because they see and fear the Islamic majority rule becoming a reality and know that in that situation anyone who speaks against Islam will be beheaded. Even the “dirty fakirs who speak of Islam”. Prevention is better than cure.
Guy Forester says
Amazing. The Norsemen (and probably some Norsewomen as well) terrified western and eastern Europe, from what is now Russia all the way down to the Mediterranean Sea. Now, they seem so terrified of a few migrants that they cannot seem to act logically and forcefully to protect their own homelands.
Leon Degney says
Yes, what an amazing turnaround, the terrorizers are now being terrorized.
gravenimage says
So you want to see Europeans suffer for what the Vikings did a thousand years ago?
jayell says
OK, they acquired a reputation for a bit of rape and pillage here and there, but they weren’t the only ones playing that game at the time. They also had quite a few constructive things to offer to the societies with which they became involved, as people in the north-east of England discovered, but muslims offer absolutely nothing.
ibgreenie3 says
Denmark, wake up! This is your land, the land of your ancestors. Violent people have come into your country & wish to remake it their own. Let those who are ungrateful & commit violence go home where they are free to do so.
jayell says
The Danish Prime Minister:-
“I strongly disagree with Paludan’s meaningless provocations that have no other purpose than sow disunity….”
1. Mr. Paludan’s action in throwing the Qu’ran into the air was NOT meaningless.
2. It was no doubt intended as a personal comment on the Qu’ran, and not as ‘provocation’ to anyone.
3. There is clearly already terminal disunity in Denmark caused by the muslims, and it’s now too late in the
day to even think about accusing anyone else of sowing it.
4. In this ridiculously inappropriate statement, the Prime Minister demonstrates (a) that he is either hopelessly
out of touch with the social realities in Denmark today or he’s deliberately misleading the public when he
actually knows otherwise, or/and (b) he has an agenda that entails positively promoting muslim and islam
in the face of well-documented negative evidence already in the public domain, and thus renders himself a
menace to the well-being of Denmark and the Danish people.
Joe says
And, throwing a Koran in the air is not violent. The Muslim response was violent.
gravenimage says
Very true.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Meet them with arguments, not violence.”
Is tossing a book an act of violence? And isn’t arguing with Moslems a form of attempted suicide? If it isn’t a form of direct attempted suicide, it’s a form of civilizational suicide. What does Rasmussen think will happen through accommodation, that Moslems will suddenly temporize after fourteen centuries of violence?
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
We see this all the time with muslims who respond to free expression like little children throwing a tantrum, except people get hurt or killed and property gets destroyed. Ya get the impression we’re dealing with people who have very low intellects, too closed minded and immature to grant others the same rights they’ve come to expect for themselves. I just wish instead of them acting violent for frivolous reasons they’d take a moment to consider the violence in their own religion and the effect it’s having on the world’s peace; or perhaps they could try a little harder to prevent their brethren from mass raping our kids and women, that would sure be nice. You never see them rioting over those injustices, but a koran tossed in the air ( which hurts no one) is their excuse to destroy property and threaten our peace and security. So it seems they have the right to freely express their views violently and illegally, but we can’t toss a koran harmlessly in the air. Hmmm…. I get the feeling these muslims haven’t figured out what free speech and equality means yet. I think we could get more sense from a bull in a china shop than we do from these silly muslims. I think the problem is that these muslims have been conditioned by their “religion” and culture to think of themselves as superior to you and me, so that gives them the right to play the bully and step on the rights of every one else. In their minds we’re supposed to “submit” to their god, but really, they want us to submit to them and their self-serving bigoted ways. Such thinking should not be coddled with conciliatory talk, islam is an aggressive ideological mindset just as dangerous as Nazism or Communism. There’s a reason the allies of WWII shut down all forms of Nazi expression in Germany, because they knew the power of that ideology to stir trouble and fanaticism against them. The ideology of islam is no different, the murder and terror it causes is an epidemic now and is 1400 years old. Islam is an ancient cultural paradigm, not a fad. I believe our politicians and leaders have a moral and legal obligation to be honest about the threat and do what ever we can to preserve our freedoms and safety from islam’s jihad intentions. To me their demon god and the murderous idiot that invented him are worth about as much as an African fetish covered in blood and spit whiskey. I’ll lick a monkey’s butt before I let trash like that rob me and my neighbors of our freedoms and security. And I think every freedom-loving, peace-aspiring person should feel the same d*mn way.
KWJ says
Right, it’s more about submitting to them than their Allah. Aside from extorting the dhimmi Jews, Christians and Hindus, they had all these discriminatory rules to humiliate them and they were randomly treated badly and by mobs like these guys in Denmark who are just one snapshot of the past.
I think there is some inferiority complex and shame that festers in their collective subconscious which manifests in a collective narcissism as with Muhammad. Since they can’t stop the madness, they just keep doing it or else their religion falls apart. There is so much in the Hadiths that show Muhammad to be a flawed, immoral, hypocritical, odd and temperamental man in the way a narcissist is. While all Muslims don’t tacitly agree with Muhammad by note of their actions, they have a hard time criticizing those who do. In this case most will justify their violence.
Rasmussen said to meet them with arguments not violence. There are plenty of Muslims who do argue. He says to protect free speech. The guy’s throwing the Qur’an was a stupid act, in my opinion-not my style-but too many politicians have said speech and arguments alone sow disunity or incite violence or is Islamophobic. He should have strongly condemned the rioters who appear to have used the moment to act out their tantrum by destroying property. Very weak, Rasmussen. Free speech isn’t always intellectually pretty. throwing a Qur’an didn’t hurt anyone, and hurting feelings is part of argument. Hypocritically, when Ilhan Omar challenged the Jewish Congresswoman who said words matter and they hurt, Nancy Pelosi said she is for free speech. This picking and choosing has to stop. Short of telling people to do something illegal or violent, you either believe in free speech or not-you can’t cherrypick or that unfair, unbalanced application of free speech will lead to more violence…special treatment towards Muslims which should anger people because it’s discrimination. There has always been people who flip their switch like these Muslim hoodlums. But time and again, these politicians and leftists have created the conditions for DISUNITY and they have themselves to blame. These issues existed before Trump.
It’s nuts.
hannahlu52 says
This is never going to stop as long as people EVERYWHERE continue to tolerate the moslem insanity.
RISE-UP — GET ANGRY — FIGHT THE BARBARIANS! GET RID OF THEM — ALL!
IF NOT, BE PREPARED TO BE RULED BY THE SAVAGES — PERIOD.
hannahlu52 says
BY THE WAY, THE TERM/WORD ”ISLAMOPHOBIA/ISLAMOPHOBE/ISLAMOPHOBIC” IS A CONTRIVED ”LIE” THAT WAS INVENTED IN THE EARLY 1990S.
TECHNICALLY, THERE IS NO SUCH WORD – OR ACTION – OR PERSON!
RESEARCH IT — DO NOT ACCEPT ‘LABELS’ – DO NOT ACCEPT ”LIES!”
gravenimage says
“Did the Muslim Brotherhood invent the term ‘Islamophobia”’?
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/08/did-the-muslim-brotherhood-invent-the-term-islamophobia
John Allan says
Only threw it in the air? Should have burned it.