• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Netherlands: Muslim councilor wants halal beach: “Muslims feel uncomfortable with scantily clad, ugly people”

Apr 19, 2019 12:30 pm By Robert Spencer

After the halal beach is opened, how long will it be before the non-halal beaches are closed down?

“Muslim councilor wants halal beach in The Hague: ‘Muslims feel uncomfortable with scantily clad, ugly people,'” translated from “Islamitisch raadslid wil halalstrand in Den Haag: ‘Moslims voelen zich onprettig bij schaars geklede, lelijke mensen,’” by Graziella Gioia, HLN, April 19, 2019:

A nudist beach? Then also a “halal beach” in The Hague. At least, if it is up to Party of the Unity Councilor Arnoud van Doorn. According to the controversial Dutch politician, Muslims feel “unpleasant with scantily clad, ugly people.”

According to Van Doorn, there is a need for a so-called “halal beach”. Muslims don’t feel at home on most beaches, he says. “Not only Muslims, but also many other residents feel uncomfortable with the appearance of very scantily dressed and often unesthetically designed beachgoers,” he writes to the city council of The Hague. “In addition, women in particular indicate that they are increasingly confronted with unwanted allusions and advances by people of the opposite sex during beach visits.”

He believes that The Hague should therefore consider whether it is possible to designate part of the beach for Muslims. After all, there is also a nudist beach for a small group of enthusiasts, so why not design a part of the beach for the Muslim community, Van Doorn argues. Halal beach resorts already exist in seaside resorts in Turkey and Indonesia, among others. On halal beaches, Muslims could enjoy the sun according to their religious regulations. For example, men and women sunbathe separately on Lombok.

Van Doorn came to the PVV (Geert Wilders’ anti-Islam party) in 2010 in the city council of The Hague and in 2013 – after his conversion – switched to the Islamic Party for Unity. In 2016 he received a work sentence for selling drugs to minors and the possession of a prohibited alarm gun….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Islamic supremacism, Netherlands Tagged With: Arnoud Van Doorn, The Hague


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. gert says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 12:35 pm

    give them an inch and they will cut off your arm….them your head.

    • windrush48 says

      Apr 20, 2019 at 7:26 am

      If they feel “uncomfortable” going to the beach …. they should not go to the beach …. besides, I am “uncomfortable” when there are “lumpy bags of smelly laundry” running around whining about everyone else.

      • SHANIA says

        Apr 20, 2019 at 8:56 pm

        Agree with you😁

      • Elmer says

        Apr 22, 2019 at 8:56 am

        I agree

  2. CogitoErgoSum says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 12:36 pm

    One thing stands out abut Muslims: it’s always about the way they feel and not about the way someone else feels.

    • revereridesagain says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 1:15 pm

      Exactly. There are nude beaches, and there are beaches where you can’t run around with no clothes on. There is no need for “halal” beaches anywhere but in Muslim countries where men don’t want “their” women to run around with no clothes on for other men to see.

      After all, Allahoochiekitchiekoo has deemed us the “most vile of all people”. Why would Muslims care about our feelings? Or rights?

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 1:53 pm

      From what I have been able to find on this subject Muslim women may swim among men and “infidel women” if they cover themselves as the Muslim woman above is covered. However, if the group of swimmers is of Muslim women ONLY they may follow the same requirements as for men when men go swimming. The Muslim women would need cover only the area between the naval and the knees when they swim among themselves. (Looks like Muslim women swimming topless among other Muslim women is not prohibited.)

      So, it’s those nasty “infidel” women who are the reason the Muslims need a separate beach.

      • CRUSADER says

        Apr 19, 2019 at 3:26 pm

        Shocking how these wet-soaked Muslimas show off their ankles in public!!

        ==============================

        Surf’s Up for Muslim American Females:

        • PRCS says

          Apr 19, 2019 at 8:21 pm

          Hijabi #1 states that there are two purposes for hijab (which, btw, is not just a headscarf):

          1. Modesty.
          As far as I know, any ‘modesty’ it represents is a cultural imperative forced upon Muslim women by Muslim men who don’t want other men to see ‘their women’.

          2. “..it represents Islam.”
          When out among unrelated men, that is its true meaning.

          *Qur’an 24:31 (https://quran.com/33/59)
          “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

          Primarily by Muslim men.

          *Qur’an 24:31 (https://quran.com/24/31)
          “And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment.”

          For those who don’t already know, slaves are what Muslims’ right hands possess.

          *And there’s this from a Muslim–I assume)–to a Muslim site):

          Is hijab wajib (obligatory) for a slave woman?
          https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/39109/is-hijab-wajib-obligatory-for-a-slave-woman

          *And, while this devout little Utah Muslima correctly stated the purpose of ‘covering up’, the filthy unbelievers at the table with her apparently didn’t catch what she said:

          “A woman that doesn’t wear the hijab is most likely to get sexual assault and abuse than a woman that does wear it, ’cause she covers up.”

          If she clicks her heels together–three times–she might get back in Iraq.

        • PRCS says

          Apr 19, 2019 at 8:57 pm

          **

        • PRCS says

          Apr 19, 2019 at 9:58 pm

          Hijabi #1 states that there are two purposes for hijab (which, btw, is not just a headscarf):

          1. Modesty.
          As far as I know, any ‘modesty’ it represents is a cultural imperative forced upon Muslim women by Muslim men who don’t want other men to see ‘their women’.

          2. “..it represents Islam.”
          When out among unrelated men, that is its true meaning.

          *Qur’an 24:31
          “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

          Primarily by Muslim men.

          *Qur’an 24:31
          “And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment.”

          For those who don’t already know, slaves are what Muslims’ right hands possess.

          *And there’s this from a Muslim–I assume)–to a Muslim site):

          Is hijab wajib (obligatory) for a slave woman?
          https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/39109/is-hijab-wajib-obligatory-for-a-slave-woman

          *And, while this devout little Utah Muslima correctly stated the purpose of ‘covering up’, the filthy unbelievers at the table with her apparently didn’t catch what she said:

          “A woman that doesn’t wear the hijab is most likely to get sexual assault and abuse than a woman that does wear it, ’cause she covers up.”

          If she clicked her heels together–three times–she might get back in Iraq.

        • PRCS says

          Apr 19, 2019 at 10:34 pm

          https://fox13now.com/2018/11/15/letter-encourages-schools-to-adopt-religious-clothing-guidelines-after-boy-rips-girls-hijab-off-during-recess/

  3. Wellington says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 12:39 pm

    I feel uncomfortable around heavily clad ugly Muslims. Hmmm, I wonder what can be done about this?

    • Michael Garant says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 1:01 pm

      Hum…..not much I’m afraid……..you’re stuck with the eye sore and the uncomfortableness….and it will get a lot worse before it has a chance of getting better.

    • CRUSADER says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 3:08 pm

      Don’t go in the waters of Hawaii….
      ….things are changing there too…
      (Ridiculous to allow covering of ears, since they are distinguishing identifiers!!!)

      ———————

      ACLU of Hawaii sent letters to all four counties after a Muslim woman in Hilo struggled to get her driver’s license, because she was wearing a hijab, or head scarf, to take her photo.

      Laycie Tobosa, who was born and raised in Hawaii and is a practicing Muslim, says she was told she would need to uncover her ears or her photo would not be approved.

      She first applied for a renewed license on Feb. 1.

      Workers cited the federal Real ID Act of 2005, though the U.S. Department of Homeland Security provides guidance stating otherwise:

      Q. Does the REAL ID Act require an applicant who wears a head covering for religious reasons to alter or remove the head covering so that the driver’s license or identification card photograph shows their hair or ears?

      A. No. The REAL ID regulatory standards for the digital photograph recognize that some individuals may wear head coverings for religious or other reasons. However, such coverings should not obscure an applicant’s facial features or generate a shadow. For purposes of the photograph, the face should be visible from the hairline to the chin and forward of the ears, and be free of shadows. The REAL ID regulation does not require the exposure of the hair line or the ears.

      Tobosa tried to explain that what she was doing was legal, but nothing changed. After waiting for hours, Tobosa was granted a provisional driver’s license, which allowed her to drive, but she could not use it as a form of identification.

      She says she was baffled at the lack of training for workers at the driver’s licensing center.

      “I’m a business owner and I was trying to cash checks but I couldn’t cash checks,” she told KHON2. “It was extremely stressful. I spent countless hours on the phone, emails, trying to figure out a way to resolve this issue, because I knew in my heart it wasn’t right.”

      Tobosa was granted a full driver’s license on April 18.

      In a statement, Hawaii County officials said:

      “Initially, the County followed the REAL ID requirements in place at the time regarding how an applicant’s photo should appear; the requirements at the time stated that ‘(t)he face from crown to the base of the chin, and from ear-to-ear, shall be clearly visible and free of shadows. Veils, scarves or headdresses must not obscure any facial features and not generate shadow.’

      The Federal Department of Homeland Security, which set forth the REAL ID laws, updated its own interpretation of the requirements regarding head coverings. The updated interpretation of the law was not immediately conveyed to the State or the County.

      ‘As soon as the State and County became aware of the new interpretation of the law, Ms. Tobosa was immediately issued a full REAL ID compliant driver’s license on April 18, 2018,’ said Naomi O’Dell, VRL Administrator. ‘Since that time, we have been consistently following that interpretation.’”

      The ACLU of Hawaii says Tobosa was discriminated against.

      “Other applicants who are non-religious, they are allowed to have their ears obscured by their hair, yet just because Ms. Tobosa was religious and decided that she could not expose her ears, she has to jump through all these hoops and that’s wrong,” said ACLU staff attorney Wookie Kim.

      The ACLU states that “it is only thanks to Ms. Tobosa’s diligence and persistence that the County’s longstanding misinterpretation and unconstitutional application of what the REAL ID Act requires were brought to light.”

      The ACLU sent the county a letter, demanding that workers be trained in the equal and constitutional application of rules to everyone, regardless of religious belief.

      It also sent cautionary letters to Honolulu, Maui, and Kauai counties, urging them to review their administrative rules and make sure nothing can be interpreted as unconstitutional.

      “I just want the next Muslim woman, or any other person of any religion, going into that office to be treated with more respect than I was and to not be discriminated against for exercising their right as an American to freedom of religion,” Tobosa said.

      • elee says

        Apr 19, 2019 at 8:03 pm

        Doesn’t giving Muslim women driver’s licenses support their apostasy? Permit that, and are you not encouraging them to take off their veils and look at the road?

    • Jean (old) says

      Apr 20, 2019 at 10:06 am

      Burkas are scary because you never know what’s in there.

  4. Chrissie says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 12:42 pm

    You gotto love them, don’t you? Wanting to be made feel at home anywhere, including free accommodation, health care and schooling, (plus welfare when in dire straits), claiming uninhibited practice of the very cultural malpractice for which their country is in shambles, while making feel noone at home among themselves, while never stretching out the hand to anyone in a pluralistic attituted …!

  5. FYI says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 1:05 pm

    Is there something in the water in the NL?

    Is there inbreeding?Is that it?

    Van Doorn and Van Klaverern are converts to the murder cult of islam,the religion of antiChrist.

    There MUST be inbreeding going on,some epic failure in their primitive minds..

    Given ALL the information today about islam with its false god,false prophet and false scripture,it takes a particular type of idiot{..the silly white woman excited by all those colorful hijabs,the black guy who just doesn’t get the Irony,the thick Dutchmen..} to convert to the murderous,immoral cult of the pagan Arab god allah “The BEST of deceivers”k3:54 and lack the intelligence to see the problem with following a linguistically,theologically,morally and scientifically challenged god who ADMITS to being.. a champion deceiver.

    Can the Dutch converts to islam even figure it out?Nope.

    Being an atheist would be more logical than converting to a misogynistic,racist,murderous cult like islam.

    Would Jews,Christians be welcome on the muslim beach?I can’t see them being welcomed on an islamic beach…

    Of course not…

    islam:the religion for stupid people.

    {Meanwhile Non muslims feel increasingly uncomfortable with fraudulently pious, hijabbed,lipsticked,pug faced muslimas..can they not afford burqas?It’s what allah would want…}

    • revereridesagain says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 1:16 pm

      Yeah, there’s something in the water in the NL. Muslim females in soggy baggy clothes!

      • FYI says

        Apr 19, 2019 at 1:49 pm

        “She was afraid to come out of the water.
        She was as nervous as she could have been.

        She was afraid to come out of the water
        For the muslims had stolen the beach..

        She..wore..an..itsy witsy teeny weeny yellow polka dot Burquini..

        And so the muslims they cut off her head..”

        One-two-three-four tell us what the imam swore..

        • jayell says

          Apr 19, 2019 at 2:06 pm

          Nice one!

        • Marc says

          Apr 20, 2019 at 11:09 am

          Ha ha, nice one.

      • JMB says

        Apr 19, 2019 at 5:39 pm

        They certainly are in the water with heavy soggy clothes and in an Australian surf beach this is suicidal and puts the rescue teams at risk also when these inappropriately clad women get into difficulties.

    • Kim says

      Apr 21, 2019 at 12:56 pm

      FYI,

      van Klaveren was born in Amsterdam and studied in Amsterdam (even though the Free University of Amsterdam where he studied isn’t a hotbed of political correctness and “diversity” itself but it is located in a city which is). Amsterdam is the epicentre of political correctness, “diversity”, “multiculturalism” and so on.
      The “green-Left party” (Dutch: Groen-Links) usually gets very good results in Amsterdam. This is in contrast with electoral outcomes in nearby or surrounding towns and villages. During the last election for the senate/first chamber (translations into English vary) the province of North Holland (where Amsterdam is located) has overall seen an increase in support for the Forum for Democracy (Dutch: Forum voor Democratie) which has been labelled as a “right wing populist party” by the press (read: a party that doesn’t view Islam as a cultural enrichment). While many, many voters in the province of North Holland have voted for the Forum for Democracy, voters in Amsterdam have instead mostly voted for Green-Left.

      Amsterdam’s current mayor Femke Halsema has also announced that she doesn’t intend on enforcing or upholding the Dutch law banning face coverings in places like public transport, government buildings or schools. This refusal has caused in uproar in the rest of the Netherlands but not so much in Amsterdam itself.

      There is however one group that is being targeted in Amsterdam: tourists. Amsterdam has launched a campaign aimed (predominantly at young, male) tourists who come to the city for partying. The Guardian (the UK’s most left leaning newspaper) has covered the campaign quite favourably (if you wish to read about it search for e.g. “Amsterdammers v tourists: ‘It’s worst when they throw up in your plant box'” or “Amsterdam gets tough on antisocial behaviour from tourists “).

      So yes, there may indeed be something in the water or air in Amsterdam that makes it very different from its surroundings. I reckon that it may be a good idea for the Dutch parliament to think of another city they can make capital. Any other city really is going to be an improvement compared with Amsterdam.

      As for van Doorn I have no idea what is wrong with him. There isn’t really an awful lot of information about him or his life. He isn’t from Amsterdam but from The Hague. However one of his son’s allegedly also converted to Islam. So maybe there is something running the van Doorn family?

  6. Anke Leibrecht says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 1:15 pm

    Muslim women do not have to go sunbathing…with all their clothes on there is no benefit.
    There should be no specialized beaches for anyone other than reasonably traditional beach clothing.
    Why are we playing these games with them…..and their never ending demands ???

  7. European pagan says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 1:43 pm

    Europe is OUR home. Noone told muslims that they have to go to the beach. They dont have to. They can stay at home if they don’t like our haram beaches.

  8. jayell says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 2:23 pm

    Muslims have the sense to keep themselves covered because, quite frankly, they’re rarely particularly attractive. Also, since the average muslim female is on a high-reproduction schedule, they’re probably guaranteed to lose their figures pretty quickly and not be a particularly pleasant sight from their 20’s onwards. We have problems here in the UK with muslims wanting to appropriate time for themselves at public swimming baths (for which they never seem to pay) and I would wonder if their (lack of) aesthetic impact has something to do with that as well. Most of the 30+ muslim males that I have seen around my neck of the woods seem to need some kind of calorie-controlled diet and the older they get, the more they themselves seem to be needing the services of a maternity ward. So this highly insulting comment might be a a bit of defensive projection – as usual with muslims. And they’re forever wanting to claim territory for themselves, which is completely out of order but might be justified if they agreed to keep themselves OUT of everywhere else.

  9. CRUSADER says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 2:43 pm

    1/20th of beaches for 1/20th of population

    Only allow 1/20th skin to show at the beaches

  10. somehistory says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 2:44 pm

    “Muslims feel “unpleasant”
    *******************
    Because they are “unpleasant”….they behave in an “unpleasant” way and they say “unpleasant” things and they demand “unpleasant” things that cause the rest of mankind to look at them with a knowing look…knowing they are evil in their “unpleasantness.”

    “women in particular indicate that they are increasingly confronted with unwanted allusions and advances by people of the opposite sex ”
    ************************

    This part seems to be saying that normal females are being harassed by the moslim male who is feeling his “right” to claim these “scantily clad” people for himself. It certainly could not be that females in burkas…as in the photo…are being “confronted with unwanted allusions and advances”…especially the “advances.”

    And, asking again, just who is responsible for the broken glass on the beach in MI in the National Park? Must be someone feeling “unpleasant” with people enjoying themselves.

  11. Jean Terry says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 2:45 pm

    The more countries accede to the demands of Muslims the more the Muslims will take over and demand more. If they want to live like Muslims they should go back to the Middle East and live where they are comfortable.

  12. EVILSPEAK says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 2:57 pm

    They have a very strange perception of what’s ugly, then again they have no concept of what beauty is. Strange people Muslims.

    • Rufolino says

      Apr 20, 2019 at 3:48 am

      It appears the only thing beautiful to Islam is the death of an Unbeliever. There is little evidence they see beauty in anything else. The sensuous pleasures of art and music are banned. Rome has already covered up ststuary for Islam, and as things are going, later this century many beautiful things in Europe will be permanently covered up.

  13. elee says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 4:07 pm

    I posted this, deleted it, thought on it for a while, now I’m posting again. They can kiss my white ass.

  14. Naram-Sin says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 4:43 pm

    “Muslims feel uncomfortable with scantily clad, ugly people”

    Okay, the Muslims get their own beach and they can cover up, but how do they stop being ugly? I thought they were born that way.

  15. owensgate says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 6:12 pm

    “Their” rights as an “American”, (transposing the demand to the USA) are the most important thing in the World to them, after “sharia law”, but as soon as they take command and form “The United Islamic States of America”, OUR rights as Americans won’t be worth a rats patootie. The camel’s nose is in the tent, and there’s no getting rid of it.

  16. CRUSADER says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 6:31 pm

    ACT for America works to promote laws against Shariah….

    Check it out….

    ACTforAmerica.org/issues

  17. visnuduti (@visnuduti) says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 7:08 pm

    Veil covering comes from the time when woman in islam needed a male guard. Women in islam could not made their own decisions without the male guard, who is always a male relative. A son can make decisions for his own mother, like it is still common in Saudi Arabia. I don’t think that we in the West, need to follow any demands of muslums.The West has its own history, our political development has nothing to do with islam. We already devided religion and politics a long time ago. We don’t need to reintoduce medievian rules. Islam is interfiour to the West, so let them know it!

  18. ntesdorf says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 7:10 pm

    Anyone who goes bathing in the North Sea, scantily clad or in Niqab, deserves a Medal for Bravery.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 8:40 pm

      Actually, beaches in the Netherlands are often quite crowded:

      https://c8.alamy.com/comp/E45RR2/aerial-view-of-busy-beach-crowded-with-people-on-a-hot-august-weekend-E45RR2.jpg

  19. Acc358 says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 7:42 pm

    So the muslims are not happy with the Dutch beaches. There are plenty of halal beaches in the muslims countries. Problem solved!

  20. gravenimage says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 8:22 pm

    Netherlands: Muslim councilor wants halal beach: “Muslims feel uncomfortable with scantily clad, ugly people”

    According to Van Doorn, there is a need for a so-called “halal beach”. Muslims don’t feel at home on most beaches, he says. “Not only Muslims, but also many other residents feel uncomfortable with the appearance of very scantily dressed and often unesthetically designed beachgoers,” he writes to the city council of The Hague.
    …………………..

    Uh…right. And yet, it is not the Dutch clamoring for a “Halal beach” so they don’t have to look at “ugly” Infidels. i wonder why not? sarc/off

  21. Spiro says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 10:24 pm

    Aparently the west has no backbone to stand up to constant demands by Moslem parasites unless things change quickly
    Sharia law will become universal in Western Europe
    Then what happens

  22. Trouble says

    Apr 19, 2019 at 10:45 pm

    No beaches anywhere near where Mohamed crafted their book. Nothing to halal about.
    It’s another manipulative tactic to islamise and demoralise the west. But by all means provide a sand pit to make them feel at home!🌴
    The camels nose is in the tent-Coming soon to all Mediterranean tourist islands near you
    If someone does nothing.

  23. Mike says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 12:27 am

    Funny how in Israel, hijabis and bikinis share the same beach. Those (Jewish or Muslim) can go to the occasional sex-segregated bathing area behind walls.

    There is no push for this type of thing. Why? Because they know perfectly well that it would go nowhere. In the Netherlands, they’re not so sure. This type of push is opportunistic. That it so often works shows how badly detached Western societies in general are from their own values.

  24. mortimer says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 12:40 am

    ISLAMIC VEILING comes from Koran 33.59 which declares that Muslim women will not be IDENTIFIED as Muslims and thus be rapable if they don’t wear their Islamic UNIFORM … namely, the veil.

    The Islamic covering is an unspoken threat of RAPE to kafir women.

    Let them go back to Berzerkistan if they don’t like the West as it is.

    • PRCS says

      Apr 20, 2019 at 1:45 am

      PRCS says

      Apr 19, 2019 at 9:58 pm

      Hijabi #1 states that there are two purposes for hijab (which, btw, is not just a headscarf):

      1. Modesty.
      As far as I know, any ‘modesty’ it represents is a cultural imperative forced upon Muslim women by Muslim men who don’t want other men to see ‘their women’.

      2. “..it represents Islam.”
      When out among unrelated men, that is its true meaning.

      *Qur’an 24:31
      “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

      Primarily by Muslim men.

      *Qur’an 24:31
      “And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment.”

      For those who don’t already know, slaves are what Muslims’ right hands possess.

      *And there’s this from a Muslim–I assume)–to a Muslim site):

      Is hijab wajib (obligatory) for a slave woman?
      https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/39109/is-hijab-wajib-obligatory-for-a-slave-woman

      *And, while this devout little Utah Muslima correctly stated the purpose of ‘covering up’, the filthy unbelievers at the table with her apparently didn’t catch what she said:

      “A woman that doesn’t wear the hijab is most likely to get sexual assault and abuse than a woman that does wear it, ’cause she covers up.”

      If she clicked her heels together–three times–she might get back in Iraq.

      https://fox13now.com/2018/11/15/letter-encourages-schools-to-adopt-religious-clothing-guidelines-after-boy-rips-girls-hijab-off-during-recess/

  25. Trouble says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 2:46 am

    The excuse to have a segregated area would
    have less to do with feeling uncomfortable with scantily clothed ugly Infidels and much to do with not wanting to bath with non- muslims at all as that would be haram.
    Co -religionists in Pakistan strictly prohibit non muslims sharing drinking water with them with death as punishment. Look up Asia Bibi .
    Or is that blessing reserved for Christians only?
    An ancient cultural tradition belonging to a civilisation alien to them and expect it to change to their advantage.Whats alarming is that people would entertain such thought,. If bathers along with an encyclopaedia of European customs offend you, what do you want and why come here? Netherlands has a high population of Turks and Turkey with segregated halal beaches it’s not difficult to see where this is coming from. The brotherhood stirrer.

  26. na says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 2:55 am

    Ban sharia halal porn sites. that contains child porno .

  27. Tana says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 3:20 am

    Oh ugh why should they even go out at all only want some land of their own to “enrich” the beaches

    https://islamqa.info/en/answers/159926/is-it-permissible-for-women-to-go-to-swimming-pools

    Askin the other crap is the line that mo “encouraged women to stay at home. Moreover, if a woman becomes accustomed to that she will become very attached to it because she is subject to her emotions, and in that case she will become distracted from her religious or worldly duties and she will always be talking about these activities in gatherings. And if the woman does such things that will be a cause of her losing sense of shame and modesty”

  28. David M says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 4:53 am

    “In addition, women in particular indicate that they are increasingly confronted with unwanted allusions and advances by people of the opposite sex during beach visits.”

    Really, men find fat ugly Muslim women clad from head to toe in a garbage bag attractive & proposition them? I find that hard to believe.

  29. Fritz says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 5:10 am

    Just wait until they become a majority. And then find out THE HARDEST WAY POSSIBLE how they treat minority requests…

  30. Joe says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 5:18 am

    “On halal beaches, Muslims could enjoy the sun according to their religious regulations.”
    ————————————————————————————
    If they are going to be covered head to toe, then how are they going to enjoy the sun?

    The real argument is that they don’t want to be a part of Dutch society, because it is forbidden for them to mix with non-Muslims.

    It is part of their “religion”; they will break any and all laws to impose Islam on everyone else. That can only be accomplished by remaining separate from everyone else. To this end, they certainly don’t want to socialize with non-Muslims at the beach.

  31. Lauren Hermann says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 6:40 am

    “Muslims feel “unpleasant with scantily clad, ugly people.”

    At the risk of having this comment rejected I just have this to say:

    Uh–ugly people?? I have never seen such butt-ugly people as these creatures. There’s a reason that muslim conquerors raped Icelandic women, but the Vikings didn’t rape muslim women. Everyone has limits, except muslims.

  32. Steven says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 6:55 am

    BRING BACK GEERT WILDERS, WE REALLY NEED HIM TO BE PRIME MINISTER TO STOP THIS RACISM NONSENSE!!!!!

  33. Steven says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 7:19 am

    How about we have all beaches in Netherlands for non-muslims only in order to protect the women and children from harassment and rapes by male muslims?

  34. Kay says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 8:44 am

    The logic is faulty.
    To arrive at the nude beach in regular swimwear would not be illegal. And to be nude on the regular beach is illegal.

    So — is it illegal to be in a burka on the regular beach? No? Then why would they need a separate one? Would it be permissible to be in regular beach attire on the halal beach? No? Then they have done more and different than nude beaches do. Then they would have taken over part of the land as separatists.

  35. Lal says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 8:57 am

    Show respect for OUR culture and western values or go home. This is our land not yours, you chose to come here we didn’t make you. Put up Or shut up!

  36. skeen66 says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 9:03 am

    This is a laugh. How can Muslim women “enjoy the sun” at the beach, when they’re garbed, head to toe, in rugs and draperies? Speaking of “unesthetically designed beachgoers,” imagining at a truly naked Muslimi comes near to picturing Maxine Waters or Hillary Clinton in the shower without a wig. Count the layers of fat! Note her unsightly, moonish form! She’s “oppressed.” Her ideal “look” is as a Disney hippopotamas. She’s as distant from the conception of female beauty (think of Melania Trump) as Pluto is from the sun.

  37. Craig W says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 9:15 am

    “Muslims feel uncomfortable …”
    Well, I “feel uncomfortable” with 3rd century throwbacks ashamed of our natural form.

  38. Terra Nova says

    Apr 20, 2019 at 1:53 pm

    Hey, van Doorn, are you sure you are a Dutchman and do you have the slightest idea what is happening in the world? For muslims to look at the Ugly white ones, my God, you must not know at all beauty from the inside or beauty from the outside, seek your own beach, but pls outside the Netherlands, I know several good places in the world where you can go to, they have lots of sand there, but with so much muslim beauties around you, I am sure you would not mind. Van Doorn a new name on the list, your name means”Thorn”
    . And you are a big thorn in a lot of peoples eyes, and in the end it will sting “YOU” and might infect you !!!

  39. Wesley Mooch says

    Apr 22, 2019 at 4:56 am

    Why have so many western european politicians & citizens forgotten what WW2 was about, and the ultimate price countless of millions paid in lives lost so that the survivors could live in freedom, that they seemingly so flippantly discard their heritage and traditional societies?

  40. Jophiel says

    Apr 22, 2019 at 11:23 am

    The best solution would be for Muslims to go and live in coutries where the culture fully embraces their faith — Arab countries, for example. They would feel very comfortable there. Let the rest of the world live according to their beliefs and culture as well. Isn’t it?

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • James Lincoln on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.