In the 20th century, the world’s population increased four times and exceeded 6.5 billion people. the demographic change in the recent decades has seen a rapid growth in the number of Muslims. Since 1990, the number of Muslims in the world has increased from 880 million to 1 billion people. Islam became the fastest growing world religion in terms of the number of adherents, and according to current forecasts, by 2030 there will be at least two billion Muslims on earth out of a total population of 8 billion.
Currently, Islam is already the second largest religion in terms of followers (after Christianity). More than two thirds of Muslims live in Asia, where they constitute over 20% of the population, and almost 30% in Africa (half of the continent’s population). Muslim communities exist in more than 120 countries of the world, in 35 of them they constitute over 80% of the population (most of them are in the countries of North Africa and West Asia). The largest absolute Muslim communities reside in Indonesia, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Sociologists predict that by 2025 in the US, the Islamic community will become the second largest after Christians, overtaking the Jewish one.
Especially rapidly increasing is the number of Muslims in Europe. The largest Muslim community is in France: from 5 to 7 million (up to 10% of the total population), Islam became the second largest religion in the country after Catholicism. Numerous communities of followers of Islam were formed in Germany (4 million), Great Britain (1.7 million), Italy and Holland (1 million each). Significant Muslim communities are scattered throughout all Western European countries.
It should be noted that no one knows the real number of Muslims in Western Europe, since along with the legal immigrants and their descendants, there are many millions of illegal immigrants who are absent in official statistics. According to various estimates, between 15 and 24 million Muslims now live in Western Europe. Demographers predict that by 2025 the number of Muslims in Europe will double due to the high birth rate and mass immigration from North Africa and the Middle East.
Islam came to Western Europe just a few decades ago. Until the end of the 1940s, there were very few Muslims. (most in France – 120 thousand in the mid-1920s). The first mass migration was associated with the war in Algeria (1954-1962). After the forced consent of France to the declaration of independence of this North African states, hundreds of thousands of local Muslims took advantage of the opportunity to move to their former metropolis.
As a result of mass migrations from developing countries, the level of ethnic and denominational fragmentation of the population of those European states that were quite homogeneous a few decades ago is constantly increasing. It is fundamentally important that, unlike in past years, a significant part of Muslim migrants and their descendants now do not show a desire to integrate into a new environment for themselves.
The former European model of building a single civic nation within the framework of a national state (like the “melting pot” in the USA) in modern conditions ceases to work. Consequences of this are the concepts of building multicultural, multi-religious, and more recently, multilingual communities within individual states of Western Europe. For adherents of liberalism, these concepts seem to be a logical development of democracy, where minority rights are guaranteed and protected by the state. At the same time, no distinction is made between the “old” and the “new” population: their rights to an original existence are equally protected by a democratic state.
Muslim areas and suburbs appeared in Paris, Berlin, London and many other major European cities. Most modern French Muslims are descendants of the Arab Maghreb (Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco). In Germany, Netherlands, Austria and Denmark, the Muslim community is mainly represented by descendants of Turkish immigrants. British Muslims – most descendants of immigrants from British India (Pakistan and Bangladesh).
The increase in the number of European Muslims is promoted by the high fertility rate encouraged by state social programs. In Muslim families, the average number of children is usually not less than four. Large Muslim families contrasts with the small families and the crisis of traditional family values among the indigenous Europeans. The most important democratic achievement of modern Western civilization proclaimed freedom of homosexual relations, and in a number of countries (Holland, Belgium, Canada, Spain and Switzerland, as well as a number of US states) same-sex marriages were legally allowed.
Along with the increase in the number of sexual minorities, the reduction of the indigenous (atheistic or nominally Christian) population of Western Europe is promoted by the conscious rejection of the birth of children, as many Europeans believe that children will interfere with their careers or simply interfere with their usual and comfortable life. Families that have one child, rarely decide on the birth of the second. For simple reproduction of the population, the average birth rate should be 2.1 children. But women in Western Europe, on average, give birth to only 1.4 children. And in the conditions of a progressive decline in the indigenous population of Europe, Muslims successfully fill the demographic vacuum that has formed.
This plays into the feminist propaganda, which asserts that children prevent women from occupying a worthy place in society. The rejection of traditional family values and the moral crisis of society contribute to the growth of the popularity of Islam, even among the indigenous people of Europe. In France, the number of white French Muslims already exceeds 50 thousand, and this far exceeds, for example, the number of Russian Muslims in Russia.
For several decades, the difficulties of a demographic and economic nature have forced the EU countries to legalize and even promote immigration from Muslim countries. European politicians considered it indecent even to ask the question, is modern Europe and Islam compatible in principle? Both did not preached the ideas of tolerance and multiculturalism as for Islam for example unlike what Islam Claims, incompatible with the views of Samuel Huntington, who in his sensational book “The Clash of Civilizations” claimed that Europe and Islam are two antipodes, two initially hostile antagonistic civilizations. On the contrary, the prevailing view was that the integration of the Muslim diaspora into European society would contribute to the rapprochement of Christian and Islamic civilizations.
The rationale for such optimistic ideas were examples when yesterday’s illiterate migrant workers or their descendants successfully fit into European reality, made a successful career, and even became members of the European Parliament. But widely propagated examples of this kind were sporadic; they did not reflect the real picture and only disoriented society, and indeed the political elite of Western Europe.
It is characteristic that, unlike the first wave of immigrants, the rejection of the surrounding reality among Muslims of the second and third generation constantly increased and acquired more and more radical forms. Already in the second half of the 1990s, young Muslims in Europe began to become increasingly intolerant of such European values as sexual equality, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, ensuring the rights of sexual minorities, etc. In schools that were attended by young Muslims, it became increasingly difficult to teach certain subjects. Over the years, in many schools it has become impossible to teach the history of the Holocaust, the theory of the origin of life, the development of species and humanity, as well as a number of other subjects that seemed completely unacceptable for young Muslims and their parents.
Gradually, in schools with Muslim students, sexual segregation was established: the boys sat down in one part of the class, and the girls – in the other, in hospitals the refusals of treatment by a male doctor or a man – by women became more frequent. Only ten years ago, only old women wore Muslim headscarves. Now they are worn by half of the female Muslim population of France, and in some municipalities of France this figure reaches 80%. Hijabs are increasingly common in other European countries.
Young Muslims in Europe no longer limit themselves to living under the laws of the land. In most cases, Muslim girls and women were not free to choose: many were forced to wear hijabs under the pressure of relatives or the community. According to special studies conducted by the French authorities, in some European cities, a Muslim girl who refuses to wear a headscarf “risks exposure to insults, physical aggression, sexual abuse and even collective rape.” In France, such acts of aggression against dissenters within the Muslim community occur regularly. The growth of Islamic fundamentalism among European Muslims created favorable conditions for the politicization of Islam in Europe.
Until the late 1990s Islamist political parties did not exist in Europe. Now they have appeared in France and Belgium. While these parties are not numerous and are not represented in parliament, they already have their first successes: in Belgium in May 2003, “Parti de la Citoyennete et Prosperite” (PCP, Citizenship and Prosperity Party), which preaches radical Islam, gained more than 8 thousand votes in the Brussels elections.
Over the past four years, hundreds of acts of aggression by Muslim youth have been witnessed in European cities, and the number of anti-Semitic demonstrations is constantly growing. According to sociologists, European Muslims do not show tolerance for their fellow citizens in precisely those countries that are most tolerant.
As shown by a sociological study conducted by the pew Washington Research Center in 13 western states, in the UK, while there is the most tolerant attitude of indigenous people towards Muslim immigrants in Europe, there is the most open dislike of Muslims towards Europeans.
In most countries, suspicion and contempt for each other, Muslims and non-Muslims are mostly mutual. But in the UK there is a huge gap in this regard. 63% of Britons treat Muslims positively, this figure has only slightly decreased since 2004 due to explosions in the London Underground. In France, such an attitude can be seen among approximately 60% of citizens, while in the USA, Germany and Spain this figure does not exceed 29%.
Only a third of Britons consider Muslims as cruel and hostile, whereas in Spain about 60% of indigenous people hold this opinion, in Germany – 52%, in the US – 45%, in France – 41%. At the same time, it is in Great Britain that the most negative attitude of local Muslims towards European values is noted in the West. Most of the representatives of the British Ummah consider the people of the Western world to be selfish, arrogant, greedy and immoral. In the rest of the countries, the majority of Muslims share the respect for Europeans towards women, but in the UK, less than half of Muslim citizens agree with this.
In the UK, only 32% of Muslims are tolerant towards the Jewish community, whereas, for example, in France this figure is 71%. Finally, it is British Muslims who less than others believe in the possibility of their existence in Western society while maintaining the traditional way of life and adherence to conservative values.
At the same time, citizens of Great Britain showed the greatest sympathy, in contrast to other states, for Muslims in the context of a “caricature” scandal. Only 9% of the British respondents believe that the conflicts between Islam and the West that arose on this ground were the result of “Muslim intolerance towards Western freedom”, but about three-quarters of the respondents blamed “disrespect of the West towards Muslims” The same is believed in Muslim countries. 55% of Americans and 2/3 of Germans and French believe that relations between people of the West and Muslims in general leave much to be desired. Some optimism can be had only by the fact that, as studies have shown, in the Muslim communities of Europe, Muslim attitude to the Europeans are still better than in Muslim countries.
At the beginning of the third millennium, European Muslims became an active political force. In the spring and summer of 2001, mass rallies were held by British Muslims in the factory cities of central England. In 2002, during the parliamentary elections in France, mass demonstrations of French Muslims greatly paralyzed the activity of right-wing Populist National Front. European Muslims in many respects contributed to the development by Europe of an independent position on the issue of the war in Iraq in 2003. In the winter of 2003/2004. large-scale actions of European Muslims were held, which were directed against the ban by the French Ministry of Education on wearing the hijab in schools. In European cities, mass marches are constantly taking place in support of the Palestinian people, against the policies of the United States and Israel.
Some Islamic leaders demanded autonomy for European Muslims. Thus, the director of the Muslim Institute Kaleem Siddiqi (one of the leaders of Islamic radicals in the UK) in his “Muslim manifesto” demanded that British Muslims be given the status of an “autonomous community”.
Europe has become an arena for the activities of Islamic terrorists who organized the bombings in Madrid and London, as well as the murder of the Dutch director Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam. At the same time, terrorism is generated not only by internal causes, but also by the processes that occur within the Muslim communities of Europe. Many Muslims who participated in the terrorist attack on the USA on September 11, 2001, were Muslims from European countries. Their worldview was shaped in Europe, where favorable conditions were established for the dissemination of the ideas of radical Islam, which rejects liberal and democratic values.
The majority of those who committed the terrorist attacks on March 11, 2004 in Madrid were also young Muslims belonging to the second or third generation of immigrants. They were not associated with foreign terrorist organizations, although they claimed to be al Qaeda followers. The group included residents of Madrid and full-fledged citizens of Spain (mostly of Moroccan origin), who were inspired by the ideas of jihad, influenced by the information they gathered on the Internet on radical Islamic websites. The same picture was observed in the UK, where the London attacks of July 7, 2005 were also carried out by young Muslims – full-fledged British citizens.
Islam has become a major factor in European public life. Without taking this factor into account, no serious forecast of the future development of Europe, or of the entire modern world, is possible. A significant part of the Muslims of Europe did not integrate into European reality and consciously refuses to accept the Western European way of life, morality and values. Refusing European identity, they make a choice in favor of “pure” Islam in its Arabian variety and feel themselves primarily as part of the global Muslim community.
The current demographic situation strengthens Muslims in the belief that sooner or later Western Europe will become part of the Islamic world. Among them there is the conviction that the womb of a Muslim woman has become the most effective means of Islamizing Europe and the whole world. Some analysts claim that in the very near future, France will become the first Islamic country in Western Europe, from which Islam will begin its triumphal march through the rest of the continent.
European states have achieved great and unconditional success in defending the democratic rights and freedoms of their citizens. This fully applies to the rights of minorities living in them: religious, ethnic, sexual. The result of this liberal policy was the growing ethno-confessional fragmentation of Europe. But after all, such ethno-confessional fragmentation has always been one of the main features of developing countries. In most of them, such a mosaic caused a heightened conflict in society. The internal political instability caused by it still remains the most important cause of socio-economic stagnation, even social degradation, which are observed in many developing countries.
An increasing number of Muslims prefer to live within their own community, solely by their own laws, and not even speak the languages of their countries of residence. It is precisely this behavior of Muslims that is fundamentally different from the behavior of other minorities (Chinese, Indian, Eastern European, etc.), who, while preserving their cultural traditions and identity, still strive to adapt and integrate into the society where they now live.
Obviously, the more numerous the Islamic segments that are not integrated into the local society, the higher the potential for conflict of the society and the more favorable the ground appears for the activities of radical Islamist groups.
It must be emphasized that Islam, like any other religion, does not in itself pose a threat to the world and society. The threat arises only when Islam ceases to be a religion and begins to be used as a political ideology that is designed to seize power in individual countries, regions or on a planetary scale by the name of creating the future World Caliphate.
In the conditions of the development of a special policy towards Muslims built on the liberal values of European society, their very isolation from the number of other minorities seems to be an absolutely unacceptable violation of democracy. The persistent desire to ignore the specifics of Muslim problems led to the fact that such extremists as Egyptian Abu Hamza, without any problems, received British citizenship and for many years lived quietly in the UK, engaging in terrorist activities.
For European liberalism, it would be unthinkable to enact legislation similar to, for example, the recently adopted Australian decree on Arab-Muslim immigrants, from which “the government feels threatened by terrorist attacks.” This decree states that “Muslims who want to live in Australia under Sharia law will have to leave this country.” In Europe, the statements that Islam is a threat to society entail accusations of racism and prosecution.
Catholic priest pere Samuel, popular in Belgium, the rector of the church of St. Anthony of Padua in Charleroi, was accused by the authorities of racism for pointing out the threat of Islamic expansion in Europe in his sermon. “There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim,” said this priest, who was born in the family of Syrian Christians in Turkish Kurdistan. In his speech on local television, he called every Muslim child born in Europe “a time bomb for children of European culture who will soon become a minority here.”
It is noteworthy that the initiators of the prosecution of pere Samuel were not Islamic organizations, but the Belgian government human rights organization Center for Equal Opportunities and Resistance to Racism, which qualified his statements as “incitement to racial hatred” and even recommended that Father Samuel be detained until a court verdict was rendered.
Will the growth of the Muslim population lead to the Islamization of Europe? Many radical Islamic leaders no longer doubt this. As one of them said after the death of Pope John Paul II, “Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and winner after he was twice expelled from the continent.” After that, “only one choice will be presented to Christians – to accept Islam or pay jizya (i.e., a tax levied on non-Muslims for the right to reside in an Islamic country).
European politicians may continue to pretend that Muslims are no different from other minorities. But further mechanical following along the path of liberalism cannot solve the problem, the existence of which is obvious. It leads only to the further isolation of local Muslims, the growth of the influence of radical political Islam in their midst, which may soon become a real threat to domestic political stability and the very existence of modern European civilization. And the longer the local authorities turn a blind eye to the Islamic problem, the more difficult it will be to find adequate methods for the solution.
The future prospects of Europe will primarily depend on whether European states are able to develop an adequate policy in relation to the growing and less and less integrated society of Muslim communities. Such a policy should not only guarantee all rights, preserve the religious and cultural identity of European Muslims, but also harmonize their relations with society and ensure the integration of Muslims into modern European civilization.
If a still prosperous Europe does not find an adequate way out of this difficult situation, then its development can be reversed and take the path of degradation. In this case, it is not at all the current developing countries that will catch up with the developed ones, but, on the contrary, Europe will be at the level of developing states. At present, such a development is still not fatally inevitable, and one would like to hope that Europe (like all humanity) will not be discarded during the darkest Middle Ages and religious wars.
Walter Sieruk says
One of the main goals of many jihad –minded Muslims is the Islamic conquest of the nations of Europe. One of the methods of achieving Muslin object by not necessary by the means of the violent and deadly “militant” jihad but by the subtle, sly, subversive and insidious way of engaging in that which is known as the stealth jihad. This type of jihad for the advancement and control of Islam in the European countries is to infiltrate into, as in gain, access to, the governmental institutions of the nations of Europe.
This is a large and great part of the grand scheme of stealth jihadist agenda to enhance and gain strong and then stronger influence and then supreme control of Islam over the whole continent of Europe. As on scholar on Islam and the Muslim zeal -filled intentions for Islam had revealed that “Of all the continents of the World, Europe is probably the number one target by Muslim strategists who are seeking world
dominance…” [1] of course ,this author means “world dominance. , Not for those specific Muslim themselves but “world dominance for Islam.” Likewise, another scholar r and expert on this subject wrote exposed that “Since the stealth jihad is more advance in Europe then in the United States, the situation there is more dire….Muslims are accomplishing today what they have tried but failed to do for over a millennium : conquer Europe.” [2] Most intelligent people will well understand that “As Europe goes so will in time, go North America.
Further, about this Muslim scheme of the stealth jihad otherwise called the Muslim method of Islamic Gradualism to enact Sharia law in many different countries of Europe is in contrast to the way of the violent jihad or also called the militant jihad .This non-violent form of the jihad for Islam is a very sly, insidious, subtle and deceptive way of working for the advancement of Islam.
This Muslim scheme for achieving the goal of the Islamic agenda is as, many times, as subtly effective as it is demonically clever. Furthermore, this Islamic gradualism, in some ways, is very similar to the instruction printed in the book entitled THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tzu. Which reads “At first, then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening; afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to opposes you”
In addition, those scheming stealth jihadist /Muslims who attempt to have Sharia law set up in the countries of Europe do also engage in the doctrine of the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya which is very insidious. Taqyyia is the jihad dogma that deception is a good thing to do as long as it’s done for the advancement of Islam. Nevertheless, the God of the Bible “condemns those who devise wicked schemes…” Proverbs 12:11. [N.I.V.] Likewise, Proverbs 12:20 teaches “Deceit is in the hearts of those who plot evil.”
[1] How Islam Plans to Change the World by Willian Wagner , page 195.
[2] STEALTH JIHAD by Robert Spencer , page 270.
Keys says
Thank you, Walter.
Pieter says
Walter’s explanation is 100% the way islam works on different front’s.
K WAGNER says
The WORLD Needs To Note:
Muslims Will Not Abort Their Offspring
And Our WELFARE Will Support Them!
Even though they will NOT work or earn their keep, commit crimes, rape and murder, The West will still support them at taxpayer expense.!!!!!!!
Carol the 1st says
Some kind of extermination is needed as a blight is upon the land. Any good farmer can Google the Earth and guess the odds of third world inhabitants enriching everyone:
FPV #50 – Geopolitics, And The Ecology Of Migration
Carol the 1st says
In Canada that’s about $5,400 per child and with no limit. One non-working muslim neighbour had five children, cleaned out the food banks (and traded or sold surpluses) and a handful of years later bragged about how she now had a five bedroom home in a lovely area. I can see where the money came from – baby farming.
jarmanray says
In an attempt to change the EU’s socialist/Islamic influence in its parliament in Brussels, Viktor Orbán announced his seven-step program to save Christian civilization as reported by BNI:
1. The issue of migration shall be taken away from Brussels and handed over to the nation-states,
2. No country shall be obliged to accept migrants,
3. Nobody shall be allowed to enter Europe without valid documentation,
4. Migrant-cards and migrant-visas shall be abolished,
5. Brussels shall stop funding migration-aiding Soros-NGOs,
6. Nobody shall be reprimanded for being Christian in Europe,
7. All EU institutions shall be lead by anti-immigration leaders.
I think that he should have went further by stating that a “Freedom of Speech and Association” clause should be written into the EU’s jurisprudence system. As has been reported today here at JW and by Pam Geller, grandmothers and priests are being persecuted for simply stating the truth about muslims and their love of sharia. We in America should be concerned also as the press attempts to shield and advocate for the Democrat/anti-Semitic & Israel/Communist party with its emphasis on Tlaib and Omar who are the water carriers for the regime.
Terry Gain says
The past tense of lead is led.
Walter Sieruk says
This is a very fitting time to reiterate the warning that regarding those Muslim migrants who were allowed to enter the different countries of Western Europe with result in them not only being ungrateful but even worse yet many of those Muslim migrants becoming so very arrogant to the point that they became criminals . As in some of them engaged in rioting and even rapes of the European girls and women. In addition to this vile brutal behavior by the heinous Muslim who were kindly permitted to enter the nations of Europe to live, As the countries of ,for example France, Germany Sweden, Denmark etc.
This unthankful Islamic spirit on the part of those lawless violent Muslims who immigrated to the countries of Europe may be explain, in part, by the fact that the Muslim fundamentalist group that even had the president of Egypt assassinated in the month of October of the year 1981 has a fifty –five booklet that is was written only for Muslims fundamentalists but was later discover by non-Muslims. This booklet’s title is THE NEGLECTED DUTY. One scholar, Johannes Jansen who had thoroughly investigated Islam and Islamic terrorism has even discover that those Muslims, who had entered Europe of behaved in violent and heinous ways, are actually action out what they view and a sacred individual duty of the jihad as by engaging in awful violent criminal action in non-Muslim lands . As Jansen revealed that jihad booklet of Islam, THE NEGLECTED DUTY “contains all the ideological material needed to justify the attacks of 9/11 or any other acts of terror committed to frighten non-Muslims. And he thinks the document explains the criminal behavior of suburban and center –city immigrant youngsters in many European cities; its author clearly ‘sees Islam as license to kill rob and commit arson.’ “ [1]
Nevertheless, many of the apologists for Islam still have that blatant gall , in spite of all the facts of reality, to actually make the claim the Islam is a “peaceful religion.” What a totally false to make that Islam is “a peaceful religion “What Bull! A “peaceful religion” indeed.
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM by Ibn Warraq pages 308, 309.
Walter Sieruk says
There are some well meaning but terribly naive Europeans who sincerely feel that they can change vicious and violent way of thinking of a jihadist Muslim by showing him kindness and even love. Those naive but well-meaning people express that idea they have by the words “Have you hugged ad terrorist today?” The harsh reality is that the only reason the a jihadist would let that person to get so close to him, as to embrace in a “hug” is to get close enough to literally stab that person in the back. This may be yet better explained by one of the fables of Aesop which is entitled THE FARMER AND THE VIPER. So here it is “Once in ancient Greece there was a farmer outside on a very cold winter day walking in if field to make sure that everything is in order and as it should be. The farmer came upon a half-froze viper about to die from the bitter cold. The kind yet foolish farmer took pity on the viper and in an action of kindness put it his is vest jacket to warms and up and thus save its life. The viper warned up revived and then bit farmer through the vest jacket. So the kind but foolish farmer died a slow painful death in awful agony because he felt sorry of the viper and saved it life.” The point to this fable is the no amount of kindness will chance an evil and dangerous nature.
Those jihadist have they dangerous and evil nature because they are hopelessly infected by hard core non-watered down Qu ‘ran based violent jihad Islam.
Ronne S says
A man found a frozen snake, took the snake into his house, put the snake before the fireplace to thaw out, the snake thawed out, slithered over to the man and bit him, the man asked the snake “why did you bit me” the snake said “you knew I was a snake when you brought me in”
Walter Sieruk says
Now is the appropriate time to restate the very important message that many jihad-minded Muslims have the Islamic agenda and quest to conquer the nations of the West for Islam. Either “by hook or by crook” as in by engaging in the stealth jihad or in the violent and deadly “jihad of the sword.” Likewise part of all this in is by the Muslim infiltration of the Western countries which is being accomplished by the great number of Muslim migrants who are entering the Western nations.
As a Former Muslim had revealed in his book when he wrote that “there has been large –scale immigration into the West, from Islamic nations…of Muslims who are implacably hostile to the West, have no desire to learn why the West became so rich and tolerant , and certainly have no desire to assimilate. They feel no gratitude of allegiance to their Western host nations; their only obligations are to fellow Muslims.”
The author further clarifies by adding. “The mere presence of so many Muslims in the West had affected the domestic and international behavior of governments, whose foreign policy is dominated by fear of offending their Muslim population ready to riot on the slightest pretext. Those unassimilated Muslims are committed to introducing Islamic laws in the West. , and they are able to do so cleverly exploiting the freedoms created over the centuries by the infidels.” [1]
As for that above statement that the “Muslim population [is] ready to riot on the slightest pretext…” This is valid evidence that the old saying is true .Which is that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.”
On this very important subject another scholar in his book informs the reader that “Islamic involvement in the political process is much more advanced in Europe than in the United States.” and he further makes it known that “Of all the continents of the world, Europe is probably the number one target by Muslim strategists who are seeking world dominance.” [2]
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM by Ibn Warraq, page 354
[2] HOW ISLAM PLANS TO CHANCE THE WORLD by William Wagner , pages 176, 195.
Walter Sieruk says
In this jihadwatch site ,this year, it had bee revealed that of the different nations of Europe as a whole 91% of the victims of Islamic violence ,as in many cases deadly Islamic violence .The jihadists use firearms as well as using bombs .Even using themselves as human bombs time bombs ,just waiting to go off in the many cities of Europe . It only takes a few out of many to inflect much murderous harm.
Those jihadists who engage in Islamic suicide/homicide bombings attacks is for a large part, the outcome the extreme brainwashing that is performed in Islamic mind programming centers which are mosques and madrasas. In those jihad mind control places students are thoroughly indoctrinated into the jihadist mindset of committing murderous bombing attacks in the jihad for the advancement of Islam. As Islam’s “holy book,” the Quran instructs in 9:111. , for example, “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain they kill and are killed.” Therefore, those who come out of those Quran based mind programming centers .mosque and madrasas, are so terribly harmed and damaged that they are literally, as it has be rightfully called, “dangerous to self and others.” This results in jihad suicide /homicide attack in which those jihadists who commit such murderous actions are so very deluded that they think of that jihad mass murders as “martyrdom operations.” This is Islamic delusion of the most heinous and malicious kind.
This may be, somewhat, explained by the narrative from the fable of Aesop which is entitled THE SCORPION AND THE FROG So “Once upon a time there was a scorpion who really wanted to get to the other side of the river, but he could not swim. Therefore, the scorpion begged a frog to carry him on his back across the river. The kind but foolish frog agreed and then half-way across the river the scorpion stung the frog. In shock and horror the dying frog asks the scorpion “Why did you sting me since this means that we both are going to die” The scorpion replied “The reason that I stung you even though we both will now die is because that just what a scorpion, by nature, does.”
In conclusion, just as that scorpion in the fable had proven himself by the dangerous and deadly, to self and others, because of his nature. The violent and murderous jihadists of Islam are as that scorpion, dangerous so self and other because they is their nature because they have been thought programmed in the ways of the violent and murdering jihad of Islam. As always stated above ,this is the sad and tragic reality of Islamic terrorism in today’s world.
Terry Gain says
This is a great article for anyone interested in learning about the threat that Islam poses for western democracies. An alternative caption would be: IT’S THE IDEOLOGY, STUPID.
Walter Sieruk says
To Terry Gain , you are 100% right when, concerning Islam and Muslim terrorism , when you keyboarded “IT’S THE IDEOLOGY STUPID.” To add to this ,it should be added that it’s the Islamic theology of the Qur ‘an the instructs in violence and killing for the cause of Islam, 2:919 5:33 9:111. 47:4. which the the foundation of the murderous Islamic ideology.
In other words, the Islamic theology deadly violence upholds and supports the Islamic ideology of deadly violence for Islam
gravenimage says
The Islamization of Europe and the European Caliphate
…………………
Very good–and very important–article.
The only point I would take issue with is that feminism is the reason native Europeans turn to Islam. Given that the largest demographic for conversion to Islam is in prisons among violent felons, I don’t think these newly-minted Muslims were ever particularly keen on equal rights for women.
Wellington says
An absolutely stunning paragraph in this article which I take great issue with, to wit
“It must be emphasized that Islam, like any other religion, does not in itself pose a threat to the world and society. The threat arises only when Islam ceases to be a religion and begins to be used as a political ideology that is designed to seize power in individual countries, regions or on a planetary scale by the name of creating the future World Caliphate.”
This paragraph is appalling either because it is rooted in massive ignorance or massive deception. As though every other religion is not a threat either unless it too becomes a political ideology, yada, yada, yada.
Holy Hell, Islam IS not only a religion but ALSO a political ideology. If you take the political ideology out of Islam you gut it like a fish. About no other major faith can this remotely be said. Not for nothing did Bertrand Russell, almost a century ago, in his The Theory and Practice of Bolzhevism compare Islam to both Marxism and fascism by way of noting that Islam is THE ONLY major faith which is totalitarian in both structure and ideology. What the hell is the writer of this article talking about by asserting that Islam is OK unless it becomes political? You cannot separate Islam from politics unless you want some fantasy version of Islam.
Yeah, if only Islam just stays a religion, everything will be fine. Only if it gets political, then…….
As I said above, simply stunning. And thus herewith I assert that I take a MAJOR issue with this article. Would be deuce difficult to be more MAJOR. Done here (for now).
Wellington says
I need to add more here because I am disgusted by this article. The World Caliphate “thingy” aside, you still have in mainstream Islam such “factors” as death for apostasy (e.g., Sura 4:89), polygamy sanctioned (which guarantees women will have an inferior status to men), the hitting of women (e.g., Sura 4:34), death or severe punishment for any criticism of Islam, Mo or his wretched holy book, vile anti-semitism, antipathy towards all non-Muslims which can be found on most every page of the Koran (e.g., Sura 98:6), no Golden Rule for all but rather just for Muslims, the “best of peoples” rot (Sura 3:110), et al.
There is much, much, much more wrong about Islam than just the World Caliphate garbage. Put the World Caliphate crap aside, even politics if you can, and you still have pernicious nonsense galore, some of which I just mentioned above. And once again I assert that taking politics out of Islam leaves you with a fantasy version of Islam. Damn, I’m angry here.
Joe Murphy says
Wellington, you spotted exactly what I spotted and what you said included exactly what I would have said.
The paragraph is wrong, totally wrong, and surprising to see at Jihadwatch. Yet there is a saying ‘do not attribute to malice what is due to incompetence’. And I don’t mean that this writer is in general incompetent as a person, a writer, or a political thinker — far from it, from the nature of the article.
Rather, I see that this writer has not cast off some deep incompetence which is normal in the Western liberal mind. I doubt that this statement is intentionally made to validate Islam as such, but that it is more likely semi-consciously as if to virtue-signal his purity to the great mob of Western liberals, and what they assume about religions. In short, I suspect that the main impulse in writing this was a self-purity signal, am impulsive proof that the writer is not unclean, not a validation of Islam.
It might be useful for Robert Spencer and Hugh Fitzgerald (another founder, I believe, with surely some influence, and a frightfully clever chap from what I can see….) to review that paragraph.
Joe Murphy says
I can’t edit it seems, but I meant to say ‘another frightfully clever chap’, Robert himself being obviously a frightfully clever chap himself.
Carol the 1st says
I’d almost dozed off at the many tomes. Your good comments, Wellington, woke me up again. You did forget to mention FGM however. It would truly be intolerable to be expected to stomach such abuse of helpless children. Men seem oddly blind to this issue and normal women are too inhibited to scream bloody murder on behalf of future generations. Islam is a no go. It is not at all worthy of the consideration we are forced to give it.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
What you don’t understand is that evil Islam will not be adequately scrutinized so long as it is regarded as a religion rather than a totalitarian political ideology with some purported religious aspects – which are barbaric and irrational in any event.
Wellington says
It’s both, Terry. And why can’t a religion be scrutinized thoroughly? Christianity has been for a long time now and has survived. I predict if Islam would be it will not survive. It’s the “‘scrutiny aspect” and not the “religion aspect” that is key.
gravenimage says
Terry, I have pointed out that Westerners were critical of Islam for centuries, all while acknowledging that Islam is a religion. Your claims that no one can regard religions as anything but benignant is simply not the case.
And–as Wellington notes–Islam is both a religion *and* a totalitarian political ideology–these things are not mutually exclusive.
gravenimage says
Wellington, you are *quite right*. I should never skim articles–I had missed that. Good for you.
Much more says
Not true-
German officials sayed 10 years ago there were 4,3-4,7 MIllions Muslims(also for a looong time-seems like they get no children)that was before 2 Million came in as Refugees and as EU Citizens(many Muslim Gypsis from Bulgaria etc.).
Also in Austria the mumber of Muslims DOUBLED in 10 years!!!
na says
Who are suffering Jihad (struggle) ? we.
Sentinel says
“It must be emphasized that Islam, like any other religion, does not in itself pose a threat to the world and society.”
Disagree with this, Islam is based on the teachings of Muhammad the ‘perfect’ man to be emulated by Muslims so it is definitely a threat to the world.
patriotliz says
Agree, see my comment below.
gravenimage says
Very true.
patriotliz says
Great article until the author made the incredibly naive statement:
“It must be emphasized that Islam, like any other religion, does not in itself pose a threat to the world and society. The threat arises only when Islam ceases to be a religion and begins to be used as a political ideology that is designed to seize power in individual countries, regions or on a planetary scale by the name of creating the future World Caliphate.”
Islam IS radical, theocratic, totalitarian and political.
The Achilles heel of the West is to be so naive to grant Islam the status of a “religion”….”like any other religion.”
andra says
Your final sentence hits the point. Out of the status being called a religion, Muslims protest against everything they do not like by arguing that it is discriminating or Insult their (deeply-felt) religion.
Interesting is that in Germany e.g. the freedom of Religion has been in the constitution ever since 1948. Nonetheless Christians had to accept everything agaiinst their Religion. Before Islam came German courts Always argued that freedom of speech, press and art are a highter value than Feeling insulted. But today rules have changed – as soon as Islam is involved. If any Christian would demand the same rghts as the Muslims do they would lose at any German court.
andra says
Numerous communities of followers of Islam were formed in Germany (4 million),
———————-
The four Million is just the number the Government pretents. But it must be much more of them. Alone in Berlin are at least one Million Turks, in Northrhine-Westphalia there are up to 4 Million Turks. Altogether there are close to 10 Million from North-Africa and western Asia, most of whom are Muslims.
The number of 4 Million has been mentioned Long before the islamic Invasion that started in 2015, which brought at least 1,5 more Muslims to Germany, as hardly any Christians ore other religions migrate.
So you can believe that there are at least 8 to 9 Million Muslims in Germany with is a percentage of well 10%.
Sun says
Andra, you are absolutely right. That’s my opinion too.
Malek al Kuffar says
If, as the author claims, Muslim respect for Europeans is inversely proportional to European respect for Muslims, that means that Islamophobia is a successful strategy. Muslims respect Islamophobes more than they do Islamophiles.
Carol the 1st says
I wonder about the British daring to give their honest opinions.
Rueben_Singh says
There will be serious conflict in the years to come. Violent conflict. The people who are responsible for this more than any other are the political left. They live in a fantasy land, where moslems will integrate and contribute. They won’t it is a fantasy a dangerous one at that.
As Christopher Hitchens said words to the effect “The barbarians never breach the gates, the gates are opened from within, they will be opened in this case by the left”
Look at this FARTicle written by the odious owen jones, notice how his FARTicles concerning islam always have comments disabled.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/11/muslims-lgbtq-birmingham-sex-education-school-protests
“We should be talking about how there’s a shared level of oppression between LGBTQ people and Muslims,” said Ezra Stripe
“The dangerous conclusion to draw from this saga is that Muslims and LGBTQ people are on a collision course. That is certainly the battle cry of ever more emboldened Islamophobes, who never talk of LGBTQ rights except when it becomes convenient artillery in their bigoted war on Muslims”
“Al-Kadhi noted how many French gay men voted for the far-right National Front, a party which campaigned vociferously against equal marriage”
gravenimage says
Well, Muslims certainly oppress and murder gay people.
OLD GUY says
Mankind drove the Muslims and Islam back to the caves they crawled out of in the past. Maybe it is getting time to drive them back to their cave man status again. After all their behavior in most of their countries is brutal and inhumane to any one who is not male and a diehard follower of islam. Muhammad after all did come out of the cave with his idea of a religion that would give him control over females, and the right to declare jihad on anyone who disagrees with his view of the world.
brane pilot says
Minority rights are a huge political issue in ethnic European societies, until ethnic Europeans become a minority.
Then they learn the awful truth.
Minority rights is a strictly ethnic European concept.
Non-Europeans do not practice it, and openly ridicule it.
The history of what happens to minorities is brutal and bloody.
Humans are still the same savage animal.
A uniquely European political fad that started in the 1960s does not change that.
Michael Perloff says
🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖
This deserves further investigation
🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖