The British government has already for quite some time been at the forefront of efforts to destroy the freedom of speech and silence critics of jihad mass murder and Sharia oppression of women, gays, and others. Not only has Theresa May likened me and other foes of jihad terror to jihad terrorists themselves, she has also banned many of us from entering the country, while jihad preachers are routinely admitted and speak freely in the UK. It’s also no coincidence that many of the prominent foes of jihad terror who have been banned from social media are British: Milo, Tommy Robinson, Anne Marie Waters, Shazia Hobbs, Jonaya, and many others: the palsied hand of the Home Office is clearly at work here.
In any case, the social media giants have been working actively to become Sharia compliant of late. Twitter notifies users that their tweets violate Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. Facebook’s Vice President Joel Kaplan went to Pakistan in 2017 and assured the Pakistani government that Facebook would remove “anti-Islam” content. This British Internet Security Czar will tighten the Sharia compliance even further. Before too long, no one will dare utter a word opposing jihad mass murder or Sharia oppression; anyone who does will swiftly not have a platform to do so any larger than his or her living room. And then the jihad will be able to advance unopposed and unimpeded, which is apparently what Theresa May and her globalist cohorts want.
“UK to unleash internet safety czar on Google, Facebook, Twitter,” by Katie Collins, CNet, April 8, 2019:
Social media companies will face huge fines if they fail to live up to their “duty of care” to internet users.
The UK government is taking a hard line when it comes to online safety, moving to establish what it says is the world’s first independent regulator to keep social media companies in check.
Companies that fail to live up to requirements will face huge fines, and senior directors who are proven to have been negligent will be held personally liable. They may also find access to their sites blocked.
The new measures, designed to make the internet a safer place, were announced jointly by the Home Office and Department of Culture, Media and Sport. The introduction of the regulator is the central recommendation of a highly anticipated government white paper, titled Online Harms, published Monday in the UK.
The regulator will be tasked with ensuring social media companies tackle a range of online problems, including:
As well as applying to the major social networks, such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, the requirements will also have to be met by file-hosting sites, online forums, messaging services and search engines.
“For too long these companies have not done enough to protect users, especially children and young people, from harmful content,” UK Prime Minister Theresa May said in a statement. “We have listened to campaigners and parents, and are putting a legal duty of care on internet companies to keep people safe.”
Google and Facebook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The UK government is trying to decide whether to appoint an existing regulator to the job or to create a brand-new regulator position purely for this purpose. Initially the position will be funded by the tech industry, and the government is debating a levy for social media companies.
“The era of self-regulation for online companies is over,” Digital Secretary Jeremy Wright said in a statement. “Voluntary actions from industry to tackle online harms have not been applied consistently or gone far enough.”…