“Though her MEO complaint was reportedly found to be ‘unsubstantiated,’ Valdovinos told the publication she now intends to take legal action against the U.S. Army for infringing upon her First Amendment rights by violating her freedom of religion. However, according to a statement from Valdovinos’s brigade officer that was obtained by Yahoo!, a commander’s inquiry into her allegations was found to have ‘concluded that the senior non-commissioned officer acted appropriately by enforcing the proper wear of the hijab, in compliance with Army Regulations.'”
So an inquiry determined that her claims were unfounded, and she is suing anyway.
Armies have uniforms to avoid this sort of thing. The idea of a uniform is to signify that various individuals are submitting — voluntarily, it’s a volunteer army — to a common purpose, and putting aside their differences in the service of a greater unity. Is Cesilia Valdovinos doing that? It’s noteworthy that we have seen Muslims claiming victim status many times before, and making false claims about being mistreated or brutalized: victimhood is a big business these days, and brings the victim many perks. Is that what we are seeing here?
“Muslim soldier says she will sue Army for allegedly forcing her to remove hijab,” by Aris Folley, The Hill, April 3, 2019:
A Muslim soldier said she is preparing to sue the U.S. Army after her command sergeant major allegedly forced her to remove her hijab in front of others.
Sgt. Cesilia Valdovinos, a member the 704th Brigade Support Battalion who converted to Islam in 2016, told Yahoo! in a recent interview that her brigade commander, Col. David Zinn, granted her permission in June to wear a hijab while in uniform.
But Valdovinos told the publication that from that time forward, she experienced “extremely hateful” behavior because of her religion.
“I got called a ‘terrorist.’ I got called ‘ISIS.’ I hear comments that I’m the reason why 9/11 happened,” Valdovinos told Yahoo!. “There’s a lot of anger and animosity.”
Valdovinos said she filed a complaint with the military’s Equal Opportunity Office last month, however, after her command sergeant major allegedly pulled her out of rank and ordered her to remove her head covering in front of her colleagues.
“I felt embarrassed and religiously raped in a sense,” Valdovinos said in an email to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), a nonprofit advocacy organization that is currently representing her, according to Yahoo!.
“My religious preference is only to unveil in front of my husband in the comfort of my own home,” she continued.
With the help of MRFF, Valdovinos reportedly filed an official complaint with the Military Equal Opportunity Office (MEO) over the incident shortly thereafter.
In the complaint, Valdovinos reportedly alleges she was removed from her post as a “culinary arts specialist” because of her “religious preference to not handle pork” and claims she was referred to as “the girl with the hood” by her sergeant, among a number of other incidents, according to Yahoo.
Though her MEO complaint was reportedly found to be “unsubstantiated,” Valdovinos told the publication she now intends to take legal action against the U.S. Army for infringing upon her First Amendment rights by violating her freedom of religion.
However, according to a statement from Valdovinos’s brigade officer that was obtained by Yahoo!, a commander’s inquiry into her allegations was found to have “concluded that the senior non-commissioned officer acted appropriately by enforcing the proper wear of the hijab, in compliance with Army Regulations.”…

CogitoErgoSum says
Wouldn’t Muhammad want her hidden from sight at home or, if she must appear in public, to be accompanied by a close male relative at all times? Joining the army of the infidels is even worse.
Joseph says
Muslims should be banned from joining period. Their cult is treasonist to our country period
This is insane
While we are at it Islam should be banned in USA and world wide
Savvy Kafir says
Allowing Muslims to join the U.S. military really is nuts. We didn’t knowingly accept Nazis into our army during WWII. But common sense was a lot more common back then.
K WAGNER says
AMEN
smoris says
Absolutely right. We should under no circumstances admit Muslims into the military or law enforcement. The “code” they live by – or purportedly live by if they are truly Muslim – is inimical to our entire civilization. Arming them is beyond stupid. What is it about Nidal Hassan that the Army has forgotten? What is wrong with our military? I think we need to disband it and start from scratch. I have a friend who believes that our military will “save” us. I cannot imagine how when we are salting it with these crazies. Obviously this woman is more committed to the Koran than to the United States and its Constitution. So why is she in the military?
Madpatriot says
You are right…to start over with all that is supposed to be watching, guarding and standing for the Constitution seems to be weak and lax. We need to rid ourselves of both parties and get new ones that are true patriots and make this nation great again or we will fall so far we will never find our way again and every riff raff nobody will be here in the US thinking it will be so nice, but it won’t be!! It will be JUST like where they came from for all that made us great and wonderful place to live- will be gone!….We were made great buy our faith in God, the desire for freedom and to be a free government not ruled by a monarchy! The American Dream is gone and so is the honor, strength and determination that once was in every fiber of this country! It better find it’s way back into all we do or we are toast and if America is, so is the world!
Sequitur says
Nidal Hassan? -that was “workplace violence” (Obama).
Vietnam was war-play violence.
Islamophobia is word-play violence.
Freedom of Religion is the “cross” the rest of us have to bear.
And when Elon Musk lands on Mars there will be a muslim tapping him on the shoulder: “So where’s the site for our Great Mosque, bro?”
When you’ve finished building the Martian latrines, Mo, we’ll let you know.
Madpatriot says
There should NOT be muslims in the military or in our country for that matter…everyone KNOWS what they stand for and believe and that alone is enough to keep them barred form our nation and any part of our living. They have stated clearly they do not stand with America, do not believe as we do or believe we have the right to believe as WE do either and are here to take over NOT assimilate! As one who grew up military I am appalled that the military would set aside anything for such a person!!…Their living is not a religion as such, but is a cult of totalitarian governmental system and they have NO intent on agreeing with us on anything!! They will continue to push and push their ways as they think they will rule the world one day. ARE WE GOING TO LET SUCH RUBBISH HAPPEN?…ESPECIALLY IN OUR NATION? I WOULD THINK WE WOULD BE STRONGLY STANDING AGAINST THEM AND OTHERS LIKE THEM!! When are we all going to wake up and understand what is happening to our country and that many have lost their minds and want what is wrong and evil; socialism and every other kind of rubbish there is. Patriots and true American s that stand on the Constitution better be speaking up and loudly or we will become a third world mess.
John van Doodewaard says
It is utterly foolish to enlist Muslims into the US Army. Don’t the Army commanders have any common sense and knowledge of Islam to know that this ideology teaches to kill the Jews and Infidels meaning any non-Muslim person wherever they may be found? How do they think this is going to play out when soldiers are on the battlefield having to look over their shoulder and watch so they are not being attacked by Muslims within their ranks? Wake up people the enemy is within the gates! Muslims can never be trusted, they all believe and work towards the same goal, establish an Islamic State in North America.
Wellington says
Seconded.
liz says
Thirded
gravenimage says
+1
Patti Pickerd says
Plus millions more who are fed up with muslim 💩heads pulling their crap on America/ns!!!
windrush48 says
Especially muslims in the military in CULINARY SERVICES!!!!!
Just think how easy it would be to take entire units our of action.
I’m waiting for the muslim who hires on at “Jimmy Dean” then sues the company for “forcing” them to handle pork products.
H North says
> Don’t the Army commanders have any common sense and knowledge of Islam to know that this ideology teaches to kill the Jews and Infidels meaning any non-Muslim person wherever they may be found?
John,
Unfortunately, no: Army commanders have very little knowledge of Islamic ideology. I know, because I tried to teach them when I was in the service, and was attacked by CAIR-HAMAS for doing so. I was investigated by the Pentagon at the insistence of CAIR, only to learn that I was teaching the truth, and continued with my training courses.
Much of our military is still deceived by the old “Islam is a religion of peace” mantra, naively believing that it is benign, and that only a few “radicals” are “twisting” the religion. Sadly, there is very little common sense there.
Wanna see the REAL face of Islam? Go watch “Hotel Mumbai”.
H North
gravenimage says
Awful to hear–but I sadly cannot say I am surprised.
abad says
I come from a military family.
Soldiers do NOT give orders to their superiors, they TAKE orders from their superiors.
Second, I agree that Moslems should be banned from serving the United States military. Moslems will simply betray us, commit treason.
Third – I thought Islam strictly forbade women from serving in the military.
Stanton Lore says
Money, money, money. Somehow it’s always about benefitting from victimhood.
Paul says
“Religiously raped” Now thats a new one for me.
Whats next ? She wants to wear the full bag lady niqab whilst on duty ?
I feel offended when I see the bag ladies on the streets of London but I keep going. Thats what we do.
Paul
Frank Anderson says
I wonder how far a suit would get? I think there could be real challenges to it under Rule 11 and Litigation Accountability, not to mention bar rules which prohibit making claims that are both groundless and not subject to good faith argument for extension of existing law. I hope her lawyer has done the necessary homework. In some federal court, sanctions for Rule 11 violations are staggering.
Please consult a currently licensed attorney practicing in your jurisdiction for any legal advice.
gravenimage says
I hope this groundless case goes nowhere.
Frank Anderson says
GI, as usual we agree, with one exception-Any lawyer who files this case should suffer all the sanctions that can be applied for filing a groundless case. I have seen too many lawyers blow too much smoke in courtrooms to want more of this abuse to be allowed. When joining the military, one consents to the military rules.
Patti Pickerd says
Agree!!!!
You either follow military rules or you get the hell out!!!
Frank Anderson says
P.P. 12 years of military school (grades 1-12) made an impression. Mostly good, in my opinion. We will never know how I wo8ld have functioned in any service because I almost certainly could not pass a physical. But the whole concept of “unit” demands that each person be absolutely reliable to the other people.
“Major” Hassan is but one example of the absurdity of the inability to speak the truth about islam and its disdain for any rules but its own. How many US service people, and those they protect, will die before the truth is spoken? WHY?
gravenimage says
I agree on all points, Frank.
Frank Anderson says
GI, I think our agreeing is always most pleasant to me, and sincerely hope it is equally pleasant to you.
windrush48 says
Patti, agreed, and emphasize …… either the Constitution is held above all else, OR YOU GET THE HELL OUT.
gravenimage says
It is, Frank. 🙂
David M says
Good luck in suing the US Army you stupid Muslim, you’re going to need it.
Frank Anderson says
David, by analogy, remember what Ann Coulter said, “If Democrats had brains they would be Republicans.” Could the same idea apply here? If this were a suit in my state between private parties, the defendant would write a letter giving the plaintiff 30 days to dismiss the suit. If the suit is not dismissed, and the court finds the suit is totally without merit, the plaintiff and lawyer are on the hook for the defense costs. I believe the Litigation Accountability Act is a Uniform Law adopted by a number of states. Also under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, sanctions are possible. I have seen some reported cases where they were stunning.
John Allan says
‘… she was removed from her post as a “culinary arts specialist” because of her “religious preference to not handle pork” …’
And she was surprised?
somehistory says
John Allan
She probably complained, saying it was “unfair” and only wanted to not have to handle pork, but to lose her “special” classification was “unfair” and discriminatory to her as a moslim.
windrush48 says
She already had “special” classification by being allow to alter and publicly display the uniform of the United States Army….. talk about “religiously based favoritism”.
Ashley says
Sgt. Cesilia Valdovinos, a member the 704th Brigade Support Battalion who converted to Islam in 2016…
__________________
Settle the suit for $1.00 and get her the hell out of the US army!
gravenimage says
I don’t think she deserves even a symbolic dollar, Ashley–that would be admitting that the US Army was in the wrong.
Frank Anderson says
GI, the dollar is called “nominal damages” and could be used to award her attorney fees and expenses. See for example 42 United States Code Section 1988. Why should taxpayers pay her fees and expenses for a groundless claim? On the contrary, she and her attorneys should have to pay the government’s expenses for defense.
gravenimage says
I’m aware of this, Frank. What I meant was that I don’t believe her case merits even a nominal win.
Frank Anderson says
GI, WE CERTAINLY AGREE THAT HER CASE SHOULD NOT WIN A DIME. On the contrary, her lawyer should have to pay every dime that responding to the frivolous and groundless suit cost. Then the lawyer should be sanctioned in that court, which by “reciprocal discipline” means that a law license would be subject to discipline in every jurisdiction that issued one to that lawyer.
Generally from the research I have done on sanctions, where a client is following the advice of counsel, and sanctions are imposed for misconduct, the lawyer pays. “A lawyer’s duty of zealous advocacy of the client’s interest is limited by an equally solemn duty to uphold the law and standards of professional conduct.” Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986).
somehistory says
With female moslims…it’s always about the scarf…always. She wasn’t a moslim…she became one. She got permission to wear the headgear…”her brigade commander, Col. David Zinn, granted her permission in June to wear a hijab while in uniform.”
Then…she was told to “remove” it in front of the others. She claims that “violated her First Amendment” rights. And she was “.religiously raped”
What nonsense. First of all, she joined…no one made her. She was “granted permission”…a “permission is not a “right.” Anyone getting a driver’s license in Florida finds out that it is a “permission…a privilege” and not a “right.” A “permission” can be withdrawn.
A boy may be “permitted” by his parents to go out on Friday and Saturday nights. However, his parents may withdraw the “permission” if the need arises.
How could she be “religiously raped” by having a “permission temporarily withdrawn”?
This is just another verse in the same old song female moslims sing: They took my he job and embarrassed me and violated my rights and I want some big bucks…besides making the enemy bend to my, a moslim’s will…forcing my enemy to bow to my beast…and “be …to feel…subdued.”
A military uniform serves another purpose…to identify who is on a soldier’s side…and who is not. When Dallas plays the Redskins…or any other team…they wear different colored uniforms with different icons on the helmets. If all wore the same thing, confusion. If each player decided on what he would wear on any given Sunday, how many would decide to wear something totally different? Maybe a few…and their teammates might not know that any individually dressed player was on their team…they might tackle one of their own…they might even hit hard and “take him out.”
With her he job…she is an “enemy” on the battlefield. She has shown that she is an enemy in the barracks too. And in the Court room.
Patti Pickerd says
Too right!
CogitoErgoSum says
I wonder what kind of special treatment she gets when it comes to praying five times a day. Do they take that into consideration when making their duty assignments and schedules for her? They have already made a reassignment for her based on her aversion to pork. What steps will the Army take to keep all food out of her sight during Ramadan?
If she wants to give orders to her superiors she is in the wrong army. Of course, she does not consider infidels to be her superiors.
somehistory says
CogitoErgoSum
Doesn’t the military have schedules…like lining up in formation, certain duty times, etc,?
‘ Was she allowed to leave formation to prey? Has she been allowed to carry around a rug wherever she was at any given time? Will she be allowed to stay in the service while she sues?
moslims “cherry pick.” She leaves home without her husband, is around many men to whom she is unrelated but insists on wearing the he job. This should be pointed out if her case sees a courtroom.
Patti Pickerd says
Exactly!
gravenimage says
Good questions.
Tuffy says
Cha-ching
Ernest Risiott says
What a joke, as a Hijab has nothing to do with religion! Surely there has been enough written on this garbage subject over the last twenty years or so, that makes the answer common knowledge world wide. The Hijab as well the Burka has no standing in Islamic law! These garment are only referenced to as garments of, ‘MODESTY’ nothing else, so this paper warrior hasn’t got a leg to stand on in a court of law!
crawford421 says
Seems to me she’s still an immodest hussy — strange men can see her eyes!!!
Old Fat Bald Socially Inept Ron says
After the inconvenience caused by Major Nidal Malik Hasan in Fort Hood, it’s obvious, we never learn.
m. says
tough s**t, no muslim privilege – or any other kind
Paweł Jarmicki says
Audacity… Dishonorable discharge, I say…
Ashley says
Well, THIS is interesting:
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2019/04/03/muslim-soldier-demoted-planning-to-sue-the-army-after-hijab-controversy/
somehistory says
Ashley
Thanks for the link and additional information. She wasn’t following regulations and that is the reason she was told to remove it. How does she explain that her “hair fell to her shoulders” but she said a week later, it was “short”?
Deceit and greed. moslims are all about deceit and greed.
Ashley says
Yeah, somehistory.
I found the tidbit that she may have engaged in an “inappropriate relationship” with a fellow soldier around the same time interesting.
Notice she doesn’t comment on the allegation?
somehistory says
Ashley
She doesn’t want her moslim brothers to know or think about that. Does her husband know?
I’d also bet one of two things: cair wanted her to ask to wear the he jobby and then “sue” when problems arose….or…she brought this suit up to deflect from her “adultery” charge. moslim husbands aren’t too fond of that kind of thing from their wives, tho they seem free to engage.
gravenimage says
Yes–if someone’s hair is shoulder-length, it is certainly long enough to put up in a bun.
Ewanda says
Here we go again ……. As Robert says …., “What could go wrong?”. How about a Sharia compliant Muslima as CULINARY ARTS SPECIALIST, aka kitchen cook, having access to adulterating a whole military facility’s food …. the fact that insistence on wearing a hijab is surely a red flag to a knowledgeable military. … or should be. More court cases for CAIR to finance.
Under present day circumstances, when there is no such thing as modified Islam, (because that would be saying allah is not perfect in what is decreed), leaves no hope but only caution that we are safe from jihad. There must be certain occupations that are forbidden to Islamists in North America for safety’s sake. How about drivers, food workers, slaughterhouse employment (don’t want to keep the ability to turn off compassion and empathy alive),water reservoir maintenance, power production, military and security positions, teachers, restaurant and grocery store employment, vegetable field work, munitions factories,
oooooo – sort of sounds like Dhimmi status.
gravenimage says
I was thinking about that–how many troops could she harm working in the kitchen?
Ewanda says
All of them!! Don’t you think that the military has to do better in recognizing the threat? I thought they were supposed to be immune to political correctness for the very fact of their survival.
Patti Pickerd says
GI:Good point you raised you should voice that big concern to the army!
smoris says
I think if she continues in the military and there are events which harm our troops as a result – harm them in any way – then her superiors all the way up the line to the top should be held directly and personally responsible and should be required to tender their resignations immediately. So if she poisons the troops or if she mis-types orders or misfiles them or if she physically attacks a fellow soldier or innocent American civilian, her superiors need to be on the carpet big time for it. They have been notified this is a nut and at least thinks she is a Muslim and we can expect her to act out. If she is not booted out with a dishonorable discharge then it is her commanding officer who is to blame. Take ’em all down.
Frank Anderson says
S., look at what happened to the dozens of doctors and other officers who ignored every warning given by Nidal Hassan before the Fort Hood shooting. NOTHING!. This was not even treated as a terrorist attack, but instead soft-pedaled as “workplace violence”. NOBODY lost a day of pay or a step of rank for their active participation in making these murders possible. Has anything been learned since? Until islam is recognized for the criminal conspiracy that it is and has been for 1400 years, we are in the same position as if Nazi soldiers mixed with our forces before and during WWII.
gravenimage says
+1
antonia says
Wearing the Islamic veil is like wearing the insignia of an imperial, supremacist army … it should not be allowed, since it is the insignia of another army at war with the US constitution.
K. 33.59 says women wear it TO BE IDENTIFIED and NOT MOLESTED.
This is a command to wear the veil so that MUSLIM TROOPS will not RAPE Muslims, mistaking them for rapable kafir women.
gravenimage says
Exactly–this is telling fellow Muslims to rape someone else.
FYI says
The hijab is worn in honor of allah,right?
The muslim pagan god of the Arabs..
allah “the BEST of deceivers” k3:54
allah Khayrul makhereen…
A god who says women are deficient in intelligence{Sahih Bukhari 3:48:826}
A god whose polygamous “prophet” muhammed with his 9 year old “wife” Aisha,said the reason the testimony of a woman is HALF that of a man is because “Of the deficiency of a woman’s mind”{Sahih Bukhari 2658}
A god who says most of those who go to hell are women {Sahih Muslim 241}
Speaking of being “Religiously RAPED in a sense”..
allah PERMITS the RAPE of women{Abu Dawud vol 2 hadith 2155} and their use as sex-slaves k4:24 even if they are married women{“what the right hand possesses”:isn’t that..Adultery?And allah is OK with it!}
How evil is this pagan muslim god allah:what sort of god says it is OK to rape women?
“Aisha said to muhammed:”You have made us equal to dogs and asses”{Sahih Muslim 4:1039}
allah the misogynist:that’s some god alright……a god and his “prophet” who are OK with Rape…
Remember that muslimas when you put on your hijabs and “pray” to your deceiver god…
allah is OK with Rape.
Michael Rembrandt says
I’d really like to know why she was attracted to Islam. Was it the misogyny or the hatred of infidels? Or, was it the stoning of gays and adulterers?
Ashley says
Can’t tell you, friend. Only read that she converted in March, 2016.
If I would to venture a guess…she saw an opportunity to screw and fleece the government. “My new religion dictates I can’t work with pork. My new religion dictates I wear the hijab. My new religion dictates that I play the victim card at each and every corner.”
Do we REALLY know Valdovinos converted? She hasn’t adopted an Islamic name. She doesn’t speak of Allah or the Qur’an.
But she’s been reprimanded and demoted by the army for allegedly engaging in an “appropriate relationship” with a fellow soldier while married.
An allegation she has yet to fuss about…
gravenimage says
I also noted that she was not using a Muslim name. I heard once that save for women marrying and adopting their husband’s names, that recruits are not encouraged to change their names. Any vets here who would know?
Wellington says
Devout Muslims don’t (can’t) assimilate to non-Muslim cultures. Muslims who think they can assimilate into non-Muslim cultures are deeply confused about what their own religion asserts.
Conclusion: No Muslim in a non-Muslim society is worth trusting either because they are devout and informed about Islam or because they are not devout and informed about Islam. It’s a lose/lose situation.
gravenimage says
a commander’s inquiry into her allegations was found to have ‘concluded that the senior non-commissioned officer acted appropriately by enforcing the proper wear of the hijab, in compliance with Army Regulations.’”
…………………………..
So now not even this bowing to Muslim demands is enough?
More:
In the complaint, Valdovinos reportedly alleges she was removed from her post as a “culinary arts specialist” because of her “religious preference to not handle pork”. I
…………………………..
Well, this is ridiculous. I’m a vegetarian, but if I enlisted in the military as a “culinary arts specialist” I would expect to have to handle all aspects of meal prep, and would know that this would include pork and other kinds of meat.
It looks as though she may have enlisted looking to wage “Lawfare” to begin with.
Jay says
She is the enemy within and should be removed from her post immediately and discharged! Remember the Muslim doctor who killed so many on the army base a few years ago. Guns were banned on that particular base too. She is not suited to be in our military and represents everything not compatible with our military code or our constitution. It’s like reps Tlaib and Omar using a Koran to be sworn in on. Complete insanity!
Wake up America! Get this traitor out of our military before it’s too late!
God bless our armed forces!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸
Trump 2020. Our only hope !! 🇺🇸🇺🇸
Jay says
Get traitors Tlaib, Omar and Ocasio out of the House of Rep too!!
Three more traitors within!!
Sam says
How did we come to this point? A cult member, muslima, who has the ideology totally against the Constitution in the army suing the army for being against the Constitution by not allowing her to show her alliance to the cult which is totally against American values.
Sick!
Frank Anderson says
Sam, sooner or later in some court the truth about islam will be presented. I believe Abraham Lincoln is given credit for the quote, “You can fool all of the people some of the time; and some of the people all of the time; but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” If I am in error in crediting the quote please correct me. As to being fooled, GWB fooled me from 9/11/01 for about 7 years with the “religion of peace” lie.
If I were presenting a case where the issue of establishing that islam is a criminal conspiracy and not a “Constitutionally Protected Religion” I would include as my expert witnesses our host, Robert Spencer, Bill Warner, Mark Gabriel, Wafa Sultan, Bridgette Gabriel, and as many other people as I could attract, along with their publications. I don’t see a judge allowing this case to get to trial. If it does, I doubt the defense will be allowed to address the issue head-on. That is where a third party intervention could force the issue to be heard and preserve it for appeal. If an issue is not heard at trial it almost certainly cannot be raised on appeal. A single ruling that islam is a criminal conspiracy would collapse the house of cards if upheld on appeal. Then actions to defend us, our lives, liberty, and future would no longer be questionable under the law. Is there a better or more beneficial result possible for a decade or more of litigation?
Please consult a currently licensed attorney practicing in your jurisdiction for any legal advice.
Barb says
The Muslim soldier has not had her religious rites violated – Islam is acknowledged as a Political Ideology & CNN recently admitted that Islam is a Legal System!
Frank Anderson says
Barb, islam has described itself for 1400 years. It has kept no secret about its teaching and goals. Please help me understand how CNN’s usual lying and deception is helpful? Like most media today telling any truth is an accident, with every effort made to avoid it, or drown it with more lies.
gravenimage says
I think the more sources that admit even part of the truth about Islam the better.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Of course she was scared to remove it!
The Qur’an itself order her to wear it, lest MUSLIMS molest her!
Aussie Infidel says
This situation will continue as long as Islam is deemed lawful and Muslims are free to practise their religion openly, and participate in civil society. People like Valdovinos deliberately provoke the system to gain privileges for Islam and pave the way for Sharia. Having a member of the enemy camp serving in one’s army is a recipe for disaster. If defense officials and the judiciary can’t see that, they have brains in their arses.
No progress will be made on this issue until lawmakers start to fight fire with fire. Islam will continue to remain a thorn in our side until it is declared a threat to the national security of the US. Only then will challenging it have any chance of success, and we can begin to turn back the tide.
The Muslims realised long ago that simply having a religion whose tenets commanded violence against kafirs, would not be enough to ensure its long term survival. So they came up with the Sharia or sacred Islamic law. When religious tenets are elevated to the status of law, and punishments are specified for disobedience, people have to comply or suffer the consequences.
old Sweden says
Were are her loyalty?
The answer is clear!
Not with The United States!
Jan Disher says
No muslim should be allowed to enlist in the forces, or be a police officer, firefighter or be in any position of power!!
Dr. Doom says
Really? A Muslim woman in the U.S. Army? WTH? That seems to me to conflict with one of the primary missions of the Army and that is to fight Islamic terrorists. So how is anyone of her peers to know what really believes in terms of fighting extremist Muslim groups? And, since she wears the hijab, does she accept Sharia?
Old Guy says
She took an oath to follow orders, I believe an order to remove your head cover would be a legal order from a superior. If you can not follow orders you do not belong in the military
Frank Anderson says
Old Guy, as long as it is a lawful order it must be followed. (Nuremburg Rule-UN Charter-War Crimes trials-Article 6 Clause 2 US Constitution).
Would you want someone who believes that all human orders contrary to the “laws” of islam are without value next to you in combat with a weapon? Look what happened at Fort Hood when everyone except the muslim was unarmed!. How many “friendly fire” episodes will it take to understand that kafirs, infidels, sub-humans are not at all appreciated. There is no moderate islam. Some are just more patient than others to achieve the goals. The best muslims are former muslims who really want to get out of that evil.
J D.S says
Muslims are confident only to islam……Why did she join the army in the first place? There are restrictions
and obligations in the military that islamic laws but up against….Muslims shouldn’t be in the military or anywhere that they are required to swear allegiance to the country and constitution…..They just can’t do that because Islamic laws overrides it…..Sue the Army…Now how stupid Is that?
gategustafson says
When push comes to shove, I have no doubt whatsoever which side the muslims in the American army will pledge allegiance to.
infidel says
Ah just another day at the Islamic office… making easy money from the khafir… SAY NO TO HARD WORK…the Islamic way!! But it would also make sense to get rid of this Troj pest from the army
alex reid says
The naivety of people who are supposed to be intelligent astounds me!! Mozzies shouldn’t be in Western Armed Forces. They absolutely detest non-Mozzies. We’re regarded as simply prey. There’s even Medical personnel in the US saying they want to hurt their ‘infidel’ patients. The lunatics are being allowed to take over the countries. This is simply going to get worse & future generations of Westerners are going to spit on our graves for letting this sh*t happen!
Larry says
She should’ve been two choices wear the rag properly or GET OUT!!!!!!!!!!!
gravenimage says
Really, there should be no proper wearing of the Islamic slave rag in Infidel military.
Battle says
Military Religious Freedom Foundation is on the wrong case.
Sgt Secilia Valdovinos is a jihadi civilation-hater.
Sequitur says
Join The Army And Sue The World