A disturbing story about the travails of a British GP here:
“A GP has revealed he is planning to quit medicine over an investigation by the doctors watchdog into claims he ‘discriminated’ against a Muslim woman for asking her to remove her veil.
“Dr Keith Wolverson said he ‘politely’ asked the woman to take off the garment for patient safety reasons during a consultation last year because he was unable to hear her explain her sick daughter’s symptoms.
“He was then ‘deeply upset’ when last week he received a letter from the General Medical Council, the professional regulator, informing him that he was subject to an inquiry over allegations of racial discrimination which could result in him being struck off.
“Last night, Dr Wolverson, who has practised as a GP for 23 years and has an unblemished record, said regardless of the outcome of the investigation he now plans to leave his job.
“He said: ‘I feel a major injustice has taken place. This is why you are waiting so long to see your GP and doctors are leaving in droves. This country will have no doctors left if we continue to treat them in this manner. I’m deeply upset.
‘A doctor’s quest to perform the very finest consultation for the safety of the patient has been misinterpreted in a duplicitous manner to suggest there has been an act of racism committed. I absolutely no longer want to be a doctor.’
“Dr Wolverson told how the Muslim woman brought her daughter, aged ten or 11, to see him at a walk-in centre at Royal Stoke University Hospital in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, last June.
“The doctor said he asked the woman to remove the veil as he was unable to hear her explain her sick daughter’s symptoms because of the niqab she was wearing
“The mother said she was concerned the child had tonsillitis.
‘But the 52-year-old GP struggled to hear the mother’s account of the girl’s health problems because her speech was being obscured by her niqab – a garment worn by some Muslim women that covers the body and face apart from the eyes.
“The doctor said he ‘politely’ asked the woman to remove the veil covering her face so he could be sure what she was saying.
“I asked her, would you kindly remove your face veil please because it makes communication very difficult,’ Dr Wolverson explained. ‘Normally this issue doesn’t arise because patients automatically do so.
‘“One would think that any parent would be wholly supportive and grateful that a doctor was trying to safely treat their child.”
“According to Dr Wolverson, the mother complied with his request without raising any objections.
“But half an hour after the consultation, her husband arrived and declared he was making a complaint about the GP’s behaviour.
‘He sat outside my consultation room and threateningly made eye contact towards me whenever I went out to fetch each patient,’ Dr Wolverson said. ‘He then made a formal complaint and I was prevented from working at the walk-in centre again.’
“It has since emerged that NHS bosses sent the GMC a form outlining the complaints. It says the woman told the doctor she did not want to remove the veil on religious grounds but he refused to continue the consultation unless she did.
Should we not believe Dr. Wolverton, when he said the child’s mother “complied with his request without raising any objection”? There are two possible reasons for her to have changed her story. It might be that she herself changed it to a tale of forced removal, so as to avoid being punished by her husband for having voluntarily removed the covering over her face. Or another obvious possibility: the husband, enraged at the doctor’s request to his wife, decided to have her change her story, and to now claim that the doctor had threatened to end the consultation unless she removed her face veil. And then the husband could make those wild charges of “racism” and “discrimination,” and malevolently get the doctor in deep trouble for trying tonly o do the best job he could.
“Dr. Wolverson is now facing an inquiry but he said that, regardless of its outcome, he does not want to work as a GP anymore.
“It claims he was ‘rude’ and ‘gave her a dirty look’, leaving her shocked and crying. She said she felt ‘victimised and racially discriminated’ against.
His “unblemished record,” including the fact that he had treated, without any complaints, many Muslim patients (which is why he could claim that “normally this issue doesn’t arise because [niqab-wearing] patients [when asked to uncover] automatically do so”), make Dr. Wolverson’s version fair more credible than that given by the husband. Who in his right mind does not see the husband’s version as a made-up story, with that supposed “dirty look” of the doctor that left the wife “shocked and crying”? Why did no one else at the doctor’s office apparently see her shocked state, or hear her crying?? And as for that all-purpose Muslim complaint of feeling “victimized and racially discriminated against,” such claims of victimhood by Muslims are standard fare and must be taken with a grain of salt. She “felt victimized” does not mean that she was “victimized.’; There is a real victim here — the doctor himself – who has been so disturbed by the unfair charges made against him and the GMC investigation, that he vows even if he is absolved, he has decided to give up his practice altogether. That’s a real, rather than factitious victim.
The mother was not the “victim” of anything but the doctor’s praiseworthy attention.. A careful GP taking a history, he wanted to hear –very clearly — her description of her daughter’s symptoms, and for that she needed to remove the face veil. As fo the mother’s charge of being “racially discriminated” against, for the millionth time we all must insist that Islam is a faith, not a race, that any anti-Muslim attitudes or behavior are not expressions of “racism,” no matter how many times Muslims and their apologists maintain otherwise. In any case, there is nothing to suggest that Dr. Wolverson has ever been anti-Muslim in any way; his only interest was in hearing what the mother was saying.
“Joyce Robins, from Patient Concern, said losing a doctor over the issue would be ‘criminal’. ‘A doctor needs to be sensitive to a patient’s religion but safety must always come first,’ she added.
“A spokesman for The Doctors’ Association UK said: ‘It is of utmost importance that the religious wishes of our patients are respected. However, evidently there are some circumstances where removal of a nib or burka is necessary for medical assessment and treatment.
‘The GMC should consider issuing clear guidelines to protect both doctors and our patients.’
“Human rights campaigner Aisha Ali-Khan tweeted: ‘I don’t believe [a] doctor should be prosecuted for doing his job *but* he should have asked for a female third party to help, or asked the patient to write down her medical complaints.’
How would a “female third party” have helped in this situation? Would she act as a kind of chaperone? What exactly would be her role? The mother had been asked by the GP only to uncover her mouth, so that she could be heard more clearly. Is it likely that this woman, for whom English was a second language, would be able put in writing her observations of her daughter’s illness? Isn’t it more likely that she was unable to write in English? And even if she could read and write in English, in a situation where the doctor has a series of questions to ask about the patient’s condition, think of how complicated and laborious it would be for the doctor to have to first write out a question, wait for the mother to read it, then write out her answer, and then, based on that answer, the doctor would write out another question, then wait for her to write out her answer, and so on. Doctors have a right to question patients (and in the case of children, their parents) as best and as efficiently they can, which here means taking a history orally from the patient’s mother.
How can it be “discrimination” for a GP to try to give the child patient the best possible care by ensuring he has heard from her mother, in a clear voice, about the child’s symptoms? How is it “discrimination” to ask the mother to remove her face veil in order to be able to hear her otherwise niqab-muffled voice? Dr. Wolverson has testified that when his other niqabbed patients were asked to remove the veil, they all complied without incident.
Here is a GP, being investigated because of complaints by a Muslim couple who claim that the wife has been “discriminated” against and has been the victim of “racism” for having been asked to remove her face veil. Apparently they want the GMC to ignore the doctor’s explanation that he had politely requested the mother to remove the face veil so that he could better hear her describe her daughter’s symptoms, and that she had promptly done so. All the rest of the Muslim couple’s tale — the wife being left “shocked and crying” at Dr. Wolverson’s request, the “discrimination” and “racism” she supposedly felt is the kind of whipped-up hysteria and victimhood that Muslims so often engage in. There is no evidence for the wife’s supposedly shocked mental state, or her anguish at supposed “discrimination” and “racism.” No one at the doctors’s office noticed anything untoward.. We have only the wife’s own testimony, which was likely scripted for her by her husband; against this we have the testimony of a doctor who has been practicing, for 23 years, with an “unblemished record”– not a single complaint against him until now– of serving Muslim and non-Muslim patients alike.
It would be nice to think that not only will these wild charges made against Dr. Wolverson, both baseless and cruel, soon be dismissed, but that the parents will be condemned by the GMC for attempting, with these false charges, to harm the reputation of a blameless doctor for doing nothing more than trying to clearly understand a patient’s condition.
The doctor has been greatly disturbed by these grotesque charges, and being made subject to the humiliation of an investigation by the General Medical Council. How many others, not only physicians, but teachers, policemen, lawyers, salesmen have been, or will be, vilified, like Dr Wolversson, by Muslims quick to charge others with non-existent ‘‘discrimination” and “racism”? Dr. Wolverson has announced that he will be leaving his practice altogether. Great Britain already has a shortage of GPs. Is this the result the authorities want?
Rev. G says
Make the clinic a burka and niqab free zone. Problem solved. “For the safety of all staff and patients, no masks obscuring the face shall be worn on this premises, to include ski masks, burkas, and Niqabs. The only exception is for white surgical style masks used by staff, or by patients with compromised immune systems.”
Victoria says
Britain is a lost cause and the EU isn’t far behind. I had hope for BREXIT but even that is fading. There is a shadow of doom wrapping itself around the globe and I fear years of darkness before the light shines again.
Rufolino says
Yes.
Everyone should know by now that all the authorities in the UK are very likely to side with Moslem interests against their own people.
A time bomb has been set up in the UK, it is already ticking, but how many months or years remain on the clock cannot be known exactly.
gravenimage says
May and other British authorities seem to be stymying Brexit at every point.
Giacomo Latta says
Trump took the US out of NAFTA without demanding anyone’s permission. What is Britain’s problem?
A_M_Swallow says
Britain’s problem with leaving the EU is the EU has told Mrs May to find a way to keep Britain in. Her current effort has kept the UK in for several months.
To get Britain out of the EU Mrs May will have to be fired. Her ‘resignation’ has already been submitted. MPs are now applying for the job of Prime Minister.
gravenimage says
May never supported Brexit.
dwight hogg says
I believe that eventually there will be a major violent retaliation against all Muslims in Britain. I recently saw on the news a mob of Muslims raging through the streets, their faces contorted in blind hatred, bedbug held back by the police until special forces arrived. Some of the police were attacked by the Muslim mob. Probably no arrests made. This can only go on for so long before the total breakdown of society occurs.
IanB says
Where and when did that happen?
gravenimage says
Of course, civilized Infidels don’t act like this.
gravenimage says
A British GP Hounded Out Of Medicine By Muslim Claims
……………………….
Grotesque injustice against Dr Keith Wolverson, who was just trying to give a Muslim child the best care possible.
Sun says
Obviously, the child did not need to see a specialist, Dr. Wolverson is general practitioner.
I’m wondering why this lady did not visit a Muslim doctor…
gravenimage says
She went to the public hospital–she is not paying for a private physician. In fact, she is probably on the dole.
James Lincoln says
I found an interesting reference in the UK The Sun news site:
“The GMC says medics who wear a veil must remove it if a patient finds it an “obstacle” to communication. They give no guidance on how GPs should react in the reverse situation.:”
Point in fact, communication is a two-way interaction.
The chances are, if the doctor had NOT asked the Muslim woman to at least partially remove her niquab in order to enable clear communication, a complaint would likely have been filed for this as well.
I think that the take-home is this: if a doctor is treating a Muslim patient, a same-sex standby should always be employed to document the encounter and protect the physician against malicious and nuisance complaints.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9107808/family-gp-quit-medicine-axed-muslim-mum-remove-veil-appointment/
Jake says
Don’t worry. The NHS will import some doctor from the third world who not only won’t ask a mom to remove her face covering, he won’t ask any questions at all. In fact, unless you pay him under the table, he might not even see you. And if he does, he will ignore you completely if you are a woman. That’s even better. You will get the same fine care you would get in Yemen. But no worries, no veil will not be removed.
gravenimage says
Grimly likely…
FYI says
Probably some third rate medical student catastrophe from Abdoolistan:the sort we’ll most likely be hearing about in gross negligence and malpractice cases ..
CRUSADER says
Fine solution, Jake.
No worries, now, mates.
ObamaCare should’ve been set up like this….
Phil Copson says
“….The NHS will import some doctor from the third world…”
————————————————————————-
And maybe this is what the mind-set now is – who exactly is the General Medical Council these days anyway ? A bunch of people who instinctively want to see white doctors replaced ?
Why should we trust the GMC, when we plainly can’t trust our police forces*, the Crown Prosecution Service, the judiciary, our news media, or our politicians ?
* The sight of Manchester Police Force apparently complicit in the violent attacks on Tommy Robinson’s supporters was sickening, and the slanted coverage of it by the media was not “reporting”, but deceit and manipulation designed to serve their own agenda.
Agha Ali Arkhan says
Funny(?) how the Nazis slipped into the UK, isn’t it.
CRUSADER says
brown jellaba and keffiyeh added to their brown shirts!!!
A_M_Swallow says
I think the whole family should be removed from the medical lists in that town. All the other doctors need to protect themselves.
Social Services should investigate to see if the children are being abused.
Benedict says
– “dirty look” of the doctor –
That explains it all! Apparently Dr Wolfersson was a bit of a wolf in a doctors clothing and therefor tried unashamedly to have sex with the Muslim mother of his Muslim patient in his reception room. I can’t count how many times this has happened to #MeToo, and I’m glad that someone finally brought it up.
gravenimage says
Is this calumny against the doctor, or a ham-fisted attempt at “humor”?
R Cole says
France has a lot of trouble with over protective Muslim men, objecting to their women seeing a male doctor even as they are having a baby. There was one case where the Muslim man, took his wife to the emergency room because she was having a baby. But there were only male doctors on staff. So the guy – as the all knowing male in Islam – decides to take his wife home.
What happens next, is the women gets out to the parking lot and starts to have the baby on the ground!! Of course a crowd gathers round, and the nurses come running out to help. And one of them told the Muslim couple, you didn’t want her to have the baby with the help of the male doctors inside the hospital, but she is now having the baby outside in front of everybody.
Incidents like these, led the French to put up signs in the emergency wards, saying, whoever is there on staff that’s who you will see. They had problems with the men getting aggressive and trying to attack the male doctors, for ~ god forbid, they looked at their wives.
The UK case sound like the daughter needed urgent care, and the husband is more concerned that the doctor saw, the lower half of his wife’s face.
They will throw a good doctor, out for this scam. [Compare this to the Rotherham grooming gang case. The disparity is a joke!!]
This doctor could go and work in the USA, lot less stress lot more money.
PRCS says
First thing that came to mind:
Many other nations for him find employment.
Lauren Hermann says
R Cole,
“They had problems with the men getting aggressive and trying to attack the male doctors, for ~ god forbid, they looked at their wives.” You’re joking, right? These women are the most butt-ugly women I have ever seen. Just expressing my personal opinion. Now see if this comment gets posted.
Brian hoff says
I was rideing the bus one time I was relax when the bus driver have to jam on the brake as than car cut in front of in and slow down. I land on than muslim woman lap. There where two muslim woman and two muslim man one got very upset the other one told him to calm down and ignore it.
Brian hoff says
Only my head face down land in her lap..
gravenimage says
“DefenderofIslam” here is lucky this happened in the West, or his coreligionists would have had to “Honor Kill” him.
FYI says
an art gallery exhibition?
the muslims complain;wah wah wah..
Ok let’s close the exhibition.
peppa the pig cartoons on the TV?
the muslims complain:wah wah wah..
Ok let’s not offend the Holy Yusufs.
Not enough mosques being built?
the muslims complain:wah wah wah
Ok let’s be more “inclusive” and “culturally enriching”and let them build more.
When is all the pandering to this misogynistic,antisemitic,antichristian,antisocial,antidemocratic,murderous,terrorist evil cult going to stop?
“All religions are equal but islam is much more equal than other beliefs”
Bad Penguin says
This is what the Brit politicians want and now Britain is falling. No tears from me.
Bronson says
Another case of lawfare used against the kafir where the process is the punishment.
screw u says
There is a third possible reason for the complaint! The husband bitches loud enough and screams for compensation $$$$$$$.
Seen it happen before.
A_M_Swallow says
In which case the Muslim man is doing it the wrong way. You do not go to the General Medical council for compensation. You sue in the courts. Although a lawyer may have refused to take the case.
screw u says
Could simply be the first step to build up enough victimhood! Then when nothing happens scream discrimination and outrage.
seen this tactic used by others and unfortunately it seems to work.
Terry Gain says
Is well past the point where I. feel sorry for the British people.
mortimer says
Doctors must now have a LAWYER PRESENT whenever a Muslim patient is present. The lawyer’s bill must be presented to the Muslim patient or added into it. UK doctors will now have to pay ADDITIONAL “MUSLIM-BASED” LAWSUIT INSURANCE to pay the costly legal bills that will be required. Doctors will have to have CAMERAS AND AUDIO-RECORDERS running when any MUSLIM patient is in the consulting room. Male doctors would now be INSANE to interview a MUSLIM WOMAN PATIENT without 3 or 4 witnesses present and then a DEPOSITION must be signed AFTER THE CONSULTATION by ALL FOUR witnesses.
Since most of the above is impractical, UK doctors will have to find ways to AVOID MUSLIM WOMEN PATIENTS ENTIRELY in future.
MUSLIMS HATE KAFIRS ‘for the sake of Allah’ … the teaching is called AL WALAA WAL BARAA … look in up, please, dear people. INFORM YOURSELVES and be FOREWARNED that Muslims are REQUIRED to hate you … this is NOT optional.
This spiteful, malicious woman is merely after her share of the BOOTY and the JIZZYA TAX promised to pious Muslims in the Koran.
Rufolino says
Thanks for the resounding clarity, Mortimer. Well put.
Moslems are required to hate us.
Carolyne says
For many years I have visited the UK at least annually and often several times a year. I loved the history, (which after all was our history) the landmarks, Stonehenge, all of it. I even liked the food. But for several years I have not gone to England precisely because it has become a third world country, a Baghdad on the Thames. The last time I was there I had pneumonia and had a doctor visit me at my hotel. He was some kind of Muslim person and he gave me an antibiotic we haven’t used for pneumonia for years. He charged me $500. It seems that along with their culture their medicine has fallen to third world standards.
I think all of that ridiculous garb should be outlawed and if these “people” don’t like it they should be forcibly returned to their hellhole of origin.
John Allan says
‘… it has become a third world country, a Baghdad on the Thames.’
The Thames is one river. How the hell does it represent the whole country.
Paul J says
Baghdad is one city. An infection starts at one point of entry and then spreads, as islam has in the UK.
Carolyne says
I should have realized one dense person wouldn’t understand my point. Kebab, anyone?
gravenimage says
Carolyne, I knew that your reference was not just to London.
Steve says
I have a question for Englanstan. Since when is Islam or Muslim a race?
Agha Ali Arkhan says
In case the law figures it out that it is not a race, islamophobia was invented.
Halal Bacon says
rookie mistake, he should have request a translator
sidney penny says
Why would anyone want to deal with a person who covers her face is beyond me.
As a public servant in a hospital you are forced to I suppose
Only solution to the cries of Islamophobia is to say no patients or persons accompanied the will be attended to unless their face can be seen. But we are dealing with dimmi Britain.
She should gone to go female Muslim doctor
thebigW says
might as well be treating Tony Soprano’s wife with a gun to your head — and with the government backing Tony up
John Allan says
Tell her and her husband to eff off home if they don’t like the UK. No doubt the pri_k will soon change his tune.
Heidi says
They are always the victims, aren’t they? Their magic word is “discrimination” and everybody will run to satisfy their demands. Lets hope the EU Parliament will look different after the elections on 26 May. But I doubt it very much because a lot of the Europeans are absolutely braindead.
Reziac says
This problem is easily solved: between patients, wash your hands in pig’s blood.
Jayell says
Standard supremacist behaviour from the muslim husband. The woman obviously told him that she couldn’t make herself understood with that ridiculous garb on, his bloated islamic ego was compromised, and the only way he could assert his supremacy was by playing the victim. And we have a serious shortage of GPs in the UK. It’s not the first time these muslims have deliberately connived to wreck the place – which we all know is their intention.
Meturaf says
I dont know if this JW allows this but I will try.
https://www.change.org/p/general-medical-council-stop-dr-wolverson-getting-fired?signed=true
Hugh Fitzgerald says
This account claims that Dr. Wolverson ended the consultation when the woman refused to remove her face veil.But in all other accounts he says that she did remove the veil and the consultation continued without incident.
gravenimage says
Glad to see this petition, even if it does get this point wrong.
Terra Nova says
Look at the picture of the women. They are showed as the ultimate victims, When they walk into a doctors office or a hospital, they should forbid the entry until they move their headdresses and veils. Idiotcrasy is reaching his top. They should be kicked out of all European countries and the people who loved them so much, with them. Citizens of the Western countries should be ashamed deeply. Your children and grandchildren have to fight it out because of your and your governments cowardice. They will get it and it will not be pretty !!!
Or Else! says
Human Rights Commissions/Boards/Tribunals/Panels etc. are nothing more than angry, resentful leftists looking to virtue-signal their way out of the guilt they’ve been told they MUST bear…..as they build their socialist utopia against the “evil, white, Western patriarchy.” These groups NEED “victims” in order to exist, and Islam is more than happy to fill that “quota”.
Guess what, lefties. Islam is the ULTIMATE patriarchic ideology. It has no room for inclusion, diversity, freedoms/rights for all….unless one converts, that is. And even then, it’s best to be a straight male AND the “right kind of Muslim”.
Stop hitting SNOOZE…
J D.S says
This Dr. Has practiced medicine for over 20 years without instances that would cause a board to question but this one woman has caused the loss of a medical professional to a country that needs more professionals to just handle the influx of muslims and I wonder how many Doctors give free services to these people who are trampling on the very essence of humanity….So sorry to see a once great nation that at one time covered a vast area …. Probably The European nations that once governed should never have given these countries their right to rule…just look what they have done with their governing themselves.
Linda Goudsmit says
Any Muslim patient who does not want to remove her veil should be treated exclusively by Muslim doctors. Britain is becoming a dhimmi nation and soon the useful idiots who facilitate its demise will be hounded out of office by the same submission to Islam that hounded Dr Wolverson out of medicine. There is no multiculturalism in Islam – there is only Islam. Soon Britain will be a Muslim nation.
Tom says
First point for consideration by any tribunal looking into the complain should be that Muslim is NOT a race and therefore the complaint should not be validated on the complaint of racial discrimination.
Second point should be that attempted intimidation of the MD conducting his work by the husband should be a consideration of the tribunal.
Third point should be that the MD made a point of continuing with his diagnosis of the child and, presumably, would have treated the child’s condition and prescribed medication if needed. Proving his professionalism and lack of “racial discrimination” toward someone of another culture as a patient.
As some Muslims have previously been proven to lie to achieve their status as victim, this must be taken into consideration as a factor.
The British National Health medical system is falling apart, according to many that I communicate with in the UK, and abuse of those working within it is rampant. No one can blame Nurses and MD’s for leaving a system where they are less and less appreciated by those who have a supremacist attitude and who use the victim card to bully and intimidate.
Carolyne says
Two comments about British medicine, both having been reported in London newspapers.
(Try to keep up John Allan.). The first is that the NHS couldn’t separate the wards by sex. It proved too difficult. Yes, apparently they have wards. I didn’t understand why they couldn’t just say on a particular day, “Okay, women over here, men over here.”
The other article said that people were pulling their own teeth because it took six months to get an appointment with a dentist.
A_M_Swallow says
Tell them if an adult wants to see a dentist they have to pay.
Elizabeth Thorne says
2019 and women are walking around dressed like oppressed slaves. Send them back to the hellhole they came from. Enough nonsense. Countries need to start a campaign: OUR WAY, OR THE HIGHWAY
Anjuli Pandavar says
“A spokesman for The Doctors’ Association UK said: ‘It is of utmost importance that the religious wishes of our patients are respected. However, evidently there are some circumstances where removal of a nib or burka is necessary for medical assessment and treatment.
—
What pandering crap. Why is it “of the utmost importance”? He is a *doctor*, not a cleric. Of the utmost importance is to save lives and relief suffering. “Evidently there are circumstances…” It is SELF-evident. No apology required!
‘The GMC should consider issuing clear guidelines to protect both doctors and our patients.’
—
What, exactly, did the patient need protection from? Was this a Muslim doctor minded to give the wrong medicine to a Jewish patient?
“Human rights campaigner Aisha Ali-Khan tweeted: ‘I don’t believe [a] doctor should be prosecuted for doing his job *but* he should have asked for a female third party to help, or asked the patient to write down her medical complaints.’
—
More BS. Would that “female third party” also complain about having to remove her niqab? Oh, it would be a female *without* a niqab. So what was wrong with the female second party being without the niqab? “Ask the patient to write down her medical complaints”? This bs is not even thought out. it comes straight off the top of her head. A Muslim can *never* be faulted by an infidel, and if anyone is to be put to inconvenience, trouble or cost, it must *always* be the infidel, *never* the Muslim. My God. have you not had enough of Muslims yet?
I would like to see those who claim to “have no problem with Muslims as people” respond to Aisha Ali-Khan’s wisdom. Yes, of course Islam is the problem, but it is blindingly obvious that muslims are, too. Just because bigots run with such a statement *doesn’t make it false*. Muslims, *as people*, are a problem. There. They’ve just removed a doctor from our society, just like that. That doctor is now no longer available to *anyone*. Are Muslims going to compensate our society for the cost of training a new doctor? Of course not! Are Muslims going to compensate patients who will now have to wait longer or travel further? Of course not! Are Muslims going to compensate the doctor’s family for loss of income? Of course not! WE, non-Muslims, will incur all of these costs. As Anjem Choudary boasts, non-Muslims always pay for Muslims — that’s how it should be. You didn’t read the small print when you welcomed them with open arms, did you?
Anjuli Pandavar says
Oh, and while we’re at it, “*Human rights campaigner* Aisha Ali-Khan.” Let’s be honest here. She is a MUSLIM PRIVILEGE CAMPAIGNER. Are Muslims interested in human rights? Yes, they are — very much so. The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (now the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation), OIC, comprised of 56 Muslim states plus “the Palestinians”, exists explicitly to destroy the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Why? Because it stands in the way of Shari’a, and as we all know, nothing trumps the barbaric Shari’a. Anyone minded to give this “human rights campaigner” the time of day should consider the medical track record of ISIS. That is what you will get should the so-called Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam ever see the light of day. Muslim *human rights campaigners* are working very hard to get the world to accept the permanent subjugation of women, the permanent supremacy of Muslims over non-Muslims, the permanent persecution of gays, blasphemers and apostates, and the permanent removal of all rights not accorded by the Qur’an and the Hadith. For Muslims, “human rights” means only the rights of Muslims over all others and the rights of Muslim men over all Muslim-owned children, women, slaves and animals. *That* is what’s really going on here.
Paco says
Just look at the photograph accompanying this article , have you ever seen anything as dark and evil as this,
My God , how could we ever accept and live among these creatures !!
Ade Fegan says
We ain’t seen nothing yet
UNCLE VLADDI says
This is pure TAQIYYA. Even in sharia law (see The Hedaya) a male doctor (and they had no female doctors, of course!) is exempt from the “prohibited degrees” and is entitled to see any part of a woman not related to him.