“The government has again revised a report that is supposed to update Canadians on the major terrorist threats they face, removing all references to Islamist extremism.”
Robert Spencer rightly referenced Justin Trudeau as “Canada’s Obama” upon the Trudeau’s election in 2015.
“While the report, first released in December, had initially identified attackers “inspired by violent Sunni Islamist ideology” as the main terrorist threat to Canada, that line has now been cut.”
Consider the parallel approach in the face of the threat of jihad between the Trudeau government and Obama Administration:
Donald J. Trump’s National Security Strategy, published in December 2017, flew in the face of every effort by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and those who manipulate the “Islamophobia” subterfuge. It identified the jihad threat to America, a departure from the policy of the Obama administration, which purged any use of language that accurately described the role of Islamic doctrine, law, and scripture inanalyzing the ideology behind global Islamic terrorism.
In 2009, a senior Obama White House aide urged the U.S. government to desist from using the term “jihadist”—“asserting that terrorists are simply extremists.” Two years later, the White House ordered a scrubbing of all training materials government-wide that Islamic groups deemed to be offensive. The Obama White House then issued a formal edict to remove all teachings on Islam from law enforcement, intelligence, and the military, while the FBI disposed of “pages of information that warned about the threat from the Brotherhood.”
Canada is in deep trouble at the hands of an appeasing government which refuses to identify its worst enemies; a government which also lead the charge on the UN Migration Pact, supports open door immigration and has gone so far as to even welcome Islamic State jihadists, because in Trudeau’s mind they can be “a powerful voice for deradicalization”.
Although the Trudeau government also enraged India over removal of the term “Sikh extremism“, it is pertinent to understand that there is no global war on terror against Sikhs. It is contained within a region, much like many other faction wars, for example, in skirmishes involving the Irish Republican Army and the war with the Tamil Tigers that Sri Lanka ended 10 years ago, but has still left scars etc. The global war on jihad terror however threatens all infidel countries. It is a 1400 year violent and stealth war based on conquest and Islamic supremacism. The Trudeau government’s recklessness in failing to identify–and thus target–the biggest threat to Canadians, merely allows that threat to proliferate and further threatens public safety. It also poses a clear risk to its neighbor, the United States. Such an approach is as preposterous as omitting references to Nazism and Communism during the height of wars against both forces of totalitarianism.
“Government removes all mention of ‘Sunni’ and ‘Shia’ extremism from terrorism threat report”, by Stewart Bell, Global News, April 2, 2019:
The government has again revised a report that is supposed to update Canadians on the major terrorist threats they face, removing all references to Islamist extremism.
While the report, first released in December, had initially identified attackers “inspired by violent Sunni Islamist ideology” as the main terrorist threat to Canada, that line has now been cut.
All mentions of “Sunni” and “Shia” extremism were also taken out of the annual report, along with section headings on both types of terrorism.
The government had already cut the term “Sikh extremism” from the report following complaints. A section heading on violence linked to the fight for an independent Sikh homeland is now gone.
“The content is still there, but some subheads were removed,” Scott Bardsley, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale’s spokesperson, said Thursday.
He later added that the report had “unintentionally maligned certain communities” and the government wanted a “bias-free approach” to terms used to describe terrorism.
“A broader review of the language used to describe extremism is ongoing.”…..
Frank Anderson says
How many people reading here need a collaborating tool of Islamic conquest to use an oxymoronic term like Islamic extremism? The only Islamic extremists are those who leave islam for more peaceful relationships. Islam is a criminal conspiracy pretending to be a religion which aims at the brutal conquest of the world, nothing less. If we look to muslims and collaborators to tell us the truth, we are suckers who deserve our fate.
Jay says
Exactly! Great post Frank. Thank you.
Richard D Koethe says
The Homeland Security Subcommittee for Terrorism stopped publishing the monthly terrorist incident report inJan 19. It was probably because muslim extremism leads the way.
Westman says
Like you wrote, Frank, it is the Orthodox, Devout, Traditionalist, Muslims that produce violent jihad. The only thing that stands between the public of the West and that realization is reading the Quran. Just reading Sura 9 would cause most westerners to realize that the aggressive, violent, nature of Islam’s core has no place in the West. And reading Allah’s torture methods in the Quran would give a true picture of the callous, fake god that Muhammad invented.
Islam is the world’s largest and most successful Ponzi scam, promising, in exchange for a person’s lifetime, rewards that it cannot deliver; and its greatest undeliverable rewards are reserved for violent jihadis.
Frank Anderson says
Westman, I agree that reading the koran is one of two first steps to knowing for yourself instead of opining based on what others say and write. The problem with the koran is that it is ordered in the sequence of the longest chapter (sura) first. That scrambles completely any sense of development. Imagine taking the entire Bible and putting all the chapters in order of longest first. Who could make any sense of the story? Bill Warner published the Simple Koran, which put it into chronological order, and then the Abridged Koran which removed a lot of repeated passages and focused on what is taught regarding worthless kafirs, non-muslims. It is much easier to make sense of how this “information” was concocted to enslave the world.
Right along with the Abridged Koran, I recommend Spencer’s Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades, for an excellent, easy to read, statement of WHY we need to know what is taught.
If you really want to get motivated to reading more, Mark Gabriel, who was a teacher of Islamic History before he left islam, wrote The Unfinished Battle. I appreciate his statement (paraphrased) that if islam is such a great deal why were 4,000,000 Egyptians killed forcing it on Egypt. Page 52.
I treasure many teachings of Judaism. One in particular says that wisdom is all around us. Wherever wisdom is in human hands, there is also some measure of error or deception, no matter how hard anyone tries to remove them. I have now read more than 25 books from a whole spectrum of authors, and spent somewhere in the order of 2 years here reading and writing, all the time learning. If you really want to know for yourself start reading and try not to stop.
gravenimage says
Frank, the term used was even worse than “Islamic extremism”–it was “Islamist extremism”–a double euphemism. As I noted, though, still too close to the truth from these dhimmi tools.
mortimer says
Frank, I think the term you want is ‘pleonasm’ … or ‘redundancy’. To say Islamic extremism is similar to saying Nazi extremism. Islam may be called ‘extreme’ in the way it deals with women, apostates and critics.
Islam when correctly practiced is ‘extremely’ cruel and brutal. Most Muslims today do not practice over 60% of Sharia law. They are lax Muslims, but Islam is not ‘lax’.
I think it is fair and useful sometimes to use ‘Radical Islamist’. ISIS members are ‘radical Islamists’ who want to implement ALL of Sharia law and implement a complete imitation of Mohammed.
Frank Anderson says
Mortimer, thank you for the alternatives.
ninetyninepct says
“inspired by violent Sunni Islamist ideology”
This needs to be replaced by the more accurate “violent Muslim ideology”.
Frank Anderson says
99pct, please forgive me: I don’t see where I have ever bothered trying to distinguish among muslim sects. All that I have read about agree that violent spread and conquest is the standard goal of islam as taught in the “final, perfect, complete and unchangeable” version. Anyone who departs from those teachings with any kind of reform is an apostate subject to the standard death penalty.
Renate says
“Islam is a criminal conspiracy pretending to be a religion which aims at the brutal conquest of the world” and that is why Trudeau cozies up to them. Never forget that the Liberal Party of Canada has been in bed with corrupt companies like SNC Lavalin for years. Corruption is the Liberal way, especially when a Trudeau is heading up the Liberal Party.
Terry Gain says
The Left is in bed with Islam. It seems that they have bought into “see what brown can do for you”. Of course if Islam was a true religion rather than a totalitarian political ideology, the Left would despise Islam.
Lu says
“Of course if Islam was a true religion rather than a totalitarian political ideology, the Left would despise Islam.”
That’s a very fundamental claim. If true it means that the Left is just a total and patently obvious treason of the Western free societies; I mean the non-communist left if there’s still any. The cultural Marxists are clearly enemy of anything Western – they are just Marxists plain and simple, only in a new guise, no “treason” label needed.
mortimer says
Lu, they are ‘globalist’ Marxists and moreover they are in bed with CRONY CAPITALISM.
The combination of socialism plus crony capitalism was invented by MUSSOLINI and that ideology has a name: fascism.
The new leftist ‘PROGRESSIVES’ are actually practicing a GLOBALIST FASCISM guaranteeing unlimited profits to a small coterie of GLOBALIST MEGA-COMPANIES.
This world-wide crypto-capitalist empire would be ruled from an elite in Europe if everything goes according to their plans.
Fritz says
This spineless pandering to terrorists and their ideology will cost us dearly in decades to come.
gravenimage says
Yes, Fritz–it is already costing us.
Nautikos says
Let us all work on throwing this clown Trudeau and his MUSLIM minister of immigration out of office come October!
Abraham Fox says
It is the only hope we have.
Frank Anderson says
A.F., a genuinely polite word of encouragement: If the US can endure 8 years of disaster under Obama, there should always be an alternative plan to endure most anything. Think about the primary alternatives to see what else can be done: “Convert, Submit, Die”, Resist or Escape. Resistance in Nazi and Communist control is a dangerous path generally leading to death. Those examples from history are not far off from what is intended today by the modern totalitarian, globalist agenda. How much oppression are you willing to accept?
Walter Sieruk says
This Trudeau government of Canada which is embracing a policy of removing all mention of the term “Islamist extremism” is a policy of confusion and ignorance . First , there is no such genuine word” “Islamist.’ its a fake word. Second , Even though the words “Muslim extremism” is better than the first bogus term.
It’s not actually accurate .This is because what Westerners view as a Muslim who is extremist” The view of the Muslims in the Islamic East ,only see the same Muslim as “Committed to fight for the Cause of Allah”
Therefore this is a very appropriate time to reiterate a very important message
As the word “Islamism” is a fake word that used that was made up after September 11, 2001 in order offend or upset non-violent Muslims. The real, actual, word is just “Islam.” Likewise, the world “Islamist” is also a bogus word that was made up after 9/11 in order not to offend or upset peaceful Muslims. To keep with reality, terms should better be used as “Islamic terrorist” or “Muslim terrorist” . Let’s call people and thing as the really are.
Furthermore, the terms “Radical Muslim” and “Islamic extremist” is actually a misuse of terms. “Moderate Muslim” are actually Western term and not that well known in the Islamic Middle East. This is because what In the Islamic mindset in the Muslim Middle East as well as in Indonesia and other Muslim controlled countries what the non-Muslims of the Western nations view as “radical and “extremist” the Muslims of those places in the world see as “Normal” and even Devout and committed to the Cause of Islam”. Likewise they view those who Westerns see as “Moderate Muslims” those of the Islamic worldview and non-devout and non –committed Muslims. The violent jihadists even see them as “hypocrites.” Therefore, this explains the jihadist chant of those jihad-minded Muslims in different Islamic terror organizations. When they chant out loud “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” Meaning Death to people who and not Muslims and people who are non- jihadist Muslims.
Concerning the last part of this above essay, the violent spirit of that vicious jihadist chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” The later word of the chant “hypocrites” in the jihad –minded Muslim worldview is further explain in the book titled JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH by Jamie Glazov , for on page 42 the reader is informed that “Islam mandates that devout and real Muslims must punish , and in some circumstances kill, those Muslims whom they regard as neither legitimate nor properly devout.”
Walter Sieruk says
The awful new politically correct policy of the Trudeau Canadian government reflects of ignorant and confused way of thinking of Trudeau himself.
There is much talk about rooting out the ideology of Muslim terrorism. Not “Islamist extremism.” What is not mentioned is that the foundation of this type of terrorism is the theology of Islam’s “holy book” the Quran. For the Quran instructs in the uses of violence and killing for the advancement of Islam. As found in, for example, 2:191. 5:33. 9:5, 111.123. 47:4. Therefore Islam is a false ,dangerous and deadly religion.
Terry Gain says
“Canada is in deep trouble at the hands of an appeasing government which refuses to identify its worst enemies; a government which also lead the charge on the UN Migration Pact, supports open door immigration.”
……………………..
As everyone who went to public school in the 1950’s knows, the past tense of lead is led, yet we keep seeing this mistake. Is it an inadvertent mistake caused by Autocorrect or is it a nation wide conspiracy to drive me over the edge?
owensgate says
The mid 50’s were the last time anyone was taught the truth in public schools.
alex says
I agree. As well, my pet peeve is when people confuse the words “your” and “you’re”, even though English is their first language. With “lead” instead of “led”, perhaps it’s because of the spelling and pronuciation of the element “lead” (Plumbum on the periodic table).Finally, it’s “Would you like to *lie* down?” and not “Would you like to lay (sic) down?” All right, now I’m sounding like a spelling and grammar Nazi 🙁
owensgate says
One of the worst irritants is someone who inserts “you know” three or four times in a spoken paragraph. Nothing sounds as uneducated as that, and, “you know”, some of these people supposedly have University, “you know”, degrees. First time they say it, I know they’re going to say it again at least three more times in the next two sentences. Really, REALLY grates on the audio nerve. They’re, their and there is another. We need more “Grammar NAZI’s”.
Frank Anderson says
owensgate, I agree about “you know”. I would add “as well”. There seemed to be a contest going on a weather channel between the cast as to who could throw in “as well” the most times in an 8 minute segment. Both are sad commentaries of the speaking disability that is passed in schools.
gravenimage says
I’ve worked as an editor and proofreader, so I know how you feel… 🙂
GROO the Wonderer says
+1
?
Dusty says
They are not fooling this particular Canadian. I know exactly what the threat is and who is aiding and abetting it.
Michael Garant says
same here.
Brian says
This Canadian says Trudeau is a fool and a liar. Therefore we cannot believe anything he says or his government publishes. The biggest threat to Canada is Islam.
Dan says
Several years ago in Calgary, about a dozen Israeli supporters, men and women, were bludgeoned to the curb, some kicked unconscious, by between 50 and 100 Muslims.
A few months later, Ezra Levant held an “anti-violence” rally, with a very visible presence by Calgary’s Jewish community, and everything was peaceful.
Except, kept out by a massive police presence, the PACKED STREET of Muslims were screaming the typical pro Hitler/antisemitic rhetoric, giving Nazi salutes.
Passing cars also frothed various anti Jewish sentiments too, and I had had to go through security points to attend Levant’s rally.
Once things got going, the speakers were all about about refusing to submit to or participate in hate, and things had more of a Sunday afternoon BBQ feel, with music and dancing.
Hearing there was going to be a Palestinian the next day, I went, and it was the exact opposite,
The speakers all going on about “Evil Israel,” yada yada, etc.etc., and across the street there was only one older man waving the Israeli flag.
The protestors probably decided beating up one old man with a flag might not play well in the media so, they went after a Christian group putting on a free BBQ.
Since, the same sort of Islamic vitriol has spread all over Alberta, even to communities too small to qualify as a city.
Terry Gain says
And yet Andrew Scheer celebrates Ramadan.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that account.
DogOnPorch says
Trudeau loves Islam…and everything to do with it. Including the terror bits, obviously.
Peter Dale says
What a difference the approach of an election makes! And what do you do to win support among certain groups of people? You don’t upset them. You make nice nice. You pay them when they are not nice. You develop amnesia when necessary. You expect them to vote for you. Why is anyone surprised?
gravenimage says
Not every leader acts like this.
Peter Dale says
Name one.
CRUSADER says
ACT! FOR CANADA
AGISSONS! POUR LE CANADA
http://www.ACT for Canada .ca
ACT! For Canada is a forum for citizens concerned about the triumphalist brand of Islam that seeks to erode our cherished western principles of free speech and equality with the goal of eventual Islamic supremacy in the West.
We are fighting to protect our Country by speaking out in defense of our democratic values, our security and our liberty against the rise of Islamism. And we’re fighting for the protection of Canada’s national security.
ACT volunteers from across the country are mobilizing to make a difference in their communities and for their nation.
DON’T JUST LOVE CANADA – ACT! FOR CANADA!
Kepha says
I’d vote to remove Trudeau, too, except for one hitch–I’m not a Canadian.
gravenimage says
Canada: Trudeau government omits all references to “Islamist extremism”
……………….
Even euphemisms are too close to the truth for Trudeau.
unoriginal username says
Canada is a stupid, cucked “nation” filled with smug, virtue signalling idiots who show no sign of ever coning to their senses. Not all Canadians, but enough. I’m Canadian, by the way. This place is getting dumber by the day.
On the plus side, the lefties are losing their grip on power all over the country. The majority of the country is now governed by political parties, and the liberals are showing their hateful globalist agenda and making fools of themselves all over the place, so hopefully they’ll be out on their commie asses in October.
Trudope looks like he’s giving a blow job in that picture.
gravenimage says
Not all Canadians are like this–there are many patriotic Canadians at Jihad Watch, including Christine Douglass-Williams herself.
And remember that Canada had better leadership than the US just a couple of years ago.
unoriginal username says
I know, there’s still a lot of good people in Canada. I need to remind myself of that. That’s who we have to fight for-them, ourselves, and our kids.
I made a typo with my fat fingers in my previous comment; it should have read “The majority of the country is now governed by conservative political parties”
gravenimage says
+1
Demsci says
I know, it is maddening what the Trudeau government is doing. And some of us are so alarmed that they fear power grab by Muslims sooner or later in the West.
And Trudeau is merely one of a MAJORITY who does not see the danger and call those who do “Islamophobe”. Islam-savvy pro-democratic people are in the minority, it seems to me.
Therefore, while I am at a loss what to do to combat Islam, except for fighting it with peaceful democratic ways as long as possible I do think we can try to influence the political corrects and ignorant press, political and ordinary people, who so arrogantly dismiss us. Who never even study Islam, never even engage or persevere in rational debate, compromise. They think they have the majority and power and do not need us.
Listen, for those of us who become really really desperate, they can say; If Islam takes over, everything is over anyway!!!
So then we do not care about climate problems and we will arrogantly dismiss, even refuse to acknowledge facts and logic when the political correct leftists come asking us to help with climate change measures. About which the leftists seem desperate!!!
If we are equally desperate we can block them with their fears, as they block us with ours.
They don’t want to be saved from Islamic takeover, and we can choose not to be saved from climate change disasters. Until there is COMPROMISE.
Frank Anderson says
Demsci, the first step to resisting the ongoing conquest is to learn why you should resist and then to help others, even one at a time, see why they should join in the resistance.
The opposition is a criminal conspiracy pretending to be a religion that worships and practices murder, conquest, slavery, oppression and misery. How much liberty are you willing to give away to reach a compromise with a group that makes lying and deception an integral part of its teaching and practice? In islam there is no Golden Rule, nor any prohibition against bearing false witness. On the contrary. So how can any compromise today be trusted even for the least amount of time after it is “reached”? Kafirs are given only 3 choices by their muslim masters, “Convert, Submit or Die”. There is nowhere in the “final, perfect, complete and unchangeable” islam any room for compromise with sub-humans.
Jack Holan says
The Word COMPROMISE-does not exist in the Jihadist language of War with Infidels.
Frank Anderson says
Jack, the word does exist; but only as part of the standard lying and deception that goes all the way back to the beginning. A fortified community of Jews were promised if they would put down their weapons, they would be given safe passage. The men were killed. The women and children were enslaved. Anything the Perfect Man did is the Perfect Example to be followed. Negotiating with liars is a waste.
Carol the 1st says
Frank…seeing you mention “criminal conspiracies” again is excellent since I just watched a video (the last one below) where Steve Bannon is proposing active use of the RICO law in the US. Bannon is also making a concerted effort in Europe (Trisulti Monastery to be exact) with the support of cardinals (like Burke) to defend the Judeo-Christian West in as concerted a manner as the likes of Pope Francis and George Soros work to undermine it. I’ll first add just the titles to two other recent videos that can help fill people in. Such good news!!:
– by Dr. Turley “Steve Bannon and Civil War in the Catholic Church”
– by DW News “Italy: Steve Bannon Populist Academy in the Trisulti Monastery|Focus on Europe”
– by EWTN “World Over – 2019-04-04 – Steve Bannon with Raymond Arroyo”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuUc8JZQen8
Carol the 1st says
Correction to first sentence – Bannon is describing AG’s using RICO laws in order to sue the Catholic Church for past abuses.
Frank Anderson says
Carol1, RICO is found online by searching for 18 United States Code Section 1961 and following. Even though there is a civil enforcement provision, it seems that private parties are limited in making use of the statutes. There are a number of criminal conspiracy statutes in the US Code, for example 18 USC 371 and 241. All depend on a state or federal prosecutor getting approval to file and argue a case. There is at least one court decision that says enforcement of RICO is a matter of concurrent jurisdiction between state and federal courts, plus Article 6 Clause 2 of the Constitution which says “[Federal Law] shall be the supreme law of the land and the judges of every state shall be bound thereby; anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” I’m not sure, and bow to anyone with better information, that inserting RICO would make much difference in determining the legal truth about islam. I can see where it would complicate the presentation.
The first time islam is presented with success as a criminal conspiracy, it loses the shield of “religion” and becomes recognized for what it is. A 1400 year fraud; and the house of cards would begin to fall. That will not happen until someone presents the argument as many times as it takes to win.
Please consult a currently licensed attorney practicing in your jurisdiction for any legal advice.
Demsci says
I hear you, Frank, but I hasten to emphasize I meant compromise with the leftists who de facto conspire with the Muslims!
Frank Anderson says
We are on the same page to be sure. I have had to deal with many liars in a number of high places which has taught me the words they use should never be trusted.
Demsci says
Irritate the leftists by calling them “Climatophobes” or something, see how they like that.
Demsci says
I guess our “North Star”, our positive goa,l is to save our democratic governmental system and some key values. And so I guess we ourselves will never engage in anti-Democratic measures or coups. So the REAL far-right, Neo-Nazi’s etc, is our enemy too.
But we think that Islam too leads to dictatorial states, oppression etc. and we are pretty serious about that. And we think the majority does not see the need to engage Islam as we do, OK.
But when our political opponents hinder us, we hinder them, when they help us, we help them. Or we can at least consider this.
Left Coast says
But if Hitler was a socialist, how come that these “far-Rightists” still admire him?
The description “Far-Right” is a great misnomer for the successors of Hitler in modern-day Germany. As we will see below, modern-day German neo-Nazis are demonstrably just as Leftist as Hitler was. So are American, British and Australian neo-Nazis also Leftist in any sense?
The answer to that is a simple one: They are pre-war Leftists, just as Hitler was. They are a relic in the modern world of thinking that was once common on the Left but no longer is. They are a hangover from the past in every sense. They are antisemitic just as Hitler was. They are racial supremacists just as Hitler was. They are advocates of discipline just as Hitler was. They are advocates of national unity just as Hitler was. They glorify war just as Hitler did etc. And all those things that Hitler advocated were also advocated among the prewar American Left.
That does however raise the question of WHY such thinking is seen as “Rightist” today. And the answer to THAT goes back to the nature of Leftism! The political content of Leftism varies greatly from time to time. The sudden about-turn of the Left on antisemitism in recent times is vivid proof of that. And what the political content of Leftism is depends on the Zeitgeist — the conventional wisdom of the day. Leftists take whatever is commonly believed and push it to extremes in order to draw attention to themselves as being the good guys — the courageous champions of popular causes. So when the superiority of certain races was commonly accepted, Leftists were champions of racism. So when eugenics was commonly accepted as wise, Leftists were champions of eugenics — etc. In recent times they have come to see more righteousness to be had from championing the Palestinian Arabs than from championing the Jews so we have seen their rapid transition from excoriating antisemitism to becoming “Antizionist”.
mortimer says
What is omitted in people’s comments is often as significant as what is included.
Jihadi Justin is in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization.
Machiavelli said, ‘Be very sure that our friends never speak ill of us.’
Elizabeth thorne says
I am very confident Justine and all his liberal head bobbers will be wiped out in the next election, no party status is where they are headed. Freeland thinks, or at least she says, Islamophobia is the greatest threat in the world today–no,it is the Liberal loons. They don’t got no idea what they are talking about–please excuse my grammer. lol lol lol
Left Coast says
Eliminating all references to Radical Izzlam is exactly what you would expect from a PM who dressed in Arab Garb knelt on a rug in a Whabbi Mosque and Repeated the Believers’ Prayer with his buddy Algebra.
Canada’s low intellect PM is easily played by those around him and his values instilled by his marxist father are certainly showing today !
ninetyninepct says
The Trudeau Government is forcing and manipulating our Canadian Institutions to blindly obey their disgusting beliefs. This includes CSIS, Immigration, the Courts and the RCMP.
We Canadians have no choice but to make whatever preparations we think we need to defend ourselves from Trudeau and his disgusting Liberals and to enforce our laws. He is forcing this country into anarchy. If violence is what is needed to cleanse Canada from the Liberals and “peaceful” theocracy, then so be it.
Elizabeth Thorne says
lol Grammar, I can spell. M-103 does not seem to cover all the Imams spewing hate and talking about the caliphate. Ask any Imam, the foremost duty of Islam in the world is to depose Jahiliyyah from the leadership of man, and to take the leadership into its own hands and enforce a particular way of life that is permanent–ISLAM
Paddy OConnor says
Missing the mark focussing on Trudeau..Trudeau is just a candyass boy being fed and controlled by his Muslim Brotherhood masters in the Cabinet.Just like Obama.