In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I discuss: Tlaib and Omar: The Eternal Cry-Bullies, and I unveil a malicious strategy that is straight out of the psychopath’s playbook.
Don’t miss it!
Order my new book: Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us.
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.
PABLO says
In the 21st century, “Muslims” are always the victims even when they are the perpetrators.
CRUSADER says
The Greatest Trick the Devil Ever Pulled
Was Convincing the World He Didn’t Exist !
Walter Sieruk says
Those two Muslim politicians Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib being so very anti-Jewish and anti-Israel must also be, in hidden essence, very anti-American .As the former US President ,William Howard Taft, had so wisely declared in a speech “Antisemitism is a noxious weed that should be cut out. It has no place in America.”
Furthermore, by using such a foul terms as Rep.Rashida Tlaib did by calling the President “m….. f…..” had exposed what a very low class and totally unsophisticated as well as unintelligent woman she actually is. For a person with any class , sophistication and intelligence might strongly dislike someone but wouldn’t use such vulgarity of language as Tlaib did. She by speaking in that absence low class way has also thrown shame on the office her holds in the US government Could be that Tlaib may be trying to shows herself unfit for the office she now holds ?
mortimer says
Agree … too true! A… “totally unsophisticated as well as unintelligent woman”.
abad says
Walter:
It is ironic, isn’t it, how Tlaib (and Omar, for that matter) are capable of trashy talk, like members of a gang.
Whoopsie.
Islam is the largest organized gang in the world.
Makes 20 Love and the Latin Kings look insignificant, no?
underbed cat says
It may be that these two speak harshly for the adoration of one audience and with disdain to the other audience. They know who they speak for and they heard her loud and clear. It will soon become clear hopefully why there is this divide, some are informed and have clearly called them out. The truth will ultimately rise to public knowledge however with years of the deception, and clever false face and claims, some will hear these comments and finally recognize these comments do not seem tolerant. Surprises many but not the informed.
CRUSADER says
Two headed SNAKES !!!
Good call, there, underbed cat….
Come out from under the bed, and join up with ACT for America!!!
http://www.ACTforAmerica.org/issues
mortimer says
Why did voters elect candidates who hate Jews and hate Americans? I think this is unique in US history. What is wrong with those voters? They elected a tool of the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization.
It’s historically wrong to suggest that there was widespread Arab support for Jewish settlement in the Mandatory Palestine governed by United Kingdom. The UK tried to limit Jewish settlement. During the Mandate, Jews purchased land (sometimes from landowners living in Constantinople) and built their own homes. I don’t know of any Arabs or Arab charitable agencies that welcomed Jews into the region.
Rather than admit her Jew hatred is wrong, Ilhan Omar tries to claim the accusation against her is not valid. She uses distraction to try to wiggle out of a valid criticism concerning her Jew hatred.
James Lincoln says
mortimer states correctly:
“She uses distraction to try to wiggle out of a valid criticism concerning her Jew hatred.”
Like many Muslims, she has an inability to accept any personal responsibility for her actions. She lies, gets defensive, deflects, distorts, plays the victim, etc., ad nauseum…
That type of behavior is infuriating to people who use evidence-based logic.
CRUSADER says
Glazov makes the point, which he expounds upon in “Jihadist Psychopath”,
that the fascinating and telling aspect of these CRY-BULLIES is found in their replies
and responses (and who backs them up!):
Playing the victim card after they’ve done their assault is classic Stealth Jihad,
like SCORPIONS that they are, their hind tail stings while their front claws say,
“we didn’t do it! we are innocent! how dare you blame us! blame yourself!!!”
Classic devilish playbook! Classic way the Leftists also operate!
Left and Islam have learned from each other.
Red blends with Green….into a horrid color of sh*t!!!
Axis of Evil.
Benedict says
Muslims are indeed victims. They are victims of a seductive, obstinate, hate-induced and inducing fabrication called Islam. An ideology that first and foremost appeals to human pride and gladly employs the sinful human nature in its service: “The use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient to the propagation of the faith”, writes Edward Gibbon about the prophet of Islam, because Gibbon had perceived the deceptive, ugly nature of this heresy. And if truth is not our companion on all our ways, what then is the destination of the traveler?
Where is the wisdom, the gracious attitude and social circumstances that can compel a Muslim to leave his miserable “deen” and his fake prophet? If a Muslim by accident or curiosity visited JIHAD WATCH and read some random articles and comments, he would leave more obstinate convinced of his faith than ever before, because here is not where these transforming qualities are found. I’m certain that I for one don’t exhibit them, it’s just not my department.
A Muslim is not argued, debated or ridiculed out of his faith, although it can be fun, entertaining and challenging to try. But the question must be asked, especially in a forum like this: Why do Muslims not en masse leave Islam, when they don’t live under a government that demands obedience to its foolish traditions? What does it take to move them and where has our persuasion failed?
I will go and buff my halo and come back later to see, if anyone has come up with some credible answers – and if anyone hasn’t, there is a possibility that silence will bring condemnation.
CRUSADER says
Halo shines brightly enough in quoting Gibbon….
But, ever hear of circling the wagons, keeping powder dry, scan for hostiles,
and mind the windage and elevation, so to shoot what ya aim at?
Not sure if it’s the point of Jihad WATCH to be convincing Muslims
to convert to something less horrific than Islam.
(Perhaps the moniker fellow “mortimer” can expound on that part of matters….)
Just as it isn’t the point of NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH to turn
a criminal into a saint….
Get the drift?
Main point, derived from below, is to RALLY those “conscious” against Shari’ah,
and to EDUCATE those “unconscious” about the threats of Islam.
================
Why “Jihad Watch” ?
Because non-Muslims in the West, as well as in India, China, Russia, and the world over, are facing a concerted effort by Islamic jihadists, the motives and goals of whom are largely ignored by the Western media, to destroy their societies and impose Islamic law upon them — and to commit violence to that end even while their overall goal remains out of reach.
That effort goes under the general rubric of jihad.
Jihad (Arabic for “struggle”) is a central duty of every Muslim.
Muslim theologians have spoken of many things as jihads: the struggle within the soul, defending the faith from critics, supporting its growth and defense financially, even migrating to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of spreading Islam. But violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history and a central element of Islamic theology. Many passages of the Qur’an and sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad are used by jihad warriors today to justify their actions and gain new recruits. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, which denies unbelievers equality of human rights and dignity, is available today for anyone with the will and means to bring it to life.
In Islamic history and doctrine violent jihad is founded on numerous verses of the Qur’an — most notably, one known in Islamic theology as the “Verse of the Sword”: “Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is forgiving, merciful” (9:5). Establishing “regular worship” and paying the “poor-due” (zakat) means essentially that they will become Muslim, as these are two of the central responsibilities of every Muslim. Sahih Bukhari, which Muslims regard as the most trustworthy of all the many collections of traditions of Muhammad, records this statement of the Prophet: “Allah assigns for a person who participates in (holy battles) in Allah’s Cause and nothing causes him to do so except belief in Allah and in His Messengers, that he will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in the battle as a martyr).”
Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering historian and philosopher, was also a legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that “in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with “power politics,” because Islam is “under obligation to gain power over other nations.”
Violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history. The passages quoted above and many others like them form a major element of the motivation of jihad warriors worldwide today. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, with all its assumptions about unbelievers‚ lack of human rights and dignity, is available today as a justification for anyone with the will and the means to bring it to life.
Jihad Watch is dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology play in the modern world and to correcting popular misconceptions about the role of jihad and religion in modern-day conflicts. By shedding as much light as possible on these matters, we hope to alert people of good will to the true nature of the present global conflict.
Jihad Watch also includes content once posted on Dhimmi Watch, formerly a separate page on this site, tracking dhimmitude.
Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, “protected people,” are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur’an’s command that they “feel themselves subdued” (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race.
If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it.
Spearheaded by dhimmi academics and self-serving advocacy groups, that same attitude of chastened subservience has entered into Western academic study of Islam, and from there into journalism, school textbooks, and the popular discourse. One must not point out the depredations of jihad and dhimmitude; to do so would offend the multiculturalist ethos that prevails everywhere today. To do so would endanger chances for peace and rapprochement between civilizations all too ready to clash.
But in this era of global terrorism it must be said: this silence, this distortion, has become deadly. Before 9/11 it was easy to ignore and whitewash dhimmitude, but the atrocities changed the situation forever. In jihads throughout history, untold millions have died. Tens of millions have been uprooted from their homes. Tens of millions have been stripped of their cultural identity. To continue to gloss over the destruction wrought by jihad ideology and its attendant evil of dhimmitude is today to play into the hands of jihadists, who have repeatedly vowed to dhimmify the West and destroy any recalcitrant elements. While jihadist groups, even with their global diffusion, are not strong enough to realize this goal by themselves, they have a potent and destructive ally, a genuine fifth column, in the dhimmi academics and dhimmi journalists they have recruited in the West. They have succeeded in confusing millions in the West into mistaking honesty and truthfulness for bigotry, and self-defense for oppression.
Before it’s too late for Western Europe and the United States, which gave birth to the traditions of freedom and equality of rights for all that shine today as lights in the entire world, this must be stopped.
Therefore Jihad Watch seeks to bring public attention to:
The plight of the dhimmis, an immense but almost completely ignored ongoing scandal that continues in Muslim countries today;
The plight of women under Sharia provisions, similar to conditions imposed on dhimmis, in the denial of equal rights and dignity;
Slavery in Islamic lands, which continues today, justified by Sharia-‘s dhimmi codes;
The integral role of jihad and dhimmitude ideology in global terrorism today;
The license that academic and journalistic whitewashes of dhimmitude gives to radical jihadist enemies of human rights for all.
Jihad Watch fights to ensure that deeds done in the darkness for so long will not continue to be done. The light of world attention is anathema to the proponents of jihad and dhimmitude: we have seen in recent years that women sentenced to stoning for adultery, often victims of rape unjustly accused thanks to Sharia laws disallowing rape victims’ testimony, were freed following international outcry. Jihad Watch seeks to provoke similar, continuous and increasing outcry wherever and whenever the Sharia’s institutionalized injustices threaten dhimmis and women.
May the truth prevail.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/why-jihad-watch
gravenimage says
As CRUSADER notes, it is not the role of Jihad Watch to cajole Muslims into leaving Islam–not that the “filthy Infidels” can do this, in any case–its purpose is to warn Infidels of the threat of Jihad and Shari’ah.
Even less is it the fault of Anti-Jihadists when Muslims do not become apostates, no matter what Benedict may pretend.
The idea that it is Jihad Watch that is forcing Jihadists to remain Jihadists could not be more grotesque.
CRUSADER says
🙂
One exception: I’m certainly no Infidel.
I am *true blue* to the Cross of Christ.
(It’s the Muzzies who are “infidels” !!)
+ + +
gravenimage says
Dear CRUSADER, I use “Infidels” to describe us as Muslims see us–rather tongue-in-cheek. I assure this is not intended to be offensive.
Benedict says
And whose grave image is this? Oh, I see. Has your husband tried out the recipe on you? You know, the one with the sweet potatoes?
gravenimage says
Benedict wrote:
And whose grave image (sic) is this? Oh, I see.
……………………..
Actually, Benedict has no idea what he is talking about.
And I still reject his implication that Muslims waging violent Jihad is the fault of Anti-Jihadists.
More:
Has your husband tried out the recipe on you? You know, the one with the sweet potatoes?
……………………..
Way back during Hannukah, I mentioned in passing that my husband and I were fixing breakfast for each other, and that he was making potato pancakes. For some unknown reason, the idea of a husband and wife having breakfast together *enraged* Benedict. Here’s the bizarre sweet potato thing–thread starts here and continues below:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/poll-finds-overwhelmingly-that-islam-is-unwelcome-in-germany#comment-2100634
This was the strangest thing he said, among *many* odd things:
“Surely behind g’s idolatry alluding pseudonym hides a Moloch worshipping, child sacrificing barbarian, a CREEP and an utterly repulsive person who every Friday gulps down potato pancakes in large quantities spiced with her self serving hypocrisy and bigotry”
Needless to say I have never said *anything* that would make anyone believe that I sacrifice children–far from it, I regularly express concern for the suffering of children, especially under Islam.
So what is all of this weirdness about? Who knows?
Marc gave Benedict a warning about his facing banning if he continues his bizarre off-topic claptrap:
marc says
May 19, 2019 at 11:19 pm
can someone PM me if @Benedict goes off topic again so I can ban him please.
@Benedict if you don’t understand the mission statement of this site, find another.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/poll-finds-overwhelmingly-that-islam-is-unwelcome-in-germany#comment-2100888
Apparently Benedict does not care, though.
CRUSADER says
Graven Image, I know you well enough, as a consistent poster from many, many years at Jihad Watch, and I sense you to be a stout and staunch defender of what is true and what matters most.
I was joshing with you a bit. But you know the historical “tit for tat” when it comes to Holy Wars
and who calls whom an “infidel”…..
😉
By the way…. “sweet potatoes” ???
Benedict says
C: let me explain the “sweet potatoes”
Grave image wrote:
“Even less is it the fault of Anti-Jihadists when Muslims do not become apostates, no matter what Benedict may pretend.”
and
“The idea that it is Jihad Watch that is forcing Jihadists to remain Jihadists could not be more grotesque.” –
Here you see g’s method in action: She introduces an absurd idea, that is her own construction, by twisting something I have commented on, and ascribes the distortion to me, and she does that repeatedly, often punctuating it with her favorite invective: Creep! So I have given up on her. She is a nagging, grumpy old woman easily infuriated by commentators who don’t toe the party line – her party line. I had hoped her husband could cure her with sweet potato pancakes and posted her therefore a recipe, but I doubt it’s working, so if you have a better recipe, I suggest you post it to her.
gravenimage says
Thank you, CRUSADER. 🙂
gravenimage says
Glazov Moment: Tlaib and Omar: The Eternal Cry-Bullies
……………….
That’s *exactly* what they are.
Relic says
harvey blew
Eric Jones says
Who will run against Omar and Tlaib when they stand for re-election? That work needs to start now. I say again they should be pressed to state what do they prefer; Sharia or the Constitution. If they give the wrong answer then they committed fraud when they took their oath of office. Legal action could be taken against them for that.
Eric
CRUSADER says
Eric,
Tlaib’s opposition was strong against her in her district during the previous vote.
So, she is most vulnerable. It’s as if she was a “trial” as a Michigan politician.
Her closest opponent was a black women, Dhimmirat of course, and might replace her.
Whereas the Somalians in MN have a strong community and put forth a challenge in that district, seemingly to run roughshod over the liberal Jews in that same district, who might as well just cut their own throats.
Yet, as Omar does her unbridled best to be out front with her inane Un-American-ness, she might have some sort of competition, but her replacement might not be as bad as she is, yet not as good as can be hoped for.
MN is difficult, due to their odd political party system and coalitions.
Sue Merriner says
So what if Liz Cheney or anyone else is an islamophobe? So what?