In a surprise move, the UK government has refused “to adopt a working definition of ‘Islamophobia’ proposed by an all-party Parliamentary group (APPG). The definition, as put forward by the British Muslims APPG in December, determined that Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness”.
What pray tell does “Muslimness” even mean? And why would anyone accept this loose term without demanding an adequate definition of it?
Forcing the term “Islamophobia” upon Western nations boils down to beating anyone up who criticizes Islam. Unsurprisingly, the Conservatives have “come under fire from Muslim groups and Labour MPs” for rejecting the “Islamophobia” definition.
Once again, we see the alliance between far Leftists and Islamic supremacists in their routine manipulation of identity politics. Islamic supremacists and jihadists have long documented their goals for establishing the sharia in infidel countries, so Western leaders who enable their objectives are without excuse. It is high time that the UK government begins to show leadership in the war on terror, and it is doing just that in its rejection of the term “Islamophobia”. It is no secret that the UK has been–up to now– facilitating the Islamization of its own country. Its odious record includes: welcoming in hate preachers, banning truth tellers like Robert Spencer, and even Franklin Graham among others, persecuting Tommy Robinson, refusing Asia Bibi for asylum, turning its back on persecuted Christians, covering up the shocking actions of Muslim rape gangs, and adopting open-door immigration.
In what amounts to a U-turn, the government rejected the APPG’s definition of ‘Islamophobia’, because it “would negatively impact free speech and restrict legitimate criticism of Islam as a belief system, or of Islamic countries.”
Also…
The government has been advised by the Equalities Office that by British law, Islam is a religion and not a race, illustrating one of the issues with the suggestion that Islamophobia be recognised as a type of racism.
In a letter to Prime Minister Theresa May, the leader of Britain’s police chiefs, Martin Hewitt, warned that “anti-terrorist operations would be hampered if Theresa May bows to pressure to create an official definition of Islamophobia.” Hewitt further warned that the definition “risked exacerbating community tensions and undermining counter-terrorist policing powers and tactics“–a risk that would certainly be expedient for Islamic supremacists.
In normative Islam, women are inferior to men, Islam is superior to all other faiths, murdering gays and apostates is prescribed, as is conquest and jihad; and blacks are still being held slaves by Arabs in many countries like: Mauratania, Algeria and Sudan. If normative Islam is defined as “Muslimness“, then those who ascribe to the APPG’s definition of “Islamophobia” are promoting the aforementioned values of the sharia and severely undermining democracy. Under no circumstances should any Western democracy compromise its values of equality between genders, creeds and races and its freedom of speech–which serves as a protection against fascism. Free speech is absent in fascist regimes.
The Liberal Government of Canada adopted ‘anti-Islamophobia’ Motion M-103 which is an infringement upon the rights of Canadians, deems Canada to be a country with a “climate of fear” toward Muslims and in need of government help for this “fear” to be “quelled,” and aims to monitor citizens for compliance as expressed in a followup document to “take action” against “Islamophobia”.
Kudos to the UK government for rejecting the APPG’s definition of “Islamophobia”. Let’s hope that the government does not fold under pressure from Islamic supremacist groups.
It is important to note that the UK Equalities Chief Trevor Phillips “who popularised the term ‘Islamophobia’”–in a stunning admission–finally revealed that he “thought Muslims would blend into Britain” and that he “should have known better”. Phillips “admitted he got almost everything wrong on Muslim immigration in a damning new report on integration, segregation, and how the followers of Islam are creating ‘nations within nations’ in the West.”
“Conservatives Condemned for Rejecting ‘Racism’ Definition of Islamophobia”, by Joe Markham, May 15, Breitbart, 2019:
The Conservatives have come under fire from Muslim groups and Labour MPs for reportedly refusing to adopt a working definition of ‘Islamophobia’ proposed by an all-party Parliamentary group (APPG).
The definition, as put forward by the British Muslims APPG in December, determined that “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness”, reports The Guardian.
While the definition has been accepted and adopted by Labour, the Liberal Democrats and even the Scottish Conservatives, the Conservative Party in England and Wales have yet to adopt the definition due to concerns that it would negatively impact free speech and restrict legitimate criticism of Islam as a belief system, or of Islamic countries. As such, the Conservatives are appointing two advisors to develop a new, less controversial, definition of Islamophobia.
The government has been advised by the Equalities Office that by British law, Islam is a religion and not a race, illustrating one of the issues with the suggestion that Islamophobia be recognised as a type of racism.
The concerns about free speech were also highlighted by Martin Hewitt, Chair of the National Police Chief’s council, who said that the definition was “too broad as currently drafted, could cause confusion for officers enforcing it and could be used to challenge legitimate free speech on the historical or theological actions of Islamic states”.
The senior officer has warned the definition, if adopted, could even impact counter-terrorism operations in future, The Times reports.
Sayeeda Warsi, the former Chair of the Conservative Party, dismissed Hewitt’s concerns as “irresponsible scaremongering”. She said “a non-legally binding working definition” would not negatively impact free speech or hinder the police in doing their job…..
AnneM04031959 says
Not surprised.
mortimer says
Well, I am surprised that good sense has prevailed. I think the very decent and tolerant British people are getting sick and tired of being scolded without cause by supremacist jihadists and Marxist liars.
Tom says
Maybe not common sense so much as fear of the rise in populism. The latest poll of voters in the upcoming EU elections shows the new Brexit party at over 56% with the Tories and Labour way down in the mid teens.
Dawne says
We’ve been sick and tired of it for some time, but unfortunately as the world can now see, our leaders and rulers pay very little attention to the views of the British people.
Any Brit on here – vote Brexit Party in the Euros – whether you want Britain to leave or remain the Euro vote will make no tangible difference, but will give a bloody nose to our MPs who have ignored our democratic vote.
Rufolino says
Hear hear Dawn !
martin says
Dawn, farage betrayed the ukip. He left because he could not get his own way, did not want a governing body, did not want to give members a say. He enginered a series of very unsuitable yes men into leadership who were extremely unsuitable.
Farage will also never criticise islam
He has mocked ukip supporters as being tatooed skinheads etc.
UKIP has established policies as well as the means to ensure we leave the eu on our terms.
How dare you, on this site that exposes islam, recommenend someone who will not but also who mocks and attacks those that do.
Shame on you!
Charles Lutz says
Mortimer, are you also “tolerant” in your consideration that some of your “Marxists” are not “liars” ?
SweetOlBob says
The word “islamophobia” is a made up, meaningless, word meaning, I guess, the fear of islam. Bring your lying, whining, snot flying, worthless butts over here and I’ll show you whose afraid !
It is no way a “Phobia”. It is a tremendous dislike.
But then who wouldn’t dislike any stupid cult that swears to want to kill or enslave you. there is no place in any free country for islam and no room for the lies of muslims.
Ship every last one of them back to some theocratic s-hole where they will be happy dodging camel turds on their walks to the mosque.
Did you ever wonder why the perfect prophet wanted all the ragheads to wash their feet ?
Izit to avoid that smell when you boink your head on the floor ?
(Foogie, Abdul ! You didn’t get between your toes !)
Terry Gain says
Not surprised? Really. I’m astounded.
Mario Alexis Portella says
I believe in freedom of speech, but Islamists don’t respect our ways! https://thegreatarchitect.blog/2019/05/17/776/
CRUSADER says
MAP ~
I picked up your book. It’s good!
Thanks for writing it and bringing attention to your site as well….
You say in your recent article:
Last week Omar Suleiman, founder and president of the Dallas-based Yaqeen Institute—an organization that describes itself as a resource about Islam—led the invocation at the House of Representatives. Controversy spurred because Suleiman has a long record of incendiary social media statements about Israel, calling on multiple occasions for a third Palestinian Intifada, or violent uprising, likened Israeli troops to Nazis, and calling them “the enemies of God.” Despite this, he has not been likened to hate speech by the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi or most lawmakers. While the West is preoccupied with fighting hate speech, Islamophobia, and white supremacist groups, it seems to have willfully ignored the cultivation of Muslim hate speech and supremacist attitudes toward non-Muslims. This discriminatory movement on the part of Muslims is not a dissent from Islamic teaching but part Quranic doctrine.
The Quran states that “the disbelievers among the People of the Book [Jews and Christians] and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding therein; it is they who are the worst of creatures.” As Dr. Bill Warner, founder for the Study of Political Islam said: “When I’m called the worst of creatures, does this qualify for hate speech?” Another verse of the Quran: “Indeed, the vilest of animals in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved [kafirs: Jews and Christians].” The same Warner says: “So I’m the lowest of animals according to Allah. Hate speech?”
……
John Allan says
Put forward by the British Muslims. That says all there is to say. Quite right that the government rejected it. I don’t imagine British Muslims would appreciate being given a definition of British Christians, despite their being resident in a Christian country. If they’re that bothered, they can always go ‘home’.
Dawne says
Quite!
CRUSADER says
Definition of Christian-ness?
Pray tell, what would that be?
JM says
Good post!
JM says
My response was to John Allan’s post, which I think is very good. If Muslims don’t like living the West, why don’t they go back to their own countries?
gravenimage says
Because they want to take over here.
Kay says
I’d like to see the report by Trevor Phillips widely publicized.
R Russell says
All of the Scottish Political Parties have adopted the Definition of Islamophobia. This means Sharia law in Scotland is just around the corner.
Because in the Conclusion on p56 of the 72 paged Definition, it says it is Islamophobia to say minorities are subjugated, it means we could never state that Aasia Bibi was persecuted for being from a minority group.
It says that it is Islamophobic to say Islam was spread by the sword.
The logical conclusion of this will be to prevent Islamic history being available to read in Scotland. Amazon for example may not be allowed to sell Islamic history to Scottish addresses. Will it include the Koran, Hadiths and Sira too?
There is much more. It is truly horrific and Scottish readers must draw to the attention of their MSPs the sharia law within the definition.
The Definition of Islamophobia adopted by all of the Scottish Political Parties.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/599c3d2febbd1a90cffdd8a9/t/5bfd1ea3352f531a6170ceee/1543315109493/Islamophobia+Defined.pdf
Kay says
did this slip through without even being read?
R Russell says
Kay,
In my opinion ALL of the Scottish Political Parties would sell their souls to get the minorities votes and Muslims are a huge chunk of them.
Such a pity they don’t realise it will affect them too – or even scarier, that they would believe themselves to be exempt.
mortimer says
The Scots used to be renowned for their sensibleness. Not anymore. Scottish politicians are certifiable loonytoons! The Scottish people ought to pay more attention to what political candidates actually think. Those idiot politicians should get the heave-ho.
R Russell says
Mortimer,
The Scottish National Party are in power with a mixture of English hatred (The enemy) and benefits for votes. Women now get free sanitary protection every month and nursery places are free. Lots more too. This ensures the work shy and minorities including the LGBTI (if I have got enough of the alphabet? – it keeps getting longer) and English haters all flock to their support and vote for them.
When Sunni Muslim Tanveer Ahmed from Bradford England travelled 200 miles to Glasgow Scotland, to murder Ahmadiyya Muslim, Asad Shah, The First Minister waited 5 months before visiting the Ahmadiyya mosque and asked the Ahamadiyyas to be tolerant! What an insult to a peaceful sect of Islam whose member had been killed because he was Ahmadiyyan.
Every time there is a Muslim attack she goes to Glasgow Central Mosque to assure them she knows the terrorists aren’t ‘real’ Muslims.
Search online for some of the people who attend Glasgow Central Mosque.
When posts are made to blogs on Scottish newspapers about Islam, they are removed if they tell the truth.
Scotland needs prayer. The country where John Knox prayed, ‘Give me Scotland or I die’ (and his prayers were answered) and where Mary Queen of Scots said she feared the prayers of John Knox more than all the armies of Europe is a shadow of what it was even 50 years ago.
May the Lord have mercy.
CRUSADER says
From the land of “BRAVEHEART” ??
============================
Definition of Islamophobia adopted by all of the Scottish Political Parties.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/599c3d2febbd1a90cffdd8a9/t/5bfd1ea3352f531a6170ceee/1543315109493/Islamophobia+Defined.pdf
Having heard a wide cross-section of viewpoints from academic experts, parliamentarians, lawyers, community activists and, importantly, voices from within British Muslim communities, the APPG upon consideration of the vast body evidence presented to us, proposes the following working de nition of Islamophobia:
ISLAMOPHOBIA IS ROOTED IN RACISM AND IS A TYPE OF RACISM THAT TARGETS EXPRESSIONS OF MUSLIMNESS OR PERCEIVED MUSLIMNESS.
Contemporary examples of Islamophobia in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in encounters between religions and non-religions in the public sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
=======================
• Calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of Muslims in the name of a racist/ fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.
• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism, and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
• Accusing Muslims as a group of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing commi ed by a single Muslim person or group of Muslim individuals, or even for acts commi ed by non-Muslims.
• Accusing Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, of inventing or exaggerating Islamophobia, ethnic cleansing or genocide perpetrated against Muslims.
• Accusing Muslim citizens of being more loyal to the ‘Ummah’ (transnational Muslim community) or to their countries of origin, or to the alleged priorities of Muslims worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
• Denying Muslim populations the right to self- determination e.g., by claiming that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is a terrorist endeavour.
• Applying double standards by requiring of Muslims behaviours that are not expected or demanded of any other groups in society, eg loyalty tests.
• Using the symbols and images associated with classic Islamophobia (e.g. Muhammed being a paedophile, claims of Muslims spreading Islam by the sword or subjugating minority groups under their rule) to characterize Muslims as being ‘sex groomers’, inherently violent or incapable of living harmoniously in plural societies.
• Holding Muslims collectively responsible for the actions of any Muslim majority state, whether secular or constitutionally Islamic.
The examples below, which further illustrate ways in which Islamophobia is experienced do not exhaust the phenomena but give shape to its e ects from physical violence (a, b, c) to verbal abuse and intimidation (d, e), and from socio-economic discrimination and exclusion (f, g), to the entrenching of racism in our broader civic life (h and i).
We have used a number of incidents widely reported in the press in order to exemplify some of the forms of expression of Muslimness which are targeted and the type of incidents which qualify as Islamophobia. This is not an exhaustive list, but it is indicative of the breadth of Islamophobia in our society.
===========
SHOCKING!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATKNmdkqRqE
R Russell says
Here is a list of the Churches who approached the UK government about the problems involved if the Definition had been adopted.
https://www.premier.org.uk/News/UK/Church-leaders-question-new-definition-of-Islamophobia
This is from an English website and very often the English seem not to realise Scotland exists. When listing those who have adopted the Definition they have ignored that ALL of the Scottish Political Parties, so I do not know whether the lack of Scottish church leaders in their list is accurate or just been ignored. It could also be because it is a devolved matter. But that shouldn’t prevent them reporting on it.
Certainly the Scottish media hasn’t carried any accounts of the opinions of any Scottish church leaders. Since in my opinion the Church of Scotland is incrementally becoming closer to the end times apostate church I wonder if they would express an opinion anyway. That shouldn’t prevent any other denominations from expressing their viewpoints.
Demsci says
Shocking, I agree.
I had contacts with Muslims in the workforce who were quite outspoken about the naturalness of their idea that their loyalty of course was due to the laws of Islam, the Ummah, the Islamic brethren (not going quite as far as ISIS, but still ….) over and above any loyalties to national laws, interests. But now it is Islamophobic to conclude that, perhaps even to suspect that!!!
Once I heard them talk about Zlatan Ibrahimovic, star soccer player of Sweden. They said that he despised his Swedish co-players because he did not identify himself as Swede but as Muslim first and foremost. I don’t know if that was true, but it was indicative that they approved of such an attitude.
victoria says
what a bunch of jerks. the term ‘islamophobia’ was CREATED by the muslims in order to intimidate non-muslims. wake up folks; you are being hoodwinked ; we all know the real mission of islam and they will stop at nothing, including acting like the victim, while continuing to murder the real victims of islam and its scourge of the planet.
mortimer says
Agree with Victoria. This is implementing Sharia blasphemy laws by secular means. The intent of the ‘Islamophobia’ slander must be understood before it can be used.
The term is logically absurd and intentionally ambiguous so as to confuse thought. Once the term is analyzed, it is clear that the term is a subterfuge for supremacists.
James Lincoln says
mortimer says,
Re: Islamophobia:
“The term is logically absurd and intentionally ambiguous so as to confuse thought.”
Well put, and spot on.
mortimer says
The ‘Islamophobia’ slander is used to prevent any criticism of the political ideology of ISLAMISM … which claims Muslims should rule the world.
Rufolino says
Those whom the gods want to destroy they first send mad…
The islamophobia trope drives people nuts.
Michael Garant says
Totally
CRUSADER says
Anti-Muslim activist visits White House ————
“Islamo-FIGHTER” Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for AMERICA !!!
If SPLC and CAIR say something is “bad”
then you can believe for sure it is “good” and “true” — support it!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drN8dsgSoac
Clive Delmonte says
Islamophobia doesn’t need a definition because it doesn’t exist. People want to discuss FGM, forced marriage, “honour killings” (always of women), kidnapping of girls to Pakistan for forced (child) marriage and consequent sale into slavery, a philosophy of domination, persecution of those who leave Islam, etc., etc. Such people are not “Islamophobic”; this is just the normal political discourse of a democracy.
Anjuli Pandavar says
A little voice in my brain says that Tommy Robinson has spooked the more far-sighted elements of the conservative Party. But a second little voice says that the more far-sighted elements in the Conservative Party are going on the offensive against the Labour Party, you know, the local Jihad Infidel Chapter. Either way, if a government needs to be officially advised that “Islam is not a race”, read, you’re not going to get away with making out that Islam is a race, then my two little voices agree that this does not look like a u-turn at all. It’s going one step back in order to go two steps forward, as in, “the Conservatives are appointing two advisors to develop a new, less controversial, definition of Islamophobia.”
Dawne says
Actually I completely agree with you Anjuli – very astute comment.
CRUSADER says
Sometimes it also takes a bit of Voice from the IRISH !!
Bill Warner PhD:
Resolving the Reality of Political Islam
Irish podcast:
Resolving Reality Radio, an independent Irish media platform,
interviews Bill Warner, PhD. The interview covers many topics
on political Islam and Sharia.
http://www.PoliticalIslam.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKwrFfRBzWA
CRUSADER says
Jihad is a form of Harb.
Harb is a form of Jihad.
Press against the Kafir is a form of Jihad.
Jihad of the:
Sword
Pen
Speech
Money
…….
Yohanan says
a few more links
* https://appgbritishmuslims.org/publications/
“Publications by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslim” includes link to their Nov 27, 2018 “Islamophobia Defined: the inquiry into a working definition of Islamophobia.”
Brendan O’Neill. “We must have the right to mock Muslimness”. Spiked. Masy 15, 2019.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/05/15/we-must-have-the-right-to-mock-muslimness/
Robert B.l Spencer answered this best here in JW and in his many talks and books including in “The politically incorrect guide to Islam and the Crusades/ Robert Spencer.”
Chapter 16: “Islamophobia” and Today’s Ideological Jihad
Chapter 17: Criticizing Islam May Be Hazardous to Your Health
CRUSADER says
Thank you, Yohanan, for those references.
Clive Delmonte says
There is no such concept as “Islamophobia”. In a democracy there are those who wish to discuss forced marriage, “honour killings” (always of women), women’s rights, polygamy, religious freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of expression, the role of state education, FGM, the rule of secular law, etc. Such people are not “Islamophobic. Such freedoms have created our democracy and our Western way of life.
JM says
True. Excellent post.
mortimer says
This is similar to defining the unknown ‘X’ by another unknown term ‘Y’. They want to define the nebulous ‘Islamophobia’ by using the nebulous ‘Muslimness’.
The intent of the proposed definition is to criminalize all criticism of the political ideology of Islamism … the ideology that claims Muslims should rule the world.
Jay says
England is lost!! PM Churchill is not resting easy today! The unfettered invasion by Muslims into England is destroying their soverignity. As it is also doing in France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Australia, etc etc There is no acclimation only demands – no respect for the country that they invade.
They demand welfare, medical, food, housing, etc, less than 5% of Muslims in England actually work.
They use terrorism to create no go zones and commit vicious crimes and attacks!
Europe and England better wake up before it’s too late!! They don’t have much time left!
Only God can save them now!!
Dawne says
God is sleeping on his watch
CRUSADER says
Churchill and King Richard the Lionhearted
still stand as statues outside of UK Parliament….
Rufolino says
For how long ?
Not too far into the future we might wake up one morning to find these marvellous statues decapitated.
I hope our beloved Westminster Abbey is better guarded than Notre Dame…
CRUSADER says
DEUS VOLT !
Jayell says
What’s all this? “Government rejects working definition of “Islamophobia” because it would “restrict legitimate criticism of islam”!!!! So islam can be criticised now, can it? That’s a turn-up for the books! Could this be something to do with the impending demise of a certain T. May?
Jedothek says
Note that the proposed working definition is probably dishonest. Those who framed it are probably educated enough to know that dislike of Islam is not racism – that is, they were lying.
ElderlyZionist says
Well, glory be! I will celebrate one small victory for sanity and for good.
mortimer says
Omeyn, brother. The Globalists in an unholy alliance with ISLAMISM … are losing.
CRUSADER says
Ainsi soit-il
“So be it.”
Rufolino says
Not so fast, mate !
If this is a political move, it cannot be trusted for what it appears to be.
ZIRKSTY (@ZIRKSTY) says
Thank goodness for that.At last a step in the right direction.However the intention to develop a new less controversial definition of so called islamophobia is still concerning as is the fact that Labour,Lib dems and Scottish conservatives have accepted and adopted the original definition. My council is Labour controlled and already islamophilic!
FYI says
muslimness?
muslimyness:playing the “islamophobia” card by taking advantage of our democratic freedoms whilst covertly promoting islam here in the Dar Al Harb.
muslimlessness=a free society devoid of the hypocritical, virtue-signalling,fraudulently pious Holy Yusufs of islam.
muslimnessuselessness;islam’s great role in shaping the modern world
islamophrenia:a serious cognitive delusion,a fabricated persecution complex that afflicts muslims
It’s fun making up stuff..just .like Al lah’s Book of Errors,the “perfect” koran or muhammed being a “prophet”.
Westman says
“Sayeeda Warsi…. said “a non-legally binding working definition” would not negatively impact free speech or hinder the police in doing their job…..”
No more than a gag order! Please tell us again that there were no Muslim grooming gangs and the Police were just imagining that they couldn’t do anything because politicians, like you, would cry ISLAMOPHOBIA.
Keep the gaslighting going until the UK devolves to the age of “Les Miserables”; where young women’s lives are ruined because the powers that be are more concerned about being invited to the social events of the empowered and covering up malfeasance.
Victor Hugo, author of Les Miserables, said one purpose of his novel was to address, “the ruin of women”. The UK government has utterly failed in this regard and is no better than former governments who allowed the contamination of the Thames River and the subsequent deaths of its citizens. The excuse is always, “We didn’t know about the connections at that time”. But the truth is always that someone, not in government, solves the problem in the face of government and business opposition.
The UK government has little excuse for its ignorance about the connection between Islam’s doctrinal works and the grooming gangs. Letting girls be ruined by political correctness, based on a ignorance and apologist falsehoods, is no better than letting citizens die from a polluted river.
James Lincoln says
Westman,
Your statement regarding the UK government:
“Letting girls be ruined by political correctness, based on a ignorance and apologist falsehoods…”
Is undeniably true. By doing nothing, or worse – impeding investigations, they were aiding and abetting the Muslim grooming gangs.
Absolutely despicable.
kono says
It is too late for mother england, and western europe. The only way to save it is to execute the lefts preferred solution for disposing of undesirable elements.
The Gulag. The re-education camp, the re-settlement camp. I cannot see that anyone has the front for that except ‘stasi erica’ merkle. and her claque of former stormtroopers.
The citizen should be, as am I, angry enough to take up arms at the political elite that have brought us to the cusp of yet another atrocity.
I do not wish my civilization be reduced to final solutions over the malignant malfeasance of the self-anointed elite. We have toiled and payed in blood to drag our civilization out of the dark ages of such primitive death cults as marxisim and islam.
None the less, the Consent of the governed is irrelevant, and the citizen is no more than a slave to people who are inveterately evil. Those who rule have transformed our democracies into revolutionary tribunals, gestapo’s, stasi’s and sharia extermination legions. Death marches in the lands of europe, and there is no escaping what is to come. One way or another, the darkness falls. The only way ahead is barbarism on a scale never seen before. There is no other way.
I hope that those rough men called on to do the horrible things required to put down this Byzantine nightmare also clear out the tip of the pyramid as a soupçon. I can only pray that the stain on the soul of humanity does not kill us all.
It’s going to be biblical. You will see things that you will not believe.
This is not what I want. The decisions are made far above my paygrade, and my opinion is not wanted.
CRUSADER says
Belay such talk about “above my pay grade”….
That’s the type of “yada yada yada” which enables society to repeat such nonsense.
Your opinion is indeed wanted!
——————————————
As for Voice of Europe:
https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/04/danish-politician-when-sweden-fails-and-becomes-an-arab-state-we-wont-have-much-in-common-and-we-will-end-the-nordic-passport-union/
Danish politician: “When Sweden fails and becomes an Arab State, we won’t have much in common – and we will end the Nordic Passport Union”
Rufolino says
You are right about one thing, kono: your opinion is “not wanted” by the UK Government.
In most W.European countries, governments are refusing to listen to their people.
With the connivance of the media they foist onto their populations, policies most people DO NOT WANT.
CRUSADER says
All the more reason to keep engaging THE GOOD FIGHT !!
11B40 says
Greetings:
Me, I’m still looking forward to the definition of “kuffarophobia”.
Terry Gain says
The definition you are looking for is Islam
CRUSADER says
The Queer’an contains a majority of what is “revealed”
— that which Mohamhead determined how best to deal with Kuffar….
Despite what Islam says about how Muslims should wash and bow,
the main part of Islam is what to do with Kuffar….
Question:
will there be an update to Islam when all the world finally bows to Mohamhead?
There’s a reason why politicians stick their faces in the sand…
Here’s to having our Asses facing the Moon god !
jarmanray says
Trevor Phillips: “admitted he got almost everything wrong on Muslim immigration in a damning new report on integration, segregation, and how the followers of Islam are creating ‘nations within nations’ in the West.” He needs to re-examine this statement as from 1947 onward, the UK has permitted large numbers of Muslims from Pakistan to immigrate. From 1947 until 2010, unlike the Buddhist and Hindu immigrants from India, the Pakistanis have never fully integrated into English society nor have they enrichted the arts such as literature, Salman Rushdie — “The Ground Beneath Her Feet” or cinematography of Bollywood. The Chinese made dining more pleasurable and the Jews helped bring medical innovations. I simply don’t understand how Phillips could have ignored the facts that until this day, that the for the most part, Pakis live in isolation and rarely blend with other people. At least now some Tories are finally removing their blinders reluctantly as a result of the Brexit party just might form the next government, i.e., follow the money or in this case, follow the votes.
Dawne says
Yes, at root it all comes down to following the votes for politicians – and they thought to cash in on the rapidly increasing number of Muslim votes (shown in British courts to be a higher number of Muslim voters than there are Muslim citizens i.e. proven voter fraud).
This honest little country, where people did not even have to show identification to vote because all trusted the honesty and fair play of their neighbours does not know what has hit it with this swathe of lying, deceiving Muslim immigrants.
I’d also say unequivocally that most English people are in favour of immigration if it’s managed well and if immigrants assimilate, speak English and abide by our laws and values. As I’ve said on other posts, we have Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Zoroastrian immigrants in the UK – do any of them cause these sort of problems? No – it’s just the Muslim communities.
Rufolino says
Excellent, Dawne.
CRUSADER says
Freddie Mercury might’ve agreed.
Brigitte from Germany says
http://chng.it/G7tLwRmGTs
Please, sign and share this important petition about I. Omar.
Thanks.
CRUSADER says
BRIGITTE GABRIEL:
Ilhan Omar has no business on the House Foreign Affairs …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEfGxltTw6E
Savvy Kafir says
The only political party in Britain that I trust or respect is Anne Marie Waters’ For Britain party. The others are just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Barb says
What about Britain First Party?
ntesdorf says
This is a great outcome and a step in the direction of sanity at last.
livingengine says
CAIR’s latest hate report defines Islamophobia as a form of racism. This is based on the thinking (if you want to call it that) of Hatem Bazian. http://www.islamophobia.org/reports/243-hijacked-by-hate-american-philanthropy-and-the-islamophobia-network.html
Catch his act here. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4793739/islamophobia-inquisition-muslim-ban
Nemeth says
The worst of it is that in the UK they are encouraged to do so by the Left who have formed an alliance with Islamists.
CRUSADER says
“Strange Death of Europe”
Douglas Murray —
On Islam And Immigration In Europe
— Tonightly Show With Tom Ballard
Neo-Conservative Douglas Murray
discusses the effects of immigration in Europe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MEQ2v-8CQE
Terry Gain says
” In normative Islam, women are inferior to men, Islam is superior to all other faiths, murdering gays and apostates is prescribed, as is conquest and jihad;”
………….
This statement is unquestionably correct and therefore Islam is more intelligently regarded as a supremacist, totalitarian, political conquest ideology than as a religion.
Barb says
Scotland needs to line itself up with the UK Government! Great that atlast the British Government is standing up for TRUTH!
In their Definition of Islamophobia they need to state Islam is a Political Ideology with a vaneer of Religion!
According to the Sri Lanka jihadists it is a sin to live in and integrate in non-Muslim countries so withdraw the Citizenship of all Muslim – as it has been proven that voter fraud amongst Muslims has been documented – by withdrawing their citizenship they will have no voting rights!
Nemeth says
Labour wanted to make “Islamophobia” an aggravated crime and promised to do so in 2015. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/11570745/The-price-that-Ed-Miliband-is-prepared-to-pay-to-win-the-Muslim-vote.html
Barb says
I am confident that if Muslim Citizenship were revoked by the Tory Government – Labor’s vote would plummet and the Tory Party would be re-elected!
shea says
good
Linda M Clark says
Has anyone heard about Mr. Spencer’s status? Is he ok?
gravenimage says
I’ve heard he is recovering. I hope so.
gravenimage says
UK U-Turn: Government rejects working definition of “Islamophobia” because it would “restrict legitimate criticism of islam”
……………….
Welcome flickers of common sense…