• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Germany: Authorities classify incidents of Islamic Jew-hatred as “far-right antisemitism”

Jun 22, 2019 3:00 pm By Robert Spencer

Top priority of the political and media elites seems to be to do everything they can to make sure no one thinks ill of Islam, and to push the chimera of a “far-right” threat.

“Germany is accused of downplaying antisemitic attacks by Muslims,” by Cnaan Liphshiz, JTA, June 15, 2019:

The annual al-Quds Day march in Berlin is often cited as a prime example of the rise of so-called new antisemitism in Europe: hatred of Jews in connection with Israel, often by people from Muslim societies.

Despite attempts by organizers in recent years to suppress some expressions of antisemitism, the march by hundreds of participants features frequent calls about killing Israelis, Zionist conspiracies and chants of “free Palestine from the river to the sea.” Flags of terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah are on display, and imams regularly preach anti-Semitic verses from the Quran to the crowd in Farsi and Arabic.

“Under the guise of ‘Israel criticism,’ they use classic anti-Semitic stereotypes, identifying Israel as having ‘Jewish characteristics’: ‘domineering,’ ‘greedy’ or a ‘child killer,’” sociologist Imke Kummer observed about the marchers.

(Iran launched al-Quds Day in 1979 to express support for the Palestinians and oppose Zionism and Israel, and international events of support have followed. Al-Quds is the Arabic name for Jerusalem.)

Such agitation is seen worldwide. To many, it’s especially troubling on streets where the persecution of Jews by the Nazis and their collaborators was so brutal that it moved whole societies in Europe to vow “Never again.”

Curiously, however, some of the incidents documented at the Quds Day march in Berlin have been classified by authorities as forms of far-right antisemitism, independent watchdog groups have discovered….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Germany, Islamic antisemitism, Useful idiots Tagged With: Al-Quds Day, Berlin


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. RichardL says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 3:27 pm

    That is VERY old news. The German government has been doing that for years. Germany is heading for a dictatorship. In Berlin, police are not allowed to engage hard left antifa thugs, before asking the police commissioner. Antifa is getting tax payer money and they attack conservatives, torch cars and squat. The Reichsbuerger are accused of being far right and when they they storm the homes of the these people they find one (!) BB gun and accuse them of planning an “insurrection”.

    • Nicu says

      Jun 23, 2019 at 8:40 am

      East Germans say : we did not go on the streets to live in worst GDR 2.0 – and Merkel’s Africa ! there are only Muzzies and nazis in Germany according to them . Green Party are the saints ! 🙁 gawd I wish I could get out of here .

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 23, 2019 at 9:01 pm

        Nicu, do you know other German patriots?

  2. Angemon says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 3:29 pm

    Jews in Germany – minority, therefore, according to intersectional theory, oppressed.
    Muslims – minority, therefore, according to intersectional theory, oppressed.

    Now one minority is oppressing the other. The intersectional mindset can not compute, therefore ignores/hides it. After all, the Party is always right – meanwhile, incidents like this or the muslims against LGBT in Britain may very well be eye openers to some people…

    • Angemon says

      Jun 22, 2019 at 3:38 pm

      Also, on a more pragmatic level, I’d imagine that, despite all the alarmist rethoric regarding the “rise of the extreme far-right nationalist nazis” authorities have little, if any, anti-semitic incidents recorded – they need something to show or else the narrative falls apart…

    • Rufolino says

      Jun 23, 2019 at 4:23 am

      It’s only a question of when ? Islam seriously turns its attention to the LGBT people of Britain.

      Sporadic attacks against gay people have already occured. Last year a Moslem gang threw acid in the faces of boys leaving a gay club in Dalston, disfiguring them for life.

      As Islam grows in social power, which it is currently doing, attacks will probably become more frequent. Islam aims to kill off gay people. It won’t be so long before gay people start to think twice before meeting in a vulnerable public place.

      There is no doubt Islam will do all it can to make homosexuality socially unacceptable and dangerous.

  3. James says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 3:52 pm

    It is hard to understand what Merkel and the CDU want. They are the traditional conservative party, so they should be against mass immigration by Muslims. But the same holds for the Papacy. The Pope traditionally defended Christianity, now it is throwing Christianity to the dogs to support Islam. In America the Democrats support Islamization, presumably the reason is to defeat Christianity and Judaism and the conservative movement. Perhaps it is just appeasement and the desire to believe that the Muslims would assimilate and support a secular state. but this is not consistent with the history of political Islam.

    • kateafloatgmailcom says

      Jun 23, 2019 at 12:06 pm

      I agree. Seems to me socialists will use Islam to defeat Christianity, Judaism and the conservative movement and establish a socialist/communist NWO. At least those are the long term goals of the Fabian Society and they are behind EU/UN Agenda 2030 etc. US Cloward-Piven strategy also designed to achieve complete control of citizens through Socialism/Communism. Presumably, they are inciting a war to cull the unsustainable population – and because wars make them money. The bit I don’t understand is how the elite think they will get to keep their heads in a muslim dominated world – or do they finish off the war with a bomb again? Too many people are still sleepwalking.

  4. Sun says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 4:05 pm

    Another “far-right” incident happened in Hamburg.

    The attacker was released after two hours.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/rabbi-and-jewish-leader-spit-on-outside-hamburg-city-hall/

  5. Wellington says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 5:14 pm

    Well, in a way this is unintentionally accurate because Islam, as with Nazism, is very much Far-Right. Master faith v. master race and all that rubbish.

    And yes, I know that a portion of the muddled belief system that was Nazism had a leftist component to it, but after the Night of the Long Knives (June 30th, 1934) this “element” in Nazism was eliminated and henceforth Nazism was a pure Far-Right phenomenon, which included many German businessmen making huge profits which Far Leftists like Stalin and Mao did not remotely allow.

    So, please no more nonsense about how Hitler was on the Far Left. No, he was not. Might as well argue that Hitler, because he was baptized a Roman Catholic, was therefore a Christian.

    • Robert Klimek says

      Jun 22, 2019 at 9:05 pm

      Wrong. Utopias can operate only by the exertions of utopian beings. The non-utopian beings must be identified, isolated, and purged from the perfect society, or else the perfect society collapses. These impurities, then, must be eliminated. The Nazis call these impurities non-aryans. The Communists call them counter-revolutionaries. The Islamic cults calls them kaffirs. Master race or master religion ideas come from this doctrine of purification of society. And purification of society to achieve collectivist utopia is far left thinking all the way. In contrast, far right thinking would be beyond libertarianism–namely, anarchy (no government at all)–every man for himself. The Nazis were/are far left. The Communists were/are far left. The Islamic cultists were/are far left. None of these ideologies allow a live and let live attitude. One must physically submit, and must mentally conform to the will of the collective, or die a miserable death. The semantical confusion of right and left in Europe (and elsewhere), as evidenced in this article, is the result of deliberate manipulation–it is the use of language as a weapon by the left to blind its eternal enemy–the free man–in order to set him up for permanent enslavement and domination. Leftist war against civilization is total war. Anything and everything is bent into a weapon to increase the power of the collective and to squeeze out its societal mpurities. Language, in particular, is not used for the purpose of seeking truth and clarifying ideas. Instead, it is used to muddy up every issue in order to advance the strangulation of free thought, in service of totalitarian rule.

      • Wellington says

        Jun 22, 2019 at 11:09 pm

        No, you are wrong. So-called purification of society (your term) can be either Far Left or Far Right. Also, you did not address my point that many German businessmen made huge profits under Hitler after the leftist element in Nazism was driven out post-June 1934. Since when does the Far Left ever allow for businessmen making private profits? You conveniently did not address this.

        You need to re-read matters and re-consider matters. Big time.

        • Heidi says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 2:20 am

          Wellington, not only German businessmen made hugh profits under Hitler, others did too https://www.globalresearch.ca/secret-history-the-u-s-supported-and-inspired-the-nazis/5439236

        • Steve says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 9:56 am

          Please what part of National SOCIALIST Party did you miss? Edify yourself and look up the Original German Language definition of NAZI. Robert is correct.

        • Wellington says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 11:34 am

          Steve: I could ask you what part of NATIONAL socialist did you miss? Those on the Left decry nationalism. Marx certainly did and thought that nation states were just one more way to oppress the “workers of the world.” Look at Leftists today and their disregard of the nation state—and this would include socialists en masse. Those on the Left get all gooey about a world government.

          The fact of the matter is that Nazism was so muddled (just look at its 1920 25 point program) that it incorporated both left-wing and right-wing elements but after the Night of the Long Knives, June 30th 1934, people who were on the left in the Nazi movement, someone like Ernst Rohm, were eliminated and henceforth Nazism, except in high theory land, was a pure right-wing phenomenon. It’s stunning that more people who opine about this get matters so terribly wrong—as you did.

        • kateafloatgmailcom says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 12:23 pm

          Wellington you are wrong. Look up horseshoe theory and degrees of freedom. Schools and MSM don’t tell us this because they are indoctrinating us. Google the Fabian Society behind the EU and UN which has been working towards a collectivist NWO for over a hundred years and achieving it. The end goal of communism and national socialism is an authoritarian dictatorship. Nationalism is really just a question of scale. The Leftists want it on a global scale or in an EU superstate but it is still a dictatorship where the rich ALWAYS get richer and the rest of us are enslaved. That’s why the elite like socialism so much and over 100 million people have died because of it.

        • Robert Klimek says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 1:54 pm

          Your conceptual mistake is using utopian leftist definitions of left and right. In particular, you seem to be fixated on ownership of the means of production as the main, or at least, the defining difference between left and right. Ownership of the means of production by the collective is the economic model that the left requires for its utopia. But leftists realize that to get there, they have to go through historical economic stages that are not perfect. You say that Hitler permitted businessmen to own businesses. Therefore, he was right wing (!). Your logic is that if the society does not currently follow the abstract leftist utopian economic model fully, then it is not leftist—it is right-wing! That conclusion is utterly ridiculous. Even Lenin himself launched his New Economic Policy (permitting limited private ownership) when his Communist economic structure was collapsing in the 1920s. So, by your logic, Lenin was right wing! The Chinese Communists today permit businessmen to own and run companies, as long as they parrot the Party line and help the Communist state keep the population in thrall. So, by your logic, the Chinese today rare right wing! Your narrow, technocratic economic distinction is hardly useful analytically considering the dynamics of real social systems.

          And it leads you to false conclusions. You say that Hitler’s guys crushed Ernst Rolm and his guys, so therefore Hitler was right-wing. By your logic, if one left-wing gang fights another more fanatical left-wing gang, the side that wins must be right wing. By your logic, if the Communist Vietnamese were to fight the Communist Chinese (they’ve had wars before), and the Vietnamese lost, this would prove that the Chinese are capitalist right-wingers! If the Shiites were to fight the Sunnis (they do this all the time), and the Sunnis were to win, this would prove that the Sunnis must be Christian right-wingers! In the past, Hitler (temporarily) allied with Stalin because they were birds of a feather–on the left. Today, the leftist socialists in America and Europe are allied with the Islamic cult—because they are birds of a feather—totalitarians on the collectivist left.

          In truth (as I’ve tried to explain to you), the main distinction between left and right has to do with utopias. A person on the right does not believe in utopias. Human nature is what it is—full of flaws and failings–and cannot be altered to fit required utopian stereotypes no matter how much indoctrination and intimidation is applied. A person on the right does not care what others think and do, as long as they leave him and his family and friends alone and leave him free to think for himself, to express his thoughts freely, to associate with whom he wishes, and to do as he sees fit to advance his own self-interest. In contrast, a person on the left is obsessed with what others think and do (and what they own), and demands that their thoughts and every action and every utterance be brought into conformance with the ideology of the collective. Unacceptable actions must be outlawed. Impure thoughts must be stamped out. This obsession of the left is where the leftist imperative to purify society comes from. Only the left cares about purifying things. The most ambitious of them –the Nazis, the Communists, and Islam–do it by mass-murder of the wrong thinkers.

        • Wellington says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 3:26 pm

          Robert Klimek: Well, we have much to disagree about. Ah, where to begin. Let’s see here. Yes, Lenin adopted the NEP because his left-wing nonsense was so destructive that it left him with no choice and so, temporarily, he implemented private property aspects which leftism detests. This did not make him right-wing but it did make him a borrower of a right-wing aspect.

          And your contention that those on the right will leave others alone is utter nonsense. Did Franco leave others alone? Did Pinochet? Did Mussolini? (And yes, I know Benito was originally a socialist and left-winger but he eventually did “a 180.”).

          Respecting those who run China today, it is a farce that they continue to call themselves Communists while allowing the growth of a huge middle class and the allowance of some to accumulate extraordinary profits. What do you think Marx and Engels would think of this?

          Frankly, you get so much wrong that I don’t know it’s worth bothering trying to correct you of your many errors. Here’s yet one more of your errors from your 9:05 P.M. post of yesterday, to wit, that anarchy is evidence of the extreme right-wing. No, it is evidence of the extreme left-wing. Doubt me? Well then, as an example, why didn’t anarchists in the Spanish Civil War fight on Franco’s side, which they surely did not.

          Enough for now. Your turn if you care.

        • gravenimage says

          Jun 23, 2019 at 9:05 pm

          Yes, Fascism is far right, as Communism is far left.

          To acknowledge his is not, of course, a condemnation of civilized Conservatism.

        • Wellington says

          Jun 24, 2019 at 12:10 pm

          kateafloatgmailcom: Your statement that “The Leftists want it (nationalism) on a global scale…” is an oxymoron. Reconsider.

          Moreover, and as gravenimage noted in her 9:07 P.M. post from yesterday, both the Far Left and Far Right are totalitarian and thus destroy freedom. They have much in common but the Far Right very much tends to protect property rights and at least engages in a kind of crony capitalism as opposed to the complete idiocy of full-scale leftism which utterly destroys economies and which helps explain why when a Far Right regime comes to an end and at least some democracy and freedom are restored (hopefully both fully), the nation in question makes a faster recovery than does a Far Left polity that has come to an end because as bad as the Far Right is, and it’s awful, the Far Left respecting the economic sphere is even worse.

        • Robert Klimek says

          Jun 24, 2019 at 1:50 pm

          Wellington. I am no scholar of the Spanish Civil War or who the various players were. So I will take your assertions about what the anarchists did in that war as given. You seem to be asking why anarchists, who logically would want no central authority at all, would join in with leftists, who seek totalitarian rule by an all-powerful central authority.

          Once again, to understand things, one has to focus on the concept of utopia and the left’s obsessive quest to achieve it. The left consistently follows a straightforward method of operation (MO) for achieving utopia. Step 1: Tear down the current system; that is, sabotage all its institutions from within and—externally–create discontent, chaos, and violence to overwhelm and collapse them. Step 2: Build a utopia on the pulverized political rubble of the old system (Leftists always exhibit two massive conceits: first, that they know what a societal utopia is, and second, that they alone know how to build a proper one). In Step 2, typically the leftists seek to create new totalitarian institutions that control every aspect of society, including everything from its overall direction and collective goals down to the daily behavior of individuals in every situation. While these two steps of utopia-building can overlap, mostly (and very conveniently) the leftists seem to spend most of their time on step 1. In this demolition derby, they have a tremendous advantage over the powers that be, because tearing down institutions takes a tiny fraction of the energy and commitment—that had been sustained over centuries of typically painful trial and error—that it took to build them in the first place.

          And so–back to your question about the anarchists–it is entirely understandable to me that the anarchists of the Spanish Civil War, who (ideologically) would have been seeking the elimination of all central authority entirely, would join with leftists enthusiastically in their Step 1 demolition mayhem against the current regime. And I would expect that once the leftists got control (they didn’t, historically) and proceeded to Step 2, the anarchists would have turned against the left and would have begun wrecking the budding institutions of the new leftist utopia. The anarchists would naturally have the energy advantage here, so the left would be inclined to exterminate these “useful idiots” who helped them to power, a societal purification the leftists would have launched with great, self-righteous vigor. During the ensuing bloodletting, given no third-party interventions, whichever group was the most ruthless would then prevail.

      • Karl Meyer says

        Jun 23, 2019 at 1:03 pm

        Islam can neither be left wing or right wing…it’s a religion founded centuries before the political terms were invented in the French Revolution.

        • Robert Klimek says

          Jun 24, 2019 at 2:57 pm

          Karl Meyer. Islam is not a religion. It is a totalitarian political cult that carries the trappings of religion to fool its victims. It is a political cult because its ultimate goal and primary purpose is political, and all its important doctrines are political. The goal is Muslim rule of every human being on the planet, without exception. Now, who rules over whom is a political question, not a religious question. And who rules what patch of land on Earth is a political question, not a religious question. But Islam is obsessed with these things.

          Islam’s political method of operation (MO) is the MO of the left. Like the left, Islam seeks a utopian goal–Islam defines utopia as Muslim rule over the whole planet under Islamic sharia law–every man, woman, and child, without exception. The top political ruler is the caliph. No non-Muslim is permitted to hold any power over any Muslim, at any level of society or government, or in any place on the Earth. Like the left, Islam is collectivist. The Islamic collective is called the Ummah. Muslims sole loyalty is to the Ummah,with its caliph, and to no other entity on Earth, except for purposes of deception. Like the left, Islam demands totalitarian control by central authority over all aspects of society, from the direction of society as a whole, down to control of individual behaviors. Muslims are permitted no personal identity, except their identify as obedient drones in the Ummah, carrying out the “will of Allah” as copiously documented in an endless list of draconian rules for personal behavior, including provision for “martyrdom” attacks against “infidels,” And, once again, the political conquest of the Earth is the end goal of all this struggle A Muslim’s sole purpose in life is to make the Ummah bigger and stronger–he is to dedicate every waking moment to that quest, or be outed as a shirker. Like the left, Islam conducts purges and wars of purification (jihad) to exterminate wrong-thinkers, and to wreck all societies outside of Islam in order to prepare them for conquest and domination. Islam defines the areas of the world under Islamic rule as the Domain of Islam. It defines the areas not yet subjugated as the Domain of War.

          War of subjugation against civilizations built by “the other” is the purpose of Islam, and war is the ultimate form of political action. There is much more that could be said about Islam’s fundamental political nature, but that is the gist of it.

    • Joe says

      Jun 23, 2019 at 7:15 am

      That is the problem with the left/right diagram. It is hard to label without a definition. One might say that communism is on the left and fascism is on the right. In practice, though, the rule of Stalin wasn’t much different than that of Mussolini. An Islamic dictator would be right at home oppressing some communist country. Do people have rights? Or is the state more important than the subjects? The degree of freedom is a better way to measure.

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 23, 2019 at 9:07 pm

        When you go far enough to the right or left, they are both totalitarian, so there is little practical difference.

      • Robert Klimek says

        Jun 24, 2019 at 4:08 pm

        Joe. Definitions are everything, and the same terms can mean different things in different contexts. That’s why good lawyers, mathematicians, and engineers always are careful to state their “terms of reference” before writing any contract or treatise on a subject.

        A lot of discussion on this thread is people talking past each other because they are using different definitions of left and right. My definition–that is, my “terms of reference”–stems from the ideas of the American Revolution (not the French Revolution, say, as someone above suggested to be the gold standard for defining left and right) .

        In my conception, the basic distinction comes from the size and scope of central government. Over time, the left wants the central government to expand its functions ever bigger so it can guide society toward Utopian goals like “social justice.” The “smart ones” of society, god-like oracles, ensconced in the central government, must make decisions for everyone else, or else society will become unfair. The right says the society evolves on its own, under its own dynamic, and sets its own direction. It needs no interference or “guidance from on high” by self-appointed wise men in the government. No one has the wisdom to design societies. Men are not gods. And, excepting only in Utopia, life is not fair.

        So basically, the left wants big central government, and the right wants small central government.

        The farther left you go, the bigger and the more powerful the central government is, and bigger the scope of its activities. The farther right you go, the smaller and the more restricted the central government is, and the smaller the scope if its activities. Way out on the far left is totalitarianism, where the government controls every aspect of society and runs peoples’ daily lives in every detail. On the far right is anarchy, where there is no central government (or any government). On the far left is Orwell’s 1984, on the far right is Mad Max.

        One of the big lies of the left is that the Nazis were right-wingers, so that anyone on the right of the political spectrum, including conservatives, are actual or budding Nazis–thus, they are evil like Hitler! Leftist trashing of semantics is just one way that leftists use language as a weapon to attack the right. (To a leftist, everything is a weapon–the ends justify the means). Conservatives, of course, are on the right. Conservatives say that the central government should only minimally interfere with people’s daily lives and it should be restricted to a few explicitly delineated essential functions, like national defense. The only people who actually behave like Nazis in practice today are the relentless power-expanding leftists in Europe and the U.S.–that is because Nazis were socialists on the far left. Only the left can be totalitarian.

  6. gravenimage says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 6:11 pm

    Germany: Authorities classify incidents of Islamic Jew-hatred as “far-right antisemitism”
    …………………..

    Ah…right. Nothing to do with Islam, you filthy Infidels…

    • Lydia Church says

      Jun 22, 2019 at 9:10 pm

      But another excuse to sling mud at ‘far right extremists,’ even though it had nothing at all to do with the right in any way…

      • gravenimage says

        Jun 23, 2019 at 9:08 pm

        Yep.

  7. gravenimage says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 7:37 pm

    test

  8. Mr. Cohen says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 10:58 pm

    Mr. Steven Emerson said:

    “BDS — which seeks to isolate Israel economically
    and culturally — is considered anti-Semitic because
    it singles out the world’s only Jewish state and
    ignores countries with far worse human rights records.”

    SOURCE: CAIR Anti-Semites Fight
    ‘Anti-Semitism Awareness’ Bill

    http://www.algemeiner.com/2019/04/08/cair-antisemites-fight-anti-semitism-awareness-bill/

    ===================================
    Mr. Eitan Fischberger (from camera dot org) said:

    …the word “apartheid” has become associated
    with Israel, despite Israeli Arabs, Druze
    and Ethiopians serving in the highest
    echelons of the Israeli government,
    parliament and judiciary.

    Sure, racism and discrimination are
    endemic to every society, and always
    will be, but labeling Israel an
    apartheid state is woefully inaccurate.

    Then there is the oft-heard contention
    that Israel is committing a Palestinian
    “genocide,” even though the Palestinian
    population in Judea, Samaria and the
    Gaza Strip continues to grow at a rapid pace.
    …..
    A prime example of this trend is the redefinition
    of the word “refugee,” whereby every refugee in
    the world sheds this status once they resettle
    in another country, and their descendants
    do not receive refugee status either.

    Only Palestinians are considered refugees
    even after resettling, and their descendants
    inherit this status indefinitely.

    SOURCE: Postmodernism and Israel:
    Fluidity of words has real-world implications

    by Eitan Fischberger, 2019 June 21
    http://www.jns.org/opinion/postmodernism-and-israel-fluidity-of-words-has-real-world-implications/

  9. Oren Wysocki says

    Jun 22, 2019 at 11:26 pm

    Merkel, A supporter of the two state ‘solution’ to arab muslim aggression, and false claims of entitlement. In G-d I trust.

  10. Steve Meikle says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 1:41 am

    Why are they such Muslim fanciers? Do they hate themselves so much that the grass, being greener, means that non Europeans must be good by definition? As for German self hate I have met Germans of the older generation, my age and older, feel guilt for a war that ended before they were born. This is totally irrational but immovable as far as they are concerenedx – t

    Or are the elites afraid of them and are desperately trying to appease them?

    Or do they hate the West so much that they are determined to sabotage it as part of a globalist plot – I doubt it but it is a possibility

  11. Phillip Rosslee says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 3:28 am

    Most of our politicians on the left are either Communists Cultural Marxists or Pro Islamic and I make it a policy to never trust one of them unless they have a history in the social media of supporting Judaeo – Christian values and Angela Merkel is neither and nothing but an old style Communist from the Soviet era.

  12. Jehuda Ewert says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 6:00 am

    Angela Merkel prepared the association German guilt-holocaust-jews-migrant disaster in following clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_8kc19DL70&t=3s
    So the prepared disaster is of course not her responsibility, she only imported the most antisemitic people (as a byproduct of the migrant business, people leaving their place free to buy for German realestate moguls by paying money for human trafficking) because “it’s the jews fault”.Any laymen knows the meaning of freudian lapsus, committed in the following link (Merkel declaring antisemitism as civil obligation)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PzWlz2y-ao
    Of course playing dum is a good excuse.

  13. jewdog says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 7:07 am

    In a sense, the classification is correct, given the fascist nature of Islamo-fascism! But that’s not what the deceitful German authorities mean. The German government, in tolerating the political wing of Hezbollah, shows its real intentions, and hypocrisy. At least AfD opposes the Hezbollah insanity, but they are only a ten percent party.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 23, 2019 at 9:12 pm

      Yes–this is obfuscation.

  14. Princess says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 7:35 am

    If by calling events like the Al-Quds day far-right anti-semitism will move the authorities to finally put a lid on the problem, then by all means call it far-right anti-semitism. I don’t care what they call it, just take care of it, but it doesn’t look like it will be taken care of, at least not in the foreseeable near future.

    • gravenimage says

      Jun 23, 2019 at 9:13 pm

      I don’t think this will lead to German authorities doing anything–except for maybe harassing non-antisemitic groups like AfD.

  15. Martin says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 9:01 am

    “Curiously, however, some of the incidents documented at the Quds Day march in Berlin have been classified by authorities as forms of far-right antisemitism, independent watchdog groups have discovered….”

    This article stopped just as it was getting to the salient facts of the matter.

  16. Tom says

    Jun 23, 2019 at 3:11 pm

    The left and globalists are desperately trying to label those who are patriots as “Far Right” in the minds of the general public.

    Little do they realize that the majority of the public are patriotic and will not be fooled by this cheap tactic.

    If any should be labeled it should be the Islamists who’s hatred of Jews and other “Non Believers” is on open display for all to see.

  17. butlermedia says

    Jul 8, 2019 at 6:49 pm

    Germany is incorrect, Jew-haters are far-LEFTISTS, not right. And don’t forget, “nazi” is a German contraction for “National SOCIALIST”! Hitler and Stalin were two peas in a pod, and very much alike.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests
  • John on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Vladimir on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Linda McGuire on UK: Muslim stabs two women in Marks & Spencer, one in the neck, cops search for motive
  • Linda McGuire on UK: Muslim stabs two women in Marks & Spencer, one in the neck, cops search for motive

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.