A harbinger of things to come. Thanks to Angela Merkel, there will soon be many mosque squares, and very many new mosques, in Germany. And that’s great, right? We will all march together into the glorious multicultural future, won’t we? Well, Merkel apparently assumes we will, but there is no doubt that at least some of the Muslims she has welcomed harbor supremacist, authoritarian beliefs that will inevitably cause conflict in Germany in the future. But never mind: the only people calling attention to that eventuality are greasy Islamophobes.
“District center in Germany’s Aachen renamed Mosque Square,” Daily Sabah, June 26, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
The name of the square in Eilendorf district of the western German city of Aachen has been changed to “Moscheeplatz (Mosque Square)” with a ceremony held on Tuesday, with an aim of highlighting the importance of tolerance and unity.
The square is home to the Aachen Yunus Emre Mosque, which operates under the Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DITIB).
Speaking at the renaming ceremony for the 2,100-square-meter center, Turkey’s Consul General in Cologne Ceyhun Erciyes said that by taking this decision, the local authorities showed that the mosque is a beautiful reflection of harmony, integration, tolerance, unity and solidarity.
Erciyes stressed that, in light of the rise in anti-Muslim, anti-migrant hatred that some have incited to divide societies through fear, “We must raise our voices together against those who are fed by fear and hatred, and we must demonstrate our friendship and solidarity as it is here today.”
Speaking at the ceremony, Aachen Mayor Marcel Philipp of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) Party expressed his gratitude to everyone who contributed to the name-change, noting that renaming streets and squares is not an easy process in Germany.
No Muzzies Here says
Just an innocent name? No. It signifies that the area has been turned over to Muslim control. Little by little Muslims are assuming control over significant parts of once-civilized countries.
Most of the people are in total denial. They will face reality one day, unfortunately.
Colleen Sim says
First degree, madness!
Mr. Cohen says
Winston Churchill said this in year 1921 CE:
“Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities,
but the influence of the religion [Islam] paralyses
the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde* force exists in the world.”
* VOCABULARY NOTE:
The word RETROGRADE refers to
an object which moves in the backward
direction or degenerates to a worse condition.
SOURCE 1: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 6, page 53) by Martin Gilbert, year 2007 CE
SOURCE 2: An older source for this quote:
The River War, by Winston Churchill in 1899 CE,
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1592070/posts
CHRONOLOGY:
Winston Churchill was British Prime Minister
from 1940 to 1945 CE and from 1951 to 1955 CE.
Jay says
Mr Cohen Thank you for your educational posts. I have long been a student of world history and WWII, and PM Churchill has been one of my great heros! One thing I know for sure, PM Churchill is not resting easy today, seeing what is happening to England and Europe, with the Muslim invasion and the ongoing destruction it has caused! I praise Poland and Hungary for holding strong and protecting their soverignity.
And as a Catholic, I am appalled by this one world order Nazi pope that suddenly appeared. The USA has
similar problems to deal with as well. Since 9-11, our awareness was certainly heightened! There are over 150 mosques in Florida alone!! Pres Trump is doing a great job fighting against the one world order communist group and the liberals who have no respect for the borders or sovereignty of the USA! 🇺🇸
May God save us from the insanity.
Thanks again for taking the time to post.
Hoppla says
Jay, Churchill was a closet Muslim and his family knew about it. The defeat of Germany opened the flood gates for Islam and communism. Europe is paying dearly for following a egomaniac drunk and war criminal.
Angemon says
“Churchill was a closet Muslim”
Citation needed.
gravenimage says
The vicious Hoppla is full of crap. Churchill’s criticism of Islam is well documented.
CRUSADER says
“Hoppla” is full of hooplah !
What a terrible jokester !
Get a life !
Save Europe says
Absolute nonsense !!!! Plus apart from the fact he was NOT a Muslim, how was he a war criminal? Or are you pro Nazi Germany?!?!
Adrian Thomas says
Hooplah wins todays prize. one ton of hi grade Horse shxt to match his posting .
Mr. Cohen says
Winston Churchill said this in a
parliamentary debate 1921 June 14:
“The Wahabis*, Churchill noted,
“profess a life of exceeding austerity,
and what they practice themselves they
rigorously enforce on others.
They hold it as an article of duty,
as well as of faith, to kill all who do not
share their opinions and make slaves
of their wives and children.
Women have been put to death in Wahabi
villages for simply appearing in the streets.
It is a penal offense to wear a silk garment.
Men have been killed for smoking a cigarette…”
* HISTORY NOTE:
In July 2004, the 9/11 Commission identified
Wahabism as a cause of Islamic Terrorism.
SOURCE: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 7, page 67) by Martin Gilbert, 2007 CE
CHRONOLOGY:
Winston Churchill was British Prime Minister
from 1940 to 1945 CE and from 1951 to 1955 CE.
CRUSADER says
Too bad Churchill couldn’t’ve convinced Western Powers to have cracked further down on Islamic Turkey
by referencing such observances about how strict Islamic tendencies can turn very oppressive….
but the Gallipoli campaign failed miserably, and the notion of the British navy easily sailing into Constantinople port and taking over matters was dynamically dismissed afterward; while Ataturk eventually persuaded everyone that a stronger Turkey was better in order to put Russia in check. The Christian Greeks and Armenians suffered, and we have Erdogan to contend with only a century later…. while millions of Turks have grown in population in Europe….
gravenimage says
Good posts, Mr. Cohan and CRUSADER.
GreekEmpress says
+1
Truly!
CRUSADER says
Yassou!
CRUSADER says
Greek gunboat near Izmir bears Byzantine flag
CRUSADER says
Liberating Greece vs Aggrandizing Turkey — one century ago:
After First World War, Prime Minister Venizelos lobbied hard at the 1918 Paris peace conference, urgently presenting his views for an expanded Hellas, especially to include the large Greek communities in Northern Epirus, Thrace and Minor Asia, and even more compelling was the real need to protect the Greeks who were subjected to harsh treatment by Neoturks, during World War I.
This conflicted with colonial designs of Italy to take possession of a large part of southwestern Anatolia, which has been confirmed by the allies in two separate formal treaties in 1915 and 1917 and they landed troops in Antalya marching them toward Smyrna. An alarmed Venizelos appealed to Lloyd George.
The British Prime Minister favored the occupation of the Smyrna area by Greek forces to protect the large Greek population there. On May 15, 1919 the Greek army landed peacefully on Asia Minor, for the first time since Byzantine times 500 years earlier.
Venizelos appointed Stergiades as governor of Smyrne, and he kept the order in the city of Smyrne, treating Musulmans and Christians in a fair way. Meantime the Turkish irregular forcse (tsetes) harassed the Greek army and pillaged Greek cities. In June, 20 they massacred 2500 civilians in the city of Aidinion. July 29, Leonidas Paraskeuopoulos became general of the Army and arrived in Smyrne to assume his duties.
The events also awakened a new sense of patriotism in a Turkish population depressed by decades of national weakening. At this time a new personality had emerged, that of General Mustafa “Ataturk” Kemal.
General Kemal formalized his movement into a national congress in February 1920 into a declaration of independence from the government in Constantinople. He established the new capital in the center of the country at Ankara and vowed never to allow Turkey to be partitioned or controlled by the various European interests.
During one year, nothing changed in Minor Asia. This delay of the allies to arrange the peace terms with Turkey following the end of World War I was disastrous for Greece.
Not only did the Kemalist government become stronger, but the allies foresaw a prolonged and costly new war in Asia Minor. By mid-June 1920 a Turkish nationalist attack on the British position near Nicomedia at the eastern end of the sea of Marmara gave Greece the chance to demonstrate her military effectiveness. The troops advanced east from the agreed-upon holding line, and occupied an area from Prussa to Philadelfeia and Panormos. Philadelfeia was the last Greek city that was occupied by Turks in 14th century.
Then the Greek army also liberated Eastern Thrace – Adrianople, Alexandroupolis, Raedestos, Heraclea – and came closer to the old capital of Medieval Hellenism — Constantinople — which allied forces insisted to remain under Turkish possession. Colonel Tzafer Tayiar was captured as prisoner. In this optimistic atmosphere the treaty of Sevres was finally signed on August 10, 1920. According to the treaty, Hellas possesed Eastern Thrace and Smyrne while Armenia, Syria, Palestine became independent states, Kurdistan became autonomous, and Cyprus was a British colony.
After King Alexander died leaving no heirs, the general elections scheduled to be held on November 1, 1920 suddenly became the focus of a new conflict between the supporters of Venizelos and those of King Constantine. The war-weary Greek people opted for change. To the surprise of many, Venizelos won only 118 out of the total 369 seats. The crushing defeat obliged Venizelos and a number of his closest supporters to leave the country. Those elections were a terrible mistake that Venizelos made, because at that time he was the only capable politician to handle the difficult situation.
The new government prepared for a plebiscite on the return of King Constantine. Remembering his pro-German posture during the war, the allies warned the Greek government that if he should be returned to the throne they would cut off all aid to Greece. The French and the Italians took the opportunity to conclude private agreements with the Kemalists in recognition of their mounting strength. Lenin also supported Kemal with money and ammunition. Also the new government, under Gounares, replaced all the veteran officers and the leadership of the army was given to Anastasios Papoulas.
Kemal did not accept the Sevres Treaty and continued the war. So the only option for Greeks was to force Turks to accept the Sevres agreement in the battlefield. Earlier in December, 1920 the Greeks had advanced to Eski Shehir. Finding stiff resistance they retired to their former positions. In March 1921 the advance was more in earnest, but so was the defense by the entrenched Turkish Nationalists, who were better prepared and equipped like a regular army.
Not willing to go backwards, the Greek government decided to go forward against Kemal and Ankara. King Constantine arrived in Smyrna in early June 1921. The Greek army again advanced on 1st July Anamorion (Afyon Karahisar), on 4th July Koutaheia, on 6th July Doruleaon (Eski Shehir). The principal objective was Ankara and the Greeks convinced themselves that if they could capture this nationalist capital, they would destroy the Turkish resistance and victory would be theirs. On August 14, 1921, the Greek assault began. In an all-out effort they managed to reach the Sakaraya River and the city of Gordion where Greater Alexander had cut the “Gordion Desmus”, about 40 miles from Ankara. The casualties on both sides were enormous, but Greeks managed to win also the battle of Cale-Groto.
….and now, thereby came the rest of the story….
james says
My impression is that Frau Merkel gets her ideas about Islam from Obama and his friends in CAIR or other Muslim lobbying organizations. Probably as a politician she is not interested in knowing what Islamic doctrines are or what the goals of groups like CAIR are. she has probably the intellectual level of journalists who do look at superficialities in order to get good stories. These mosque squares sound like a symptom of the success of stealth Jihad. Should we expect reciprocation from the Islamic world? Turkey will not finance the building of churches or rename any squares Church Square. Neither will the other Muslim majority countries. The tolerance is all one-dimensional. Christian society showing its tolerance toward Islam, with no reciprocity to be expected, and even less for Jews and Judaism. It is a bit ironic that the head of Germany should take the path of appeasement, since this path did not work when Europe tried to appease Germany in the 30s. Why should it work with Islam, which has a 1400 year history of jihad and imposing Islam through stealth, law, persuasion and war. .
Mr. Cohen says
In the year 1922 CE Winston Churchill said this:
“Left to themselves, the Arabs of Palestine would not
in a thousand years have taken effective steps towards
the irrigation and electrification of Palestine.
They would have been quite content to dwell, a handful
of philosophic people, in the wasted sun-scorched plains,
letting the waters of the Jordan [River] continue to flow
unbridled and unharnessed into the Dead Sea.”
SOURCE: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 7, page 81) by Martin Gilbert, year 2007 CE
CHRONOLOGY:
Winston Churchill was British Prime Minister
from 1940 to 1945 CE and from 1951 to 1955 CE.
____________________________________________
Winston Churchill said this in year 1922 CE:
“The Arabs would have sat in the dark forever
had not the Zionist engineers harnessed the
Jordan River for electrification.
Now they swarm into Palestine in seeking the light.”
SOURCE: A Peace to End All Peace
CHRONOLOGY:
Winston Churchill was British Prime Minister
from 1940 to 1945 CE and from 1951 to 1955 CE.
QUESTION: If the Arabs are native to Palestine,
then why did Winston Churchill say this about them:
“Now they swarm INTO Palestine in seeking the light.”
The word “INTO” implies that most of them
were NOT in Palestine before the Zionists.
Mr. Cohen says
Winston Churchill said this in 1937 CE:
“[Winston] Churchill did not accept that the Jews
were a foreign race [to the Holy Land]. He said it was
the Arabs who had been the outsiders, the conquerors.”
SOURCE: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 10, page 115) by Martin Gilbert, year 2007 CE
CHRONOLOGY:
Winston Churchill was British Prime Minister
from 1940 to 1945 CE and from 1951 to 1955 CE.
HISTORY NOTE:
According to the Wikipedia internet encyclopedia,
these lands were conquered by the Rashidun Caliphs,
from year 632 to year 661 of the Common Era
(from west to East): Libya, Egypt, Israel, Lebanon,
Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Eastern Turkey, and Iran.
Therefore, Winston Churchill was correct when
he said that the Muslims were the outsiders
and conquerors, with respect to the land of Israel.
CogitoErgoSum says
So … when do Christians get the Hagia Sophia back?
CRUSADER says
Watch “THE PROMISE” and see how the Turks made it difficult to do so:
gravenimage says
Yes–quite a good movie, considering current Islamophilic standards.
Rick says
We should demand Hagia Sophia back. To hell with Erdoyan and Muslims.
CRUSADER says
Nearly had it! Constantinople was overrun by the Greeks in the 1920s but their support from the West fell through and the Turks avenged this with atrocities and kicked out the Greeks…. Imagine how different a diminished Turkey would be, and a strengthened more glorified Greece!
GreekEmpress says
Another +1!
CRUSADER says
Byzantine Roman Empire’s Flag imagery to music:
somehistory says
When merkle met the president…she was standing there, shaking all over. The camera zoomed in on her arms and hands and she could have been ill with Parkinson’s disease, she was shaking so much.
More people are going to be shaking soon…out of “fear and expectation of what is coming” so said Jesus Christ, when He spoke of the “anguish of nations, not knowing the way out,”
“Because of the roaring of the sea (of humanity) and its agitation.”
All non moslim Germans may as well move out of the area. It has been taken…freely given over…to the slaves of islam.
CRUSADER says
Odd how German dictators seem to become shakily afflicted by Parkinsons….
melek-ric says
“…noting that renaming streets and squares is not an easy process in Germany.”
I dunno…in May 1945 all those street signs reading ‘Adolf Hitler Strasse’ and ‘Hermann Goering Platz’ sure came down in a hurry…
gravenimage says
+1
Mr. Cohen says
Winston Churchill said [in year 1955 CE]:
“You ought to let the Jews have Jerusalem;
it is they who made it famous.”
SOURCE: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 26, page 292) by Martin Gilbert, year 2007 CE
CHRONOLOGY:
Winston Churchill was British Prime Minister
from 1940 to 1945 CE and from 1951 to 1955 CE.
jarmanray says
Has Merkel forgotten that Aachen was the home of Charlemagne and that his throne is still there? This is one of the most foul deeds yet from this traitor. I suppose that the Auerbachs Keller in Leipzig where Goethe wrote “Foust” will become a foul shawarma house serving halal rather than the fantastic rippchen und sauer kraut with a glass or two of a Mosel/Ur auslessen.
gravenimage says
I was just going to mention this, jarmanray–Charlemagne established the seeds of what we today think of as Europe–before this, Rome and its surviving fragments had largely looked to the shores of the Mediterranean–this was no longer possible after Islam had conquered the Levant and North Africa.
Charlemagne also launched the first successful defense against Islam in Europe, preventing it from spreading to France from its stronghold in Iberia.
That these fools have no understanding of this brave history and are proud of just throwing it away is sickening.
Joe says
At least we have photos of the stain glass in the Church. It will probably burn down, and the cause of the fire will never be known (or at least the real cause will never be known).
Kay says
Is the mosque funded by Turkey?
gravenimage says
Most of the Mosques in Germany are, Kay–so almost certainly.
Kay says
Very problematic, like foreign outposts within a country.
University funding is also problematic.
somehistory says
Kay
They **are** “foreign outposts”…should be referred to as *forts*…”within”, full of “soldiers.”
Taking over is the goal and places to “prey” are their way of getting past the scrutiny.
gravenimage says
True, Kay and Somehistory.
Mr. Cohen says
Winston Churchill said:
“In Mesopotamia and the Middle East,
the country is arid and the people are ferocious.”
SOURCE: Churchill: A Biography
(chapter 19, page 360) by Roy Jenkins, year 2001
===================================
“In May 1941, a pro-German revolt broke out in Baghdad [Iraq].”
SOURCE: Churchill and America
(page 225) by Martin Gilbert, year 2005 CE
HISTORY NOTE: In 1941, Germany
was ruled by Adolph Hitler and his Nazi Party.
===================================
Speaking of the Arabs [in year 1944 CE,
Winston] Churchill remarked that:
“They [the Arabs] had done very little
[to help fight Nazi Germany], and in some
instances had made things difficult for us.”
SOURCE: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 18, page 205) by Martin Gilbert, year 2007 CE
===================================
[Winston] Churchill had:
“a low opinion of the Arab generally.”
SOURCE: Churchill and the Jews
(chapter 5, page 48) by Martin Gilbert, year 2007 CE
CRUSADER says
The choice of Aachen….
CHARLEMAGNE !!!
The site of Aachen was chosen by Charlemagne after careful consideration in a key moment of his reign. Since his advent as King of the Franks, Charlemagne had led numerous military expeditions that had both filled his treasury and enlarged his realm, most notably towards the East. He conquered pagan Saxony in 772–780, but this area resisted and the war with the Saxons lasted for about thirty years. Charlemagne ended the Germanic custom of an itinerant court moving from place to place and established a real capital. As he was aging, he decreased the frequency of military expeditions and, after 806, virtually did not leave Aachen.
Aachen’s geographic location was a decisive factor in Charlemagne’s choice: the place was situated in the Carolingian heartlands of Austrasia, the cradle of his family, East of the Meuse river, at a crossroads of land roads and on a tributary of the Rur, called the Wurm. From then, Charlemagne left the administration of the Southern regions to his son Louis, named King of Aquitaine, which enabled him to reside in the North.
Carolingian Empire and its capital, Aachen, in the early 9th century.
Besides, settling down in Aachen enabled Charlemagne to control from closer the operations in Saxony. Charlemagne also considered other advantages of the place: surrounded with forest abounding in game, he intended to abandon himself to hunting in the area. The aging emperor could also benefit from Aachen’s hot springs.
The scholars of the Carolingian era presented Charlemagne as the “New Constantine”; in this context, he needed a capital and a palace worthy of the name. He left Rome to the Pope. The rivalry with the Byzantine Empire led Charlemagne to build a magnificent palace.
gravenimage says
Spot on, CRUSADER. And don’t forget about his successful defense against Islam, most salient of all here.
Emel says
I was just going to post, about Germany being the Heart of the Holy Roman Empire and came across your post. The Holy League, which along with Poland (Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), was instrumental in stopping the moslem (don’t use muslim, that’s their word) Turks at Vienna in 1683. The Holy League was made of mostly German states and Austria. So it is quite interesting and more than ironic that the epicenter of this current moslem invasion of Europe is The old Holy League of Germany.
CRUSADER says
Agreed. I replace Byzantium for “ottoman” — with furniture…
….Greek Delight for “turkish delight” — with tasty treats….
….Rome (when/where all roads meet ) for “mecca” –with geographic points…
….and Moslem when using it as an adjective, such as:
“the Moslem atrocity once again illustrates how Islam incites Muslims to anger”
Walter Sieruk says
The renaming of that specific district area in the city of Aachen Germany to “Mosque Square” many have much symbolic meaning. This being the history of the city of Aachen the “Holy Emperor Charlemagne” the who was the head of what was called the Holy Roman Empire. ” In Aachen Charlemagne had his throne and large, huge”Christian chapel Which was a major capital of Christendom .
Therefore this renaming may well have double symbolic meaning
First, this symbolically stands for over-throw of Christianity in Europe and replacing the Christian religion with what Muslim feel is a much better and superior religion, which they believe to be Islam .
As explained by the Christian author, William Wagner,, in his book which is entitled HOW ISLAM PLANS TO CHANGE THE WORLD had explained on page 155 about a meeting that he had with a Muslim cleric , which reads “Several years ago one Imam told me that ,prior to 1990, the greatest enemy to Islam was Communism but now it is the Christian missions.” Further, on page 208 the Wagner had written about some zealous Muslims that “They have failed to stop Christian missions. They see Christian missions as their number one enemy.” On the very next page the reader is informed that “Christianity remains the number one buffer against Islam, a fact readily recognized by those who seek a world wild ummah.”
Second, This also symbolically stands for the governmental take-over o Europe by the powers in Islam and the establishment of Sharia law in the nations of Europe.
This has been further explained and revealed by in the book , by Robert Spencer ,THE HISTORY OF THE JIHAD FROM MUHAMMAD TO ISIS .Which in page 367 informs the reader that “The early twenty- first century saw a sharp rise in jihad massacres perpetrated all over the West by individuals or small groups of Muslims: in London, Manchester, Paris, Toulouse, Nice ,Amsterdam, Madrid, Brussels, Berlin Munich ,Copenhagen…”
Those jihadists /Muslims with their insidious jihad-minded Muslims scheming for the subtle stealth jihad,as in Aachen, and not so subtle, Islamic conquest of Europe by every possible means, including the stealth and violent jihad which is, indeed, awful.
As explained by William Wagner in his book HOW ISLAM PLANS TO CHANGE THE WORLD .Which informs the reader n page 195 “Of all the continents of the world, Europe is probably the number one target by Muslim strategist who are seeking world dominance.”
Therefore, the Europeans would be wise to be on guard.
gravenimage says
Fine post, Walter.
Emel says
Merkel has to be removed and replaced by someone who is anti-open borders, pro-German and this has to be done very soon. As it’s close to the Point of No Return in Germany. And Germany is the key to stopping this insanity. But, just as in America, there are very powerful forces working against us. And their grip on information, via censorship, shadow banning, outright banning is increasing exponentially.
Rufolino says
Shakin’ Merkel has two more years to go before her reign of destruction in Europe is over.
And she’s damn well going to make sure nothing interrupts it, even if she drops dead on the job. It’s the Gotterdammerung complex, all over again.
This terrifying woman has left a mark on Europe as indelible as Hitler’s.
CRUSADER says
Let’s instead keep the World as it has been, and roll back Islam,
and change Muzzies into what Irshad Manji wants ’em to become….
soft and cuddly pluralistic harmless things which are joyful to be around.
gravenimage says
Yunus Emre–whom this Mosque is named for–was a Turkish poet. He wrote paeans to the savage “Prophet” Muhammed. Here is one of his best known poems:
Track him if I get together.
If I put the dust on my face,
If you see your face,
What about Muhammad?
Even if it was a blessed expedition
In the paths of the Kaaba
Once I watch the cemalin dream
What about Muhammad?
Ali and Hasan-Hüseyin at the moment
Love is in the heart, love
Tomorrow on the court of judgment
What about Muhammad?
“Dolphin” refers to your medhin in languages
In languages, languages, both hearts
Search in expatriate provinces
What about Muhammad?
Think of the great poets of Germany and France–then consider this disgusting crap.
CRUSADER says
Thank you for offering this consideration, GravenImage.
I am trying to imagine the grave nature of what Yunus Emre’s pen of magnificent art
has written for posterity to digest….
My guess, is that is sounds better in Arabic….
Certainly reading this has me ask, “What about Muhammad?”
gravenimage says
He *might* sound better in Arabic–it would be hard for him to sound worse.
Generally, i think that poetry, like prose, should translate pretty well save for any rhyming–unless it is a poor translation. This is pretty bad.
CRUSADER says
Well….so…. “what about Muhammad?”
Channel 4 UK Documentary follows historian and author of ‘In the Shadow of the Sword’ Tom Holland in search of the origins of Islam, casting doubt on the likely location of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad’s origins.
Mr. Cohen says
Mr. Ariel Ben Solomon said:
“During the past year-and-a-half, he [Mr. Yigal Carmon]
explained, MEMRI concentrated on monitoring sermons
by imams [Muslim preachers] across America.
The results from a random sample of over 100
imams, he said, were shocking.
The sermons were laced with incitement to kill Jews,
support for global jihad and hard-core misogyny.
A few imams, he said, preached tolerance
and coexistence, but they were a small minority.”
SOURCE: Supremacists and Jihadis form
two-pronged attack threatening Jews in USA
by Ariel Ben Solomon, 2019 June 26
http://www.jns.org/memri-adds-white-supremacism-to-its-research-of-the-jihadi-threat/
Angemon says
The wagons are circling and the people inside are getting more and more histrionic. Thus the ever-increasing shrieking and public displays of “virtue”…
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
Battle says
Free Aachen
James Lincoln says
Renaming the District center in Aachen renamed Mosque Square is purely a power move.
Not likely that there will be any new “Cathedral Squares.”
Aachen Mayor Marcel Philipp of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) Party should be ashamed of himself.
gravenimage says
Good point, James.
Spiro says
Is any part of Western Europe not caved in to Islam
The west is surrendering one piece at a time
Is it to late
Battle says
Aachen Square To show the tolerance and diversity of the Hagia Sophia massacre should be named the Descendants of Hagia Sophia Enslavers, Rapists and Child Molesters of Christian Sisters, Christian Wives and Children Mosque?
Manny says
Aachen? Aachen? The great and ancient city of Aachen, the home of Charlemagne, the city that goes back to Rome? Good Lord. Western culture has disintegrated.
Simon Platt says
Aachen? Aix la Chapelle? What city could be more symbolic for Moslem colonists? Rome. of course, but is there anywhere else?
CRUSADER says
Aachen has a population made up of about 11,000 Turks and Syrians who would likely utilize this mosque square.
Cathedral of Aix-la-Chapelle, is a Roman Catholic church in Aachen, western Germany, and the see of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Aachen. It is claimed as one of the oldest cathedrals in Europe and was constructed by order of the emperor Charlemagne, who was buried there after his death in 814. For 595 years, from 936 to 1531, the Palatine Chapel, heart of the cathedral, was the church of coronation for thirty-one German kings and twelve queens. The church has been the mother church of the Diocese of Aachen since 1802.
The octagon in the centre of the Cathedral was erected as the chapel of the Palace of Aachen between 796 and 805 on the model of other contemporary Byzantine buildings (e.g. the Basilica of San Vitale in Ravenna and the Little Hagia Sophia in Constantinople). The architect was Odo of Metz, and the original design was of a domed octagonal inner room enveloped by a 16 sided outer wall. The span and height of Charlemagne’s Palatine chapel was unsurpassed north of the Alps for over two hundred years.
————-
Of course, aside from Aachen / Aix la Chapelle, Vienna would be the golden apple for Muslims to overtake, as revenge for losing their last chance after 11th September, 1683, VIENNA:
“Day of the Siege”
CRUSADER says
Battle of Vienna, 1683: A Documentary