President Trump is visiting the U.K. and not without the expected exchange of hostilities between him and London’s Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan. Khan has told the BBC…
“Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe: It risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the world and plays into the hands of the extremists.”
While, Donald Trump has just stated of Khan…
“He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me”
By all indications, Trump’s words are valid and meaningful above Khans cheap identity politics and the permanent stain he wears as mayor. In Sadiq Khan’s London, Somalian parents are now sending their children back home because they think their children will be safer from knife attacks in the jihad war-torn country of Somalia, rather than in London.
As earlier reported by Jihad Watch, London has seen “a knife crime epidemic that has struck the city which has seen 51 murders this year”.
Also in London: a Muslim migrant “acid gang” was sentenced four months ago following violent, unprovoked attacks on gays. London gangs also include “the Mali Boys“, which are becoming “more ‘organised, ruthless and driven by drugs profits.” Mali is a Muslim country plagued by Islamic rebel groups aiming to impose strict Islamic law across the country. The groups include: Ansar Dine, Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the Signed-in-Blood Battalion and the Islamic Movement for Azawad. Somali rape gangs have also victimized girls in London.
Despite Sadiq being a disastrous failure, he has viciously attacked Trump in past and continues ongoing. He has also “repeatedly said in jest that his Muslim faith could pose problems during future U.S. visits”, whatever that means.
Khan’s Trump-obsession took to the streets in 2017, when he “told a crowd of 10,000 in central London” while speaking at a “screening of The Salesman, a new film by Muslim director Asghar Farhadi”……
“President Trump can’t silence me….We stand in solidarity with all those who are discriminated against because of their nationality, their faith or their background.”
“The long and bitter feud between Trump and London Mayor Sadiq Khan”, by Tick Noack, The Washington Post, June 3, 2019:
When presidents embark on prestigious state visits abroad, in the past they were expected to leave their political disputes at home and put on a friendly face for the nation hosting them.
But when President Trump arrived in London on Monday for a long-delayed state visit to Britain, he ignored both customs. Circling back to a long feud with Sadiq Khan, London’s first Muslim mayor and a vocal critic of Trump, the president tweeted: “@SadiqKhan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly ‘nasty’ to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom.
“He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me,” Trump wrote, before casually adding a stab at another U.S. critic, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio (“dumb and incompetent”), and shaming Khan for being “only half his height.”
As mayor of London, Khan governs a city that is about as populous as Switzerland — but still, he remains a locally elected official with limited sway over policies. How did he make it into the top category of Trump’s favorite foreign foes, who has been more consistently mocked and derided by the president than other foreign politicians, including North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un?
Khan, his own supporters say, has managed to hit the president where it hurts most, by winning election in a liberal and diverse city on promises that go against Trump’s core policies, granting permission for a “Trump baby” balloon to fly over the skies of London during Trump’s work visit there last year and deploying his own biography to try to prove Trump wrong….
Dawne Swift says
Sadiq Khan is a) virtue signalling b) entrenching his appeal to the growing Muslim population in London and c) trying to deflect attention away from his appalling record as London Mayor. It’s very very good that Trump continues to call him out on it, rather than just ignoring the pipsqueak.
mortimer says
Most Muslims barely practice Islam and know that Trump’s statement (‘I think Islam hates us’) is accurate. Most Muslims merely ignore the majority of Islam’s teaching which stop them from enjoying their lives.
Islam turns everyone into a liar since it may not be criticized. Muslims lie to other Muslims about their true thoughts on Islam, and kafirs may not speak about Islam honestly either without name-calling.
The Soviet union collapsed because it was crushed under the weight of millions of lies. The biggest lie is that Islam is a religion teaching love and peace. Islam teaches ‘BARAA’ (apartheid from kafirs) and JIHAD (conflict or militant ‘struggle’ against kafirs).
Michael Copeland says
“Islam hates us” and instructs muslims to hate us.
“Muslims in the West must have an attitude of enmity and hatred of the kaffirs.” — islamqa.com
“You should hate them, disown them and their religion” – Alminbar.com
“You must love the muslims and hate the kuffaar” – muslimsagainstvoting
gravenimage says
Mortimer, if most Muslims ignored the violent diktats of Islam then we would not face a threat from Jihad.
Ursula says
gravenimage, you are so right.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Ursula.
Brian hoff says
You donot know what you are talking about. First Islam is than religion of peace. I rename right wing wrongwing. Leftwing is correctwing..
gravenimage says
Does “Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–consider all 35,000+ Jihad terror attacks just since 9/11 to be indicative of “peace”? I guess so…
IanB says
You need to improve your taqiyya Brian. It’s too obviously clumsy.
job says
Brian Hoff, what have you been smoking?
Charles Lutz says
Mortimer, if Socialism in the Soviet Union was “crushed under it weight of lies”, it cannot be very far when Capitalism is likewise “crushed”. Virtue Signaling, Mort ?
gravenimage says
How is free trade “lies”? It has created the freest, wealthiest societies in human history.
A_M_Swallow says
It was the supporters and managers of Socialism that were lying. It is the enemies of capitalism that are lying. A big difference.
Although some firms that allowed liars into powerful positions are in big trouble.
gravenimage says
Agreed, A_M_Swallow.
Westman says
Maybe Kahn has simply arrived at his “level of incompetence” as described in the “Peter Principle”. Islam may well, be a major factor in that it both gave him voters and also limits his ability to act against Islam-based violence. His response to Islamic violence, “part and parcel of a large city”, is a rather stark admission that he’ll do nothing.
gravenimage says
He may be incompetent, but I think he also does not much want to do anything about Muslim violence in London.
A_M_Swallow says
Peter Principle.. That is an interesting thought. When Kahn was a Member of the British Parliament he could get away with only representing Muslims – there are plenty of other MPs who can represent whites and Jews. When he become Mayor of London he had to represent everyone. Initially he continued to only represent Muslims. It is possible he has reverted to his bad behaviour.
gravenimage says
Khan is far worse than incompetent–he is sinister.
Cicero says
London does nor represent the whole of the U.K. nor does the current Mayor of London speak for the entire U.K. However he represents the large Muslim and non white population of London- the richest region in all of the United Kingdom.
This large Muslim and non white Electorate will inevitably occupy positions of power and influence which , in their decisions and allocation of central government funds will promote the advancement of Islam in the U.K.
The ordinary citizen ( from the general tenor of their comments) does not understand London Mayor Khan.s agenda since they fail to educate themselves about the contents of the Koran and the view Muslims hold of non Muslims .
Any person who has some working knowledg3 of the Islamic ideology will decipher the message behind Khans public declarations. He sees himself as a Muslim first and foremost: as a spokesperson for Muslims : as a jihadist by speech and pen against non Islamic status quo. He hates and derides Trump not because of his sexism and alleged racism but because Trump imposed a ban on travel from some Muslim countries.
Non Muslim seem not to understand that there is no forgiveness or compassion in Islam . Muslims are merciless if they are crossed. They are vengeful and they will pursue revenge for centuries. Khans stance against Trump seems to be seen in this context.
Raja says
Cicero, Very well summed up Islam for everyone visiting here. Thanks.
mortimer says
x2 … excellent!
Paul J says
Well said
Jayell says
“(Khan) hates and derides Trump not because of his sexism and alleged racism but because Trump imposed a ban on travel from some Muslim countries…”
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t it Obama’s administration that started this travel-ban ball rolling? In which case why should Khan attack President Trump on this issue? Or is it just another excuse for Khan to make an exhibitionist egotistical prat of himself on the world stage as he’s always doing? And doesn’t realise it?
IanB says
Well stated Cicero. There are, however, many of us in the UK who understand the danger of Islamisation, are well read on Islam, oppose jihad and Islam’s leftist supporters. But you are correct – many others are lamentably ignorant including politicians such as soon departed PM Theresa May. I often wonder about the Queen’s opinion on Islam. She was very close to Winston Churchill and will probably have knowledge of his opinions on Islam.
Rufolino says
What can be said about the Queen is that she is extremely experienced and astute, especially when it comes to seeing through political manipulations.
She is sincerely involved with the welfare of her peoples, and stands for what she sees as their interests in her engagement with the Prime Minister. The Queen lives the Oaths which she swore, to serve the best interests of her people.
She has the Constitutional right to advise and to warn. But the Queen has to do all this out of public view, in private: if this is seen, it will inevitably get interpreted as political partisanship, which the Sovereign must avoid at all times. Conflicts must often emerge, but they must be dealt with out of sight and hearing.
The Queen is on a different level to a President. Not elected, she believes she owes her extraordinary position to the Grace of God and the will of her people..
Wellington says
Disagree again, Rufolino. The Queen and the entire Royal Family have said nothing as the UK has slipped into the twin idiocies of political correctness and multiculturalism and, as well, has welcomed hundreds of thousands of Muslims into a nation which Muslims mean to destroy.
My God, if you can’t stand up to idiocy and iniquity, which the Queen certainly has not, while your nation is dying and losing freedom, due to “constitutional protocols,” then said protocols need to go by the board and a constitutional crisis is definitely in order.
The Queen has remained silent while her nation’s liberty is evaporating. And you want to defend this woman? Shame on this woman for all time. Aethelraed the Unready would be preferable to her, indicative of how dismal she’s been (at least Canute did not want to destroy Anglo-Saxon liberties but Muslims and Western Leftists sure do).
The UK NEEDS a constitutional crisis since nothing else seems to be working. Queen Elizabeth could have led this effort. She has not. Profound shame on her forever for being derelict here. She is worse than useless. I’m sick of her.
gravenimage says
Rufolino, her father King George did indeed publicly speak out against the threat of the Nazis.
Raja says
Rufolino , Your comment on the protocol driven Queen is excellent but the way she has managed her family is far from satisfactory. To me the eternally hobnobbing prince with Islam is a total disgrace. I bet prince Charles knows nothing about Christianity but he and his late wife would accept the hate filled genocidal Kuran in full public view at public platforms. The late wife would have been alive today she might be a Muslim, like Goldsmith’s daughter Jemima(ex wife of Pak PM)
Sure she cannot influence the public about the good and the bad but as Wellington says she has not had the moral courage to call out Islam for its evil especially its liberty sapping sharia and other marauding commands that act like standing orders to the zealots or pious
mortimer says
Quote from whitewashing Sadiq Khan: “Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe…”
Actually, the reverse is true. Candidate Trump already in March 2016 accurately observed: “I think ISLAM HATES US.”
Trump’s statement is LITERALLY CORRECT. Islam contains a CANONICAL TEACHING that commands Muslims to HATE and SHOW HOSTILITY towards all disbelievers ‘for the sake of Allah’ … It is called “AL WALAA WAL BARAA”. Whether by instinct or by knowledge, candidate Trump was one of only a handful of politicians that observed Islam correctly.
Allah ordered Muslims to have Baraa (to be ‘CLEANSED”) from the dirty kufaar and from kufr and shirk.
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, “It is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed (Islamic faith) and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen (i.e. wrong worshippers). So anyone who isn’t HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source “Al Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salaf”, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca.
– Dr. Muhammad Saeed Al-Qahtaani said: “Thus, it is clear that Al-Wala’ Wal-Bara calls on Muslims to “love” their fellow Muslims and hate the non-Muslim (or Kafir).”
– from Sufi scholar Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to HUMILIATE them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING. It is intended to hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”
– from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show ANIMOSITY and HATRED towards disbelievers and NEVER support them.”
Donald Trump’s view of Islam is the same view as that of Islam’s leading scholars, namely, ISLAM HATES KAFIRS.
Anjuli Pandavar says
Agree with you 100%, Mortimer, and well laid-out, too.
—
“The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs. …to HUMILIATE them …They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING. …To hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.” (Ahmad Sirhindi) — and for centuries that worked. But those days are gone. So Muslims, take note:
1. “The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs…to HUMILIATE them”:
We kufaar are enlightened enough and decent enough to *not* be humiliated by Muslim insults. On the contrary, we are disgusted with such behaviour and think all the less of you for finding honour in it. You even call it “honour” when you murder your daughters. To us, that’s barbarism. So forget about humiliating us. With your 7th-century values, you cannot.
2. “They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING”:
What? With your ignorance, superstition and backwardness? When your highest virtue is mass murder to glorify your Allah? I’ve got news for you: we constantly remain appalled and filled with revulsion. Why is that? *Because we know better*. Yeah, get used to it. It is *you* who are the vilest of beings, not us. So no, we are neither terrified nor trembling. Your gruesome murders and unspeakable cruelty do not impress us. A few centuries ago, maybe. We allow ourselves to be ethical and we value our humanity. Besides, nowadays we can all read your horrific scriptures for ourselves (we have near-universal literacy, how about that?) and we know your religion is not what you’d have us believe it to be. We despise you all the more for thinking you can bullshit us with your “final religion” crap, as if we also still dwell in the 7th century.
3. “To hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam”:
For us, 21st-century civilised people, honour and might lie not in holding others under contempt. Honour, for us, lies in equality and respect for all. Might lies in our ability to preserve peace. But, of course, you’ll never get it because you were already “the best of peoples” back in the 7th century and have seen no need to learn anything since.
That’s how you fell behind the kufaar and that’s how you remain behind the kufaar. And now you want to take over the 21th century from us and drag us all down the 7th century pit with you. Well guess what? Your own fellow Muslims are growing tired of the way Islam insults and humiliates them. Increasing numbers of them are no longer terrified of your fatwas and punishments. They no longer tremble before your “scholars” and frenzied mobs. They hold you in contempt for what you’ve done to them since their childhood. Your days are numbered, no matter how many mayors you have in how many of our fine cities. You’re history, in every sense of the word. And by the way, killing more people isn’t going to solve that, no matter what Muhammad and his messenger have to say.
Mickyzip says
A+
Raja says
Anjuli, Excellent comment but I doubt if many 7th century cultures were any where closer to Islam in barbarity. meanness, even Prithviraj Chauhan, though he defeated Mohd of Ghazni 17 times treated him with respect.
Demsci says
Well said Anjuli Pandavar!
What I would like to say to Muslims: why would Mohammed be the final prophet? For how long will he have that status? It is already 1400 years, yet no judgement day yet and also no intervention of Allah in all that time! Don’t you get tired of waiting?! And to think that before Mohammed prophets abounded (was it 120000 that he said there had been before he finalized?) according to him? Can we challenge you to an ultimatum? If judgement day does not come before 2030 you call it quits?
And; why don’t you consider that an intervention by Allah almighty should have to be of “some use” to mankind. In a way, in the discussion between Islam and other religions and atheism a simple “draw” will not suffice. When all Islam is capable of bringing that is advantageous to mankind is something that is also provided by the Kufars why in heavens name did Allah intervene? Or is he doing this intervention all for HIMSELF?!
You insult Allah or God with crediting him with such a useless egoistic intervention. And mind you, our argument is that Islam cannot even reach a “draw” with so many other religions, cultures. But more than a “draw”; you can never convincingly argue that!
Islam is no more than a hobby for you. True or Useful it is not.
Paul J says
That’s more like it Mortimer, you are a font of knowledge re Islam.
gravenimage says
+1
mortimer says
Sadiq Khan CANNOT ‘prove Trump is wrong’ … he can only make this claim to people who are uninformed … because Khan cannot OVERRULE or EXPUNGE the teaching of AL WALAA WAL BARAA which is an authentic, ‘ESSENTIAL’ Islamic doctrine.
AL WALAA WAL BARAA is a much a core teaching in Islam as the Golden Rule is in Judaism and Christianity.
AL WALAA WAL BARAA is a teaching of bigoted hate directed from Muslims against the dirty kufaar ‘for the sake of Allah’. All Muslims are required to hate the dirty kafirs.
Raja says
The scum Sadiq condoned the murder of Lee Rigby based purely on Islalmic ideology. He not only is a Islamic nut case but has no manners whatsoever to represent his host nation UK that has given a free pass to all globalist including Jihadis and Taqqiya operatives.
When a sizable portion of Muslims are the electorate you can expect these theatrics and Islamic supremacist to cheer.
We live in tragic and stupid times.
mortimer says
Agree with Raja. Most Muslims have only the foggiest notion of what Islam actually teaches, but they retain a strong sense that they are in some special way ‘SUPERIOR’ to the kafirs … though they clearly see that Muslim countries are INFERIOR and the least desirable places to live.
Raja says
Thanks Mortimer for your reply.
When a Muslim says he is superior he means it in all respects including a race that is the prime reason they call Islam a race. Because of Islamic supremacist ideology very few Muslim would agree with you that their country is inferior in any way.
For Muslims genocide, rape, mean treatment / torture of kufars is part and parcel of “greatest Islam”. For them it is also a cleansing operation from time to time undertaken by zealots of Islam/allah/mohd
Raja says
Mortimer,
Muslims and non Muslims want to migrate to the West not because of better demographic index. Though that is one o the reasons the objective is to make millions. I was scheduled to visit UK in 2005 on a student visa that was a fraud.
Imagine an immigrant having bag full of money for a big apartment with savings for about twenty years in his country of origin. Look at his social status:: The returnee(if he ever returns) is super rich, girls encircling him as he is most sought after commodity. For a Muslim it could mean jannath(heaven)
Paul J says
It reminds me of the Latin mass. People could speak Latin at mass but didn’t know what it meant. Muslims can recite the Qur’an but still not know what it means. Considering more than half are illiterate, they will still defend something they don’t understand. I think alot of muslims are well aware of how sick and evil it is but are afraid to say so for fear of the consequences.
Sentinel says
Latin masses, which are quite rare post Vatican 2, have translations into the vernacular. The Muslims recite the Quran with no idea about translation.
tim gallagher says
Mortimer, you have a huge amount of knowledge of islam, so when you say that most Muslims don’t know the content of their religious ideology, I suspect you are right. I suspect that they get fed plenty of hate filled poison at their mosques and at home, etc. I think of Muslims, even if they don’t know the Koran, etc, as mostly having a bad attitude towards non-Muslims. I believe they just soak up all this nasty and hate filled (them and us) mentality throughout their life. I think one of Brigitte Gabriel’s books was titled “Because They Hate”, wasn’t it? I know someone had written a book with that title and I thought it was spot on about Islam. That sums up the nasty stance that I suspect most Muslims have. You often mention the same attitude, where Muslims are commanded not to be friends with us non-Muslims, etc. The AL WALAA doctrine that you mention.. Then again, I’m aware that I have grown to hate islam. So I guess I’ve become a bit like the Muslims in my attitude. But I will say that I didn’t start out feeling that way.
gravenimage says
Raja, did Khan actually say this about Lee Rigby’s murder? I can’t find any source.
peter says
I see a lot of Obama in Sadiq Khan!
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe: It risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the world and plays into the hands of the extremists.
Ignorance of Islam is maybe the world’s single biggest problem, yes, but the information that would relieve the ignorance is not what Mayor Sadiq imagines.
“Mainstream” is possible only if the Moslems themselves are have Islam ignorance.
“Extremists” compared to what norm, the one in the Holy Ko-Ran and the Hah-Deaths?
mortimer says
Sadiq Khan knows Islamic terrorists well since he defended them in court. He is two-faced.
Paul J says
The only thing making both countries unsafe are this little pissant and his fellow nutcases.
Carolyne says
Absolutely correct, Paul J. How these annoying gnats think they are superior is a mystery. Maybe they know they are inferior and are trying to convince themselves otherwise. Sadiq Khan is a stupid little dwarf of a man (I suppose he is human but am not sure of any Muslim) who has a short man complex. Likely everything about him is short as well.
gravenimage says
Spot on, APF.
John Allan says
An ‘ignorant’ view? More than a little compounded by Islam’s own gross ignorance.
David says
Please always point about Sadiq Khan is that he was Louis Farrakhan’s lawyer.
Lydia Church says
Typical… he’s such a ‘kahn’ man!
And this ditty:
“We stand in solidarity with all those who are discriminated against because of their nationality, their faith or their background…” would he be referring to all those Christians who are persecuted by the muslims?
What do you think guys? Should I hold my breath on that one?
Ha!
He’s such an obvious deceiver!
Carolyne says
Breathe, Lydia, breathe.
TKF says
When are these wimps gonna learn? When you poke Trump with a short stick, you’re gonna draw back a bloody stump.
Jayell says
“Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe”
And Khan’s deliberately misleading islamic prapaganda is an even more serious cause for concern. Anyway, why’s he so bothered? When he was campaigning to become Mayor he said he was ‘agnostic’, which means that anyone’s view of any religion shouldn’t have affected him in any way. Was he lying?
A_M_Swallow says
It sounds like Khan is part of the 9/11 war. IMHO He is on bin Laden’s side.
Raja says
A_M_Swallow,
To you Sadiq might sound like a terrorist but koran wants them to be terrorists and deceivers and they are experts, especially the elites of Islam.
A_M_Swallow says
The privates are terrorists in the Muslim army. Muslim officers, like first world war generals, stay behind the lines. He is an officer. Deception is a weapon of war.
gravenimage says
Trump calls London Muslim mayor “stone cold loser” on visit to UK
………………….
Yes–Khan *should* pay more attention to the appalling crime rate in London, much of it Muslim.
More:
“Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both our countries less safe: It risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the world and plays into the hands of the extremists.”
………………….
How tired are you of hearing *this*? Khan is saying that if Infidels don’t pander to Islam that even mainstream Muslims will turn violent. What kind of admission is this?
And how many here face those who are in some way ignorant–of their faith, of their professions, of their political views? Probably quite a few. But how many are poised to initiate violence due to this ignorance? Few to none, I’d imagine.
And is Trump really ignorant about the threat of Islam? To some extent, he is–but the problem that Khan and his fellow Muslims have is that he is much more knowledgeable than are most Western leaders.
Wellington says
Fine post, gravenimage, and the time it was posted is the stuff that makes reality even stranger than fiction.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Wellington.
carolyne says
I take Khan’s warning as a threat to the US. At the least it is an admission that Muslims are dangerous people.
Eric Jones says
Is there any Christian in London who can run against Khan in an election and defeat him?
Eric
W says
Maybe, but in the very near future the rapidly changing demographics of London will make it impossible and London will cement it’s place in the Muslim world and officially be classed a sh@t hole.
A_M_Swallow says
I do not know if there is a viable Christian alternative. It will be necessary to tell all the foreigners and non-Muslims that they must not vote for the Labour Party.
Sentinel says
Why did the Londoners vote him in?
How stupid can they get?
gravenimage says
A lot of these dhimmi fools thought they were being “progressive” for voting for a Muslim…
Terra Nova says
When you deal with muslims, you deal with the spawn of Hitler. Where they prevail, the next pogrom is never far of. And:
“If you don’t like a rule…..Just follow it……
Reach for the top…….
And change the rule
from: Adolf Hitler
Islam brings us millennium old war on human freedom and dignity !
Wise words from divers people.
Kahn tries to be a real muslimleader in London, he wants to be friends with the white people too, as he is not yet sure if the white people will defend him, if everything explodes. Kahn, I will tell you, I won’t defend you,
You are two faced and not trustworthy and I know, Muslims always work from within, they try to get into high
positions, (under the mom of bringing parties together) and then they get in all the muslims and change the rules, they learned that from Adolf Hitler. They were his best pupils.
That was why it was so stupid to get muslims into high positions, mayors, police, etc.
But they were all warned for that and they did it anyway. If you deal with muslims, you deal with lies all the time and in that they are Masters, 2 faced masters, better then us.
Sally Donaldson says
How convenient that the Grand Mufti Of London Khan became the Mayor with only 13% of the population of London voting in the last election
gravenimage says
That number is just pathetic.
Linde Barrera says
1)- I love my president, Donald Trump, because he is politically incorrect, is not a “professional politician” and is not on the government dole. I will definitely vote for him again.
2)- I will comment on London’s Mayor Sadiq Khan. This Muslim man seems (as countless Muslims seem) to be under the spell of a so-called god called “Allah” who asks his believers/adherents to engage in acts of terror to further this god’s philosophical doctrines. Therefore, the god of the Muslims sanctions acts of violence against people who do not believe in this god. WHAT IS WRONG WITH MUSLIMS THAT THEY CANNOT THINK CRITICALLY ABOUT THIS TOPIC AND LEAVE ISLAM? It blows my mind!
And many good readers here have stated that fear is the prime motivator that keeps Muslims from abandoning this satanic belief system. But if Muslims live in a country that allows freedom of religion, they should not be afraid to leave Islam. If they live in a country with a state-sponsored religion and that religion is Islam, then it is much harder to leave Islam; I comprehend that easily.
I welcome any further comments about this, especially from Brian Hoff, the #1 Muslim troll of JihadWatch.org.
gravenimage says
“Brian hoff”–“Defenderofislam” himself–is apparently a convert to Islam. It seems the main attraction of Islam for him is that he will be able to laud it over Infidel Americans when (as he hopes) they gain power here. A very nasty poster.
I am glad to see you posting here again, Linde. Hope you are doing well.
Mjp says
Who cares what they think they hate western countries anyway they have 1 goal world domination the hell with themb
Sam says
Trump is hated by Muslims and Communists because they hate the TRUTH.
Marigold says
London’s Mayor is pandering to the Muslims and immigrants in London .It is said there are hardly any Cockneys left in London now.Trump has hit the nail on the head and he is to be congratulated for saying it.
ToBeFrank says
Once again. President Trump nails it. President Trump was being kind. However, I don’t have to be; this is what happens when you vote for someone with a Pakistani mentally to govern in a first world country.
SamB says
Sadiq Khan has surely been voted in as the mayor of London. It is a gesture of Western thinking. The same will not happen to any other religious candidate in a Muslim country> Moreover, no Christian or Hindu candidate will ever threaten a Muslim leader even obliquely in their own country. Khan has gotten away with it. He has just signalled to the fighting wing of Muslims to get even with the West. I paraphrase that ” Trump has made the West unsafe with his statements….” who is he to say that unless he has a private cable to Muslim anarchist? Khan is first a Muslim and then a Brit. His allegiance is first the Prophet and then to the Queen. I will follow him when he decries Muslim regimes throughout the world for making Christians lives hell. At this moment he is enjoying that which the ignorant electorate has voted out for him.