Marvel’s Avengers: Endgame is one of the most successful movies of all time, critically and financially, and it’s the culmination of 11 years of an interconnected cinematic universe that spans 22 films.
And Islam has nothing to do with it.
But that doesn’t stop a headscarf-wearing Muslim from New York from wanting to get Islam in on the great success of the film. This Muslim tweeted that Islam –in the form of a Marvel character named Ho Yinsen, who was not even identified as a Muslim in the film- somehow inspired Tony Stark/Iron Man to become a hero, in the first of these 22 films, Iron Man, and that Islam ultimately played a part in saving the Marvel cinematic universe in Avengers: Endgame. And the fact that Islam has nothing to do with Avengers: Endgame also doesn’t stop Twitter from then promoting this Islamic propaganda, in an attempt to make it trend as if it were some kind of news story, and it doesn’t stop leftist “news” websites from “reporting” this propaganda as if it were a fact, and an actual part of the story in the movies, with a number of fools calling this Islamic propaganda “beautiful” and “touching”.
The reason why many in the West pretend that non-devout Muslims represent Islam is because they can’t handle the truth that devout Muslims are monsters. Ho Yinsen, whom the female Muslim on Twitter fancifully declares as “Muslim”, when it’s never officially established, represents the good, he represents science, he represents civilization, and he represents the fight against evil, not Islam. He was imprisoned, along with Tony Stark, by those who resembled Islam’s heroes, jihadists, as they were based in the middle east, they lived in caves, they wore beards, they dressed in rags and they were homicidal maniacs who threatened to murder Tony Stark if he didn’t build them some kind of super missiles. So it’s funny how the one decent person alongside Tony Stark is said to be a “Muslim” by the Muslim on Twitter, but not the jailers, who are picture perfect stand-ins for Islam’s jihadists.
And this Islamic fantasist starts her tweet-thread by letting out one of Islam’s biggest lies, about how in the Koran, Allah says “whoever saves one life, it’s as if they saved all of mankind”. Muslims have been peddling that lie in overdrive since 9/11, and I debunked it in the third issue of my Pigman comic book, The Infidel #3.
And at the end of her tweet-thread, she finally got to her main point, and the biggest lie, which was to attach Islam to Avengers: Endgame, like a parasite, in order to gain something from this massive pop-culture phenomenon. She then had the nerve to tweet that “there would be no Iron Man without a Muslim.”
The arrogance, the endless need for Muslims to pretend that everything, most especially popular things that are beloved by millions of non-Muslims, are good and popular because of Islam, is absurd.
And, of course, a website posts her tweet thread and writes of it as if it’s a fact, as if Islam did indeed have something to do with saving the universe in Avengers: Endgame.
As I’ve written for years: The Only reason we began talking about Islam is jihad.
That is the only reason. But that doesn’t stop dishonest leftists from pretending that there are many reasons to not only discuss Islam, but to promote Islam, and further pretend that it’s a valuable, and even essential, part of our culture. Islam is fundamentally illiberal, yet fundamentally illiberal leftists who claim to be “liberal” support it as if it were their own religion. Despite the most dishonest efforts by leftists who promote Islam, Islamic values are completely contrary to liberal values. While “liberal” leftists claim to value free speech, women’s rights, homosexual rights, etc., they throw it all out the window when it comes to Islam, and they don’t give a damn for Islam critics, women and homosexuals who are abused and killed under Islam. Maintaining their myths is more important to them than human lives. One of the biggest differences between the West and Islam is that we value life, while Muslims value Islam.
If there were any characters that represent devout Muslims in the Marvel films, it would be the villains, not the heroes. Good Muslims, by our standards, are bad Muslims, or non-Muslims, by Islamic standards, and Islam’s heroes are jihadists. According to Islam, engaging in jihad AKA killing non-Muslims, is considered to be the most noble thing a Muslim can do, and it’s the only way that guarantees that Muslims can get to Islamic heaven. Thanos is a supervillian in the Marvel films who self-identifies as a hero, as a savior, of the universe, even though his goal is to wipe out half of all living creatures in it. As with Thanos, the need for Muslims and leftists to view themselves as righteous is pathological, as is their need to see those who defy them as evil.
Islam hasn’t officially entered Marvel’s movies yet, but Marvel Studios has already signaled that they’re going to pay tribute to Islam by bringing its low-selling Muslim comic book superhero, Ms. Marvel, to the big screen. And low sales, low interest, and the fact that Muslims are on the warpath, won’t stop committed leftists from promoting the next group on their identity politics list. Last year, someone at the BBC, who I assume was Muslim, asked the head of Marvel Studios, Kevin Feige, if their Muslim superhero will appear in their films, and Feige quickly and obediently answered yes. Feige never mentioned Marvel’s Muslim superhero before, in the 5 years that she’s been in their comic books, so all it took was a question asked about her for Marvel studios to quickly submit and commit to the idea. And Muslims celebrated, with some saying “it’s about time” for a Muslim superhero on the big screen. (No, but it’s time for an anti-jihad superhero) And Muslims know that Marvel can’t back out now, as they will begin to demand a Muslim superhero movie before long. The leftist idiots at Marvel Comics didn’t understand that once they published a Muslim superhero comic book, that they couldn’t cancel it, even for bad sales, as they do with all of their other low-selling comic books, and that they would have to keep publishing it, lest they’d be accused of being “Islamophobic” and “racist”, etc. So Marvel continues to publish a Muslim superhero comic book, even though it doesn’t sell, out of fear, and they will make a movie about its unpopular Muslim superhero, out of fear.
And it appears that Marvel movies are setting up the introduction of Islam and Muslims in their cinematic universe (where there have been no Christians, Jews, etc., identified in any of them) by having one of Spider-Man’s High School classmates wearing a hijab. Might this character be the introduction of Kamala Khan, who becomes Ms. Marvel, Marvel’s Muslim superhero? Maybe. We’ll see. And no doubt this Muslim character, whoever it ends up being, will be portrayed as the kindest and wisest of Spider-Man’s classmates, as is almost always the case with Muslim supporting characters written by self-loathing leftists, who only portray Muslims as heroes or victims. Consider how the World War Two generation would have responded if they saw “nice” German and Japanese characters in movies during World War Two, with NO mention of the war that was going on, to fully appreciate how far removed we are from even identifying enemy propaganda when it’s right in front of our eyes.
These endless tributes to Islam, when Islam hasn’t earned anything but criticism and condemnation, are sickening, especially while devout Muslims are on the warpath. Based on Hollywood movies, and comic books, and nearly all kinds of Western entertainment, we wouldn’t even know that we’re at war, and that’s a big reason why this enemy continues to mass murder us with impunity. Bad enough that these gutless turds in entertainment refuse to take on this enemy in stories, which should keep them from touching on the subject of Islam at all, but instead, they continue promoting a fantasy version of Islam that has nothing to do with Islam, and which aids and abets an enemy in wartime, as the real Islam does its dirty work in the real world.
The complete absence of Jihad from Marvel’s Muslim superhero comic book tells you all you need to know about its purpose. But why wouldn’t Marvel at least have its Muslim superhero take on jihadists who they would no doubt claim have “perverted” Islam? Because they feel that any kind of acknowledgment of the war we’re in would defeat the entire purpose of their propaganda comic book, which is to make Islam look good. All while those on the right are routinely vilified by Marvel in their comic books.
Religion has been kept out of Marvel’s movies, up until this point, so of course, being anti-Western nihilists, the leftists at Marvel will introduce into its fictional universe the one religion that’s motivating a war on the West, while completely covering up that fact, and presenting the religion to us as something benign that we should all value, as something that is as American as bacon. This is nothing short of enemy propaganda by our domestic enemy on the left, on the behalf of a foreign enemy.
And while that Muslim whose tweets Twitter promoted claims that Islam saved the Marvel Cinematic Universe, in reality, “Islamic values” have directly led to 35,000+ terrorist attacks across the world since 9/11. And Marvel has the nerve to tell us that their stories take place “outside of our windows”. Outside of Marvel’s windows, the atrocity of 9/11 happened, and they’ve been promoting a dishonest version of the religion that inspired it for the last five years.
And in addition to promoting those ludicrous tweets, Twitter also celebrated Ramadan, and they posted a cutesy cartoon graphic of a Muslim, focused on the fasting that Muslims do during Ramadan, while naturally ignoring the mass-murdering that Muslims do during Ramadan. I just counted the number of Islamic attacks during the month long “holy” Islamic “holiday” of Ramadan (via the ReligionOfPeace.com) from May 5 to June 3, and it ended up being 178 attacks, and 757 people murdered. And merely noting that horrific fact makes one an “Islamophobe” these days. If Twitter’s kind of promotion of an enemy ideology took place during World War Two by an American company, while the atrocities that an enemy ideology inspired were ignored, it would have been considered treasonous by the American people, and maybe even by the U.S. government at the time. Now, the people and the government accept this kind of abnormal enemy propaganda by U.S. companies as the norm, without complaint. It should be an outrage, as it helps an enemy during wartime, while suppressing the truth about that enemy that we need to know about in order to defeat it.
Islamic values are antithetical to Western values, but stating that fact is seen as antithetical to Western values, according to leftists, whose values are also antithetical to Western values. The West can survive only so much leftist treason in this nuclear age.
A big reason why the Islamic enemy remains undefeated is because it remains uncriticized and unexamined. Those who should be criticizing it, the intellectuals among us, those who are supposed to seek out the truth, and speak it, are silent. And then there are those who pretend that Islam’s fine, and that it’s just some alleged deviant form of Islam that’s the problem, and they play an endless name game about the Islamic enemy’s ideology, always avoiding that it’s Islam. And the war goes on, with Islam continuing to inspire endless, unspeakable horrors, while at the same time, Islam is being promoted, daily, as something it’s not, as something good, as something that has “nothing” to do with the horrors it inspires, but has everything to do with saving a popular fictional universe.
Since criticism of this enemy and its ideology goes against the “community standards” of mainstream society, then nothing short of a cultural revolution will be needed to defeat this enemy once and for all.
Every so often, I think that because the Islamic enemy got away with the atrocity of 9/11, and that the West then allowed the concept of peace to be hijacked by Muslims, that it explains why the world is more mad and less just than it used to be.
I wouldn’t even have heard of this lone Muslim tweeting out such Islamic propaganda if not for Twitter’s attempt to make that Islamic propaganda go viral. Twitter banned me for criticizing Marvel’s Islamic propaganda, but they promote this Muslim’s Islamic propaganda, and they don’t ban Muslims who’ve threatened to murder me on their platform. The Islamic enemy is reliant on Islamophiles giving Islam cover and silencing Islam critics. We’re eventually going to have to recognize Islamophiles, particularly powerful and influential ones, as aiding and abetting an enemy in wartime. I can already hear leftists screaming “McCarthyism!” when they’re most guilty of doing what they accuse others of doing. The reason why leftists still scream over Joseph McCarthy, and why they’ve done everything they could to completely smear him and discredit what he did, is because he exposed leftists who were actually aiding and abetting an enemy. Leftist witches called it a “witch-hunt”.
There was a time when foreign enemies had to pay traitors among us to promote their propaganda. Now it’s done for free and without being asked. This is an intolerable state we’re in, where treason is now so mainstream that no one calls it treason.
I repeat: the West can survive only so much leftist treason in this nuclear age.

Jayell says
There used to be a joke on this side of the pond that (according to the post-war popular cinema) John Wayne apparently won WW2 single-handed, So maybe it’s time for an updated 1940’s epic docudrama where
gallant muslim warriors storm the beaches at Dunkirk single-handedly destroying whole Panzer divisions at a stroke whilst simultaneously obliterating the Luftwaffe in an Allah-inspired Battle of Britain and demolishing the Moehne Dam following plans that Barnes Wallis had discovered in the Qu’ran. Or maybe this isn’t so far-fetched after that film about Churchill where we saw all those things that DIDN’T happen involving people that were hardly anywhere near the UK at the time.
J D S says
Hi Yiisen? Sounds more Chinese than muslim
gravenimage says
Here’s the background on the character Ho Yinsen:
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Ho_Yinsen_(Earth-616)
Nothing about him sounds Muslim.
keya says
It is so pathetic to see so many Twitter fools praising islam as a beautiful religion. They actually believe this deceiving muslima. Islam’s contribution to the world = zero. So Muslims are always making things up to elevate Islam’s image.
mortimer says
The ‘pathetic fools’ praise the watered-down, sanitized version of Islam that ignores 80-90% of Sharia law … especially the duty to conduct jihad. These ‘fools’ do not praise the vicious misogyny systemic to Islam, the Arab supremacism, the inherent Arab racism, the world conquest, the brutal punishments, taqiyya, jizzya, the cruelty to animals, the inherent bigotry against non-Muslims (especially against Jews).
carolyne says
Yin-whatever it was, sounds more Chinese than a Muslim name. Anyway, these are just fictional people and. Mohammed is fictional so if they want to believe ridiculous super heroes are real, it only proves how stupid they are. In Turkey once a local told me a story about a Micky Mouse cartoon being shown in some village where a villager opined that Americans sure were funny looking people!e.
Earl of Sandwich says
An insult to Stan Lee, Avengers, and every fan!
gravenimage says
*So* true.
mortimer says
Blatant, unvarnished truth from Bosch Fawstin: “The reason why many in the West pretend that non-devout Muslims represent Islam is because they can’t handle the truth that devout Muslims are monsters.”
Only 15% of Muslims worldwide are supporters of terrorism. The other 85% of non-jihadist Muslims either don’t realize they are ‘DEVIANT’ Muslims or else they just don’t care about it.
Our Western Pollyannas have their virtue-signalling ‘tolerance’ in place, but don’t have a clue about the essential teachings of Islam which have more in common with Hitlerism than with pluralistic, classic-liberal democracy.
Our Western Pollyannas know less about Islam than they do about advanced thorium fuel cycles, and yet, preposterously, they present themselves as brilliant analysts of Islam.
mortimer says
Fantastic quotable insight from Bosch Fawstin: “The Only reason we began talking about Islam is jihad.”
Get this on a T-shirt and wear it everywhere. This is surely the main message of the Counterjihad Movement.
gravenimage says
+1
Angemon says
Like I said before, historically islamic nations have the habit of stealing everything that’s not nailed to the ground…
mortimer says
All Jihad Watch readers should read this fine article 10 time for it is packed with powerful aphorisms like the following:
“One of the biggest differences between the West and Islam is that we value life, while Muslims value Islam.”
Yes … a Muslim I ran into recently was ready to sacrifice billions of lives to impose Islam on a burnt-out cinder of earth following a Islamic nuclear war … he cared NOTHING for human life or suffering. He ONLY valued Islam.
Very scary!
christianblood says
mortimer
gravenimage says
This is typical from christianblood–Muslims falsely take credit for something, or mass murder Infidels, so what is it time for? Why, it’s time to slam the ‘filthy Jews’ again! Just despicable.
FYI says
many muslims believe Buraq,muhammed’s magic beast with the head of a woman and a peacocks tail, to be real.
No one has every seen buraq:let’s face it,muhammed didn’t see it either..because he made it up.
So has anyone ever seen buraq?
Anyone?
Bueller?…Bueller?..no one huh?
melek-ric says
“…treason is now so mainstream that no one calls it treason.”
So correct!
This was observed centuries ago by the Elizabethan author Sir John Harington, who in about the year 1600 wrote, “Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it Treason.”
carolyne says
“treason never prospers,
what’s the reason?
If treason prospers
None dare call it treason,”
Brian hoff says
Robert and your fellow antiIslam where so against any tv show that show Islam in a favorable light like the America Muslim tv show that your fellows hater got taken off the air because it accurate show muslim as peaceful everyday people not the violence beheading muslim disobeying the Koran. You also didnot like DC s Legends of Tomorrow tv show haveing than muslim woman superhero. Tv show and comics book show society around then in New York City they would show muslim makeing up than part of the population and than muslim superheroes.
gravenimage says
“Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–wrote:
Robert and your fellow antiIslam where so against any tv show that show Islam in a favorable light like the America Muslim tv show that your fellows hater got taken off the air because it accurate show muslim as peaceful everyday people not the violence beheading muslim disobeying the Koran.
…………………………
Where to start? This article was written by brave Muslim apostate Bosch Fawstin, not by Robert Spencer. And Avengers: Endgame is not a television show–it is a film.
And Muslims had nothing to do with this film–that is the whole point.
And what exemplary Muslim television show is “DefenderofIslam” referring to? Of course, he cannot say.
As for the idea that beheading Infidels is “disobeying the Koran”, how does “DefenderofIlsam” explain this:
Quran (8:12) – “(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels… “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
Is he pretending that “strike off their heads” has nothing to do with beheading?
Then, his own “Prophet” beheaded between 600 and 900 unarmed Jews–and he is considered the model for Muslims for all time.
More:
You also didnot like DC s Legends of Tomorrow tv show haveing than muslim woman superhero. Tv show and comics book show society around then in New York City they would show muslim makeing up than part of the population and than muslim superheroes.
…………………………
Ah, yes–that would be “ISIS”–seriously.
meanwhile, back in reality, Muslims are murdering Infidels–including, of course, in New York City, including on 9/11 and on Hallowe’en of 2017, where a pious Muslim ran his van into bicyclists, murdering eight and injuring 11. That’s how “Brian hoff” likes it…
Abdulrhman says
When you quote from The Holy Quran you should know the context and what doed the verse talk about.. This was the first ghazwa (battle) of Muslims. And there are many many verses that call for peace consider this
(60:8) “As for those who have not fought against you for your religion, nor expelled you from your homes, God does not prohibit you from dealing with them kindly and equitably. God loves the equitable.”
Wellington says
Abdulrhman: The context “argument” is bullshit. The fact of the matter is that you get peace with Islam only if you submit to Islam, don’t criticize it at all, “feel subdued” if you are not a Muslim, don’t dare leave Islam for another religion, don’t dare try to convert a Muslim to another religion, acknowledge Muslims as “the best of peoples,” etc. In short, as long as you allow Islam to dominate, you will get peace. This isn’t peace but a fake peace better known as submission.
Go to Hell. And screw Islam.
Angemon says
“When you quote from The Holy Quran you should know the context and what doed the verse talk about.. ”
Hold that tough.
“And there are many many verses that call for peace”
What, no context on the verse you quote? Hmmm, why? Didn’t you just say that one should know the context and what the verse is talking about? I know your trickery, snake – “context” is code for “let’s not let the infidels know that islam was all about peace and love when muhammad (whose historical existence is not proved) was in a position of weakness and then switched to ‘kill them where you find them’ once he acquired power”:
Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
gravenimage says
The Taqiyya-spewing Abdulrhman wrote:
When you quote from The Holy Quran you should know the context and what doed (sic) the verse talk about..
………………………….
“DefenderofIslam” lied and said that any Muslim involved in violence–beheading, specifically–was “disobeying the Koran”. This Verse proves, of course, that this is utterly false.
As for “context”, the context is quite clear–this is about beheading “those who disbelieve”–i.e., non-Muslims.
More:
This was the first ghazwa (battle) of Muslims.
………………………….
Muslims have slaughtered unbelievers many times over the past 1400 years–why should we consider this a good thing?
More:
And there are many many verses that call for peace consider this
(60:8) “As for those who have not fought against you for your religion, nor expelled you from your homes, God does not prohibit you from dealing with them kindly and equitably. God loves the equitable.”
………………………….
What does this mean? Of course, we know–it means to treat them as persecuted dhimmis if they don’t convert to the religion of blood and death, as Wellington and Angemon ably point out.
Brian hoff says
The Koran also say if your enemies offer to make peace you must be willing to reach than peace agreement. The tv show was the america muslim from Deardom Michigan.
Mecca and Medina did sign than 10 years truce between then. Than Mecca tribe broke the truce by attacking preaceful muslim traveling to Mecca to holy site during the month of truce and when they enter the 100 square mile zone which forbid fighting and killing they still where attacking the muslim. Than bitter foe of Islam travel to Medina to tell the muslim what happened. The leader of Mecca thought they could take advantage of this to restart the war. Many of Mecca fighter and they general who convert to Islam left they post than joined the muslim. 10000 muslim from many tribes march on Mecca. Mecca allies refuse to help Mecca as they broke the truce attack during than month of truce and into the zone around Mecca forbit fighting and killing.
gravenimage says
More Taqiyya from old “DefenderofIslam”:
The Koran also say if your enemies offer to make peace you must be willing to reach than peace agreement.
……………………….
This is only if the Infidels surrender–then they get the choice of converting to Islam, dhimmitude, or death. “Brian hoff” wants us to consider this a good thing.
More:
The tv show was the america muslim from Deardom Michigan.
……………………….
Does the semi-literate “DefenderofIslam” mean “All American Muslim”?
This thing was only on for eight episodes. Lowe’s pulled its advertising. Jihad Watch, of course, had nothing to do with this thing going off the air.
More:
Mecca and Medina did sign than 10 years truce between then. Than Mecca tribe broke the truce by attacking preaceful muslim traveling to Mecca to holy site during the month of truce and when they enter the 100 square mile zone which forbid fighting and killing they still where attacking the muslim. Tge thhan bitter foe of Islam travel to Medina to tell the muslim what happened. The leader of Mecca thought they could take advantage of this to restart the war. Many of Mecca fighter and they general who convert to Islam left they post than joined the muslim. 10000 muslim from many tribes march on Mecca. Mecca allies refuse to help Mecca as they broke the truce attack during than month of truce and into the zone around Mecca forbit fighting and killing.
……………………….
What claptrap. It was Muslims who broke the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah after two years once the “Prophet” had consolidated his power and picked off this rivals, and was ready to attack the Meccans.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/muhammad/hudaibiya.aspx
Muslims have acted this way over the past 1400 years whenever they thought they could get away with it.
We see the same thing today, with the “Palestinians” breaking treaties with Israel, and with Iran continuing to develop their nukes after signing a treaty saying they would not. There are many more examples.
Angemon says
“The Koran also say if your enemies offer to make peace you must be willing to reach than peace agreement.”
The final word of the qura regarding infidels is to “fight those who do not believe in allah”, not “make peace accords with those who believe in allah”. Regarding peace agreements, the final word is “and be not slack so as to cry for peace when you have the upper hand,”
“The tv show was the america muslim from Deardom Michigan.”
Again: acripted/fictional show.
“
Mecca and Medina did sign than 10 years truce between then. Than Mecca tribe broke the truce by attacking preaceful muslim traveling to Mecca to holy site during the month of truce and when they enter the 100 square mile zone which forbid fighting and killing they still where attacking the muslim.”
Citation needed.
Angemon says
“not the violence beheading muslim disobeying the Koran. ”
Doesn’t the quran read “when you meet the infidels strike their necks”?
“Tv show and comics book show society around then in New York City they would show muslim makeing up than part of the population and than muslim superheroes.”
What’s that? I need to look into scripted/fictional settings to find a “good” muslim? Boy, you sure don’t think things through, do you?…
Brian hoff says
The 10 000 wherenot all muslim many tribe joining the muslim to correct this injustice. The Mecca have only small number of soldiers less than 50 left. When the head of Mecca saw the size of the muslim army he knew he lost. He surrender the city and became than muslim. There was no need to muslim to break the treaty which wasnot than peace treaty but than truce treaty since they winning over people to they religion.
Angemon says
“The 10 000 wherenot all muslim many tribe joining the muslim to correct this injustice.”
Citation needed.
“The Mecca have only small number of soldiers less than 50 left.”
Citation needed. Oh, and remember what you wrote before:
So, were the meccans attacking “preaceful muslim” with their big, huge, army of less than 50 soldiers? LOL!!!
“When the head of Mecca saw the size of the muslim army he knew he lost.”
Citation needed.
“He surrender the city and became than muslim.”
Citation needed.
“There was no need to muslim to break the treaty”
Muslims broke the treaty, which had many, many unfavourable clauses to muhammad and its henchmen muslim roda pirates, when they refused to return a Meccan to their family.
Brian hoff says
The British tv show Dr Who have traveling friends who where muslims. As well as haveing people of color on the show.
gravenimage says
I can find no indication that any of Dr. Who’s companions have been Muslims.
And what does this have to do with people of color? Islam is not a race, and Muslims are just as happy to murder people of color as they are anyone else.
Brian hoff says
They where one of the first tv show that broke away from white only white actor and actress. It was the 10th doctor have than mixed race woman doctor who was than muslim she didnot wear than hijab or islamist clothing but dress very modest. The lastest female doctor have muslim friend traveling with her.
gravenimage says
Islam, of course, has nothing to do with race.
The 10th Doctor was played by David Tennant–he is a native Irishman from Northern Ireland, *not* a “mixed race women doctor who was than muslim”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Doctor
As for the female Dr. Who–the 13th and current Doctor–she is played by Jodie Whittaker. She is neither mixed race nor Muslim.
One of the companions is played by Indian-British actress Mandip Gill, whose character is bisexual. This would get you killed in most of Dar-al-Islam. The actress is not Muslim.
This from “Brian hoff” is just sad.
Angemon says
“The British tv show Dr Who”
Again: fictional TV show.
Brian hoff says
They reflect the culture around then and the society around then..
Angemon says
“They reflect the culture around then and the society around then”
I don’t think you know what “fictional” means… In any case, what about, let’s say, Homeland? Or any other setting featuring muslim villains – like, for example, The Sum of All Fears (the book, not the movie). By your logic, then that must mean muslims are, in fact, villains, seeing how, according to you, fictional settings and shows “reflect the culture and society around them”.
BTW, Game of Thrones has dragons. Where, exactly, do dragons live in our world?
gravenimage says
And even here “Brian hoff” is either lying or just wrong–see above.
gravenimage says
Twitter promotes propaganda that Islam saved the universe in Avengers: Endgame
………………………….
Ludicrous propaganda–thanks to Bosch Fawstin for exposing this. And I *love* his cartoon of Tony Stark!
Abdulrhman says
These persons don’t represent Islam. They may even be non Muslims who are trying to disfigure it.
We watch many of American movies and we don’t care if the characters are Muslim or not and we didn’t ask marvel to introduce a Muslim charecter or superhero to their products. But we ask everyone not to harm any Muslim because of his beliefs. Finally I want to clarify that many Muslims are tortured and murdered by other religions’ followers and they don’t recieve support like that.
Angemon says
“These persons don’t represent Islam. They may even be non Muslims who are trying to disfigure it.”
Always nice to see the famous islamic paranoia working…
“We watch”
“We”? Are you talking in behalf of ALL muslims in the world?
“Finally I want to clarify that many”
Weasel wording.
“ Muslims are tortured and murdered by other religions’ followers and they don’t recieve support like that.”
Citation needed. Let me guess: it’s one of those cases of “the people we attacked are fighting back! please help us!!!!!”
gravenimage says
Abdulrhman wrote:
These persons don’t represent Islam. They may even be non Muslims who are trying to disfigure it. We watch many of American movies and we don’t care if the characters are Muslim or not and we didn’t ask marvel to introduce a Muslim charecter or superhero to their products.
…………………….
Who are “these persons”? And it Muslims don’t care if that characters are Muslim or not then why is this Muslimah claiming that this character is Muslim? Of course, this makes no sense.
More:
But we ask everyone not to harm any Muslim because of his beliefs. Finally I want to clarify that many Muslims are tortured and murdered by other religions’ followers and they don’t recieve support like that.
…………………….
What Infidels are doing this? Most Muslims, in fact, are killed by other Muslims.
Is Abdulrhman putting out pleas to his coreligionists to stop doing this? I doubt it.
Brian hoff says
Robert Spencer and some antimuslic critic donot like any tv show shown muslim in a good light or any comicbooks shown muslim in a good light. They only want Islam and muslim shown in a bad light.
Wellington says
Yeah, you stumbled into the truth, Brian hoff. I don’t want Muslims shown in a good light any more than I do Nazis, Neo-Nazis, anarchists, KKK members, Marxists, et al.
Why should Muslims be shown in a good light when they adhere to the one major religion which is, as Bertrand Russell noted almost a century ago, totalitarian in both structure and ideology. Then there is that reputed warped founder of Islam, Mohammed, about whom John Quincy Adams wrote, “The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust—to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.”
And how about that turgid, highly repetitive, desultory, disturbing and just plain stupid unholy work, i.e., the Koran. If you think this tome is something splendid then you can never be a splendid someone.
Yeah, tell me one good reason why Muslims should be shown in a good light. I know of none.
gravenimage says
+1
Angemon says
“Robert Spencer and some antimuslic critic donot like any tv show shown muslim in a good light or any comicbooks shown muslim in a good light. They only want Islam and muslim shown in a bad light.”
Translation: “ignore the reality around you, here’s a fictional TV show that you’re to take as gospel”.
The first people presenting islam and muslims in a “bad light” are muslims themselves when they wage jihad for the sake of allah following the tenets of islam.
Brian hoff says
When the Prophet make the peace treaty with Mecca if was than humiliating treaty for the muslim but the Prophet knew something which his followers didnot know. When the treaty was in effect Islam spead rapidly along the arab tribes it reached about 50 % of the population of arabic. The Prophet have no valid reason to break the treaty at all. On the other hand some in Mecca have valid reasons to break the treaty as they where on the losing end. Alot of unbeliver didnot like the killing of muslim in the 100 square miles around Mecca as it was than very oldl practice. People from other tribes witness the crime than told they tribes what happen. It is evangelical christian who say the prophet broke the treaty.
Angemon says
“When the Prophet make the peace treaty with Mecca if was than humiliating treaty for the muslim but the Prophet knew something which his followers didnot know. ”
Yeah – that he didn’t meant to stick to it and would break it as soon as the conditions were favourable. Just like Iran with the nuclear deal…
“When the treaty was in effect Islam spead rapidly along the arab tribes it reached about 50 % of the population of arabic.”
Citation needed.
“The Prophet have no valid reason to break the treaty at all. ”
Dude, you just acnowledged that the treaty was humiliating for the muslims and especially for the their pedo gang leader, with stipulations such as refusing to acknowledge him as a prophet. The pedo had every reason to break the treaty.
“Alot of unbeliver didnot like the killing of muslim in the 100 square miles around Mecca as it was than very oldl practice.”
What’s this, reverse history month? It was muslims who murdered pagans during the holy months with muhammad first distancing himself from the perpetrators only to later have a convenient revelation saying that “persecution was worse than murder” – i.e, the meccans were allegedly persecuting them (even though it was his men who went well out of their way to chase the trading caravan and murder meccans) therefore killing them during the holy months was halal.
“ It is evangelical christian who say the prophet broke the treaty.”
If by “evangelical Christians” you mean Ibn Ishaq and Bukhari, sure – they acknowledge that your precious litle child molester broke the treaty – they just make up excuses for him, such as having a “revelation” from allah saying that was halal…