In mid-May, the UK government refused “to adopt a working definition of ‘Islamophobia’ proposed by an all-party Parliamentary group”. The definition put forward determined that “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness”.
Now….
Britain’s former equality tsar Trevor Phillips OBE has warned the sweeping new definition of “Islamophobia” is a “bullies’ charter” for Muslims inclined to censor criticism of Islam and Islamic practices.
Phillips, a former Labour politician and son of African-heritage migrants from British Guiana — now Guyana — who served as head of the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) quango and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) which succeeded it from 2003 to 2012, warned that the definition would “make it illegitimate to criticise anyone who uses the fact that they are a Muslim or defending Muslims to make it impossible to contest their point of view”.
The definition of “Islamophobia” was endorsed by London mayor Sadiq Khan, who Donald Trump recently called a “stone cold loser“. Trump’s description had nothing to do with Khan being a Muslim, which as usual, Trump was presented to be “racist” for his accurate description of Khan. Under Khan’s leadership, London has morphed into a crime den, where Somalian parents are now sending their kids back to Somalia to avoid knife crime and where acid attacks have terrified the city, the most recent acid attack was on three people in two separate incidents by two people hidden under burqas.
The “Islamophobia” canard aims to shut down all criticism of Islam and offense to Muslims while shielding the human rights abuses by Muslims against unbelievers. “Islamophobia” instead paints Muslims as the victims, enabling their supremacy over disbelievers. All other religions and ideologies can be criticized but Islam. This sets the Sharia above democratic rights and freedoms. Not enough people question why more Muslims do not advocate for real victims and condemn their fellow coreligionists for widespread abuses instead of screaming the loathsome term “Islamophobia”. Instead, Muslim advocacy groups and leaders blame everyone else for their 1400 year aggression. Trever Phillips warned that “Islamophobia'” is the foundation of a bully’s charter and explains….
“You get a university or local authority to adopt this extremely vague, wide-ranging definition. Anyone who says something that could be presented as in any way related to Muslims can then be shouted down…Essentially they are told they are Islamophobic, that they are bringing the institution, council or Government department into disrepute under their employment contract. That makes them sackable.”
I was personally “sacked” by the Liberal Government of Canada for “Islamophobia” where CAIR-CAN (renamed the National Council of Canadian Muslims) was influential. Targeting other infidels for “islamophobia” will aggressively continue. It is high time that Western countries fully reject “Islamophobia” and replace it with “anti-Muslim bigotry”.
“The Government has yet to formally adopt the definition, with Equalities Office officials noting that the law “defines ‘race’ as comprising colour, nationality and national or ethnic origins, none of which would encompass a Muslim or an Islamic practice”
It is also high time that democracy-respecting Western nations pull out of the United Nations which has been steadily tightening its alliance with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. This deadly alliance serves to exert more pressure on democracies. Democracy is incompatible with the Sharia. When citizens of a democracy visit Islamic countries, they are expected to show respect for the Sharia. Sharia adherents on the other hand expect democracies to bow to the sharia once they immigrate to the West.
“Even the usually politically correct National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) has expressed“some concerns about the proposed definition of Islamophobia”, suggesting it was “too broad”, “could cause confusion for officers enforcing it”.
“Islamophobia” initiatives cause divisions and confusion. Muslim lobbies do not accept “anti-Muslim bigotry” as an alternative because that phrase puts Muslims on par with everyone else. Such groups seek the supremacy of Islam.
“Former Equality Chief: Islamophobia Definition a ‘Bullies’ Charter’ for Censorious Muslims”, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, June 21, 2019:
Britain’s former equality tsar Trevor Phillips OBE has warned the sweeping new definition of “Islamophobia” is a “bullies’ charter” for Muslims inclined to censor criticism of Islam and Islamic practices.
Phillips, a former Labour politician and son of African-heritage migrants from British Guiana — now Guyana — who served as head of the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) quango and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) which succeeded it from 2003 to 2012, warned that the definition would “make it illegitimate to criticise anyone who uses the fact that they are a Muslim or defending Muslims to make it impossible to contest their point of view”.
The definition, adopted by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims, defines Islamophobia as “rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness”, and has been endorsed by MP including London mayor Sadiq Khan, anti-Brexit Change UK (CUK) leader Anna Soubry, Labour’s David Lammy, and his controversial colleague Naz Shah, who once ‘liked’ and retweeted a social media post suggesting Muslim rape gang victims should “shut their mouths for the good of diversity”.
Phillips cautioned that “What’s actually happening here is that the definition is the foundation of a bully’s charter.”
“You get a university or local authority to adopt this extremely vague, wide-ranging definition. Anyone who says something that could be presented as in any way related to Muslims can then be shouted down,” he explained.
“Essentially they are told they are Islamophobic, that they are bringing the institution, council or Government department into disrepute under their employment contract. That makes them sackable.”
The Government has yet to formally adopt the definition, with Equalities Office officials noting that the law “defines ‘race’ as comprising colour, nationality and national or ethnic origins, none of which would encompass a Muslim or an Islamic practice”, according to The Telegraph.
Even the usually politically correct National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) has expressed “some concerns about the proposed definition of Islamophobia”, suggesting it was “too broad”, “could cause confusion for officers enforcing it”, “be used to challenge legitimate free speech on the historical or theological actions of Islamic states”, and ultimately “undermine counter-terrorism powers, which seek to tackle extremism or prevent terrorism.”…..
CRUSADER says
Jamie Glazov, in his book “Jihadist Psychopath”
utilized the term CRY-BULLY, which is apt ….
gravenimage says
Yes–I’m reading Glazov’s book now. Something every Anti-Jihadist here should buy.
Frederick King says
All people and groups must be allowed to criticize all groups.
CRUSADER says
Ann Coulter explains about 100% chance of Muslim terrorism….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu9-CYhZF6k
Janice Mermikli says
Agreed.
Leslie Fish says
Could the Musli-philiac tide finally be turning?
CRUSADER says
It has to be prognosticated that if society continues down this
self-destructive path of silencing free speech and censoring
concerns and ideas, there will be a social civil war in the future —
in some cases it has already been emerging.
Somehow, the term “equality tsar” sounds like “jumbo shrimp”
— it seems disingenuous and is oxymoronic.
Be that as it may, in an age full of terminologies and catchy phrasing
amounting to little, saying that Pasha, er, Effendi, er, Mayor Sadist Khan
is a “stone cold loser” MAY partly have to do with him being Muslim,
due to the fact that he promotes Islamic agendae OVER equally valid
views, positions, decisions and policies. That — to a critic like Trump —
is akin to being loser-ish, because it doesn’t take into account crucial
concerns others have brought forth; and Con-Khan ignores or neglects or
smooths over (with that taqiyya-laden tongue of his) problems which,
as mayor, he needs to address directly and to fix, but he doesn’t do so
adequately, again demonstrating Caliph Khan’s favoritism and perhaps inabilities.
Of course, it needs to be repeated as if echoed, truthfully, Islam is not a racial
ideology, ALBEIT many Muslims historically have discriminated against many races
and skin-color subgroups or places of origin. (Islam certainly isn’t Nazism, though
it shares many other aspects with Nazism — instance, Islam is highly supremacist!)
It would probably be good for us, here, to pick up and read, or in certain cases,
to re-read “Confessions of an Islamophobe”…. and brush up on the subject matter.
(Buy an extra copy and have a friend also read the book.)
James Lincoln says
Anyone who uses the non-sensical term “islamophobia” should NOT be taken seriously – unless it is used:
Sarcastically
Or
In order to denounce its use.
Raja says
A God sent man for a hopelessly Godless and cuckoo nation called UK and once Great Britain.
Lydia Church says
In a nutshell…. “islamophobia 101”
Someone criticizes islam or actions of muslims based on islam, or any similar combination….= ‘islamophobia’.
Someone decrying the advancement of creeping sharia, encroaching islamization in any public sphere, or any laws favoring islam or muslims in a favoritistic way…= ‘islamophobia’.
Anyone crying out as a victim of any form of attacks resulting from islam, muslims acting upon the koran’s teachings, terrorism from islam, or oppression by islam in any way…. = ‘islamophobia’.
So basically, if you make an offensive move to guard against their actions, it’s dubbed ‘islamophobia.’ If you make a defensive move to protect yourself directly against attacks from islam as a source, it’s dubbed ‘islamophobia’. If you cry out as a result of being victimized in the past by islam and muslims, then it’s dubbed ‘islamophobia’. So whatever advancements they make are deemed ‘okay,’ whatever attacks they launch are also deemed ‘okay,’ but to complain about these attacks or invasions is deemed ‘islamophobia’. Again, they are labeled as the eternal ‘victim,’ no matter what form of invasion they are using, while those opposing it and decrying it are eternally labeled as the ‘aggressor’ or the ‘bully.’ In yet another ironically Orwellian way, by labeling the true victims as ‘bullies,’ they are seeking to bully the victims all the more. Sort of like they discriminate by calling conservatives the discriminators, etc. If you don’t go along with their every move and don’t align and agree with their every step, you are hailed as the ‘bully,’ and shouted down as ‘the problem.’ That is how they are manipulating society in every direction. Once the masses wake up and realize their fate, it will be too late, they will already be suspended over the cliff they were just lead to jump over.
And calling for any form of self defense against the invading armies of islam will also be dubbed ‘islamophobic’…. what else?
Lydia Church says
Essentially, they have given islam and muslims the eternal position of advancement, opportunistic and offensive strategic positions of aggressors and invaders, with a blank slate and nothing to stand in their way, open invitation to ‘take all that lies before them.’ That is what this language has done, it is a powerful tool to shape society indeed and we need to remain aware of these sculptings of their pen.
underbed cat says
Lydia Church…I agree, you stated it very clearly.
Herb says
Basically, the Moslims cry……”Waaaaaaaaaa Waaaaaaaaaa they wont let me subjugate them. They think because Muhammad the self proclaimed Prophet said they are Superior that the world must BOW to Islam. Well here is your death wish Moslim, we don’t subjugate any Moslims so don’t try it because you will lose. You come here as an equal to every man woman and child or get the hell out of America. We will not bow like France and UK. We American refused to give up our arms, and we are armed to the teeth. Won’t take much for us Patriots to take you out and send you to your 72 virgins in Hell if you get out of line. Then again if you fail, you may not get to Hell with your Virgins either. Awwwwwwwwwe po’ baby……go home and kill your kids.
CRUSADER says
Looks as though Britain (along with France and Germany) met in Vienna
to keep Iran in the Nuclear Deal….
— circumventing USA’s sanctions.
owensgate says
Silly Europeans and wanting back into the “Nuclear Deal” – Negotiate? The problem is, in “Nuclear Bomb”, there is only one way to say YOU WILL NOT HAVE ONE. When you “Negotiate” that, the only points on the table are “How Many” and “What Yield”. The “Deal” gives Iran a bomb.
Wellington says
Equality czar? I don’t care that this guy stumbled into the truth, there should be no “equality czar” in the first place. Having such in the UK is just demonstrative of a much larger problem.
Whenever equality is emphasized over liberty, watch out because you are destined to lose both. The ONLY place equality in a free society should exist is in the law. In ALL other situations and cases freedom MUST be placed above equality. One knows this by now or should know it.
Man, the UK is sinking fast. Ditto for so many other countries in the West.
gravenimage says
I certainly take your point, Wellington–still glad to hear Phillips speaking out here, though.
mortimer says
Response to Wellington: it was through the very process of discussing the concept of EQUALITY that Trevor Phillips realized that Sharia law makes Muslims SUPREME, and thus NOT equal, but imperious ‘bullies’.
Wellington says
All fine and good, mortimer, but it’s a shame it took an Equality Czar to have this realized about Islam.
CRUSADER says
Right.
Forcing “equality” down our throats! As if !!!
Or Else! says
Only fools, the deluded, and cowards fail to recognize a civilizational enemy.
Then again, they also think Marxism is worth another shot…..
IanB says
The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) has expressed concern that it will ultimately “undermine counter-terrorism powers, which seek to tackle extremism or prevent terrorism.”…
That is exactly the intention behind the “Islamophobia” hokum.
Kepha says
@Wellington: I agree that offices like “Equality Tsar” or “Civil Rights Commission” are a lousy idea. They’re at the forefront of squelching the North Atlantic tradition of Free Speech, declaring any criticism of the Left’s client groups as some kind of racism or phobia–even if the critic is otherwise accepting of persons.
However, I welcome Trevor Phillips’ statement. Perhaps his work in looking at whether various groups in Britain were being treated equally under the law ultimately sensitized him to an excessive accommodation of Islam in public spaces and discourse in his country. We Americans often joke about how our conservatives are more often than not liberals (or even radicals) who’ve been mugged; but there’s a great deal of truth in such an observation. Maybe Mr. Phillips is one more example.
My own prayer is that the British (indigenes, such as the Welsh and Gaels, ancient immigrants, such as Anglo-Saxons and Danes, and more recent immigrants alike) will recover the Christian and Evangelical (in the theological sense) heritage that made their several countries of England, Wales, Scotland, Man, the Channel Islands, and Northern Ireland great in times past–and one that did so much for giving us Americans an excellent foundation on which to launch our own country (and I don’t have all that much British heritage myself)..
Wellington says
I welcome his statement too, Kepha, but I echo here what I wrote in my above 1:02 P.M. post of today to mortimer.
As for Christianity making a comeback in the British Isles (and Western Europe in general), while that is possible I think it also possible, if not likely, that Christianity will never make a comeback there. Long term (I’m thinking in centuries now), I believe religion is on the way out all across the earth. This will not necessarily be a good thing, though in the case of Islam it will be, but I’m inclined to the view that religion in general will increasingly become anachronistic as mankind by fits and starts moves into the future and eventually the distant future. Science and philosophy will survive, religion I think not. No future Age of Faith is in the offing for mankind I believe. Whether this will prove a positive or a negative I do not know but I think mankind is headed in a direction where religion will no longer play a major role or even any role at all.
underbed cat says
Trevor Phillps is amazing, he is correct, muslims censor any criticism of Islam, because they are instructed to do so by the Quran and sharia law. Criticism even if truth is hate speech, since it offends the muslim, and may more importantly stop the islamization of U.K. . The goal is for conquest to spread Islam and it’s laws. Dangerous and deadly for non muslims. It is done by deception to say it is tolerant or peaceful…but they all deny it with calm faces and reading selective verses. Britain is crazy to keep Nuclear deal, muslims of high ranking know they never kept treaties another forbidden aspect of the doctrine. they come to conquer, so they are being decieved, they will find out too late. But they have a problem….the welcome matt did not say enter only if peaceful and not seditious. Islam is very clever and muslims know it is always done gradually until the time comes to revolt, the work in Britian is to destroy, known as jihad war against non beleivers. Same goal for North America.
gravenimage says
UK former equity chief warns: “Islamophobia” is a “bullies charter” used by “censorious Muslims”
…………………………..
Trevor Phillips is right–and is a brave man for saying so in the current environment.
Rufluc says
Muslims are playing a clever game with the west. Whilst their numbers explode out of control, they keep any objections to their spread and influence to an absolute minimum by playing the ‘victim’ on a continuous basis. Chipping away at our laws and having new ones imposed on us. Playing to the stupidity of western liberal leaders (like Theresa ‘the appeaser’ May, Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel to name but a few examples), who bend to their every whim.
It must also be remembered that a phobia is an irrational fear of something, and there’s certainly grounds for a rational fear of Islam, especially for non Muslims! In fact it is Christians, Jews and Hindus etc that have more to fear from them than they do from us. The facts are plain to see. So why don’t we hear the terms ‘Christianophobia’ or ‘hinduophobia’ or ‘Jewophobia’ etc being used? After all, aren”t we vilified and persecuted by muslims more than we are to them? Their persistent violence towards us is common knowledge and very widespread, so their ridiculous pursuit of having an all encompassing ‘Islamophobia’ definition imposed on us to silence any form of criticism is just a way of furthering their unimpeded spread and eventual conquest of Western lands!
The left are their allies, who aid and abet their spread, and we need to be mindful of that too. Civil war will one day come to our streets if something significant isn’t done to stem the spread of this insidious cult, and I fear that day is not too far in the future.
CRUSADER says
Viktor Frankl spoke of the need for a counterweight to the Statue of Liberty:
Statue of Responsibility.
Only by these two can “equality” be striven for.
eduardo odraude says
Liberty and responsibility are two sides of a single coin. There is no real responsibility without liberty, and no real liberty without responsibility. Liberty without responsibility is not so much liberty as license or libertinism. Responsibility without liberty is not responsibility but slavery.
eduardo odraude says
And if you look at the face on the statue of liberty, that is not the face of libertinism. That is the serious, grave face of responsibility.
gravenimage says
Fine posts, Eduardo.
Kepha says
Spot on, Eduardo. When I visited the Bartholdi studio and museum in Colmar, I learned that the model for the Statue of Liberty’s face was an old-school, responsible, serious, grave, and strong-willed Alsatian mother–a far cry from the strumpet whom the Revolutionaries of 1789 enthroned in Notre Dame de Paris as the Goddess of Reason.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that information, Kepha.
Mr. Cohen says
Jordan has a peace treaty with Israel and
is often referred to as a moderate Arab country:
Yet this “moderate” Arab country refuses
to extradite terrorists who murdered Jews:
http://www.algemeiner.com/2019/05/30/jordanian-refusal-to-extradite-paris-kosher-restaurant-killer-to-france-renews-concern-over-ammans-terrorism-policy/
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
Mr. Cohen says
Professor A.J. Caschetta said:
“The truth is that no amount
of respect will satisfy Islamists.
Since the end of World War II, U.S.
policy makers have nearly always sided
with Muslims against their enemies.
For decades, U.S. administrations sided
with Muslim Pakistan over Hindu India.
U.S. power and technology liberated
Afghanistan from the Soviet Union,
Kuwait from Iraq, and Bosnia and Kosovo
from Yugoslavia.
Americans have fought — and some have
died — to save starving Muslims in Somalia
and flooded Muslims in Indonesia.
In 1982, U.S. power even saved
the loathsome PLO from destruction
by Israel in Lebanon.
And, in spite of all this, the United States
remains the No. 1 target of Islamic supremacists.
U.S. policymakers should recognize that
no act of kindness, no amount of aid
and no military rescue mission will
ever be enough to appease Islamists.”
SOURCE:
While 2018 was a good year for Islamists,
2019 is looking even better
by A.J. Caschetta, 2019 January 11
http://www.jns.org/opinion/while-2018-was-a-good-year-for-islamists-2019-is-looking-even-better/
Mr. Cohen says
If Muslims despise infidel West,
why are they so eager to live there?
Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh of Saudi Arabia said this:
“Would any Arab country open its doors wide to
Christian foreigners and [even] allow them to work in it?
The answer is definitely not.
So why do you demand that others treat [you]
differently than you treat them?”
SOURCE
http://www.jns.org/saudi-journalist-if-muslims-despise-the-infidel-west-why-are-they-so-eager-to-live-there/
Angemon says
Yeah – that’s the whole purpose of it. A de facto blasphemy law.
Rufolino says
And the Blaphemy Law, when it comes, will be made acceptable by extending it to “all religions” -to disguise the truth that such a law will really be all about Islam.
Mr. Cohen says
“…for years, the United Nations (UN) refused
to condemn terrorism, due to sympathy for
national liberation movements that used terrorism
as a tactic, such as the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).”
SOURCE: Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Global Jihadist Movement:
What Everyone Needs to Know (chapter 9, page 187) by Daniel Byman,
Oxford University Press, year 2015, ISBN: 019021726X (paperback)
ISBN: 9780190217266 (paperback) ISBN: 0190217251 ISBN: 9780190217259
Mr. Cohen says
Mr. Daniel Byman said:
“…roughly half of Palestinians say it
[suicide bombing] is at least sometimes justified…”
SOURCE: Al Qaeda, the Islamic State,
and the Global Jihadist Movement: What Everyone
Needs to Know (chapter 3, page 56)
by Daniel Byman, Oxford University Press, year 2015,
ISBN: 019021726X (paperback) ISBN: 9780190217266
(paperback) ISBN: 0190217251 ISBN: 9780190217259
===================================
Mr. Dennis Prager said:
“According to Pew Research, approximately
10 percent of world Muslims have a favorable
opinion of the Islamic State and terror against
civilians. That’s more than 100 million people.”
SOURCE: The World Is Getting Worse
But This Time America Won’t Save It
by Dennis Prager, 2016 March 8,
seen in Jewish World Review
===================================
42% of French Muslims between from age 18 to 29 believe
that suicide bombings against civilians can be justified.
35% of British Muslims between from age 18 to 29 believe
that suicide bombings against civilians can be justified.
26% of American Muslims between from age 18 to 29
believe that suicide bombings against civilians can be justified.
SOURCE: By the Numbers, a YouTube video
by Raheel Raza, 2015 December 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSPvnFDDQHk
http://zalmi.blogspot.com/2016/02/a-brave-muslim-woman-tells-us-what-were.html
===================================
The Myth of the Tiny
Radical Muslim Minority:
(a YouTube video by Mr. Ben Shapiro)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7TAAw3oQvg
===================================
Where Are the Moderate Muslims?
(a YouTube video by Mr. Hussein Aboubakr and Prager U)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Enx4XxO1E
Or Else! says
In a truly free society, NO ideology is above criticism and possible reform….
ONLY ONE prohibits reform, claims supremacy…and wants ALL its criticism PENALIZED.
Or Else! says
The ideology of North Korea’s leaders is in a similar category.
mortimer says
Trevor Phillips is the rare type of intellectual who. once he has realized a serious mistake, will have the courageous to vociferously correct those who at first went along with it.
He now sees that the freedom of expression cannot coexist with blasphemy laws and with
a DOUBLE STANDARD whereby ‘SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS’.
Indeed, the Islamic Sharia blasphemy law was created with the intention of making Muslims into OVERBEARING BULLIES WHO DOMINATE, INTIMIDATE AND TERRORIZE EVERY SOCIETY ON EARTH WITH IMPUNITY AND WITHOUT ANY CRITICISM EVERY BEING EXPRESSED.
Muslims in UK have ALREADY expressed this IMPERIOUS ATTITUDE by telling the VICTIMS of ISLAMIC RAPE GANGS to SHUT UP about their abuse in the supposed interests of multiculturalism.
Muslims are demanding the right to impose IMPERIAL ISLAM and discrimination against non-Muslims without anyone objecting to it.
Koran 61.9: “It is He who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the true DEEN (governance) to STAND SUPREME OVER all DEENs (governances), even though the pagans may dislike it.” – (Muhammad Sarwar version)
K.61.9 … to become “SUPREME OVER, PREVAIL OVER, GAIN DOMINANCE OVER, VICTORIOUS OVER, CONQUEROR”.
– DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF “SUPREME” = highest in rank or authority; paramount; sovereign; chief.
owensgate says
Our infatuation with the muselman will be our undoing. We have been waging war with them since our Republic was founded; the Western World for much longer. It should be sobering to consider that if Martel had failed at Tours in 732 to repel the Islamic hordes, there would be no symphonies of Mozart, Haydn or any other classical composer; we take the good with the bad, and if that means a line of evil popes and a war or two, I’ll take it. An Islamic “straitjacket” on civilization is just plain not acceptable, and our constant appeasement of them is not also. Putting them in Git’mo is one thing. Giving them Korans and a USGS surveyed direction to Mecca with prayer times clocked to the millisecond is way beyond stupidity. What we SHOULD have been doing, is take their Korans away and hiring ex-muslim “imams” to preach Jesus and the Gospel. It’s what Jesus Himself requires us to do – not indulge in dreams of a global caliphate.
Paul J says
Calling muslims a race is as absurd as calling Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Buddhists and Hindus etc etc different races too. No more criticism of Frankie the fake please; that is Christophobic, no more criticism of the Buddhists in Myanmar; that is Buddaphobic, no more criticism of Hindu “honour” killing and acid attacks; that is Hinduphobic, the list goes on and on. Islam places itself above the rest of humanity and has for 14 centuries. Dar al harb and dar al islam has no place in our world today and it is time to end the concept of it once and for all.
somehistory says
Even a blind person can see this is true. It takes courage in today’s political atmosphere to admit that it is true.
Since the time of the Prophets, the True Prophets, it has always taken courage and strength of character to speak the truth that others do not wish to hear.
Today, moslims have increased in political power to the point that all they have to do is look askance at a person telling the truth about them to get someone to help them squelch it. And all a non moslim has to do to be labeled a “phobe” is to look askance at a moslim. The reason for this “political power” is satan the devil. That ancient demon is using every trick in his evil book because “he is angry and his time is short.”
Raja says
Somehistory,:
+1
Larry A. Singleton says
I’ve actually read this ““Islamophobia Defined: The Inquiry into a Working Definition of Islamophobia” “all party report. Including the b.s. from this Bertie Vidgen whose mentioned in this screed. He’s got a video on YouTube. “Oxford Extremism Research Network” (OERN)? I think it’s called. I lose track.
What’s fun is going to their Fakebook pages or YouTube and personally challenging these hacks by asking them to explain the “Islam” in “Islamophobia”.
I’ve asked this question of countless “reporters” “professors” and assorted “experts who like to throw that “Islamophobia” word around like they’re tossing candy to kids at a parade.
But for some strange, mysterious, reason I’ve never gotten a response.
Ever.
CRUSADER says
Might be a great idea to pick up the books by Robert Spencer,
“Truth about Muhammad” and “Did Muhammad Exist?”
Also, there is this documentary by Tom Holland….
Channel 4 UK Documentary follows historian and author of ‘In the Shadow of the Sword’ Tom Holland in search of the origins of Islam, casting doubt on the likely location of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad’s origins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5zxPGk99cM
Andrew E Walker says
Anti-muslim bigotry is no better, for it can still be used as a false label to describe any lawful criticism of what is a supremacist religion. The point must be emphasised without limit – in common-law jurisdictions we are entitled to insult each other pursuant to freedom of speech. This right is under relentless attack, and no label that assists in such attack should be supported under any circumstances.
CRUSADER says
Where’s the anti-muslim bigotry in Tom Holland’s expose’ ?
Jayell says
“The definition of “Islamophobia” “(that “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness”) was endorsed by London mayor Sadiq Khan”….. This is the same Khan that some time ago was heard to use the terms ‘Uncle Tom’ and Coconut’ to condemn a non-European person or certain non-European persons for wishing to assume a Western European or traditionally British cultural identity. These two terms are not only inherently racist (since they refer to aspects of a certain of racial identity) but bigoted, illiberal, anti-democratic and thoroughly disrespectful. That Khan, in endorsing a fatuously inaccurate and contrived concept that has been transparently concocted to smokescreen muslim supremacist ambitions, is on record as parroting (without apology!) anti-European base racist sentiments suggests something about his level of intellectual integrity and personal motivation that would (a) call into question his suitability to hold any kind of position of public responsibility (let alone Head of the British Capital City) and (b) explain the utterly disastrous mess the London now finds itself in with him as Mayor. I listened to excerpts from a public speech he gave, broadcast rrecently on LBC news, and the flat, uninflected tone of voice with frequent, unclear, gabbled enunciation and stumbles over words of three or more syllables plus inappropriate pauses in sentences, suggested a disconnection with the import of the material that he was clearly reading from a script, similar to the sort of thing one would expect from a middle-grade High School student reading out loud material of which they had little immediate understanding. As well as being routinely demolished by TV and radio interviewers (see Youtube), this is the sort of evidence that sums the current Mayor up and validates President Trump’s assessment of him.
Raja says
My compliments Jayelll on your post.
The advocates I have known generally don’t have a flare for English as they are constantly into scheming and plotting. Majority of the advocates don;’t care for morals more so this Islamic advocate. How would they enjoy the host nations language when they have odious hatred for anything infidel and European.(e.g: filthy French, English whores etc)? I have personally rewritten a letter written by an advocate to satisfy a govt official.
I believe that nothing the host nations do would amuse the Moslems as they are not tuned to the host whether it be in heart or mind… Multiculturalism is just crazy and too superficial.
Equity says
Why is honourable and respectful Trevor Phillips always referred to as the former equality chief for all these years.
John says
Why ,Why ,Why ,don’t we all tell the world that the term “Islamophibia” is hate speech. It is so obviously hate speech that I question the sanity of millions of people who think this term is the ultimate truth. No, it is hate speech and nothing else! Please tell it like it really is.
Rose Keeling says
He’s 100% right….It is high time that all Western countries fully reject this word “Islamophobia,” this is a made-up word by muslims to shut down all others that disagree with their ideology and/or beliefs. Proven once again they are not in our countries to embrace freedoms and to live as one people, one human race, but to change all of our countries into the laws and culture of middle east and nothing more….
Man-up people and stop this insanity…. if they love and miss the middle east culture etc so much then they ALL need to go back to where they truly fit and belong…. then everyone’s happy…. Enough of this one-sided agenda of theirs to take over our land, law systems, culture and countries, period.