A sign of things to come if globalists have their way with open door immigration….
More than half of the young people in the Arab world are looking to leave the area and migrate elsewhere.
That “elsewhere” is Europe and North America. Troubling stats, considering the menace of leaders who support open-door immigration and the grim facts about Islamic doctrine and culture. For example:
While the survey shows a rise in the number of non-religious people in the Arab world, it also suggests more respondents in countries like Morocco and Algeria believe that honour killings are more acceptable than homosexuality.
In Islamic societies, culture and religion are intertwined, as the sharia is all encompassing. And what about overall attitudes toward women, apostates, Jews and infidels? Also, while the survey references “the rise of non-religious people,” it does not address the extent of the rise; nor does it explain what constitutes “non-religious” and the impact of culture upon young Arabs. Also, when people immigrate, they generally seek out their own communities, and with the proliferation of mosques where anti-Semitism and jihad are preached, the picture is rather grim. None of this, however, matters to globalists:
European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker declared that Europe had a “clear need” for mass migration from Africa, stating that Europe “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades.”
“Over Half of Arab Young Adults Want to Migrate,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, June 29, 2019:
More than half of the young people in the Arab world are looking to leave the area and migrate elsewhere, according to a survey by BBC Arabic and the Arab Barometer.
The survey revealed that an average of 52 per cent of those aged 18 to 29 said that they were looking to migrate abroad. With some countries surveyed the proportion is much higher, such as Morocco, where 70 per cent — more than two-thirds — claiming to be considering emigrating, The Jerusalem Post reports.
Dr Mohammed Masbah, director of the Moroccan Institute for Policy Analysis in Rabat, commented on the data saying: “The number itself is alarming and has several components.
“Politically, there is a lack of confidence in the government as youth believe the government cannot solve their problems,” he said, adding: “Socioeconomically, youth unemployment is high; the belief is it will get worse.”
The most sought after destination for migration, according to the BBC, is Europe, followed by North America.
While the survey shows a rise in the number of non-religious people in the Arab world, it also suggests more respondents in countries like Morocco and Algeria believe that honour killings are more acceptable than homosexuality.
Experts have previously predicted huge waves of migrants coming to Europe, mainly from Africa, with French-American journalist and professor Stephen Smith claiming that within 30 years Europe could have a population of 150 to 200 million Africans.
In 2017, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker declared that Europe had a “clear need” for mass migration from Africa, stating that Europe “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades”….
Antiislamicman says
Do I guess Islam and Sharia law does not work. These people are wanting to get as far away from Islam as possible. Allah has to be a fake then.
mortimer says
Anti-I-man is correct. Muslims are experiencing massive cognitive dissonance. If Islam is so wonderful, why are all Islamic countries such DYSFUNCTIONAL failed states? They cannot explain why they want to live their backward Sharia hellholes.
celia1000 says
Well, making hijrah is a mandate, to force the world to submit to Islam.
mortimer says
If they have the right attitude and wish to contribute, they may be excellent immigrants, but if they want to bring their Death Cult/Misogyny Cult/Kafir-o-phobia Cult … then don’t come.
gravenimage says
Antiislamicman wrote:
Do I guess Islam and Sharia law does not work. These people are wanting to get as far away from Islam as possible.
………………….
If only this were the case–unfortunately, most of them bring Islam with them, and want to violently impose it on us.
mortimer says
The statistics agree with GI … ‘most’ Muslims (between 40% and 65%) say they want Sharia law. 35% of Muslims or more do not want Sharia. If enough Muslims elect Leftards, the Leftards may push for Sharia which will be simply disastrous … when it starts it won’t stop.
Paul J says
It really makes sense, migrate to a “Free” country to escape the tyranny of sharia law and then demand the incremental imposing of those very laws that you “escaped” from on that Free society. But of course they are not coming to the West to escape anything or improve their lives, they are coming here to CONQUER the West and destroy our way of life.
Christianblood says
gravenimage
BBC is currently demonizing China for sending radicalized muslim youths in Xinjiang to de-radicalization camps, which I personally fully support! What say you? More of this below:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-48825090
Angemon says
christianblood posted:
“BBC is currently demonizing China”
Where, in that article, is this alleged “demonization” taking place?
“for sending radicalized muslim youths”
What, exactly, is a “radicalized muslim”?
“in Xinjiang to de-radicalization camps, which I personally fully support!”
What are the success rates of these camps?
Christianblood says
Angemon
BBC TV news was talking about this over and over again for the past 24 hrs, demonizing China for doing this and hundreds of Western MSM are also taking up this piece disparaging China for the same reason. Look it up, if you wish. The Chinese de-radicalization programs are not like those in the West, they are very drastic, very real and very effective and China is now trying to basically de-islamize and fully Chinafy a whole new generation of Uighurs in Xinjiang. China is is absolutely doing what is right to eliminate the threat of islamism and violent jihad in generations to come in its Xinjiang province.
Angemon says
christianblood posted:
“Angemon
BBC TV news was talking about this over and over again for the past 24 hrs, demonizing China for doing this”
OK, so you watch BBC 24 hours7day. Doesn’t answer my questions:
1 – Where, in that article, is this alleged “demonization” taking place?
2 – What, exactly, is a “radicalized muslim”?
3- What are the success rates of these camps?
“and hundreds of Western MSM are also taking up this piece disparaging China for the same reason. Look it up, if you wish. ”
You brought up that specific article here. I asked you a specific point regarding a claim you made about the article – where, exactly, is the part that “demonizes” China? Repeating “the bad Westerners are demonizing China” is not a valid response.
“The Chinese de-radicalization programs are not like those in the West”
That’s not what I asked. I asked what were the success rates of those camps. Going “but muh Western camps” is not a valid response.
“ they are very drastic, very real and very effective”
Citation needed.
“and China is now trying to basically de-islamize and fully Chinafy a whole new generation of Uighurs in Xinjiang.”
Again: what are the expected success rates?
“China is is absolutely doing what is right to eliminate the threat of islamism and violent jihad in generations to come in its Xinjiang province.”
Exactly what is “islamism”? You keep talking about “islamists” and “islamism” without ever explaining what that is. Seriously, that “response” of yours is exactly what I would expect to see in one of the MSM you decry – no actual responses to questions, just a bunch of politically-correct terms and repeating ona couple bullet points.
Again, CB, three questions:
1 – Where, in the article you brought up, is this alleged “demonization” taking place?
2 – What, exactly, is a “radicalized muslim”? (and, while you’re at it, what is this “islamism” you speak of)
3- What are the success rates of these camps?
Go on, your turn – answer if you can. I bet you can’t.
Christianblood says
Angemon
The BBC is demonizing China for its de-radicalization program by calling its de-radicalzation propgrams among other things, as ” cultural genocide”. Read the article again!
The BBC also sided with the HongKong rioters who broke the law by breaking into government buildings. Of course, the BBC and Western MSM hardly mention the weekly “Yelow Vest” demonstrations that are going on in Paris for six months now!
The success rates of the Chinese de-radicalization programs can be close to 100%!
The term ‘radicalized muslim’ means any muslim who seriously follow and
seriously practice ALL the teachings of Islam, including Islamic Sharee’a rules and political Islamic agenda like hating and discriminating against the infidels, carrying out promoting stealth jihad, practicing Islamic supremacist agenda in all facets of life, taking part in jihadist wars or carrying out violent and jihad attacks against the infidels right at home, fanatically believing not to shake of the hand of the opposite sex, believing and wanting to carry out rules like stoning, beheading, amputation, crucifixions, throwing homosexuals off high buildings, executing apostates etc, etc. Islamism is a term denoting an islamic person believing and practicing all things I mentioned above and more!
PS: More than half of all muslims for various reasons DO NOT wish to practice all the things I mentioned above and the muslims that practice these Islamic rules would consider themselves as serious and true muslims and may consider other muslims as hypocrites and even as ‘infidels’. Terms like “radicalized muslims” or “islamist muslims’ or “extremist muslims” are Western terms invented to differentiate a serious muslim that sincerely practices all islam than the nominal “moderate” muslims who don’t.
Angemon says
christianblood posted:
“The BBC is demonizing China”
Is there anything factuallyy incorrect in the article? If not, what, exactly is being “demonized”?
“for its de-radicalization program by calling its de-radicalzation propgrams among other things, as ” cultural genocide”. ”
Is that not an apt description? It’s exactly what China is doing in Tibet. In any case, if you read the article and were an honest interlocutor, you’d see that’s not the BBC’s stance – that’s a statement by Dr Adrian Zenz.
“The BBC also sided with the HongKong rioters who broke the law by breaking into government buildings.”
Yes, how dare those people in Honk Kong NOT want to be extradited to China to be dealt with? In any case, that has nothing to do with the matter at hand.
“Of course, the BBC and Western MSM hardly mention the weekly “Yelow Vest” demonstrations that are going on in Paris for six months now!”
All you wrote there is factually false.
“The success rates of the Chinese de-radicalization programs can be close to 100%!”
Citation needed.
“The term ‘radicalized muslim’ means any muslim who seriously follow and
seriously practice ALL the teachings of Islam, including Islamic Sharee’a rules and political Islamic agenda like hating and discriminating against the infidels, carrying out promoting stealth jihad, practicing Islamic supremacist agenda in all facets of life, taking part in jihadist wars or carrying out violent and jihad attacks against the infidels right at home, fanatically believing not to shake of the hand of the opposite sex, believing and wanting to carry out rules like stoning, beheading, amputation, crucifixions, throwing homosexuals off high buildings, executing apostates etc, etc. Islamism is a term denoting an islamic person believing and practicing all things I mentioned above and more!”
Three things:
1 – That makes you a radicalized muslim
2 – Do you think that someone who refuses the shake the hand of women should be sent to a “de-radicalization camp”?
3 – By your description, there’s no such thing as a “radicalized muslim”.
“PS: More than half of all muslims for various reasons DO NOT wish to practice all the things I mentioned”
Citation needed.
“ above and the muslims that practice these Islamic rules would consider themselves as serious and true muslims and may consider other muslims as hypocrites and even as ‘infidels’.”
Which is why I said that, by your description, there’s no such thing as a “radicalized muslim”
“Terms like “radicalized muslims” or “islamist muslims’ or “extremist muslims” are Western terms invented to differentiate a serious muslim that sincerely practices all islam than the nominal “moderate” muslims who don’t.”
The cognitive dissonance here is astonishing, even by what we’ve learn to exxpect from you. You spam posts talking about “radicalized muslims” and “islamists” only to go “it’s the Wests’s fault” when called on it – on one hand, you support sending “radicazied muslims” to concentration camps while on the other you calm terms such as “radicalized muslims” are Western inventions. And you even go as far as talking about “moderate muslims”, which, in any other circumstances, you’d decry as a meaningless Western invention.
Go on – my questions remain unanswered:
1 – Where, in the article you brought up, is this alleged “demonization” taking place?
2 – What is this “islamism” you speak of?
3 – Where are you getting the alleged success rates of these camps from?
Christianblood says
Angemon
The real reason why I am pointing out of the BBC’s criticism of the Chinese de-radicalization programs is that the BBC and all Western MSM will always high light any perceived persecution of muslims around the world while they totally and 100% ignore the sever persecution of Christians in the Islamic world. As other Western MSM, the BBC had many well-analysed and well-prepared documentaries on their perceived “persecution” of Rohingya muslims in Myanmar or the Chinese “clamp down” on Uyghurs muslims in China while they will NEVER, EVER do such a documentary to highlight the severe persecutions of Christians in countries like Pakistan or Somalia for instance! Th
Angemon says
christianblood posted:
“The real reason”
Is that you hate the West. not islam, as it can be concluded from your pro Christian-persecuting Iran and you never let facts get in the way of speaking ill of the West.
“why I am pointing out of the BBC’s criticism”
“Criticism”? First it was “demonization”, now it’s scale back into “criticism”. One, if proven, can be be disregarded thrown out the window, the other requires logic and facts in order to make a proper counter. So, go on – why is this alleged criticism wrong? Is there any factual inaccuracy in the report?
Christianblood says
Angemon
The article is not about Tibet but about the Chinese muslim Uyghurs
and the terms of ‘radicalization’ or a ‘radical muslim’, ‘moderate muslims’ and others like them are terms invented by the West to differentiate serious practicing muslims than other muslims who don’t fully or seriously practice!
Don’t waste my time, I said every thing very clearly and very factually and it is up to you to believe what want!
Angemon says
christianblood posted:
“The article is not about Tibet”
It’s not about the yellow vests protests, Somalia, Pakistan or Myanmar but that didn’t stop you from bringing them up, did it? Rules for me but not for thee, double-standards, etc…
“but about the Chinese muslim Uyghurs
and the terms of ‘radicalization’ or a ‘radical muslim’, ‘moderate muslims’ and others like them are terms invented by the West to differentiate serious practicing muslims than other muslims who don’t fully or seriously practice”
Terms that you, not me, tacitly approved of by using them. Which begs the question: why are you using them, especially when conversing with me, since I’ve already demonstrated I loathe such terms?
“Don’t waste my time, I said every thing very clearly and very factually”
You certainly did no such thing. I have unanswered questions. Such as, what’s your source for the claim of a close to 100% success rate?
Westman says
Perhaps this quote from Lawrence Of Arabia, claimed to be approximately what Prince Feisel related to T.E. Lawrence:
“No Arab loves the desert. We love water and green trees. There is nothing in the desert and no man needs nothing.”
It now seems obvious that the migration into Europe is not a hijrah, rather, an escape from heat and no opportunity even though it is already known there is massive unemployment for relatives already in Europe. That speaks volumes about how little the non-oil Muslim nations can offer their youth because of the poor fruits of Islam compared to the West; a West so viewable on the youth’s cell phones that lies about the West cannot be maintained The tragedy for them and for Europe is they are carriers of a quiescent cancer, Islam, that can spring to violent life at any moment.
Mixtli says
Spot on Westman, but why these mohammedans can’t take a cue from Trump’s electoral slogan ‘Make America Great Again’, these mohammedans should make the Middle East great again, but alas, I err, the greatness of the middle east was due to the diversity of Jews, Christians and Pagans living together in actual peace and harmony until the narcissitic and vile Mohamhead, envious of the prosperity these “infidels” had wished to have that also for his Arabians, thus he invented, with help from Satan, his perverted and evil ideology Islam. Once invaded the Middle East by this Islamic scourge, the region spiraled down to the shithole status of today.
ntesdorf says
Having wrecked their own countries as civilized places to live, the Muslims wish to move on to new wrecking fields, still as confused about the origin of their problems, which is as ever, Islam.
gravenimage says
Some Muslims *are* confused–but many know just what Islam and Shari’ah do, and want to violently inflict it on us anyway.
terry sullivan says
its jihad–to feck up other countries
never vote for a muslim
Wellington says
But the vast majority of these turkeys don’t want to get away from the repressive hellholes they live in so that they can live in a prosperous and free West (although freedom in the West is fading fast) thereafter. No, rather they want to make Europe and North America into additional repressive hellholes.
Wherever Islam goes, all kinds of bad things happen, including liberty being put in significant jeopardy. I want no more Buttlims in the West. Who of sense and knowledge would?
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Wellington.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
This cannot be allowed. These people hate their own societies but fail to realize that what makes their societies so unendurable is Islam itself, and the kind of people that faith produces They will not abandon Islam; they cannot bring themselves to recognize its malign effect, in stunting moral and mental growth. They have brought trouble, and will bring more, wherever they are allowed to settle in the non-Muslim lands You do not admit into your midst millions of people who divide the world uncompromisingly between Muslims and non-Muslims, believe in permanent conflict between the “best of peoples” and “the most vile of created beings,.”and have no intention of integrating into Western societies but instead want to undermine them from within. It’s not their choice; it’s their duty
LB says
It would seem that, out of those wanting to migrate, there are three types of muslims:
1) Genuine (concealed) apostates who want to escape islam
2) Ignorant muslims who want to move to a more rich area, not knowing that islam is the sole reason for their woes, and by bringing it with them, they will just create another poor country which they escaped from
3) Actual muslims with islamic conquest and hijirah in mind
Mr. Fitzgerald, in your expert opinion, what are the percentages of those three groups?
Cece says
They should remain in their own countries and try to release the hold of Islam. What is happening is the many are held in thrall by the few. If the apostates or people who do Islam-light, who want to escape Islam by immigrating; still spread it. Then they are pressured into a mosque or to conforming with other Muslim immigrants who do not assimilate. It has the same deleterious effect on the native peoples of the countries they want to immigrate to who want to retain their culture, language, borders. There are now 49 Muslim majority countries. They could go to one of these places but they don’t. They always want to come to western christian democracies.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Hugh. Muslim immigration into the US under Trump is down 90%–it’s a start.
Rebecca Lynn Evans says
Need yo make REAL SURE future generations will know how dangerous they are
Jayell says
“They have brought trouble, and will bring more…….” because the myopic, egocentric lack of social intelligence that causes them to generate such defective and unproductive societies also prevents them from diagnosing the cause of their own socio-economic failures (which they probably won’t recognise anyway) and consequently breeds the characteristic arrogance that will effectively put a block on them ‘lowering themselves’ to learn from anyone else’s success – which they will no doubt see as being merely ‘fortuitous’ rather than the result of a higher level of social and economic competence which they would be best advised to emulate. So they simply blindly carry on as they did before because they are convinced they have nothing to learn from any ‘inferior’ culture, misappropriating any material benefits that they happen to find whilst arrogantly destroying the conditions which produce them..
Paul J says
It also helps the “victim” narrative; it’s someone else’s fault, the West is to blame, so we owe them; they are persecuted; therefore they have the right to get upset and “retaliate”. The biggest problem muslims have is themselves and their beliefs.
WPM says
With the libtards leaders in charge of western Europe who willingly groom, prune , suppress their laws of free speech to exclude anything critical of Islam. Treating violent Moslem adults like wayward misbehaving children ,rewarding unproductive , nonconforming ,criminally violent , to European laws ,customs , with welfare, housing ,health benefits appeasement at every level at the expense of the “native “European population. Appeasement at every level of the European Union (one world type government run by unelected officials) what could possible keep the Moslems from not wanting to go there Europe to live off the government benefits making the “native ” non – Moslem Europeans there own surfs under oppress taxes ,and laws that benefit these 7 century misfits. Yes if you take the Moslems to task that they promote a failed parasitic system of ideology ,you are call a “racist ” by the powers that be and the poor Moslem is a victim even though Islam has nothing to do with race.
Jim Caton says
OK, I’m going to step out on a limb and say something stupid: So, what do we do? Family and friends of mine can see what is happening, but many of us (many of us are in our 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s) feel helpless to make even a dent in the course of events. There are many disparate groups that like us believe many things need to be done, but the one thing lacking seems to be a real “coalition” of all the disparate groups to make their voices heard loud enough to make a difference. If you had to make a list of things that might move us all in the right direction, what might your list look like? For example, instead of immigration do more “Marshall” like plans to make life better for immigrants in their own country? Is it time for the world to put a cap on population growth? Educate politicians being misled about the facts and misinformation surrounding Islam (how to do this without losing your job in today’s world)? Form a true coalition of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Atheists, and so on to make a stand against mistruths and attempts to inject them into our schools other aspects of our daily lives? May the force be with you.
CRUSADER says
“Give the people what they want!”
Freedoms from…
and
Liberties to…
Allow for Arabs to be set free WITHIN their own countries.
Allow for the example of U.S. Constitutional Republic to be learned.
Allow for the Holy Spirit to show the way forward.
Forge your own paths.
No need for Shari’ah.
Invest in yourselves, Arabs.
Convert as former Muslim imam Mark Gabriel had done.
He is happy as a Christian pastor.
drljr says
It is the nature of the Islam theocracy. Invade areas and impose Islam on it. Islam is rooted in deception and violence. Until the Islam government is replaced no one will be safe. Mohammad created a theocracy to try and force people to worship Hubal, the moon god, and when people rejected his lies he switched to violence, lies, and depravity. No citizen of Islam can ever have fealty to a non-Islam governments or people. What Islam has done to the world is obvious.
Charles says
I know many Arabs and Turks who openly question and criticize Islam. Self criticism and introspection about our ancient religions is a requirement. The inculcated belief of the jihadist mindset, and the belligerence of the doctrine are an explicit threat to the host from whom they seek refuge and opportunity. Its time to grow up.
somehistory says
Their places and origins of birth are already saturated to the death with islam. They are murdering all who disagree with them in their own lands. They are running out of victims…young girls to rape and murder…little boys to rape and abuse.
They want to go to new places where they won’t have to work for the money on which to live, will get help to pay rent, will be allowed to attend schools with the young girls and when they commit a crime, get a pass because they don’t know the “culture” in the new place.
They want to spread their evil filth of islam to every nook and cranny on earth, not allowing any person any where to remain free of the satanic scourge.
Cece says
I agree especially with the aspect of being given a ‘pass’ by the new cultures. Since the West is going through a secular period, the progressives do not seem to take religious texts as serious. They do not believe that people will actually, do what the religious text says. Or in the West, they conflate by saying, ‘all religions are the same’. So some of the immigrants commit a violent act and get off by saying, for instance, ‘I didn’t understand’, I am confused, I didn’t mean it, I come from a different culture. It’s all bullsh*t. What, you didn’t understand that it is wrong to kill someone, or rape them!? Stealing is bad!? In their own cultures they would be put to death or have their left hand cut off for stealing. We are basically, giving these Muslim (and African) immigrants the knife to slit our throats and then we are told it’s God’s will. It is the destruction of the West. I am afraid it will be very bad before it gets better. Very bad.
Guy Forester says
Now, what could go wrong with this?
Tom says
Young people wanting to emigrate from their third world environment may be the future forced upon the west by globalists.
As long as the ones who come are strictly controlled in numbers and vetted, are not Islamic, and will integrate into western society, then the future may not be as bleak as it could be.
Control of numbers, societal and cultural beliefs, skills and education, and a willingness to integrate is the secret to the west being able to successfully absorb and integrate immigrants.
The problems will arise when they want to bring extended family also to rejoin them in their new country.
Those people are the ones who will bring with them all of the baggage, hatred, and want to change the west to an Islamic state.
This is exactly what we see with the failed experiment called multiculturalism.
No Muzzies Here says
Well, why not? They are safer than in their home countries. Plus they will prosper on the largesse of those whom they displace. They will not need to work, and will be able to carry out the mandate to populate the Earth.
Thus they will be able to proceed from savagery to a dominant theocracy in about 3 generations, while the host country moves from civilization to extinction during the same period.
brane pilot says
This is driven by a perfect storm of demographics, ideology and politics.
The populations of the Islamic world are exploding into stagnant economies. The young have few options.
Islamist ideology asserts that migration and occupation of non-Muslim lands is ‘Holy Jihad’.
European globalists see both of these factors as favorable to their goal of eradicating European nationalism via mass immigration.
Europeans danced in the streets in August 1914 when WWI was declared. Nothing has been learned.
It dawns on no one that there exists a greater horror than the ones Europe has survived.
Kepha says
Wouldn’t mind a few more who want to come here in order to escape Islam and openly live as Christians.
Wellington says
I would welcome Christians, Kepha. Muslims, as usual, are the problem.
gravenimage says
BBC survey shows half of Arab young people want to migrate to Europe and North America
………………….
Oh boy–just what we need–more ravening invading violent Muslims.
Angemon says
Jake Jacobs says
If clandestine entry into the USofA is attenuated and deportations to exceed twenty million, three things would happen:
#1. Rents would plummet. The homeless situation that plagues the Left Coast would fade away.
#2. Blue collar and all other wage income would drift upward.
#3. Ten million Democratic brain cases would turn into Mount Kiluhua.
abad says
Uh, just no.
We do NOT want more Moslems coming here since they hate us they can stay in their own countries.
Islam has no place in civilized western society.
tim gallagher says
I agree with the sentiments expressed by many of the commenters above. What a hellhole Europe, North America, Australia and other countries will become if they let these invading these Muslim savages in. Hell, they are already doing huge damage to all western countries, but, if we let even more of them in, then our countries will really be in diabolical trouble. I look at Islam and all its backward barbarity, like some left over from primitive times in human history, and at how completely stuffed up all Muslim countries are, although our own countries are, of course, far from perfect (but, compared to Islamic countries they are a wondrous paradise), and I think it is insane to let these parasites (and enemies who want to impose Islam on us) into our countries. I’m not at all surprised that so many Muslims want to get out of their hellish countries, which Islam has done so much to create. They should fix their own hopeless countries.
A_M_Swallow says
> In 2017, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker declared that Europe had a “clear need” for mass migration from Africa, stating that Europe “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades”….
He is one of the EU Commissioners that is so naive that he would buy a map to a secret gold mine and the Brooklyn Bridge to help get there.
MJP says
Everything they touch turns into Caca they need to be stopped
Ade Fegan says
and with the current mind set they will probably all be allowed in !