And judging by Facebook’s treatment of foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women and others, they are likely to find themselves on the “Dangerous Individuals” list.
This new policy incites the violent and hateful among Facebook’s 2 billion users to threaten to kill people whose points of view dissent from the Leftist agenda.
The descent to fascist authoritarianism is swift, isn’t it?
“Facebook Issues New Policy Saying It’s Acceptable to Post Death Threats Against Me,” by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News, July 9, 2019:
Facebook has issued a new policy update saying it’s acceptable to post death threats and incite violence against me, despite this being a crime in the United Kingdom.
No, I’m not joking.
A Community Standards update published by Facebook states (emphasis mine); “Do not post: Threats that could lead to death (and other forms of high-severity violence) of any target(s) where threat is defined as any of the following:
Statements of intent to commit high-severity violence; or
Calls for high-severity violence (unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy)….”
Back in May, Facebook and Instagram banned me under the justification that I was a “dangerous individual”. They provided no evidence whatsoever that I had behaved in a “dangerous” manner or violated any of their policies.
Facebook has designated me a “dangerous individual” and now says it’s acceptable for its users to issue death threats against me.
This is a crime in the United Kingdom under the 1988 Malicious Communications Act which states, “Any person who sends to another person a letter, electronic communication or article of any description which conveys….a threat….is guilty of an offence.”
The largest social media company in the world with over 2 billion users literally says its fine to incite violence against me, despite this being illegal.
They are painting a target on my back.
Innumerable individuals have already sent death threats to me via Facebook….
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
The simplest way to solve all this is to prohibit social media companies from banning anything on their sites.
The argument against doing this (by calling them what they are, content companies) is that social media would be crushed by a deluge of lawsuits filed by aggrieved users.
Who defines what’s a dangerous individual and organization? The awful Zuckerberg, that’s who.
Here’s a proposal, ban all profanity (create a list of words) and ban all threats of violence, whether implied or explicit. It wouldn’t be that hard, and no doubt would be imperfect, but it would be a big step forward. Also, in the case of Google, they’ve been filtering search results for a long time to cut off conservative thought. That’s fraud. They do that and arrest the CEO of Google on a federal fraud charge.
jarmanray says
He is aiding and abetting Imran Khan, the Iranian mullahs, George Soros and other haters of democracies in an effort to put everyone of us in chains or more likely in the grave.
Brian hoff says
Not going to happen because social media network must be able to ban people who break they rules. The head of Freedom Watch is than joke in legal circle. All the legal case he brought against the Clinton where throw out by the court the same when he try to bring up that brither against the president Obtan where throw out by the courts. First she make attack against musin on facebook by calling then terrorist and she make attack against the religon of Islam which where not accurate. They warm her many time about it. Before they ban her they check with they lawgers before they ban her.
gravenimage says
What claptrap from “DefenderofIslam” here.
pfwag says
Of course. They have to allow Muslims to make a death fatwa against an infidel.
Reziac says
I think that’s exactly it. As PJW says this is not just sloppy wording; they have house lawyers to vet every official word. And it’s a too-close parallel to Islam’s tenet that you must be kind to other Muslims, but everyone else is fair game. PJW referring to it as a ‘fatwa’ is not the hyperbole it first appears.
Walter Sieruk says
This is all very interesting in a sinister sort of way that ,as the above reads , “Facebook had issued a new policy update saying its acceptable to post death threats….”
One of the ,many odd and terrible things about this is that Facebook has decided that “death Threats” are acceptable yet on the date of 7/2/19 Facebook placed me under a thirty day ban for posting, on the day before 7/1/19 for posting that “Islam is a death cult.”
This is all very strange ,for according to Facebook with its “community standards” posting a “death threat ” is OK but posting the Islam is a”death cult is not OK.
There is the essay that Facebook banned my for on 7/2/19.
“Many times the jihadist members of different Islamic terror entities, as those of ISIS, have gathered together and chanted the words “We love death, they love life.” Likewise those jihadist/Muslims don’t stop with those awful words; they carry through with jihad suicide/homicide attacks. Any sane person would ask “Why do those jihad –minded Muslims have such a mindset of murderous madness?” The answer is that they obtain the way of thinking and believing from the “holy book” of Islam, the Koran. As some people call it the Qu ‘ran. For example the Koran in Sura 9:111 instructs “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed.” Therefore it may be conclude that Islam is actually a death cult.
In great and wonderful contrast to the death cult which is Islam there is Christianity which is centered on Jesus and His teachings. For Jesus did not teach killing and death but taught and gave life, a good peaceful well lived life and more. For example Jesus declared “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” John 10:10. [K.J.V.] “
jarmanray says
+++++++1
gravenimage says
There is nothing in your post that is wrong, Walter.
Doug Mayfield says
No matter how difficult it may make our lives, it’s time to shun Face Book.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Just yesterday Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple, said the same thing. He publicly stated that everybody should drop their Facebook accounts now. I have a Facebook account, but only use it for auto-login to other websites. I went into it once and was unsurprised by the preponderance of stupid comments there. If I wanna read comments, I come in here. Much better. Screw Facebook.
joanofark06 says
Good! So your saying you left Farcebook? Just wanted to know, did you make sure to delete your account, officially? Cause some people just leave that site, never wanting to return (the most intelligent people), but don’t delete their account. They just don’t use Farcebook anymore, and well, it’s better to make sure it’s done completely.
Ade Fegan says
No no ..
Don’t tell me …..
islamist groups are not classified as “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations” right ?
Brian hoff says
As long as they donot break Facebook rules facebook cannot do anything. In fact law enforcement want then on social media so they garther intelligence on then. There are organized criminals who use social media also
Angemon says
“As long as they donot break Facebook rules facebook cannot do anything.”
I’m pretty sure that calling for the murder of people is against FB policies…
gravenimage says
“Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–wants Jihad terrorists on Facebook to preach to their fellow Muslims.
nosmo king says
Facebook and YouTube etc are exempt from libel suits because they are deemed to be public utilities. But if Zuckerberg is deleting content he doesn’t like, this behaving like an editor. In which case he has forfeited his immunities,
Georg says
Wow.
Walter Sieruk says
Is Facebook sick or evil or what ? With Facebook with its so called “community standards “Death threats ‘ are “all right”. Yet Truth expounding is not “all right.”
For example ,Facebook had banned me on 3/13 /18, for 29 days for violating their politically correct “Community standards” What follows is the essay that that Facebook to awful and they put me on this ban.
Those Muslim migrants who were allowed to enter Britain a along with the other countries of Western Europe with result in them not only being ungrateful but even worse yet many of those Muslim migrants becoming so very arrogant to the point that they became criminals . As in some of them engaged in rioting and even rapes of the European girls and women. In addition to this vile brutal behavior by the heinous Muslim who were kindly permitted to enter the nations of Europe to live, As the countries of ,for example France, Germany Sweden, Denmark etc. This unthankful Islamic spirit on the part of those lawless violent Muslims who immigrated to the countries of Europe may be explain, in part, by the fact that the Muslim fundamentalist group that even had the president of Egypt assassinated in the month of October of the year 1981 has a fifty –five booklet that is was written only for Muslims fundamentalists but was later discover by non-Muslims. This booklet’s title is THE NEGLECTED DUTY. One scholar, Johannes Jansen who had thoroughly investigated Islam and Islamic terrorism has even discover that those Muslims, who had entered Europe of behaved in violent and heinous ways, are actually action out what they view and a sacred individual duty of the jihad as by engaging in awful violent criminal action in non-Muslim lands . As Jansen revealed that jihad booklet of Islam, THE NEGLECTED DUTY “contains all the ideological material needed to justify the attacks of 9/11 or any other acts of terror committed to frighten non-Muslims. And he thinks the document explains the criminal behavior of suburban and center –city immigrant youngsters in many European cities; its author clearly ‘sees Islam as license to kill rob and commit arson.’ “ [1] Nevertheless, many of the apologists for Islam still have that blatant gall , in spite of all the facts of reality, to actually make the claim the Islam is a “peaceful religion.” What a totally false to make that Islam is “a peaceful religion “What Bull! A “peaceful religion” indeed.
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM by Ibn Warraq pages 308, 309.
Hilly says
Did Facebook already delete this “update?” When I went to the link in the article just now, this wording doesn’t appear on the page? Was the “update” done by a “rogue” Facebook employee? Or could the page have been hacked?
Hilly says
“UPDATE: Facebook Deletes Policy Allowing Violent Threats Against “Dangerous Individuals”
Social media giant backs down after backlash.”
Deleted, with no explanation given.
https://summit.news/2019/07/10/update-facebook-deletes-policy-allowing-violent-threats-against-dangerous-individuals/
Keys says
Heh, maybe Zuckerberg had a death threat made against him, a dangerous individual running a dangerous organization.
Oh, the arrogance !
Oh, the humanity !
SemiDave says
Perhaps the policy has been deleted ‘publicly’ but exists privately amongst Facebook ‘Community Standards’ thugs.
gravenimage says
Yes–I think they backed down. Speaking up *can* make a difference!
CRUSADER says
Why does Prabh babble as Prabh does, do you suppose?
So WEIRD !!!
So completely and entirely unnecessary!
gravenimage says
I have no idea what Prabh is hoping to accomplish here.
jarmanray says
Facebook seems to be working closely with Secretary General Guterres at the UN to advance Islam by stating, “Any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factor”. With a definition as broad as this, all speech could be labelled “hate.” He further stated, “Poisonous views are penetrating political debates and polluting the mainstream. Let’s never forget the lessons of the 1930s. Hate speech and hate crimes are direct threats to human rights…” He seems to have forgotten or ignored that Hitler and Göbbels had books that they found contrary to their agenda removed from libraries as well as private residences and burned them. To paraphrase Martin Niemöller’s famous words: First they came for the Jews, then they came for the gypsies and LGBT community, then they came for the Christians and now they have come for me but soon they will come for Mark Zuckerberg.
Walter Sieruk says
The heads of Facebook must have cogitation problems since they find “death threats” acceptable yet not so when posting the truth about September 11 2001, in which early this year Facebook put me on a ban for.
So here is what got Facebook so very upset
“Don’t let them fool you, the many apologists for Islam is will endeavor to set up a smokescreen to hide the reality of the truth about the violence and deadly essence of Islam by making the bogus claim that the al Qaeda operatives mass murderer on 9/11 were not real Muslims and that they were breaking the laws of the Qu ‘ran by their violence and deadly actions.” The apologists for Islam will further make the totally false claim that “Those terrorists on 9/11 were only criminals who hijacked the peaceful religion of Islam for Politics.” Those outrageously false claims are weak attempt of damage control for the image of Islam to the West. For the “holy book” of Islam the Qu ‘ran. For the Qu ‘ran instruct in Sura 9:111. Muslims who are engaging the jihad that “The believer’s fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain ,they kill and are killed “ That’s just what happened on September 11, 2001 the jihadists of al Qaeda “killed and were killed” in those 9/11 jihad attacks against both humankind and America. The Quran also teaches in Sura 9:123 to that jihad –minded Muslims behavior towards non-Muslims “let them find harshness in you…” Those Islamic attacks on 9/11 were indeed very “harsh.” As Sura 2:191 instructs “kill the disbeliever wherever you find them.” That’s a very strange kind of “peaceful religion” if there ever was one. Just to site one more out on many from the Qu ‘ran about the instruction of deadly violence is Sura 47:4. Which instructs “Whenever you encounter unbelievers strike off their heads until you make a great slaughter among them …” Let’s face it, using jet planes a missiles as those jihadist/ Muslims did of September 11, sure made a greater “slaughter among them” then sword can. Wake up West to the actual nature of Islam before it’s too late.”
James Lincoln says
Walter Sieruk,
Your Facebook post correctly stated the truth regarding September 11, 2001.
The fact that you were banned from Facebook for this post says absolutely everything.
Keep up the fight.
joanofark06 says
“using jet planes a missiles as those jihadist/ Muslims did of September 11,”
I’m just gonna ignore that I read that, and say, “no comment”. Some people just have their own mind made up, on how certain things happen! Ooops, I said no comment, silly me….
Rarely says
It is very hard to believe that this truly is Facebook’s policy. It probably requires further investigation.
gravenimage says
We’ll all be breathlessly awaiting the results of Rarely’s in-depth investigation…
CRUSADER says
Rarely do we encounter such intelligence in the universe!
joanofark06 says
lol…I’m laughin’!
Walter Sieruk says
Only a few day after the second anniversary of the jihad/ISIS mass murder attacks on Paris France. Face book banned me to posting the following …
“Those vicious and murderous Islamic terror attacks in the city of Paris , on July 14 , 2015, is because of those jihad-minded Muslim males who are so extremely deluded and irrational because they really believed in the nonsensical , strange and far –fetched doctrine contained in the Koran, of sex-filled paradise with black eye- houris, virgins, in it for the male Muslim who dies as a “martyr” for the cause of Islam fighting in the jihad. As, this bizarre Islamic doctrine of a houris -filled place is found in the Koran in, for example, 4:54. 55:56. 78:31. So this odd and outlandish Koranic doctrine inspired many young Muslims males to commit many horrendous, ruthless, heartless and murderous actions of jihad violence. Those vicious jihadists’ massacres that occurred in Paris was most wicked and hideous. That extreme deadly evil caused by those jihadist/Muslims with their firm but blind unquestioning belief in the weird and false doctrine from the Koran of such a houris, filled paradise that had the outcome of mass murder and chaos in the city of Paris. This is a strong reminder of the wise statement written by the French philosopher, Voltaire, who wrote “As long as men continue to believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.”
Nevertheless Facebook has deemed jihadist “death threats to be “acceptable.”
Bella says
This just sounds like a quicker way of getting right wing media and people off of facebook so that anyone who logs in will only see leftist news and leftist views. This is a very dangerous move by facebook, very.
WPM says
Facebook has now become Sharia complaint website in 2019 ready and agreeing to post Jihadist violently threating non-believers who dare to speak out about the violent horror of Jihad. Shutting down, censoring ,banning any discussion on what is wrong with Islam.
Walter Sieruk says
Just one more , meaning just one more example of an essay Facebook had ,a few month ago, along with another such essay banned me for posting . Nevertheless Facebook chief’s now feel “that ‘death threats” are OK..
So here is one of my other essays that offended Facebook.
“Many jihadists have the Islamic agenda and quest to conquer the nations of the West for Islam. Either “by hook or by crook” as in by engaging in the stealth jihad or in the violent and deadly “jihad of the sword” As seen in this recent jihad attack in Germany which harmed twelve people. Likewise part of all this in is by the Muslim infiltration of the Western countries which is being accomplished by the great number of Muslim migrants who are entering the Western nations.
As a Former Muslim had revealed in his book when he wrote that “there has been large –scale immigration into the West, from Islamic nations…of Muslims who are implacably hostile to the West, have no desire to learn why the West became so rich and tolerant , and certainly have no desire to assimilate. They feel no gratitude of allegiance to their Western host nations; their only obligations are to fellow Muslims.”
The author further clarifies by adding. “The mere presence of so many Muslims in the West had affected the domestic and international behavior of governments, whose foreign policy is dominated by fear of offending their Muslim population ready to riot on the slightest pretext. Those unassimilated Muslims are committed to introducing Islamic laws in the West. , and they are able to do so cleverly exploiting the freedoms created over the centuries by the infidels.” [1]
As for that above statement that the “Muslim population [is] ready to riot on the slightest pretext…” This is valid evidence that the old saying is true .Which is that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.”
On this very important subject another scholar in his book informs the reader that “Islamic involvement in the political process is much more advanced in Europe than in the United States.” and he further makes it known that “Of all the continents of the world, Europe is probably the number one target by Muslim strategists who are seeking world dominance.” [2]
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM by Ibn Warraq, page 354
[2] HOW ISLAM PLANS TO CHANCE THE WORLD by William Wagner , pages 176, 195.”
garbut says
Regardless of Facebook allowing death threats or incitements to violence….it is still an offence in the UK, under the Serious Crimes Act, for any person to encourage an act of violence against any other person, irrespective of whether the threat is verbal, electronic etc. The penalty for inciting the commission of an offence that is not in fact committed is 10 years imprisonment if the maximum penalty for the offence is imprisonment for life and in other cases up to half the maximum penalty of the primary offence. I’m pretty sure though, that the corrupt UK police will only selectively enforce that law depending on which side of the politically correct fence that the offender is on.
gravenimage says
This is illegal in the US, as well–and most of the rest of the civilized world. That doesn’t mean there will be any prosecution of this, though.
WPM says
Moslems get a free ride to say what that want when they want ,they are the special pets of the libtards who run the MSM in the west. The media including face book do not hold them to the same standards as non-Moslem adults .They treat them as angry harmless children who can be appeased to change their violent behavior by caving in to their demands of posting violent threats on facebook. Facebook, stance is let them have there temper tantrums on line ,the trouble is they are violent adults who crave power through threats of violence and performing violence .
gravenimage says
All too often true.
Wellington says
What I call Farcebook is an enabler of evil. This is the long and short of it.
Wellington says
Addendum: Time is way overdue for all decent persons who have a Facebook account to cease having a Facebook account. Sorry, no excuses.
CRUSADER says
Never had one.
I’m thankful.
gravenimage says
I set one up for “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day”, but never used it after thatn.
gravenimage says
after that.
Prabh says
https://youtu.be/swfr764GFvM
Better to play this than expect justice from noahide kangaroo courts of kanada, fullstop.
Pr101
Prabh says
Or any court of corrupt kaljewg court rooted in dialectical materialism, this includes corrupted beloved bharat: rip India
China quit Aryavartasthan and chinki Bantu criminalz quit inchoate Anglosphere including Tibet.
Pr 108
gravenimage says
Prabh wrote:
https://youtu.be/swfr764GFvM
……………………….
This is a Muslim song calling for the destruction of Israel.
I had thought that Prabh was merely Islamophilic–but posts there from a Prabh Rangi–likely the poster above–has him screaming “inshallah masallah” over the genocide of the Jews.
That same poster chillingly writes on that thread, “Jews ought to be barred from the professions, by law, full-stop.”
More:
Better to play this than expect justice from noahide kangaroo courts of kanada, fullstop.
Pr101
……………………….
This has nothing to do with Canada, nor with “noahide” laws, of course.
More:
Or any court of corrupt kaljewg court rooted in dialectical materialism, this includes corrupted beloved bharat: rip India
China quit Aryavartasthan and chinki Bantu criminalz quit inchoate Anglosphere including Tibet.
……………………….
Prabh also hates the Chinese–not because of Maoist Communism, which would be rational, but on racial grounds. Sick stuff.
CRUSADER says
Better to just dismiss Prabh.
Angemon says
Calls for violence are a crime in pretty much any Western nation. Can’t say I’m surprised though – the sort of censorship the left wants ends up biting them in the ass so it was only a matter of time to go from “death threats are bad” to “death threats are bad except if they’re against the people I don’t like”. In any case, who are the members responsible for the “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy”?
gravenimage says
+1
Huh!?! says
I have been considering dropping FB for sometime. Consideration over. I know what part of my weekend will be.
I suspect since I post here I must be a dangerous, hate monger, racist, phobic flavor of the month person. Oh by the way, I do support the Constitution of the U.S. I am beyond evil,
This is major George Orwell 1984 stuff. Cannot extreme lawsuits be brought down on FB?
Prabh says
InchoateAnglosphericHindosthaniDoublespeakPlusOrwellianPoliticalCorrectnessofFakeMutliculturalism equals narakasthan- temporary hinduHell prior to transmigration. Deliberately misspelled multicultural: fugli matriarchy of semitic creeds cannot coexist with six Aryan religions.
To wit: Jain, RigVedicHinduismReligion,Zarathustran Parsi path GautamBudh religion, Equalitarian humanitarian Sikhi, and whatever is State religion of IranZamin, Prestige Aryan Homeland all Dharmik religions r honour bound to protect as our very own salafi?own. SufiShiiteSunniFanatix: why religion zealot so unloved? Unfair. Note I hate modest dress. Jaan of Beloved Bharat is in Persia and, unsurprisingly viceversa: india Iran r close friends, neighbours and most importantly, Eternal Lovers: thnx Mother Russia!
I love afpak region, lands of stunningly supernal beauty and bliss: simply peerless non~pareil and the best by any standard of measurement. This includes not just geography but our fully divine sages,saints, seers, Kings( iow Rajah Rani)and Gods. JewnitedUnited states u will rue the day u ever dared set foot upon a Zarathustran territory. Hezbollah is Aryan. Note for Aryan major topic of discussion is death, big and little as per FrenchieExpression petitMort referring to peak intimate pleasure attainment as per Madrasi Osho. Note Aryavartasthan idealogy of Tehran is different from darling Osho. More like Esoteric Hitlerism. Also note please Eastern Earth has fondness for benevolent dictators and good kind just monarchs. We value duty, obligation and privilege attained thru birthright instead of hollow paper rights of farce of Republic that is abortionist USA. Eg caste system is a Commonwealth of Aryavartasthan. Our Civilization state goes from “white to black nonnegro nonchinky” wrt acquaintance who bluntly summarized india in three words, namely white to black.
VandeMatarm I like matar panir but I know not one word of bengali and nonegotistically, proud of it. For I learn French language of international diplomacy and love.
Love conquers all as per Chaucer Canterbury tales.
I like word problem approach to geopolitics. Third eye most important.
Excuse typo(s)svp note religions mentioned r not born sinners and all hate the nterest of malthusmisery..
VielenDanks
pr108
gravenimage says
Prabh wrote:
InchoateAnglosphericHindosthaniDoublespeakPlusOrwellianPoliticalCorrectnessofFakeMutliculturalism equals narakasthan- temporary hinduHell prior to transmigration. Deliberately misspelled multicultural: fugli matriarchy of semitic creeds cannot coexist with six Aryan religions.
………………………….
The frequently incoherent Prabh has said that sort of thing before–that Judaism and Christianity–both peaceful creeds–are no different from the savagery of Islam.
He has also condemned Judaism and Christianity for allowing women–including older women–a public role in society. This is what he means by “fugli matriarchy”. Like Muslims, he wants women hidden away.
More:
To wit: Jain, RigVedicHinduismReligion,Zarathustran Parsi path GautamBudh religion, Equalitarian humanitarian Sikhi, and whatever is State religion of IranZamin, Prestige Aryan Homeland all Dharmik religions r honour bound to protect as our very own salafi?own.
………………………….
Of course, the state religion of Iran is Islam–it is a Shari’ah state. Islam is not a Dharmic religion, as he often pretends. And Salafists are among the most fanatic of Muslims.
More:
SufiShiiteSunniFanatix: why religion zealot so unloved? Unfair. Note I hate modest dress. Jaan of Beloved Bharat is in Persia and, unsurprisingly viceversa: india Iran r close friends, neighbours and most importantly, Eternal Lovers: thnx Mother Russia!
………………………….
Muslims regularly target non-Muslim Indians–Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Christians, Buddhists–in violent Jihad, Iran is no friend of India’s.
More:
I love afpak region, lands of stunningly supernal beauty and bliss: simply peerless non~pareil and the best by any standard of measurement. This includes not just geography but our fully divine sages,saints, seers, Kings( iow Rajah Rani)and Gods.
………………………….
Prabh conveniently ignores the fact that Afghanistan and Pakistan were invaded and overrun with Muslim savages centuries ago–claiming that these Shari’ah hell holes are “the best by any standard of measurement” because of their their long gone Hindu or Buddhist pasts makes no sense.
More:
JewnitedUnited states u will rue the day u ever dared set foot upon a Zarathustran territory.
………………………….
This antisemitic rant is threatening the United States for having dared defended against Jihad. Prabh does this quite frequently.
More:
Hezbollah is Aryan. Note for Aryan major topic of discussion is death, big and little as per FrenchieExpression petitMort referring to peak intimate pleasure attainment as per Madrasi Osho. Note Aryavartasthan idealogy of Tehran is different from darling Osho. More like Esoteric Hitlerism.
………………………….
More confused insanity. Of course, Hezb’allah is the Party of Allah–it is mainstream Islam. Their major goal is the destruction of Israel, which Prabh seems fine with. Of course they talk about death–this is not a symbolic discussion of Tantric sex; it is a literal reference to genocide of the Jews. He also appears to be a fan of the Nazis from previous posts. He is big on “racial purity”.
More:
Also note please Eastern Earth has fondness for benevolent dictators and good kind just monarchs. We value duty, obligation and privilege attained thru birthright instead of hollow paper rights of farce of Republic that is abortionist USA.
………………………….
He has said how much he is for dictatorship, and has expressed his hatred of freedom–especially for women.
More:
Eg caste system is a Commonwealth of Aryavartasthan. Our Civilization state goes from “white to black nonnegro nonchinky” wrt acquaintance who bluntly summarized india in three words, namely white to black.
………………………….
He has done this many times before, as well–said that people should be discriminated against based on race, and is lobbying for a return of the oppressive caste system.
He has hence lauded the vicious Jihadist Anjem Chaudary, claiming that his calls for Jihad are intended (somehow) to protect the “white race’, even when he is targeting white Britons. Of course, this is not his goal at all.
More:
VandeMatarm I like matar panir but I know not one word of bengali and nonegotistically, proud of it. For I learn French language of international diplomacy and love.
Love conquers all as per Chaucer Canterbury tales.
………………………….
Not a lot of love in his antisemitism, racism, and apologia for Jihad, above.
Wellington says
Great rebuttal. Great post gravenimage. Prabh is the kind of “person” that makes me think Homo erectus somehow did survive after all.
gravenimage says
I know how you feel, Wellington. By the way, I believe that Prabh used to post here as pnr, and was banned some time ago.
CRUSADER says
Rather a waste of time, this Prabh is.
Ecosse1314 says
Thank you for your translation. I couldn’t understand any of his gibberish
Steve Meikle says
Zuckerberg is showing here that power corrupts. Who does this contemptible little man think he is?
Abraham Fox says
The only way to deal with Zuckerberg is to break up his organization. The marketplace can deal with it but time is a-fleeting and his influence is spreading faster than the numbers leaving Facebook.
gravenimage says
As bad as Facebook is, having the company seized and broken up by the government is not apt to make things better.
Glen says
I have had death threats directed at me, no problem for FB. A couple years ago, I received a death threat, and they included my wife, my children, and my grandchildren. Unlike the others, I took this as a credible threat and felt I had not right to endanger the rest of my family. Again, they did not violate FB community standards. The threat was credible enough that I would have killed anyone near me wearing their t-shirt.
I imagine they would have included my parents if they had thought they were alive, they are and in their 90s.
CRUSADER says
CAMPUS FREE SPEECH >
Robby Soave’s new book,
“Panic Attack: Young Radicals in the Age of Trump….” :
Campus free speech battles.
Intersectionality-fueled infighting.
Cancel culture.
ROBBY SOAVE
http://www.Reason.com
The book pulls together several story threads I’ve covered here at Reason for the past five years: growing hostility toward free speech among progressive activists; the dramatic collapse of due process rights on college campuses during the Obama years; where intersectionality comes from, and why it’s tearing the left apart; the rise of cancel culture and social media mobs; the goals and tactics of groups like antifa, fourth-wave feminism, and the Democratic Socialists of America; and the emergence of the alt-right, a movement committed to white nationalism and identity politics.
The New York Post surveyed my book (and interviewed me) for the Saturday edition, warning that “the Zillennials—leftist millennial and Generation Z activists—continue to fuel the anti-Trump resistance. And they just might get him re-elected in 2020.”
An excerpt from Chapter One of my book is available here, and in the July 2019 issue of Reason.
I also sat down with Reason’s Zach Weissmueller to talk about the book. You can watch that here:
Last week, I appeared on the Rubin Report with Dave Rubin. That video is here:
You can also catch me on Kennedy’s show here, and Tucker Carlson’s show here.
https://reason.com/2019/06/17/robby-soaves-new-book-panic-attack-young-radicals-in-the-age-of-trump-hits-stores-tomorrow/
Barb says
One day the Facebook owners will stand face to face with the GOD of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – the ONE TRUE LIVING GOD and will be judged for their reckless and wicked behavior!
The only dangerous individuals I know are those who believe in Ideologies like Islam which commands it’s followers to hate infidels – and other Godless Ideologies such as Socialism, Communism, Fascism, LGBT that disobey GOD’S MORALS and values!
Paul Jacques says
I just read through the community standards and found nothing like described in this article. Is it a Europe community standards? Or Facebook as a whole?
aDhimmiSaysWhat? says
Robert,
Not to nitpick, but I clicked on the Facebook Community Standards link that you listed, and it does not match your screenshot. I can’t find anywhere in the link that states ‘(unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy)….
ciudadanocr says
Facebook is getting very aggressive against criticism of islam. Today facebook locked me out of my account for posting a link to the original article in the JP.
Allan white says
Come on there is no way that that is legal.
gravenimage says
Facebook adopts new policy allowing death threats against “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations”
…………………………
This is f*cking *insane*.
Firstly, who decides what individuals and organizations are “dangerous”?
Then, isn’t threatening violence–especially murder–*illegal* in civilized nations?
aDhimmiSaysWhat? says
Gravenimage,
Please see my comment above. Click on that link. There’s nothing there that matches the screenshot… Is this just me?
gravenimage says
Thanks, aDhimmiSaysWhat?. You are right.
Has Facebook changed their policy again, after complaints? I do not agree with Paul Joseph Watson on every matter, but I doubt that he was making this up. I’ll see if I can find any more information.
aDhimmiSaysWhat? says
I only bring this up because I have the utmost respect for Robert Spencer and the material he posts here. He certainly has more journalistic integrity than the MSM. I am very inclined to think that either 1) like you said, Facebook DID in fact at one time have this language as part of their community standards, or 2) this is just a mistake.
Hilly says
aDhimmiSaysWhat and grave image:
Yes, it was there, but it was deleted yesterday (Wednesday) with no explanation given. See my two replies, above.
Deleting that “update” without an explanation is even more concerning. The public deserves to know the full story behind this.
Hilly says
I don’t seem to be able to add a reply to my own earlier reply here, so I will have to add it this way.
The Update has been now been updated, with Facebook’s “explanation.” https://summit.news/2019/07/10/update-facebook-deletes-policy-allowing-violent-threats-against-dangerous-individuals/
“Following a backlash, Facebook has completely deleted the section that allowed violence to be incited against “dangerous individuals”.
They now claim their language was “imprecise,” which is the Orwellian understatement of the century.”
From Facebook: “The language we previously used to describe our policies against violence and incitement was imprecise. We have since replaced it to more clearly explain the policy and underlying rationale.”
gravenimage says
Thank you, Hilly. This is what I thought had happened.
R Cole says
Surreal!!
Someone must have reminded Facebook, they were not actually a country!!
We know former Muslims are already being banned on FB, and labeled “dangerous individuals” for talking about their non-Islamic faith to Muslims. Moderate Muslims who speak out, are called infidels, even “islamophobes” would also be considered “dangerous individuals” on FB.
The Facebook rule – now removed – certainly looked like a serious breakdown in civility. It seemed to be saying, we don’t want people we disagree with on our site… all two billion of them. And to demonstrate this, we will allow our members to make open threats targeting these banned individuals, from our platform.
This new addition to FB guidelines. can’t be blamed on an algorithm problem. Someone wrote that. because that’s what many people at Facebook believe. And that’s what made this terrifying.
It’s like the mind of a megalomaniac over at FB, and it’s dangerous.
Lydia Church says
Yes Robert, it moves quickly at this point.
People always think “but, but…. I have this and that right guaranteed in the Constitution, or some other document, so this can’t happen,” and then it happens anyway. The rest is only on paper and if it is not honored, that is as good as thin air. If it were any guarantee, would we be seeing things happen like to Andy Ngo, as the violent thugs go free, and journalists are terrified, Paul Joseph Watson has his life threatened for disagreeing with a private company and leftist followers of theirs and it’s okay? Tommy is locked up in the UK while rape gangs go free, jihadists get ‘compensation’ in France but not their victims, and the hero in the UK who helped STOP a terrorist group is put on the watch list but not the jihadists running around free or even invited back in? (see infowars too) Justice is as perverted as can be as the whole world goes mad, what is on paper is worthless at this point. Where is freedom of speech and of the press and all the other rights and liberties? That is the reality. The tyranny is here folks.
CRUSADER says
Thank Goodness there is the ETERNAL Reality that awaits.
+ + +
joanofark06 says
MAN, I sure cannot WAIT for the day…when the “two billion” people (mentioned in this article), that use Facebook,. WAKE UP, and STOP using this “platform”!! So many today, have never used it, or have used it, and left it, for their own reasons, and more still that WILL leave it, when they realize how evil this thing IS!
I’d laugh and celebrate, if their stock, just DIED!
Nice article, to be archived into my “Social Media” folder…thanks Mr. Spencer!
Anton Savarese says
History is re-pleat with this sort of human failure. The aftermath is always the same. This does not end well..
Bill says
It is getting worse everywhere. The media is all in, I mean all in, on its mission to destroy conservative thought and opinion and to literally destroy those people who harbor such opinions. The pace is accelerating.
nabi ZK (pbum) says
I Was challenged on this by my daughter who said she would believe it if I could show her the policy at FB. I went there and found almost the exact statement. But the words “(unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy)” appeared nowhere.
Naildriver says
Ostensibly the presumption is from fb, that to spew hate against a ‘hate’ group’, merely reflects an intuitive acceptable human response to ‘hate’.
What fb fails to understand is its own hypocrisy; and fanaticism for a Leftist political position.
I too have been sidelined a few time upon fb for completely honest and true comments they deemed ‘hate’ speech regarding discussions of Islam.
This further acceptance of threat against those who don’t share their opinions is potentially criminal, and could also be regarded incitement as well. I doubt though we’ll see much litigation from our currently liberal governing authorities.
UNCLE VLADDI says
AH, THE RENOWNED TOLERANCE OF LIBSLAM!
Horseman says
This crap with these tech companies gets more ridiculous by-the-day.
No Muzzies Here says
No doubt Zuckerberg sees Muslims as a growing, safe and secure source of revenue. The number of Muslims is expanding. They already use Facebook to spread their message of violence and hate. He wants more of them on Facebook.
He isn’t bothered at all by the fact that innocent people are hurt as a result of his actions.
Barb says
President Trump and his Government should have Facebook publicly recognized as a terrorist group – the Facebook owners have overstepped their place in society – they are neither elected representatives nor have they the right to make such determinations!
Chuck says
***UPDATE: Facebook has deleted its new policy that allowed violent threats against “dangerous individuals” after a backlash.***
(https://summit.news/2019/07/09/facebook-issues-new-policy-saying-its-acceptable-to-issue-death-threats-against-me/)
Fritz says
We will not forget, Facebook. We will not.
Huh!?! says
Sooo….FB deleted “the policy.” They may have deleted the post, but I do not believe FB and MZuck will delete the intent or a process involving this practice. This will just move into the shadows.