Germany has been savaged by Muslim migration, from sex assaults and jihad attacks to a surge in Islamic antisemitism recognized by even by globalist Angela Merkel. The islamization of Germany and other countries in the EU was through a process known as the hijrah. As explained by Robert Spencer…
Hijrah, or jihad by emigration, is, according to Islamic tradition, the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE. It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers. Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.
A critical point to accept is the process of jihad did not begin with colonialism or any other unfortunate modern act. It is a 1400 year old process. What is new however is the level of infiltration and successes of the jihad on Western soil. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is a key player in the jihad process, working stealthily toward sharia expansion. For example, a big issue today is Muslim immigration. Concerns about it have given rise to the Populist movement. MB members have managed to fool Westerners into believing that Muslim migration is harmless, and the ‘kind‘ thing to do is to help refugees and people in need. But Westerners have long helped refugees in need while also protecting its borders and expecting that immigration be a two-way street. The deceptive MB however has blurred lines of reasoning and used the “Islamophobia” narrative to weaken the will and resolve of Westerners; falsely painting Westerners who oppose open-door immigration to be discriminatory against all immigrants. As a result, few Westerners are willing to discuss the harm of Islamization of which should be opposed as a duty to ones free country.
The MB’s aggressiveness in promoting a victimology subterfuge under the banner of “Islamophobia” and “racism“, has also effectively deceived Westerners into believing that violence has nothing to do with Islam, even with overwhelming global evidence that proves otherwise. The Muslim Brotherhood operates in the West as stealth jihadists while providing cover for their violent jihadi counterparts.
One of the unlikely countries to highlight the modus operandi of the MB is globalist Germany, but yet German intelligence is doing just that. In a groundbreaking turn, the Muslim Brotherhood is being monitored in Germany as dangerous to democracy, despite its non-violent ‘appearance’.
“the Muslim Brotherhood had been using the contrast between their own group and violent Islamist groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS) as a way to suggest themselves as a non-problematic alternative”, and “their influence could endanger social peace and harmony.”
The MB operates the same in all Western countries….
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
By now, this process should be obvious to all Western leaders and citizens in observing the special status that mainstream Muslim lobbies seek everywhere for Muslims over adherents of other religions; and the rigid insistence of these lobbies that the word “Islamophobia” be embraced and recognized. They reject use of the term “anti-Muslim bigotry” to replace “islamophobia” in every anti-discrimination drive because their end goal is not about discrimination. It is about achieving Islamic dominance through Western subjugation. The term “anti-Muslim bigotry” places Muslims as equals with all groups, which is not the goal of the Muslim Brotherhood. MB-connected lobbies seek retribution against anyone who merely identifies the inherent supremacy of the sharia, and the use of jihad violence toward establishing and maintaining its tenets. A terror has now seized Westerners over being called “Islamophobic” and the thought of facing the dreadful “Islamophobia” brigade. Westerners are not “Islamophobic” or anti-Muslim. They are prudently concerned about free speech and the obvious evidence of the human rights abuses inflicted upon infidels, apostates, gays and women in the name of Islam which is not the exception but the rule.
For a complete understanding of the goals and operations of the Muslim Brotherhood everywhere, click HERE.
According to the German Federal Office For The Protection of the Constitution (BfV), the Muslim Brotherhood is “a foreign-based organisation with a political Islamist viewpoint gaining such influence could endanger social peace and harmony.” The BfV report also warns that the MB has “an agenda in partial conflict with constitutional values” and also “suggested public awareness and communications campaigns…. as an effective precaution against social penetration efforts by the Muslim Brotherhood and other legal Islamist groups.” In truth, the MB’s agenda is in full conflict with Western constitutional values, but the BfV report is an encouraging start.
“Terrorism affairs expert, journalist Axel Spilcker” wrote about the Muslim Brotherhood’s threat in Germany and he quoted “Burkhard Freier, head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia, as saying that the Islamic Community of Germany, and organizations that are working with it, are ultimately seeking to establish a state based on Sharia law…. He, therefore, estimated that the Brotherhood’s threat to Germany on the medium-term was greater than other extremist groups, such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.”
Any effort against the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany and elsewhere must begin with complete rejection of the word “Islamophobia” as the MB’s primary tool of infiltration is fear and the dismantling of Western free speech which exposes them and the sharia agenda.
Kudos to the German Federal Office For The Protection of the Constitution for its report. Now, political will and counter-measures need to follow.
“Muslim Brotherhood dangerous for social peace – German intelligence”, Ahval News, July 4, 2019:
Germany’s domestic intelligence agency 2018 report for the North Rhine-Westphalia state said the Muslim Brotherhood was being closely monitored by Germany due to dangers the report said legal, non-violent Islamist groups posed to the country’s democracy, German state-run Deutsche Welle Turkish reported on Wednesday.
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution’s (BfV) report said legal Islamist groups were working to control a large portion of the population and called said groups non-violent but extremist.
The report said the Muslim Brotherhood, a movement originally from Egpyt, could transform into a representative for the interests of Muslims in the eyes of the public and the state, and that the group’s religious ideology could potentially spread among Muslims in North Rhine-Westphalia and Germany at large.
According to the BfV, a foreign-based organisation with a political Islamist viewpoint gaining such influence could endanger social peace and harmony.
The report said the Muslim Brotherhood had an agenda in partial conflict with constitutional values, without providing details on this agenda. The report also suggested public awareness and communications campaigns by the agency as an effective precaution against social penetration efforts by the Muslim Brotherhood and other legal Islamist groups.
Muslim Brotherhood members and sympathisers are said to be well educated and to work in respected positions, with good connections in Germany and internationally.
The report said the Muslim Brotherhood had been using the contrast between their own group and violent Islamist groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS) as a way to suggest themselves as a non-problematic alternative, and had presented themselves as an interlocutor for state officials and non-governmental organisations.
The diversity of cultural backgrounds, theological and ideological leanings, social references and organisation structures among the legal Islamist groups was underlined in the report, which went on to suggest that these variations constituted a wide array from the Muslim Brotherhood to pro-Iranian regime groups, to the Felicity Party (SP) represented in the Turkish parliament, to several political Salafist currents.
According to the BfV report, non-violent legal Islamist groups “make ISIS look innocent” as they are in contact with all sections of society and have the potential to instate their own members at key positions in the future.
The Muslim Brotherhood has an influence over the Central Council of Muslims in Germany (ZMD), said the report, and the group has no qualms about collaborating with Cologne-based Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DİTİB)……