Germany has been savaged by Muslim migration, from sex assaults and jihad attacks to a surge in Islamic antisemitism recognized by even by globalist Angela Merkel. The islamization of Germany and other countries in the EU was through a process known as the hijrah. As explained by Robert Spencer…
Hijrah, or jihad by emigration, is, according to Islamic tradition, the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE. It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers. Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.
A critical point to accept is the process of jihad did not begin with colonialism or any other unfortunate modern act. It is a 1400 year old process. What is new however is the level of infiltration and successes of the jihad on Western soil. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is a key player in the jihad process, working stealthily toward sharia expansion. For example, a big issue today is Muslim immigration. Concerns about it have given rise to the Populist movement. MB members have managed to fool Westerners into believing that Muslim migration is harmless, and the ‘kind‘ thing to do is to help refugees and people in need. But Westerners have long helped refugees in need while also protecting its borders and expecting that immigration be a two-way street. The deceptive MB however has blurred lines of reasoning and used the “Islamophobia” narrative to weaken the will and resolve of Westerners; falsely painting Westerners who oppose open-door immigration to be discriminatory against all immigrants. As a result, few Westerners are willing to discuss the harm of Islamization of which should be opposed as a duty to ones free country.
The MB’s aggressiveness in promoting a victimology subterfuge under the banner of “Islamophobia” and “racism“, has also effectively deceived Westerners into believing that violence has nothing to do with Islam, even with overwhelming global evidence that proves otherwise. The Muslim Brotherhood operates in the West as stealth jihadists while providing cover for their violent jihadi counterparts.
One of the unlikely countries to highlight the modus operandi of the MB is globalist Germany, but yet German intelligence is doing just that. In a groundbreaking turn, the Muslim Brotherhood is being monitored in Germany as dangerous to democracy, despite its non-violent ‘appearance’.
“the Muslim Brotherhood had been using the contrast between their own group and violent Islamist groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS) as a way to suggest themselves as a non-problematic alternative”, and “their influence could endanger social peace and harmony.”
The MB operates the same in all Western countries….
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
By now, this process should be obvious to all Western leaders and citizens in observing the special status that mainstream Muslim lobbies seek everywhere for Muslims over adherents of other religions; and the rigid insistence of these lobbies that the word “Islamophobia” be embraced and recognized. They reject use of the term “anti-Muslim bigotry” to replace “islamophobia” in every anti-discrimination drive because their end goal is not about discrimination. It is about achieving Islamic dominance through Western subjugation. The term “anti-Muslim bigotry” places Muslims as equals with all groups, which is not the goal of the Muslim Brotherhood. MB-connected lobbies seek retribution against anyone who merely identifies the inherent supremacy of the sharia, and the use of jihad violence toward establishing and maintaining its tenets. A terror has now seized Westerners over being called “Islamophobic” and the thought of facing the dreadful “Islamophobia” brigade. Westerners are not “Islamophobic” or anti-Muslim. They are prudently concerned about free speech and the obvious evidence of the human rights abuses inflicted upon infidels, apostates, gays and women in the name of Islam which is not the exception but the rule.
For a complete understanding of the goals and operations of the Muslim Brotherhood everywhere, click HERE.
According to the German Federal Office For The Protection of the Constitution (BfV), the Muslim Brotherhood is “a foreign-based organisation with a political Islamist viewpoint gaining such influence could endanger social peace and harmony.” The BfV report also warns that the MB has “an agenda in partial conflict with constitutional values” and also “suggested public awareness and communications campaigns…. as an effective precaution against social penetration efforts by the Muslim Brotherhood and other legal Islamist groups.” In truth, the MB’s agenda is in full conflict with Western constitutional values, but the BfV report is an encouraging start.
“Terrorism affairs expert, journalist Axel Spilcker” wrote about the Muslim Brotherhood’s threat in Germany and he quoted “Burkhard Freier, head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia, as saying that the Islamic Community of Germany, and organizations that are working with it, are ultimately seeking to establish a state based on Sharia law…. He, therefore, estimated that the Brotherhood’s threat to Germany on the medium-term was greater than other extremist groups, such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.”
Any effort against the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany and elsewhere must begin with complete rejection of the word “Islamophobia” as the MB’s primary tool of infiltration is fear and the dismantling of Western free speech which exposes them and the sharia agenda.
Kudos to the German Federal Office For The Protection of the Constitution for its report. Now, political will and counter-measures need to follow.
“Muslim Brotherhood dangerous for social peace – German intelligence”, Ahval News, July 4, 2019:
Germany’s domestic intelligence agency 2018 report for the North Rhine-Westphalia state said the Muslim Brotherhood was being closely monitored by Germany due to dangers the report said legal, non-violent Islamist groups posed to the country’s democracy, German state-run Deutsche Welle Turkish reported on Wednesday.
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution’s (BfV) report said legal Islamist groups were working to control a large portion of the population and called said groups non-violent but extremist.
The report said the Muslim Brotherhood, a movement originally from Egpyt, could transform into a representative for the interests of Muslims in the eyes of the public and the state, and that the group’s religious ideology could potentially spread among Muslims in North Rhine-Westphalia and Germany at large.
According to the BfV, a foreign-based organisation with a political Islamist viewpoint gaining such influence could endanger social peace and harmony.
The report said the Muslim Brotherhood had an agenda in partial conflict with constitutional values, without providing details on this agenda. The report also suggested public awareness and communications campaigns by the agency as an effective precaution against social penetration efforts by the Muslim Brotherhood and other legal Islamist groups.
Muslim Brotherhood members and sympathisers are said to be well educated and to work in respected positions, with good connections in Germany and internationally.
The report said the Muslim Brotherhood had been using the contrast between their own group and violent Islamist groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS) as a way to suggest themselves as a non-problematic alternative, and had presented themselves as an interlocutor for state officials and non-governmental organisations.
The diversity of cultural backgrounds, theological and ideological leanings, social references and organisation structures among the legal Islamist groups was underlined in the report, which went on to suggest that these variations constituted a wide array from the Muslim Brotherhood to pro-Iranian regime groups, to the Felicity Party (SP) represented in the Turkish parliament, to several political Salafist currents.
According to the BfV report, non-violent legal Islamist groups “make ISIS look innocent” as they are in contact with all sections of society and have the potential to instate their own members at key positions in the future.
The Muslim Brotherhood has an influence over the Central Council of Muslims in Germany (ZMD), said the report, and the group has no qualms about collaborating with Cologne-based Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DİTİB)……
eduardo odraude says
Thanks to Christine Douglass-Williams for this bit of hope.
Antony1977 says
Unfortunately, it’s only “a bit of hope”. And even if it comes true it’s just a bit of moving in the right direction while the other direction is moving way faster.
mortimer says
Good news! A few people in Germany are not INSANE … “Muslim Brotherhood dangerous for social peace – German intelligence”.
But will the LEADERS of the country listen to this well-reasoned warning???
gravenimage says
Don’t preach surrender here.
Rufolino says
I don’t see “surrender” being preached, I see realism.
gravenimage says
Rufolino, some of us here actually believe that it is possible to defend our civilized societies from the threat of Islam, and we don’t plan on giving up.
Sherry says
It is frightening to see so many Infidels who are oblivious to the dangers of Islam. So called “moderates” are convincing them that the majority of Muslims aren’t believers in violence within Islam. Not true…they are deceiving the ignorant. If the Quran and Sharia Law is what they abide by better be warned that you are gullible if you believe they aren’t dangerous.
Antony1977 says
Actually, even being a rebelious person I myself like “opened my eyes” just resently. I’m 42 years old and only about two years of my recent life I do start to understand what is going on, what has been going on for hundreds of years. I’ve never heard of Reconquista, of violent verses of Qur’an, of the constant conflicts between one religion and ALL others, etc earlier. But I repeat – I’m a rebelious person. What about others? This “silence mode” of the whole world is at least strange…
CRUSADER says
Wow. It used to be “don’t trust anyone over age of 30″….
Then it became “don’t trust any millennial under the age of 30″….
James Lincoln says
Antony1977 says,
Welcome to the fight.
Don’t feel too bad, at one time most folks at Jihad Watch knew very little about Islam…
gravenimage says
Yes–this is true of all of us if you go back far enough.
Antony1977 says
Thank you. Now I see this is common practice or something.
ntesdorf says
The Germans are a bit sliow on the uptake, but eventually even they have noticed something peculiar to Islam.
Wellington says
Never to be forgotten is that Barack Obama thought the Muslim Brotherhood was just dandy.
CRUSADER says
Obama:
Muslim Call to Prayer One of the Prettiest Sounds on Earth…
https://humanevents.com/2010/08/19/obama-muslim-call-to-prayer-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
“I was a little Jakarta street kid,” he said in a wide-ranging interview in his office (excerpts are on my blog, http://www.nytimes.com/ontheground). He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school, but a president is less likely to stereotype Muslims as fanatics — and more likely to be aware of their nationalism — if he once studied the Koran with them.
Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”
Ducking from attending Christian events — like the National Day of Prayer — while speaking out about his Muslim heritage doesn’t help matters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M
CRUSADER says
Obama’s mosque visit: wrong message, wrong venue ~
President Barack Obama’s Wednesday speech at the Islamic Society mosque in Baltimore, a venue tainted by a long history of preacing radicalism, summarizes his thinking about Islam and national security. That address has troubling implications and deserves detailed scrutiny.
OBAMA: “[I]f we’re serious about freedom of religion—and I’m speaking now to my fellow Christians who remain the majority in this country—we have to understand an attack on one faith is an attack on all our faiths . . . We have to reject a politics that seeks to manipulate prejudice or bias, and targets people because of religion.”
FACTS: The implication is that Islam (with over 3,000 active mosques) is under attack in America, and that Obama’s “fellow Christians” are the culprits who need to listen. Since 9/11, 89 Americans have been killed in 48 separate attacks of deadly Islamic terror in the U.S. while one Muslim was killed in an apparent “revenge” attack during the same period. Only Muslims routinely target members of other faiths on American soil. The number of Muslims involved in terrorism in the U.S. rose dramatically in 2015: it more than doubled over 2014. Two-thirds of them were born in America. The resulting public perceptions are not based on prejudice or bias, but on reason and empirical evidence.
OBAMA: “Muslim Americans keep us safe. They are our police. They are our fire fighters. They’re in (the Department of) Homeland Security.” The President added that Muslims don’t hear “thank you” enough.
FACTS: Proportionately very few Muslims become police officers, which is unsurprising considering that seven-in-ten U.S. Muslims (69%) say religion is very important in their lives, and are therefore reluctant to serve in enforcing man-made, Kufr (“infidel”) laws. It is seldom reported that, in view of many non-Muslim officers, their Muslim colleagues’ motives, loyalty and commitment are open to doubt. The situation is even more troubling at DHS: in 2010 Obama appointed Egyptian-born Muslim Brotherhood supporter Mohamed Elibiary as senior member of its Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC). He resigned in 2014, after indisputable evidence of his core loyalties had come to light. That evidence had been freely available during his vetting process.
OBAMA: “By the way, Thomas Jefferson’s opponents tried to stir things up by suggesting he was a Muslim—so I was not the first,” [laughter]. “I’m in good company.”
FACTS: In relation to Islam Thomas Jefferson is best remembered for his flat refusal to pay tribute to Barbary Coast Muslim pirates—the chief source of international terrorism of its time—and for ordering U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods that belonged to them. Jefferson’s Virginia Statue for Religious Freedom was designed to protect all faiths—“the Jew and the gentile, the Christian and the Mahometan”—with the last being an entirely hypothetical consideration designed to show “how far tolerance and equal civil rights extends.” During the 1790 presidential campaign Jefferson nevertheless declared that “the few . . . Jews, Mahomedans, Atheists or Deists among us” must, in the name of prudence and justice, be excluded “from our publick offices.” For him, the notion that a Muslim could be a citizen was an abstraction. Obama’s chronic Islamophilia is of a different order of magnitude. His “humorous” attempt to conflate mythical “suggestions that Jefferson was a Muslim” with the well-founded suggestion that Obama’s family roots and early childhood experiences have decisively shaped his views of Islam is disingenuous and deceitful. Some of his memorable quotes (“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,” to the UN General Assembly in September 2012; “The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer,” and “I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed,” in Cairo in 2009) are light years away from anything any of the Founding Fathers had ever said, written, or thought. The doubts about Obama’s core loyalties are still present because of his words and acts (notably his support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in 2013), not because of bigotry or prejudice.
OBAMA: “Let’s start with this fact: For more than a thousand years, people have been drawn to Islam’s message of peace.”
FACTS: There is no “message of peace” in Islam, as I have repeatedly pointed out in these pages over the years. Let me summarize: The word genocide was not even coined when Allah “declared,” and Muhammad conveyed: “When we decide to destroy a population, we send a definite order to them who have the good things in life and yet transgress; so that Allah’s word is proved true against them: then we destroy them utterly.” (Kuran 17, 16-17) Infidels “we utterly destroyed because of their inequities, setting up in their place other peoples.” (21:11) In his own lifetime, Muhammad established the model for subsequent relations between Islamic conquerors and their Christian or Jewish subjects: “Fight those who do not profess the true faith (Islam) till they pay the jizya (poll tax) with the hand of humility.” (9:29) That Islam sees the world as an open-ended conflict between the Land of Peace (Dar al-Islam) and the Land of War (Dar al-Harb) is Muhammad’s key legacy. Ever since his time Islam has been a permanent challenge to all non-Muslim polities around it. Muhammad’s practice and encouragement of bloodshed are unique in the history of religions. Murder, pillage, rape, and more murder are in the Kuran and in the Traditions have impressed his followers “with a profound belief in the value of bloodshed as opening the gates of Paradise” (Ibn Warraq) and prompted countless Muslim governors, caliphs, and viziers to refer to Muhammad’s example to justify their mass killings, looting, and destruction. “Kill, kill the unbelievers wherever you find them” is a divine injunction both unambiguous and powerful. The spread of Islam, historically, has been due to its constant use of unrestrained violence, not to the people being “drawn to its message” of their own free will.
Towards the end of his Baltimore speech Obama said that anyone who suggested that the United States was at war with Islam not only legitimized such groups as the Islamic State but also played into their hands. “That kind of mindset helps our enemies,” he added. “It helps our enemies recruit. It makes us all less safe.”
Obama’s assertions and Obama’s mindset helps America’s enemies and makes us all less safe. It prevents the development of an effective antiterrorist strategy at home and abroad. It promotes a systemic misunderstanding of Islam, its legacy, its methods and its ambitions, all of which can only serve the ends of those who hope to make America, Europe and the rest of the world Sharia-compliant by the end of this century.
In the person of Obama, the liberal-secular antipathy to Christianity of old standing has converged with the PC speech code of recent decades and his own personal idiosyncrasies to produce a political climate wherein it is increasingly difficult to discuss the true nature of Islam. Obama now declares that it is not only tantamount to thought-crime, and an attack on what he calls “American values,” but also a threat to national security to respond with facts and reason. His axiomatic assertion that Islam is a religion of peace (“let’s start with facts”) leaves exactly zero room for meaningful dialogue. The hypocrisy of “mainstream” Muslim leaders hosting him is of course predictable, and condoned by the openly deceitful nature of their creed (taqqiya).
The abuse of America’s hospitality by an alien and eminently un-American creed-cum-radical-ideology was initially justified, by the elite class, by sensitivity, multiculturalism, and “human rights.” With Obama it has progressed to the claim that this violent, mind-numbing dogma is as American as apple pie. The pathology is rooted in the adamant refusal of our post-national, secular-liberal elite to perceive their country as a real community, rooted in the continuity of shared memories and cultural legacies. They refuse to treat America as a coherent polity that ultimately belongs to the majority of people inhabiting her and bearing her name. The reluctance to read the riot act to the unassimilable newcomers who abuse the host-nations’ hospitality, starting with the arrests and swift deportations of all illegal and law-breaking immigrants, now extends to both sides of the Atlantic. In both cases it is likely to have fatal consequences, and Barack Hussein Obama will be remembered as a key culprit.
Some legacy . . .
https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/obamas-mosque-visit-wrong-message-wrong-venue/
(By:Srdja Trifkovic | February 04, 2016)
Rufolino says
Thank you for this important analysis.
Nancy Assaf says
Yes. Very interesting. I’d like to know what you would say to those who speak about the Christian wars and other violent stories depicted in the Bible. The politically correct always use that argument against anyone who is against or afraid of Islam. Even the argument that Christianity abhors violence in today’s World doesn’t appease.
gravenimage says
Christianity itself never preached violence–Islam certainly does.
Terry Gain says
A critical point to accept is the process of jihad did not begin with colonialism or any other unfortunate modern act.
…………
Another point to accept is that Islam also has a doctrine of conquest. This makes all the difference. We need to acknowledge that Islam is a threat to our way of life. Islam, not radical or extreme Islam. Islam.
gravenimage says
True, Terry.
Angemon says
But remember: poverty causes terrorism…
somehistory says
The mb began in Egypt…but it was a banned, illegal gang. Members were responsible for assassinations. Then when ‘o’ went to Egypt to tell moslims how great they are and how stinky are those who would want women not to have to cover their heads, he insisted that members of the mb sit in the front row to hear his speech.
The mb is the group whose members infamously wrote that they would ‘destroy the miserable house from within’…regarding the government of the U.S. And now, with omar, esp, in the “house” and working with mb offshoot, cair, is coming ever closer to doing that.
The mb is the group from which bin laden sprouted with “the core”…al queda…with encouragement from the leader if the mb. While the mb worked “non-wiolently” to accomplish their goals of take-over, al queda worked with guns and killing and open warfare for the same goal.
morsi was a top member of the mb in Egypt and in order to take over that country, used every dirty trick to “win” the election. Fraud, violence, rape of children, threats, etc. were all used so morsi and the mb could gain the power they had always wanted. And when they gained the power, they imprisoned thousands of people who had opposed them.
It’s good that Germany is beginning to recognize the danger in the mb…but it doesn’t look like they have made the terror group illegal. As long as it exists in the country, it will be using every trick to take over. They are like termites. One may not see them doing the damage until the building collapses.
This… “non-violent legal Islamist groups “make ISIS look innocent” …makes no sense.
gravenimage says
Yes–disgusting, Somehistory.
Jayell says
“Intelligence warns about MB agenda, danger to “social peace and harmony”
For those UK people who remember BBC radio’s ‘Navy Lark’, this could be a quote from the severely-intellectually-challenged naval ‘intelligence office’. Or, to quote the legendary Basil Fawlty, it’s just “Stating the bl**ding obvious”. With a well-publicised epidemic of rapes and murders up and down Germany featuring you-know-who, these bright sparks are either a bit blinkered, or short of a few IQ points, or living in cloud-cuckoo-land, because they apparently haven’t noticed that ‘social peace and harmony’ hasn’t simply disappeared out of the window, it was never there in the first place!. Or maybe they think that their compatriots are as gullible as they’re apparently told to be.
Eric Jones says
One possible counter measure is to require that all representatives of Islamic organizations state whether they prefer sharia to the constitution of the country they reside in. When they accuse us of islamophobia we accuse them of promoting sharia.
Eric
Nancy Assaf says
Eric, I couldn’t imagine any situation where a Muslim would actually state that he or she preferred sharia to the Constitution of the United States. If a Muslim took an oath, and still undermined our Constitution, you would have proof that there is no truth in what that person said. I find that even American politicians do that very thing. They say whatever they need to say to get elected, then proceed to govern however they want.
Mark Wernimont says
Other than that tho “Islam is peace”
2:191 “kill them wherever you overtake them……such is the recompense of the disbelievers”
47:4 “when you meet disbelievers strike their necks”
4:89 “if they turn away (from islam) seize them & kill them”
5:38 “as for the thief, amputate their hands…”
5:51 ” take no Jew or Christian as an ally”
8:12 “cast TERROR into the hearts of those who disbelieve, so strike their necks”
8:60 “prepare whatever steeds of war you are able that you may TERRIFY the enemies of allah”
8:67 “it is not for a prophet to have captives of war until he inflicts a slaughter upon the land”
9:5 “when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists”
8:39 “fight til all religion is for allah”
There are 109 verses of persecution & murder against non-muslims (aka disbelievers)