They can’t refute what I say, so they want me silenced, since my work exposes the grim reality of how jihadis use the texts and teachings of the Qur’an to justify jihad violence and Sharia oppression. And Google, being already Sharia-compliant, is very likely to comply.
Outrageous. If you search "Quran in English" on Google, the first 2 items are by Robert Spencer
Google must do better
ICYMI: Spencer is "one of America’s most prolific & vociferous anti-Muslim propagandists" & was banned from the UK due to his viewshttps://t.co/McO8Avybw2 pic.twitter.com/jTwI3kWqgP
— Miqdaad Versi (@miqdaad) July 10, 2019
and I responded:
Fascist thug @miqdaad calls on Google to censor true and accurate information about the Quran. Miqdaad, I’ll send you a free copy, and if you can prove an error of fact in the book, I’ll send you $5,000. Deal? https://t.co/Ob27bCfMpB
— Robert Spencer (@jihadwatchRS) July 10, 2019
So far, Versi has not responded to my offer. What a surprise!
CRUSADER says
Good for Mr Spencer for valiantly duking it out with the supremacist Islamist thug who decrees things which aren’t truthful and only hurtful.
Mr Spencer is a prime exemplar to us!
LLetto says
?
George Schmidt says
Keep up the good work of exposing the Jihadists Mr. Spencer. Don’t hold your breath waiting for any kind of rational reply. Just stay strong!
CRUSADER says
We all — each of us — should be doing likewise
in our own capacities and realms of influence…
J D S says
Same old thing over and over…if something hits home then Muslims whimper and crying foul …As always THE TRUTH HURTS. Thumbs up to RObert for putting yet another muslim supremacists in his place…The trash can.
CRUSADER says
Regarding the UK as being brought up as an example to follow….
….well, the UK has done many stupid and ignorant things in recent years.
So the UK is not a good example to be modeling.
However, taking up Mr Spencer’s offer of $5k would be fascinating!
What a smashing challenge this is. Bravo, Mr Spencer;
even more so for demonstrating how cowardly the opposition is.
Krishna says
Your book result is not appearing now in Google
Krishna says
Replied to you by mistake
CRUSADER says
Qur’an in English
Quran in English
and
Koran in English
books to get are:
by Robert Spencer
by Bill Warner
by Tommy Roberts
All excellent reads….
Highly recommended not to censor.
(Herr Adolf & Mufti al-Husseini , are you listening??)
LLetto says
Google, Koran in English daily
Bill says
Ha ha ha he demands like he’s someone special…
gravenimage says
This is more bs from Miqdaad Versi:
“‘The Tories are institutionally Islamophobic’”
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/mar/25/the-tories-are-institutionally-islamophobic-miqdaad-versi-takes-on-mps-and-the-media
Never mind Theresa May fawning all over these thugs–as did most of her Tory predecessors of recent memory.
And here he is, lying again–this time about “Islamophobia”:
“Miqdaad Versi Is Dishonest in Essay About the Semantics of Islamophobia”
https://westbasedpost.com/2018/05/17/miqdaad-versi-is-dishonest-in-essay-about-the-semantics-of-islamophobia/
Krishna says
Robert Spencer book result is not appearing now in Google
LLetto says
I can’t find it anymore either
t. says
Why, it was there before today?
Westman says
It seems that the best thing we can do about this is to include “Quran in English” in every post. Let’s get started:
Quran in English
Quran in English
Quran in English
Westman says
Quran in English The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer.
Quran in English The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer.
Quran in English The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer.
CRUSADER says
Here is a review in Good Reads:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6598234-the-complete-infidel-s-guide-to-the-koran
“The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran”
by Robert Spencer
“The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran” exposes how the Koran incites hatred and violence and is anti-democratic, anti-freedom, and intolerant of any other ideology. Stripping out the obsolete debate, “The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran” focuses on the decrees toward Jews and Christians, how they were viewed by Muhammad, what “the infidels” have done wrong and what the Koran has in store for them.
“The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran” is the essential primer to comprehending one of the most cryptic and misunderstood religious texts. Robert Spencer sheds light on the violence inherent in the Koran and reveals the frightening implications for the War on Terror, the U.S. and the world.
In “The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran” you will learn:
The true meaning of celebrated and seemingly benign verses, such as “Strive in the way of Allah” and “Persecution is worse than slaughter” How the Koran sanctions domestic abuse, honor killing, and murder.
How the Koran not only discourages Infidels from reading it, but mandates that they don’t even touch it.
Why Obama, Clinton, and others are dangerously close to supporting a multiculturalism based on an ideology that aims to destroy the principles America holds dear.
gravenimage says
You can buy the book here:
https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Infidels-Guide-Koran/dp/1596981040
And if you want to get a taste of content, check out Robert Spencer’s fine “Blogging the Qur’an” series, here, free of charge:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/quran-commentary
Dennis says
Your last paragraph/sentence is right on. Succinctly stated and accurate. Unless the free world acknowledges that IS the intent of Islam, I believe that free societies will become a thing of the past. They constantly attempt to defend themselves by accusing people like Spencer and those others willing to speak out, as “racists” and “bigots,” when the truth is that those who support the Islamic belief system are the true racist/bigots, and I do not see them called out as being such. Until the media and our leaders learn that is the proper response to those believers who put down democracy and all it stands for, we will never stop those lunatics properly.
DJ says
Just Googled those terms and got nothing by Robert. So apparently Google has complied with the request to censor. Perhaps others get different results? Let us know please.
Angemon says
Not when I searched.
Jim says
Nor I…I was very disappointed..
CRUSADER says
But, Jim, you do have your own copy, don’t you, by now?
“The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran” by Robert Spencer
(Quran in English)
gravenimage says
Neither did I.
My understanding is that it depends on a number of factors, including search engine (Google in this case, like Versi), nation where you are posting from, and personal search history. I am *no* expert on this, though. Perhaps someone more tech savvy than myself can add some information here?
CRUSADER says
Interesting to read this link from Jihad Watch on similar topic from 2015….
========================================================
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/12/robert-spencer-pjm-new-english-quran-says-it-often-means-opposite-of-what-it-says
Robert Spencer, PJM:
New English Quran Says It Often Means Opposite of What It Says
DEC 8, 2015 / BY ROBERT SPENCER
Over at PJ Media I describe a new volume of smoke and mirrors from Islamic apologists in the U.S. I could have made this article two or three times longer: the half-truths and word-twistings are scattered across every page.
For example, The Study Quran translates Qur’an 48:29 as: “Muhammad is the Messenger of God. Those who follow him are harsh against the disbelievers, merciful to one another.” That’s fine as a translation of the Arabic, but the commentary on the verse, after dismissively granting the obvious, offers a particularly preposterous attempt at whitewashing the passage and convincing the hapless reader that it means the opposite of what it says: “That they are harsh against the disbelievers implies that they never relent in their opposition to them and fight them when necessary (IK [Ibn Kathir]). In this context it also reflects an aspect of mercy, for just as the sunlight is most intense on black surfaces and less so on white surfaces, so are the believers harsher or ‘more intense’ with the disbelievers. In this sense, the believers must display the truth to them with a greater intensity of light and insight. Among each other, however, there is less need for such intensity, because the truth is manifest as gentle warmth.”
So you see, this Qur’an passage is really all about tough love. When the Qur’an says be “harsh” with non-Muslims, it really means be merciful to them. It doesn’t mean burn their churches and drive them from their homes and demand from them the jizya or conversion to Islam. No, no: all that would be…harsh. Instead, it just means be “intense” in telling them about Islam. But the believers don’t need this, as they are already Muslim.
The Study Quran, therefore, would have you believe that being harsh equals being merciful, and that one must therefore be merciful to unbelievers when the Qur’an says to be harsh to them. But the passage in question also says that Muslims must be “merciful to one another” — but The Study Quran, says that to be merciful equals “display[ing] the truth,” and since Muslims have the truth already, they need not be “intense” in displaying it to one another. So by the time The Study Quran is through, it has rendered the verse that says “Muhammad is the Messenger of God. Those who follow him are harsh against the disbelievers, merciful to one another” as “Muhammad is the Messenger of God. Those who follow him are intense in mercy toward the disbelievers, and less merciful to one another.”
And they actually expect us to swallow this risible and cynical exercise in deception.
CNN hopes that the new Study Quran, a book of English translations and commentaries on the Quran, will help “curb extremism.”
Is the book a genuine attempt to counter the jihadists’ interpretation of Islam? Or is it a cynical exercise designed to deceive Western non-Muslims, keeping them ignorant and complacent about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat?
Unfortunately but predictably, it’s much more the latter than the former. The Study Quran does not deny the ugly reality of violence and hatred in the Muslim holy book; instead it buries it under mountains of irrelevant commentary. Often, The Study Quran also hides the ugliness in plain sight by not addressing the obviously problematic content of particular verses.
This deflection begins right at the beginning, with The Study Quran’s treatment of the Fatihah. The Fatihah is the first chapter of the Quran, and is also the most commonly recited prayer in Islam. The translators opted for pseudo-King James Bible archaisms, rendering the last two verses of the Fatihah as follows:
Guide us to the straight path, the path of those whom Thou hast blessed, not of those who incur wrath or those who are astray.
Sounds reasonable. But virtually all mainstream and authoritative commentators on the Quran identify “those who incur wrath” as the Jews.
Similarly, “those who are astray” are overwhelmingly accepted to be the Christians.
The Study Quran doesn’t deny this; in fact, it acknowledges it … but only after seven windy paragraphs about what it means to be blessed and other related matters. Anyone who is still reading after all that chloroform in print, to borrow Mark Twain’s phrase, will come to this:
Based upon a saying attributed to the Prophet, though not considered to be of the highest degree of authenticity, one interpretation given by a number of commentators is that those who incur wrath and those who are astray refer to Jews and Christians, respectively (IK, JJ, Q, T, Z).
(“IK, JJ, Q, T, Z” are shorthands for Muslim commentators on the Qur’an: Ibn Kathir; Jalal al-Din al-Mahalli and Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, “the two Jalals,” author of the Tafsir al-Jalalayn; al-Qurtubi; al-Tabari; and al-Zamakhshari.)
The Study Quran doesn’t offer a single alternative interpretation of this verse (the editors could have invoked al-Nisaburi, to whose commentary they do refer on occasion. He says that “those who have incurred Allah’s wrath are the people of negligence, and those who have gone astray are the people of immoderation”). By introducing the interpretation by claiming it was based on a doubtful statement of Muhammad, and by only mentioning it at all after lengthy commentary about matters of slight import, the authors reveal an agenda of hiding the causes and justifications of “extremism”; of keeping readers from learning the reality of the verse’s historical and present significance.
This pattern continues on throughout The Study Quran. For example, Qur’an 98:6 reads:
Truly the disbelievers among the People of the Book and the idolaters are in the Fire of Hell, abiding therein; it is they who are the worst of creation.
The “disbelievers among the People of the Book” refers to Jews and Christians who do not become Muslims. (For an example, you can find this near-unanimously accepted description in the Tanwir al-Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas.)
The Study Quran, however, doesn’t want the reader to learn of that.
Instead, it offers a lengthy disquisition into mankind’s “unique place in the cosmos.” It never gets around to pointing out that the Qur’an just called Jews and Christians the “worst of creation,” or explaining the implications of that declaration throughout history, including the current purges and slaughter of Jews and Christians happening today.
The Study Quran is no better when dealing with the Quran’s direct commands to make war against and subjugate unbelievers.
In an article entitled “Conquest and Conversion, War and Peace in the Quran,” Holy Cross professor Caner K. Dagli asserts:
Although it is true that some authorities throughout Islam’s long history have interpreted the Islamic law of war as giving Muslims unqualified permission to conquer and expand into territory controlled by non-Muslims or in extreme cases to bring the entire world under their dominion, this has remained a minority view. The complex history of the first generation of Muslim conquest can be interpreted more plausibly as a stage in the history of Islam when the future existence of the religion was far from certain and when expansion meant survival.
There, you see? Perhaps CNN was right: this book is going to “curb extremism.” The CNN article quoted notorious imam Suhaib Webb imagining a young Muslim being attracted to ISIS or al-Qaeda, but then “opening The Study Quran, and reading scholars’ commentaries on those perplexing verses, and finding that most of them, perhaps all of them, disagree with the terrorists.”
Yes, imagine that: a young man reads The Study Quran, and finds that his dreams of Islamic world conquest are less plausible than its claim that violence is only justified when “the future existence of the religion was far from certain and when expansion meant survival.” Unfortunately, ISIS and other jihad groups today contend that the U.S. and the West do threaten the survival of Islam. So Dagli’s contention that Muslims were ordered to fight when “the future existence of the religion [is] far from certain” does not have the deterrent effect Webb hopes it will; logically, it could actually encourage the opposite….
Read the rest here.
https://pjmedia.com/blog/new-english-quran-praised-by-cnn-says-book-often-means-opposite-of-what-it-says
CRUSADER says
Quran in English The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer.
Quran in English The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer.
Quran in English The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer.
gravenimage says
Yes–the “Study Qur’an” commentary is a load of Taqiyya, often blatantly contradicting the text itself. But all too many Infidels *want* to be deceived.
Theodore says
Google are assholes and keep on proving it daily. They wouldn’t know fair if it slapped them in the face.
Mr. Spencer and his works are a Godsend. Muslims will try to stop ALL material that explains their idiotic belief system. Google should be fined heavily for their mismanagement of material they process. Their so-called logarithms suck. They hate conservatives; why don’t you try being fair for a change.
All should fight back on the sharia compliance bs as that is what it is for sure.
DHazard says
Not to much to this story except evidence that Google is hard for some people and formulating a proper query can take all day.
CRUSADER says
Try…. DuckDuckGo ….?
gravenimage says
In this case–so far, at least–it is less about Google and more about Muslim supremacists demanding that critics of Islam be silenced.
CRUSADER says
Video found when searching Robert Spencer & Quran in English….
“Robert Spencer: The Theological Aspects of Islam That Lead to Jihad”:
(….understand your enemy , in order to defeat the enemy’s threat…)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=708uCXAO6SE
gravenimage says
+1
CRUSADER says
President Trump has commented today on Social Media Summit….
Tune in….
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Miqdaad, if you’re going to attack a world renowned scholar and human rights activist like Spencer then please offer more than your own bigoted contempt. If you have some rational objection to something Spencer has said then please enlighten us, I like to hear all sides of the issue. Mr. Spencer is not the kind of man to shy away from a good debate, on the contrary, he seems to relish the opportunity. Spencer’s book is right where it should be, on top of the list of books to read about islam. The only thing outrageous here is that a man like Miqdaad, supposedly Oxford educated, thinks empty ad hominem attacks could possible discredit the good work Spencer does. I’ve watched videos of this man, and he strikes me as your typical apologist who refuses to acknowledge the ugly facts about islam and its ill effects on human rights and society. In a joint interview with Hirsi Ali he said,
Everyone needs to work together to solve the problem of extremism, but there’s no special duty on muslims.
And therein lay the core problem in my opinion, Muslims like Miqdaad fail to understand or accept the cause of muslim terrorism is quite obviously islam. The onus should be on them more than anyone else to eliminate within their ranks those who would use islam’s doctrines to justify the violence they do. Instead he proceeds in the same interview to evade the issue of muslim responsibility with victimhood excuses like bullying and negative perceptions of muslims. He wouldn’t dare be candid about muslims’ own failings in history concerning human rights, war, terrorism and the islamic doctrines that inspire those evils–NOPE, he’d prefer we focus on the justifiable contempt and fear non-muslims have for those terrors more than the terrors themselves. This is why Miqdaad brings nothing good to the table concerning our differences, because he’s fully dedicated to the muslim ideals of religious supremacy and bigoted intolerance over rational debate and humanitarian concern. I’d rather be the high school dropout that I am and want human rights over tyranny than be an Oxford educated muslim who’s intellectually and morally blinded by an ignorant and evil creed.
Westman says
Apologists like Miqdaad are angry that they have climbed the ladder of religion and found it is not leaning against a Western-accepted wall. Islam’s current and past human rights history cannot be undone by simply renaming the wall to be non-apartheid while the Quran prescribes apartheid action against unbelievers.
Nothing is really left for apologists to utilize other than anger, name-calling, threats, and lying.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
There’s truth in what you say, Westman. Fools like Miqdaad have invested heavily in the absurdities of islam and I’m sure it’s angering to not be greeted by a Western wall of acceptance, to use your metaphor. Most muslim apologists I’ve heard don’t make a serious effort to deal honestly with our concerns and criticisms, articulate dissimulation is the very best they can do. But more often than not they don’t even care to hide their dissembling nature, we’re just “racists” and “islamophobes” because we care about rape, and honor killings, and terror for religion. Their leftist allies work diligently to maintain these unjust and bigoted epithets because they too having nothing intelligent to offer, just their own desire for votes and/or power and the belief that islam will help them. They are wrong of course, in the end islam will kill or destroy them too. The world is full of evil and unscrupulous people who prefer a world of barbaric and misogynistic control for islam. If a good god of humanitarian concern truly does exist then I know I’m doing god’s work, as is Spencer, and Geller, and Wilders, and Marie Waters, and Tommy R., and anyone else who does their part to stem the islamic tide of religious hate and intolerance. These are the people I admire, good people who want to help humanity with life saving truths, unlike Miqdaad who’s primary concern is islam over and above universal equality and the religious freedoms of others.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Here’s that vid with the interview I quoted. One of Hirsi Ali’s response to Miqdaad was pithy and brilliant:
You are clearly part of the problem…. If you are horrified and you are disgusted by the actions of the islamic state of Iraq and Syria, then you should be equally disgusted by the theology that makes it right and justifies it–that’s within islam, that’s what muslims need to take ownership of.
So true. Ayaan is a tremendous asset to freedom and good morals in contrast to the moral and religious tyrannies of islam. Miqdaad is on the wrong side of this issue, while Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a gift to humanity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9sArm9TpEw
CRUSADER says
Miqdaad :
“Primary cause of radicalization is not ideological world view….
but a range of different things…. There needs to be a multifaceted
approach to it…. Islamic values are the solution for many of these people.”
“There’s no special duty….”
“We have a situation where islamophobia is becoming socially acceptable.”
———-
Hirsi Ali:
Muslims buy into the narrative that they are “victims”….
“The way to fight the Islamic extremists is to take ownership…”
Hirsi Ali still talks about Islam as having “extremes”….
as if there is a moderation within Islam’s spectrum, however.
duh swami says
Quran in English…A Muslim who claimed to be a doctor, to;d me that the Quran in English is no good due to numerous translation errors…
When I asked him what I should do with my English Quran that is faulty and incomplete, He told me to take it to the nearest mosque and give it to the Imam explaining that this book is no good….I would do that but there is no nearest mosque around here…
Westman says
Perhaps we should take our English New Testaments and trade them for some Greek Bibles. Then we could memorize them and recite them without knowing how to communicate in Greek. That makes perfect Islamic sense. Certainly we would all be edified while reciting the Lord’s Prayer in Greek, 5 times a day.
What shabby excuses a Muslim must make for a desert Bedouin religion.
CRUSADER says
‘Efharisto para poli’ !!!!
What a (corinthian/ionian/doric) Capital Concept that is, Westman !
gravenimage says
duh swami wrote:
….I would do that but there is no nearest mosque around here…
…………………..
You lucky, lucky man!
This is an absurd claim, in any case–*any* language can be translated. Also striking is that all translations of the Qur’an in English are so very similar–those by Jews, by Christians, by Muslims–and by those who dislike Islam, and by those who intend to use the Qur’an as Da’wa. Surely this would not be the case if translation from Arabic to English were not possible? You’d think that these translations would be all over the map, but they are not.
Antiislamicman says
Islam hates the truth as it exposes their false religion
No Muzzies Here says
Google apparently has complied with the Sharia request, and removed Robert Spencer’s books from the search results. Try it.
gravenimage says
UK Islamic supremacist Miqdaad Versi demands that Google censor Robert Spencer’s guide to the Qur’an
……………….
Of course–as noted–Miqdaad Versi is unable to note anything that Robert Spencer has gotten wrong–because he can’t.
CRUSADER says
Thanks for the links to purchasing:
“The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran” by Robert Spencer
Now… if only amazon would sell Tommy Robinson’s “Muhammad’s Koran”
( another version of Quran in English )
gravenimage says
Agreed, CRUSADER. My understanding is that Robinson’s book is only available for shipping in Britain at this point. I wish I could get it–I’m in the US.
Please note that my listing Amazon for Spencer’s book was not intended as an endorsement–it is just so ubiquitous these days.
Lydia Church says
Right, they can’t debunk the truth, so they try to silence it.
The truth is now taboo, as we see all over.
And as for the violent left, if they want to beat someone up?
No problem!
Just make up a justification for it, and off you go!
(According to them, no matter how far back you go, they are always the oppressed, the poor, the victim, etc. so they will have endless justifications and rationalizations.)
Want to kill someone who doesn’t agree with your leftist views?
No problem!
Now it’s apparently ‘okay’ according to the new gestapo; facebook.
Want to silence those who dissent from your politically ‘correct’ views?
No problem!
Just censor them and add some fake reason from a bag of random and senseless excuses.
fait accompli for them…
Raja says
Things just don’t seem to get any better in the world. There is an all encompassing need to fight tooth and nail for our freedom. What started as a free social media is out to destroy us for our Character and grit.
Some five years back I googled evil Islam and I was led to Jihadwatch.org. Not any more. The Islamic supremacists are tightening the screws on the rest relentlessly through everything possible.
Wellington says
Sympathetic here. Well, freedom isn’t free and throughout human history, even to this day, it has been scarce to very scarce.
And here I will expand a bit, to wit, what made the West, and especially America, so great, ABOVE ALL OTHER FACTORS, is freedom. Others like the Chinese and the Islamic world can use the technology which the West created and which was created first and foremost because of freedom, but such areas of the world will forever be in dependency mode. My God, the Chinese to this very day first and foremost rely upon stealing technology from America and the West rather than, duh, first and foremost developing new technology themselves by experimenting with freedom. Wisdom of the East and all that rot my butt.
Dumb world. Most of it that is, including most menacingly not the Islamic world, which is forever retrograde, but Western Leftism which, among other really dumb aspects, is a mortal enemy of liberty. Yes, the Left is so effing stupid it would kill the Golden Goose. Yep, it will if given the chance. Think AOC as an example, a la Patrick Moore, pompous little twit that she is. She’s clueless on freedom, including its fragility and responsibilities. If she’s the future of America, you can kiss America and freedom (and lot’s of good stuff) good-bye.
CRUSADER says
This is what I came across in Googling “Evil Islam” :
========================================
This ex-FBI agent who called Islam “barbaric and evil” was allowed to …
https://www.texastribune.org/…/muslim-advocates-texas-commission-law-enforcement…
May 14, 2018 – The Texas Commission on Law Enforcement signed off on continuing education credits for “Understanding the Jihadi Threat to America,” a program run by an ex-FBI agent who’s called Islam “barbaric and evil.” … And in Texas, ex-FBI agent John Guandolo was allowed by the state’s …
Islam – Suffering and the Problem of Evil – Patheos
https://www.patheos.com/library/islam/beliefs/suffering-and-the-problem-of-evil
The monotheistic faiths must consider the problems of suffering and evil within the context of God’s power and mercy. In Islam, there are two views of suffering, …
Islam: Evil in the Name of God: Jake Neuman: 9780980994872 …
https://www.amazon.com/Islam-Evil-Name-Jake-Neuman/dp/098099487X
Islam: Evil in the Name of God [Jake Neuman] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. It’s All About Islam – Stupid Kafir A Stark Message from God …
…
CRUSADER says
…
CAIR Files Formal Complaint Against Tennessee DA Who Called Islam
https://www.cair.com/cair_files_formal_complaint_against_tennessee_da_who_called…
May 28, 2019 – CAIR Files Formal Complaint Against Tennessee DA Who Called Islam ‘Evil,’ Compared Muslims to Members of KKK. Posted by Ibrahim …
The Evil of Whitewashing Islam – The Objective Standard
https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/2014/10/evil-whitewashing-islam/
Oct 26, 2014 – One religion today regularly motivates large numbers of its followers to murder, behead, rape, and enslave people. That religion is Islam.
More Good or Evil | Islam Ahmadiyya – Al Islam
https://www.alislam.org/library/book/way-of-seekers/more-good-or-evil/
The fact is that owing mainly to errors of observation, it is often forgotten that the world is more good than evil. Take a thief. True, he commits theft. But against …
——————-
mortimer says
Message to GOOGLE: Islam cannot be successfully defended in debate. Robert Spencer has shown that repeatedly. Islam has no argument in its defense.
Muslim apologists and debaters have REPEATEDLY lost to the MASTER of ISLAM-POLEMICS, Robert Spencer. They have given up debating Robert Spencer because the probability of their losing is close to 100%.
Surely, GOOGLE and other platforms should realize that there is NO PURPOSE SERVED by PROPPING UP ISLAM … Islam cannot be successfully defended in debate.
Wellington says
+1
CRUSADER says
Well, we know how the book ends….
whether it is in English translation of the Queer’an or
in Arabic….
It ends with HATE and DEATH to those who are not deemed Muslims.
No redemption.
Fritz says
Truth is the greatest danger to islam.
gravenimage says
Hear, hear!
BegrensEuropa! says
The trouble with islam is that there is no truth, only dawah. And the truth is described in the books of Robert Spencer, Bill Warner, Hirsi Ali, Hans Jansen, Jamie Glazov, Bat Yeor, Levi Strauss, Voltaire, Churchill and hundreds of others. It is not written in the books by Reza Aslan, and Karen Armstrong and the like. Dawah is part of the grand strategy to submit (=islam) the world, govern it by theocrats, and force us to ‘think’ the way they do, leaving no room for independent inquiry. Dawah will dress up like truth, but it serves no other purpose than to deceive uncritically instead of clarify critically.
Mike says
Bob , Under Obouma , you were not invited to the WH. Did you try with the new tenant .
Marigold says
I think at the bottom of it all is fear!.The apologists for Islam know that if they speak out against it they might become targets themselves and that is what they fear most.
muslimslife67 says
I pray at a comfortable pace but don’t hold for too long so it isn’t as much of a problem. At the masjid, we often hold the sujda for much longer and I start to want to go into the sujda late / get up from it early etc.
gravenimage says
No one here cares if muslimslife67 is lax in his vicious Islamic prayers or not. We only care about whether he is trying to destroy our freedoms or murder us.
A_M_Swallow says
Now we find out if Google is a collaborator.
That is a crime so evil people were hung for it at the end of World War 2.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
It’s odd that a new technology that took away many of the limits of free speech brought heretofore direct limits on it. I’ve lost my capacity for appreciating irony. System overload.
Mixtli says
Keep up the good work Mr. Spencer, we must face valiantly the Islamist supremacists and they will play “the poor little victim” so their leftist allies will console them. 😀
sidney penny says
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/05/video-robert-spencer-at-cal-poly-may-13-2014
One of the best talks by Robert Spencer.
The question and answer at the end is super.
At 1.59.19 he challenges anyone that if they read anything he has written and find anything hateful or inaccurate contact him and tell him where he is speaking falsehood and he will correct it.
Have there been any takers Mr Robert Spencer?
and listen to the question ( just after this one) about hate speech and and the answer by Robert Spencer