“Unfortunately, I was unable to go on holiday to Syria because something very important got in the way, and I hope to catch up very soon during the holidays. Germany is stressful and you need some kind of break.”
Germany is stressful? It was Syria that was supposed to be stressful, and from which you were seeking refuge.
Any “refugee” who returns home on vacation should never have been allowed into Germany in the first place, and should be immediately deported. This is simple common sense, but no one has that anymore.
“Germany To Strip Asylum Status of ‘Refugees’ Who Go Home on Holiday,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, August 19, 2019 (thanks to the Geller Report):
German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer has announced the government will be cracking down on Syrians with asylum status who go on holiday back to Syria.
Bavarian centre-right leader Horst Seehofer said that the government would be looking to strip Syrians who visit their home country on holiday of their asylum status, saying that those who regularly travel to the country cannot make a serious claim that they are being persecuted there, Kronen Zeitung reports.
“We have to deprive them of their refugee status,” Seehofer added and said that the Interior Ministry was monitoring any such activity from Syrians with refugee status living in Germany.
He also said that the government was watching the situation inside Syria closely and said, “If the situation permits, we will carry out repatriations.”…
Earlier this year, noted Syrian refugee blogger Aras Bacho complained that he would like to go and visit Syria this summer but was unable to and said he knew at least six other Syrians who want for a holiday in Syria.
“Unfortunately, I was unable to go on holiday to Syria because something very important got in the way, and I hope to catch up very soon during the holidays. Germany is stressful and you need some kind of break,” he said.
Angemon says
Well, DUH!!!
RichardL says
I am sorry to disappoint all of you, but that is just for show. They intend to do nothing. Seehofer has said things like that many times. Not once did anything happen.
Anjuli Pandavar says
RL,
—
I suspect the same, especially given the obvious escape hatches: “those who *regularly* travel to the country” and “If the situation permits”. If you’ve supposedly fled for your life, how could you return there even once? Even if it were peaceful, people who flee for their lives often find it too traumatic to return. But when it comes to actually deporting these so-called “refugees”, the whole nonsense is stood on its head with “if the situation permits”. They’re going *on holiday*. How does that situation not permit?
Austrian Guy says
true, that’s why he is called “Drehhofer” (Spinhofer), or “Ankündigungs Horst” (anouncement Horst) after all
gravenimage says
You may be right, RichardL–of course, I hope not.
Rufolino says
Why don’t they admit the reality ?
Most of these people are not refugees !
They are Islamic migrants who come with various motives, often nefarious and ideologically driven.
Leslie Fish says
A good start, but too little and too late.
CogitoErgoSum says
Life in Germany is stressful so I need to go back to a war zone for a break. I love a good joke.
gravenimage says
+1
FYI says
My lip reading skills are not great but I think I can translate the picture above..
Merkel: It isn’t too late is it?Disem Wasser is gute..!
Seehofer: But Angela.. Wir left Der barn Door offen and der Horst..der Horse..got aus..
PRCS says
Yes, from what I remember of my High School German classes, I’d say that’s about right.
Tricia Stuercke says
My high school German gave me the 1 word I pray Angela mutters to herself 1000x per day, realizing what she’s done to my ancestors’ homeland:
“SCHEISSE!” ?
Jeffrey Sams says
My high school German, plus the observation of history, gives me this: “Deutschland ist kaput.”
Tricia Stuercke says
Es ist SEHR KAPUTT! Deutschland ist nicht Deutschland… Dankë Merkel. ?
gravenimage says
Grimly hilarious, FYI–and I didn’t even need my high school German to read it!
jayell says
“Life in Germany is stressful so I need to go back to a war zone for a break.” Absolutely. All that scrounging and crime is hard work.
Pete says
Why not? In the uk, somali parents send their teenage kids back to somaliland to keep them safe from knife crime in londonistan streets
gravenimage says
Most of that knife crime, of course, is Jihad.
Michael Copeland says
A family from Chechnya granted asylum in USA also went back there on visits, some prolonged. They are the Tsarnaev family: the two sons set the Boston Marathon bomb.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Michael.
James Lincoln says
+1
Steve says
Shaykh Seehofer, as a committed dhimmi and maybe secret Muslim, does not want one less Muslim in Germany, so he is saying this to prevent them leaving. This is the same Seehofer after all who has supported Umm Merkel and kept her in power all along, as she strikes mighty blows of jihad to turn Germany into Germanistan, and who also co-appointed (with Merkel) an Istanbul-born Turk to co-run the internal German intel agency the BfV, the same one that is supposed to protect the constitution that Merkel and Seehofer have made a mockery of, but ignores it to protect them in their jihad-work instead.
An appointee of Erdogan or MbS could hardly have done better.
Sun says
Very true, Steve.
“German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer has announced the government will be cracking down on Syrians with asylum status who go on holiday back to Syria.”
“We have to deprive them of their refugee status,” Seehofer added.
That’s what they are telling the Germans since years. Most asylum seekers are not even Syrians, they only claimed to be Syrians to get easier into the welfare system. “To deprive them of their refugee status” does not mean that they are forced to leave the county. Most illegals stay and continue to receive financial support.
Germany has around 82.5 million inhabitants. At the end of the year 2018, 10.6 million people of exclusively foreign nationality were registered in the Central Register of Foreigners. migrants from non-EU countries made up 6 million people. Most of them receive welfare benefits.
These figures represent only the estimated registered immigrants. The Federal Government still refuses to publish all figures – especially the information on how many refugees entered Germany by plane is claimed from the government as ‘a classified information’.
In 2018, only 23.617 illegal immigrants were deported.The borders are still open for everybody who is able to pronounce the word ‘asylum’ – with or without identity papers.
Next month, the elections in Eastern Germany are coming up. Merkel and Seehofer are fishing for votes.
Steve says
Many millions more are dual-citizens, or German-nationality ethnic non-Germans. Ethnocide in action.
Rufolino says
Seehofer clearly wants to keep Islamic migrants in Germany, despite the terrible cultural impact and crime.
You can be sure Seehofer doesn’t live next to migrants.
It’s all insane, and more and more people are realising this.
But changing a mindset is slow work (and it is probably too late to offset the catastrophic damage). “There is nothing so painful as a new idea.”
CRUSADER says
Why is defending Europe against Islamic incursion “a new idea”?
gravenimage says
Germany to strip “refugee” status from Muslim migrants from Syria who return home on vacation
……………….
*Good*.
What genuine refugees have *ever* gone on vacation to the place they supposedly need asylum from? What blatant claptrap.
Tricia Stuercke says
With ya, GI, + HOW does a “refugee” even have MONEY for a “vacation”?! I’ve been too broke to go ANYWHERE since my Acapulco Honeymoon almost 30yrs ago!
“Fun Fact”: Our Honeymoon Hotel is now famous for having decapitated heads rolled into the lobby by the Jihadi-like Drug Cartel!
CRUSADER says
Okay, so, now Mexico is stressful!
gravenimage says
Yes–we lived on welfare when I was a child and we never had money for a vacation.
Reg says
Agree GI..I’m waiting for them to begin screaming for special medical status and benefits as Stockholm Syndrome victims
gravenimage says
I would not be surprised.
Reg says
Yep … they will soon be advocating for privileged medical status, benefits etc. because of their Syrian Stockholm Syndrome.
AP says
Everytime I think about A Smerkle, I laugh, what a terrible leader.
Lydia Church says
Then let them to go Syria as refugees from Germany, if that’s the way they feel!
Lydia Church says
Also ironic that the migrants coming into Europe as ‘refugees’ are causing so much terrorism that the natural citizens depart as refugees from Europe to places like Israel!
James Lincoln says
Lydia Church,
Absolutely true. Western Europe natives are also seriously considering emigrating to countries like Hungary.
The last “beacons of hope” in the area – namely the Visegrad 4 – should not only bar Muslims but also the far left / Marxist / globalists, etc.
Extreme vetting is needed.
Mary says
Of course Germany is stressful it is full of muslims.
nicu says
thank you , Mary – I know many who would like to leave for good – including me for the Muslim invasion ! It’s so ridiculous what Seehofer says : he always talks and acts the other way around – and ” Syrians ” are not the only one who travel to their country for vacation : People from Eritrea do it most . We don’t need enemies – we have Merkel !
Ginny says
So true!
Tom says
On holiday ? To a place from which they were supposed to be fleeing for their very lives ?
What an absolute crock.
If living in Germany is stressful for the Syrian “refugees” just think how stressful it must be for the German women who fear walking the streets of their home towns in case they are swarmed and gang raped for wearing anything that reveals above their ankles.
Older Canadian says
Deport for taking vacations in the bcountry they are fleeing from. How about also deporting for crimes, or is that being too insensitive.
Allan Scott says
You’re kinda not a refugee when you go back to the place you “escaped” from to vacation!!!
jewdog says
Send them all back, and let Allah sort them out.
Lt Mason says
Strip them of their asylum status and make them citizens?
CRUSADER says
Leftists are seeking to control schools, media, and courts, as do stealth jihadists.
Devila Merkel — the social experimenter — would be taken with this young fellow ….
Ian Samuel, Harvard professor and former US Supreme Court assistant, advocates
“Socialism will win …”
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/29453-harvard-prof-wants-to-pack-scotus-with-leftists-says-socialism-will-win
Harvard Prof Wants to Pack SCOTUS With Leftists,
Says “Socialism Will Win!”
The Left has been apoplectic over President Trump’s opportunity to fill the Supreme Court seat of retiring justice Anthony Kennedy. Filmmaker Michael Moore even proposed surrounding the US Capitol to prevent it. But now a Harvard professor has his own idea: The next time Democrats seize Congress, they should increase the number of justices to enable a liberal president to pack the SCOTUS with leftists. And he apparently thinks this is a move that will help socialism “to win.”
As Harvard Law School lecturer Ian Samuel put it on Twitter June 27:
“Pack the courts as soon as we get the chance….
‘Pack the courts’ should be a phrase on par with ‘abolish ICE.’”
The next day he elaborated: “If the Democratic Party wins the 2020 election, it will have won the most votes in 7 out of the 8 previous national elections. Adding six members to create a fifteen-member Court, which would still have 5 GOP-appointed members, is actually incredibly generous to the Republicans.”
Note that this is entirely lawful. The Constitution doesn’t dictate a set number of SCOTUS justices; the figure is set statutorily by Congress.
Samuel then appeared on Fox News to defend his idea, a segment he ended with the rally cry “Socialism will win!” As Fox News Insider reported yesterday:
Appearing on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” Tuesday, Samuel said that the Supreme Court shouldn’t be partisan and subject to “ideological swings.”
He said, though, that his issue with the Supreme Court is that 14 of the last 18 justices have been appointed by Republican presidents.
“The balance on the Supreme Court is way out-of-whack with what people have voted for,” Samuel said, adding that in order to restore the court’s balance, it should be expanded in order to add more liberals.
The centrist Kennedy’s retirement will give Trump the opportunity to move the court solidly to the right, and a vacancy on the court could become a key issue in the midterm elections.
Carlson responded to Samuel by saying that polling data has shown that recent decisions by the Supreme Court have fallen within the center line of public opinion.
“Actually, there isn’t a problem other than [that] Democrats don’t get to do their will with the courts to the extent you wish they could,” he said.
Sadly, the above reflects an old observation made by philosopher G.K. Chesterton: “The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected.”
Note that even Fox talks of “centrist” Kennedy and how Trump can move the court “solidly right.” This language reinforces a dangerous misconception.
Speaking of the significance of whether a justice is “liberal,” “conservative,” or “centrist” makes as much sense as emphasizing whether a baseball umpire is liberal, conservative, or centrist.
As I explained June 28, “In neither case does the individual’s legitimate role involve imposing his own biases, but to apply the rules. These are found in baseball’s rulebook in the umpire’s case — in the Constitution in the judge’s.” To expand on this analogy, as I wrote last year:
Judges can in fact be likened to baseball umpires, while the players are the people, the game’s ruling body is the legislature, and the rule book is the Constitution.
Now, if a rule is thought inadequate, it’s the ruling body’s role to change it. Of course, the players, the umpires, or anyone else may lobby passionately in that regard. What, however, if an umpire considered the rule book living and said, “With the great pitchers in these times, three strikes are insufficient; I’m giving the batter four strikes”?
He’d be fired. And would it help his cause if he added an intellectual veneer to his cheating, saying, “You don’t understand! I’m not a radical like those originalists! I’m moderate — a pragmatist”?
No, he’s a bad umpire — and he’d be history.
Likewise, forget about conservative, liberal, and centrist judges; forget about “pragmatists,” “constructionists,” and “textualists.” Such terms are the fruits of pseudo-intellectualism and legal legerdemain and muddy the waters. There are only two kinds of judges.
Good judges and bad judges.
Today we have far too many of the latter, acting as an oligarchy and appointed and abetted by people who welcome this role as long as the court does their bidding. This power — to act as a super-legislature — is why SCOTUS appointments now inspire such hand-wringing and hellacious rhetoric. But there’s a simple solution to this, one that would render arguments about packing the court, and any successful efforts at doing so, irrelevant.
Reject the courts’ “role” as ultimate arbiter of law’s validity.
This is entirely lawful. Understand that judicial supremacy — the notion that the SCOTUS has the final say on law’s meaning and that its opinions must constrain all three governmental branches — is not granted to the courts by the Constitution. Rather, the courts declared this power for themselves, notably in the Marbury v. Madison decision (1803).
As for the Left, the fundamental problem it has isn’t with Trump’s SCOTUS picks — it’s that it hates the Constitution itself. Ask yourself, why would leftists object to justices who merely do their jobs and adhere to our national rule book (and liberals do thus object, despite their claims to the contrary)?
It’s because the Constitution is a conservative document.
First, by assigning most powers to the states, the Constitution mandates a degree of subsidiarity, the principle stating that tasks in civilization should be performed by the smallest possible entity that can do so. This contravenes the leftist aim to centralize power.
Even more fundamentally, however, the Constitution’s provisions — only alterable via the difficult Amendment Process — ensure a status quo. This, as I’ve explained in the past, aligns with conservatism’s only consistent definition: a desire to maintain the status quo. So it’s unsurprising that the document would be despised by adherents of modern liberalism, whose only consistent definition is a desire to change the status quo.
Of course, the Constitution serves its status-quo-maintenance role only if we actually abide by it. Thus do leftists have a lust affair with bad judges who’ll spin it like a whirling dervish with vertigo.
The Left certainly does hate President Trump, and it may even hate good justices. But what most Americans don’t realize, and what leftists themselves won’t yet admit, is that they hate the Constitution itself.
Video interview with Tucker Carlson ——
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw0GXScyB6M
Trick_or_Treat says
Just reading on to your very next words following on from your headline on this, I find that you have also taken my very next words right out of my mouth – regarding people who now want to go ‘happy holiday’ visiting the very places they have allegedly just previously ‘fled’ [supposedly seeking refuge and asylum] as ‘refugees’ and ‘asylum seekers’ from – and who had also heretofore been solemnly pleading things like, “I’ll be shot…”, or “arrested and tortured…”, or “murdered…”, or “dissappeared…”, or “persecuted…” (nah, nah, nah), and all the other now tired old lines…the very moment they are repatriated, in their charade quest (taqqiyya?) to receive official ‘refugee’ or ‘asylum seeker’ status. [usual next step after that is: “Please, I ask it for you, take me, and ask it for him me Social Security office please?!”].
Well, at least Australia, in general, has not [quite] reached that level of sheer stupidity and gullibility [should I say, ‘yet’?] Where it concerns people [fully intending migration] who have deliberately ‘country-hopped’ their way, half way around the world, and through multiple countries (and not so ignorantly bypassing multiple Australian Embassies or consular missions in the process, BTW) with the full covert intention of Australia being their destination of choice. The final ‘leg’ of their very expensive and convoluted migration strategy being to arrive somewhere on our northern shores, via payed people smuggler boat from neighbouring Indonesia, under the SCAM of the ‘refugee’ / ‘asylum seeker’ flags!
And this is one of the reasons (but not the only one) that the Australian Labor Party lost, big-time, and took such a severe and embarrassing drubbing, in the recent Federal Election – All the supremely gullible, lefty, bleeding heart, ‘easy-touches’ shouting their mantras of, “Oh, the poor dear things”, “don’t close our gates”, “we must accept them and let them in”, and “we have International legal obligations”, etc, blah, blah,blah – and seem to be totally oblivious to the fact that they (and therefore the rest of us by default) are being ‘led down the garden path’ by our nose, and played like a bloody Stradivarius!
Don’t get me wrong, Australia has, in times past, very willingly and cheerfully accepted and taken in many many refugees who have fled to our shores seeking asylum – like the Vietnamese, and later the East Timorese, from not too far across the water from us, and who were in fact, quite genuinely fleeing the most dire and deadly circumstances. The latter [the East Timorese] from the former Portuguese territory so brutally and muderously annexed by Dictator Suharto’s Indonesia, being nearly all very devoutly Christian.
Just about all these peoples have very gratefully ACCEPTED, ADAPTED,and ASSIMILATED into Australian society, and have become good, hard working and patriotic Australian citizens, and many have become quite successful and noted business people.
BTW, just what on earth would possess anybody at the moment to go on a bloody ‘holiday’ in Syria? I think I’d much sooner accept an invite to an all-in shit-fight at the local sewerage treatment works!
Mung Shuonglun says
Muslims never assimilate. Even if assimilate they did it so to settle down and overpopulated in 5he future
elee says
Muslim Erdogan tells millions of German Turks to never assimilate and to have tens of millions of Muslim babies, and then calls the Germans “Nazis” for not giving him a big platform to tell German Muslims how to vote in German elections. It’s kind of like doublethink, but minus the “think” portion. He’s a Muslim world leader, loved and revered from Morocco to Malaysia.
CRUSADER says
Double Bladed sword ⚔️ as in Mohamhead’s son in law Ali’s “Zulfiqar” — vertebrae snapping scissored scimitar?
elee says
“My regular gig is being a refugee in Germany but I come back here on vacations.” That’s almost as logical as subsidising jihadis who haven’t moved for three generations as “refugees.” Quit paying jizya.
Giacomo Latta says
”something very important got in the way”
Like what? A trip to Disneyland?
infidel says
This is a clear statement that the Germans, esp MAD MAAMA MERKEL, have been had by these vile creatures…. But the galling part is how this creature says that life in Germany is stressful after sucking off all the benefits from the hosts.. Expect this creature to enter German politics in the future.
Ginger Snap says
Normal people realized the migration in 2015 was a scam. Why else would mostly young men go to Europe at home in a dangerous country, while the men went to Europe? The fighting age men were not in their home country to fight for their freedom. The women were there under the ‘horrible’ conditions. It should have been the other way around! This is not brain surgery, but most people don’t understand this was a plan. Some Muslims were pawns and may have no idea what was going on. That was by design too to get larger numbers of people fleeing Syria. It sure is kinky that this happened all of a sudden when Syria has been like this for years. This is social jihad pure and simple. They lie about why they went to Europe, because the Koran says they may lie to promote Mohammed, a man who had epilepsy and had hallucinations. Social jihad starts in seemingly simple ways. When people notice it is social jihad, it is too late. Wake up America! The handwriting is on the wall here!!!
gravenimage says
Yes–when have able-bodied solo military-aged men *ever* made up most of a refugee stream? This is insanity–refugees are usually women, children, old people, and those with disabilities. The few young men usually have families they are taking care of.
This is an invasion–these are not refugees.
Ole Pederson says
He is the minister of announcements.
… you guessed it, do nothing.
tim gallagher says
I suppose you have to say that any slight toughening of pathetic politicians in Germany and other countries is a good sign, but this is pretty pathetic. The Visegrad countries say, no, we’re not having any Muslims, which is the right way to go, while you get pathetic moves like this where “refugees” who go back for a holiday in the Muslim country they supposedly fled in danger, might be expelled. Orban and the other Visegrad country leaders are showing the correct path, but it requires courage, and these politicians in western Europe seem like gutless, pathetic weasels in comparison. Let’s face it, these politicians in most western European countries are pathetically weak. They are just wishy washy human beings. I can’t see them ever developing the courage to do the right and necessary things to save western Europe from the Muslim invasion, although Salvini, Wilders , Le Pen and Waters (in the UK) do display the necessary courage.