U.S Rep. Ilhan Omar presents herself as a practicing Muslim — she wears a head-covering out of religious conviction, talks proudly of her Muslim heritage, speaks at fundraisers for the Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) and often seems to take the side of Islamic regimes over against U.S. interests. (Notably, she has praised her native Somalia, defended Hamas leadership over its rocket attacks on Israel and sided with the mullahs of Iran over against the present foreign policy actions of the United States.)
Yet, at the same time, she wishes to be seen as a progressive Democrat. So she stands as a proud feminist even though Islam as a worldwide movement is the greatest oppressor of women ever to control human behavior patterns. She claims to be a staunch supporter of LGBTQ rights, even though Shari’a law commands that those declared guilty of homosexual behavior must be executed — this is based on three passages in the Qur’an (7.80-84; 26.165-166, and 4.16) and numerous Hadith traditions such as this one from Sunan Abu Dawud 4462:
The Messenger of Allah said, “Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot [Lot] (i.e., the people of Sodom), execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.”
The conflict between settled Islamic law and Western leftist values is inescapable, but it is nonetheless ignored by both Muslim and secular progressives alike so they may harmoniously band together to destroy a larger, common enemy: traditional Western culture founded upon a biblical worldview and ethic. Hence, Ilhan Omar and so many others are able to live a lie without batting an eyelash or being challenged in their hypocrisy.
Omar’s past life is coming under increasing scrutiny as she dwells in the public spotlight. One area of special interest is her marriage history. She has been married and divorced two times, is married once again but apparently has recently filed for divorce a third time. In our present culture this is not all that unusual, sadly, but it is even more acceptable in Muslim circles since marriage is treated solely as a legal contract, not as the lifelong partnership/covenant envisioned in the Bible. What is a bit surprising, however, is the freedom Omar has had in initiating her divorces. Under Islamic law the husband can procure a divorce instantly for almost any reason, but the wife is extremely limited in her capacity to seek legal exit from the marriage.
Omar’s marital history is a bit complicated, particularly if she claims to submit to Shari’a, as any good Muslim must. Here’s a timeline of her marriages and divorces, according to civil and legal documents:
- 2002 — Islamic religious marriage to Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi
-
-
- They have two children before divorcing
-
-
- 2008 — They are divorced according to Shari’a law
- 2009 — A few months after the divorce, Omar marries Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in a state-sanctioned ceremony.
-
-
- no children come from this union; apparently Hirsi, Omar and Elmi all live together in the same house for the next two years.
- questions have been raised about whether Elmi and Omar are brother and sister, and the marriage was arranged “for immigration reasons.” Omar denies this.
-
-
- 2011 — Omar separates from Elmi in a religious ceremony but does not file for legal divorce.
- 2012 — Within a few months by Islamic ceremony she enters into a remarriage with Hirsi. Their third child, Ilwad, is born June 11, 2012. You can do the math for yourself.
- 2017 — Omar files for legal divorce from Elmi late in the year.
- 2018 — Divorce is granted early in the year. One month later, she marries Hirsi in a civil ceremony.
A few things stand out at first glance. From the perspective of Shari’a law, although a Muslim man can have up to four wives concurrently, a Muslim woman can be married to only one Muslim man at a time. Marriages contracted among Muslims, whether civil or religious, are recognized by Islamic courts as valid.
Though Omar has attempted to spin her merry-go-round marriages as “religious/cultural” or “legal”, her distinctions fall flat. As a Muslim entering into a religious marriage before Allah, she must consider that marriage even more legitimate than one merely solemnized before the State. Otherwise she places a human authority above Allah. Likewise, if she dismisses her first union with Hirsi as only an affair, not a “true” marriage, then according to Shari’a law, she and Hirsi are guilty of repeated fornication (the penalty for which is death by stoning) and the children of this relationship are ever in a state of disgrace.
If, on the other hand, she recognizes her relationship with Hirsi as a true marriage, then according to Shari’a, when they are irrevocably divorced (which is accomplished with a threefold declaration by the husband of “talaq”) they cannot be remarried until Omar has been married to another man, consummated that marriage with a sexual union, and then been irrevocably divorced from that husband. At that point she would be able to remarry her first husband Hirsi.
This bizarre arrangement stems from “revelation” in the Qur’an found in Sura 2:230 —
After a divorce for the third time, it is not lawful for the husband to resume marital relations with her or remarry her until she has been married and divorced by another husband. In that case, there is no sin for the former husband to marry her if they (both) think that they can abide by the law. These are the laws of God. He explains them for the people of knowledge. (Sarwar trans.)
That the wife in this case must have engaged in sex with the second husband bef0re being divorced and remarried to the first husband is confirmed by a hadith tradition found three times in Sahih Bukhari (7.72.715; 7.63.187; 8.73.107) as well as in al-Muwatta Imam Malik (28.7.17). Here’s the version from Bukhari 7.72.715:
Narrated ‘Ikrima: Rifa’a divorced his wife whereupon ‘AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. ‘Aisha [Muhammad’s young and favorite wife] said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (‘Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s Apostle came, ‘Aisha said, “I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!” When ‘AbdurRahman heard that his wife had gone to the Prophet, he came with his two sons from another wife. She said, “By Allah! I have done no wrong to him but he is impotent and is as useless to me as this,” holding and showing the fringe of her garment, ‘Abdur-Rahman said, “By Allah, O Allah’s Apostle! She has told a lie! I am very strong and can satisfy her but she is disobedient and wants to go back to Rifa’a.” Allah’s Apostle said, to her, “If that is your intention, then know that it is unlawful for you to remarry Rifa’a unless Abdur-Rahman has had sexual intercourse with you.” Then the Prophet saw two boys with ‘Abdur-Rahman and asked (him), “Are these your sons?” On that ‘AbdurRahman said, “Yes.” The Prophet said, “You claim what you claim (i.e., that he is impotent)? But by Allah, these boys resemble him as a crow resembles a crow.”
The woman in question seeks release from her second marriage so she can go back to her first husband. Apparently, her present husband is physically abusive (she is sporting deep bruises from his beatings, as Muhammad’s wife ‘Aisha points out to the prophet). Additionally, she claims he is impotent and cannot satisfy her sexually, meaning their marriage had never been consummated. The husband, ‘Abdur-Rahman, learning that his wife had gone to the prophet to complain, rushed over to defend himself and his marriage. Disputing her charge of impotence, he claimed that she was rebellious toward him and only wanted to return to her first husband. Muhammad completely overlooks the issue of physical abuse by ‘Abdur-Rahman (after all, the Qur’an gives license to the husband to beat his wife or wives if he “fears rebellion” from them and they have not responded favorably to lesser punishments (see 4:34)), and deals only with the wife’s desire to divorce ‘Abdur- Rahman in order to return to Rifa’a, her first husband. He makes it clear that she is “stuck” with Abdur-Rahman until she allows him to consummate the marriage with her, after which point he can divorce her and she can be permissibly remarried to her first husband.
This arrangement has come to be known as “nikah halala” or “nikah hilla”. The Arabic word “nikah” literally means sexual intercourse, but more largely refers to the institution of marriage, to which intercourse is largely confined (except for sex slaves and those raped licitly during jihad, according to Shari’a law). “Halala” and “hilla” come from the same Arabic root word used to designate permissible foods to eat (halal) over against forbidden ones (haram). So, nikah halala means “permitted or licit sex” and has come to designate a marriage entered into specifically so as to make a divorced woman “permissible” for her first husband to marry once again, after she has been “enjoyed” sexually by another man in an intervening marriage. In fact, in Islamic Arabic parlance, the intervening husband is known as a “muhallil” (also from the same root for halal), which means “one who makes permissible/lawful.”
Sadly, in some parts of the Muslim world this has turned into something of a cottage industry with men hiring themselves out as muhallils, all in “a humanitarian effort” to reunite couples divorced through a husband’s impetuous and hotheaded “triple talaq” (talaq is the Arabic word for divorce, and when a husband repeats it three times in succession to his wife, she is immediately and irrevocably divorced). If he regrets his hasty act and wants to keep his wife, his only recourse is to find a muhallil who will marry his wife, sleep with her at least once, and then agree to divorce her immediately.
According to Shari’a law as found in one popular manual (Reliance of the Traveller), such a “one night stand” kind of marriage is not valid, if the purpose of the sham marriage is only to allow a divorced couple to remarry. But there is a way around this legally — as long as that purpose is not explicitly stipulated in the written marriage contract, then the nikah halala is legal:
m6.12 The following types of marriage are legally invalid:
…
(3) or to marry a woman after her threefold divorce solely to cohabit and thus permit her (dis: n7.7) to remarry her previous husband (A: which is an enormity (dis: p29)), though if the marriage agreement is made for this reason but does not expressly stipulate it, then it is legally valid (dis: c5.2).
So, with regard to practicing Muslim Ilhan Omar, who married and divorced Ahmed Hirsi (2002-08), and then married him again in 2012, such a remarriage would only be allowed to them if she had married and been sexually active with another husband in the intervening years. Omar asserts that this is indeed the case, as she legally married Ahmed Elmi in 2009. However, there are significant questions as to the legality of this marriage since there is growing evidence that Elmi may in fact be Omar’s full brother (from the same parents). If that is the case, then Omar and Elmi might not have consummated the relationship — it would have been a marriage only on paper, to grant him legal status in the USA and the ability to quickly pursue a college degree (which he did). However, if the marriage was never consummated, then Omar’s remarriage to Hirsi would be forbidden according to Islamic law. On the other hand, if she and Elmi did consummate their marriage and are in fact sister and brother, then they would be guilty of incest, a crime in America and a major sin in Islam. Such a marriage would not be regarded as valid by Shari’a law, and would again not qualify as “nikah halala”. In this case, her subsequent remarriage to Hirsi would also be forbidden.
Read the rest here.
Fred Dawes says
Most Muslims HAVE No idea who her or his Father is most have no idea what right or wrong is and no idea what Good or evil is.
Muhammed Alhagie says
Every human being have a parent except three, and everyone have a negative side,, but we can conquer evil only after purification of the body, the heart and the soul. Mahrifa !
FYI says
Yes let us conquer EVIL.
But let’s look at omar’s pagan Arab cult with its islamic “morality”..
OK with murder k4:191
OK with adultery with enslaved women k33:50
OK with stealing k48:20
OK with bearing false witness k3:28
OK with child brides,k65:4polygamyk4:3
OK with rape sunan abu dawud vol 2 hadith 2155
OK with hatred toward others{=violation of the Second Chief Commandment lev19:18
OK with breaking God’s Official commandments{=violation of the First Chief commandment}
The devout muslim:”commandments,what commandments?”
Follow allah’s unwitting advice in k10:94 and consult those who have the Bible
EXODUS 20 V1-17 God’s Actual Laws which clearly condemn such koranic wickedness.
Can the primitive,intellectually and theologically challenged muslim understand that if allah teaches the OPPOSITE to God’s Laws and teaches disobedience to them that allah is a false god?
Nope.
Not a snowball’s chance in hell..
al LAH’s “perfect” book contains egregious errors{theological,logical,scientific} proving it to be IMPERFECT thus failing allah’s criterion test of k4:82 meaning the koran is.. FALSE.
al LAH’s “prophet” was the most obvious false prophet in History;a mass murdering[abu dawud 4390}African slave trading{sahih muslim 3901} self-confessed fraud{al tabari 6:111}who failed the Poison Test meaning muhammed was.. FALSE
Omar wears her hijab in honor of an arab god whose prophet said her value is only HALF that of a man{k2:282}due to what muhammed{APFh,allah prays for his lost soul}was “the deficiency of a woman’s mind”.she is only HALF a man to allah!
No surprise she is an immoral creature:islam is an immoral pagan Arab cult based on the sunnah of a child raping liar “prophet”and a god who admits to being a champion deceiver k3;54
some muslims can figure it out:they are the ones that leave.
The ones that remain prove the point that islam is not for intelligent people.
Sure let’s fight EVIL;the unholy,commandment-of-God violating koran,its pedophile “prophet” and its false god al LAH. with his Doctrine of HATE al walaa wal baraa
Barbie says
OMG! Too Much!
gravenimage says
You can’t conquer evil if you adhere to a creed that teaches persecution, rape, enslavement, and mass slaughter.
will says
This chick wears a scarf of ‘ MODESTY ‘ yet there isn’t enough cheap fabric in the world to mask a dark hateful heart ……
gravenimage says
So true, Will.
CogitoErgoSum says
The woman is a weasel. When will the weasel go pop?
jimmy rooks says
Last year was too late!?
Bezelel says
Sort of damned if she did and damned if she didn’t. Everywhere except by thr DNC and enemedia
Myles says
The traitor Trump, is a Russian stooge. What is your point?
Wellington says
Myles: There is ZERO evidence that Trump is a Russian stooge. None. If you can provide any, produce it (N.B., Even Mueller and his team of Democrats couldn’t, so please enlighten us all what you know that even the witch hunt which was the Mueller investigation could not).
In fact, Trump has put more sanctions on Russia than several immediate past predecessors in the Oval Office have.
You know, if one is still on the Russian collusion hoax, one is a fool. You come to mind.
icur1096 says
Well put Wellington
Ignacio Rosas says
I concur with your response
Lainey61 says
Well said Wellington! I can’t believe Myles or anyone else for that matter is still going on about “Trump’s collusion with Russia” bull sh*t. If Myles had any sense he would do a bit of investigating into the REAL “Russia Collusion” with Obama and even more so with Hillary Clinton! Or better yet the filthy, criminal deeds involving the Clinton’s and possibly even the Obama’s with regard to the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile/sex slave debacle!
CARMEN says
Spot on Wellington! Spot on. People continue to believe the lies because THEY choose to. They wouldnt know the truth if it slapped them in the face. The Demonicrats know exactly how to get the gullible and ignorant people on their side because they DONT RESEARCH ANYTHING. You just spit it out and they run with it. How do I know this FOR A FACT, you might ask??? Well I was one of them too. I was taught that the Demonicrats were for the less privileged and the Republicans for the rich. My thought today is: Demonicrats want to keep you stupid and poor and the Republican’s want you to stand up for yourself, get off your ass and make something of yourself. The problem with a lot of todays society is that they are lazy and want want want!
gravenimage says
Fine post, Wellington.
CogitoErgoSum says
Overstock CEO is recruited by X, Y and Z of the Deep State to spy on Russian spy who is spying on Trump so X,Y and Z can discredit Trump so the candidate that X,Y and Z already control through blackmail (i.e, Hillary via Jeffrey Epstein) can be elected.
I know, call me crazy.
CRUSADER says
True enough, we shall see.
Stay tuned!
……………….
Also, curious what Michelle Malkin comes up with
in her new book exposure:
“Open Borders Inc.: Who’s Funding America’s Destruction?”
Follow the money, find the truth. That’s Michelle Malkin’s journalistic mantra, and in her stunning new book, Open Borders Inc., she puts it to work with a shocking, comprehensive exposé of who’s behind our immigration crisis.
In the name of compassion—but driven by financial profit—globalist elites, Silicon Valley, and the radical Left are conspiring to undo the rule of law, subvert our homeland security, shut down free speech, and make gobs of money off the backs of illegal aliens, refugees, and low-wage guest workers.
Politicians want cheap votes or cheap labor. Church leaders want pew-fillers and collection plate donors. Social justice militants, working with corporate America, want to silence free speech they deem “hateful,” while raking in tens of millions of dollars promoting mass, uncontrolled immigration both legal and illegal.
Malkin names names—from Pope Francis to George Clooney, from George Soros to the Koch brothers, from Jack Dorsey to Tim Cook and Mark Zuckerberg. Enlightening as it is infuriating, Open Borders Inc. reveals the powerful forces working to erase America.
—— By the way, David Koch (RIP?)
https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/commentary/david-koch-amazon-rain-forest-fires-20190825.html
Oilman David Koch set the world on fire, then died and left us to face the rising flames ?
David Koch led a remarkable life in which he and his brother Charles — the legendary or notorious, depending upon your politics, Koch brothers — turned their right-wing oilman daddy’s fortune into untold billions. They made so much money that David could give some away to pet causes like the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) while electing the ultra-conservatives who wished to destroy it. But when he died Friday at age 79, David Koch had only lived to see the early stages of his greatest creation.
We’ll never know if Koch — who’d been reportedly ill these last few years and had retired from energy giant Koch Industries, one of the world’s largest private companies — was aware that his final days on an increasingly endangered planet Earth included the hottest recorded month since humans invented thermometers, Greenland’s biggest known ice melt, insane summer temperatures in Europe’s capitals, with the world enveloped in flames from Alaska to Siberia to finally, and most alarmingly, the Amazon rain forests of Brazil, the so-called “world’s lungs” now suffering from emphysema.
We do know this, however: David Koch — like his entire generation of greedy oil and coal barons and all the shortsighted politicians who grabbed for their white envelopes of cash at gin-soaked fundraisers — almost certainly knew he would die before his three late-in-life kids, as well as my children and yours, would have to face the flooding, the rising seas, the droughts and all the mass migrations and violence that come with that, as well as a great extinction of species. Instead of using their billions to fix it, they purchased the gaslight of denial to convince the masses it wasn’t happening.
Harry Truman said famously, asked for a comment on the passing of a longtime political nemesis, that “it’s a damn shame when anyone dies.” And so it was a damn shame when David Koch finally passed — and my sympathies to his family and the people who knew him. He was certainly a complicated figure, who claimed that surviving a 1991 airline runway crash (35 people died) changed his life and did give away billions to popular nonpolitical causes, most notably cancer research.
CRUSADER says
…
But 99.9 percent of us didn’t know David Koch; we’ve only had to deal with the vast public influence of a man whose greatest impact was his belief that freedom was just another word for a completely unfettered brand of capitalism where there were no environmental protections for the world whose resources Koch Industries so rapaciously extracted, and no pity for a dying middle class. There should be no waiting period to discuss David Koch and his legacy, not when the thick smoke from the burning Amazon is blotting out the Sao Paulo skyline.
The Koch brothers inherited their free-market-on-Viagra politics from their dad, Fred Koch, who not only founded Wichita-based Koch Industries but helped launch the notorious right-wing-extremist John Birch Society, which believed that Communists were fluoridating your water and that Dwight Eisenhower was a secret agent of Moscow. His sons put a barely kinder-and-gentler face on such radicalism, with David Koch running for vice president on the Libertarian Party ticket in 1980 because apparently Ronald Reagan was too liberal for them.
Multiple books and articles — including the seminal work of The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer — have been written about the political influence of the Koch brothers. But the newest — Kochland, by Christopher Leonard — sheds important fresh light on the issue at hand: Denial of the science of global warming. Leonard revealed how the Koch brothers sprung into action in 1991, when a Republican president, George H.W. Bush, seemed likely to win passage of a so-called cap-and-trade program that would have curbed greenhouse gas pollution as well as Koch Industries profits.
While today’s climate crisis almost certainly requires more radical measures than cap and trade, such a move would have at least put the GOP on record in acknowledging man-made global warming and that Washington has a role to play in reducing it. The Koch brothers — with an estimated net worth of $120 billion built on aggressive oil exploitation, even if it meant allegedly sucking up oil unlawfully from under Native American reservations — weren’t going to let that happen.
The same year, the Cato Institute — a libertarian think tank heavily funded by and reflecting the views of the Koch brothers — sponsored an event called “Global Environmental Crisis: Science or Politics?” that laid the foundations of climate-crisis denial and brought in key skeptics of the increasingly established science such as MIT meteorologist Richard Lindzen. The successful killing of the cap-and-trade proposal was also the launching of their decades-long war against science.
The power and notoriety of David and Charles Koch peaked in the late 2000s and early 2010s, when the election of Barack Obama as president, a sliver of remaining moderate Republicans who believed in climate action, and more indisputable evidence of a warming planet again posed a perceived threat to the brothers and their fossil-fuel regime. In those years, the Kochs spent hundreds of millions of dollars either on campaign contributions to climate deniers and their fellow travelers or to fund the “grassroots” Americans for Prosperity, which whipped up the frenzy that was the Tea Party.
Interestingly, the Koch brothers largely didn’t support Donald Trump, but the monsters they created had already escaped from the lab. The foundations of radical free-market politics — fostering distrust of educated elites to convince the masses to reject science, turning to religious fundamentalism to get working-class folks to vote against their economic interests — morphed into the angry, other-hating far-right populism that gave us Trump.
The same kind of politics that gave us Brazil’s new right-wing president, Jair Bolsonaro.
Bolsonaro took office in January — after running a hate-filled campaign that tripled down on homophobia as well as his affinity for the legacy of his homeland’s history of authoritarian coups — with a pro-development agenda that not only mocked environmental protection but gutted the regulatory agencies tasked with enforcing it. That sounds crazy radical but honestly it’s little different from the governing principles of the Koch-funded Republican Party that has controlled at least one branch of U.S. government for 16 of the last 18 years and dominates our courts.
Like Trump, Bolsonaro is the bastard child of free-market Kochism run amok. As Vox noted in a recent analysis, climate denial — with its distrust of scientific elites and global cooperation such as the Paris climate accords — goes hand-in-glove with far-right nationalism. In Brazil, the effects have been rapid and catastrophic. Experts say that wildfires primarily in the Amazon and adjacent rain forests have nearly doubled so far in 2019, and the pro-land-clearing green light from the autocrat in Brasilia that some have dubbed “Captain Chainsaw” seems to be the primary cause.
The Amazon forests have performed a valuable task for humankind: Absorbing excess carbon from the atmosphere and storing it. Not only are the growing wildfires reducing that ability, but the flames are releasing millions of tons of this stored carbon (and other pollutants) back into the atmosphere. At a time when Earth just experienced its hottest month in July and when Arctic ice melting is decades ahead of earlier dire predictions, it’s impossible to overstate the threat to civilization of this rapid downward spiral — all triggered by the awful authoritarian politics of Bolsonaro’s Brazil.
Bolsonaro (64), Trump (73), Charles Koch (83) and the recently departed David Koch are part of the most cynical generational ploy in the history of civilization. If a majority of the world’s climate scientists are right and we’re fast running out of time to prevent the loss of biodiversity and the human hardships that will be triggered by fire, flood and drought, none of them will be alive to see what they’ve wrought. To them, the certainty of the massive profits from exploiting fossil fuels, or winning an election, was worth the accelerating risks, even to their own grandchildren.
Already, the generation of those grandkids is desperately trying to save the world from the mess that the Koch brothers and their ilk have made. It’s teenagers and even “tweens” like Sweden’s Greta Thunberg and the Americans Alexandria Villaseñor and Isaac Harte who’ve taken the lead on organizing a badly needed global climate strike on September 20. They’ve joined with others in supporting the Green New Deal, a radical plan for ending carbon pollution that probably would have been less radical if the world had acted in 1991 instead of falling again and again for the lazy downhill politics of denial.
Now, today’s young generation is trying to save a house that’s already on fire. I’d say that it’s fitting that David Koch shuffled off this mortal coil in the exact same week that the Amazon finally caught on fire uncontrollably — but it’s more than just fitting. It seems this was the plan all along.
—————————
Bezelel says
Myles of crap
Wellington says
That’s funny.
Bezelel says
(insert smiley face here) I haven’t mastered emoji’s yet
somehistory says
Bezelel,
: and ) make a smiley face if typed next to each other…without a space between. 🙂
gravenimage says
Brilliant!
Angemon says
“The traitor Trump, is a Russian stooge.”
Silly Myles, there’s no T, R, U or P in Obama:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mgQaFlo_p8
jimmy rooks says
EXACTLY!…SHRILLARY’S the one who PERSONALLY approved the sale of OUR uranium to Russia and somehow TRUMP’S the one “colluding” with them?!…Logic’s not a strength for Leftists, is it?!
Clarino says
As with so many of these people, her behaviour has absolutely nothing to do with conviction or religion. It is all about acquiring and exercising power and using other peoples’ convictions to give her behaviour legitimacy.
Calling it hypocrisy does not go half way to descibing it.
Wellington says
The best that can be said about Omar is that she is a deeply confused human being. I mean here profoundly confused.
The worst that can be said about her is that she is so consciously opposed to liberty, equality under the law, Israel’s very existence, women’s rights, all non-Muslims, and Western Civilization at its finest (which is DIRECTLY opposed to Islam at its “finest”), that she is indeed a fifth columnist of the first order.
The first possibility is bad enough and not conducive to freedom. The second is destructive in the extreme and most definitely conducive to the ending of freedom. Take your pick.
For reasons of logic, common sense, what experience can teach a person, what accurate knowledge can teach a person, ethics, self-preservation and simply gauging the odds, I side with the latter option—but even assuming the first option, this woman is nevertheless deep bad news for many good things. In short, whichever way one figures it (assuming one is not a fool—and sadly so many are), Omar in NO WAY helps the best that mankind is capable of and can only aid the worst mankind has produced—like the freedom-crushing belief (among so much other rot like the child-like vision of the afterlife) which is Islam.
Angemon says
Omar should be the most interested party in putting this issue to rest. Why has she not done so yet?
gravenimage says
Ilhan Omar and the Revolving Doors of Marriage
…………………..
So much for the always ludicrous belief that Islam is about family values.
somehistory says
Compare her behavior with what is written in the Bible about the behavior satan encourages: Galatians 5:19-21: “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like:
http://www.gods-word-first.org/bible-study/works-of-the-flesh-explained.
Anything the desert rat, mass murdering raper of children wanted to do was okay with his fake god, satan.
If a male divorced his wife, saw her with another male and became jealous, he could get his wife back by eliminating the new husband. Why not bribe the new guy with some camels, stolen coins, or a knife to the throat?
omar saw that her brother needed her help to get into the U.S. without doing so legally. She had no love for the guy to whom she was not married to, but married to, and with whom she had children, so she tossed him aside…and still lived with him…in order to get her brother into the country.
She saw no problem with this and neither did the two husbands…because the murderer and raper of children would have given it his okay.
omar’s brother-husband told of seeing his children being born…describing omar’s body parts. Who does that? How disgusting these immoral creatures are!
Bezelel says
Reminds me of this tune https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYlJH81dSiw
Except the song doesn’t claim to be socially acceptable. 🙂
gravenimage says
I remember that song from the Dr. Demento show…
Bezelel says
I might change my name to smiley, Thanks somehistory 🙂
I haven’t heard the Dr Demento show since the 80’s
somehistory says
You are welcome. 🙂 I once worked with a guy who called me ‘smiley.’ He never would say why.
somehistory says
I remember that from when I was much younger. Much thanks for the charge to my memory. I always laughed and tonight, it does me good.:)
gravenimage says
Yes–it was a lot of fun. 🙂
Don McKellar says
CLEARLY this is a case which must raise red flags with government agencies! Why has she not been arrested along with her brother? Should they not be compelled by a court to do DNA tests to settle this matter? This has fraud written all over it.
tim gallagher says
Reading about Omar’s marriage set-up, my reaction is that, morally, she seems to be a complete grub and an opportunist. However, I guess that that is when you compare her bizarre former arrangement (including marriage to her brother) to the standards we normally have in western, civilised nations. I think anything seems to go for Muslims, as long as it advances their rotten goals, which is surely what this woman is all about. Muslims would probably not be bothered by her behaviour as long as she is pushing their cause against the hated infidels.
gravenimage says
I think her marriage to her brother was likely an immigration scam. This itself should have been enough to get her deported.
CogitoErgoSum says
Yes, I think it started with an immigration scam and then another scam to get her brother into a college in the U.S.
gravenimage says
Yes.
tim gallagher says
gravenimage and CogitoErgoSum, her actions do seem to have indicated a pretty low, corrupt kind of character. Definitely a scam artist. Is there any chance that she will actually be deported or, at least, thrown out of office or is she very much a protected species? Can’t “victimise” the Muslims after all, can we? Does the area that elected her to Congress have a large percentage of Muslims? (like, say, 20% or more). Here in Australia, there are a couple of electorates in Sydney (probably in Melbourne as well) with well over 20% of their populations who are Muslim. I don’t know enough about how she got elected (though I did a quick check of her story on Wikipedia) but I am a bit surprised that the Democratic Party couldn’t come up with a better candidate. She does seem like a monumental troublemaker, along with having a shabby character.
gravenimage says
Probably not. I hope at the least that she is voted out next year.
CRUSADER says
Not very ethical, pious behavior…but at least she’s purdy!
As they say on Monty Python:
“I think she’s got nice leggs!”
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/1a32cdb4-1d1f-449d-837c-04d22895a5da
Bezelel says
Her brother dad uncles and cousins will agree with you
gravenimage says
Ewwwww….
Dave says
I have no idea if she is carrying on an affair with her Campaign Advisor or not (husband moved out, romantic dinners at obscure restaurants with the new guy, hand-holding in public etc) but, if she is, surely she must know that under Islamic Law a married Muslim woman being unfaithful to her husband must be put to death by stoning?
Robert says
Ms. Omar’s personal life has nothing to do with anything… she was elected by the public (which is power in itself) to do a job and I think she is doing an amazing job…
Larry says
The fact is she was elected by a bunch of illegals turned loose in her district by Obummer,,,, i guess that means nothing!!!!
MJP says
But it does the agenda she is pursuing Sharia Law, Defunding Israel, & converting the US to barbaric Society like the one she came from if you are for that then I guess she is doing a good job
Chrid Mcpeck says
We can solved all this. Just with on blood test. Omar. And her first and second husband has to submit to a blood test. And if one has the same DNA. Then she must be brought to justice. On American land .And his college degree must be revoked. Let’s see out law makers do there jobs. And clear her name or put her in prison
my guess is she won’t give a blood test and they won’t too but !! There is always away. To get there DNA. this is America not the desert.
gravenimage says
I don’t know if you could find a judge that would order a DNA test.
Lee Ward says
CONFUSED BY IT ALL says:
As if this mess is not big enough, I just read that Omar’s squad pal, Rashida Tlaib, had been married to a relative of her own mother. Let’s see! That could be either her father, her grandfather, her brother, her uncle, or her cousin. Just one big bed of incest! That explains their craziness — their insanity.
Muhammed Alhagie Ndong says
Islam is a religion of peace with a vast knowledge of the entire universe. The first verse that came down to human beings is ( Iqra ) meaning LEARN. With knowledge can we meet the demands of our needs and function in the best of our ability.
Saria laws are only to help human beings to live without fear ,and to justify our deeds. Every family, community, and country have a law that bind and justify over their deeds .
Many have attribute their culture and traditions to Islam and do so much fail not understanding Mahrifa.
Throughout the whole Qur’an their is not a verse that is asking Muslims to be violent. Don’t hurt no one with your hands or your tongues it explains.
Evil can we conquer from the body, the heart and the soul.
Angemon says
“Islam is a religion of peace with a vast knowledge of the entire universe. ”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POJdu4HV-Ng
“Throughout the whole Qur’an their is not a verse that is asking Muslims to be violent. ”
Yes, I’m sure “slay the unbelievers” means “cuddle the unbelievers”…
quran 4:74 – Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.
4:76 – Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (Satan, etc.). So fight you against the friends of Shaitan (Satan).
4:89 – They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.
4:95 – Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward.
CogitoErgoSum says
The first time Gabriel appeared to Muhammad the angel supposedly said “read” or perhaps “recite” or maybe even “proclaim.” All of those commands can be obeyed without learning a thing. Those commands can be accomplished through memorization — which is why the Surahs in the Quran were rearranged and placed out of chronological order — as an aid to rote memorization but which, as a result, actually inhibits learning.
gravenimage says
Muhammed Alhagie Ndong wrote:
Islam is a religion of peace with a vast knowledge of the entire universe.
…………………………….
Yeah–how is “slay the unbelievers wherever you find them” (Qur’an 9:5) anything but peaceful? How is the perfect man of Islam the “Prophet” Muhammed, who was a warlord, caravan-raider, pedophile, slaver, rapist, and mass-murderer anything but peaceful? How are those 35,000+ Jihad terror attacks anything but peaceful? sarc/off
More:
The first verse that came down to human beings is ( Iqra ) meaning LEARN. With knowledge can we meet the demands of our needs and function in the best of our ability.
…………………………….
Given that Islam teaches wife-beating, persecution, and the slaughter of anyone who doesn’t submit to Islam, that’s a bit questionable…
More:
Saria laws are only to help human beings to live without fear ,and to justify our deeds. Every family, community, and country have a law that bind and justify over their deeds .
…………………………….
Well, you can “live without fear” under the horrors of Shari’ah so long as you are not a woman, an unbeliever, gay, a minority-sect Muslim, or any sort of free thinker. If you are any of these things, you may well wind up hanged, thrown off a tall building, or stoned to death.
More:
Many have attribute their culture and traditions to Islam and do so much fail not understanding Mahrifa.
Throughout the whole Qur’an their is not a verse that is asking Muslims to be violent. Don’t hurt no one with your hands or your tongues it explains.
Evil can we conquer from the body, the heart and the soul.
…………………………….
Really? There are 109 verses in the Qur’an that preach violence. This Da’wa artist hopes we don’t know that.
There is even a Verse that condemns Muslims who *aren’t* violent:
Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, though ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”
Wellington says
Ndong: You will make no headway here at JW because so many of us, like gravenimage, CogitoErgoSum and Angemon, know only too well what Islam intends for all the world and what a mortal enemy of liberty, equality under the law, real women’s rights and a true Golden Rule for all, not to mention fine pork products and good beer, Mo’s decrepit and made-up creed truly is.
Really, every defense of Islam I have ever come across only confirms all the more why I detest it. Your comment most certainly did nothing to dissuade me from this now decades-long conviction. Get lost, loser.
NotALib_NoMo says
I wonder if she’s a good muslima, or is she sporting a clitoris like a common street whore?
Rizzo says
Sharia means islamic law you dont need to say “sharia law”. It makes the article less valuable since it the writer look like they are just pulling buzzwords out of their ass. She clearly doesnt follow the sharia or she wouldnt be speaking in public lol, so why fucking bring it up? The abrahamic religions are trash
John white says
Who td you islam is Abraham religion?
Abraham is Aramaic, hagar is Egyptian how come Ismael become Arab?the whole religion is a fraud
gravenimage says
The implication that Judaism and Christianity prevent women from speaking in public is utterly false.
Goofy says
Ilhan Omar has given us the opportunity to display the essentials of marriage according to Islamic law.
That is important.
It is so important that it is a nuisance that some add their comments, which are completely off-topic.
I hope that they will be removed.
E T says
Well Goofy, off topic Ivan Giaever, Nobel Laureate thinks that between 1860 to 2015 the temperature has in creased from 288k to 288.8 k, the South Pole is colder with more ice and the esrth’s temperature has not gone up in the last 19 years. Scientists are fudging the temperature-they now include the ocean temperatures. There is no rise in sea level?, perhaps that is why Obama’s purchased ocean front property. there is no increase in storms and plants need carbon to grow. Climate change is a sham, distorting computer models for political purposes. I do remember the Professor telling the class in 1987 by 2014 all of Florida would be under water and Canada would have millions more people because of all the 3rd world countries that would be under water. There is one born every minute.
E T says
The Muslim Brotherhood hoods will deal with her when she is no longer needed.
gravenimage says
Not unlikely. She could do a great deal of damage to us until then if we let her, though.
unbeliever1 says
Oh, how I wish someone would draw Omar’s attention to this article. She would be floored by having all these personal details brought out in the open. What a hypocrite!
somehistory says
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/alabama-gop-passes-resolution-calling-for-ilhan-omars-expulsion-from-congress/
“Alabama: GOP Passes Resolution Calling For Ilhan Omar’s Expulsion From Congress”
On the heels of last month’s petition by Minnesota Rep. State Drazkowsky calling on the federal ethics to probe into the “serial career criminal” actions of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), the Alabama GOP passed a resolution that called on the US Congress to expel her.
The resolution was passed by the Alabama Republican Party on Saturday evening.
The resolution was introduced by state Rep. Tommy Hanes (R-Bryant).
Hanes stated, “It’s just simply asking this body to ask the U.S. delegation, the Alabama delegation in Washington, D.C. to start proceedings to unseat Ilhan Omar, congresswoman from Minnesota.”
gravenimage says
Excellent to hear!
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Thank you, Mateen Elass, for this article, but a few points remain unclear. You write,
“2011 — Omar separates from Elmi in a religious ceremony but does not file for legal divorce.
2012 — Within a few months by Islamic ceremony she enters into a remarriage with Hirsi. Their third child, Ilwad, is born June 11, 2012. You can do the math for yourself.”
Sorry, but I cannot do the math for myself. What math do you mean? If the math involves a nine-month pregnancy, don’t we have to know whether something happened before or after September 11(!), 2011? Please, you do the math, and explain its significance.
And Muhammad (pbuh) seems to think that two boys are siblings if they look as alike as two crows do. But to humans, any two crows of the same size look alike. Or does the Prophet have the superpower of being able to tell, from corvine physiognomy, whether two crows are siblings? And if two boys *are* siblings, that still does not establish who their father is.
somehistory says
He wrote that she was still married to the guy said to be her brother…and photos show this to be true…in 2011 and that “no children” came from this marriage; then in June, 2012 after remarrying the first guy early that year, she had her third child.
If “no children’ resulted from her second marriage, the one to her brother, and this kid was born only 6 months into the year she remarried the first guy…the “math” is not clear. Either a child resulted, or she was acting like a wife…or mistress…to her first husband while still married to her brother. That is “adultery” which, supposedly, islam condemns.
Marbran says
And now this:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2019/08/27/woman-claims-ilhan-omar-is-a-homewrecker-in-new-divorce-filing-n2552260
Seems ole Hirsi is a three-time loser with Omar. And she is such the paragon of Islamic virtue!