• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Iranian official: “Shiites must take on the jihad of childbearing to counter the goals of the enemies”

Aug 18, 2019 2:00 pm By Robert Spencer

This idea is not held only by Shi’ites. “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” – Houari Boumedienne, President of Algeria, at the UN in 1974

“‘Childbearing is a type of Jihad’ says Khamenei army representative,” Al Arabiya, August 16, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Childbearing is a type of jihad, said the representative of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the Iranian army on Thursday, adding that “enemies” seek to reduce the population of Muslim countries, the Iranian semi-official Mehr news agency reported.

“Childbearing in the current circumstances is considered a type of jihad and it would please the Almighty God,” said Abbas Mohammad Hassani.

“Enemies of Shiism are trying to prevent the Shiite population from growing, while they continue to increase their own population,” he said, adding that their goal is for Muslims not to have enough “defenders.”

“All Shiites must, therefore, take on the jihad of childbearing to counter the goals and conspiracies of the enemies,” the representative said.

“Countering conspiracies to overthrow the Islamic Republic” is another reason for considering childbearing a type of jihad, according to Hassani. “We need warriors to preserve our existence, identity, and capital.”

Muslim women who have children with the intention of stopping the enemies from reaching their goals will “undoubtedly” receive the reward of jihad for the sake of God, said Hassani.

He also compared childbearing with performing the Hajj pilgrimage and fasting during Ramadan, saying that those are also “difficult religious duties,” but they are completed despite their difficulty….

“You see, in some Western countries, for example in America, a family has 15 to 20 children … they are even encouraged, and no one blames them. But when it is our turn, the opposite is encouraged,” said Khamenei.

“You see, in some Western countries, for example in America, a family has 15 to 20 children”? Maybe in 1785. Not now.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Iran Tagged With: Abbas Mohammad Hassani


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Ole Pederson says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 2:31 pm

    Dear Robert Spencer,

    this quote

    One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.

    – Houari Boumedienne, President of Algeria, at the UN in 1974

    … is found on many places in the Internet, many books have it, and the late, great Oriana Fallaci quoted it in her lovely rants, but I think it is a hoax.

    Here is the original transcript from Boumediene’s [sic] speech in English transcript, directly from the United Nations’ server (see page http://ask.un.org/faq/53773 and look for Chairman Houari Boumedienne)

    I could not find these words in the pdf.

    To make things clear:
    I do not doubt in the least that the above quote correctly describes what many muslims think. But I doubt that Boumedienne ever said it, especially after reading the entire speech (which is of remarkable optimism and typical for the era).

    There is a video from the speech which is in Arabic, can anybody here translate that?

    Search for “ALGERIE Discours de Boumediene à l’ONU”

    Thanks

    • b.a. freeman says

      Aug 18, 2019 at 8:16 pm

      Ole, have U considered that the UN is a den of thieves, hard-core leftists, and devoted haters of the u.s. and israel? perhaps mr. boumediene (sp. according to wikipedia) *did* make the comment, and the thieves and liars failed to record it faithfully. it would’t have been the first time they lied and cheated, especially in the halls of that great cesspool of depravity and theft.

      • Ole Pederson says

        Aug 20, 2019 at 3:37 pm

        Yes, I see the UN as a collection of Islamists and dictatorships.

        The UN of today.

        Then, I am not so sure. Besides, this is not about the UN, but Algerian policy then. The English transcript of the speech both fits into the general atmosphere of the time and to the then politics of Algeria, which was not an Islamic country then. It was Socialist and developmental, and secular, much like Afghanistan before the Taliban.

        True there were Islamists in Algeria (the FIS took over in the 1980s) but it was a much more secular society in the 1960s and 1970s. Do you have any idea about politics in the 1970s ?

        These “womb” quote just does not sound correct for the era, for the country at that time.

        Again: I have no doubt it correctly characterizes muslim thought (if you can call it that) today but I doubt Boumedienne said it.

        Meanwhile I recommend you click the link (pdf) and read the speech yourself, and then judge it a fake or not.

        To me, the womb qoute is a fake UNLESS someone can show reliably, the Arabic original differs from the English translation.

        Again: Is there anybody capable of speaking Arabic?

    • Rufolino says

      Aug 19, 2019 at 7:50 am

      This is a declaration of war !

  2. Ole Pederson says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 2:36 pm

    The direct link should have been THIS.
    O.P.

  3. Peter Buckley says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    No wonder he’s worried. Current birth-rate in Oran is “below replacement” at 1.8%:

    https://www.indexmundi.com/iran/birth_rate.html

    The so-called( non-existent)”demographic timebomb” is also a total myth, often expounded here on JW:

    https://www.today.com/news/muslim-birth-rate-falls-slower-population-growth-wbna41286611

    You can believe the myth about the “demographic timebomb” if you like. As there is zero evidence for it, I personally find it hilarious that many here on JW actually take it seriously……

    • Rev. G says

      Aug 18, 2019 at 4:01 pm

      First, it is not 1.8 percent, it is births per woman. A misleading statistic when polygamy is factored in. According to such statistics, a Muslim man with 4 wives produces 9 progeny, well above the replacement rate. Even a Muslim man with a mere 2 wives would produce over 3 children, again more than the replacement rate.
      Also, care to comment on the muslim birth rate in the west? I didn’t think so.

      • Peter Buckley says

        Aug 18, 2019 at 5:47 pm

        “First, it is not 1.8 percent, it is births per woman…”

        Hilarious. As opposed to “births per man” presumably.

        “The fertility rate is the average number of children born by one woman while being of child-bearing age.”

        https://www.statista.com/statistics/294115/iran-fertility-rate/

        “Births per woman”. Truly hilarious.

        • Mark Swan says

          Aug 19, 2019 at 12:52 am

          We might get a fair guess of projected Muslim population growth,
          if we look into Demographic Study—such as the following.

          This is just one source that might be helpful.

          https://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslim-population/

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 18, 2019 at 10:35 pm

        Rev. G, this might be a factor is Iran were not a Muslim-majority nation, but it is–so the “births per woman” there do in fact generally reflect the birth rates of Muslims.

        • mortimer says

          Aug 19, 2019 at 7:57 am

          A new study by demographers Charles Westoff and Tomas Frejka challenges a common perception that Muslim birthrates are much higher at present and suggests that the fertility gap between Muslims and non-Muslims is shrinking.

          The reality is that with increased scholarization, Muslim girls will chose careers over childbirth. 60% of Saudi university students are now women.

          The Muslim birthrate will continue to drop to the same as European.

        • gravenimage says

          Aug 19, 2019 at 7:01 pm

          Mortimer, my main point was that polygamy only increases Muslim birthrates in an Infidel country–in a Muslim country, it overall makes no difference.

          From what I have read, Muslims *are* out-breeding Infidels, although the numbers do drop somewhat among Muslims in the West.

    • RodSerling says

      Aug 19, 2019 at 11:52 am

      This is a response to Peter Buckley, above. (The “Reply” feature does not seem to be working here for me at the moment).

      As RevG indicated, your use of 1.8%, where 1.8 actually refers to fertility rate (which is not a percentage), and your failure to correct that obvious and basic error, indicates that you need to do more reading and more critical thinking on this topic. I would be very cautious when reading the 2011 NBC Today article you cite, as this issue has been a political football for some time now, with left-leaning parties, publications, media, and research organizations (like Pew) downplaying the Muslim demographic threat, and the “far right” exaggerating it. You call the “time bomb” idea a myth. It’s not clear to me what projected numbers you have in mind (i.e., what percentages, dates, and countries), but your own linked left-leaning source says this regarding population growth rates:

      Globally, the Muslim population is forecast to grow at about twice the rate of the non-Muslim population over the next two decades — an average annual growth rate of 1.5 percent for Muslims, compared with 0.7 percent for non-Muslims,” it said.

      I also suggest you look at more recent projections:
      https://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

      November 29, 2017
      “Europe’s Growing Muslim Population
      Muslims are projected to increase as a share of Europe’s population – even with no future migration”

      (For my part, I think Pew is reasonable, but they have a bias that I think pulls the estimates downward. Even so, their projections are concerning). Muslim birth rates globally on average are still much higher than those of the other major religious groups, and are much higher than those of no religion. The difference is very large in Western countries, especially in Europe and Canada, where Muslims have children at above the replacement level (more than 2 or 2.2 children per woman) and non-Muslim Westerners of the host cultures typically have below-replacement numbers of children (less than 2 or 2.2). There is little sign that non-Muslim women of European background are going to start a large and sustained trend of having more children.

      In many Western countries, people of European background are being replaced at a rapid rate due to low birth rates, mass immigration of non-Europeans, and higher birthrates among new non-European background immigrants, especially Muslims. This is key, because to resist Islamization, one needs to be able to, at minimum, criticize Islam, without being attacked, ostracized, fired, flunked, arrested, etc. But most immigrants of non-European background (though not all–many Hindus and Sikhs are not fond of Islam), overall tend to oppose free expression in this respect; they think those who criticize a religion in public should be limited from or punished for doing so. The population that supports the freedom to criticize Islam is dying off, and is being replaced by populations that are either in favor of Islamization or unwilling to oppose it in real ways. Since Muslims tend to have more children than do people of other religions, and people of no religion tend to have less children than any major religious group, this combination of trends will leave Muslims as the dominant group in several Western countries, first the plurality among the various religious groups, then the majority. It is only a question of how long this will take. By 2060? 2075? 2100?

      Another factor to consider when looking at the overall numbers is age structure. Overall population percentages for the different religious groups aren’t representative of the different age structures in countries’ populations. In Western countries, Muslims tend to be much younger, whereas non-Muslims of European background tend to make up a disproportionately large share of the older age groups, and the older age groups form a disproportionately large share of the overall population (as compared to normal or healthy age structure population pyramids). In the West, Westerners are dying off, and Muslims are arriving or having children at much higher rates. If you look at the school population, Muslims are a much larger percentage there than they are in the general population figures.

      The U.S. probably doesn’t need to worry too much about its overall population in the future (say, within this century) because it is so large and the share of Muslims is so small, but there are pockets where Muslim demographics is a big problem already–e.g., parts of Minnesota and Michigan. Look at all the problems and distraction caused in just a short time by the election of Omar and Tlaib. The U.S. will have to worry about the increasing Muslim populations in certain regions within its borders, and in other Western countries such as NATO partners France, U.K., Germany, Canada, and others. To the extent that these countries remain democratic, they will have to give increasing weight to what their Muslim populations want in all matters, including foreign policy. Indeed, these politicians will increasing be Muslims. The U.S. should be very concerned about a future scenario where Muslim leaders of (previously) Western countries have substantial control of the intelligence organizations and militaries of these countries, especially those with nuclear weapons (U.K., France), or who share with the U.S. the world’s longest undefended border (Canada).

      Islam has expanded for 1400 years. Muhammad’s command to the faithful to have more children than people of other religions in order to outnumber them is quoted in the Hadiths. Christianity is currently the largest religion by population, but Islam will surpass it after 2050, according to Pew. I remember not too long ago people would say the world’s population of Muslims was about 1 or 1.2 billion. Then a few years later they’d say about 1.5 or 1.6 billion. In 2015, Pew said it was 1.8 billion, up from their 1.6 billion estimate in 2010. Historically, the only places where Muslim populations have declined is where drastic measures have been taken to remove them (e.g., Spain, a brutal process that took about 700 years). The process we see taking place around the world, with Muslims tending to increase relative to their non-Muslim counterparts, is unlikely to stop.

      A non-forceful reversal of Islamization in the West would require Muslim women to very quickly, en masse, start acting like secular non-Muslim European-background Western women, and the latter to very quickly start acting en masse like Muslim women, and for this reversal to be sustained for several decades, at least in terms of fertility rates. I don’t believe such a reversal is going to take place in the foreseeable future. A reversal would require Muslims to start emigrating from Western countries at higher rates than they are immigrating, and the opposite for non-Muslim Westerners. Muslims would have to become increasing lax and unobservant, or convert out. A reversal would require Muslims and left-wingers and others to relax about criticism of Islam, and for everyone else to start criticizing it en masse. Since these reversals as general trends are highly unlikely, the Islamization of several Western countries–France, U.K., Germany, Spain, Canada, Sweden, etc.–will continue unopposed. It is only a matter of time when Islam becomes the plurality, and then majority religion in these countries, unless those of us who oppose Islamization take major actions to stop and reverse this trend.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 19, 2019 at 7:02 pm

        Good post.

      • Peter Buckley says

        Aug 19, 2019 at 7:15 pm

        “….France, U.K., Germany, Spain, Canada, Sweden, etc.–will continue unopposed. It is only a matter of time when Islam becomes the plurality, and then majority religion in these countries….”

        Which is the complete opposite of what Pew, the very organisation you quote, says:

        “Muslims will remain relatively small minorities in Europe and the Americas, but they are expected to constitute a growing share of the total population in these regions.”

        https://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslim-population/

        Just how long will this mythical muslim “victory”you fear so much, take? I remember reading similar comments such as yours ten years ago that the UK would be “Islamic” by 2020! Oh dear. Never mind. How about 2030? If you take the recent census figures, which are actually far more accurate than PEW (see below), the fastest-growing “religion”, by MILES is Agnosticism/ Atheism.

        https://humanism.org.uk/2019/04/09/number-of-non-religious-people-in-britain-jumps-by-46-new-figures-show/

        So presumably, you think all these Atheists are at some point going to convert to Islam en masse, or Islam is going to wage successful jihad, even though they are a tiny minority. Sure, Islam is doing really well in Russia and China etc. right?

        Your problem is you are making the same mistake as PEW i.e. you are working on the bizarre assumption that EVERYTHING WILL REMAIN THE SAME i.e immigration rates, birth rates etc. You are working on the bizarre assumption that no political change will occur. We know already that the shutters are going up in many European countries, and even PEW admits that the muslim birth-rates will fall:

        “The growth of the global Muslim population, however, should not obscure another important demographic trend: the rate of growth among Muslims has been slowing in recent decades and is likely to continue to decline over the next 20 years…”

        https://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslim-population/

        According to the last UK census, muslims formed just 4.4% of the total population:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_Kingdom#cite_note-census11-1

        Yet , according to you, we could be muslim majority by 2060. Are you aware of how ridiculous your predictions are? Presumably not. You think the muslim population can go from 5 to 50 % in two generations. That is what you are claiming. I think you need to take a cold shower and stop living your life like a rabbit caught in the headlights.

        In fact, many of your points have already been answered by Mortimer (above), one of the few posters on here who actually seems to have a handle on what is actually happening viz Islam. Here is a summary of the points raised in the study by Westoff and Frejka:

        https://www.prb.org/muslimsineurope/

        In the meantime, I suggest you take a deep breath, calm down, and read some posts by people who aren’t crippled by fear, but actually recognize what is happening within Islam (unlike PEW, who are merely number crunchers):

        https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/08/the-muslims-inner-struggles-part-2#comment-2136413

        Thank you for your time. In 20-30 years time, you’ll look back and wonder why you ever had such thoughts, believe me……………..

        • RodSerling says

          Aug 20, 2019 at 11:53 am

          Peter,

          I think you need to respond to what I actually said. And again, if you don’t know percentages from fertility rates, maybe you need to do some more reading before you opine on this issue with such certainty.

          P: “Which is the complete opposite of what Pew, the very organisation you quote”

          Not at all; and I didn’t say there would be big increases in Muslim population in the Americas; of the latter, only Canada. They project that the Muslim population percentage is going to increase, as the non-Muslim percentage decreases, in several European countries. I only differ from them in suspecting the changes will be larger and happen sooner than that.

          P: “Just how long will this mythical muslim “victory”you fear so much, take?”

          I expect it will be, as it has been thus far, a gradual process in the West, and, like Pew, I expect different outcomes for different countries. Obviously Italy is a different matter due to their recent elections, so I did not mention them, but even there they would have to sustain a policy of reducing Muslim immigration over several election cycles. UK, France, Germany, Sweden, Canada, are all on course to become Muslim majorities. Again, it is only a question of time, if nothing is done to stop and reverse these trends.

          P: “I remember reading similar comments such as yours ten years ago that the UK would be “Islamic” by 2020!”

          That’s a completely dishonest representation. I’ve never claimed that. But you have to admit that the U.K., specifically England, and especially some of the major cities, are pretty “Islamic” already and have been for some years. How much is enough for you to get concerned? Ever heard of Rotherham?

          P: “Oh dear. Never mind. How about 2030? If you take the recent census figures, which are actually far more accurate than PEW (see below), the fastest-growing “religion”, by MILES is Agnosticism/ Atheism.”

          1. Why would you even suggest 2030 re demographics? I didn’t suggest Muslims would be plurality or majority by then. That they will have increased is almost certain, given current trends.

          2. Latest census figures? Those are from 2011. Pew takes census data into account when they make their estimates.

          P: “So presumably, you think all these Atheists are at some point going to convert to Islam en masse, or Islam is going to wage successful jihad, even though they are a tiny minority. Sure, Islam is doing really well in Russia and China etc. right?”

          1. I’m talking about the Western Europe and Canada; you are addressing your own strawmen.

          2. I didn’t say atheists and agnostics will convert en masse to Islam. In the West, the non-religious groups have very few children, pretty much the least of any of the groups we are talking about. The people who have the most children tend to be the fundamentalists in each of the major religions.

          P: “Your problem is you are making the same mistake as PEW i.e. you are working on the bizarre assumption that EVERYTHING WILL REMAIN THE SAME i.e immigration rates, birth rates etc.”

          That’s not quite correct. Pew and others make projections based on current trends (and they add the usual caveats re projections), but there are some changes expected over time. For example, Pew expects the growth rates to slow down.

          P: “You are working on the bizarre assumption that no political change will occur. We know already that the shutters are going up in many European countries, and even PEW admits that the muslim birth-rates will fall:”

          You just said they assume no changes will occur.

          P: “The growth of the global Muslim population, however, should not obscure another important demographic trend: the rate of growth among Muslims has been slowing in recent decades and is likely to continue to decline over the next 20 years…”

          https://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslim-population/

          It’s “slowing” relative to it having been very high before. And the fact remains it is about double the non-Muslim rate, as noted in my previous post.

          P: “According to the last UK census, muslims formed just 4.4% of the total population:”

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_Kingdom#cite_note-census11-1

          2011. Not up to date. You still don’t discuss Muslim versus non-Muslim population age structures.

          P: “Yet , according to you, we could be muslim majority by 2060. Are you aware of how ridiculous your predictions are? Presumably not.”

          Who’s “we”? You haven’t accurately characterized what I said. The only thing I’ve said with a fair amount of certainty is that in several Western countries the Muslim population will continue to increase while the host non-Muslim population will continue to decrease. Every projection that I’ve ever read says this, but most cut off at about 2050, before the bigger changes will become visible in the overall percentages.

          I suggested it’s possible that some Western countries could be Muslim-plurality or -majority within or by the end of this century, and speculated whether that could be 2060, 2075, 2100, by adding a question mark at the end of each of those dates. It will vary depending on the country, the policies, etc.

          P: “You think the muslim population can go from 5 to 50 % in two generations. That is what you are claiming. I think you need to take a cold shower and stop living your life like a rabbit caught in the headlights.”

          I didn’t say that. In some Western countries I think it could occur in the later half of this century, especially in those that have high Muslim immigration relative to host population size.

          P: “In fact, many of your points have already been answered by Mortimer (above), one of the few posters on here who actually seems to have a handle on what is actually happening viz Islam. Here is a summary of the points raised in the study by Westoff and Frejka:
          https://www.prb.org/muslimsineurope/ ”

          1. Morty is a smart guy, an informative commenter, but it appears he has not researched this issue extensively.

          2. That “recent study” is from 2008, and not comprehensive. They confirm that non-Muslim fertility rates in the West are extremely low. Pew’s (2017 update) is comprehensive and recent.

          P: “In the meantime, I suggest you take a deep breath, calm down, and read some posts by people who aren’t crippled by fear, but actually recognize what is happening within Islam (unlike PEW, who are merely number crunchers): https://www.prb.org/muslimsineurope/
          Thank you for your time. In 20-30 years time, you’ll look back and wonder why you ever had such thoughts, believe me……………..”

          If you’re going to tell me to relax, you’d ought to have something better than the prospect of widespread Islamic liberal reform with which to sedate me. Perhaps you have more faith than I do in Muslims reforming their religion within the West, to make it more tolerant, more liberal, less political and less legalistic. Would you like to pin the long-term future of Western civilization on your confidence that Muslims will reform their faith comprehensively and in a short period of time? They are going to do this while they see their numbers increasing and the non-Muslim hosts decreasing? Have you studied Islamic history? The broader trend is that they aren’t moderating overall. Within the West, overall, Islam is more fundamentalist and more political now than it has been in the past several decades. That’s the prevailing trend going forward. As the Saudis and other gulf states continue to propagate fundamentalist interpretations in Western mosques, and support Muslim pressure groups, the situation is getting worse, not better. This is to say nothing of the left-wing media, academics, politicians, and general politically correct portion of the population all enabling Islamization while punishing its opponents.

          A “believe me”? You have to do the necessary research legwork to be helpful to the discussion. It looks like you just grabbed a few links to make some talking points and quick comebacks and have not yet explored the issue, because you already have you mind made up.

  4. elee says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 3:02 pm

    Didn’t they try this once and find that Allah did nothing to feed their surfeit of newborn martyrs? They’ve already dispossessed their few remaining Jews, and I don’t think they’re about to pillage us just yet, not even by redistribution and remittances. When Houari Boumedienne was making his 1974 statement and I was a college student, I was already pointing out that creating starving multitudes was a typically cynical Third World tactic to plunge the world into strife and misery. I didn’t know then that M. Boumedienne had publicly acknowledged my thesis.

  5. FYI says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 3:46 pm

    muslim women should abandon al LAH and find the Actual God.

    And marry an infidel:Jew,Christian…

    al Lah is a misogynistic,chauvinistic, stupid, Arab god who teaches women have only HALF the value of a man in testimony value .k2:282

    {al Lah is a god who gets Astronomy and the Anatomy and Physiology behind human reproductive Biology wrong.I mean,Seriously?}

    muhammed famously said this was because of the “Deficiency of a woman’s mind”,a somewhat ironic (and hilariou)s statement given that it was a Jewish woman{whose husband and family he had killed}who was cunning enough to outsmart him by the use the Poison Test{which he FAILED!}, kill him,expose him as a FALSE PROPHET and CAREER ENDED as islamic trolls love to say about those they{laughably and wrongly} think they have defeated.

    That was a smart woman:she knew she had no future enslaved by the Arabs.

    Poetic Justice too:muhammed,a violently antisemitic MASS-MURDERER OF JEWS{Abu Dawud 4390} defeated by a ……JEWISH woman.

    How YHWH must have laughed…

    marry an infidel,have infidel kids ,bring them up as infidels teaching them to LOVE others{..the Actual God’s 2nd chief commandment:note that al LAH teaches the OPPOSITE..} ..and live happily ever after with your infidel husband.

    welcome to humanity and the 21st century:say goodbye to al Lah,islam and the 7th century.

    Imagine:no need to wear that hijab anymore{it was invented by umar and muhammed anyway}

  6. jayell says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 4:15 pm

    “Shiites must take on the jihad of childbearing to counter the goals of the enemies”……

    Whatever the apparent demographic motivations might be for it, that is an utterly hideous statement. This obnoxious specimen is proclaiming that they should effectively turn their females over to factory farming in order to churn out sufficient bodies as Jihad fodder to advance their proto-nazi global imperialist ambitions. I believe that Adolf Hitler & Co. had a penchant for displaying naked females on carnival floats in order to promote the idea of fertility for the Fatherland, but I don’t think the National Socialists ever stated these aims with quite the bald crudity that we see coming from these muslims. But what else should one expect from disciples of a perverted criminal?

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 18, 2019 at 11:01 pm

      This is how Muslims think of women and children.

  7. Angemon says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 5:50 pm

    You see, in some Western countries, for example in America, a family has 15 to 20 children

    I wonder how many people in Iran actually believe that…

    • b.a. freeman says

      Aug 18, 2019 at 8:24 pm

      his subordinates probably heard about the cable show “19 kids and counting,” Angemon, which has now morphed into a new show following the mostly-now-grown children. yes, a few families are fecund, but “a few” does not a trend make. this boob’s breathtaking lack of knowledge is quite entertaining, and perhaps even hopeful, if it encompasses his (lack of) knowledge of western military capabilities.

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 18, 2019 at 11:11 pm

        Yep. Of course, that family was on television precisely *because* such large families are absolute rarities.

  8. Eric Jones says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 8:20 pm

    The American family norm today is two kids. In the 1950’s there were many families that had three to four kids. The Shiites are just as delusional as the Sunnis.

    Eric

  9. gravenimage says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 10:33 pm

    Iranian official: “Shiites must take on the jihad of childbearing to counter the goals of the enemies”
    ………………

    More Jihad of the womb.

    • Carol the 1st says

      Aug 20, 2019 at 11:30 pm

      Cannon fodder produced by mommies who naturally love Allah best of all!

      • gravenimage says

        Aug 20, 2019 at 11:40 pm

        Grimly true.

  10. CRUSADER says

    Aug 18, 2019 at 11:52 pm

    Luckily, according to some, Islam is in decline, so not to worry.

    And in 12 years we will all be dead from a changed climate.

  11. Scruffy Guru says

    Aug 19, 2019 at 7:05 am

    So if a man has two wives this leaves one with none. A man with three, four etc leaves a concomitant number of men without wives. The only wives they can have are the virgins in heaven. A self validating jihad factory

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 19, 2019 at 7:03 pm

      Spot on. This is also another reason why Muslims abduct, rape, and forcibly “marry” Infidel women.

  12. CTTV15@Hotmail.com says

    Aug 19, 2019 at 10:25 am

    This might explain their existence as a ‘rape culture’.. To them, women are nothing more than ‘breeder’ stock..

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 19, 2019 at 7:04 pm

      Yep.

  13. infidel says

    Aug 19, 2019 at 10:33 am

    Animal Muslims are breeding like there is no tomorrow in India… Ps note that when Jehaadi Pak was formed out of Indian soil in 1947, all the Muslims did not leave for their new homeland. A cancerous 6% stayed back in India and that cancerous 6% has metastasized to almost 20% thru exponential breeding. It is only a matter of time b4 this 20% virulent malignancy explodes to 33% and beyond.. a number after which the Islamization or partition of the infidel land is inevitable.

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 19, 2019 at 7:06 pm

      Grimly true.

      The non-Muslim population of Pakistan has almost disappeared due to Infidels fleeing, being forcibly converted to Islam, and outright murder–whereas, the Muslim population of India has mushroomed.

  14. Carolyne says

    Aug 19, 2019 at 12:39 pm

    Great idea. Let’s see him do it. Actually a Muslim man, if he could do it, is such a coward that he wouldn’t do it.

  15. brane pilot says

    Aug 19, 2019 at 10:40 pm

    FACT: Since 1950, (~70 years) the increase in human population of the earth is TWICE the increase of the previous 100,000 years.
    TWICE.
    Nature will fix this.
    And when She does, you had better hope that you have strong, tall fences; because they are coming by the hundreds of millions to climb them.

    Overbreeding has consequences.

  16. Jon says

    Aug 20, 2019 at 5:57 am

    Ignorance is such a terrible state of being, combine it with stupid arrogance and you have a catastrophe waiting to happen

    • gravenimage says

      Aug 20, 2019 at 4:08 pm

      Grimly, it is already happening.

  17. Truth says

    Aug 20, 2019 at 9:27 am

    The number of Muslims will drop

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • janicevanguilder on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Yogi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Hoi Polloi on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.