My latest in PJ Media:
Australian Justice Peter Johnson knows all about Islam, and isn’t afraid to explain the religion to errant Muslims who misunderstand it with dangerous consequences. According to Australia’s 9 News, Johnson last Friday lectured Bourhan Hraichie, a hardline and unrepentant Islamic jihadist who plotted to kill cops and carved an Islamic State slogan on another prisoner’s forehead, about Hraichie’s religion. Hraichie reportedly “cheered as he was sentenced in the NSW Supreme Court. He interjected at various points, including when Justice Peter Johnson said his beliefs were based on a ‘distorted understanding of Islam.’”
Some might find Justice Peter Johnson, a non-Muslim, to be hubristic. Why should he presume to tell a man who had dedicated his life to understanding Islamic teachings properly and living them out scrupulously that he was getting Islam all wrong, terribly wrong? The oddity of this becomes all the more glaring in light of the fact that Johnson doesn’t know of some Islamic texts or principles that Hraichie is ignoring, but because the implications of the possibility that Hraichie might be applying Islamic texts as their authors intended them to be applied is too terrible for him to contemplate.
This has happened before. Justice Johnson is just the latest in a long line of judges who have lectured Islamic jihadis about how they’re misunderstanding their peaceful, cuddly religion. The only problem here is that jihadis, as The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS shows, for 1,400 years have invoked core Islamic teachings to justify their violence. Peter Johnson, in reality, doesn’t know the first foggiest thing about Islam, but he thinks he does, because many people he trusts and respects have assured him that it’s a Religion of Peace, and he has also been taught that the only people who think otherwise are racist, bigoted “Islamophobes.” Bourhan Hraichie is no racist, bigoted “Islamophobe,” but clearly the poor lamb has been improperly instructed in his religion. If only Peter Johnson had been there in the mosque to teach him the true Islam.
Read the rest here.
Antiislamicman says
Madness
mortimer says
It is madness to MAKE GREAT ASSUMPTIONS if one is a judge. A judge must make decisions based on solid evidence soberly considered and evaluated. Justice Johnson has not evaluated any evidence on the merits of Islam or jihad and thus his conclusion is SPONTANEOUS and WISHFUL THINKING.
Charles Lutz says
Mortimer, just remove that sheep pelt that idiot is wearing over his head and maybe his brain might start functioning better and stop trying to “educate” jihadis.
Paul J says
The Australian judiciary is full of pompous clowns like this Johnson who think they are sooo clever because they went to University for 4 years to learn how to be a parasite on society. He needs a good smack in the head with his gavel.
Michael Copeland says
These judges are unaware that in the future Caliphate they are facilitating they will not be needed.
Michael Copeland says
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/06/the-lamentable-shortcomings-of-some-english-judges-and-senior-lawyers/
Me says
Islam is DANGEROUS!!!
CRUSADER says
Islam is a pieced together FABRICated ideology masquerading as a religion but is only an excuse to cut the world into bite sized pieces.
Jay Smith’s lectures make this notion clear!
“Islam is a River of Blood” — former imam Mark Gabriel
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
FYI says
But..but.. it is the most peaceful relig..{ka ke BOOM}
Joe says
Another deluded legalist who needs to read Koran and come to conclusion that Islam is a political ideaology and not a religion.
Westman says
No jihadist will be convinced of anything by a judge with a carpet on his head, a wig, that turns a man into an image of the feminine. The judge, in ignorance of Islam, does not know that Muslims are instructed to smile for kafirs while inwardly hating them.
CRUSADER says
Very “racist” comment, there, Westman ?
gravenimage says
Westman, this pious Muslim would not listen to this judge not because he is wearing a wig, but because he is an Infidel. By the way, there is nothing feminine about such a wig–the tradition of British judges wearing wigs dates from an era where men wore wigs as commonly–or more so–as did women.
Gail Griffin says
Times change. The wig looks silly.
gravenimage says
If the judges were savvy I would not care what they wear.
James says
It seems to me that the libveral mind, as Dennis Prager says, thinks that people are by nature good. Thus they would not write a book that was evil or recommended doing evil, and people who understood their innate goodness would not take what seems like an evil book to be literally true. Thus the Islamist does not understood the good nature of Islamic doctrines. The good religion of Islam is being misunderstood and not rightly understood, because people are by nature good. If they rightly understood, then they would not do evil or believe that the Islamic writings command evil.
mortimer says
“There are some people that if they don’t know, you can’t tell ’em.”
– Louie Armstrong
Paul J says
Yes, it’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
CogitoErgoSum says
The things a Muslim believes are written in the Quran. Anyone can look up those things. The problem is that not everyone understands abrogation. The rules concerning war and peace with the unbelievers are right there in Surah 9 and those are the final words from Allah on the matter. They override all else that has come before. Right there in Surah 9 all previous treaties with the idolaters (those who are not Muslims) are made null and void. Muslims are to fight those who do not submit to the worship of Allah unless they ask for a treaty that includes humble submission of the Jizya to the Muslims. If the unbelievers do not submit to the rules of such a treaty the Muslims are to consider such people as in rebellion against Allah and are to fight them and slay them wherever they find them. Judge, please tell me how I am wrong about this because I do not want it to be true but it’s right there in the Quran for all to read and Muslims believe it CANNOT ever be changed because it is the eternal and perfect word of Allah. So what can the Muslims do but fight and what can those who are not Muslim do but fight back — or submit. Not a lot of choices there.
CRUSADER says
The “Generous Qur’an” as translated by USAma Dakdok is rather illuminating….
Chrissie says
yep, that’s how it goes.
Breath-taking, delusional self-overestimation while being disastrously uninformed – the hallmark of this clientele…
not only is Islam dangerous. This mindset is, too…
mortimer says
Agree … ‘breath-taking’ delusion ! “Sheikh” Justice Peter Johnson has certainly not spent 10 years studying the voluminous Islamic literature of Koran, Sira, hadiths, tafsirs (canonical commentaries), manuals of Sharia law and Islamic history, and yet, preposterously, he presents himself as a spontaneous authority.
A judge should comment on things that he knows to certain on the basis of having studied THE EVIDENCE. Justice Johnson is certainly not an expert on jihad. Al-Ghazzli is an acknowledged authority.
Imam al-Ghazzali (d. 1111), Islamic intellectual and revivalist of Islam, who is considered the second-greatest Muslim after Prophet Muhammad, wrote this on JIHAD:
“One must go on Jihad at least once a year… One may use a catapult against them when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire on them and/or drown them… One may cut down their trees… One must destroy their useless book [Bible, Torah etc.]. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide…”
mortimer says
correction: that he knows to be certain on the basis of evidence …
CRUSADER says
Qadi (Arabic: قاضي; also Qazi, cadi, kadi or kazi) is the magistrate or judge of a Shariʿa court, who also exercises extrajudicial functions, such as mediation, guardianship over orphans and minors, and supervision and auditing of public works…
Whereas “sheikh” is an honorific title in Arabic for a tribal ruler or leader….
mortimer says
For your information: the honorific of ‘sheikh’ (q.v.) is used in FIVE different ways according to the dictionary. I have used it in its sense of ‘a senior, knowledgeable religious expert’ such as a senior teacher at Al Azhar University or member of the ULEMA (q.v.).
https://www.britannica.com/topic/sheikh
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Non-Muslim Judge Tries to Convince Jihadist That Islam Is a Religion of Peace
This is an example of the charade so many people play for islam:just ignore the jihad violence and the doctrines that cause it and everything will work out just fine.
It makes me lose respect for people in high places when they talk this imprudently in the face of so much death and crime for some barbaric religion. This judge can’t be that uneducated, I gotta believe he knows about the human rights violations in islam and its 1400 year history of violence and murder for doctrines that command violence and murder. No honest man or woman could declare islam to be peaceful with so much daily evidence to the contrary. Islam commands such violence as godly truth in verses that say “fight” or “kill” or “cast terror” or “smite the necks” of the unbelievers and idolaters, Jews and Christians, is it even possible he doesn’t know what the whole world knows? I think it’s sad that so many people make this into some kind of game, they mock the pain and crime of islam with absurd falsehoods that bear little concern for truth or compassion. The lack of moral courage here is insulting and maddening. Judges like this sit on their pompous a$$ and talk down to the rest of us with insincere baby talk that fools no one. Such people should not be in positions of authority, they are making the worst possible decisions when we need them to be truly wise and courageous for the truth. Their cowardly actions are tantamount to complicity, and the end result is more terror, more death, and more loss of freedom. Their collaboration is blatant and with total disregard to the bloody facts. At the very least it’s a moral crime and a dereliction of duty. It reminds me of when Hoover said there was no organized Mafia, how can you fight it if you don’t admit it exists? It’s the same with islam, if the facts are ignored then there is no effective means of battling the jihad muslims are waging in a hundred different ways against us. Islamic doctrines are not peaceful when they cause mass violence and terror like they do, and it’s a crime and a sin to say it is.
mortimer says
I wager that the jihadist Bourhan Hraichie knows much more about jihad than Justice Johnson.
I wager that Justice Peter Johnson does not know that jihad is an ‘ESSENTIAL DOCTRINE’ of Islam, meaning that it is ‘essential for salvation’ for Muslims to believe and practice the doctrine of jihad.
Yes, Your Worship, Muslims who do not practice jihad will go to Islamic hell.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
I wager that the jihadist Bourhan Hraichie knows much more about jihad than Justice Johnson.
That’s most likely true. Or it’s possible “justice” Johnson knows as much but simply doesn’t give a damn about raped kids, honor killings, murderous homophobia, misogyny abuse, FGM, dangerous enclaves, mass murder/terror for allah, and ISIS. Either way justice Johnson is a potential menace when he, as a judge administering justice, publicly declares islam to be peaceful. Judges should be honest with the facts, not lie through their teeth like some political hack looking for votes.
Paul J says
Johnson is more concerned with maintaining his “exalted” position in society than he is in defending truth and justice. He is not the only one either; our judiciary in Australia is full of clowns like him.
Paul J says
The police forces in this country are just as bad too.
WPM says
The devils best trick was to make people believe he did not exist ,Islam greatest trick is to make liberal mind set of judges, elected officials and other in the west to think Islam is like every other major religion or that all religions are good or at least harmless . Without looking at that religion,s basic laws, rules ,how it relates to non-believers ,they rule it must be harmless because all religions in their “opinion” believe in a imagery god of good will to all men. They base their ruling on a great ignorance of the facts, and refuse to go beyond their “personal feelings” that people all are brought up to be basically good. Millions die in Europe because of the general feelings by major world leaders in the west up to Hitler invasion of Poland ,that he was not really that bad of a leader or would do the things he said he would do to the Jews and others who were not part of his master race. Islam has repeatedly in it Holy books , instructed its follows to spread its master religion by violence to eliminate anyone who is not Islamic or Islamic enough thru murder , rape and mayhem.
CRUSADER says
“’The prettiest trick of the devil is to make us believe he doesn’t exist.’”
— movie “The Usual Suspects” quote
gravenimage says
I believe this was first said by Charles Baudelaire.
Spiro says
Stupid is as stupid does
freedom says
Is that shrimp that I smell ?
CRUSADER says
Box o’ Choc-o-lates !
Emilie Green says
It’s like a bad Monty Python sketch:
MUSLIM TERRORIST: “We did this because our Islamic holy texts exhort us to do it.”
WESTERN LEADERS: “No, you didn’t.”
MUSLIM TERRORIST: “Wait, what…yes, we did.”
WESTERN LEADERS: “No, this has nothing to do with the Muslim religion. You guys are just using religion as a front for social and geopolitical reasons.”
MUSLIM TERRORIST: “WHAT? Did you even read our official statement? We provide explicit Quranic justification and documentation. This IS jihad: a holy crusade against pagans, blasphemers, and disbelievers.”
WESTERN LEADERS: “No, this is definitely NOT a Muslim thing. You guys are not true Muslims, and you defame a great religion by saying so.”
MUSLIM TERRORIST: “HUH? Who are you to tell us we’re not true Muslims? Islam is literally at the core of everything we do, and we have implemented the truest, most literal and honest interpretation of its founding texts. It is our very reason for being.”
WESTERN LEADERS: Nope, we created you. It’s our fault. We installed a social and economic system that alienates and disenfranchises you, and that’s why you did this. We are sorry.”
MUSLIM TERRORIST: “What? Why are you apologizing? We just murdered your citizens mercilessly in the streets. We targeted unwitting civilians – ‘disenfranchisement’ doesn’t even enter into it.”
WESTERN LEADERS: “Listen it’s our fault. We don’t blame you for feeling unwelcome and lashing out.”
MUSLIM TERRORIST: Seriously, stop taking credit for this. We worked really hard to pull this off, and we’re not going to let you take it away from us.”
WESTERN LEADERS: “No way. We nourished your extremism and therefore we must accept full blame.
MUSLIM TERRORIST: SHEESH…ALLAH ABOVE! How many more of your people do we have to slaughter around here to finally get our message across that we are doing this in the name of Islam?”
from,
https://barenakedislam.com/2016/03/23/how-many-more-innocent-civilians-do-muslim-terrorists-have-to-kill-before-the-west-stops-blaming-itself/
Diane Harvey says
Anthony the Great, d.351AD, “A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.'”
CRUSADER says
Kurt Vonnegut —
‘A sane person to an insane society must appear insane.’
mortimer says
Thanks, Emilie, very amusing.
CRUSADER says
Well, the West has more and more turned its back on realities!
Ever since giving up Christ at the center of Christendom! + + +
It’s gotten to the point that Crusades are looked upon as failure.
—————————
It must be incredibly frustrating as an Islamic terrorist not to have your views and motives taken seriously by the societies you terrorize, even after you have explicitly and repeatedly stated them.
Islam was never a religion of peace. Islam is the religion of FIGHTING. No one should believe that the war we are waging is the war of the Islamic State. It is the war of all Muslims; but the Islamic State is just spearheading it. It is the war of Muslims against infidels.
— Abu Bakr (model unit # 2015)*
* ISIS Leader : al-Baghdadi, PhD
tim gallagher says
I’m glad you put that dialogue up on Jihad Watch again, Emilie. I remember that you put it up on Jihad Watch a little while ago when this same Judge Johnson was being discussed. I think it is brilliant and skewers the mindset of these idiotic, ignorant leftie judicial officials and many of our western politicians and media fools. They do seem to live in a state of wish fulfilling fantasy and can’t face the harsh truth. Whoever wrote it did a brilliant job of satirising these fools. I suspect this judge is a left leaning, politically correct person, probably appointed by his fellow leftie judicial types. Then again, I can’t remember any of our judges out here in Australia who have had real honest, tough things to say about Islam. I suppose most of them do know about quite a few things, but, when it comes to Islam, they usually seem to know very little. Of course, to be honest and tell the truth about Islam, (if they did actually know the truth about islam) makes people a target, so maybe they know how to play it safe and lie about Islam’s nature.
Paul J says
They care more about their positions (and protecting their perverted colleagues- Peter Liddy was/is NOT the only rock spider on the bench) than justice or truth.
tim gallagher says
I’m sure you’re right, Paul J. But the comment just below this by No Muzzies Here is spot on, when he says that the Judge is thinking and saying “the approved thoughts”. There are a lot of left leaning judges and magistrates around and they all seem to get around spouting the clichés about how Islam is not really violent. But also, it does take some guts to speak up and tell the truth about Islam because there’s a pretty good chance they will come after people such as politicians or judicial or media types who tell the truth. Even if he knows how evil Islam is, he probably lacks the courage to tell the truth. Judges sometimes do seem to make statements about things they know nothing about. I believe that all the people who comment here at Jihad Watch would know far more about islam than this judge does, because they have actually bothered to learn about Islam.
Michael Copeland says
No part of a judge’s training includes Islam, that is, Sharia law.
This is a glaring omission that needs to be remedied.
tim gallagher says
That’s true, Michael. But since most of the authorities, whether politicians, judicial authorities or media types ( at least here in Australia, but, I think, in most western countries) won’t admit that there is any great problem with Islam, I’m pretty sure that educating our judicial officials about Shariah law won’t be happening soon. They are still living in denial about the problems with Islam. We can only hope that they wake up reasonably soon.
gravenimage says
These days if British law schools taught Shari’ah law they would probably be advocating it. This would make things worse.
tim gallagher says
I suspect you’re right, gravenimage. The UK does seem to be pretty far gone when it comes to dealing with Islam from what I read, mostly here at Jihad Watch. They seem to have gone further down the road to surrender to Islam than Australia has done so far, and I suspect it is because they have let far more Muslims into their country. I keep hoping that Australia, seeing the far worse problems that the UK and other western European countries are dealing with, will wake up and avoid the problem that Muslims bring into our country by ending Muslim migration or, at least, severely limiting it..
No Muzzies Here says
The judge is thinking the approved thoughts. The Muslim is thinking the truth. The judge knows he will be criticized if he says that Islam promotes violence and killing of non-Muslims. The Muslim knows that to be true, and will receive praise for thinking that way.
mortimer says
Agree.
Justice Johnson is merely repeating comforting, preconceived thoughts not his own, and without studiously investigating whether they HOLD WATER.
Johnson’s preconceived, comforting idea that Islam is benign and peaceful doesn’t HOLD WATER, because it is disavowed by Muslim scholars and jurists of great authority, by Islam’s primary texts and by Islamic history, not to mention by ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE.
Simply put, Justice Peter Johnson has pronounced SPONTANEOUSLY (no doubt with good intentions) without having DONE HIS HOMEWORK on the subject of whether JIHAD is authentic, approved Islamic teaching. Jihad is authentic teaching.
‘Political Islam’ is in fact the teaching that Muslims should have POLITICAL CONTROL over all non-Muslims. This control is gained, implemented and enforced by JIHAD (struggle against non-Muslims).
Peter Johnson appears to be unaware of Islam’s authentic supremacism and of jihad (the means of imposing Islamic supremacism).
CRUSADER says
mortimer, your assessment of someone and judgment about them — in this case, Justice Johnson — on this thread, is well placed; and I do appreciate that.
✌️
yours, CRUSADER
Paul J says
He is fully aware of Islamic doctrine don’t you worry about that. He just cares more about his precious position in society than telling the truth.
gravenimage says
Oh, I doubt it. He is likely in denial as so many fools are.
Angemon says
I hope thhe man studied law better than he studied islam…
Diane Harvey says
Don’t count on it. You know the old phrase, “Wrong in one, wrong in many.”
CRUSADER says
Yes, indeed.
Samurai would study people in public settings and discern their overall character of worth …. depending on how they (the people being observed) carried themselves through an event or statement or incident, as a snapshot of how one’s integrity and learning (or lack thereof) comes forth —
— or doesn’t !!
Worthwhile reading sometime:
“LIVING THE MARTIAL WAY”
by Major USAF Forrest Morgan (1992)
Wellington says
Even highly intelligent and well educated people block out of their mind that a religion can be evil. Similarly, as many attorneys know, the ordinary person can deal with terrible things like murder, rape of an adult, assault and battery, burglary, etc., but have a very difficult time fathoming how anyone can sexually abuse a child.
There are some things so beyond the Pale, such as child molestation and a major religion being iniquitous, that most regular folks simply exclude such “events” out of their mind. It’s actually very human to do so but some things that are very human to do are nonetheless unwise and rooted in significant error. Thinking a major religion must be good serves as a fine example here.
Oh, there is no excuse by now for any intelligent adult to whitewash the Islamic faith of its many heinous dictates (e.g., death for apostasy), but I am not addressing here the being out of excuses on the matter of Islam but rather a fundamental aspect of human psychology.
CRUSADER says
If it is a really divine and spiritually based religion, as in ritual of worship for humans to follow through with, it wouldn’t contain evil, for God is love….
We humans (influenced by sin and demons) are to blame for distortions which emanate this sense of evil.
Humans are vulnerable to evil, and yet susceptible to love.
Sin = “missing the mark” (archery term — we all miss at some level.)
Grace = saves;
And ….all we need to do is accept that Gift to know true blessing!
CRUSADER says
Which is why Islam isn’t a real religion… but an ideology of false design and human ego !
Basically it is a manual for those who are timid and wish to submit to debasement and gluttons for punishment, or a treasure map for vainglory hounds who seek pleasure and booty and short term strategies for life… leading to dead ends.
Despite being framed as a “religion”, Islam is despicable!
Michael Copeland says
“Islam is not like Christianity. Our Islam is political.”
Mullah Krekar
James Lincoln says
The biggest problem that I see with Australian Justice Peter Johnson is the fact that he doesn’t know that he doesn’t know.
If he took the time, looked at all the facts about Islam, used clear thinking evidence-based logic, he would undoubtedly come to a different conclusion – unless he is delusional.
CRUSADER says
Yes!
The old “doesn’t know that he doesn’t know” trick!
— Maxwell Smart
TKF says
Judge: “Why did you kill all those people and wage violent Jihad?”
Jihadi: “I was simply following the instructions of my holy books and the example of the Prophet Mohammad, who got everything straight from God. These teachings are perfect and unalterable for all time”
Judge: “No, we don’t believe you, why did you REALLY do it?”
Jihadi: “I just told you.”
Judge: “Because of the book?”
Jihadi:”Yes, yes, yes, yes, how many times do I have to tell you morons…it’s all in the book. If you would pull your heads out of your collective asses and read it……and then imagine someone like me taking every single word…,LITERALLY. That’s the key word for you…LITERALLY. We take the teachings in the book LITERALLY. If it says kill infidels and impose Islam on the non-believers, we don’t think it means…Hug it out with the infidels and listen to their side with respect and an open mind. It means exactly what it says it says…..KILL AND ENSLAVE THEM. Am I getting through to you?”
Judge: Yes, of course….but why did you do it?”
And so on, and on, and on, and……
I for one take the Jihadis at their word. These guys were served Islam at every meal from the moment they were born, and know it a hell of a lot better than I ever will. Who am I to tell them how to define their faith? Muslims define Islam by their words, their deeds and by the extent to which they take their dogma literally…and let’s face it, a whole shitload of them do.
CRUSADER says
“Disbelief is catching. It rubs off on people.”
— Ray Bradbury
“A Miracle of Rare Device”, in Playboy (January 1962)
Peter WF says
Judge is an idiot. What has he been reading? Certainly not “Broken and Betrayed” by Jayne Senior.
sheliak says
Johnson epitomizes those elites educated into imbecility that are destroying the West.
Michael Copeland says
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/06/the-lamentable-shortcomings-of-some-english-judges-and-senior-lawyers/
UNCLE VLADDI says
All lawyers are literally professional hypocrites – it’s practically their job description. They have to be ready willing and able to substitute feelings for facts, just to “win” at any and all cost to objective truth, logic, rationality and justice.
So (as all judges used to be lawyers) why would anyone ever presume that lawyers are qualified to be judges at all, much less the best choice for the job?!
Judges love ignoring facts in order to commit “Legal” fraud – it’s almost one of their main job description requirements.
All “judges” are deliberately dense these days. They deliberately obscure things in the hopes of being better able to pretend to misunderstand them. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and being given the authority to always have only rights and no responsibilities, while everyone else has no right to defend them selves from them, but only the “legal” responsibility to become and remain their slaves, doesn’t exactly motivate them to become more diligent in their daily professional lives – quite the opposite, in fact: it only encourages their habitual delinquency and sense of entitlement to do less and less in each and every case.
They go against the law by embracing and endorsing the false defense of “hurt feelings” and put opinions above facts and logic – as all hypocrites always do (they must embrace emotions because facts will never justify their double standards). Common criminal hypocrites (and all criminals are hypocrites, just as all hypocrites are criminals) also commonly obscure their criminal intentions by hiding and deflecting (and defending!) their criminal choices behind the common screen of the “diseased victim” model of humanity endorsed by their high priests (aka psychiatrists) – as literally thought-killing “psycho-paths” (which is simply the Greek words for “thought-killers”)! But hypocrisy is still a choice, and as it is mental treason to all rationality and civilization, it’s a criminal one.
Libertine “liberal” judges are delinquent and indeed criminally negligent towards their responsibilities to actually bother to read the facts of any given case – they will often defer their own “judgment” (which is the only thing we employ them to exercise!) to “expert opinions” no matter how illogical or insane, just because said “experts” have been registered as same!
gravenimage says
Not all lawyers are like this–too many are, though.
fredoniahead says
Open-minded sages like this “judge” is what Cultural Marxism produces. Denial, Deceit, Delusion.
We can be assured if Christianity were under the same light he would not be defending it as peaceful, but how horrible, superstitious, and oppressive it is. Yet another Western “judge” programmed in the Humanist Darwinist Western universities. Defend Islam, but excoriate your own traditions and heritage in lieu of lukewarm PC BS.
jca reid says
Idiot Judge! Should read the Koran for himself & learn the facts. Ought to retire & concentrate on his S&M Parties with the Rent Boys the Judiciary as ssssoooooo fond of!