Where exactly are Muslims actually suffering deprivation of their human rights? That is, real ones, not the fabrications of “Palestinian” victimhood propaganda.
Anyway, if Imran Khan thinks “Islamic terrorism” is just an invention designed to justify or enable the oppression of Muslims, he is free to stop taking American taxpayer money in exchange for pretending to fight against it.
“Magic phrase of Islamic terrorism is coined to oppress Muslims, says Pakistani PM Imran Khan,” Azertac, September 25, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
“World has a problem when it comes to human rights of Muslims. To oppressed [sic] Muslims and to get rid of their human rights, all you need to utter the magic phrase of “Islamic terrorism” and no one cares about their (Muslims) human rights”.
This was stated by Prime Minister of Pakistan as opening statement at the dinner hosted in honor of Heads of Delegation of OIC Contact Group on Jammu & Kashmir at New York on the sidelines of 74th UNGA Session….
Westman says
If Muslims are slaves of Allah as they claim, then do slaves have rights? Or, are the actual rights, allowed by Allah, bounded within exercising control and manipulation of unbelievers?
mortimer says
Manipulation? It sure is. Let’s just apply the shoe-on-the-other-foot test!
So … “In Pakistan, “To oppress non-Muslims, utter the magic phrase ‘DIRTY KUFAAR’ and no one cares about their human rights”.
jarmanray says
+++++++++++++1 Good points and by the way, Kahn has sold his country to the only bidder, China via the Silk Road.
JW_Reader says
This guy Imran Khan is worse than Zia-Ul-Haq. Haq is considered the father of Terroristan. Not that Pakistan was a peace loving country before him – but Haq made it much worse. He purged all secular people from positions of power. He oversaw the growth of Mujahedins. He really nurtured the idea of Pakistan being the land of pure Islam. Imran Khan is just following his footstep. It is really kinda sad given that Imran Khan is Oxford educated and should know better.
Martin Land says
The only things Jinnah took with him leaving Oxford were a facility in sophism, and the tens of thousands of pounds that he neglected to pay his bar bills with.
Khan would not be the first Pakistani to emulate him
Naildriver says
As with his pretzel thinking and veiled threats to the West, before the UN assembly the other day, he suggested to insult Mohammed or Islam is to provoke, in a ‘ criminal way, a Muslim to violence, and that since it’s such a common response it shows the fault is in those who insult and should not be considered Islamic terrorism– since, he rationalized, that There is no terrorism from Islam — just righteous self defense.
Pakistan is a serious enemy with or without this guy running things there — a first strike upon their nuclear forces will eventually be a serious option. Muslims with atom bombs is just an intolerable state of affairs.
gravenimage says
Repulsive–but no surprise.
tim gallagher says
Muslims are full of so much garbage. Islam has a rotten attitude towards non-Muslims, and non-Muslims in crappy, barbaric Muslim countries have pretty much no human rights, but these hypocritical Muslim spokesmen, whether Imran Khan or any of the others, whinge and whine about how MUslim human rights are trampled on. Of course, they know that, in western, civilised countries, which actually do care about human rights, they will, unfortunately, be able to fool many people with their whining rubbish. Muslims have to heal themselves, get some actual human rights in their own stinking countries, which is something they’ll never do. As for Khan’s crap about the magic phrase “Islamic terrorism”, well what the hell does he expect. It’s a f*cking reality. 35,684 deadly terrorist attacks( as recorded here on Jihad watch today) since the 9/11 attack. And disgusting, inhuman Muslim creeps like Khan think that we should just accept this and think that it’s OK. The way I see it, it is such a massive scam that Muslims run where they give no human rights to non-Muslim but expect we should give a damn about Muslim human rights.
Christina Pansy says
You are right, thank you.
tim gallagher says
Thanks for your comment, Christina. I get very angry about the Muslims, who give no human rights to non-Muslims, whingeing about how their precious human rights are being disrespected. And I’m sure that they see the civilised people in western countries as a soft touch, which a lot of them are. Many people in the western countries will fall for the type of BS that Khan is uttering and think that they had better be more considerate of Muslims. I think the upbringing that Muslims have, where they learn to have a rotten attitude towards non-Muslims, probably makes them think that non-Muslims are a really low form of human life and don’t deserve to have human rights. I guess I think, well, Muslims, right back you
James says
The strange thing about Muslims complaining of the loss of their rights. Under sharia they have far fewer rights than in the USA. Yet they want to impose sharia on America. What rights do they think they have that are being taken away? Is it the right to go through the security checks at airports without being examined? Is it the right to practice honor killing or have halal food at school or practice Islamic prayers in businesses? Who gave them such rights? I think what they really mean is they want the right to take other peoples’s rights away.
gravenimage says
But Muslims here don’t have the “right” to oppress and rape Infidels–which is what Khan means.
Herb L says
There is your true White Supremacy. Muhammad was a White man by their own admission in the Quran, and now the Muslims believe that a self proclaimed prophet is the last prophet of god when they trash Jesus, they admit that their god has no power over Jesus. Jesus came back from death, Muhammad is dead by the hand of a Jew woman. Where was their Allah’s protection of the last prophet of Islam when he was killed by two enemies of Islam, Jews and a woman? There was, is, and no Allah except in Satan’s bag of tricks.
Terry Gain says
Refusal to acknowledge the superiority of Muslims and Islam must be a denial of Muslims rights.
gravenimage says
+1
Norger says
In his book “Catastrophic Failure,” Stephen Coughlin goes through an excellent analysis of authoritative Islamic sources to establish that the refusal to submit to Islam constitutes aggression against Islam. You are right, that is precisely the mindset.
gravenimage says
Exactly.
gravenimage says
+1
gravenimage says
Pakistan PM: “To oppress Muslims, utter magic phrase ‘Islamic terrorism’ and no one cares about their human rights”
……………………….
In Islam, Muslims have the “right” to wage terrorism–and objecting to this ‘takes away their rights’.
Relic says
utter magic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI8nOCKgjhg
mortimer says
ISLAM DEMONIZE THE KAFIRS SO THAT MUSLIMS MAY REMOVE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES.
PROJECTION: PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION is the technique of defending oneself against the accusation of having unpleasant, immature or neurotic impulses by denying their existence in oneself, while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is rude may accuse other people of being rude.
Imran Khan is reversing what Muslims do … they demonize the kafir so Muslims will not feel normal human sympathy about oppressing them.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
“Pakistani Prime Minister at U.N.: Radical Islam Doesn’t Exist; India Behaving Like Nazi Germany”
https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2019/09/27/pakistani-prime-minister-at-u-n-radical-islam-doesnt-exist-india-behaving-like-nazi-germany/
gravenimage says
Projection.
Chand says
Pakistan has been pushing jihadis into Indian Kashmir as part of its regional strategy. China looks the other way. The Jihadis blew up eighty soldiers in a car bomb attack some months ago. India , in response, attacked a jihadi camp inside Pakistan from the air. Now India, two months ago, has taken away Kashmir’s autonomy status and has put the state under a security lock down. There is no internet, meagre phone lines and travel restrictions. Patients are unable to access proper medical care and life-saving drugs are dwindling and hospitals are not functioning properly due to the net being down. Most local politicians are detained, even the moderates. So the Kashmiri locals are being collectively punished for the jihadi’s acts.
All this is not dampening the popular insurgency and secessionism though. In fact, it is probably increasing with rising local anger.
Who knows what will happen when the clampdown is lifted there. More anti-India uprisings?
And the neighbors are nuclear armed.
gravenimage says
“Popular insurgency”–in other words, Jihad terrorism.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Well, as no muslim anywhere has ever yet admitted, human rights must come with human responsibilities. Islam is always all about the double standards. Islam is the religion of criminal hypocrisy – and so, unlike Christianity, (which Western libertine “liberal” criminals hate because it says they have free-will choices and responsibilities) islam says they are really only helpless slaves of unknowably unknown, almighty allah – and that if they feel like committing a crime and get away with it, then since allah let them, it means he wanted them to, and so not only was it never really a crime in the first place, but it also means that allah himself used them to commit the “crime” as an act of punitive justice against his real enemies (their victims). In short, islam sanctifies what the liberals wanted to do anyway, and provides them with a perfect, holy alibi to excuse their own criminal desires and actions. and with group or gang rights come group or gang responsibilities, too; so if and when your gang says it’s so superior to everyone else that its members have not only a right but also an obligation to their god to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-members of your gang, then you’re all irresponsible criminals, and one’s general membership in such a gang is all the evidence we need to convict one of the gang’s crimes, even if one committed no other specific crimes one’s self, because one’s memberhsip re-presents the inherent death-threat the gang itself so proudly presents. In short: YES, all muslims are murderous terrorist gangsters and should always be treated as such. But Imran Khan already knew that!
Nic says
Very intellectual response, although,.. no offense – you’re way to much smarter than the average bear 20 second sound bytes are very effective. Radical Muslims are all about deception and will slit your throat in a heartbeat.
jayell says
“To oppress Muslims, utter magic phrase ‘Islamic terrorism’ and no one cares about their human rights”….
Well, if (1) muslims weren’t transparently responsible for over 90% of terrorism globally, (2) didn’t then openly brag about it and (3) didn’t have total disrespect for other people’s rights written into their ‘creed’, then no-one would be talking about ‘islamic terrorism, would they? And it’s interesting to see how they project their own penchant for ‘oppression’ onto others just because other people have the nerve to tell them a few home-truths about themselves – and then project their own bigoted stupidity onto others by assuming we’re all going to fall for their predictable cry-baby tactics.
Joe says
Under Imran Khan’s rule, Pakistanis who are not Muslim have no human rights. Anyone can accuse non-Muslims of blasphemy, immorality, or whatever and make it stick. Ask Asia Bibi about the rights of non-Muslims in Pakistan.
Infidel says
Not just that, god help you if you’re a non-Muslim parent of a girl, no matter what her age. Your teenage daughter may have gone to school one day, and hours later, you find out that she’s now ‘married’ to some Mohammedan somewhere and converted to Islam, and there’s nothing you can do about it.
Some Uighur in China rounded up and suspected of terrorism is more likely to go free and come home than such a girl in Pakistan
RP says
Imran Khan should look at his backyard ,before he opens his verbal diaraioua daladilriao. In 1950s Hindus in Pakistan were 20% , Today less then 1% , what happen to Hindus. they were killed off or were force converted.He should check is minority population too.
gravenimage says
Yes–there are few Hindus, Christians, and Sikhs surviving in Pakistan today.
infidel says
Yeah yeah yeah… and we all know how U are the greatest victims in the history of the globe… poor thing..
Tom says
“When Muslims are in the minority they are all about human rights. When Muslims are the majority, there are no human rights”
gravenimage says
Spot on, Tom. Muslims will use our laws–or pretend to–until they can destroy them and replace them with Shari’ah barbarism.
toomanyhobbies says
Opinion; Terrorist have no rights, human or otherwise.
SAFI says
Mr Khan went on to say
“To shut up troublesome infidels, utter magic phrase “far-right islamophobe” and no one cares about their Freedom of Speech”… That’s how you do it in the kufar lands. In Pakistan you just accuse them of blasphemy.
Madeline Mardigan says
The inbreeding is strong in this one