The critically important reason why her pleas fell on deaf ears. My latest in FrontPage:
Here in the United States and in other non-Muslim countries, we love Islam. We are proud of our love for Islam, because it shows the world that we are not racists, we are not bigots, we are not “Islamophobes.” Oh, no. We are enlightened. We are generous. We are open-minded. We welcome refugees. We know Islam is a religion of peace, and are happy to have large numbers of Muslim migrants join our glorious multicultural mosaic. In fact, we love Islam so much that we love it even more than many Muslims themselves do.
A case in point comes from a disturbing incident that the HinduPost reported recently: three Muslims abducted and gang-raped a 16-year-old Hindu girl, and even shot a video of the rapes. When it was all over, they threatened to kill her. HinduPost notes that “the girl can be seen pleading with the men in the extremely disturbing video. She is heard calling them ‘bhaiya’ (brother) and saying, ‘Please leave me for your Allah’s sake.’ But her pleas had no effect on her rapists,” who were identified as Mohammed Chotka, Mohammed Badka and Mohammed Nazim.
“Please leave me for your Allah’s sake.” Why didn’t this plaintive cry move the hearts of Mohammed Chotka, Mohammed Badka and Mohammed Nazim? Why didn’t they recall what non-Muslim political (Barack Obama, John Kerry) and religious (Pope Francis, the Dalai Lama) leaders constantly remind us: that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance that upholds human rights and the equality of rights of all people? Why didn’t Mohammed Chotka, Mohammed Badka and Mohammed Nazim remember that Islam teaches respect and regard for women, including infidel women? Why did they instead keep on abusing this poor girl, ignoring her invocation of their noble, tolerant, peaceful, equitable religion?
One reason could be that Islam is not actually what these confident non-Muslim experts believe it to be, and that many Muslims are aware of this. The behavior in this case of Mohammed Chotka, Mohammed Badka, and Mohammed Nazim has solid Qur’anic sanction, and at least some Muslim rapists know this: one survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote the Qur’an to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
Another case in point came in Germany last week, when a Muslim migrant received a ten-year sentence for six attempted murders of judges and prosecutors (yes, you read that right, about 21 months for each murder). He also wanted to behead another migrant because he “insulted his religious feelings.”
Haider spat toward the judge and screamed: “To hell with you and those who created you.” He wrote to judges who were on his case: “I promise, if I get a pig from your worshipers of the cross in the hands, I will drink his blood. I’ll spit at you and your cross.”
In response, Judge Sandra Mayer said: “It’s amazing how a young man can be so caught up in hate, anger and blind rage….Haidar A. is caught in almost medieval ways of thinking and the court has little hope that he will develop for the better.”
His ways of thinking aren’t “almost medieval,” they’re Islamic, based on the Qur’an’s repeated exhortations to “kill them wherever you find them” (2:191, 4:89, cf. 9:5) and to wage war against and subjugate Christians and other People of the Book under the hegemony of Islamic law (9:29). But Mayer and the rest of the German establishment cannot and will not admit that; to do so would be “Islamophobic,” and would cast all of Merkel’s migrant enterprise into question.
All over the world, non-Muslim, including those who are in positions of power, continue to assume that if Muslims would only adhere to the true teachings of Islam, then there would be peace and harmony between Muslim and non-Muslim communities, and behavior such as what is described in this story would disappear.
Unfortunately, that is an unrealistic assumption. The sooner non-Muslim leaders recognize that and begin to formulate realistic ways to deal with it, the better off we will all be. But that recognition isn’t even on the horizon.
Ajay says
U show ur generous heart, they will creep and crawl. They wil live so nicely with u in perfect harmony that u will be shocked. Then, when they grow in numbers, they will destroy ur beliefs, terrorize u, rape ur womenfolk and all this in the name of religion. And then u will think Ooh Lord why did I in the first place did not Check them, nip the bud while there was time. Repent now, o fools.
Infidel says
At many Trump rallies in 2016, he’d read out a poem called ‘The Snake’ by Al Wilson, which ran like this:
Every time I saw the president read out that poem, the only thing that struck my mind was Muslims. Not MS-13, not Salvadoreans, not Hondurans – many of the latter 2 categories being legally here. But Muslims. Who in Europe have been behaving like the snake in this poem, while their host countries – Germany, Sweden, UK, Netherlands, et al have been like the woman in this story
gravenimage says
Yes–this is the nature of all devout Muslims.
J D S says
What group of people in the whole world are causing the most problems??? MUSLIMS!!!!!
I sure would hate to be among the most hated peoples in the world…..but, but, but…Jesus said to love not hate…Hmmmmm!..so this seems to prove that the most hated peoples in the world are worshiping the wrong god, their Allah.
J D S says
Oh by the way..Just heard on the news that the fastest growing church is in …where??? Not in the U.S but actually in…….IRAN. . Sheep among Wolves.
mortimer says
The Red-Green Axis of Evil is even controlling the narrative about Islam in India? Hindus should understand Islam better than anyone after the genocide of more than 80 million Hindus by Muslims. But, sadly, many Hindus are no more informed about Islam than the Western Leftards who believe in their own infallibility.
And how about the idea that Islam is against rape? It is against rape, but only if a Muslim is the victim.
The kafir’s life, ‘blood’, honor and property are MUBAA (licit) … i.e. ‘licit’ to the Muslim for plundering. They are not ‘sacred’ to a Muslim. They are “MUBAA” (licit) whenever a Muslim is displeased with anything a kafir does or says.
Mohammed said that only the lives of practicing Muslims are sacred to him … dirty kafirs may be robbed, slandered, enslaved, humiliated, murdered and raped:
Hindus need to start reading the authentic doctrines and teachings of the CONSENSUS of Islam, rather than making up a fake ‘NARRATIVE’ about a non-existent benign fantasy version of Islam.
RegT says
Mortimer, rape is barely an offense in islam. Women are always believed to be at fault, and even today, in Saudi Arabia especially, the woman is charged with “witchcraft” – yes, actual witchcraft – for “seducing” the man (or frequently, _men_) and causing her own rape/gang-rape:
“The prophet says: A woman is 90% at fault for her own rape. She and she alone carries the sin of corruption, and the foul instrument of sin and defilement in her own body. In islam, only the man is allowed sexual desire or fulfillment. A woman serves allah by serving men.”
By the way, a woman’s vagina is considered more foul, due to her monthly bleeding, than the rectum of a man, since having anal sex with another man is permissible in islam (homosexuality includes romantic feelings between partners. It is this, not the sex act itself, which is considered haram by muslims. (Afghani troops barracking on the same base as American troops have been commonly observed having sex with each other, and our troops have been ordered not to pay attention or interfere in any way – even when very young boys are being raped, instead of the Afghani soldier doing it with his fellow soldiers.)
Lydia Church says
Calling those who hate islam ‘islamophobes’
is as irrational and stupid as calling those who
hate nazi’s; ‘naziophobes’!
We hate evil and things that threaten civilized society.
To those who use the term ‘islamophobes’:
Please learn the lesson and ‘get it’!
RegT says
Lydia, “islamophobe” is wrong for another reason – those of us who detest islam do not fear islam. We detest it. The correct suffix is “-misia”, the Greek suffix meaning “disgust for; revulsion of; contempt for; abhorrence of”. Yes, that includes “hate, hatred for”, but the Left will simply spin that as all of us being “haters”, instead of those of us who are islamomisians _abhorring_ this death cult, rape cult, sexual perversion cult (male on male sex, approved animal sex, child rape and infant sodomizing).
If the following was the only thing wrong with islam (not even close, by an order of magnitude), it would still be worth eradicating this cult: the ayatollah khomeini, the former supreme religious leader in Iran, wrote a book titled, “Tahrirolvasyleh” – Rules of Conduct, back in 1990 (_not_ 1690, but 1990). Within its pages is this quote:
“A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable.” The book is rife with other perverted acts that are acceptable in islam, but this one alone condemns islam as a vile cult of perversions and death. And for those who don’t understand how islam can allow male-on-male sex but still call for death for homosexuals, it is because homosexuality usually calls for romantic involvement, which is completely unacceptable in islam. Here is another quote from the Tahrirolvasyleh:
“If a man sodomises the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid.”
In islam, muslims consider women acceptable only for producing children, preferably male. There is a common expression that says, “Women are for children, boys are for pleasure.” While many muslim males enjoy raping women – as with much of rape, the desire is for control, more than sexual gratification – their true preference is for sex with young boys. Look up “bacha bereesh” (beardless boys), and “bacha bazi” (boy play). And although there may be 72 virgins (houri) available for their pleasure when they die, there will _also_ be many young boys available “pearls beyond price”.
Like the disease it is, islam needs to be either contained and isolated permanently, or it must be eradicated entirely.
Angemon says
So open-minded the brains fell off…
gravenimage says
India: Hindu Rape Victim Cries “Please Leave Me for Your Allah’s Sake”
………………..
This poor child did not know why this had no effect. “Allah” sacralizes the rape of Infidels.
God, I hate Islam.
Infidel says
Thankfully, all her rapists got arrested
That’s why, whenever I read a story out of India about vigilantes hunting down mixed religion couples of Muslim grooms and Hindu brides, I just gloss over it, since there’s more often than not a backstory about how it may not have been as consensual as presented in public.
I recently, just for kicks, did a google search for ‘Elopement News’, and one of my first page search results was a Times of India collection. I went and looked into them. The bulk of them were, rather than romantic elopements b/w consenting adults, ‘marriages’ b/w Muslim boys and Hindu minor girls. As a result, they had to be broken up by law enforcement.
So no, when Sam Brownback – the US envoy for religious freedom – tries to tell countries like India, Burma or Sri Lanka to ease up on the persecution of Muslims, particularly in this department of consenting people eloping, naah-ah! Most of those cases involve minors, and even in cases where both are adults, there is coercion involved from the Muslim side. Brownback should instead focus exclusively on Muslim countries and their real persecution of Christians and other minorities
infidel says
‘Oh,., I love U so much Akram.. Finally our parents have relented and consented our marriage,’ Preeti gushed at Akram and threw her arms around his neck and kissed him on his heavily bearded face..
‘Insha-Allah,’ Akram grunted back with a forced smile…
‘So tell me love.. why did U call me here? and that too urgently,’ Preethi looked a bit concerned..
‘I don’t know how to put it across but it is about Ur cousin Vishaal,’ Akram replied at length.
‘What is it about Vishaal?’ (Preethi)
‘U know he is in love with a Muslim girl Asma from my locality Actually that girl is a distant kin of mine.’ (Akram)
‘Yeah I know that Vishaal and Asma are very much in love and just like us they want to get married against much opposition like how we ourselves did face. I understand Ur concerns love, we must help them with everything that they have to get married. Vishaal, I can vouch my life, is a very good boy. He will keep Asma very happy’ (Preethi)
‘U do not understand me baby…I’m actually asking U to tell ur cousin Vishaal to back off. It is for his own good. In fact, today morning, I heard the girl’s father, brothers, and uncles make dangerous threats against Ur cousin and I’m convinced that they are serious. Ur cousin is not willing to convert to Islam and that is the main problem and they are willing to give him a last chance. Vishaal has to embrace Islam before he marries Asma. Else, he has to back off or face dangerous consequences. And this they told me to tell U to tell Ur cousin because he is very close to U’ (Akram)
‘Why can’t they be like us? Like I’m converting to Islam for Ur sake. So why not Asma converting to Hinduism. In fact, they can go one step better. Asma needn’t even convert to Hinduism. She can remain Muslim and I’m sure Vishaal would be extremely OK with that . Why don’t U tell Ur folks at the mosque about this?’ (Preethi)
‘That will be impossible. We Muslims cannot go against Allah. The boy has to convert.’ (Akram
‘Baby be reasonable. This could still work.. believe me.’ (Preethi)
Suddenly the thus far Akram’s gentle demeanor changed… ‘U better listen to me and ask him to either convert or back off.’
‘I’m shocked that U are speaking like this baby. The same rule that applies to us must apply to them too na?’ Ps think.’ (Preethi)
‘U insolent girl,’ Akram seethed in rage. ‘U know we Muslims cannot go against Allah. U better listen and in fact Ur Vishaal better listens. Or I would be forced to behead him myself. In fact, I would not hesitate to behead my own parents if they go against Islam.’ (Akram)
‘My God what happened to U baby.. my love. I’ve never seen U this angry and in fact never seen this religious side of Urs.’ (Preethi)
‘Now that U have seen this .. better get used to it because from now on this is how it is going to stay.’ (Akram)
‘I just cannot believe it that U are talking like this. I just cannot bring myself to agree with U.’ (Preethi)
A resounding slap thundered across Preethi’s face as she fell to the ground completely blindsided. She started to bleed copiously from her nose.
‘FOOLISH GIRL.. this is the last warning for Ur stupid cousin and remember, U too could face huge problems if U do not cooperate in this regard.’ (Akram)
Preethi could not utter a word as she visibly trembled and watched Akram walk away…
(This was my Short Story called LOVE JEHAAD that I had penned a couple years back in response to a competition in a big Indian newspaper on the same topic. Needless to say, the newspaper wrote back to me and refused to accept my story because it could offend lots of people….Needless to say.)
gravenimage says
I’m sure this general story plays out all the time.