Hasn’t “the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, which roughly translates to Council of Indian Muslim Theologians,” gotten the memo that Islamic jihad terrorism has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam, and that jihad terrorists aren’t Muslims? Why, in the West, every non-Muslim politician, great and small, knows that! Pope Francis, call your office!
“Jamiat Ulem-e-Hind extends legal and financial support to Islamists who brutally murdered Hindu activist Kamlesh Tiwari,” OpIndia, October 26, 2019:
The Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, which roughly translates to Council of Indian Muslim Theologians belonging to the Deobandi school of thought has extended legal and financial aid to the Islamists accused in the Kamlesh Tiwari murder. The Muslim Council has said that it is willing to bear all the legal costs and also offered the held of their legal cell to defend the 5 accused in the Kamlesh Tiwari murder….
After the 5 were arrested for brutally murdering Hindu activist Kamlesh Tiwari for allegedly insulting the Prophet of Islam in 2015, Jamaat Ulema-e-Hind met the family members of those arrested and asked then what help they would need in the proceedings. The family members reportedly told the members of the Jamiat that they required legal and financial assistance.
Trick_or_Treat says
It seems that any halfwit idiot can get to be called a ‘scholar’ these days – even that obviously un read and unlearned dropkick inhabiting the Vatican.
Angemon says
Had this taken place in the West, similar organizations would possibly do the same, but under the table, while denouncing them publicly and claiming those criticizing their actions were “islamophobic racists”…
peter says
The left along with their media would have blamed it on Jews and showed how these two victims were brought up under extreme hardship and islamophobia which had caused mental illness in the two young men and made them misunderstand Islam which is a religion of peace and brotherhood !
mortimer says
This is yet more Deobandism. Deobandism is a revivalist that claims ‘Sharia is the answer’ to all the woes of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. It became the religious base for much of the Taliban and many Taliban leaders and fighters studied in Deobandi seminaries. Deobandis were highly influenced by Wahhabism and financed by Saudi Arabia. Deobandi Islam is linked historically to the disenfranchisement of the Mughal rulers in India, so there is a smoldering ‘revanchism’ within it. Some Deobandis opposed the creation of Pakistan because they felt united Muslims would be more powerful without partition.
So, if you see this group as the Indian branch of the Taliban, you wouldn’t be very far off.
Infidel says
True! What is a disgrace is that this sect has a home in India: every adherent of this creed should have been bundled off to Pakistan. And they probably would have been, had it not been for the Nehru/Gandhis
Hopefully, the Hindutva mobs make their lives so miserable that they voluntarily flee to Pakistan
Jaymonu says
Very well said. India was plagued for nearly 7 decades by the egregious ideology and mind-set of the Gandhi-Nehru-Gandhi gang (as I prefer to call them). Clearly, the residual effect still persists. The BJP government under Modi has yet to take decisive steps to eliminate the verminous Islamist terrorist groups that abhor the very idea of India and its ancient Vedic civilisation. Yes, the Modi regime has recently taken very welcome decisions on Jammu & Kashmir, by eliminating the woeful “special status” of that State, but somehow it still allows the nerve centres of Islamist terror to operate openly. This is a scandalous state of affairs that no self-respecting country should permit to continue.
peter says
No patriotic Indian these days can avoid the adjective of Muslim hater by the left wing politicians and media including Hindu . BBC India ,to name a few !
mortimer says
We all know that ISIS have nothin’ to do with Islam … except for the following long list of coincidental, violent practices of canonical, ‘consensus’ Islam …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfqnnbcUVMQ
FYI says
iSLaM has nothing to do with isLAm ,which is different to islaaM and must not be confused with IslAAM
islam’s brighest sparks are depicted in that video.
Linda sarsour ,who styles herself as a “woman of Color”{yeah sure,the color WHITE} who famously said that muhmamed,a polygamous,misogynistic ,chauvinistic woman beater with a 9 year old “wife” was a …….feminist.
Does it really look like muhammed was a feminist?
That’s Zakir Naik,the ‘mehical'{sic} Doctor:a man who once famously said..
“I would rather kill myself than commit suicide”
How can us infidels hope to compete against allah’s best and brightest,eh?
The token white convert{Ginger always for some reason},the women seated at the back{Since they are only worth HALF of a man anyway k2:282} ,the dawa man..
gravenimage says
Thanks for the link, Mortimer,. Sye Ten Atheist’s cartoons are brilliant!
mortimer says
If Jamiat Ulem-e-Hind did not support terrorism, they would not support TERRORISTS with money.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
Essentially, the Pope has no skin in the game. His home is an ocean away.
elee says
Thanks mortimer for your informative posts above. In the thick and tightly contested race to be worst of the worst, the deobandis are a definite contender. Hey India why do you tolerate these bastards? y
Rarely says
Wouldn’t an accused terrorist be given free legal assistance in the U.S. if he otherwise couldn’t afford it?
Is the State therefore a sympathetic supporter of terrorism? Of course not.
One may or may not support an individual’s actions but still support his/her having legal representation.
Also, don’t many muslims consider it obligatory to defend other muslims against the infidel regardless of the crime?
Do I believe that this support is more about supporting the act than supporting the individual’s rights? I may but it doesn’t make it so.
gravenimage says
The American state offers *all* accused free legal assistance if they cannot afford it.
Are you *really* implying that the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind would give legal assistance to Anti-Jihadists, “blasphemers”, apostates or “heretics”? Try again…
Infidel says
Uh, you are discussing India here, not the US
Rarely says
It may not be a right in India (doubtlessly not) but don’t you believe in the principle?
gravenimage says
Rarely, *surely* you don’t believe that what Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind is trying to do here is to offer free legal representation to everyone in India, and it is just coincidental that they happened to give aid to a murderous Jihadist?
Besides, your implication that the accused do not get free representation in India is mistaken:
India:
Article 39A of the Constitution of India, provides for equal justice and free legal aid:
The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aid#India
Carolyne says
Islamic Scholar is an oxymoron.
gravenimage says
India: Leading organization of Islamic scholars gives financial and legal aid to jihad murderers of Hindu leader
………………….
This is what these Muslim thugs support.
infidel says
Another one of those countless evidences that terrorism is inherent in Islam and in fact the soul of Islam