“More to come.”
Oh, no doubt about that. And due to the Left’s pusillanimity and willingness to accept Sharia blasphemy laws under the guise of “hate speech” prohibitions, this kind of thing is coming to the West as well. It won’t start with violence against “blasphemers.” But it will end with it.
“Kamlesh Tiwari murder: UP Police says case solved, remarks on Prophet Muhammad behind killing,” India Today, October 19, 2019:
A lesser-known outfit called the Al-Hind Brigade claimed responsibility late on Friday night for the murder of Hindu Samaj Party president Kamlesh Tiwari here, though the authenticity of the claim could not immediately be verified.
“We at Al-Hind Brigade claim the responsibility for killing Kamlesh Tiwari, who tried to defame Islam and Muslims. More to come,” the outfit said in a WhatsApp message that was widely circulated.
The message, which also carried a photograph Tiwari [sic], said, “Kamlesh Tiwari was a nuisance and whosoever points fingers towards Islam and Muslims, will met same end. Al-Hind Brigade takes the responsibility. Get ready to see more. The war has begun.”
Whether the outfit had links with any global terror organisation was not immediately known…
glendl says
He “tried” to defame .
No one can defame Islam and Moslems than Moslems themselves.
In the mind of the Moslem, even the life of one Infidel is an insult to Islam & Moslems, hence Molsems kill at random and at will.
Ajay says
True ??
mortimer says
Reply to glendl: Yes, Islam is an ‘honor/shame’ culture. The shame of being beneath a kafir can only be washed away with blood. Bloodshed is an ‘honorable’ retaliation for humiliation.
Mike says
I didn’t knew that Islam had its own Anti-Fa .Well, i think it’s a good idea to help their religion progress.
FYI says
“the war has begun”
Actually,islam’s war on humanity ,its war OF Terror,began 1,400 years ago and continues today.
islam and its fraudulently pious adherents defame and attack all other world religions…
mortimer says
The ‘reputation’ (honor) of Islam is protected by Sharia law and Sharia law is protected by vigilantes.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, FYI and Mortimer.
Jayanthi Srinivasan says
The poor guy had already spent a year in jail, in 2016when 1000000 Muslims bayed for his
head., for an alleged insult. A fatwa for a million dollars for his beheading. . He was released and was given police protection. When the guards were out for a short while, they came and shot and beheaded him in broad daylight. They are vengeful and ruthless.
Trick_or_Treat says
Islam has no fame. Infamy definitely.1
mortimer says
Islamic ‘honor’ (reputation) is protected upon the right of Muslims to use vigilantism to settle scores. A kafir who ‘mentions something impermissible about Islam’ is considered a ‘kafir harbi’ (an infidel who is at war with Islam).
Sharia law has no punishment for a Muslim who kills a ‘kafir harbi’. Shari law requires no police intervention when a Muslim kills a ‘kafir harbi’. For a kafir to reduce the reputation of a Muslim by speaking the truth about him is considered an act of war against Islam. Consequently, it is lawful to kill the kafir.
mortimer says
“SLANDER” ACCORDING TO SHARIA
The word “slander” has a substantially different sense in sharia than in Webster’s Dictionary. We would use ‘slander’ to indicate that you have said something that is substantially false or fabricated about someone or something, in such a way as to damage their reputation, but not Islam.
In sharia, the word translated as “slander” is the Arabic word ghiba. It means to say anything about someone that they do not like, even though it is true. This definition was given by Mohammed himself.
Mohammed said, “Do you know what slander is? It is to mention of your brother that which he would dislike.” Someone asked, “What if he is as I say?” And he replied, “If he is as you say, you have slandered him, and if not, you have calumniated him.”
Note that, by definition, Mohammed’s version of slander is something that is true and factual.
ACCUSATIONS OF “SLANDER” BY SHARIA-COMPLIANT MUSLIMS ARE ADMISSIONS OF TRUTH
Whenever there is an act of war committed by radical jihadists against a Western target, we hear that it is wrong to “slander” Islam by suggesting that there was a connection between the jihadist act and the religion that preaches jihad.
The remark is not slander in the ordinary English sense of the word, but rather is ghiba: something that is true but offensive to hear.
When the word is translated this way, ordinary listeners will understand that the accusation being called “slander” is false.
In fact, what they are really saying is that you should not speak this particular truth because it harms
the ‘image’ of Islam and some Muslims are embarrassed by it.
ACCUSATIONS OF “SLANDER” ARE A TOOL OF SHARIA CONTROL
Suggestions that you must not say true things that displease Muslims are a form of dawa, the call to Islam that by Islamic law must precede jihad.
Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, told a Toledo, Ohio, Muslim Arab Youth Association convention in 1995, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through the sword, but through dawa.”
Accusations of slander work both to silence critics of Islam and to make the society submit to Islamic values. Even without knowing that they are obeying sharia, those silenced are being forced to comply with sharia’s definition of “slander.”
They are being subjugated to Islamic law without knowing it.
OTHER WAYS SHARIA CONTROLS WHAT YOU’RE ALLOWED TO KNOW
In addition to “slander,” Mohammed forbade “talebearing.”
“[T]alebearing… lies in divulging a secret, in revealing something confidential whose disclosure is resented. A person should not speak of anything he notices about people besides that which benefits a Muslim to relate or prevents disobedience.”
The disclosure of any sensitive information to non-Muslims is forbidden, where sensitive means any information that puts Islam or a Muslim at a disadvantage.
Hence, a sharia-adherent Muslim risks eternal damnation if he discloses to a non-believer information that would cause the non-believer to question either Islam or a Muslim.
gravenimage says
In sharia, the word translated as “slander” is the Arabic word ghiba. It means to say anything about someone that they do not like, even though it is true. This definition was given by Mohammed himself.
………………….
Spot on, Mortimer.
Sangeeta kukreti kandwal says
The captured Islamic militants admitted that killing non-Muslims in the Quran Sharif is not a crime. 72 virgins get to kill non-Muslims ..
Tony Naim says
I believe it is about time we make a concerted effort with the United Nations to declare the practice of
Dhimmitude by any government as a form
Of discrimination equal to racism, that ought to be outlawed and abolished . This has to become the law of every land without exceptions.
mortimer says
Thanks to TN: your legal brain is switched on. YES! Let us sue Islam for RACISM against all KAFIRS.
mortimer says
Agree with TN. Islam slanders ALL kafirs.
elee says
And did you think that the ruling of some kafir judge would stay the soldiers of al Lah? As I mentioned in another thread today……he who sues the Mafia often feeds the fishes, and did you think the muslim hordes are more genteel or law-abiding than the Mafia?
Aussie Infidel says
Agree with Tony, This is exactly what is required. Muslims are only too ready to use ‘lawfare’ against non-Muslims. Why should we just take all their crap and not retaliate?. Let’s turn the tables on them for a change. Not only is the Quran offensive to all non-Muslims, because it is the most racist book of scripture ever written, but Islam is a threat to the national security of every democratic country. Now all we need are some politicians with guts to bring this up at the UN, and take action to stop it. They will get plenty of criticism, and it won’t happen overnight.
peter says
/agreed! You have made a good case against islam and islmism! I could not have put it better!
gravenimage says
The UN is dominated by Muslim countries and their unfree allies, so sadly good luck with this.
Lotus says
I’m sure this killing is not by Muslims. Because Islam is a religion of peace!
I remember being told that by George W Bush, the well-known expert on Islam, in the days after 9/11. He wouldn’t lead us astray, would he? /sarc
aDhimmiSaysWhat? says
Glad you brought this up. I remember that speech. First time I ever heard Islam being a ‘religion of peace’. Obama also heaped praise on Islam every chance he got. My point is, this is not a democrat/Republican issue. We need to be United as critics of a horrible ideology.
Ray Jarman says
Who cares, “Whether the outfit had links with any global terror organisation was not immediately known…” Organized murder is murder and needs to be stamped out no matter where or to what organization ordered the atrocity. The only fact necessary to understand is that this “Al-Hind Brigade” is a terrorist organization of Islamists.
elee says
What do you call a man who goes about looking to start fights with anyone who speaks in his presence? An impulsive sociopath, or a belligerent bastard, or words to that effect. So what do you call a billion and a half people who do this or endorse it when others purport to do it on their behalf? A major world religion, I guess……. Anyway, make no concessions to this evil cult and prosecute them for their crimes. Hey Indians, dont forget the last time they got their hands on your government.
SAFI says
How did he try to defame Islam? Did he say Muslims are violent? Did he say they have a tendency to murder critics? How dare he!
Battle says
Kamlesh Tiwari alleged crime was being Hundu leader.
Battle says
(Typo) a Hindu leader.
gravenimage says
India: Muslim group says it murdered Hindu leader because he “tried to defame Islam and Muslims”
……………….
Hideous–this poor man.
God, I hate Islam.
gravenimage says
And “Al -Hind” is the Muslim name for India–this is a threat to conquer India.
Angemon says
What are the odds he was just speaking the truth?….
Aussie Infidel says
Psychopaths and narcissists cannot bear to be criticized or rejected. This war has been ongoing since Muhammad (Islam’s original narcissist), took offence at his obviously concocted religion being rejected by non-Muslims 1,400 years ago. In recent times, that war has been a ‘defensive jihad’ against anyone who criticizes Islam. How long will it take for dhimmi western politicians to be ‘woke’ to the fact that they are at war; that these attacks are not just isolated criminal acts, but a well orchestrated guerrilla campaign “by vigilantes” protecting the (sic) “honor of Islam and its iniquitous Sharia” – and take the necessary action to stop it.
toomanyhobbies says
so much for the CULT of Islam’s tolerance…