We are constantly told in the West that Sharia is entirely benign, and that only racist, bigoted “Islamophobes” think otherwise. In reality, Islam mandates death for non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state who mention “something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam” (‘Umdat al-Salik, o11.10), and such laws are based upon passages in the Hadith and Sira in which Muhammad orders the murders of people who have insulted him.
These include Abu Afak, who was over one hundred years old, and the poetess Asma bint Marwan. Abu Afak was killed in his sleep, in response to Muhammad’s question, “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” Similarly, Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of his followers, Umayr ibn Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)
Then there was Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf. Muhammad asked: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the Muslims, Muhammad bin Maslama answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Sahih Bukhari, volume 5, book 59, number 369)
“Two accused in Kamlesh Tiwari murder case believed their action justified: Gujarat Police,” ANI, October 23, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Two of the prime accused in Kamlesh Tiwari murder case believed that killing of the Hindu Samaj Party leader was “justified as per Sharia”, a Gujarat police official said on Wednesday.
The accused Ashfaq Hussain Jakir Hussain Shaikh (34) and Moinuddin Khurshid Pathan (27) were arrested by Gujarat Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) from the Gujarat-Rajasthan border on Tuesday.
“Upon interrogation, we came to know that they contacted many maulvis. One of the maulvis was Mohsin. They were told and were convinced that the murder is justified as per the Sharia law,” said BH Chavda, Deputy SP, Gujarat Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS)….
RichardL says
For all those people disinformed by the MSM, there are two islams and two sharia codes. As long as so-called conservatives fail to attack this narrative, nothing will change.
Peter Samuel says
I say as long as the peaceful Muslims fail to attack this Sharia on a global level nothing will change …its like a Box of M& M’ chocolates of which 5 M& M in that box is poisonous…how will we know which one it is . …
gravenimage says
Few Muslims really oppose Shari’ah. And why would they? This is orthodox Islam.
John says
islam is islam, as islamic countries prove, all the World’s Satanic FILTH.
D J says
I always like to quote that bit in the Koran where it says: Thou shalt not kill…oops, sorry, wrong book.
melek-ric says
It’s interesting that of all the prophets in Islamic tradition, Muhammed is the only one who had his critics assassinated. When do we hear of Abraham murdering critics? Which poets did Moses kill? How many singing girls of Mecca (or anywhere else) did Noah bump off? How about Jesus? Surely he had a few inconvenient detractors silenced? No?
I wonder what Muslims would have to say about this odd situation…
Jayell says
There must be a technical term in psychiatry to describe a condition of insanity whereby one loses one’s grip on reality and fails to understand basic concepts of historical perspective. For example, mankind was not actually around with cine cameras at the time of the dinosaurs to record fantastic feats of human heroism against these prehistoric giants despite what the scriptwritera of Disney feature films might like you to believe. And King Arthur and his Knights were nor summarily nicked by the local police in their squad cars as was suggested in ‘Monty Python and the Holy Grail’ because – surprise surprise! – neither county police forces nor automibiles had been invented in King Arthur’s time! Now here’s a similat revelation that might interest Melek-ric. When Abraham, Moses and Jesus (and the rest of them) were around, islam hadn’t been invented either! That’s because its inventor wasn’t born until over 6 centuries after the last of those characters had died. So they couldn’t have known anything at all about Mohammed’s beautiful philosophies, therefore could not have been in the least ‘islamic’, and therefore would probably not have felt the slightest desire to go around bumping off people who didn’t agree with them (as suggested by a certain a certain ‘Great Prophet’ from around 600AD). Does that seem fairly clear and logical? If not, perhaps one needs something a little bit stronger than just educational treatment.
melek-ric says
Jayell, Jayell, Jayell. What are we going to do with you? Surely with your advanced grasp of historical perspective you must know that according to Muhammed himself, Abraham, Moses, Noah and Jesus were all Muslims, and Muslim prophets at that, bringing the word of Allah to their people. Given that fact, as established by Islamic doctrine, I ask again – why was every Muslim prophet prior to Muhammed able to fulfill his prophetic mandate without butchering his critics? We don’t need cine cameras as you facetiously suggest; we have the word of the Seal of the Prophets!
gravenimage says
This is true–Muslims have appropriated Jesus and all the Jewish prophets.
Geof Barrington says
Malec ric malek ric malek ric
What are we going to do with you …you must realize that mohamed was not a profit . He was a lot more like the American TV evangelists who realized that religon pays . He therefore made up a religon based on existing religons . Mohamed is only a fake
gravenimage says
Geof, how is the “Prophet” Muhammed like American TV evangelists? I find them a bit cheesy generally, but whop among them are calling for child “marriage”, rape and mass murder of unbelievers? Citations, please.
John says
Christianity teaches that the God of the Bible is the source of all knowledge. (Proverbs 1:7).
According to Islam the source of all knowledge is the Qur’an, the Hadiths, and the Bible.The Qur’an says that the Bible is a previous revelation from God. (Surah 6:114 “…Those unto whom We gave the Scripture [the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)] know that it is revealed from your Lord in truth…”; Surah 5:46 “And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah; (The Law of Moses) and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous.” FACT, Jesus had been DEAD for over 50 YEARS when the Gospels were Written so no way did allah give Jesus the Gospels. allah is the god of Pagan Arabia and Not The God of Jesus, Moses and Abraham. quran 4;157 “SAHIH INTERNATIONAL And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah .” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.” quran says Jesus was not Crucified or Resurrected but the Gospels in which the quran says allah gave a DEAD Jesus says He WAS Crucified and Resurrected . MASSIVE CONTRADICTION from the Fraudulent SATANIC quran. Surah 3:54 says, “Allah is the greatest of all deceivers.” How then can you trust him?
Proof that the Bible alone is true
1. If the Qur’an is true, the Bible is true. (Surah 6:114 ; Surah 6:34 ; Surah 6:115)
2. The Bible is true, and teaches that any revelation that contradicts it is false.
3. The Qur’an contradicts the Bible.
4. Therefore, the Qur’an is false. The name of Allah originated in polytheism and long before Islam ever arose. Mohammed was born in 570 and began preaching about his new religion of Islam (with Allah as its god) around 610. He gained 150 converts in his first 13 years of evangelism in Mecca and then went to Medina where he pursued physical, or combat, jihad while acquiring 100,000 converts up until his death in 632 A.D. using the name of Allah. However, the god name Allah had existed several centuries before Mohammed co-opted it as the god of Islam. Allah was a truncated form of Al-Ilah, one of the 360 pagan deities worshipped by the nomadic pagan and polytheistic Arabs at the Kaaba in Mecca before, during, and after the time of Christ.Mohammed’s father was also named Abdullah (meaning “slave of Allah”.) A tribe of Jews was called Abdullah bin Salam in the Bukhari Hadith.
John says
Islam is not a religion, but a complete barbaric civilization. Islam has a position or rule for every aspect of life. It is a religion, culture and political system, a complete way of life. If Islam were only a religion, it would be of no concern. As an example, Buddhism is a religion, how much media and political space is concerned about Buddhism? Buddhism makes no demands on a civilization. Islam makes demands on every facet of society.
Totalitarianism is a political system of absolute power where the state has no limit to its authority and regulates most aspects of public and private life. There are no competing political parties since they would balance and limit authority. The critical element of totalitarianism is absolute power striving to rule in as many areas of life as possible.
Totalitarianism in Islamic Doctrine
Totalitarianism is found in the very name, Islam. Islam means submission, submission to the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. We see the basis for absolute power in Mohammed’s life. After he went to Medina, he became a jihadist and attacked his neighbors. When he arrived in Medina, it was half Jewish. In two years, there were no more Jews left in Medina. They were exiled, assassinated, enslaved and executed. Mohammed attacked the pagans of Arabia and the Jews. After Arabia submitted to Islam, Mohammed turned to Syria and attacked the Christians.
In the end, Political Islam will not tolerate opposition. After Mohammed died, Abu Bakr, his closest companion, became caliph. His first order was to attack and crush the Muslims who wanted to leave Islam. Everyone must submit to Islam and once a Muslim, you must remain a Muslim, or you can be punished.
The next companion of Mohammed who became caliph was Umar. His ten year rule was spent in jihad conquest of the Christian and Zoroastrian Kafirs.
Turkey used to be called Anatolia or Asia Minor and was a Christian civilization. Today Turkey is over 95% Muslim. North Africa, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon used to be Christian. Afghanistan was Buddhist; Pakistan and Malaysia used to be Hindu. Today they are more than 95% Muslim. Islam does not reach a balance point with the native civilization; it dominates and annihilates the indigenous culture over time.
This process of total civilizational domination is the Law of Islamic Saturation. The doctrine calls for jihad to never cease until the native population submits to the Sharia. As time goes on, the Sharia brings about submission to Islam. The doctrine is totalitarian, so the result is totalitarian.
Islam is the most successful totalitarian system in history. There are post-Communist societies and post-Nazi societies but, there are no post Islamic societies.
gravenimage says
Pious Muslims consider assassinating critics warranted, and consider the fact that Jews and Christians and other civilized people have not done this to be proof that they are not devoted enough. Sick but true.
Angemon says
“Were convinced”? As in “they believe so, but…”, the implication being it was not justified by sharia?
Jaladhi says
And hanging these basta**ds will be justified per our laws!!
peter says
I think we should first hang the media crooks who are in co hots with the islamists spreading the false narrative that Islam is a religion of peace and mohammed was the greatest example to humanity.
gravenimage says
Agent provocateur.
DHazard says
If Allah said he hates someone who blasphemes his messenger then are Muslims obligated to act on Allah’s behalf, even though Allah is going to administer a punishment incalculably worse than anything a Muslim could possibly inflict? I don’t know, ask a Muslim scholar. “Mr. Bukhari, what is your opinion on the matter?” “Hold on, Muslim zombies life off the misery caused by living Muslims around the World…..OK, somebody was just honor murdered for Allah, feeling better…..this is an easy one. Muslim’s are instructed to emulate the Prophet (swf), He (pduh) put out hits on his detractors, so guess what a Muslim should do? That’s right, kill ’em.
gravenimage says
India: Muslims who killed Hindu leader say the murder was justified by Sharia
………………..
Yes–this *is* Shari’ah. This is the horror of Islamic law, which does not belong in any civilized nation.
Infidel says
Not just that, India is not a Muslim country, and the victim was not a Muslim. Therefore, shariah law doesn’t apply to either.
This is precisely why I side w/ the most extreme Hindutva advocates who state that Muslims have no place in India, and should be expelled to either Pakistan or Bangladesh – both countries which were carved out solely due to religion (otherwise Bangladesh could have re-merged w/ India in 1971)
gravenimage says
Absolutely, Infidel. Muslims still make up just 13% of the population in India–but they are constantly trying to impose Shari’ah law there. It is, grimly, only going to get worse as the population grows.
Also–as I’m sure you know–while the Muslim population of India has grown steadily since 1947, Pakistan and Bangladesh have almost wiped out their Hindu, Sikh, and Christian populations.
John says
“the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)” muhammad(MHCRIH) may he continually Rot in Hell.
dsr says
A religion that allows killing of people?, what kind of religion is this muslim crap? They sound like a bunch of nazi’s.
peter says
It is an insult to Nazis .Nazis were much more honest than muslims. They did not say that Hitler was God and Mein Kemp was bible sent by God but it was the work of Hitler and Co .