“When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks…” (Qur’an 47:4)
Kamlesh Tiwari was brutally murdered for insulting Muhammad. There is no way to claim this murder was a manifestation of “mental illness” or one of the other fashionable explanations for jihad in the West. That may be why the establishment media in the West has largely ignored it.
“Kamlesh Tiwari’s post mortem report reveals he was stabbed 15 times, murderers tried to slit his neck twice,” OpIndia, October 23, 2019:
Horrific details have emerged from the post-mortem report in the Kamlesh Tiwari murder case, which reveals that the Hindu leader Kamlesh Tiwari was stabbed 15 times and was also once by the Islamists, reports India Today.
According to the reports, the post-mortem report has revealed that Kamlesh Tiwari was stabbed 15 times. The Islamists had stabbed him in the upper part of the body from jaws to the chest. The wounds were inflicted within 10 cm of each another. The post-mortem report suggests that there were two deep cut marks on the neck points to attempt to slit his throat.
Reportedly, the attackers had also shot him once to make sure that he dies in the attack. The bullet was fired in his face. The doctors conducting a post-mortem on Kamlesh Tiwari’s body found a point 32 bullet on the backside of the skull.
Kamlesh Tiwari, the Hindu Samaj Party leader was murdered in Lucknow on October 18 when the assailants came to meet him on the pretext of working for his outfit. He was murdered at his home in Naka Hindola area in Lucknow.
Last night, in a major breakthrough, the Gujarat ATS had nabbed Ashfaq and Moinuddin, the two prime accused in the case from Gujarat-Rajasthan border. A team led by DIG ATS Himanshu Shukla arrested Ashfaqhussain Jakirhussain Shaikh, a medical representative in a pharma company and Moinuddin Khurshid Pathan, who worked as a food delivery boy. The duo was caught after they approached their family members after they ran out of the money they had.
Kamlesh Tiwari, a former Hindu Mahasabha leader, was assassinated at his Lucknow office by Ashfaq and Moinuddin from Surat. The Uttar Pradesh police and Gujarat ATS sprung into action to blow the lid off a Surat-based Jihadi group that was indoctrinated by one of the accused who planned the murder, Maulana Mohsin Sheikh….
FYI says
muhammed?
muhammed was{according to islamic sources}..a..
Fat Dwarf {Abu Dawud 40:4731}
Cross dresser{sahih Bukhari 54:7:2442}
Slave Trader in Black Africans{sahih muslim 3901}
FAILED prophet:he failed the Poison Test{ibn sa’ad pg 252,sahih bukhari 4428}
muhammed:
A fat,cross-dressing.african slave trading,dwarf and a failed prophet who claimed he had a magical FLYING HORSEY:mo the “perfect” man.
Indeed.
The great warrior who desperately wanted to die in battle but allah didn’t facilitate him
{He died in battle alright,but with a poisoned leg of lamb}?
Sahih Bukhari 2797
The great “prophet” who FAILED{yes,FAILED}the Poison Test thus proving himself,by the koran’s own criterion{koran 69:44-46},to be false
{Sahih bukhari 2617,sahih muslim 5430,ibn sa’ad pg252,sahih bukhari 4428}
“I feel as if mu aorta has been cut” he said.
The great prophet who said in al tabari 6:111 “I have fabricated things against God”?
The great prophet who said women have a “deficiency of the mind”{the reason WHY the koran says a woman’s testimony is HALF that of a man k2:282}?
And who was the creative chef that cunningly applied the Poison Test that exposed muhammed the chauvinistic misogynistic polygamous charlatan as a fraud?
A captured JEWISH woman:muhammed outsmarted by a woman with her deficient mind,surely the worst insult.and the great “prophet” didn’t see THAT coming and his Arab god al LAH didn’t save him.
The WORST POSSIBLE ending for muhammed was to be..
1)Exposed as a false prophet{which he was when he failed the Poison Test}
2)Unable to die in battle as a warrior{muhammed thus never was himself a martyr}
3}outsmarted by and Killed by a woman..a Jewish woman,to add insult to injury
{muhammed was a mass-murder of Jews Abu Dawud 4390}
islamic teachings ridicule and insult muhammed.
Angemon says
Insulting islam doesn’t necessarily mean to say something false or offensive – it also means to say something that is true but muslims preferred it not to be known…
KWJ says
To be a little more accurate, if you read the volume, chapter on Dress in Sahih Bucjari’s Hadith (I’m not home to give you the specific #’s) Muhammad is described by different narrators in several ways. One says he was neither tall nor short, another says he was neither white nor dark. There are three descriptions of his hair length to his ear lobes, between his earlobes and shoulders and to his shoulders. One says he dyed his hair, another said he had few grey hairs that would require dyeing it, and that he died with little grey hair.
There is agreement on wearing a beard that should not be longer that what you grab in you fist below the chin. However, it is not mandatory but ardently suggested. (Heck, the king of Saudi Arabia has just a goatee.)
There are other conflicts of narrations about women’s dress. The ahadith is so unreliable and obvious that sayings allegedly by Muhammad are very suspect and expedient to the narrator at that time as well as political.
Yet a large portion of sharia law is based on the ahadith with pick and choose narrations. Therefore, a Muslim man can justify wearing his hair in three different ways. So, for instance, ISIS has followed any of these choices as they see fit usually bending to the Salafist view which really means the more stricter choices.
So, Muhammad was not necessarily fat or short nor thin or tall. Abu Al-Qasim, to me, was surely invented with the Syriac praise name for the Christian Jesus. He was probably more just like a cult leader bossing people around, creating rules, and wanted to conquer the world for power and booty like many before him. Extract all the Biblical stories (twisted as they are) and some of the known Christian tales such as The Cave chapter, and I think that’s Islam…nothing much spiritual of a holy or divine nature. To me, such a view makes things simpler. Killing people over blasphemy in 2019 as centuries ago is a good discussion about the psychology behind such aggression.
Perhaps it gives a sense of power in deciding who lives or dies or Muhammad’s ego or some kind of internal inferiority or festering guilt for being fraudulent. I don’t know but it’s quite pathologically sick and weak of mind.
FYI says
Of course it doesn’t matter what he looked like although islamic source emphasise his whiteness{see on YT acts17 apologetics muhammed the white prophet with the black slaves :it his behavior and example that need to be addressed.{See Prophet of Doom}
ABU DAWUD 4390:muhammed mass murdering the Jews .
This demolishes the sanitized vision of muhammed as a man of peace as promoted by naive pro-islam .academics/
SAHIH MUSLIM 3901 selling African slaves
A man who is a mass-murder and slave seller cannot possibly be a morally good example.
Mario Alexis Portella says
God rest his soul. Horrible, as always, but what else is to be expected from such an immoral religion? https://thegreatarchitect.blog/2019/10/26/2437/
gravenimage says
India: Muslims who murdered Hindu leader for insulting Muhammad stabbed him 15 times, tried to slit his throat twice
……………….
Just horrifying–this poor man.
God. I hate Isl;am.