INSIDE MOSQUES
INVESTIGATING AND EVALUATING THREAT LEVELS
INTRODUCTION:
Dave Gaubatz is a former U.S. Federal Agent with Top Secret/SCI clearance, expert in counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism on national security issues, highly trained in Islamic ideology and tactics, Arab linguist, author of Muslim Mafia, has investigated over 300 mosques/Islamic Centers in the USA and 150 outside USA, and after leaving his position in the government continued this work as a Civilian Agent. Using firsthand investigation, he then evaluates Risk/Threat Levels based on multiple factors including Materials on Premises and What They Advocate, Ties to Muslim Terrorists, and Sharia Adherence. Mr. Gaubatz estimates that 80% of mosques in America recruit and train in jihad (violent & civilization). Finally, he makes Recommendations to protect America, our citizens, our children. He asks about each mosque: Would ISIS be proud?
NOTE: Several Reports/Affidavits will be published. When you read one from earlier dates, note that Dave Gaubatz issued Risk/Danger warnings ahead, but in some cases, violence occurred later from a member of one of those reported mosques (ex: Trolley Square, Salt Lake City, Utah shooting; child abuse Nashville, TN). When you read a report that came after an attack (Ex: Report 2017, Boston Marathon Bombing by the Tsarnaev brothers in 2013), note that violence had already occurred, Mr. Gaubatz reported continued Risk/Danger years later from the same mosques terrorists had attended. Reading professionally investigated and evaluated Reports/Affidavits from various years is important so the American public is aware of new or continuing Risk/Danger and can demand protection from all levels of government officials and law enforcement that they are sworn to provide.
ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
MANCHESTER, NH
JUNE 30, 2017
On June 30, 2017, I conducted firsthand research at the Islamic Society of New Hampshire. I am a former U.S. Federal Agent who specialized in counter-intelligence and counterterrorism, specifically Islamic based terrorism. I have worked and lived in the Middle East since 1978. I was the first U.S. civilian federal agent in Iraq at the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom (Mar 2003). In the U.S. alone I have conducted firsthand research at over 280 Islamic mosques. I have placed undercover researchers in Muslim Brotherhood organizations and obtained valuable national security intelligence. Based on my professional analysis of my visit to the Islamic Center of New Hampshire (ISoNH) I report the following:
The ISoNH is a Sunni/Saudi and Pakistani front for Islamic based terrorists groups such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. This mosque had very violent materials inside for worshippers that advocate the overthrow of America and physical Jihad against U.S. and Israeli targets. This is based on the mosque having the same Islamic manuals in their possession that Islamic terrorist groups utilize for their training. The ISoNH had material written and edited by a convicted Islamic terrorist supporter (Ali AlTimimi). The Imam and mosque worshippers were extremely Shariah compliant. ISIS and Al Qaeda would find this mosque acceptable for their training and education of Mujahadeen fighters (Islamic terrorists).
On a scale of 1 -10, with 10 being the most extreme, I rate this mosque a 10. My rating of a 10 indicates I determine the ISoNH is a terrorist safe haven for Islamic sleeper cell Jihadists and there is a strong likelihood violent Jihadist activity will be conducted by “sleeper terrorists” attending this particular mosque.
It is imperative U.S. law enforcement use legal means to fully investigate the leadership and worshippers of this mosque. The mosque should be closed down immediately based on their advocating of establishing an Islamic caliphate worldwide and under Shariah law.
Electronically signed: (12 July 2017) Dave Gaubatz
U.S. Federal Agent (retired)
Author: Muslim Mafia
SUMMARY OF RATINGS: (scale 1-10 with 10 being the most extreme)
Sharia Score: 10
Jihad Score: 9
Threat Score: 10 (Sharia Level plus Jihad Level, then follow scale with 19-20 total = 10)
Hiding in plain sight: New Hampshire mosque preaches terrorism
James Simpson / September 6, 2017
A concerned New Englander recently arranged for the assessment of the Islamic Society of New Hampshire’s (ISoNH) mosque in Manchester in that state. He had noticed a disproportionate number of military-age males visiting the mosque and heard from many local women who said they were frightened by the attitudes some of these men expressed toward them. The results of the man’s research were more frightening.
David Gaubatz, co-author of Muslim Mafia, was hired to assess this mosque. He is a former Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) federal agent who specialized in Islamic counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism. According to his book, he worked and lived in the Middle East for decades and was the first civilian federal agent in Iraq at the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom (March 2003). That year he led a 15-man team to extract family members of the Iraqi lawyer who helped save Army Private First Class Jessica Lynch. He has investigated over 280 mosques in the U.S. alone and uses a rating system developed by a former Islamist, Tafik Hamid.
U.S. Islamists and their allies in the American Left have long sought to discredit this rating system as contrived nonsense created by Islamophobes, but that very effort calls into question their motives, expertise, and integrity. Tafik Hamid is a former member of Jamaa Islamiya (also known as al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya or, in English, Islamic Group), — an Egyptian organization branded a terrorist group by the U.S. government, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was a member of this group, as was Omar Abdel-Rahman, the so-called “blind sheikh” convicted as the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Hamid has long since abandoned his radicalism and has become a widely-recognized Islamic reformer.
The rating system is based on numerous factors readily observant by how strictly the mosque conforms to Islamic standards and how aggressively it promotes Shariah (Islamic law). For example, are men and women allowed to worship in the same room? What kind of dress is mandatory, e.g. must women wear a niqab or hijab? Can they get away with a modern form of hijab? How does the imam dress? Details like rings worn and style of pants indicate the imam’s devotion to Wahhabism or other Islamic sects and to Shariah itself.
The imam’s dedication to Shariah is especially important because Shariah is a doctrine of political dominance and conquest, and Muslims who promote it are likely to promote jihad as a means to impose it.
The system also rates the mosque based on messages taught in sermons. For example, does the mosque promote the killing of gays, killing for apostasy, stoning women for infidelity, and Shariah-sanctioned slavery?
Gaubatz found that ISoNH was strictly observant and promoted all these ideas and more. Using a 1 to 10 rating scale, with 10 being the worst, Gaubatz assigned a grade of 10 for Shariah compliance and 9 for jihadist potential. He concluded:
The ISoNH is a Sunni/Saudi and Pakistani front for Islamic based terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. This mosque had very violent materials inside for worshippers that advocate the overthrow of America and physical Jihad against U.S. and Israeli targets. This is based on the mosque having the same Islamic manuals in their possession that Islamic terrorist groups utilize for their training. The ISoNH had material written and edited by a convicted Islamic terrorist supporter (Ali Al Timimi). The Imam and mosque worshippers were extremely Shariah compliant. ISIS and Al Qaeda would find this mosque acceptable for their training and education of Mujahideen fighters (Islamic terrorists).
Some of the literature referred to is:
A Brief Illustrated Guide to Understanding Islam was edited by twelve Islamic “scholars.” I have circled two names. Ali Al-Timimi — whom Gaubatz referenced — is now serving a life sentence for terrorism. Sheik Jamal Zarabozo is considered “too extreme” even for some Islamists as he advocates stoning to death for “heretics.”
Another brochure promoted at the mosque is Jihad in Islam. This 33-page document makes clear that the goals of Islam are to subjugate the world. Under the heading What Jihad Really Is? (sic) it states:
In reality Islam is a revolutionary ideology and programme which seeks to alter the social order of the whole world and rebuild it in conformity with its own tenets and ideals. ‘Muslim’ is the title of that International Revolutionary Party organized by Islam to carry into effect its revolutionary programme. And ‘Jihād’ refers to that revolutionary struggle and utmost exertion which the Islamic Party brings into play to achieve this objective…
…Islam requires the earth—not just a portion, but the whole planet—not because the sovereignty over the earth should be wrested from one nation or several nations and vested in one particular nation, but because the entire mankind should benefit from the ideology and welfare programme or what would be truer to say from ‘Islam’ which is the programme of well-being for all humanity. Towards this end, Islam wishes to press into service all forces which can bring about a revolution and a composite term for the use of all these forces is ‘Jihad’. (p. 5)
Many U.S. mosques are little more than meeting places and training centers for Islamic terrorists. For example, the Tsarnaev brothers and many other terrorists regularly attended the Islamic Society of Boston. Why is it still open?
Officials at all levels of government, including within many police forces, have been gripped by a fever of political correctness that virtually guarantees we will remain blind to the danger such mosques pose until it is too late.
Former Manchester Ward 2 Republican State Rep. Greg Salts read aloud from Gaubatz’s report on the Manchester mosque at a recent public meeting of the local Board of Mayor and Aldermen. The response from elected officials was predictable. Instead of seriously considering Gaubetz’s warning, they acted offended, using the familiar slur popularized by the Southern Poverty Law Center, “hate speech.”
Following are some of their comments as published in Manchester’s Union Leader:
Alderman Chairman Patrick Long: “Personally this hate talk has no place in this city, that’s just my opinion.”
Alderman-at-Large Dan O’Neil: “There is no need in the city of Manchester for hatred. I know this board won’t stand for it; our citizens won’t stand for it.”
Manchester Chief of Police Nick Willard: “What [Gaubatz] wrote in this piece of paper is slanderous. I do not believe the mosque is a hotbed for terrorism. I don’t trust this gentleman’s research. I think he is trying to sell a book. I think the guy is a crackpot and I don’t believe we have those issues in this city.
As quoted in the newspaper, Gaubatz responded:
I get that same reaction a lot of the time. They don’t want to admit they have a problem in their area and it took an outsider to find it and identify it.
Gaubatz added to those remarks during a telephone interview for this article:
In response to Chief Willard’s ill-considered remarks I say this: ‘Chief Willard is a poor excuse for a senior law enforcement officer. He has no clue what to look for in a mosque. The tax payers of his community deserve a Chief who supports them and not mosque leaders who support the teachings of ISIS. Finally, I do not receive any royalties for my book, so it is both ignorant and insulting to dismiss my report as an effort to sell books. It was provided for the benefit and as a warning to the Manchester community. What does the Chief care more about, Manchester or the mosque?’
At every level, we see daily demonstrations of how corrupt and incompetent our “leaders” have become. This is a situation that cannot stand. We still have the vote. I hope it can save us from these useful idiots for Islamism before the terrorism being contemplated in many corners throughout the U.S. strikes yet again.
I am not holding my breath.
In This Story:
Islamic Society of New Hampshire
The Author
James Simpson is an investigative journalist, businessman and author. His latest book is The Red Green Axis: Refugees, Immigration and the Agenda to Erase America.
mortimer says
I like his score card method for grading mosque ideology: e.g. Sharia Score: 10 – Jihad Score: 9 – Threat Score: 10 .
If there could be a ‘report card’ published on every mosque, the public would be able to elect politicians to take their threats seriously.
The public is still generally unaware that every mosque is a supremacist cell group plotting the overthrow of the constitution.
We should let Muslims know that we understand their agenda. When enough people understand the agenda of Islam, many Muslim fanatics will go to another country, since they will accept the hopelessness of trying impose Sharia supremacism on an aware, vigilant populace.
jimmy rooks says
Problem! The U.S. is considered “The Great Satan” by ALL Muslims, so I seriously doubt any of them are open to debate!
Christopher Watson says
‘they will accept the hopelessness of trying impose Sharia..’
That’s a very gullible reaction. No they won’t. They will simply kill you. Throughout history they have only been dislodged by warfare and violence. If anybody thinks they will leave simply because people don’t believe them then they are in for a very painful lesson. People tend to agree when they are staring into the business end of a gun.
LytchZam says
Scorecard! Get yer Scorecard here!
Let’s imagine this for some “Far Right Wing Neo Nazi Group”…
e.g.
Reich Score: 0.01
Aggression Score: 2
Threat Score: 0.5
Would that be acceptable?
Why would any positive score for a mosque based on jihad, threat, or sharia be ok – at any level above zero? .
Dave says
Are we taking bets on who “the concerned New Englander” is?
With the primary season upon us can state of this mosque be made an issue?
Senator Warren on a scale of 1 – 10 how would you rate this mosque? Senator Warren is Islam right about women? Senator Warren is Islam right about Gays? Senator Warren is Islam right about Jews?…
nobody says
Pocci is an idealogical nut, she represents every aspect of our higher education system! Brain washing our youth to the point of no critical thought simply heard mentality & feel good phrases with allot ot “free” stuff! What a insulated nut!
ME Infidel says
Dave Gaubatz is a thorough investigator. We invited him to Maine in June of 2014 to review some mosques in Lewiston and Portland where they were rated “High” in his SAR evaluations. Several of us ACT for America members personally handed Dave’s sworn affidavits to then Governor Paul LePage who is the Maine version of Donald Trump. He said he would give these papers to the appropriate department. Now, 5 years later, these mosques are still in business. Just goes to prove how dangerous political correctness really is or to expose how entrenched the Muslim Brotherhood is in our institutions.
James Lincoln says
ME Infidel,
My compliments for your efforts. My guess is that then Gov. Paul LePage did pass these along to the appropriate department, but that’s where it ended.
It’s a shame that Shawn Moody lost to Janet Mills – there is certainly no way that she is going to look into these mosques.
LB says
Not that I don’t appreciate what Dave is doing, on the contrary; it is extremely encouraging to see more and more people waking up against the threat of islam. I just feel like the whole scoring system is kind of pointless for two reasons:
1) No mosque that has any idea what its doing will just let a non-muslim thoroughly investigate it inside-out. Most mosques will outright bar non-muslims from entering, or at the very least try its best to hide all anti-infidel material. So it’s questionable just how accurate any mosque investigation really is.
and 2) It doesn’t really matter what “score” a mosque has in various criteria such as “jihad” or “sharia”. ALL MOSQUES teach the exact same original form of islam that caused the deaths of hundreds of millions of non-muslims throughout history since its inception. Needless to say that they all 100% support sharia and jihad.
Which is why it’s pointless to look at mosques as disconnected individual cases. ISLAM is at the core of every mosque and its what’s connecting them all into a single entity working towards the same goal it always has — world domination and total subjugation of all non-muslims.
Now, you may argue that mosques differ depending whether they are: actively recruiting and training terrorists, financing jihad terror groups, preaching hatred against infidels, disseminating anti-infidel propaganda, etc., compared to those that don’t. But it doesn’t matter. Just because a mosque lacks the financial means doesn’t mean it won’t jump at the first chance to do so.
TL;DR: THERE ARE NO PEACEFUL OR LESS THREATENING MOSQUES BECAUSE THEY ALL TEACH THE SAME ISLAM!
commonsense says
Amen.
Angemon says
So, part of the majority then…
Norger says
It really is a strange form of projection to claim that quoting the hateful content of authoritative Islamic sources verbatim is somehow “hate speech.” I just can’t wrap my head around that one.
UNCLE VLADDI says
This is ridiculous. The Qur’an is a crime manual, islam is the world’s largest and oldest ongoing crime and murder gang – every “muslim” is a terrorist even if they have committed no specific crimes beyond their general crime-gang membership, simply because they re-present the inherent violent threat islam presents.
All mosques are crime-gang club-houses, and so each represents the exact same criminal “threat level.”
AP says
The discussion is not necessary after 1400 years of terror, what do you need to know. A Leopard will not change his spot.
Wellington says
Not only are the authorities in Manchester, New Hampshire still asleep, but authorities all across America still are. Meanwhile, Islam yearly takes greater and greater advantage of American freedom for the purpose of destroying America.
If Islam could have its way in this country, this country will be dead. Islam, you know, is very good with death—death of the mind, death of the non-believer, death of freedom, death of equality under the law, death of women’s rights, et al.
Islam destroys everything it touches, just as Leftism does. No wonder Muslims and Leftists are allies—for now. If Islam gets its way though, it will then destroy the Left. Leftists remain clueless about this as they are about so much else.
Much danger ahead for America. Count on it.
Rollo Audio says
WHY ? Is this not stopped ?
gravenimage says
Thanks again, Mr. Gaubatz.