My latest in PJ Media:
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which is made up of 56 nations plus the Palestinian Authority, met Thursday in Jeddah and called for the adoption of an international law criminalizing criticism of Islam. But that kind of law could never be adopted in the United States, could it? Think again.
The OIC’s secretary-general, Dr. Yousef al-Othaimeen, called upon the nations of the world, both Muslim and non-Muslim, to crack down on speech that was “insulting religions or prophets.” It was clear, however, that al-Othaimeen couldn’t have cared less about speech insulting Christianity or Judaism or Hinduism or Buddhism or any of the revered figures of those religions. He cared only about criticism of Islam.
“There are laws against anti-Semitism and racism,” said al-Othaimeen. “So we request a law against mocking religions.” He didn’t explain why laws against racism should lead to laws against criticizing belief systems, since, after all, contrary to the assumptions of Rachel Dolezal, Shaun King, and Elizabeth Warren, one cannot change one’s race, but one can change one’s beliefs, including religious beliefs. Al-Othaimeen likely knows this, but cited racism because he knows how to pull the right strings to get the Western intelligentsia to do what he wants.
“Islamophobia,” he continued, “is a sentiment of excessive fear against Islam that is transformed into acts of intolerance and discriminations against Muslims and even violent crimes against people with Islamic attires.”
No one should discriminate against Muslims or anyone, and genuine intolerance, when it shades over into illegal activity, and violent crime should always be prosecuted. But the OIC wants to go much farther than that, and get Western societies to criminalize criticism of Islam altogether.
Al-Othaimeen added: “These issues are of great importance, to be worked on in collaboration not only with governments, but also with people and non-profit organizations, to prove to everyone that Islam is the voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence with Muslims and non-Muslims.”
Yes, everyone who remembers 9/11, and the Fort Hood jihad massacre, and the Boston Marathon bombings, and a host of other jihad attacks, all carried out in accord with Islamic teachings, knows all about Islam’s “voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence with Muslims and non-Muslims.”
But this muzzling of criticism of Islam could never happen in America, right? Wrong. In fact, this is a lot closer to happening than most people realize.
There is much more. Read the rest here.
Simon Platt says
Interesting photo – of a Socialist Workers’ Party front group, in Whitehall.
FYI says
That is no surprise.
It is that RED-GREEN AXIS as usual;the Lefties and the muslims.
The left are useful idiots to the islamic supremacists;the Lefties might like to consider what happens to lefties when muslims gain political power…
An islamic theocracy doesn’t tolerate anything except islam.
The hypocritical and corrupt Lefties and the muslims have a number of things in common:a shared hatred of Jews,contempt of christianity,endless and ferocious lying,an antidemocratic and antifreedom ideology{political for the lefties,religious for the muslims} ,pro-totalitarianism etc
Savvy Kafir says
I’m a Lefty, FYI. Or a progressive/libertarian mongrel of sorts. I’m pretty contemptuous of Christianity, and other faith-based religions. But I don’t hate Jews, and I admire & respect Israel (except for the ultra-religious nuts). I place a high value on honesty, and on democracy and personal freedoms such as free speech & gun rights. And I will fight the Islamization of the West as long as I’m drawing breath.
Not everyone on the political left is in cahoots with the Islamists, or willfully ignorant about Islam. There are a few of us who see Islam for what it is — the most toxic, retrograde ideology on the planet. There are a few of us who are willing to die fighting to help preserve Western civilization.
Political correctness is the problem, among the liberal public in general — and globalist insanity among many liberal politicians & bureaucrats. But some of us ACTUAL progressives despise political correctness, and properly appreciate the advantages & the greatness of Western civilization & Western culture. So don’t count all of us out.
FYI says
OK,Fair enough;really it is the Far Left I have problems with…
Frank Anderson says
FYI, is there a Near Left? What is there to negotiate or compromise between freedom and slavery, or life and death? “For everything a government does ‘for’ you it does other things ‘to’ you!”
FYI says
@Frank Anderson
I don’t know, but I’ll tell you something:There is…a FAR SIDE that I subscribe to{Gary Larson cartoons}and I have always been a Marxist{Groucho-}
Frank Anderson says
I don’t think Groucho or several other Marx family members advocate Communism.
gravenimage says
Frank, not all Liberals are Communists–far from it.
Frank Anderson says
GI, agreed. But how many Communists and similar totalitarians hide under progressive/liberal labels. “If it walks like a duck. . . .” Best wishes for an absolutely wonderful holiday.
gravenimage says
*Very* true, Frank.
gravenimage says
Thank for that information, Simon.
Frank Anderson says
This may be important: Article 6 Clause 2 of the United States Constitution says that treaties entered and ratified by the United States become the SUPREME LAW of the land. BHO and John Kerry signed the UN Small Arms Treaty which destroyed substantial parts of the Second Amendment. The treaty was never presented to Congress for ratification, because among other things it would never pass. BUT Obama treated it as law in spite of it never being ratified, until Trump withdrew signature. I do not know of a case (authority) where the Supreme Court has ruled whether specific Constitutional Rights can be taken away by ratification of a treaty. Nor do I know of one to the contrary. If the Constitution can be destroyed by a treaty signed by the President and ratified by Congress, with nothing more, we are in trouble.
Recall that the Treaty of London (1945) removed the defense of Superior Orders (The Nuremburg Rule) AFTER WWII was nearly over, covering war crimes that happened long before the adoption of the rule. This was almost certainly ex post facto, which is contrary to a provision of the United States Constitution prohibiting ex post facto laws. Somehow that conflict has been ignored or finessed. What other rights will be avoided?
gravenimage says
Scary stuff, thanks. Thanks for bringing your knowledge of the law to this issue. Appreciated.
Frank Anderson says
GI, this is like a case on a law school examination. Generally, Each course has one test per semester. In order to pass, both sides need to be argued, because in real life a lawyer rarely has the choice of the client; and in any event must be prepared to argue and answer both sides of the issue. I do not want to find out if the requirement of ratification of a Constitutional change by the states can be dodged by ratification of a treaty: WE might lose. The result of a one-party control of the White House and Congress could spell the end of the Constitution and horrible results to follow.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Frank.
Reziac says
For much of flyover country, a Rights-nullifying treaty could trigger secession (without troubling to ask permission of Congress or the several states). Not forgetting that most of the nation’s food and fuel comes therefrom.
Frank Anderson says
Obama destroyed the rights of SECURED creditors in favor of unsecured creditors, a taking of property without just compensation, with the “prepackaged” bankruptcy of General Motors. He destroyed for a time the Second Amendment by signing and imposing the Small Arms Treaty without bothering to have it ratified. Former presidential candidate and still member of Congress Eric Swalwell contemplated use of nuclear weapons against firearms owners. Democrats are using the power of Congress to define “high crimes and misdemeanors” to undo the election of DJT. And how about the many lies connected with Obamacare, “you can keep your doctor”, “you will save 2400 dollars per year” when the Constitutional right of association and contract was taken away? The Constitution means little or nothing when Democrats are in power.
Emilie Green says
“to prove to everyone that Islam is the voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence with Muslims and non-Muslims”
1400 years of Muslim behavior prove otherwise.
Frank Anderson says
+1
revereridesagain says
+2
abad says
+3
somehistory says
And that’s a fact! An abundance of evidence that proves your statement.
J D S says
Our elected officials have our freedoms in their hands….and they continue to do nothing about the Islam situation. is lam lives on the fact that they are classed along with other world religions….but what they call a religion IS NOT! And again our do called leaders turn a blind eye just because Islam calls itself a religion and the world seems to bribe it is and again IT IS NOT !..That is if one tries to compare is lam with other religions and THERE IS NO COMPARISON!And ZTHE WORLD STSNDS STILL!And SO DO OUR LEAD E RS!
Joe says
Yeah, about 200 million were killed when there was no active war. With mercy like that, who needs war?
Mark Swan says
The U.S.A. and other free Nations all need to disassociate
from the U.N. NOW.
The U.N. is dominated and controlled by our enemies—
they are directly involved in this Muslim infestation we
are witnessing all over Western Society—they continually
lobby for this, enable this, promote and protect this.
Much of this Western Social nonsense we are seeing today,
is the direct result of interference, by those who see our
ways as a hindrance to their perception of how they would
want things to be.
So we started and backed this U. N. hoping to bring some
influence upon the Nations away from war—that is pushed
aside here—other interests and other agendas are predominating
all the influence that consensus with goodwill could yield.
Taking a new approach to counter what our numerous enemies
expect, will mean disengaging from this particular organization
filled with them, de-legitimizing those who are out to change
our known ways, hurting the World by depriving it of what
most want—freedom to live and let live.
The U.N. is a catalyst for disrupting the free World—all those
who would use it as a conduit to work there agendas, would have
to completely reorganize, find other means that are not nearly so
well established and conducive to there efforts, with which they
are causing serious harm to the free World, up until now.
Any effort to change it from with-in would be futile—our
influence there is useless. We are vastly outnumbered by
enemies who can not be won-over—these left to their own
devices—will be infinitely less effective if we quit enabling
them through legitimizing them, and providing this means
for interacting with and manipulating our free societies.
If the U.S. A. were no longer associated with these Muslim
Countries who basically vote as one group—any claim by them,
of being part of some larger concern would be negated.
Can we find international cooperation—surely much more so,
if these determined enemies were disassociated from
the effort.
medforth says
Because she’s accused of being Islamophobic: Viennese students protest against German feminist Alice Schwarzer
The student body of the Vienna University of Applied Arts (hufak) protests against an invitation of the German journalist and feminist Alice Schwarzer.Schwarzer was invited by a dean to a panel discussion followed by a discussion on the 25th of November.In a statement, the student body explained in an initial statement that the founder and editor of the women’s magazine “Emma” was spreading her anti-Muslim racism “under the guise of feminism”. Schwarzer’s views would be “outdated and unacceptable”, according to the students. In addition, the hufak criticises an incident at the Goethe University in Frankfurt in May this year where there was a violent clash between the women’s rights activist and a Muslim protester,
On several videos you could see a woman with a headscarf yelling at Schwarzer that she should not touch her: “Don’t touch me! Otherwise I’ll report you to the police”, whereupon Schwarzer provocatively replies: “I thought only men were not allowed to touch you”.
The students of the Applied Arts University now demand from their university a “clear position against people who constantly express themselves in a racist, transphobic and sex-work hostile manner”.At the request of the newspaper HEUTE, the University of Applied Arts announced that it had already held a clarifying discussion with the student representatives. The criticism of the hufak was taken note of.However, it was clear from the outset that the lecture would not be cancelled under any circumstances, precisely because Schwarzer was controversial with some students.The university says: ” Debates are also important”.
More:
https://searchlight-germany.blogspot.com/2019/11/because-shes-accused-of-being.html
gravenimage says
So now taking issue with Muslims oppressing, abusing, raping, and murdering women is “racist”? What insanity. Thanks for that link, Medforth.
No Fear says
I wonder if the OIC would approve of a law which outlawed the criticism of paganism.
gravenimage says
Ha ha
Ren says
We should criminalize all those who want international law criminalizing criticism of islam because it is against democracy and freedom. Let them be in their own prison of thought.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
“There are laws against anti-Semitism and racism,” said al-Othaimeen. “So we request a law against mocking religions.”
…and then he continued, “and if you don’t agree we might have to kill you as our god commands.”
No, he didn’t say that but he might as well have because we all know what happens when muslims are offended for no good reason, people die and more freedoms are lost. Which is precisely why we should never outlaw criticism of islam, or any religion, really. History has shown there is no limit to the crimes and sins men will do to protect or advance their crazy delusions commonly known as “religion.” I would argue that even the best religions are of dubious value with their outrageous and unsubstantiated claims and all the pain such ill-founded beliefs are known to cause, but a religion like islam isn’t even worth the paper it’s printed on. Allah couldn’t possibly be the true god of the universe which means muhammad is a total fraud and therefore so are the most essential parts of their religion a fraud. I know allah isn’t the true Creator for the same reason I know an infant couldn’t have built the Eifell Tower, both are hopelessly unequal to the task. A morally retarded and bigoted god like allah who communicates his divine truths like a low IQ’d gang member couldn’t possible be the creator of this vast and glorious universe, just as I know an infant couldn’t have built that French architectural masterpiece. Such a god is not even as intelligent as an average human! and since I’m at least “average” I’m smart enough to know all this. The muslim god doesn’t even meet the basic expectations of even the most paltry of gods, since his words and actions in history show he wouldn’t even make a smart human being. Yet, muslims bow to this god, which says a lot about where they are at spiritually and intellectually.
“Islamophobia,” he continued, “is a sentiment of excessive fear against Islam that is transformed into acts of intolerance and discriminations against Muslims and even violent crimes against people with Islamic attires.” [bold mine]
I half wish that were true, then more muslims would know what it’s like for Christians, and Jews, and atheists, and Buddhists, and Hindus, and gays, and sexually mutilated young girls, and freedom lovers… who are abused for your bigoted and heartless “religion.” Just who in the hell do you think you are, you blind hypocritical and inept tyrant you, telling people of other nations they can’t be free to disagree with your retarded-mostly unsubstantiated-wildly assertive-violence causing-religion that’s not really even a religion, just a violent political agenda which pretends to be a religion that muslims refer to every time they get “offended” over some trivial matter like the burning of a book while ignoring the important issues like the murder and terror and bigotry that it causes (angry protracted sentence intended). It’s time you silly jackasses step off that super high pedestal you’ve been threatening from, cuz you are really, Really, REALLY getting on the world’s nerves.
Westman says
“..Islam is the voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence with Muslims and non-Muslims.”
Another one of those, “blow the coffee out of your nose”, moments. 🙂
Criminalizing criticism of religion won’t fly here in the US, because Muslims can’t stop demonizing Jews. Some obligatory canned Muslim prayers are even demeaning to Jews. They would have the ADL sending them to court, daily.
The US is very litigious and any such attempt to shield one religion or officially respect it over another would be constitutionally challenged, forthwith. Leftists want the Constitution changed because it gets in the way of their big PC ideas and access to our pockets.
abad says
That’s a given, the liberal elite does not respect the Constitution at all.
Seriously, I think they should all move to France if they don’t like it here in the USA.
Wellington says
First Amendment of the American Constitution versus Islam. The two are as mutually antagonistic to each other as it is possible to be.
Take your choice. I have and it was an extremely easy decision.
gravenimage says
Hear, hear, Wellington!
Westman says
Amen
abad says
+1
gravenimage says
It Can’t Happen Here? Muslim Organization Wants International Law Criminalizing Criticism of Islam
……………………..
Terrifying–and this is not the only attempt to impose Shari’ah ‘blasphemy’ laws here in the free West. Here is just one:
“Pakistan to raise Norway Qur’an burning at EU to push for international blasphemy laws”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/11/pakistan-to-raise-norway-quran-burning-at-eu-to-push-for-international-blasphemy-laws
somehistory says
For moslims, the only religion is islam…and therefore, it is only moslims and islam that would be protected from critique…or the telling of any truth regarding islam.
When h clinton was meeting with the oic, she said, “old-fashioned shaming,” could be used to guilt a person into not speaking about islam. And just look at all of the “shaming” over this subject that has happened since she promised the oic what she would do. Hardly a day goes by that someone is not accused of being “phobic” about islam. And many persons accused are just speaking the Truth, or expressing their feelings on the subject. And they are forced to apologize for any statements made, held up to ridicule, etc.
There there was the guy sent to prison for making a “vile video” that was not approved by “Americans,” according to clinton. She and ‘o’ made sure this guy was never heard from again…for making a video about islam’s fake prophet.
But, i omar says all kinds of “vile” things against the Jews…and people flock to protect her for saying them.
No such “shaming” happens when anyone says something negative about Christianity or Christians. No one is made to apologize even when what they say is untrue. It’s only islam and moslims who are protected in this way.
Jesus said His followers would be hated and persecuted…and this is happening worldwide…and hardly a peep about it in the news.
It can happen. And it was prophesied that the “wild beast, the false prophet, and the dragon (which is satan the devil),” would force the people of the whole world to “bow” to the beast and its image or face death for not worshipping this wild beast and its image.
(Revelation 13)
Lory says
Makes me want to draw a cartoon of Muhammad.
David Grisez says
In the United States of America criticism of Islam could become a crime if the Democrat Party has its way. We in the United States need to be careful about who we elect into government office. In order to protect the First Amendment we need a government of Conservative Republicans.
abad says
Agreed!
Vote Trump 2020.
Jayell says
“Muslim Organization Wants International Law Criminalizing Criticism of Islam”
This is the sort of thing that the Nazis and Fascists were up to, and totalitarian communist regimes from Soviet times to the present day. If Hitler & chums and the Communist Bloc had been successful in their world-domination plans, we’d be have had all free speech and criticism f their various status quos stifled on a global basis in exactly the same way as these muslims are proposing. This is also the sort of thing that the Beijing Government are up to now, with people disappearing for ‘re-education’ (or whatever) not only on the Chinese mainland but also from Hong Kong.This is also the sort of thing that’s happening in Europe with the muslim lobby getting their hands on the puppet-strings and pushing their specious ‘islamophobia’ agenda to kill any opposition to their domination plans, with Khan’s spurious ‘anti hate-speech’ campaign in London. backed by his ‘secret police’, rivalling anything that Beijing have in mind in their own neck of the woods. We now have tons of evidence in the West showing at first hand precisely what islam is all about, yet this ludicrous islamomanic propaganda gets pushed left, right and centre and people continue to parrot the fatuously-contrived politically-correct mantras as the evidence to the contrary stares them in the face – assuming they’re still alive and in one piece to observe it. Quite simply, this hideous corruption has got to stop, and the longer it’s allowed to rot our societies, the less ‘civilised’ the corrective measures will have to be.
Reziac says
For anyone who missed the link from Clarion this morning:
https://www.docdroid.net/file/download/DtiLYBH/bender-affidavit.pdf
Basically, Qatar has infiltrated from top to bottom, and Ilhan Omar (among many others) is a Qatar asset. Info on her starts about p60, but the whole document is …enlightening. According to the deposition, all our major news outlets are controlled and compromised.
TL;DR: If we don’t Remove Kebab before Trump leaves office… we’re doomed.
Scott Carlson says
That would be Sharia Law. It is against Sharia Law to disagree with Islam, Mohammad and anything having to do with Islam.
If this implemented, consider yourself under Sharia Law. This is exactly how Sharia Law sneaks in. After that it’s all down hill.
Merri-joy says
Bring it on! “to crack down on speech that was “insulting religions or prophets.”
JUDAISM & CHRISTIANITY both were well established Religions / FAITHS centuries before ISLAM – both have PROPHETS!
Therefore Muslim’s cannot insult JESUS CHRIST or CHRISTIANS = CHRISTONES!
The law won’t apply to Islam and Muslim’s because there’s is a Political Ideology according to Islam’s own leaders!
notnolib says
Is “pointing out” considered to be insulting? For example, if I were to point out (not insult…..point out) that islam is a gutter cult invented by a pedophilic madman named mohammed the pig-faced dog, could I be charged with a crime? For just “pointing out” facts?
Frank Anderson says
notnolib, I think you can see what is going on right now in Congress. Democrats are showing that with their House majority they can define “high crimes and misdemeanors” as anything they wish, to complete their part of impeachment they have desired and preached since the day the election results were announced. There are many examples that have appeared here on JW that just quoting or telling the truth is blasphemy to islam, punishable by death. Like “high crimes and misdemeanors” blasphemy is anything someone wants to call blasphemy, nothing more. Suppression of free speech and criticism is the rule among groups who cannot stand examination. Look at what happened when anyone dared speak the truth about Nazis in Germany, or Communists in the Soviet Union, China or North Korea, for examples. There is a problem: Free Speech is often used as a weapon to destroy the right and ability of free speech. The Constitution was drafted and adopted by highly principled and educated people expecting to be followed by similar worthy people. Instead, mob rule by mindless corrupt evil is in charge today. Open borders that floods the country with voters who have no background in US values will guarantee the continued mob rule, if we allow it.
Mark Swan says
Absolutely Frank Anderson.
abad says
+1
gravenimage says
Yes–scary, Frank.
Frank Anderson says
GI, it takes “scary” to get people off their couches and move. How many times have you seen me write about Viktor Frankl’s “delusion of reprieve”? The inmates of the death camps were rightfully terrified of the circumstances to a large extent not their doing, over which they had no control, and few real prospects of rescue. So they used delusions to survive another day in preference to committing suicide by simply stepping across a wire about 10 feet from the camp fence to be shot dead immediately. We have much more control over our prospects. We can make a difference in the outcome we see and which others suffer. It will take people getting scared and angry in order to provoke effective action. Evil must not be allowed to win.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Frank.
I’ve actually talked to well-educated Americans who say that they aren’t scared of terrorism because nothing has happened here since 9/11–they actually think this is true. This is what willful ignorance leads to.
Frank Anderson says
GI, How many people do you imagine take their lead from these willfully ignorant people? Do you see what I see this being a repeat of history? How many of the half of Germany’s Jews listened to bad counsel and remained complacent? I have videos of several Survivors talking about this. They were there and somehow survived. I was not, and cannot to this day explain either their experience or what I observe today.
Or Else! says
“There are laws against anti-Semitism and racism,” said al-Othaimeen. “So we request a law against mocking religions.”
——————————-
Islam says its prophet and texts are perfect and unalterable. Among other horrors, Islamic texts contain anti-Semitism, racism/supremacism, and the mockery/condemnation of other religions.
You first, Islam. You first.
Mike says
Then I suppose every one of those imams who slam Christians and Jews are on their way to prison!
gravenimage says
It never works that way…
OLD GUY says
Christians and Jews will have to fight islam-muslims again. The longer we wait the worse it will be. We have been empowering their bad behavior through our political position and the world demand for oil. The money has given islam the access to power within their leadership. Power and greed corrupts everything.
tim gallagher says
I suppose it is no surprise that Muslims would try to prevent their vile, murderous religion from copping the criticism it deserves. It would be insanity if the non-Muslims of the world ( Islam’s victims over and over again) went along with this garbage. I look at the reports here on Jihad watch today, in the Netherlands, Muslims plot a jihad massacre, in Nigeria, four more Christians murdered by Muslims, in India, Muslims plot a jihad massacre, and the idea that this revoltingly evil ideology, Islam, should not be criticised sickens me. The truth always needs to be told and that means that islam needs to be criticised constantly as the malignant force it is in our world. Robert Spencer and the others here at Jihad Watch do a great job trying to get the truth out to people. However, knowing how our left wingers think ( and how large their numbers are in our societies) and how they seem to want to suck up to Islam and hate our western values, there’s probably a chance that this garbage will actually be accepted one day.
Sheyenne says
TO NOT BE INTIMIDATED EVER BY THIS ISLAM SCUM
THE ISLAMOPHOBE TERM WAS CREATED BY IIIT THINK TANK, OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD
SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF BEATING DOWN CRITICS; THE TERM WAS DESIGNED AS A WEAPON TO ADVANCE A TOTALITARIAN CAUSE BY STIGMATIZING CRITICS AND SILENCING THEM.
TO HELL WITH THAT CRAP; FIGHT BACK
WAKE UP FOLKS
SURA1 KORAN
“GUIDE US TO THE STRAIGHT PATH, THE PATH OF THOSE WHOM YOU HAVE BESTOWED FAVOR
(MUSLIMS) AND NOT OF THOSE WHO HAVE EVOKED YOUR ANGER (JEWS) AND THOSE WHO HAVE GONE ASTRAY (CHRISTIANS).
THAT TELLS IT ALL
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
+1, Nicely said.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
That’s for Tim Gallagher’s comment, 2nd above. My replies to other’s comments have been landing in the wrong place, weird. I do know how to reply, but apparently that doesn’t matter, lately.
tim gallagher says
Thanks, Agostino, for the reply to my comment. It is unbelievable that Muslims expect that they can carry out all this barbaric evil and then demand that they get no criticism for all that evil. Evil has to be criticised.
Frank Anderson says
T.G. with sincere courtesy and respect, they have been teaching and doing the same for 1499 years. Why would they change? After all their “word” is “final, perfect, complete and unchangeable”.
tim gallagher says
No doubt about it, Frank. Thanks for the comment. And, as you say, since they think that their vile, evil and barbaric ideology is the final and perfect revelation from god, there is no hope that they’ll change. And I’m guessing not all that many Muslims are going to wake up and pack up and leave islam. The thing that matters is, who’s going to win this 1400 year long war between this revolting ideology, Islam, and our more civilised way of living life? I certainly hope that Islam is eventually smashed. The idea that islam could win is sickening, (the darkest of dark ages) although we’ll all be long gone by then. I do get very annoyed by these attempts by Muslims (as mentioned in this report) to shut down criticism of their revolting ideology and all the disgusting behaviours that that ideology endorses. If anything deserves criticism it is Islam.
OLD GUY says
YES to FREEDOM of SPEACH!!!
OLD GUY says
YES to FREEDOM of SPEACH!!!!
TKF says
Criminalize this….Islam sucks! Mohammad sucks! If Allah actually existed he would also suck! Muslims can go straight to hell where they belong so they can be with their crazy phony baloney prophet.
Frank Anderson says
TKF, if you look at the general definition under US federal law, which does not apply in Canada, a criminal conspiracy is 1) an agreement, 2) for an unlawful purpose or to use unlawful means for an otherwise lawful purpose, 3) between 2 or more persons, legal or natural, 4) any overt act by ANY one or more participants in furtherance of the conspiracy. There is no time limit. There is no upper limit on the number of participants. It is not required that each join at the beginning, or know all the details. If that does not describe islam what does, with between 250 and 1000 million murders to its toll of conquest in 1400 year, etc. Now find a prosecutor who will present the case and a judge who will hear it. I wonder how Canada’s conspiracy law compares?
hannahlu52 says
Look at the UK. Someone went undercover, managed to get the truth of how the ideology operates:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WgVa3VRFb4
It is VERY dangerous – it is cunningly deceptive.
Frank Anderson says
Hannah, they have had 1400 years to get it right. “Final, Perfect, Complete, Unchangeable.” “Convert, Submit to slavery and humiliation, or Die.” These are not our friends. Spencer’s Politically Correct Guide to Islam, Warner’s Abridged Koran, Gabriel’s Unfinished Battle, and dozens or hundreds of other books make going “undercover” unnecessary.
Frank Anderson says
Correction Please. Robert Spencer’s book, which I suggest to be among the first to read for its organization and brevity, is Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam.