This is a lot closer to happening than most people realize. In October 2009, the Obama administration joined Egypt in supporting a resolution in the UN’s Human Rights Council to recognize exceptions to the freedom of speech for “any negative racial and religious stereotyping” (a highly subjective category). Approved by the U.N. Human Rights Council, the resolution called on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.” Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton affirmed the Obama administration’s support for this on July 15, 2011, when she gave an address on the freedom of speech at an Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) conference on Combating Religious Intolerance. “Together, she said, “we have begun to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression and we are pursuing a new approach. These are fundamental freedoms that belong to all people in all places and they are certainly essential to democracy.”
But how could both religious sensitivities and freedom of expression be protected?
Clinton had a First Amendment to deal with, and so in place of legal restrictions on criminalization of Islam, she suggested “old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” She held a lengthy closed-door meeting with OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu in December 2011 to facilitate the adoption of measures that would advance the OIC’s anti-free speech campaign. But what agreements she and Ihsanoglu made, if any, have never been disclosed. Still, the specter of an American secretary of State conferring with a foreign official about how to restrict the freedom of speech in order to stifle communications deemed offensive to Muslims was, at the very least, chilling.
Nor was that a singular case. In July 2012, Thomas Perez — then the assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, was asked by Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ):
Will you tell us here today that this administration’s Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?
Perez could have simply answered yes, and maybe even cited the First Amendment. Instead, Perez refused to answer the question directly. Franks persisted, ultimately asking it four times. Perez at one point responded that it was a “hard question.” He simply refused to affirm that the Obama Justice Department would not attempt to criminalize criticism of Islam.
This is today’s Democratic Party. If a Democrat wins the presidency in 2020 or thereafter, will that President advance the Left’s assault on the freedom of speech and move to implement Sharia restrictions on criticism of Islam in the United States? You can bet on it. In that eventuality, I hope some of y’all will visit me in prison.
“OIC chief demands international law to criminalize Islamophobia,” by Mohammed al-Kinani, Arab News, November 21, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
JEDDAH: Muslim leaders on Thursday demanded the introduction of an international law to criminalize all acts of Islamophobia.
Announcing plans for the celebration of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) 50th anniversary in Jeddah on Monday, its secretary-general called for a global crackdown on individuals or groups responsible for “insulting religions or prophets.”
Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen told Arab News: “There are laws against anti-Semitism and racism. So, we request a law against mocking religions.”
In a report released by the OIC, he said that modernization and the Internet revolution had turned the world into a “global village” where religions and cultures should coexist, and races and nations must live side by side as neighbors.
“Islamophobia is a sentiment of excessive fear against Islam that is transformed into acts of intolerance and discriminations against Muslims and even violent crimes against people with Islamic attires.”…
On Islamophobia, Al-Othaimeen said that the behaviors of some Muslims who did not truly represent Islam, had brought prejudice to the surface….
“These issues are of great importance, to be worked on in collaboration not only with governments, but also with people and non-profit organizations, to prove to everyone that Islam is the voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence with Muslims and non-Muslims,” he added.
Yeah, sure, that’s the ticket.
Steve says
Yo bro I want all the Muslims in the U.S. to tell me I don’t have free speech. Bring it on Bro. I have fought in three wars and my father and younger brother paid the ultimate price. So please bring it on. I welcome it. You Muslims will learn what the redcoats did…the hard way.
Savvy Kafir says
I like your sentiment! We should not give an inch to these savages.
mzaz says
GOD BLESS YOU AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. My thanks to all our warriors and vets. My dad and uncles fought in WW2. They were first generation American born. My cousins fought Korean and Vietnam. I now have a grandson in the Marines two years now. GOD BLESS AMERICA
mortimer says
OIC wants to curtail the freedom of speech as a means of imposing Islamic blasphemy laws.
This is the IMPOSITION of Sharia law by SECULAR MEANS.
Jeff Gonez says
I wonder how long it will be before they do bring it on?
Jule Bacal says
But if this were to happen, the Qur’an/Haiths would become criminalized. Mosques might have nothing to preach. Don’t these guys even realise? No Supremacist group can practice in USA.
Angemon says
One of those is not like the other… Mocking something is not the same as being anti-something or “racist”…
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
It doesn’t matter. No modern state should have enforced blasphemy laws on its books.
Right now the Western world is full of fools who think that politeness can and should be legislated. They haven’t the forethought to see that such an endeavor will end in tyranny.
Mock, berate, ridicule, belittle, criticism constructive or not, rant racist or otherwise.The antidote to these is rational debate, not police action!
(And as we all here know, the Muslims have no counter to rational debate.)
FYI says
An islamic “debate”..tends to go something like this..
“wahwahwah oh you don’t speak Arabic..you couldn’t possibly understand the koran’s advanced classical Arabic …….you have a big nose…haha….. we won the debate”
allah rightly guides his muslims in the palms of his TWO RIGHT HANDS
{Sahih muslim 1827}doesn’t he?
At the dawa booth…
infidel:it says here in this koranic verse that a man can beat his wife..
dawa guy: haha!no no that’s not what that verse means ;you don’t know Arabic
Ex-muslim “apostate” who speaks Arabic: no,that verb means to beat;it is quite clear what that means.The koran permits beating women…
dawa guy:DAMMIT!Oh no!An Educated Arabic speaker who knows the errors in the koran..and speaks better Arabic than i do…allah save me!
And he’s an “apostate”…..
Donovan Nuera says
Exactly!!!
…and buy all of your liberal friends a koooran for Christmas…..then quiz them a month later to see if they even read it.
Infidel says
The thing about the ‘You don’t Arabic’ argument is that only half a billion of Muslims, AT MOST, are Arabic speaking. The 4 countries that together provide the bulk of all Muslims – Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia and India – their Muslims don’t speak Arabic. Neither do Muslims in Iran, Turkic countries or some West African Muslim countries, such as Gambia. So wtf are they doing being Muslim if they don’t speak Arabic?
This if one doesn’t wanna use the argument that most Catholics neither know Latin, most Buddhists don’t know Pali and most Hindus don’t know Sanskrit, but that languages are translatable
mortimer says
Response to Flavius: A blasphemy law can only be enforced if there is an official, ESTABLISHED STATE RELIGION that is DEFINED by a special BODY OF EXPERTS who define ‘blasphemy’ for the law enforcement and judiciary.
– The Irish Law Reform Commission’s 1991 Report opined that “there is no place for the offence of blasphemous libel in a society which respects freedom of speech.”
It refused to allow the prosecution, stating “in the absence of any legislative definition of the constitutional offence of blasphemy, it is impossible to say of what the offence of blasphemy consists … In the absence of legislation and in the present uncertain state of the law the Court could not see its way to authorising the institution of a criminal prosecution”.
Since there are 4,200 different religions, how can there be an enforcement banning criticism of ALL 4,200 equally?
That would require huge numbers of police monitoring all universities and seminaries and internet chat rooms.
Jule Bacal says
How many times have we heard Omar say ‘criticism of israel is not antisemitism’.Tell her criticism of Islam or the Muslim way of life is not islamophobia either
pennant8 says
Most Americans have never heard of the OIC, or for that matter, the Muslim Brotherhood. Both of these groups can do more damage to America as we know it than ISIS, al Qaeda and all the other alphabet soup jihadist groups put together.
Ole Pederson says
I used to laugh at the idea put forward by some, that Obama was the first muslim president.
Go figure …
mzaz says
His name ran chills up and down my spine. I didn’t think people would vote for someone with a muslim name. Especially acter 9/11. Surprised me. The idiots didn’t vote once but twice now we have them in Congress. We are destroying our own country from within. This is not the country I grew up in the 50s.
Quazgaa says
I use to call him the sunni christian president.
No true christian would defend islam
Quazgaa says
‘used to’, sorry
Infidel says
That’s a great term, given the ‘God damn America’ that his pastor Jeremiah Wright read in the ‘Bible’. There is no arguing that when he went to school in Indonesia, he was a real Muslim, but when he attended Wright’s congregation, he was a fake Christian.
Jule Bacal says
Islam says any one born of a Muslim father is automatically Muslim.I think he did not know what that really meant or what Islam is, like most Americans or non Muslims. It could be he just thought it was a belief in one god called Allah similar to what Abraham taught, and not that it is a whole lot more or that Allah was Warlord. I have heard many Muslims say EVERYONE is born Muslim but only get sidetracked by cultures, parents, other religions which are pagan or fake. There is an excuse for everything. There is no chance of discussing with a Muslim.
PRCS says
Muslim leaders on Thursday demanded the introduction of an international law to criminalize all acts of Islamophobia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVSRm80WzZk
Lydia Church says
“Voice of mercy”???
That would be Christianity.
islam is the voice of brutality.
Yup, these things are encroaching.
The end is here.
And I will never accept anyone in the name of coexistence, in the way that they want us to, which includes accepting their beliefs. Their beliefs are invalid. I will continue to criticize islam as a false religion. I will be a Christian till the day I die, including if it is the cause of my death. For not acknowledging their false religion, they will accuse us of being ‘haters’ ‘intolerant’ and non inclusive, etc. and will put us in jail and/or other persecutions. They will criminalize the truth. They will come after those of us bold and brave enough to proclaim it anyway. Some of us are that bold, because we love the Lord that much. If you don’t, you will cave and it is inevitable. You follow loyally and die for what you love most.
“In that eventuality, I hope some of y’all will visit me in prison.”
***** Robert, I might land in jail before you do, and if not, I’ll be a close second place. We can visit each other and all the other true defenders of the faith at that time.
: )
And if it is solitary confinement I will keep praying for all of us and praising and worshiping God as the early Christians did in prison.
There is a story about the time of the holocaust involving the pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer. He was in prison for opposing the nazi party and its doings. He was also martyred there. One fellow minister visited him in prison and asked him, “Dietrich, what are you doing in jail?” To this, Dietrich replied, “Friend, what are you doing OUT of jail?!”
*Dietrich wrote the book: The Cost of Discipleship. And he did it. I don’t know everything about him but I know about that. He and Niemoller were some of the foremost opponents during the nazi reich.
It is an honor to be persecuted for righteousness sake, as Jesus said!
Jule Bacal says
A problem is that they are taught the same loyalty about Islam. This is how they are, as ‘Believers’….Only they are more determined to conquer every other Belief and Dominate with that ferver.
(No one can deny Jesus was a much, much better model for others…except people who never read about him. How many people did Jesus kill? How many people did Jesus stone? How many gays did he throw off high buildings to their death? Even when he rampaged merchants who were using a synagogue as a market for profit, he did not hit anyone. He said his sword of Truth was his only weapon. Truth far greater than anything Mohammed and his warlords said. But Muslims are taught to Believe that rot without thinking. And they are taught to believe mans thinking is so flawed that they must only take the Qur’an of Allahs words (written by warlords) as the only real truth, however strange it may sound. So they are all Muslim soldiers for Islam. If they stop believing they feel satan has them. So there is no talking to them or hoping they will integrate and become tolerant of Hindu, Buddhist, Jains, Jews, Christians….because mohammed came After any other profits, improving the message for everyone (the warlords trick to build with homegrown s an empire or caliphate like Rome in the old days but with homegrown soldiers of all members…not just soldiers who kill but proselytise, take over education and get into politics ) and they say Mohammed’s Qur’an is the LAST interpretation of Abraham their way, the only. So what are we to do? Domination by Supremacists is something no American can accept.
Niemoller says
If there were any logical consistency at the UN, they would of course need to ban Islam for demonizing and physically threatening members of other religions, including, by name, members of Judaism, Christianity and Zoroastrianism.
revereridesagain says
Of course they would. There is no logic involved here. It is a power play by Islam to silence all criticism and further enable its campaign of conquest. But no religious ideology is any more worthy of claiming the “protection” of censorship than is any other form of conviction. Every adult is responsible for what he or she chooses to believe, and ever human being has the right — not granted to us a boon from some supernatural being but because our rational faculty is how we survive and thrive in our world specifically as humans, and we have the natural right to not have that faculty interfered with by violence. If that offends anyone, that’s your business, not mine to grovel before your “superior beliefs” and hide my own. Certainly not before a mess of primitive nonsense such as Islam, a blind faith which cut its last ties to reason in the 11th century and has never even tried to restore them.
Jule Bacal says
EXACTLY!
Westman says
OIC: “..modernization and the Internet revolution had turned the world into a “global village” where religions and cultures should coexist..”
No, it put the Islamic world, and its jihad, on full display and made Islam aware of how far it had fallen behind the West. Where we once saw hippies joining this strange benign(we thought) religion in the 1960’s, we now clearly see a political/militaristic, cancerous, parasitic, entity having designs to force the entire world into submission.
Sorry, OIC, that BS isn’t going to fly in the US. We have observed the European Canary getting sick from Islam’s fumes. We can be friends with Muslims who won’t conform to the Quran’s demands to hate us, yet, realize that Islam’s ideology, itself, is a stinking danger to all of humanity.
Quazgaa says
A muslim who realizes the qur’an is just glorified toilet paper and won’t follow its teachings and yet is still a muslim, is a muslim on the fence.
Are you sure we need such friends?
mzaz says
Islam is NOT a religion. It was founded by a murdering pedophile who raped little girls. FUCC ISLAM
mortimer says
Disagree with mzaz. Islam is the religion of brutality, of intolerance, of slavery and of sado-masochism.
Furthermore, Islam has all the characteristics of a CULT. In fact, Islam is 22 cults in one:
-a death cult, a rape cult, an honor-killing cult, an extortion cult, a plunder cult, a censorship cult, a misogyny cult, a lie cult, a pedophilia cult, a sadomasochistic cult, an obsessive-compulsive cult, a supremacism cult, a Jew hatred cult, a Christianophobia cult, a male chauvinist cult, an inbreeding cult, an obscurantism cult, a superstition cult, a personality cult, a cruelty to animals cult, a group-think cult, a suicide cult.
Wow! Where do we sign up? (sarc/off)
gravenimage says
Islam is a religion–it is an evil religion.
Thomas Richard says
Throw the UN out of the USA and Canada…..Take our countries back…….
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Imposition of international laws dictated by the UN is the reason we are seeing all this panic around “the end of the world due to climate change.” If they can get you to panic out of fear for your life and submit to draconian rules, laws, taxation and ruler-ship then they have you.
The science behind man-made climate change has, from the very start, been a fraud. That science is based on an appeal to authority and nothing else. It is a well thought-out ruse. The first IPCC report was a contradiction. All the two thousand to 2,500 scientists who signup for the detailed report were hoping to get funding. They all agreed that, they didn’t know if there was man-made climate change or not, and that there needed to be more research. The IPCC Summary report, which was a policy document, lied and reported that all those scientists agreed that man-made climate change was a reality! (When these scientists realized that they had been used, most abandoned or attempted to abandon the process.)
Again, the real purpose of this ruse is to get free people to surrender their autonomy to an international government and pay taxes to that international government. The OIC, being the largest voting block in the UN, is all on-board with creating this world government. And the first item on their agenda is the implementation and enforcement of an international Islamic blasphemy law.
No modern state should have enforced blasphemy laws on its books. NONE!
Wellington says
Obama when President supported UN Resolution 16/18, which effectively criminalized criticism of religion (with Islam being the religion in mind, never mind Islam’s many heinous criticisms and actions against other religions) and which went DIRECTLY against the freedom of speech provision of the First Amendment to the American Constitution, a constitution Obama swore to uphold.
He did not. Shame on Obama for this for all time. And any voters for Obama out there who still want to defend this rot, if indeed they knew about it in the first place? Yeah, go ahead, tell me how Obama was correct and the First Amendment wrong.
Save Europe says
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cWEza4ghNNg
Wellington says
Making it all the worse is in that clip Obama talks about slandering Mohammed. As a lawyer he should know you can’t slander or libel a dead person. But then he did graduate from Harvard Law School and, as I have written before, many lawyers, including me, know that Ivy League lawyers are, as a whole, the worst lawyers out there. They’re arrogant, feel entitled, look down upon lawyers who graduated from a law school like Pitt or Ohio State and they are incompetent.
mortimer says
How can countries defend all 4,200 legal religions from being criticized??? And in all countries???
No one would ever again be able to speak about religion at all !!! Muslims would also be UNABLE to discuss any religion … even Islam, since there is a HUGE amount of hatred against people of other faiths in the Koran, hadiths, Sira and canonical Islamic commentaries!
Over 60% of Islamic texts would be CENSORED!
Jule Bacal says
If people had been allowed to question or criticise Islam or Mohammed, there would be no religious gang…..just a gang. Thats why they put that passage in the Qur’an that regular people cannot know more than Allah and Allah is who wrote their book. Allah is the leader of their Gang. So however outrageous it might seem to them at times, it is what Allah says & Allah is LAW. Those people are not allowed to think outside their box without fear of punishment by peers, family, government and Allah after death. The ones who do, in a free country, are extraordinary and should be protected & reassured no Allah will punish after birth. Even though the mind knows, a tiny fear remains if they were brought up with it. FEAR of Allah is what the religious force is of the Gang.
somehistory says
They say “religion” but they mean islam, and only islam. To the moslim mind, islam is the only religion. The only religion they are speaking about is islam.
In 2011, this same oic group of creepy moslims met with h. clinton to get her on board for the criminalization of any critique of ‘religion’…islam…and she agreed to help, but informed them of the U.S. guarantee of “free speech,” that would prevent it being made a crime. She said she, and others, could “shame” Americans into compliance.
Recall her little speech about the video that was published…by the guy who was sent to prison for publishing it…and how “vile” she said it was? That was in 2012…not long after she promised to “shame” us into compliance…not to criticize (hint: tell the Truth)…with their desire for no one to acknowledge anything bad about islam or moslims.
The line “Islam is the voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence ” is such a big, fat, nasty, evil lie that it had to come directly from satan through his spokeshuman. (the guy is not a man..just male.)
George says
mercy does not exist in islam; foreign lady recently beheaded in saudia arabia; sickening; all these large men jerks positioning this tiny lady to be beheaded; the most sickening thing ever; what the hell could she have done to be treated like that? those arab ragheads need a wake up call; first, castrate every one of them without anesthetic; then let them have their 77 virgins.
Jule Bacal says
Good point. Religion has a different meaning to them as does Peace or Tolerance (only if in submission to Islams rule) or even Allah.The whole thing means different to them but if one reads all their books, one can see.
ntesdorf says
‘to prove to everyone that Islam is the voice of mercy, moderation and coexistence with Muslims and non-Muslims,”. Now that’s your problem right there. Simply reading the Qu’ran, Haddith and Sunna of Mohammed shows that this is great nonsense.
Jule Bacal says
Its so clear. So WHY don’t more people know?Why defend something they do not know? Why doesn’t our CIA or even Homeland BRIEF people or make it obligatory to read their stuff and listen to so many clerics, Imams, etc, translated from Arabic to their people into english. Why is all this so HIDDEN?
Sweden said something like ‘we heard Muslims would be offended and riot, so we won’t allow’ whatever it was like a music group or lecture. Is that the Reason? Fear of riots? Fear of Wars? But thats exactly the way Islam wants it…Fear. Or is it money made from Muslim countries?
underbed cat says
International law by whom? 57 Islamic countries trying to overpower the world.? By perfecting the art of deceit? By using terror to convert the unwilling.? They might be able to sell that to Hollywood or the Press but don’t for a minute think nobody is aware, our tolerance has been misinterpreted, besides the information is already out, if there is an error in presentation, since the offense of language could not be supported as Quran is reference. The OIC countries have practiced jihad and turned themselves into victims by omission, maps have a timeframe of warfare since ten or twenty years after inception, the records are indefensible for American Constitutional Law, unless like a FISA warrant is signed without verification, most of the OIC facts are in the eyes of sharia law, that is not the law of the land and especially when weapons are found in the mosque the same place of the legal rulings a redefinition is needed.
Dajjal says
ICERD : by a binding codecil to be coded by the Ad Hoc Committee On Elaboration Of Complementary Standards. It meets twice a yearjm abd kast tune U kiijedm was deadkicjed, Good luck finding any information outside my old blog posts about it.
Dajjal says
Sorry, fingers slipped. It meets twice a year and, last time I looked, was deadlocked.
Tony Naim says
That will only happen when the OIC will outlaw
Violence in Islam, that means when they will abolish all violent verses in the Koran!
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
The OIC report says that Islamophobia is “a sentiment of excessive fear against Islam …”. What examples does it list of non-excessive fear against Islam?
Ed Lee says
Stop talking. It is useless. Get armed. Get proficient. Those of us who recognize the threat will soon be fighting on our doorsteps for our lives and our way of life. We will get no support from our government, whether local, state, or federal. Muslims claim to love death more than we love life. I can help them out with that.
Wellington says
“Stop talking. It is useless.”
Disagree. Just reflect how many people who didn’t have a negative view of Islam twenty, fifteen or even five years ago but who do now due to the printed or written word.
Understand, I’m not against action (within the law), but don’t underestimate the power of speech. It is a motivator of the first order too. Think, as examples, the Declaration of Independence and The Federalist Papers. Jihad Watch also.
Ed Lee says
Is anybody important listening? The President, members of Congress, business leaders who control 80% of the money in the world? When the fertilizer hits the ventilator, we will be on our own. The only support we may get will be from a few local cops who agree with us. Officially, we will be racist, bigoted Islamophobes who need to be eliminated. Right now, the politics is all Kabuki Theater, and we’re all expected to become zombies while binge watch reality TV, or CNN.
Wellington says
I consider the Democrats hopeless on Islam (hopeless on virtually everything) but while many Republicans continue in willful ignorance of Islam, many do not. Don’t forget that Republicans in state legislatures like those of Oklahoma and Tennessee passed laws or resolutions that disallowed Sharia from being implemented wherever it violated American law. Trump himself said in March of 2016 while still a candidate, and I quote, “I think Islam hates us.” Newt Gingrich, though retired from politics, has often pointed out the dangers inherent in Islamic law. And so on.
Yes, much remains to be done and most of the elites in the media, academia and the political realm persist in ignoring what a threat Islam is to liberty and equality under the law (fine pork products and alcohol too), but I’m sometimes encouraged by the fact that more and more people are learning about Islam and how awful it is. I see the glass one third full instead of two thirds empty. Twenty years ago it was pretty much just empty.
Save Europe says
Dr. Yousef Al-Othaimeen told Arab News: “There are laws against anti-Semitism and racism. So, we request a law against mocking religions.”
YOU ARE NOT A RACE OF PEOPLE!!!
You are the New Nazis, however!!!!!
Ren says
We demand a law that condemns islam.
George says
oh,they want to criminalize a term THEY created? What a bunch of horny old men jerks who should have done to them what they have done to women under islam. how damned stupid can they be???? Freedom of speech exists for a reason.
ploome says
David Littman, who was husband to Bat Y’eor wrote about this many years ago….
https://www.dhimmitude.org/littman-biography.html
gravenimage says
+1
mortimer says
Why does only ONE RELIGION out of 4,200 DIFFERENT RELIGIONS have SPECIAL PRIVILEGES that the other 4,199 religions do NOT have ???
What SPECIAL PLEADING allows Islam to be FREE FROM CRITICISM ???
(DESCRIPTION OF “SPECIAL PLEADING” … To apply standards, principles, and/or rules to OTHER people or circumstances, while making oneself or certain circumstances EXEMPT from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification. Special pleading is often a result of strong emotional beliefs that interfere with reason.
Example: Muslims say OTHERS may not criticize Islam, but that ISLAMIC APOLOGISTS may without ANY HINDRANCE CRITICIZE and CONDEMN ALL other religions.
In other words, it isn’t UNFAIR to criticize religion WHEN MUSLIMS DO IT.
mortimer says
3 EXAMPLES OF “SPECIAL PLEADING”
Example #1: Yes, I do think that ALL drunk drivers should go to prison, but Your Honor, he is MY SON! He is a good boy who just made a mistake!
Example #2: Superstition is a belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance, or a false conception of causation — UNLESS it is ASTROLOGY.
Example #3: It is alright for Prof. Dawkins and Bill Maher to criticize and mock Christianity, but Islam is a SPECIAL CASE and it is RACIST when Dawkins criticizes Islam.
E T says
The Jamaat-e-Islami Party/ Muslim Brotherhood hoods state: Non-Muslims have absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s Earth nor direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines. If they do, the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.
E T says
OIC, Muslim Brotherhood hoods, Muslim politicians all need to be outlawed in the West.
E T says
Just say NO to Islam, or go to the hellfires barbarians.
E T says
Sheikh Ahmed Badran said. “ONCE MUSLIMS COME TO POWER THEY WILL NEVER ALLOW INFIDELS TO RULE OVER MUSLIMS.” That sounds like Christianophobia and hate speech.
E T says
Imam Sirai Wahhabism, SR. Once said ”I swear by God, I swear by God, the American Government is controlled by Shaitan (the devil)……no doubt about it.” He was brought in to speak at the Interfaith training by the Arizona Muslims Alliance, to deliver a sermon to children.
E t says
Imam Siraj Wahhaji
E T says
Ever hear the song “Hit the road Jack and don’t cha come back no more”?
Walter Sieruk says
The terrible gall the Muslim chief of OIC have to even attempted to force international law to conform to their Islamic “values.” That the head of OIC make demands that international law criminalize any criticism of Islam is further proof that Islam, with its many falsehoods, is such a weak and fragile religion that it can stand up to or hold up to criticism, at all. No matter how very mild those criticisms might be.
E T says
I truly wish the OIC yo-yos would shut the hellfire up.
owensgate says
Well, just call me a “scoffinternationallaw”. What the hell is “international law” anyway? Does anyone actually get a degree in “International Law”? Are there “International Law” Lawyers? Here’s a “skoff” for their new International Law: All Muslims are going to Hell, and that’s a Biblical Truth. OK, “International Sherriff”, come get me.
John says
Islam is a totalitarian political ideology and not a religion. With that it is counter to the values of any secular democracy and should be banned.
Jeanne Kopang says
Islam / Tararrush gamea perpetrated against women in crowds, legal religious sexual freedom to force rape, coerce rape, grope, its like jonestown, a sex cult.
gravenimage says
OIC top dog demands international law to criminalize criticism of Islam
…………….
Under Shari’ah law no one can criticize Islam. Of course Muslims want to impose this on us.