The OIC has been trying to compel the West to criminalize criticism of Islam for many years. Now they see their main chance.
“Pakistan to raise Quran desecration incident at EU, OIC,” by Islamuddin Sajid, Anadolu Agency, November 24, 2019:
Pakistan on Sunday decided to take up the recent incident of desecration of the Muslims’ Holy Book, the Quran, in Norway at the European Union and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
The decision was taken in a meeting of the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) core committee, a forum of the party’s top leadership, chaired by Prime Minister Imran Khan here at Islamabad.
“The meeting has condemned the incident of the disrespect of the Holy Quran and decided to raise the issue at EU and OIC forums,” Firdous Ashiq Awan, prime minister’s special assistant on Information, told reporters after the meeting.
Pakistan will present a resolution at EU and OIC level and would demand to discourage and stop such actions that affect the sentiments of Muslims across the world, she added….
mgoldberg says
As opposed to the intelligence agency of Pakistans support and training of those who attacked India, particularly the mumbai 2008′ attack that slaughtered so many innocents, wounded a couple hundred, including the slaughtering of a Rabbi, his wife, and their unborn child who was cut out of her womb for slaughter. They, were not even at the slaughter site, but were chosen miles away, simply for being jews. This slaughter never taken responsibility by the OIC’s. This… is not some rare occurrence but rather all too regular, across the globe. Think mentioning this as a counterpoint- that is, the horrific worldwide Jihad, as brought to all ‘infidels’ as well as muslims who don’t measure up to the Jihadists, will ever be brought up?
Don’t bet on it.
Michael Copeland says
Prevention of hurt feelings?
No.
A malignant attack on free speech.
Walter Sieruk says
Here again it’s so important a message that it need to be repeated . the message is that a more intelligent thing to do than burn the Quran is to reveal the “reasoning” flaws that the apologists for the Quran proclaim .
For example, a claim by many Muslims is that no one can produce something as beautiful as the Quran in the way the words are arranged and thus it can only be of God. This claim should be answered.
First, all someone has to do is examine some of the great works of literature to fine much written beauty. Such as the Greek epic poet Homer with his Iliad and Odyssey and then Virgil who produced the Aeneid has beauty. Even one of the non-Bible books in the Apocrypha called The Song of Three Children is also very beautiful. Thus just because someone sees a work that is written in great beauty doesn’t mean it’s inspired by God.
Second, the scholar Edward Gibbon wrote after an examination of the Quran that it is an “incoherent jumble of fable and precept and declamation which seldom excites a sentiment or an idea, sometimes craws in the dust and is sometimes lost in the clouds…” The writer Thomas Carlyle wrote the Quran is “A wearisome jumble, crude, incondite [with] endless iterations [and] long-windedness…” Likewise, the philosopher David Hume was NOT favorably impressed after reading the Quran.
[Source of the three scholars mentioned – Secrets of The Koran: Revealing Insight Into Islam’s Holy Book .56,66, by Don Richardson]
Second , the following should be taken into consideration. Of course the Muslim who reads the Quran will see great beauty in the way the words are arranged. This is, in part, because of the power of suggestion after being told so many times that the Quran is so beautifully written. That’s an old brainwashing method, repeating and being told that same thing again and again. Since he or she is always being told the same lie will end up believing that lie. In addition to that, the Imams try to discourage their people from reading other works, such as the Bible, so then they don’t have much or anything to compare or contrast the Quran with. Of course there are some Muslim’s that do read other works, but they are exceptions and they read other things only after they were already brainwashed by the Imams. In short, the Muslims can’t read the Quran objectively because their Imams have programmed them to have a strong bias towards it.
Edmund says
a resolution at EU and OIC level and would demand to discourage and stop such actions (…)
Totalitarian leaders are demanding respect, to their totally unrespectable ideology, becouse his ancester called it: “religion”. Hail Fuhrer and death to all which do not want say it too. How pathethic is this message.
Go to hell with those lies – this should be our answer !
Walter Sieruk says
It needs to be reiterated that a better ,,as in a more intelligent and sophisticated way deal with Quran than to burn it is to expose the many errors and contradictions this religious book contains.
This has already been done on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Quran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Quran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran. Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.”
Nevertheless, in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses.
For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.” In conclusion, the Quran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Even though the above essay was posted before, it should now be added that the last statement of the above that “the Quran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.” To put this in a Biblical way. As in from the Bible, it may be truly explained that the Quran is a deceptive work of “the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.” Ephesians 14:12.. [N.I.V.]
Edmund says
There is just much simplier method then “fixing” the world or moral problems of the nations on the second part of the globe. Becouse it would never work. Just ignore them, and do not let them into Your countries. West is importing a plaque, becosue their so called “tolerance”, so will pay will blood for it.
This is so simple. Never, ever, invite enemy to Your house.
PRCS says
They’re already here, Edmund–many of them born here.
Got a game plan B?
Edmund says
Stop further migration, educate society about problem then penalize this system. If anybody is not happy about that, he can just return to his islamic “paradise”.
But that is absolutely unreal in current time. Only other totalitarian systems like China are doing something whit that problem. Camping people is not right. There are plenty of right methods to eradicate it. First should be an education and then absolute ban, like ex. Christiany is bannned in Saudi Arabia.
PRCS says
They’re already here, Edmund–many of them born here.
Those born here won’t be ‘returning’ anywhere.
Emma says
the governments in the west could remove or reduce considerably the social benefits like social welfare, free health, housing and education to anyone who has not lived in the country for a minimum amount of time (ex. 10 years) and who has not worked or paid a certain amount of taxes. By doing this under the guise of cutting down on government expenses, the islamic group of immigrants cannot claim discrimination since it would apply to everyone.
gravenimage says
Agree with Edmund. End Muslim immigration–we’ve already moved in that direction in the US–and start deporting Muslims, starting with the worst Jihadists.
We were almost entirely safe from Jihad when Islam was isolated.
CogitoErgoSum says
The Norwegians should really stop giving money to Pakistan.
somehistory says
moslims whine and moslims demand and plot and scheme and riot and scream for everyone to give in to them and do as they wish.
If they were told, “Go away, you bother me,” and then when they rioted and disrupted society, and burned and killed, they were met with the consequences others would if doing these things, they would some day get the idea that they couldn’t have things their way…everywhere.
But many ‘leaders’ give in to their whining and demanding and riots and screaming, and say, “Okay, just don’t take out your anger by attacking us, and we’ll give you what you want.”
And in this case, they want the guy who burned the filthy, unholy book, hanged or death by some other way. And the end result is, everyone has to consider that moslims have sensitive “feelings” and they have absolutely no self-control…so when their feelings are “hurt,” they must strike out to severely injure or kill the one who hurt the feelings;and everyone else too.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Pakistan will present a resolution at EU and OIC level and would demand to discourage and stop such actions that affect the sentiments of Muslims across the world, she added….
And as long as they’re all together having their islamic powwow maybe they can discuss some other related issues, like the mass rape of our kids and women by muslim men, the murder of gays getting thrown from buildings for muslim bigotry, ISIS who kills and destroys to enforce SHARIA, their sexual mutilation and forced marriage of young girls, the rampant antisemitism throughout the umma, the persecution of Christians and other minorities in the Middle East and elsewhere to the point of extinction, the endless terrorism done in the name of islam… ya know, trivial sh*t like that!
Excuse my language, but just who in the f*ck do these muslims in another country think they are? telling us how to think and feel in our own nations. Even if islam weren’t violent we are still under no obligation to respect it since it’s little more than superstitious nonsense. If someone walked up to me and said they have a god called the “spaghetti monster” and I gotta respect it or else, I’d tell them to go “F” their self. Islam is no different to me. I don’t have to feel intimidated for some idiotic, childish gibberish that calls me a “dhimmi” and has a god that threatens my life because I don’t wanna belief. I got a message for these retards, and it goes something like this:
“F*CK OFF, GO BLOW, AND KISS MY A$$”
And ps, I’m burning a koran right now while p*ssing all over it. Just thought you muslims should know.
Bigoted idiots, low IQ’d freaks, devoid of spiritual wisdom with no knowledge of god.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Correction, “…wanna believe,” not belief. I can’t spell when I’m uncontrollably angry.
I can’t get over these muslims, they’re like little babies who think the whole world is supposed to revolve around them. Waaa waaaa! you hurt our feelings… waaaa waaaaa, you won’t respect our crazy and violent delusions….WAAAAAAAAAA! :((
It sure would be nice if they could at least work their way up to the 20th century, it would be a lot easier to bridge a 100 year gap than the 1000 we’re expected to now.
Edmund says
That is a spirit ! Spirit of free and right man, which despise evil. Every kid in a school should know what is Islam and why it is a totalitarian ideology. And why free speech and ability to express Yoursefl in every matter, is so important in healthy, democratic society.
Would be banned quickly, country after country. His tabarnacle closed, any positive propaganda about it, severy penalized as – crime !
Save Europe says
Excuse my language, but just who in the f*ck do these muslims in another country think they are?
*****
Please don’t apologise ?????
Infidel says
So Pakistan is a member of the EU now? If not, how did they get to raise anything at a EU meeting?
Given that the Brits want out, as do more and more Italians, Austrians and Frenchmen, maybe the EU should open its doors to Turkey, Pakistan and every other Muslim state that wants to join. Then strangle them w/ the usual EU regulations on the contours of a toilet seat to the shape of a banana
Giacomo Latta says
My thoughts exactly.
gravenimage says
Pakistan to raise Norway Qur’an burning at EU to push for international blasphemy laws
…………………..
Pakistan has already gotten US social media outlets to warn users when their content is illegal in Pakistan. Why should we care?
I hope the EU tells them to take a flying leap.
Infidel says
Precisely! I for one do not post anything for the edification of people in either Pakistan or Bangladesh
gravenimage says
+1
Paul says
So if I download a digital copy of the Qur’an and then put it in the trash and empty it, have I committed blasphemy? Would they kill me in Pakistan?
gravenimage says
Yep.
Sandy says
So I suppose the attacks on Christian churches and monuments isn’t a desecration while burning a book is.
Carol the 1st says
We’ve got thicker skin and our religion can also stand on its own two feet without props. Speaking of free speech and social media, David Woods has a sadly hilarious Boom Boom Room episode:
Muhammad Meets YouTube’s Trust and Safety Team (Muhammad’s Boom-Boom Room)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yznTLrc-oDo