That “Islamophobes” will be excluded along with “racists” and “sexists” is clear from the fact that the UK government includes those who oppose jihad mass murder and Sharia oppression of women on its enemies and classifies such opposition as a form of “racism.” It is also clear from the seizure of the foster children from families that supports UKIP. Britain’s descent into totalitarianism has been swift and virtually unnoticed. Soon, however, it will be obvious and unmistakable to everyone, as its influence spreads elsewhere.
“UK National Health Service to Deny Treatment to ‘Racists’ and ‘Sexists,’” by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News, November 5, 2019 (thanks to the Geller Report):
A National Health Service (NHS) trust in the UK has announced that it will deny treatment to patients it deems are ‘racists’ or ‘sexists’….
The North Bristol NHS Trust said that “threatening and offensive language,” as well as “racist or sexist language, gestures or behaviour” and “malicious allegations” would all be punishable offenses.
Patients who commit such an infraction will be subject to a “sports-style disciplinary yellow card and then final red card in which treatment would be withdrawn as soon as is safe.”
“We have staff from many different backgrounds, from all over the world, and we pride ourselves on our commitment to equality which is a fundamental value of the NHS,” said Andrea Young, Chief Executive for North Bristol NHS Trust.
“We’re sending a strong signal that any racism or discrimination is completely unacceptable – we want staff to challenge and report it and we want everyone to know that it will have consequences,” she added.
The problem here of course is that the definition of what constitutes ‘racism’ or ‘sexism’ gets broader with each passing day….
Foster parents have also had children removed from their care by the state because they were supporters of UKIP and not vehement supporters of “multiculturalism.”…
This is even worse than China’s social credit score, which to my knowledge doesn’t yet punish people by withdrawing medical treatment if they engage in wrongthink.
First it was deplatforming people from social media websites, then it was deplatforming people from bank accounts and mortgages. Now it’s deplatforming people from hospital treatment.
Literally eliminating people’s right to basic health care because of their political or social opinions….
somehistory says
If one does not accept the “mark of the beast in forehead or hand,” then one cannot “buy or sell.”
Revelation 13
Oldone says
You, I think, are on to something…
somehistory says
Thank you. I believe it fits.
Lydia Church says
It fits!
What is happening, is they are leading up to that. They are leading the population into that mindset. That it’s okay to withhold basic human rights in a civilized, humane, and democratic society from those who disagree with ‘us.’ Like someone said further down, it’s worse than the Chinese social credit score. (But for those who still don’t get it that healthcare is a human right… like wow. Seriously? Don’t even get me started!)
But that’s what happened during the Holocaust. The Jews were denied this, they were denied that, and the propaganda had it so that the people either simply accepted it without question, or they just remained silent about it. And now they are coming for us, the Christians. Soon, all manner of basic necessities will be withheld from us for merely holding onto our Christian views. We see this starting already with Christian businesses who do the right thing and refuse to cave to the agendas of sin. And eventually, yes, they will roll out the actual mark of the beast and then where will people run? It’s a fork in the road, you either die a martyr and refuse the mark as a Christian and end up in heaven, or you take it to buy yourself a little more time and land your rear in hell. Ain’t no third option!
Frank Anderson says
L.C. I suggest, and hope for a third alternative: God’s mercy is beyond our ability to understand or limit. God knows our intentions. The intention to survive means we treasure the Gift of God, Life, enough to endure. How many children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob endured 400 years of Egyptian slavery before the Exodus to continue their 3700 year struggle to live to this day? Consider along the way the Roman occupation of Israel where 3 wars included the crucifixion of about 2 million Jews, (Jews, God and History, Rabbi Max Dimond). “Let there be life!” is interpreted by the Rabbi Maimonides to mean “all rules bend as necessary for the preservation of life.” If we don’t want to be slaves or martyrs, we had better get busy.
Frank Anderson says
What can possibly go wrong with totalitarian “single payer health ‘care'”? Mother government loves you and will take care of you from conception to death, as long as Mother Government says when you are conceived and put to death. (sarcasm intended along with truth). “For everything the government can do for you it can also do something to you.” Ronald Reagan. I continue in my opinion that the UK National Health Service has killed more people by denial of service and rationing than died in the Holocaust. Yet the UK NHS is one of the largest single employers in the world.
James Lincoln says
Frank Anderson,
Very perceptive analysis, my compliments.
I’ve never been a big fan of “single-payer healthcare”, i.e. “Medicare For All”, for many reasons.
But, I must admit, I never considered the possibility of denial of service / rationing based upon someone’s political – or other beliefs.
Frank Anderson says
J.L., greetings and best wishes. Remember the basic description of a sociopath, a person with no sense of legal, moral or ethical limitation. A sociopath always acts on the assumption that anything he does is right. ALL options and opportunities to impose his will and control are available. A shortcut to analyze any situation is to ask “Would Adolf Hitler do this if he had the opportunity?” We are dealing with tens and hundreds of thousands of “civil servants” and leaders with the goal of purging society of all resistance by any means not just necessary, but available. No totalitarian government in history has ever shown any reluctance at killing its own people in any number to obtain its control. One of the reports from the Soviet Union after Stalin’s death said he had quotas for each governmental unit (state) for an arbitrary number of people to be killed, with or without reason; If the state did not kill the quota, the governor would be killed. Health care rationing is a good way to quietly kill millions with little notice: They were going to die anyway!
somehistory says
Much like what happened not that long ago with the baby that needed care that a doctor in the U.S. said he could try, to give the infant a chance at living. I believe Mr. Trump asked to fly the child to the U.S. for the treatment. The U.K. so-called “health care” demigods said “no.”
If I recall correctly, there were two such children, and one was invited to be treated in Italy, offered citizenship by that country, the pope saying that he would have the child flown there, and the U.K. “demigods” of “health care” said “no.”
Both children died while their parents…strangers all over the world…and several governments, begged those with their hands on the controls to allow the children to have a better chance instead of being allowed to die by starvation.
Frank Anderson says
s.H., that is the problem with death panels in the US or anywhere else. Under Obama care, the medical effectiveness review committee that passed completely un-noticed as part of an earlier law, (the stimulus package?) was established to set rules. The obvious result is the reversal of a history of attempts to save the dying. Some of those heroic attempts saved lives while others helped learn so that future cases might have happier prospects.
As I recall, and welcome correction if in error, at one time childhood cancer was a death sentence more than 80 percent of the time. But thanks at least in part to Danny Thomas and St. Jude Hospital it is now reversed, with as many as 80 percent surviving. I have witnessed how a friend’s infant grandson was diagnosed with cancer. Less than 12 hours later an ambulance came from Memphis to Birmingham to try to save the baby’s life. Sadly, that was one that did not succeed. The point I seek to make is that without such heroic efforts, treatments and cures will not be found. Death panels want to kill all who are inconvenient to save resources for their favored patients.
I heard a speaker talking about this in 2002, He was my Rabbi’s cousin who was invited to speak as a Scholar in Residence over a weekend. I recorded his presentations and became disgusted. The “Complete Lives System” as he explained, considers anyone under the age of 15 and over the age of 50 as worthless for expensive medical treatment. Everyone in that audience was over 50 with few exceptions; but none dared question him. One more reason that I do not miss being present in that community. To teach that the First Mitzvah of 613 is that “ALL rules bend as necessary for the preservation of life” and then to limit that teaching without question to the age range of 15 to 50 is hard to understand or accept.
gravenimage says
That’s this awful story, Somehistory:
“British toddler Alfie Evans not allowed to leave country, UK court says”
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/25/health/alfie-evans-appeal-bn/index.html
This is just sickening. It would not have cost the UK a cent.
Frank Anderson says
But it would have shown how murderous and indifferent those in control can be. It those children survived the problems others would have to be treated. They want, from what I heard in 2002, to kill all they can’t afford to treat. According to the speaker, a mentor of Obamacare architect Ezekiel Emmanuel, animals are entitled to legal rights, but not humans.
gravenimage says
Grimly spot on, Frank.
Frank Anderson says
GI, I continue to suggest that the Michael York movie Logan’s Run is the ideal dream of totalitarian ambition.
gravenimage says
Frank, “1984” was not far off, either.
Frank Anderson says
I suggest there is a stark contrast in the 2 stories: In 1984 people lived in shear terror and misery, Big Brother Is Watching. In Logan’s Run they lived their allotted 30 years in mindless pleasure, drugged and seduced by the riches of government generosity, until they were murdered..
gravenimage says
You are right, Frank–more like the model in “Brave New World”.
Frank Anderson says
GI, I read the book but do not recall a Brave New World movie. Logan’s Run is such a magnificent visual experience, with incredible work for the 1960’s (?), long before any Computer Generated Graphics, that it is still to this day vivid. It could be that BNW inspired Logan’s Run to some extent. I don’t know.
somehistory says
I recall Logan’s Run and it’s awfulness. There is also Soylent Green, where the old and sickly were murdered and their flesh made into to food for the working class, whereas the rich and powerful had fresh “real food” like strawberries.
Frank Anderson says
A monumentally gruesome vision for the future. Certainly one extreme possible under socialism. Can Logan’s Run be considered the sugar coated fantasy version used to sell socialism to ignorant fools who have no information about what totalitarian control has done whenever imposed? I can’t see in my imagination how 1984 or Soylent Green would be examples for the socialists of today to aspire or sell.
Frank Anderson says
S.H. as I recall in the opening scene of Soylent Green, there was a riot and people were being scooped up into dump trucks. Old and infirm were not the only targets for disposal. Totalitarian societies do not permit or tolerate dissent, which is why Antifa gets away with its riots passed off as “protests”. As predicted we will provide the rope (the liberties) that will be used to hang us.
somehistory says
Yes, F. A.
Thank you. I had forgotten the opening scene. And just as scary as the some of the major scenes in the Donald Sutherland/Leonard Nimoy version of The Body Snatchers. (I’ve seen the original too many times to count. The workers in the fields singing was one of the worst.)
For Soyent Green, Anyone found to be fomenting change or rebellion…or wanting to eat real food…had the same fate as the old and infirm. And, if I recall correctly, the ones allowed to live had to be good at something that those in charge found useful.
One other very important point: it was all due to “climate” changes.
Frank Anderson says
S.H. the climate has changed many times before humans and will change many times after humans. The irrational blame on humans is just another excuse to impose social control. Look at the numbers please.
somehistory says
F.A.
No, I wan’t saying what you understood me to say. The movie had the idea that it was necessary to kill off all the useless people, the sick, old, and unskilled, rebellious, etc.
Because of climate change.
I am fully aware that the “climate change” thing is bogus. As you say, it is not in a steady state…ever since the Great Flood in Noah’s day, the climate has been changing. and when it is ‘warm’ where I am, the climate is much different in Siberia.
But just as now…in real life…the movie had the idea that killing off huge numbers of the population was necessary due to ‘climate change’ I don’t agree with the current thinking of real people, nor with the fictional characters in the movie….climate change would still happen no matter how small…or large..the population of mankind, cows, chickens, or other creatures.
Frank Anderson says
S.H. thank you for the correction, We agree. I spent more than 4 hours listening to the speaker I discussed elsewhere in this article. Burdensome humans should be eliminated; but animals should be protected was HIS unchallenged proposition. I hope I can find the tape and transfer it to DVD. It is not only in movies that “useless” people are to be eliminated. Hitler did it as much as he could with any handicapped or offensive people, even “Aryan’s” that he and his entourage considered burdens. I’m have no reason to doubt anyone considered a burden under Communism has a low life expectancy. The people who write the movies have to run really fast to stay ahead of evil people who actually do things. Peace and best wishes to you. I don’t think we even need to consider how islam would deal with its burdensome people, perhaps by strapping a vest on them and sending them on a one-way mission? Of course, as I understand, every human being is a burden intended to suffer and die in the service of its god.
somehistory says
The True God promises ‘life’ to His children who are obedient to Him. The Bible says that “Christ died that we might live.”
Adam and Eve would have kept living…would still be alive today…if they had been obedient and not partaken of the one fruit, out of all of the many fruits in the Garden, that they were told they should not eat..
Because they didn’t keep the commandment, they threw away eternal life for everyone that would be born. But, because Christ was willing to die as a human, He bought back eternal life for all human creation that accepts His ultimate sacrifice, and exercises faith in Him. Many have put faith in His promises, even to death, knowing they are promised a resurrection. And Christ even promised that some “will never die at all.” That is what I believe.
Frank Anderson says
S.H. many people believe as you, including some of my very best and treasured friends. I think we are all truly children of God. It took 3 parents to create us. The God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus is the God of Life and Freedom. The god of islam is the god of death and slavery. They cannot be the same, no matter what the Pope says. Peace be with you.
gravenimage says
Frank:
https://phdessay.com/the-similarities-between-the-books-brave-new-world-and-logans-run/
In both cases the society appears superficially to be some kind of utopia, albeit a rather shallow one, but underneath is anything but.
Frank Anderson says
GI, thank you. You are amazing for your research skills. A most interesting comparison.
gravenimage says
Thank you Frank. So glad you are back here–I had missed corresponding with you.
Frank Anderson says
GI, thank you for all you do. I am trying to slow down because of health. 3 doctors appointment in 3 days trying to get better. Sincere, devoted friendship and best wishes.
gravenimage says
Wish you all the best with your health, Frank.
Emilie Green says
“‘ . . . and we pride ourselves on our commitment to equality which is a fundamental value of the NHS,’ said Andrea Young, Chief Executive for North Bristol NHS Trust”
If even remotely true, such a hideous statement would never, ever have been issued.
On the other hand, if some are more equal than others, it makes perfect sense.
Tuvia Fogel says
I am a proud Islamophobe (at least as proud as 80 years ago I would have been of being a Nazophobe), so if I have a heart attack while in Britain, I shall be left to die on the street. Good to know.
Carolyne says
“We pride ourselves on our equality of treatment,” says the NHS, except to those with whom they politically disagree. They might be able to stop people’s speech, but they will never be able to stop thinking. England, the land of Magna Carta , Churchill and Shakespeare, is lost forever.
GreekEmpress says
+1
So true. So sad.
gravenimage says
All too true, Carolyne.
Jayell says
The NHS is essentially a nationalised health insurance organisation for which all UK citizens pay. It is not a branch of the legal system and has neither machinery nor mandate to act as arbiters of UK law. These people will also dispense treatment to those who are not UK citizens or otherwise have made no payment into the system, nor likely to do so, whilst denying medical services to those who have and who pay the wages of NHS staff. This is an absolutely abysmal dereliction of their duty to the UK taxpayer and should not be tolerated under any circumstances. Furthermore, those NHS staff who indulge themselves in this pseudo-moralistic charade should be dragged before the courts and made to answer for themselvdes and pay appropriate compensation from their own pockets.
Frank Anderson says
In the US the courts are not always inclined to serve justice. In the UK under the present domination of muslim collaborators I speculate the prospects for any legal challenge border on hopeless; even to the extent of fines and sanctions being imposed for filing a case. Can you imagine any UK judge ruling against the NHS on this issue? Can you imagine any appeal court supporting such a claim? The claim for dereliction of duty, or breach of fiduciary duty is as legally correct as I can imagine. But the corrupt system in charge has nothing to do with man-made rules and law.
terry sullivan says
public sector needs reining in–a massive cull as a starter?
Carl McGee says
NHS to deny healthcare to certain unprotected groups proving that contrary to the liberal mantra, healthcare is NOT a universal human right.
DBM echo says
Very astute observation.
FYI says
Would Justin Trudeau be permitted to get medical treatment in the UK given his penchant for wearing Afro wigs and blackface?
Actually he would probably be OK:Justin appears to have what the ‘woke’ and the Leftists claim is a special honor reserved for the fortunate elite:White Privilege
Justin Trudeau……..has WHITE PRIVILEGE.
Think about it:nobody else{certainly no white politician}could get away with it unless they were favored by the political gods and had some special permission to get away with it.
That special permission is what they call white privilege isn’t it?
Lucky Justin!
Carl says
The twin towers showed the true bravery of the West.
Phil Copson says
Before you all get too carried away, try re-reading what it says: people appear to be imagining that the NHS is setting-up a data base of people to whom treatment will be denied on the grounds that the Government disapproves of their politics.
What it actually says is that North Bristol hospital trust have decided that people who abuse the nursing staff will be given the minimum amount of treatment and sent on their way pdq.
Am sure that many JW readers will have personal experience, or have family or friends who know what it’s like to be on duty in the Accident and Emergency department of a hospital, and have to deal with drunks aggressively demanding immediate attention for minor injuries sustained in fights or falling over, and then abusing the staff when they have to wait their turn.
The comment about foster-parents having children removed from their care because Left-wing social-workers pretend to believe that anyone who votes UKIP and believes in living in an independent self-governing country must automatically be “a racist” is a whole different subject.
(My own politics don’t really concern anybody else of course, but I do believe that both my maid-servant and my golliwog support Brexit….)
No Muzzies Here says
In the UK they throw you in jail for pointing out that there are Muslim rape gangs. If you are actually a Muslim in one of those gangs, the government will protect you so that you can continue raping.
Now they will deny you health services, that you paid for through taxes, if you point out that some Muslims are in a rape gang that the government has protected.
What will the UK government do next to force the British subjects to accept their new overlords?
Dave says
Damned shame you have all been disarmed, without weapons resistance is pretty much a matter of numbers.
terry sullivan says
plenty of guns
Frank Anderson says
T.S. I suggest in order to keep (or reduce) attacks on this site and the community who join here that we prefer votes over violence. We are confronted with amazing ignorance and willful denial. Every person we can bring to our side is one less for “them” and one more for “us”. Most welcome of all are those who have the courage and understanding to leave islam and join the civilized world; because they might be the most persuasive of all in getting others to join in a non-violent resistance. Please be thoughtful.
gravenimage says
Yes–the most important thing is to continue to educate people.
travellingintime15 says
Wouldn’t this be a breach of the Hippocratic Oath? Israel provides medical treatment for its enemies but England won’t treat Islamophobes. This is morally bankrupt.
gravenimage says
+1
Hugh Fitzgerald says
There is an ideology which declares women to be inferior in intelligence to men, that permits husbands to beat their wives if they merely suspect them of disobedience, that allows a husband to take up to four wives, that gives a daughter half the inheritance given to. a son, that considers a woman’s testimony to be worth half that of a man. That is clear-cut “sexism.”
Will all those guilty of such obvious “sexism” be denied NHS benefits? No? Why not? .
Carl says
Pardon me, but the daughter will receive only 1/2 the welfare in UK? ?
gravenimage says
Good point, Hugh.
The fact is that Muslims are more likely than any other group to be aggressive or abusive with medical personnel. But they are not mentioned here, of course.
Angemon says
So if a patient with severe pain snaps at a BAME female nurse they would get punished – presumably by refusing/delaying treatment. Which would make them more prone to snap.
No, the subjectivity of those terms is not the problem here. The problem is that a state-funded organization organization that shouldn’t discriminate against based on anything (other than triage, that is) is, in fact, discriminating against. The irony? The level of overlap between those shouting that “universal health care is a human right” and those defending the denial of treatment to “wrongthinkers”.
Spiro says
So I would guess that Christaphobia is included
Or in other words discrimination against Christians is
Included in their list
David Stephenson says
This development is so appalling it leaves me speechless. And yet, not a peep in the msm. Not a bit of coverage. I agree with Mr. Spencer that Britain is in full totalitarian mode at this point. It’s the future of every Western country if we don’t reverse the tide making us minorities in our own homelands.
DHazard says
Revive the old debtor’s prisons but this time focus less on debtors and more on innocent, productive, law abiding citizens. You want to make them afraid of improvising lines that aren’t in the script; a script that is constantly being updated by someone who hates them (and possibly themselves). Hating Jews is still OK and will be for the forseeable future.
Tom says
Abuse of people working doing their job in health care or other public service is never acceptable. That said, the UK seems to be rapidly declining into a totalitarian state. Is the next step for anyone considered a homophobe, racist or Islamaphobe to be the Re Education Centres ie The Gulag ?
Dawne Swift says
I can’t be sure about this, but it may be that the Trust is saying that if patients abuse staff racially or because of their sex (while being treated) then the hospital will refuse to continue to treat them, rather than it being a question of they’ll look through the Facebook posts etc. I do understand that it’s concerning that what is “racial” or “sexist” abuse can be subjective and sometimes ridiculous, but there is a very real problem in some areas of NHS staff being abused and attacked. In some Accident & Emergency departments police have to patrol to protect the staff, and ambulance crew have some areas they won’t go to without a police escort because otherwise they’re attacked.
Save Europe says
I’m not proud of it, but I smoke 60 cigarettes a day.
Sadly, I’m not joking.
Based on the amount of tax I pay on all the cigarettes, I’ve earned the right to a face transplant from Ryan Gosling, and the free-thought to be deeply disturbed by Islam, in my country.
Oh, and a ‘p***s extension’, should I choose to go in to ‘adult film work.’
Frank Anderson says
S.E., we are not the ones allowed to decide what we earn. In this environment the death panels decide who they want to benefit and keep alive, and who they want to neglect and kill. They would probably be quite good with a sex-change operation and all the hormone therapy to follow but would never aid you in resisting even with thoughts and words the ongoing Islamic conquest. “Elections [and invasions] have consequences.” Just look at the French following the Nazi invasion in WWII. Most of Europe appears to be run by invaders and Quislings. I wish for better.
gravenimage says
UK: National Health Service to deny treatment to “racists,” “sexists,” and “Islamophobes”
………………
*What the hell*?!?!
Not only is it sickening that “Islamophobes”–those warning against the threat of Islam–are being lumped in with racists and sexists, but this whole thing is grotesque.
First, let me say that I am *no* fan of racism and sexism, which I find abhorrent.
But we are talking about medical treatment here–and, moreover, taxpayer-funded medical care.
There should be *no* ideological litmus test for receiving medical care–I don’t care *what* someone’s beliefs are.
The only exception should be if someone is physically threatening medical personnel–then they may need police present to protect them.
What the hell is happening to Briton? This is morally appalling–far worse than the “crime” itself. (and worse yet if applied to those trying to protect against Jihad).
OREN WYSOCKI says
No national media to contact about obvious discrimination against whites and the victims of islam, no courts that will hear your case, no politicians who will even speak of the matter. In G-d I trust.
Infidel says
That’s why I’m against British influence spreading anywhere! It’s all fine to wax eloquent about the Magna Carta and Churchill, but once you allow them to be the standard, you also have to embrace their endorsement of concepts like gender fluidity or denial of healthcare to people deemed abominable
So like Vegas, we should take the stance that what happens in UK stays in UK. And not take inspiration from the Guardian, the Daily Mail, Sadiq Khan, Nigel Farage or anyone else there.
Rev G says
Do these undesirables then get to pay no income taxes, since the government is depriving them of the primary benefit of paying them? Seems only fair. Of course, that might create a queue of persons wanting to be labeled as such.
Frank Anderson says
This is not an example of “you get what you pay for”. Would Jews get anything for being robbed of enough wealth to pay about a third of Nazi expenses for WWII? YES, they were gassed and worked to death. I am sure the Nazis were quite grateful for the Jewish contributions. Jews who were able to escape generally got out with the clothes on their backs, and if really lucky, 10 dollars in their pockets. I had the gift of knowing one. Same Story Different Day. Learn from the past or repeat it.
John says
As most Muslims are racists, does that mean that Muslims will not be treated?
David Ashton says
Those of us saw this totalitarianism coming, from personal observation and documentation of its development from Herbert Marcuse and the “race, gender, class” movement in the US five decades ago to the Equality Act and the “equality, diversity, inclusion” state ideology in the UK, warned against it time and again, our analysis and predictions falling on deaf ears, complacent hearts and collaborator minds.
Frank Anderson should forget about Hitler for a moment, and turn his attention to opposing those of Jewish heritage – observant or apostate – who are still campaigning for multiculturalism and an open door to Muslims and other communities who have less love for Israel than they do for Europe and America.
Frank Anderson says
David, I was attracted to Judaism by 3 statements I heard the first day a Jewish friend invited me to Saturday Torah Study and services in 1992. 1) Wisdom is its own authority without regard to source or method of publication; 2) Whenever wisdom is in human hands there is also some measure of error or deception. The challenge of life is to distinguish the wisdom and put it to work in our lives. 3) ASK every question repeatedly because every time a question is asked and answers honestly sought we come closer to finding the truth. We will find THE Truth only when we see God.
I agree that many Jews in the US are not friends of sense and security for civilization. That is why my welcome in the Jewish community expired after more than 20 years. They have a right to decide who they welcome and I have a right to decide what I will agree to and submit to. That does not change what is taught, but not practiced, the value and wisdom I see, which is without reasonable argument the wisdom of a teacher named Jesus who lived and taught as a matter of faith more or less 2000 years ago.
I oppose all who practice abandonment of wisdom, common sense and survival. Those who betray every teaching they and their ancestors have lived and practiced for 3700 years are in the same order of 1 percent of the total population of betrayers of civilization as the 1 percent of the German population that was Jewish at the time of Hitler. Out of 7 billion people more or less, there are about 16 million Jews.
It is not just 75 percent of US Jews, it is the Pope and all his minions and Quislings all around the world who have no appreciation, much less love, for Israel and Western Civilization. Judaism is the smallest part of the people who are surrendering to people who have killed between 250 million and 1000 million human beings and enslaved more billions in the 1400 years of mindless conquest. Blaming Jews and ignoring all the other sell-outs, collaborators, traitors and Quislings is right out of Hitler’s playbook, which should serve those who oppose those “plays” as well as it serves those who follow them. “Those who cannot remember the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them.” Jorge Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905). Why should we ignore those lessons to reinvent the wheel? “Profit by others’ mistakes; You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself and too high a price has been paid for them already.”
The teachings of Judaism include an incredible statement that there are NO perfect people. Just because 75 percent of US Jews vote for people who will cheerfully exterminate them given the opportunity does not change the fact that great wisdom is present in their teaching in spite of their practice. I’m sorry you don’t seem to like what I write. If you don’t there is no requirement that you read it. There is plenty elsewhere.
gravenimage says
David Ashton wrote:
Frank Anderson should forget about Hitler for a moment, and turn his attention to opposing those of Jewish heritage – observant or apostate – who are still campaigning for multiculturalism and an open door to Muslims and other communities who have less love for Israel than they do for Europe and America.
……………
Leftist Jews are no more clueless than are Leftist Gentiles. The implication that they are worse than Hitler is grotesque.
Cuzilla47 says
This is right out of the Nazi playbook. Socialists of a feather commit atrocities together!
Greg says
I wouldn’t agree that this is a worthwhile story for Jihad Watch to be posting about.
As far I’m aware, this isn’t about anyone being banned from treatment because of their controversial political views (which would be seriously scary if it really were talking about that) but about people having their treatment withdrawn if they are abusive to staff.
The only way it could involve “Islamophobia” is if (a) patients are being abusive to Muslim doctors or nurses etc. (and they shouldn’t be doing that), or (b) a patient wants to bring up the religion of a staff member. Now it’s certainly possible that comments could be misinterpreted as “Islamophobia”, but when getting treatment at a hospital it’s probably not the right time to be discussing religion with a stranger anyway. Maybe there could be situation (c) where two patients get in trouble for a private conversation about religion that gets overheard, but maybe let’s wait for an actual case of that.
Harry Spitz says
And who didn’t see this coming?|
The amazing thing is that it took so long.
1984 was not supposed to be a “how to” manual.
Frank Anderson says
H.S. I suggest if you read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, at least the 200 more or less pages from the end of WWI to Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor Jan 30, 1933, and continue to the September 1, 1939 invasion of Poland, 1984 is based on large part with that experience. It gets even more graphic as WWII continues, with all the surveillance and propaganda measures.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; This is the National Health Service the Democrats want for America.
We have been warned.
Trump 2020.
UNCLE VLADDI says
If it excludes all “sexists” that means it will no longer agree to treat any muslims, right? Right?!
Try: “ISLAM IS RIGHT ABOUT WOMEN” and see what the NHS has to say about it LOL!
Adrian Roberts says
This story sounds bad but it’s nothing new. It’s just someone in this NHS trust who wants to score a few brownie points. There has been no change to the law.
Larry A. Singleton says
“we want staff to challenge and report it”
Now the fascism that is the Soviet styled “Community Standards” thought police on Fakebook and Twitter encouraging generations of useful idiots to “report” mostly conservative “hate speech” is infesting so-called “health and human services”.
Still “Blocked”/Censored for “30 days” and Disappeared from “Family and Friends” in Fakebook Gulag. “Blocked”/Censored on Twitter regularly for exposing this “LGBTQ/Transgender obscenity being forced on young children in our schools.
Ber5 says
Funny how they preach tolerance but actually practice everything but.
It’s also funny how they seem to develop a certain form of amnesia as regards customs, cultures and religious beliefs that openly discriminate against people on the basis of their race, sex and sexual preference.
I’ve met some great Muslims, for instance. People I would trust with my life and people who prove a valued and respect service to the NHS. I’ve also met Muslims who hate people of a different faith, to the extent they will use violence and threats in order exert influence, especially towards females. Some of these people have worked and continue to work in the health service. They’re not dealt with because to do so would expose them for what they are and also expose the double standards that exist within the service. So it’s just easier I guess to focus on the easier targets..the targets they can bully, isolate and coerce.
Such is the extent of this double standard that it is no longer hidden, but overt. Take the following example, in which the author, apparently using the shield of ‘minority’ status, is overtly spiteful, bitter and racist against every single person on the face of this planet born white..
https://metro.co.uk/2017/10/25/dear-white-people-youre-never-discriminated-against-so-shut-up-7026332/
That’s right. She accuses all white people of being over 300 years old, and of knowing them personally including what they think. Do you think she’d be refused service? Think again. Despite the torrent of criticism these operatives receive their content remains and yet if the tables were turned I can guarantee that the person responsible for such views would probably be out of a job and in a police station before the week’s out.
These are also the same operatives deliberately conflating trolling with hate. Conflating peaceful, family protesters all protesting on principle alone, of being “far-right” and “extreme”. NONE of this is by mistake. These operatives do have an agenda, and they are the parties responsible for causing most of the division in this country.
Furthermore when challenged these operatives appear to rage, or simply run like rats from a sinking ship..the ship being their own absurd, narcissistic tantrum wrapped up as legitimate retort. It is not. It is there fore a purpose, with a specific target: young, and gullible.
Want to see their latest attempt to drag society down in line with their rancid agenda? Look at how they cover and respond to the following…look at their bias, their refusal to clarify. Like dogs rolling in their own filth, angry at the world for refusing do the same, these people cannot tolerate question and they cannot tolerate being exposed for what they are doing..
https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/10/muslim-women-fear-safety-boris-johnson-scraps-islamophobia-inquiry-11075651/
Again, please consider who this is aimed at. People who are young, people who are incapable of critical thought. The term “slamophobia” is at best an ambiguous term (as many academics attest), hence this policy was bound to fail from the state – not a SINGLE mention of this. And “anti-Muslim racism”? Islam isn’t even a race. There’s also not a single mention of the fact there are already laws in place but hey, this isn’t about that is it? This is about shutting people up. You God-damn hypocrites.
It’s crystal clear to see the intent: conflating mere criticism with trolling = hate = extremism = we’ll come after you and deny you your inalienable rights; we’ll crucify your personal and work life and turn a veritable army of useful idiots upon you at each and every single opportunity.
Lest we forget? Damn straight. I think Hitler would be most proud of what these entities are achieving.’The ability to think for yourself is the terrorism of the next decade.’
Frank Anderson says
We agree almost entirely (99.99%). I suggest that an alternative to young people being incapable of critical thought, they have NEVER been permitted outside to home to exercise critical thought. While at “institutions of learning” all the way through their grades depend on a teacher’s appraisal. Any disagreement with a teacher is fatal to a grade point average which determines the student’s future opportunities. But at home, a “child” can threaten a parent with reporting if the parent dares to challenge the child’s indoctrination. That was true under Nazism, Communism and now. All a child has to do is accuse a parent of abuse and the parent is charged and convicted on nothing more. Whether such training (brainwashing) is by a custodial parent in a divorce aftermath or a tyrannical government imposing its will on future generations, the result is the same: Mindless, ungrateful robots ready to destroy everything a family should represent. And with the end of the loyal and committed family goes the end of a law-abiding society. Having seen such “weaponized” children they are truly terrifying. Bringing children into the world should not translate “ipso facto” into bringing masters to enslave parents, but it does every day. Well done.
gravenimage says
Good post, Ber5.
I don’t think I’ve sen you here before. If you are new to Jihad Watch, welcome!