“The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), is calling on Amazon, Google and Barnes and Noble, including the companies of Audible and Kindle, to remove ‘all white supremacist and pro-confederate digital audio books and related social media ads.'”
One wonders who will be arbiter in determining where the line is drawn in determining what is “white supremacist” material. Already CAIR has positioned itself as judge, and few in the establishment media pay attention to its links to Hamas. Few note that its definition of what is “white supremacist” is extremely broad.
The logic of CAIR’s demand is outrageous. A first priority should be that Islamic supremacist preaching and literature be removed from all mosques, Islamic centers, and madrassas; after that, every Islamic group associated with Hamas and other jihad terror organizations should be banned, including CAIR.
Regnery Publishing President Marji Ross accused CAIR of an “insidious and dishonest smear campaign”….
“Regnery strenuously objects to the insidious and dishonest smear campaign being waged by CAIR against our author, our book, and millions of Americans,” she said in a statement. “Conflating ‘white supremacy’ with ‘confederate’ is a loathsome and despicable tactic, used to discredit and slander anyone who dares to voice support for the South or the ideals of liberty and self-determination embraced by so many patriots during the Civil War and ever since.”
Those who support the freedom of speech — including leaders from both the public and private sectors — need to organize better in opposing CAIR and other groups connected to jihad terror. Otherwise such groups will continue to grow more emboldened and increase their influence. The issue of Islamic supremacism is a serious one that threatens the freedom of Western nations. That CAIR could so brazenly suggest that major retailers “pull white supremacist and pro-confederate materials from their websites,” especially given the dirt in its own backyard, is a demonstration of just how far the West has descended to in enabling such groups.
As for the Southern Poverty Law Center, which routinely backs CAIR and vice versa (since like supports like):
CAIR said The Southern Poverty Law Center indicates that the book “was a key inspiration for Timothy McVeigh’s 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.”
McVeigh only has himself to blame. He was following no group and could point to no doctrine that backed his behavior. Jihadists can and do. The disgraced SPLC also has no credibility, any more than CAIR does. It has a “systemic culture of racism and sexism” within its own ranks, and long ago lost its way.
“Group calls on Amazon, Google to remove ‘white supremacist, pro-Confederate’ materials,” Fox 17, December 11, 2019:
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WZTV) — A group is calling on major retailers to pull white supremacist and pro-confederate materials from their websites.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), is calling on Amazon, Google and Barnes and Noble, including the companies of Audible and Kindle, to remove “all white supremacist and pro-confederate digital audio books and related social media ads.”
CAIR said it found the companies selling books like “The South was Right,” “The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War” and “The Turner Diaries,” a neo-Nazi “recruitment novel.” CAIR said these novels promote white supremacy.
“It is inexcusable for internet retailers like Amazon, Google, Audio Books, and Barnes and Noble to profit from the mainstreaming of White supremacist historical revisionism that celebrates the treason of the Confederacy and excuses the abomination of slavery,” said CAIR Director of Government Affairs Robert S. McCaw. “Amazon, Google, Audio Books, and Barnes and Noble should immediately remove all white supremacist and pro-Confederacy digital audio books and related social media ads.”….
“Regnery Publishing accuses CAIR of ‘smear campaign’ for effort to ban book on Confederacy,” by Valerie Richardson, Washington Times, December 11, 2019:
“The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War” may not appear on everyone’s Christmas list, but an effort by the Council for American-Islamic Relations to ban the book has met with resistance from the publisher and author.
Regnery Publishing President Marji Ross accused CAIR of an “insidious and dishonest smear campaign” after the liberal advocacy group called on Amazon, Google, and Barnes & Noble to stop carrying certain “pro-Confederate and white supremacist” titles.
“Regnery strenuously objects to the insidious and dishonest smear campaign being waged by CAIR against our author, our book, and millions of Americans,” she said in a statement. “Conflating ‘white supremacy’ with ‘confederate’ is a loathsome and despicable tactic, used to discredit and slander anyone who dares to voice support for the South or the ideals of liberty and self-determination embraced by so many patriots during the Civil War and ever since.”
In its campaign launched Monday, CAIR also singled out the 2011 non-fiction book “The South Was Right!” as well as “The Turner Diaries,” the notoriously racist and anti-Semitic 1978 novel about the violent overthrow of the U.S. government credited with inspiring the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
Robert McCaw, CAIR director of government affairs, called it “inexcusable for internet retailers like Amazon, Google, Audio Books, and Barnes and Noble to profit from the mainstreaming of white supremacist historical revisionism that celebrates the treason of the Confederacy and excuses the abomination of slavery.”
The retailers “should immediately remove all white supremacist and pro-Confederacy digital audio books and related social media ads,” he said in a press release….
Certainly there is no love lost between Regnery and CAIR. In her statement, Ms. Ross called it “ironic” that CAIR would mount such an effort.
“It is particularly ironic that CAIR is behind this campaign, given the absurd hypocrisy of an organization which is dedicated to promoting misogyny, anti-Semitism, and Islamo-supremacy feigning concern for human rights, inclusiveness, justice or civil liberties,” she said. “We encourage anyone who seeks to know the truth to check Sharia law on questions of rights for women, Jews, gays, or any other non-Muslim minority and get back to us on who really believes in liberty and justice for all.”
Mr. McCaw responded with a blast at Regnery: “The publisher’s bigoted and hysterical response to our criticism of white supremacy and the Confederacy shows exactly why no mainstream corporation should sell its hateful and ahistorical books. Just as Amazon, Google and Barnes & Noble do not sell propaganda that celebrates Nazism, they should not sell books that celebrate and whitewash the racist traitors of the Confederacy.”
Among the books in the popular Regnery series is “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)” by Robert Spencer, founder of the Jihad Watch blog.
“It is a troubling sign of the times to witness the cognitive dissonance of a publisher like Regnery who defends the Confederacy’s traitorous effort to destroy our nation and to enshrine slavery as a national institution,” Mr. McCaw said. “But that should not be surprising since Regnery publishes Islamophobic authors like Robert Spencer and smears the Islamic faith of millions of Americans.”…
Staci says
cair has some cahoonies for sure; where is their brain though? we all know the answer to that. amazon had better not cave to these jerks who want to control everything, period.
cair AND mb should be declared terrorist organizations as that is what they are.
Saudi Arabia should never get a permit to build another mosque; we have more than enough of them. They are only used to grow more terrorists and take over all levels of government.
wake up people
Herb says
Their Allah has a Muslim white suptemisist prophet, Muhammad and th MB doesn’t want another uprising against them.
william carr says
WiIl they also remove all Islamic supremacist material? Which is all qurans to be clear
Anjuli Pandavar says
Who the f*ck are these people to tell Americans what their history should be?!
revereridesagain says
Fine. Can we go to their countries and remove all symbols of Islamic supremacy, violence, oppression, anti-Semitism and jihad?
Lu says
Excellent point. But even more resistance to this effort: the 1st guarantees that these materials etc. should be protected from censorship. So this is primarily attack on our First, the said websites are American companies.
Kesselman says
Most strinking is the fact that a proven fifth column enemy entity as the notorious CAIR is still operating in North America. Its linked to Hamas is in itself criminal due to the organization’s terrorist label.
Go after CAIR legally: money laundering, money transferring, revenue fraud, physical threats to opposers, hiding of illegals and subsequently hand out of false legitimations.
Is it thinkable, that Nazi operators during WW2 could establish a permanent base in heartland U.S.A.?
mortimer says
Agree with Kesselman: CAIR is an obvious fifth column and well-known front of the Muslim Brotherhood … which is a terrorist organization.
By the way, comparing the MB to fascism is also accurate. The MB is an offshoot of Italian and German fascism. The MB could with some fairness be called the Egyptian version of the Nazi Party.
Krankus says
That has been going on here in the UK for years.
ItsJo says
Excellent post and true. We are being OVERRUN with all the Islamic Agenda, and they HAVE infiltrated our Congress….Omar comes to mind, as that corrupt
thing, should be up on charges of “raising money for Cair FOR Hamas, a Terrorist Group. Just WHY is she STILL in our Congress with her Obvious Violence Towards Americans and this Republic? We are getting VERY TIRED of the ‘Corruption of Democrats in our Gov’t who have given a green light to ALL that is Threatening to OUR REPUBLIC. She for one, has embezzled money, given it to her latest ‘lover’ and violated Other Campaign Finance Laws, so WHY are NO CHARGES/HER REMOVAL NOT ALREADY BEING EXECUTED AGAINST HER???
mortimer says
Let’s go to Muslim countries and demand that all monuments, tombs or statues in honor of Muslim warriors be removed.
Del says
Almost impossible because Muslims hate statues. They offend alla or mohamed or somebody. It’s amazing that the average street level muzzie knows alla’s opinion on so many things or what exactly offends mohamed this minute.
Islam offends me so it obviously should be banned. The koran clearly meets the definition of hate literature.
Barros Serrano says
Things cannot be banned simply because they offend you, or me for that matter.
Much of Islamic orgs and activities are indeed terrorist oriented, and so are problematic, true enough.
Of course what is going on in many Christian churches these days would also qualify. Looking at history, I find that Christianity and Islam are in close competition for the most bloody and brutal religion.
SteveA56 says
One thing is certain from this story:- CAIR is an organization with absolutely no respect or CARE for truth and accuracy in their pernicious and vile smear campaign against their betters.
mortimer says
Well expressed! “It is particularly ironic that CAIR is behind this campaign, given the absurd hypocrisy of an organization which is dedicated to promoting misogyny, anti-Semitism, and Islamo-supremacy feigning concern for human rights, inclusiveness, justice or civil liberties,”
CAIR appeals to ‘human rights’ so that in future they will have no blowback from any writers when they TAKE AWAY human rights.
The first requirement of tyrants is to suppress the freedom of expression.
Herb says
Muslims support slavery. So where do they get off telling us to remove our History. Hey all Muslims out of America. And take the Masons with them.
mortimer says
The pot calling the kettle black. Islam produced the world’s all-time biggest and most vicious slave trade, causing the deaths of 120 million black Africans.
Islam means ‘submission’ or ‘pacification’. No one is as submitted as a slave. ‘Islam’ is thus a euphemism for ‘slavery’.
Infidel says
Precisely, since Islam is itself an elaborately codified vehicle for Arab racism and supremacy. So CAIR has problems w/ any Whites considering themselves supreme.
Chaz says
I want the gov’t to declare CAIR, the terriost org. that it is.
PRCS says
Far better, IMO, for our government to conduct an honest, national conversation concerning which aspects of Islamic law are antithetical to and incompatible with U.S,law.
Islam–the ummah’s ‘complete way of life’ can’t be banned.
But it can and must be exposed for what it is: a brutal, intolerant theocracy with the stated goal of world domination.
Qur’an 8:39
And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah . And if they cease – then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.
Nothing in Qur’an limits that ‘fighting’ to the Middle East.
James Lincoln says
In the feature article, CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS states:
“A first priority should be that Islamic supremacist preaching and literature be removed from all mosques, Islamic centers, and madrassas; after that, every Islamic group associated with Hamas and other jihad terror organizations should be banned, including CAIR.”
100% agree.
Pres. Trump should make this a TOP priority after his reelection in 2020.
ItsJo says
Agree w/your post 100%……Let’s hope that POTUS Trump DOES EXACTLY WHAT YOU WROTE. We Americans have had Enough of this Scum, who Only looks to Take Over America, and it is Happening Now.
PRCS says
As it pertains to slavery:
“Robert McCaw, CAIR director of government affairs, called it “inexcusable for internet retailers like Amazon, Google, Audio Books, and Barnes and Noble to profit from the mainstreaming of white supremacist historical revisionism that celebrates the treason of the Confederacy and excuses the abomination of slavery.””
Whether realizing it or not, EVERY Muslim woman who either wears hijab–or is forced to do so by other Muslims–is complying with a 1400 year old, man made ‘Holy book’ which quite clearly allows their slaves to see them without it.
Qur’an 24:31 And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.
So, how about that, Nihad? Is that ‘Allah’s’ literal, infallible word–valid ’til the end of time–or not?
Will Regnery Publishing include that in their push back?
I hope they will.
Pet Charles says
I find it fascinating that Islam was not even in America when the civil war was fought, and that it is an Arab financed organization–not a Black organization–that is crying “White supremacy”. Yet, a cursory inspection of any majority non Black Islamic nation would show that Blacks are treated horribly. CAIR has no standing whatsoever to even mention “White supremacy”.
gravenimage says
+1
FAST EDDIE says
Yeah, I can go for that but as far I’m concerned CAIR can keep their nose out of everything and blow away in the wind.
Infidel says
Right, CAIR! The only supremacy that is okay is Arab supremacy – and maybe Turkish. Other than that, no other supremacy should be tolerated.
As Anjuli noted above, how is it CAIR’s business whether any groups of Americans admire the Confederacy or not?
PRCS says
As Anjuli noted above, how is it CAIR’s business whether any groups of Americans admire the Confederacy or not?
Because they are thrive on the idiocy of their useful idiots.
They ‘defend’ things Muhammad and his sock-puppet ‘Allah’ prohibit:
Homosexuality (gay rights)
Synagogue shootings (Jews)
Etc.
Heidi says
But slavery is authorized by the Quran so they should look at themselves first. When are they going to start burning books? I have the feeling that they are not just copying the Nazis but are trying to surpass them.
PRCS says
See Qur’an 24:31
https://quran.com/24/31
not expose their ‘adornment’ except to…that which their right hands possess (slaves)…
The Yezidis know what that’s all about.
gravenimage says
So true. There is nothing anti-slavery in Islam.
PRCS says
While the ISIS ‘fighters’ make clear (“what your right hands have possessed” and “which has been ordained”), Clueless Don and his ‘Terrorism Expert’ never address that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0Un9Av6HMo
gravenimage says
Thanks for that terrible link.
Or Else! says
CAIR. Council on American-Islamic Relations. There’s your first clue, lefties.
“American” is a national term. “Islamic” is supposedly a religious term, in the left’s mind. Not simply a religion, but an oppressed religion of peace. Why does a peaceful religion need to have a relations council with a nation?
Is there a Council on American-Jewish Relations? American-Christian Relations? American-Hindu Relations? Why not? Because American Hindus, Jews, and Christians consider themselves to be Americans–happy to live under the law of the Constitution and practice their religions peacefully.
Islam, however, is not just a religion. It is also a theocratic, supremacist, political ideology that doesn’t consider itself American….mainly because the Constitution isn’t Shari’ah compliant. Hence the need for a relations council…so it can continue to politicize its bogus victimhood.
Or Else! says
I should add that Muhammad’s Islam will never consider itself to be ANY nationality other than their hegemonic Ummah. Hence the need for “relations councils” in any country not ruled by its Shari’ah.
Try opening a Council on Islamic-Christian Relations in Riyadh.
James Lincoln says
+1
Infidel says
You mean ‘Council on Saudi-Christian Relations’
Or Else! says
Right, that’s exactly what I meant! Thanks! (Wish we could edit here, ha!)
OREN WYSOCKI says
Legalize white identity, to end A cruel and racist discrimination.
As far as the confederate flag goes, the truth of the matter is that it was the north that was acting undemocratically, they were violating the fundamental principals of the constitution and the nation. Although jon stewart might semi joke that the civil war settled the matter about states rights, the champions of ‘authoritarianism’ never actually had the courage to say they don’t care about the constitution, they consider it overruled since the civil war, and they even passed A constitutional amendment granting black americans rights immediately after the civil war, because they were scared at how little influence they would have among the American people without claims to fair laws, written in documents agreed to by all. The economic consequences of openly stating support for Satanic laws and principals would turn the entire world against them, so liars and deceivers they chose to remain.
There are basically no white americans who desire to reimplement slavery today. So for the most part the confederate flag is A symbol of white southerners desire to have their identity, conflicting with the Satanic left that desires that everything that helps black people to be submitted to, because everything is ok to sacrifice in the service of pursuing racial equality, and that blacks who are now so violent and insecure about being criticized, along with leftists who can’t stand to hear anyone disagree with their goals, since they take any disagreement with their fanaticism as evidence of racism, especially by whites and Jews. It is true that many whites fighting for the confederate flag are fighting for white peoples right to be racist, but the reality of white peoples aspirations are far less racist than black people and leftist today.
For example, white men walking through black neighborhoods today can expect to be violently attacked at A higher level and greater ferocity than white people would desire to inflict on black people. White people would simply want to form neighborhoods where they kept black people out so they could be safe and protect themselves from black violence, racism and crime.
Black people want to be able to redistribute as much of white peoples wealth as they are possibly able. White people today do not have an immoral position towards black peoples wealth in any great degree. They don’t want the black peoples money, they don’t want to steal their labor. It is true that the cost of living compared to what black people can achieve is out of balance, and from that perspective merit is not moral either, but who is the most hysterical and violent opposition to that conversation happening? It’s the left and the black people.
White people do not want to infringe on black peoples free speech or leftist’s, nor their freedom of association, nor their right to representation by their own people or someone who they chose from another people. Blacks and leftists may make tv shows that represent their views, comedy acts that entertain them, they may chose to educate their children as they wish as long as they are not teaching them to be violent against others, they are welcome to date who they wish and are welcome to teach their children to marry other black people, or to date people of every race, they can work with who they wish, they can celebrate their love for their own people, and even declare their peoples good attributes that are better than all other peoples.
The left and most black people do not believe that whites or Jews should have any of those rights, none of those freedoms, they are willing to violate all universal principals, because they only want for themselves to be allowed to say and do things as they wish, while specifically forbidding white people and Jews from even existing. They do not like the existence of white countries, they do not agree to white people having A white identity, they see statues of white men as bad, they believe that blacks, nonwhites and leftists should be allowed to make immigration policy, but white people should not, unless they are supportive of A black or latino takeover of the nation. Black, latino and muslim nations can have closed borders, that is ok, their laws are anti white and anti Israeli only. Islamic nations can call themselves Islamic nations, but Christian and Jewish nations cannot call themselves Christian or Jewish nations. They are racist, and they are allowed to say anything they want according to the pro fascist globalists and the left, so they can call white people and Jews racists, when they are advocating for the racial oppression of Jews and whites for the happiness of the blacks, muslims, latinos and leftists. They are racist oppressors, who do not agree to any human rights laws, international law, or any other spoken or claimed policies, because if they were to state the truth, they know that most white people and Jews would reject them and they would oppose their policies openly. In G-d I trust.
gravenimage says
No, our ending slavery was *not* “acting undemocratically”.
John Lloyd Scharf says
The Confederacy rejected the Federalist tyranny. Even US Grant owned slaves until the 13th Amendment was approved. The Federalists violated the informed consent of 13 States by forcing them back into the Federalist Government. The US started as a confederacy, like Switzerland, under the Articles of Confederation long before the Constitution. It is naive to suggest it was JUST about slavery or had anything to do with before Lincoln freed ONLY the slaves in the Confederacy – illegally.
It is uncivilized to violate the informed consent of anyone, but Lincoln enslaved ALL with the conscription of citizens involuntarily for war. Now we are all free range slaves.
No one should be enslaved, “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.”
Did slavery end with the 13th Amendment? NO. You have a right to be a slave to the government. You can be conscripted for military, jury duty, road work, and any other governmental service.
Butler v. Perry – 240 U.S. 328 (1916) upheld a Florida law that required men to work without pay for six days every year on roads and bridges. Failure to answer a road work summons was a criminal offense.
J.W. Butler was jailed for 30 days after he ignored this duty and failed to make an alternate arrangement. It was involuntary servitude, but because of the powers granted government, it was held the 13th Amendment did not apply.
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/328/case.html
gravenimage says
John Lloyd Scharf wrote:
The Confederacy rejected the Federalist tyranny.
…………………………..
The idea that not being able to own human beings is “tyranny” is grotesque.
More:
Even US Grant owned slaves until the 13th Amendment was approved.
…………………………..
This is mistaken at best, a lie at worst. Grant did in fact own a man named William Jones for about a year on the eve of the Civil War, but he freed the man before the start of the war. The 13th Amendment was not passed until 1865, at the end of the Civil War.
More:
The Federalists violated the informed consent of 13 States by forcing them back into the Federalist Government. The US started as a confederacy, like Switzerland, under the Articles of Confederation long before the Constitution. It is naive to suggest it was JUST about slavery or had anything to do with before Lincoln freed ONLY the slaves in the Confederacy – illegally.
It is uncivilized to violate the informed consent of anyone, but Lincoln enslaved ALL with the conscription of citizens involuntarily for war. Now we are all free range slaves.
…………………………..
Conscription during war is not slavery, as this vile poster pretends. In that case, being drafted to fight in WWII would be no better than Fascism and its death camps–which is likely what John Lloyd Scharf thinks.
More:
No one should be enslaved, “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.”
Did slavery end with the 13th Amendment? NO. You have a right to be a slave to the government. You can be conscripted for military, jury duty, road work, and any other governmental service…
…………………………..
According to this, there has never been a democracy in the history of the world, and serving jury duty is no better than being a sex slave. Grotesque.
Rich Cole says
Sorry charlie, this is our history. We will not give in to your request. 600,000 of our countrymen died fighting in our Civil War. The battle flags of both the north and the south are part of our country’s history.
gravenimage says
+1
livingengine says
CAIR’s claim of “solidarity” with Jews isn’t worth a damn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPdleHa58G8
gravenimage says
CAIR calls on Amazon, Google to remove all “white supremacist, pro-Confederate” materials
One wonders who will be arbiter in determining where the line is drawn in determining what is “white supremacist” material.
……………….
Damn good question. My guess is that any opposition to the horrors of Islam will be considered “white supremacist”.
Battle says
OREN WYSOCKI: +1000
Battle says
Christine Douglas Williams hits nail on head.
Battle says
Regnery should sue CAIR for libel.
Lydia Church says
And CAIR is calling the shots because…. remind us why again?
Oh yeah, the intended islamic goal of global takeover, how could we forget?!
Savvy Kafir says
“… smears the Islamic faith of millions of Americans.”
No one should be able to say those words without choking on them. This very idea is disgusting. Islam is directly opposed to EVERY ideal America was founded upon. Muslims have no right to call themselves Americans. It’s really one or the other. And many Muslims living in the U.S. are perfectly aware of this, and consider themselves Muslims first & foremost — Muslims who are here to help turn America into an Islamic society.
Charles says
It surprises me that they vehemently denounce slavery and all symbolism of its existence, when Muhammad himself was an enslaver, traded slaves, including the time he traded 2 black African slaves for an Arab slave who had converted to Islam.
James Lincoln says
Charles,
If they ever really thought about it, the cognitive dissonance would be unbearable.
gravenimage says
Muslims are not anti-slavery–being “anti-Confederacy” just suits their agenda right now.
random walk says
A group that has been a slaver nation / movement / ummah since it began its warfare in the 600’s and killed hundreds of millions and enslaved band killed more black Africans that have ever traveled or lived in the US, attacks a nation e that existed less than 5 years. And I am sure that most of the slaves owned in the USA were bought from Islam.
Islam is a Crime Against Humanity, and must be treated as that.
OLD GUY says
Say NO to the CAIR they do not have the right to block freedom of speech or expression of any individual in this country. No islamic take over of this country!
Les says
Oh the irony…
The bumboys and paedophiles book the ‘Qur’an’ promotes Islamic supremacy.
Fletcher Smith says
When is enough white man and woman?the left and coloreds have taken everything from us. time to fight for what’s OURS!
Tay says
In the UK many Bible street preachers have been told to move along, because Muslim passing by’s have called police and complained of being offended.
One black fella who had been preaching the Bible in the same spot for many many years, was arrested because he refused to stop preaching and move along. And those who called the police to complain of being offended, were a group of Muslims who had recently set up a stall promoting Islamic hate material.
So to be honest, it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if Amazon, Google, etc… DID remove what is deemed to be white supremacy material from their websites.
Personally, I feel the only material which is worthy of being banned is the Quran itself
gravenimage says
Appalling, Tay.