• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

India: Muslim husband divorces wife three times, she is raped by another man so husband can remarry her

Dec 14, 2019 5:00 pm By Robert Spencer

Nikah halala is one of the most bizarre aspects of Islamic law. It is a temporary marriage that allows a woman to return to her previous husband after a divorce. If her husband says “I divorce you” to her three times, she can’t return to him unless and until she marries another man, consummates the marriage, and is in turn divorced by the new husband. This is based on the Qur’an. Allah’s regulations for divorce emphasize regarding women that “men have a degree over them” (Qur’an 2:228). This may be why men can divorce their wives simply by saying, “Talaq” — You are divorced, or I divorce you. Such an easy procedure leads to divorces in a fit of pique, followed by reconciliation — and the Qur’an anticipates this and attempts to head it off by stipulating that a husband who divorces his wife three times cannot reconcile with her until she marries another man and is in turn divorced by him: “And if he has divorced her [for the third time], then she is not lawful to him afterward until she marries a husband other than him” (Qur’an 2:230).

“Woman Given Triple Talaq, Raped By Man Who Was Part Of Wedding: Cops,” Press Trust of India, December 12, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Bhopal: A 21-year-old woman was allegedly given triple talaq, and subsequently raped by a ‘tantrik’ citing the custom of ‘Nikah Halala’ when her husband wished to remarry her, the police said here on Thursday.

The woman’s husband and the tantrik (witch-doctor) who allegedly raped her were arrested on Wednesday, Bhopal police said.

According to the woman, her husband (name not disclosed to protect her identity) divorced her by giving her triple talaq — which is now illegal — on November 23 after the couple had a fight.

The husband later had a change of heart and wished to remarry her, said Jahangirabad City Superintendent of Police (CSP) Abdul Aleem Khan.

Anwar Baba (50), who was the woman’s ”nikahi baap” (one who offers the bride’s hand to the groom during the wedding), told the couple that if they wished to remarry, the woman will have to first marry someone else, consummate the marriage and then remarry her first husband as per the custom of Nikah Halala.

Baba, who is a tantrik, then allegedly took the victim to his flat in Ashbagh area and raped her….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, India, sexual assault and rape, Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Abdul Aleem Khan, Bhopal, Jahangirabad, nikah halala, tantrik, Triple talaq


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. DHazard says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 5:09 pm

    Another “only in Islam” moment.

    • barbaracvm1 says

      Dec 14, 2019 at 5:17 pm

      Sick B@sturds Women are worth less than nothing. I hope she finds some who treats her with dignity.

      • william carr says

        Dec 15, 2019 at 6:03 am

        Intolerant
        Sexist
        Lazy
        Aggressive
        Men

        Mainly
        Uneducated
        Sexist
        Lazy
        Intolerant
        Men

        • Daphne says

          Dec 15, 2019 at 6:17 am

          Yet the femmo nazis claim Islam is a beautiful peaceful religion.

  2. Infidel says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 5:43 pm

    And in India, the secular opposition is furious that India’s new Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) excludes Muslims from the people from Pakistan/Afghanistan/Bangladesh from those who may become Indian citizens, and has started rioting in several states.

    Modi should enact emergency powers in the affected states and crack down hard on the pro-Muslim opposition. Enough is enough!

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 14, 2019 at 7:14 pm

      Yes–this act would go from helping Infidels trapped in Dar-al-Islam to just allowing more Jihadists to flood into India if this were amended to include Muslims. I hope Modi stands tough.

      • Infidel says

        Dec 14, 2019 at 7:42 pm

        Amit Shah or Narendra Modi need to articulate exactly what you stated here!!! Aside from what you point out, if India allows Muslims from those 3 Muslim countries to come in, it totally defeats the purpose of those countries existing in the first place. (Which is the point secular Indian parties have always wanted to make, while totally ignoring the incompatibility b/w Muslims and everyone else)

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 14, 2019 at 11:00 pm

          Spot on, Infidel.

        • william carr says

          Dec 15, 2019 at 6:11 am

          Incorrect. Afghanistan is a country of long history. Pakistan and Bangladesh (originally
          East Pakistan) were created specially for Muslims at the time of Indian Independence
          in 1947. As such Pakistan should be a paradigm of a modern Islamic state, which of course it is not with military rule in the past and assassinations at all levels of society

        • Infidel says

          Dec 15, 2019 at 7:34 am

          Yeah, Afghanistan does have a longer history than Pakistan – by about just 200 years. It didn’t become a single country until the 1700s. In pre-Islamic times, it was split b/w Indian and Persian empires. The northern and western parts of the country were a part of Persian empires: Balkh was where Zoroaster – the founder of Zoroastrianism, the pre-Islamic religion of Iran – was born and raised. Whereas the Gandhara region – today’s Kabul, Jalalabad, et al – was an extension of India, under Saka and Kushan empires, and predominantly Buddhist.

          During Islamic times too, there wasn’t an entity called Afghanistan – just like there was no Palestine. Under the Samanids, Western Afghanistan – Herat, Balkh – were a part of the Iranian empire while it islamized, while Gandhara was under its final Buddhist rulers. Then came the Ghaznavids, but they had an empire that far exceeded Afghanistan – it extended to Turkistan and India. Then it was a part of the Qhwarezmid, Chagatai and finally the Timuride empires, so never really a national entity in its own right. Under the Mughals, it was very much a part of India, and only came into its own after Nader Shah’s invasion of India and plundering Delhi.

          So yeah, if there weren’t a Pakistan or Bangladesh, Afghanistan would still be a separate country from India. However, chances are that India would still take Sikh and Christian (there ain’t too many Buddhist or Hindus there: Hindus were pretty much wiped out in the 19th century in Kafirstan, which got renamed Nuristan after it got islamized).

  3. keya says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 6:19 pm

    There is no dignity for women in Islam

  4. PRCS says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 6:27 pm

    And anyone who thinks that only happens — over there — is fooling themselves.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 14, 2019 at 7:20 pm

      Yes–I’m sure this has happened here in the West. Few of the victims would report it.

    • Infidel says

      Dec 15, 2019 at 7:59 am

      One thing that Muslims are very good at is intimidating their victims into staying silent about their crimes. Jeffrey Epstein would have nothing on them

  5. gravenimage says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 7:10 pm

    India: Muslim husband divorces wife three times, she is raped by another man so husband can remarry her
    …………………..

    Yes, this is what Islam teaches. What a sick creed.

    I’m glad this case is being handled criminally, because this is India. Over the border in Pakistan or Bangladesh and this poor young woman would likely have no recourse.

    • J D.S says

      Dec 15, 2019 at 9:01 am

      Just more and more stupidity in islam……Will the SANE world ever wake up and rebuke Islam as a FAKE religion?….DOUBTFUL!

  6. jap says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 7:12 pm

    Another fine example of how modern and progressive Islam is. In the 13th or 14th century this might have been acceptable, but not in the 21st century.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 14, 2019 at 7:21 pm

      This would always have been evil.

  7. Battle says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 7:45 pm

    For India and all other nations:

    Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women. Blessed is the fruit of thy womb Jesus. Holy Mary, mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.

  8. Joel says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 10:03 pm

    The infinite wisdom of Mohammad and Allah—- NOT!

  9. Mo says

    Dec 14, 2019 at 10:04 pm

    Who thinks up such a thing?! What a truly sick, twisted, evil, demonic “religion” this is. Straight from the pits of hell!

  10. sidney penny says

    Dec 15, 2019 at 6:05 am

    “According to the woman, her husband (name not disclosed to protect her identity) divorced her by giving her triple talaq — which is now illegal — on November 23 after the couple had a fight.”

    Yes, there is a new law in India that has made it illegal.

    “The new legislation which makes the practice of instant divorce through ‘triple talaq’ among Muslims a punishable offence with 3-year imprisonment was challenged in the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court on Friday.

    The petition in the apex court was moved by a Kerala-based Muslim organisation, while the one in the Delhi High Court was filed by an advocate — both alleging that ‘The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019′ violates the fundamental rights of Muslim husbands.”

    You would think that a court would not have to decide this and that all muslims in India would want this law passed.There is something wrong with India’ s parliament (Rajya Sabha) when it is passed very narrowly by 99 to 84.Who are the member who voted against the bill and why?

    • Infidel says

      Dec 15, 2019 at 7:53 am

      There is something wrong with India’ s parliament (Rajya Sabha) when it is passed very narrowly by 99 to 84.Who are the member who voted against the bill and why?

      Oh, every secular opposition party opposed to the NDA – the BJP led alliance. Their upper house members are elected by state legislators, and although it has an overwhelming majority in the lower house where people directly elected it, the BJP doesn’t control all state governments. So the states that are run by the opposition – they send their representatives to the Rajya Sabha. (It would be akin to US state legislators electing senators, instead of the people directly doing it).

      The why is simple. Take the Congress (and other parties ain’t much different). Since they had a Nehruvian utopian attitude that Pakistan was illogically created, they made it a point to pander to Muslims to prove that they have it better in India than in Pakistan. In every state, they’d create voting coalitions of Muslims and certain castes of Hindus to pull off state, and ultimately national elections. In foreign policy, they’d make it a point to support the Arabs over Israel. In Bengal, they competed w/ the Marxists for Muslim support, and so supported an open border w/ Bangladesh where not just Hindu and Buddhists, but Muslims could come in as well. Just like the Dems are opposed to an end to illegal immigration b’cos that would disrupt their plans to replace US voters, whom they’ve written off, w/ alien voters, the Leftists and Congress had been competing, but are now in an alliance in that state to protect their voters. They want Muslims to be continued to be allowed in so that it’ll improve their election prospects. Never mind that West Bengal has been demographically altered to 40% Muslim.

      The BJP was the first party to consolidate the Hindu vote, since they didn’t have Muslim support and therefore had to have a united Hindu vote, as opposed to a caste based coalition w/ Muslims that their secular opponents had. So they are addressing illegal immigration from Bangalstan and had put together the NRC, which would have to separate out illegal aliens from citizens. But that also risks deporting non-Muslim refugees from Bangladesh who were being persecuted not by the Bangladesh government, which is still secular, but by Bangladesh Muslims, who are as fanatical as other Muslims. That’s why the CAA was enacted, so that non-Muslims would legally have a pathway to citizenship, while illegal Muslims were deported. I know why the Congress and the Left are opposed to the latter, but their theoretical fantasies can’t be allowed to trump the ground reality that Muslims already have what they want in Pakistan and Bangladesh

    • Infidel says

      Dec 15, 2019 at 7:57 am

      One more thing: doing all of the above also meant that Muslims were supported in their ostensible desire for separate family laws on the grounds that it would help them preserve their separate identity. Essentially, in India, shariah law was there for Muslims who wanted it, until the BJP ended it.

  11. sidney penny says

    Dec 15, 2019 at 6:10 am

    Too many Muslims from Bangladesh have come into India illegally .They cannot prove that they were in India at a particular time.

    • Infidel says

      Dec 15, 2019 at 7:54 am

      Hence the National Citizenship Registry combined w/ the Citizenship Amendment Act to fix all that

  12. OLD GUY says

    Dec 15, 2019 at 4:28 pm

    Why any women would defend the islamic religion yet alone be a willful member is beyond me.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)
  • Vladimir on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests
  • John on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Vladimir on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Linda McGuire on UK: Muslim stabs two women in Marks & Spencer, one in the neck, cops search for motive

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.