“The Citizenship Amendment Act allows for the fast-tracking of applications from religious minorities including Hindus and Sikhs from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh, but not Muslims,” says Gulf News.
“Racism”? “Islamophobia”? No. Religious minorities are persecuted in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Muslims aren’t. Why can’t India offer save haven to the persecuted? These bloody riots also illustrate why the Citizenship Amendment Act is reasonable.
“CAA protests: Don’t panic, situation under control, says Uttar Pradesh Police,” PTI, December 19, 2019:
LUCKNOW: After violence in the capital and some other parts of the state where protesters pelted stones and torched vehicles, police on Thursday evening said the situation was “under control” and there was no need for panic…
“The situation is under control and there is nothing to panic about. Those who created trouble are being identified,” Uttar Pradesh IG (Law and Order) Praveen Kumar told reporters.
Protest against #CitizenshipAct turns violent in Hazratganj. Protesters pelt stones, police resort to lathicharge.… https://t.co/VK6BDGbqTm
— TOI Lucknow News (@TOILucknow) 1576752154000
…During the protests in the city, the police post at Satkhanda was set afire and another in Madeyganj damaged.
Media vans and other vehicles were targeted during the protests in Lucknow, mainly in its old city.
Protesters defied prohibitory orders and hurled stones at the police at scattered places in city, triggering lathi-charges and the use of tear gas…
Apart from Lucknow, protests also turned violent in Mau and Sambhal districts.
Hindu Historian says
Typical Muslim behavior. They demand equal treatment with the groups they persecute and riot when they don’t get their way. Good for India for offering safe haven to the persecuted minorities of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh, just as the Zoroastrians fleeing the initial Islamic conquest of India found refuge in India many centuries ago (until, of course, the Muslims arrived there as well).
Hindu Historian says
Initial Islamic conquest of Persia*
DHazard says
It’s kind of racist if a Hindu does it. It’s definitely racist if a Christian does it. It’s severely racist if a Jew does it. But if a Muslim does it it’s always self defense, even when they do it first. And, by the way, Muslims can’t be terrorists or rapists either.
underbed cat says
After a extensive investigation by the Defense Dept. no Saudi threat existed or was recognized.?The the startling part, up to 850 Saudi students………getting military training. What country do I live in? I guess one that does analysis on CVE standards, maybe our President trusted the Pentagon maybe he should dig al little further,dig up the HLF documents, information that counter jihadist know…..was there foreign collusion way before that last inaguration to not speak or understand what they were dealing with and now you can see the left is keeping the lid on it, and trying to remove a president that made the comment similiar to, I don’t know but I think they hate us or want to kill us. Will he be surprised by sharia law, or the pages of the Quran, that the defense dept allowed or wrote constitutions after years of fighting for the exact reason the terrorists were fighting each other? To bring sharia law to countries in the middle east who fought against it or for it?. I think the foreign advisors who omitted the obligation to fight the kaffar or non muslims, were giddy with the results.So why were the open borders so important to the Democrats?
Muslim riots after mobilizing new act for importing Christian and Jews or non- muslim refugees.
Michael Copeland says
Doing as instructed in the mosques.
underbed cat says
You mean protecting the peaceful” version” of Islam by omission? Cinderella the Islamic Tale.
Rolf Wittwer says
..and probably most of them do sympathise with the IS-“Lifestyle”.
Every day the world becomes more and more terrible because of them.
How it will end?
sidney penny says
Since 1947 when Pakistan was created the Hindu and Sikh population has reduced from about 15 % to 4%.
Very soon there will not be Hindus and Sikhs in Bangladesh or Pakistan!
The Muslims in India will still be rioting.(like they have been doing since 1947)
Infidel says
For the sake of the people in question – Paki Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, as well as Afghan Christians and Sikhs and Bangladeshi Hindus, Buddhists and Christians – I sure hope so – that all of them manage to hightail it to India.
Years ago, I met a Bangladeshi Hindu who bemoaned the fact that Hindus fled Bangladesh, leaving people like him at the mercy of Muslims. But it’s the job of people – normal humans at least – to keep themselves alive, and if that means leaving their homes, regrettable as that is, that’s what they should do. People who remain in their home countries despite its islamization risk getting their kids converted to Islam by hook or by crook, and thereby getting the underlying reason for remaining there destroyed
Infidel says
Finally, India is cracking down, as police have arrested thousands of demonstrators who’ve demonstrated that they are incapable of demonstrating peacefully.
The other question worth asking: why are Indian Muslims rioting for the ‘right’ of Pakistani Muslims to emigrate to India, when they also claim that they are not treacherous towards India and nor do they have split loyalties? The only result of their demonstrations, if they get what they want, is Pakistanis and Afghans easily entering and staying in India. Unless it’s just the granting of refuge to non-Muslims that they are opposed to.
Oh, and India should encourage those refugees to settle in Kashmir, and dilute the Muslim population there, like China’s done in Xinxiang
b.a. freeman says
kashmir once had a significantly higher population of non-muslims, but the ummah there drove them out, as they do everywhere else on the planet. before anybody else gets thrown under the islamic bus, india would need to get kashmir in hand, and with the gang-bangers in pakistan holding nukes, that’s not a good option. sending anybody to kashmir would be condemning them to the same fate they once escaped. the refugees should be spread out across india so that no native populations are overwhelmed.
as for china, i don’t see them having a muslim problem any longer than it takes for the current crop of thugs to die of old age. if i’m not mistaken, they’re not only diluting uighur population density by sending in settlers, they’re also “re-educating” uighurs and taking their younger children away from them so that there won’t be any more muslims. it’s a monstrous solution, but one must also keep in mind that from the fascist perspective, it’s also merciful: there are not millions of people being actively murdered.
Infidel says
Yeah, much as I loathe Beijing and oppose them on everything else (Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan), the Uyghurs are one thing that I support China on. To know why, one just has to look at the fellow Turkic countries just west of them. Kyrgyzstan was the home of the Tsarnaevs, and another Jihadist who tried a car attack in Moscow just before the last ⚽️ world cup in Russia. Uzbekistan gave us Saipov. These countries are getting close w/ Turkey, which has new imperial islamic designs. Granted that the Uyghurs are suffering today, but if they ever get their independence, they’ll lash out not at Beijing, but more likely at other non-Muslim countries around them – Russia, Mongolia, India and so on
Lydia Church says
True refugees!?!?
Wa, wa, we can’t have that!
(says pope francis…)
He doesn’t want true victims of islamic persecution fleeing to other countries as refugees for safety, he wants those doing the persecuting to flee to other countries to spread their persecution against non muslims and spread their hijrah jihad attacks, violence, and tactics in new lands, those are the ‘refugees’ he wants…by golly gosh darn!
Jayell says
Perhaps this demonstrates one good reason for the partition of the Indian subcontinent into muslim and non-muslim areas. With their intolerant, malevolent supremacist creed, you’ll never get a satifactory standard of responsible democratic citizenship from muslims in mixed communities because they’ll always be incapable of respecting the rights of those who don’t share their beliefs. If it’s really necessary to attempt to tolerats muslims any number within the same territory as other groups, then some degree of mandatory separation will be essential for the safety of all. And if muslims can’t respect that, the only logical remedy is their removal to established musilm countries. Which is effectively what happened in India in 1947, and clearly should have been strictly maintained.
Jaladhi says
When Muslims were given their own land, Pakistan -” the land of the pure”, why were Muslims allowed to live in India. And a more relevant question why did these Muslims chose to live in India – hmm,.. they had the dreams of taking over India again! Mahatma Gandhi and Nehru could never understand that Islam followers could be this vile. However, this is also a lesson for the West if they can only understand this simple truth about Muslims and Islam – they will never ever live peacefully in non-Muslim land sand will always work to take over – oh no , that can’t happen!! LOL…
gravenimage says
India: Muslims throw stones and torch vehicles in riots against new law admitting non-Muslim refugees
…………..
How *dare* India try to help the victims of Islam? Bad dhimmis!
Save Europe says
I have NO doubt whatsoever, that the vastest majority of the mobs are Muslim Indians but….. there will also be a contingent of Leftist non Muslim Indian idiots who are enablers and Leftists. They exist in EVERY non Muslim land.
They need to wake up!
Mural says
I have higher hopes of Muslims becoming apostates than leftist non-muslims changing their views..
Save Europe says
Sadly, I envisage neither.
However, I wish and hope you ARE correct.
The sad truth is, is that, certainly in the West I see more demands, cries of victimhood and Hijabs being worn – coupled with non Muslim Leftists defending this.
Meanwhile, in Muslims’ own countries – especially the likes of Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia – I see Islam regressing through becoming emboldened and more confident.
Jack Holan says
Interestingly where are the riots for Barred Muslim Refugees into the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia. Iran isn’t exactly opening it’s doors wide. Any riots in these Countries on behalf of the Refugees would be met with bullets not only tear gas. Palestinians needn’t apply for status either. This is a 70 year policy.
Istvan Vogel says
All those people suffering from kuffarphobia. They need to move to an Islamic country. There’s lots of welcoming places such as Pakistan, Malaysia, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Morocco, etc
Anjuli Pandavar says
Muslims are panicking because this is a *serious* blow against jihad, especially as it sets an easy precedent that any country can follow. It is the flip-side of the coin of keeping Muslims out. Any new citizens can (should) be offered state assistance with settlement. And it is entirely at the Government’s discretion in which regions of the country the assistance applies. After all, they have their own development priorities. Those seeking to sever Kashmir from India through jihad obviously see the writing on the wall. Tough! Kashmir is *Indian* sovereign territory, not *Muslim* sovereign territory. Well done, India. And thank you! Show the world the way…
b.a. freeman says
+1
Infidel says
One thing India can do is settle all foreign non-Muslims in Kashmir, so that people in Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, et al don’t have to worry about getting their states swamped w/ Bangladeshis (of any religion)
underbed cat says
India awoke….good.