The story of Muslim self-pity and claimed victimization is here.
A Navy spokesperson says Saudi Arabian aviation students at three naval bases, including NAS Pensacola, are not allowed to fly until further notice. The Islamic community both locally and abroad says they feel a sense of unease following the deadly shooting.
The “Islamic community both locally and abroad” – that’s a lot of Muslims, about 1.5 billion – “feel a sense of unease.” Do they really? How does the reporter know this? No one in the “Islamic community” abroad is quoted in the article. Exactly two Muslims in the U.S. – Salma Ashmawi of the Islamic Center of Northwest Florida, and Wilfredo Ruiz of CAIR – are quoted in the piece. Does that claimed “sense of unease” have any basis in fact? Have any Muslims suffered because of the Pensacola killings? Any attacks? Any threats of attacks? No, no, no, and no.
The Saudi students at NAS Pensacola remain restricted from leaving the base by their Saudi commander.
“When you’re not American and just visiting, there’s that extra anxiety that comes with it. They do read and hear things that frighten them, I’m sure. They probably have a higher sense of anxiety and the FBI and base [naval air bases] have their own reasons for restricting them, but I’m sure a lot of it is for their own security,” said Salma Ashmawi, spokesperson for the Islamic Center of Northwest Florida.
When Salma Ashmawi says that restricting Saudi airmen from operational training and confining them to their bases is “for their own security,” she can only mean that they might be physically attacked by American islamophobes with their supposed lynch-mob mentality. But there have been no attacks on any Saudis, airmen or otherwise, in the U.S. either before or since the Pensacola attack, and Ashmawi knows this perfectly well. Even after 9/11, with 15 of the 19 mass murderers having been identified as Saudis, there were no attacks on Saudi nationals anywhere in the U.S.
Is it true that the Saudi airmen “read and hear things that frighten them”? Has there been any real cause for alarm on their part? Ashmawi offers no evidence of this. And when she refers to the FBI and base [officers] who have their “own reasons for restricting them,” why doesn’t she mention those reasons? For it is obvious that a Saudi student pilot in a plane could wreak terrible damage, flying that plane into a building, or simply nosediving it, killing both the Saudi trainee and his American trainer. Certainly the American pilots who would be flying with them would want the 850 Saudi student airmen now in the U.S. to be much more thoroughly vetted after the Pensacola attack. Can Ashmawi blame them?
Ashmawi says that while the local Muslim community “mourns with the rest of Pensacola, there is also fear and anger directed their way. She has seen the impact this is having.”
Ashmawi fairly overflows with a feeling of victimization. She has embraced, as we have seen Muslims do after every terror attack in the U.S., the notion that it is they, the Muslims, who are the real “victims” and who deserve our sympathy and support. She fails to offer in evidence a single concrete example of such “fear and anger” directed at Muslims; had there been even one, she would surely have supplied the details.
“That adds and feeds into the fear of going out, fear of taking kids to our weekend school. Our numbers are really down, on Sunday we usually have 80 students, we had 37,” said Ashmawi.
Again, does Ashmawi have any evidence, anywhere, of threats against, or attacks on, Muslims in Pensacola? No, she does not. The supposed fears of Muslim parents who kept their children from attending an Islamic Sunday school – if indeed they were not merely the result of Ashmawi’s whipping up those fears herself – were groundless.
Wilfredo Ruiz with the Council of American and Islamic Relations, who served as a U.S. Navy Officer, says he does not want the Islamic community to take the blame for the actions of the shooter. He believes the focus should be on the government and what they are doing to keep citizens safe, not on one religion.
The self-pity is palpable: Wilfred Ruiz of CAIR says the Islamic community should not “take the blame for the actions of the shooter.” But it’s a baseless worry; that Islamic community is not being blamed. And it is not just Saudi students who are being investigated; all 5,200 foreign students receiving military training in this country are now being re-examined. The “actions of the shooter,” however, need to be investigated so as to prevent further tragedies. Wilfredo Ruiz thinks the focus should be, rather, not on the killer’s motives, but on what the government is “doing to keep citizens safe.” But how can you “keep citizens safe” unless you understand the motives of Muslim terrorists? And Ruiz presumably disapproves of one of the things the government has done “to keep citizens safe”: it has grounded Saudi trainee airmen until they can be vetted more thoroughly.
Isn’t the most important way for the government to “keep citizens safe” by investigating what led Ashamrani to commit his murders? The “focus,” Ruiz claims, should not be “on one religion.” Why not? According to his uncle, Ashamrani was a pious Muslim. He tweeted his hatred of America and Americans because of what he claimed were wars made on Muslims, as well as American support for Israel against Muslims. Friends described him as “becoming much more religious” when he returned to Pensacola in February from a visit to Saudi Arabia. Throughout the world, there have been two decades of incessant terrorist attacks by Muslims against non-Muslims, akin to that in Pensacola. Given all this, wouldn’t it be foolish of investigators not to focus on “one religion” — the religion of Islam?
“There are tens of thousands of Muslims in America who put on their fireman uniform, deputy, armed force uniforms, or suits for our intelligence offices that are on, a daily basis, willing to give their lives for fellow citizens and nation,” Ruiz said.
No one has denied that there are Muslims in America who work as firemen, policemen, in the military, or intelligence services. But this is irrelevant to the matter at hand: should the Saudi airmen in this country be allowed to fly before being vetted more thoroughly, given the Pensacola killings by one of their number?
Senator Rick Scott has called for the foreign national training program to stop, pending a thorough review of the vetting process.
“Step one, we’ve got to understand how we need to vet better. Step two, until we know what’s going to happen, we ought to just shut down the program. We shouldn’t be putting people at risk. The next thing that ought to happen is the Saudi government needs to fully cooperate and they need to say they are absolutely committed to if anybody’s done anything wrong, holding them accountable,” Scott said, “There’s wonderful people here in this country from all over the world, Florida is a melting pot, but there’s also radical Islam and we’ve got to deal with radical Islam.
Senator Scott sensibly says that the program training Saudi students needs to be re-examined. What is the background of the students? Have they displayed any antipathy to non-Muslims? Have they shown an interest in previous terror attacks? What have they said on social media about Unbelievers? About Americans in particular? Will the Saudi government supply what information it has about the religious beliefs of these trainee airmen? What mosques did they attend, and how devout were they? What was meant by his fellow Saudis when they described Ashamrani as becoming “more religious” when he returned from a trip to Saudi Arabia in February? Until much more is known about each of the Saudi airmen, they should be kept out of planes; one can well imagine the damage a terrorist in the cockpit could cause. But part of that vetting should include an investigation into what those students have been taught in Saudi schools, with its textbooks full of antisemitic and anti-Christian teachings. And such investigation should also examine the Qur’anic verses that command Muslims to wage violent Jihad on non-Muslims. How likely is it that devout Saudi Muslims will ignore, rather than heed, such commands? Can we trust the Saudi government to discuss truthfully with American investigators the contents of the Qur’an, or will the most important influence on Alshamrani, his faith, be minimized or ignored?
There’s no word on how long the Saudi students will remain restricted to the base.
Ashmawi wants the focus to remain on the heroes who fought back and lost their lives on Friday morning.
Of course Salma Ashmawi wants everyone to turn their attention away from the Saudi killer, and focus on those whom he killed, or rather, on their acts of heroism and not on their identities, as perceived by Alshamrani. For the victims can tell us one thing about the motives of the Muslim killer: he wanted to kill Infidels. That one of the victims turned out to be a Muslim was strictly an accident.
The FBI has also reaffirmed the Saudi government’s cooperation as they continue their investigation into what they’re presuming is an “act of terrorism.”
The Saudi government’s “cooperation” will not include a truthful discussion of what Ashamrani learned from Saudi textbooks about non-Muslims, nor of what the Qur’an commanded him to do. Instead, it will probably consist of making his relatives and friends available for questioning; they will to a man express their puzzlement at his acts, wondering how any devout Muslim could have done such a thing. No one will be impolite enough to remind them that 36,000 devout Muslims “have done such a thing” — a terror attack — since 9/11. And the Saudi press has already condemned him as having betrayed his faith and the trust of his country, “which spent millions on his education.”
Islam’s texts and teachings, which were what prompted his attack, are not going to be mentioned by the Saudis. And the FBI, now politically correct, will not wish to put Islam itself in the dock. Any agent that did so might be accused by CAIR of “islamophobia” and his career jeopardized. Nearly twenty years after 9/11, the American government has still not dared to present to the American public the Qur’anic verses that prompted both that atrocity, and all of the other terror attacks carried out since by Muslims on Infidels, including that in Pensacola. The all-purpose charge, never explained, will be trotted out: Alshamrani was “radicalized” or “self-radicalized.” No effort will be made to explain what “radicalization” means, and how the faith of a “radicalized” Muslim differs — if it does — from what mainstream Islam teaches. But at least the faith of “Islam” and its putative mutant, “radicalization” will be discussed as if they are two distinct phenomena. No one will learn that it is merely a matter of fervor that distinguishes the two; the “radicalized” Muslim differs from the mainstream Muslim only in this: he is the one who is willing to act on what Islam teaches, that is to fight, to kill, to smite at the necks of, to strike terror in the hearts of, Infidels.
What Salma Ashmawi should have said, but did not, was this: “First, we have received no reports of any attacks or threats of attacks made against Muslims, and there is not the slightest reason for Muslims in Florida to vary their ordinary routine. Students should attend Muslim Sunday school, and worshippers should go to their mosques, as they always do. Second, we understand why the government has ceased operational training for Saudi trainee airmen. Given the government’s failure to have detected any problem with Mohammed Alshamrani, it is taking no chances with other Saudis, who will be subject to a much more thorough vetting process. It makes perfect sense to keep those airmen grounded until that process is complete. They will still, of course, be allowed to take part in classroom training. And it should be noted that all 5,200 foreign military personnel now receiving training in this country, whatever their religion or nationality, will be subject to re-vetting at the same time. Third, we hope that the Saudi government will fully cooperate with American investigators in determining what prompted Alshamrani’s terror attacks. Let them provide his schoolbooks for examination, and the exact editions of the religious texts – Qur’an, Hadith – he would have read and studied.
Could Salma Ashmawi conceivably have said any of that? Of course not. She’s too busy feeling sorry for herself and for all the other Muslims “here and abroad” who are now the victims – as happens after every terror attack by someone who has been “radicalized” – of the “fear and anger” directed at them by reflexively bigoted Unbelievers.
Frank Anderson says
All it takes is the least reading to find out what has been taught, and continues to be taught. Anyone in a decision-making position that does not know is deliberately ignorant. Spencer’s Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, Warner’s Abridged Koran, Gabriel’s Unfinished Battle. Any of these should show the futility and delusion of ignoring the truth.
mortimer says
Good point from FA: “WHAT HAS BEEN TAUGHT”.
The Saudi school system teaches jihad to every student. The pilot was a warrior for Islam … the SAUDI SCHOOL SYSTEM FORMED HIS IDEOLOGY. This jihadism is an OFFICIAL PART of the indoctrination of EVERY SINGLE SAUDI SCHOOL CHILD from kindergarten to high school.
By the time they leave high school, EVERY Saudi child is a convinced supporter of jihad. The US military has to get the message to the State Department that Soddy Barbaria is indoctrinating jihad killers and sending them to learn to fly at American military bases.
The risk of a loose jihadi cannon in the Saudi students is too high. The Saudis must change this or pay a price.
Frank Anderson says
Mortimer, They cannot change. You and several others here know far more than I. But I understand that part.
mortimer says
The Saudi school system is teaching jihad and they definitely have the ability to REMOVE jihad and Al Walaa wal Baraa from the curricula.
Of course, the Saudi government cannot remove the doctrines from Islam, but they can remove them from school lessons.
If they don’t remove jihad from school curricula, then we should make them pay a price until they do … We have already told the Saudis to remove those lessons from their school books. School-indoctrinated Saudis are a real risk to our Western societies.
Frank Anderson says
Mortimer, if they remove it from one place it will always be in others. Removing is does not denounce it, and is not a change, which is punishable by death.
gravenimage says
Mortimer, the Saudis are not going to stop their vicious Islamic teachings.
We need to stop thinking that they are our allies.
Faggot says
Hi, what can Jihad Killers..?
Leslie Fish says
Awww, the poor bigots are feeling sorry for themselves? Well, boo-hoo-hoo. Throw the bums out. Throw *all* the bums out. They’ve worn out their welcome.
mortimer says
We should IMMEDIATELY challenge such statements of purported victimhood. We should immediately say:
“WHAT? Don’t you as a PIOUS MUSLIM endorse and support JIHAD AGAINST THE KAFIRS? … or do you practice Islam-à-la-carte? Isn’t JIHAD a CENTRAL DEED of Islam? Isn’t JIHAD the SIXTH PILLAR of Islam? Why are you ashamed of THIS particular jihad?” If reporters consistently ask why Muslims condemn a particular terrorist attack … probing to find out how the attack is not a TRUE jihad … then Muslim apologists will stop using the ‘victimhood defense’ because they will be forced into CRITICIZING THE JIHADISTS … something that will place them in DANGER from the jihad promoters!
Mullah (and jihad teacher) Anwar Awlaki spoke disingenuously after 9-11. He said, ‘They (the attackers) have PERVERTED their religion.’ Of course, Awlaki TAUGHT some of the 9-11 attackers and approved of the 9-11 attacks.
So the bottom line is this:
Muslims are OBLIGATED TO ENDORSE JIHAD or they are lying … aren’t they? It’s a clear either-or proposition.
Muslims want to secretly support jihad and have business-as-usual with the dirty kufaar. Playing the victim helps them to maintain their not-very-credible claim of innocence. Muslims want to pretend the jihad attacks never happened. But Muslims take every opportunity to cite attacks against Muslims … which are very few in comparison to attacks against kafirs … perhaps a ratio of 1000:1.
Muslims use melodrama and victimology so they can eat their cake of business with kafirs and have their jihad cake on the side.
So Islamic victimology and melodrama is a Jedi mind-trick … a distraction from the reality that JIHAD is NORMATIVE Islam, rather than an aberration.
Michael Copeland says
Wilfredo Ruiz of CAIR says he does not want the Islamic community to take the blame for the actions of the shooter.
This is in curious opposition to Islam’s instructions in the Pact of Omar, in how to deal with kaffirs. Islam instructs that in the event that one kaffir offends against Islamic law all his co-religionists will be treated as culpable and can expect retribution. Hence the aggression against Christians in Pakistan when a Koran is burnt in Florida.
rubiconcrest says
Indeed, based on Islamic teachings, the non-Muslims in the community have the most to fear going forward.
mortimer says
Good point, MC. Sharia law has double standards, and blanket retaliation against all kafirs for the infractions of one is NORMATIVE in all Muslim countries. For instance, if a kafir dates a Muslim woman, the Muslims beat him and his family up, burn their house and then for good measure, they burn the church. Such retribution is considered proper by many Muslims … that’s why mobs are easily formed. The kafirs should know their place. Westerners are the most un-bigoted people in history, but backward Muslims fear we will behave as they do. We will not.
What we see from the Muslims in Florida is the idea that kafirs share their views on retaliation. WE DON’T. We don’t believe in blanket punishment … that’s bigotry. Islam, however, is systemically bigoted.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Hello, Michael Copeland. In trying to verify that the Pact of Omar “instructs that in the event that one kaffir offends against Islamic law all his co-religionists will be treated as culpable and can expect retribution”, I looked up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pact_of_Umar
and found that one of the restrictions on dhimmis is that
“The appearance of the non-Muslims has to be different from those of the Muslims: Prohibition against wearing Qalansuwa (kind of dome that was used to wear by Bedouin), Bedouin turban (Amamh), Muslims shoes [what are Muslim shoes?], and Sash to [around?] their waists. As to their heads, it was forbidden to comb the hair sidewise as the Muslim custom, and they were forced to cut the hair in the front of the head. [What? No bangs liked those sported by Moe of the Three Stooges?] Also non-Muslim[s] shall not imitate the Arab-Muslim way of speech nor shall adopt the kunyas (Arabic byname, such as “abu Khattib”).”
Huh? How can one wear a dome, and on what part of the body? Does “that was used to wear by Bedouin” mean “that Bedouins used to wear”? I can’t find anywhere on the Internet what a Qalansuwa (why capitalized?) is.
https://www.threestooges.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/bioimageMoe3.jpg
Stan Lore says
I think such fears will always exist. The solution? Leave the USA.
mortimer says
Disagree, the solution is to help Muslims see that the Koran is of human origin and they will leave Islam instantly.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Disagree, the solution is to help Muslims see that the Koran is of human origin and they will leave Islam instantly.
That’s true, Mortimer, it’s a human invention by an immoral man, a robber, a murderer, and torturer. The true Creator–if there is one–would never have produce the idiotic and violent trash of islam. I believe faithful muslims are hypnotized by islam’s fetish-like spell, they cling to those outmoded ideas like a superstitious rube clutching a lucky charm. They are like dumb sheep who are controlled by unscrupulous and opportunistic men who exploit their ignorance for their own power and gain. There is no exceptional wisdom in islam beyond what our instincts could have produced on their own, islam isn’t worth all the psychopathy and terror that comes with it.
I appeal especially to the young muslims of the world, dare to question and challenge the retarded beliefs of your elders. Do so with intelligent questions and rebuttals. If they respond in anger with no intellect to back it up then you know they’re full of sh*t. I know it’s easier said than done because muslims run the risk of getting murdered for apostasy. But this is the only way to break that spell and mitigate the violence and hate of islam. If young muslims want to be rebels then be rebels for good sense and truth, not the immoral dictates of a retarded demon. Those muslim terrorists hiding out in caves with Ak47’s aren’t fighting a noble cause, they’re are fools for a gangster god that can give them nothing but heartache and confusion. Don’t throw away your life by killing innocents for a morally insane religion, instead gain respect by doing the right thing for peace and good sense. Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
Wellington says
Well stated, AAP.
underbed cat says
I wonder if they would leave Islam immediately. If they breath one word of leaving to another muslim could be beaten, or killed as an apostate … an act to enforce Islamic sharia law. They would have to be in a country unlike Saudi Arabia, or other 56 OIC Islamic countries, that follow sharia ,one that does “not” allow sharia law, except we are encouraging Islam and sharia that is a problem. Currently in S.A. declaring and showing a face of modernization for the younger generation, is viewed as good, I just wonder how long that will last and what dangers that presents. as it could be an attempt to lessen the defenses of other countries for a positive agreement on weapons, or trade. or defense…there are video’s out and you have to wonder, is this done as a honest but unlikely message or a deception. Most frightening to me is the duty to protect citizens of non Quranic countries has failed, and one party seems to be all in, so this doctrine has been able spread in the U.S.. They have been able to set up and build support Islamic organizations and communities to deny the facts, grow population and present a non- threat, enter into all areas of leadership and when an jihad attack takes place we have some politicians and police who will deny it, ( maybe they have never been informed) even if the prep screams it, blocked from the public, with a danger of the goal to work to destroy from within in all areas of American life. The open borders since 9/11 which should have been protected were left to be a easy walk in for the jihad doctrine, labeled as a religion, 9/11 should have been a wakeup call, but it was greeted with the the denial of the genisus doctrine of jihad and related terror groups, labeled a religion with no correct defintion of Islam and the threat of the goals of sedition disruption. The muslims who left Islam now in western countries would be threatened by this mass line muslim migration.
gravenimage says
What? You don’t want committed Muslims to leave the US?
Do you want to bring in *more* Muslims in the vain hope that they will all listen to the “filthy Infidels” and immediately leave Islam?
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
“That adds and feeds into the fear of going out, fear of taking kids to our weekend school…
I suggest that if muslims are “fearful” of the anger then it’s because they know that anger is justified.
The muslim community bears a large measure of responsibility for these terror attacks along with all the other jihad threats because of their support and participation for islam’s violent and hateful ideas. So yeah, I’m angry. I’m angry because I know they are living and promoting political/religious ideas that provoke this kind of hate and violence. Religion can be as powerful as a strong narcotic, it can literally turn good people into the worst kind of hater and killer. If muslims want to be afraid then they should be afraid of their own religion, it is islam that is provoking all this violence and social divisiveness. Islam teaches murder and bigotry as divine truth to be followed, we good people who react out of justifiable anger and fear are not to blame. And Fitzgerald is correct, Salma should have said what he said in his 2nd to last paragraph. But that would have been too fair minded and respectful toward non-muslims and our national security. Salma wants this to be seen as an isolated incident, I’m sure, but the true context is one of mass terror and murder for allah 1400 years old. Ruiz wants us to remember the “… thousands of Muslims in America who put on their fireman uniform… for fellow citizens and nation,” but he also wants us to forget 9/11 and all the other attacks muslims do against us “infidels” by the thousands. Muslims are totally incapable of introspection regarding their “religion” but are experts at demanding others change theirs for them, even if it means we must destroy ourselves in the process. If muslims are getting anger from non-muslims then it’s because they deserve it. Start taking responsibility, muslims, for your own bad actions and beliefs. We aren’t to blame for your retarded religious superstition and the terror it’s causing–YOU ARE.
Norger says
When Muslims defend Islamic theology in general terms (e.g. “Islam is peaceful” or “that Islamic terrorist attack had nothing to do with Islam,” I always wonder whether they are genuinely ignorant as to what Islamic theology teaches or if they are being intentionally deceptive or if they have actually convinced themselves that their bullsh*t is true. In any event, you are correct, Muslims are generally incapable of any amount of rational introspection or intellectually honest assessment as to exactly what their religion in fact teaches.
James says
The US should stop bringing anyone from the terrorist countries into the US for training with weapons or airplanes.
PRCS says
Dear Salma has been given quite a bit of unchallenged air/news time.
On the day of the attack, she regaled another clueless ‘reporter’ with that now standard, deceitfully truncated reading of Qur’an 5:32 “God has said if you kill one human, it’s as though you have killed all humanity.”
Of course, Qur’an 5:26–5:32 is a plagiarism of the Jewish tale of Cain and Able.
What Qur’an 5:32, written by Jews to Jews–really says:
https://quran.com/5/32-42?translations=20
“Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”
Has any PCOLA area ‘journalist’ contacted her about that ?
Norger says
Of course not. You can’t expect “journalists” to take advantage of the Information Age and actually check to see what America’s favorite (deliberately misquoted) Koranic verse actually says.
Quazgaa says
Modifying the saudi curricula would endanger the alliance between monarchy and the religious leaders who give legitimacy to the regime. It would be like asking the turtle to part with its shell.
It would require weakening the religious element first, then move on with reforms once the only credible opposition has been put to rest. The intermediate unknown in this equation are the saudi people themselves. This is a modernization project in its own right, and one can only hope is on mbs’ agenda.
Battle says
Ashmalwi cares only for Muslims and jihad.
The investigation needs to focus on the report about the shooter’s anger at the Moslem killed who was reported to have converted to Christianity.
gravenimage says
Islamic Community in Pensacola Feels Sorry for Itself
………………..
With the greatest respect to Hugh Fitzgerald, I don’t think this is the Islamic community feeling sorry for itself–instead, this is Muslims trying to instill unearned guilt in Infidels, so that we will stop trying to defend against Jihad altogether.
Lilith Wept says
The cause of this attack is ISLAM , the mainstream core doctrine of Islam.
It’s NOT “radical Islam”!!!
…Saying the cause is “radical Islam “is saying that this shooter is a radical we are saying that he has somehow mis interpreted or mis understood, or taken to extreme, the implied more peaceful doctrine of Islam. That his ideas of Islam’s doctrine is skewed, completely wrong.
We know that the problem is these terrorists are getting Islam right, they understand perfectly what Islam teaches , what the Koran says and what Mohammed said and what he did …and they are copying Mohammed’s actions, just as the Koran says they should be doing……
We know this to be false. We know it’s the core , mainstream teaching of Islam. It is what every Islamic scholar accepts as accurate Islamic doctrine , and what every moslem accepts as being perfectly Islam and true. It is the texts of the Koran and Hadiths that repeatedly say that to be a good Moslem , to please Allah, to have a guaranteed entry into Paradise, to obey both the commands of Allah and Mohammed…to even be considered a Moslem , a Moslem must fight against infidels …until either there ARE no ore infidels Because everyone has submitted to Islam or they have been killed in the fight ….this is obligatory for moslems . Even Mohammed bragged that “ I have been made victorious through terror”
And there is nothing a Moslem can do that is as good as fighting jihad against infidels and either getting their women and property or dying as a martyr . No amount of good deeds, or fasting, or donations or freeing slaves …nothing equals jihad.
To call these acts of terrorism the result of “Radical Islam” is to say that …” well if we can identify and eliminate those FEW MISGUIDED INDIVIDUALS who have misunderstood, misinterpreted the implied more peaceful doctrine of Islam , get rid of those few bad eggs, then whew! Everything will be all right. We I’ll eliminate all this terrorism! “
That’s a childish , simplistic and completely false notion.
And it serves to hide the fact that the problem is not some perverted or misunderstood form of Islam , believed by only a few bad people, that is the cause of all the terrorist acts perpetrated by moslems…but it’s Islam itself. It’s the teachings that every Islamic scholar, every Islamic school of jurisprudence , every Moslem reads in the Koran and Hadiths and believes to be true , accurate ,Islam.
Until we face the truth that it’s the core , mainstream doctrine of Islam that is the sole source of the belief that results these acts of terrorism, then we can’t begin to find a solution to the problem of Islamic Terrorism .
Islam is the cause of acts of terrorism perpetrated by moslems . The solution is out governments, our politicians and leaders acknowledging that Islam is the cause of the terrorism ……and then standing up to Islamic bullying and threats and DOING something about Islam and the ever spreading Islamic influence in the West.
SaveYourSoul says
There are no “good” Muslims.
If they practice Islam, then they are enemies of the Kafir.
Dr. Doom says
So sorry to hear the Muslims are butt-hurt. Too bad.
MJP says
Nobody who believes in the Quran nor Sharia Law belongs in any Western Country that baloney about there are good Muslims does not fly if they are Muslims they are Bad & only a very small percentage will change
TomSJr says
Just wait until WE COME FOR YOU, like you came for us IN 9/11, Pensacola and many many other place in America and abroad, all you pathetic EVIL Muslims and THAT MEANS EVERY MUSLIM IN AMERICA!
WE…ARE…COMING…FOR…YOU…………
Lilith Wept says
I just wish we would begin that already .
All this pandering, appeasement and giving in to every Moslem demand is weakness. And now do moslems respond to weakness? They demand even more , they push even harder to Islamify our country and spread Islamic influence …because they see they are winning! They are making progress…
Moslems understand and respect strength…( as much as they respect anything we kafir do) After the defeat at the gates of Vienna, they didn’t keep on attacking..they stopped.
So if moslems understand strength then we should be strong , darn it!
We should not give in to moslems demand, who cares if moslems are offended, get over it?
And we should respond to moslems demands and attempts to Islamify our countries, spreading Islamic influence….with strength …
Will this stop them? No, I don’t think so. Not if we just stop giving in , moslems will always keep,pushing. But our politicians and the liberals are ALLOWING moslems to take our country. They are giving away something that cost the blood, lives and hard work of Americans .
We should value America and our freedoms and rights enough to fight for them. Not just on the battle field but here at home.
We should be willing to try to find a peaceful legal means of stopping the Islamic takeover of our country. And if we can’t find a peaceful legal means then we should be willing to do whatever it takes for us to keep,our country free of Islam.