Here is another glimpse into the future of the West. We don’t put to death people who question Muhammad’s conduct; we just vilify, shun, and defame them, and bar them from polite society. See how enlightened the West is?
“Pakistanis accuse Twitter user of blasphemy for questioning polygamy of the Prophet, call for her public execution,” OpIndia, December 29, 2019:
One Aneela Ehsan, presumably from Pakistan, committed blasphemy as per Islamic law when she ‘blasphemed’ against the religion by questioning the conduct of prophet Muhammad. Now, Pakistanis are trending a hashtag on Twitter calling for her arrest and execution.
In a couple of tweets, Aneela had questioned the conduct of the Prophet and asked why had he married 18 women apart from Khadija. In response, Pakistanis are tagging their Prime Minister Imran Khan in their tweets and demanding that she be put to death.
Some people, however, want her to be put to death after a trial. The punishment for blasphemy in any Islamic state is death. And insults to the prophet are considered one of the worst forms of blasphemy.
Some are saying that Aneela seems to be an ‘anti-Islamist and extremist’ because of her tweets. They want the authorities to investigate why she was ‘working on such an extremist agenda’.
Others accused Aneela of “spreading hate” and said that they couldn’t read more than a few of her tweets because, apparently, it was “open blasphemy”.
Blasphemy attracts great punishment in Pakistan, even death. Not merely that, even people who are seen supporting the ‘blasphemers’ often face threats to their life. It is impossible to get rid of the blasphemy laws in Pakistan and the authorities do take blasphemy very seriously as failure to do so could lead to a law and order crisis. If authorities do not take any action, then Maulanas would whip up the crowd into a frenzy that has the potential to destabilize the Military’s hold over the country….
PRCS says
They want to rule the world.
mortimer says
The Pakistanis may end up in another severe civil war between Pakistanis before ‘ruling’ anything. In 1971, three million East Pakistan Benghalis were killed by the Pak Army.
The Pak blasphemy law may yet lead to major civil unrest and destruction. Pakistan is making itself a human rights pariah.
gravenimage says
Mortimer, this would have to based on large numbers of Muslims hating Islam. I’m afraid i don’t see that happening.
Francis Weber says
Damn shame
Save Europe says
No sh*t, Sherlock!
Trick_or_Treat says
Save Europe: yes, they might ‘love’ islam (as far as what passes as ‘love’ goes with this trash) but, in reality, vast amounts and factions of them just absolutely hate each other’s guts to the death. If you give them the means, and enough ammo, they might ‘do it’ for us.
This what that old Black Hat, Dr Henry Kissenger, was upto during the Iran-Iraqi war in the 80’s. Once, when questioned why the US was apparently arming both sides of the conflict to the back-teeth, he said that the general expectation was, if both sides were given enough means, and enough ammunition to go with it, then, hopefully, the c**ts would all annihilate themselves for us.
(Oh’, perhaps you are saying that you didn’t hear about that one in your mainstream, print, TV, or rafio media? No, I’m not surprized!)
Jim Nagle says
Put away your crayon and stop with the childish comments.
Mich says
Jesus will let them rule in hell!
CogitoErgoSum says
Islam truly is the religion from Hell.
mortimer says
Islam is 23 cults in one:
-a death cult, a rape cult, an honor-killing cult, an extortion cult, a plunder cult, a censorship cult, a misogyny cult, a lie cult, a pedophilia cult, a sadomasochistic cult, an obsessive-compulsive cult, a supremacism cult, a Jew hatred cult, a Christian-o-phobia cult, a male chauvinist cult, an inbreeding cult, an obscurantism cult, a superstition cult, a personality cult, a cruelty to animals cult, a group-think cult, a suicide cult.
Mostly Islam is a CENSORSHIP CULT in Pakistan.
Islam demands a superior right to other religions, namely, that a Muslim should not hear anything that a Muslim would not like to hear.
We must all give the gift of free speech to our opponents or we will not have it ourselves when the time comes.
Battle says
CogitoErgoSum: +100
Mich says
I agree and maybe they should be beheaded instead.When Jesus judges them,then they will understand and it will be too late.
Steven Taylor says
These people are dangerous. They believe that THEIR WAY is THE ONLY WAY. Everyone is entitled to their opinion except when Muslims deem them not to be!
They are actually crazed fanatics.They need to be eliminated!
Jayell says
Maybe they don’t want Mohammed’s conduct to be questioned because that would compromise their presumed right to indulge their every depraved whim, as their hero Mohammed did – in effect, taking away their licence exploit, debase and pervert and will. All this ‘blasphemy’ business is just a sham to conceal their motives.
Michael Copeland says
See:
“The top five most disgusting facts about Prophet Muhammad” – youtube.
video by David Wood
Ashley Goode says
You’re exactly right!!!
revereridesagain says
Referring back to an earlier post, why would anyone be proud to be a Pakistani? They are either bloodthirsty Muslim fundies or trapped there with vile Muslim fundies.
Bill says
This is Freedom of Religion under Sharia Law. The same Sharia Law that Ilhan Omar advocates for America.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, just advocated adopting some parts of Sharia in British law.
This would signal the end of equal justice under law in Britain, and a covert surrender to Islam.
Never forget that Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and their Democrat toadies are using America’s religious tolerance against us to subvert equal rights and institute an unconstitutional Muslim theocracy in a political coup.
Vote them all out if you love your liberty, especially the First Amendment Freedoms of Speech, Peaceable Assembly and Free Exercise of Religion!
#PoliticalIslam
Ashley Goode says
Yes! Please vote them out!!!!
mortimer says
CHARACTER ? MOHAMMED ? There is much to criticize.
The great editor and translator of Arabic works, Dr. David Samuel Margoliouth, wrote the following description of Mohammed’s amoral character:
“The character attributed to Muhammad in the biography of Ibn Ishaq is exceedingly UNFAVOURABLE. In order to gain his ends he recoils from no expedient, and he approves of similar unscrupulousness on the part of his adherents, when exercised in his interest. He profits to the utmost from the chivalry of the Meccans, but rarely requites it with the like. He organizes assassinations and whole-sale massacres. His career as tyrant of Medina is that of a robber chief, whose political economy consists in securing and dividing plunder, the distribution of the latter being at times carried out on principles which fail to satisfy his followers’ ideas of justice. He is himself an unbridled libertine and encourages the same passion in his followers. For whatever he does he is prepared to plead the express authorization of the deity. It is, however, impossible to find any doctrine which he is not prepared to abandon in order to secure a political end. At different points in his career he abandons the unity of God and his claim to the title of Prophet. This is a disagreeable picture for the founder of a religion, and it cannot be pleaded that it is a picture drawn by an enemy; and though Ibn Ishaq’s name was for some reason held in low esteem by the classical traditionalists of the third Islamic century, they make no attempt to discredit those portions of the biography which bear hardest on the character of their Prophet.”
(Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, volume 8, p. 878.Dr. Margiolouth)
Ade Fegan says
So slay those who speak disparagingly of a mass murderer
You couldn’t make it up
Ade Fegan says
Behead those who would behead others just for criticising muhammad
FYI says
Behead muslims who threaten to behead anyone for insulting islam..
Any Samurai around who might need a good,useful job?
keya says
It is a valid question. Why multiple women especially when he is the perfect man on earth.
Muslims excuse his polygamous nature by saying that Mo only married war widows to save them from poverty. It was not lust. In their eyes Mo could do no wrong.
CogitoErgoSum says
Yeah, he married war widows … except for the time he married the 6-year old daughter of his best friend and the time he took the wife of his adopted son. What a wonderful human being he was (gag).
Patrick B. Ludwig says
Widows thst were widowed because of his vile character in the first place.
It is comforting to kniw that obe of these poor widows was finally brave enough to do muham-merde in.
gravenimage says
+1
Michael Copeland says
WHAT MADE MOHAMMED LAUGH?
“While the Prophet was lying with Safiya”, Abu Ayyub “stayed the night at his door”, explaining in the morning,
“This young woman had just been married, and you killed her father, her brother and her husband, so I did not trust her [not to harm you].”
The Prophet laughed and said “Good!”.
Al Tabari vol.39, p.185
“Muhammad’s Jewish Wife”, video by Brother Ismaeel, at 6.0 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSV-0HdiFEM
gravenimage says
Yes–utterly evil.
Ashley Goode says
Except he the only perfect man on Earth was someone different.
Peter Buckley says
Thanks to the Internet, muslims can now read online the first biography of Muhammad, by the devout muslim Ibn Ishaq:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq
If you read the biography, you will understand why so-called “extremists” do what they do (they are copying Muhammad), and why so many muslims are leaving Islam now they are finding out the truth.
Muhammad orders his son-in-law Ali, to behead Al-Nadr bin al-Harith on page 136.
Muhammad says that those who follow him will be given paradise; those who refuse will be slaughtered and sent to hell on page 222
Muhammad approves the stabbing of Uqba bin Abu Muayt on page 308.
Muhammad arranges the beheading of Kab bin al-Ashraf on page 364-9.
Muhammad personally beheads over 600 Jewish prisoners of war on page 464
Muhammad orders the torturing of treasurer of Khaybar tribe, Kinana on page 515
Muhammad orders the killing of Abdullah bin Katal’s and one of his singing-girls on page 550-1
Muhammad approves the murder of Asma bint Marwan on page 675-6.
Muhammad arranges the assassination of the old man Abu Afak on page 675.
Muhammad approves the murder of an old one-eyed Bedouin man, by Amr bin Umayya, one of his Jihadist thugs on page 674-5.
http://www.justislam.co.uk/images/Ibn%20Ishaq%20-%20Sirat%20Rasul%20Allah.pdf
JW readers are welcome to copy and paste the above onto the comments section of any online story mentioning Muhammad. No extra comment is necessary. Islam will die of shame …….
b.a. freeman says
Islam will die of shame …….
—
would that it were so, Peter; sadly, the average ummah member is clueless about his “prophet,” his prophet’s sock puppet, allah, and the words of his sock puppet, the quran. every hafiz memorizes the quran in “classical” (7th-century) arabic, of which nobody has been a native speaker for over 1000 years, and the sock puppet only hears prayers in classical arabic, so ummah members also have to pray in a language they don’t speak. nevertheless, being part of the ummah, although a thinking handicap, is not a sentence to eternal idiocy, so if one has muslim friends who happen to speak english, one might be able to interest them in “Sirat Rasul Allah.” the best part is that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING is known about muhammed that did not come from islamic scriptures. to disagree with what this reveals is to disagree with islamic scripture … it just doesn’t get any better than that!
on another note, i must warn U that when i first went looking for this PDF (for free, natch; i don’t want to pay money to a muslim for it!), i discovered that most of the links pointed to sites that had either been taken down, or had had the PDF removed. apparently, there is a copyright owner who is relentless in chasing down illegal distribution (understandable, since he is probably from the land of the pure – pakistan), most likely because he wants the money. it took me quite a while before i found a copy that was still there; therefore, i would suggest that *EVERYBODY* snag a copy of this PDF and sequester it behind an air gap so that rogue java or js code in your browser doesn’t find and delete it.
Battle says
Pakistan adult males have a seventy-five percent literacy rate.
One out of every four adult males can not read.
Michael Copeland says
Pakistan is a failed state.
Infidel says
@jack has no problems w/ Muslims demanding a death sentence for a blasphemer. But don’t dare retweet a tweet from the Pensacola shooter, as Pete Hegseth did, or else, you’ll be banned!
elee says
If there werent multitudes of decent kafirs in Pakistan it would be so easy, just send Trump to build a wall there. So how many innocents do we abandon in this particular s**thole? There was a time when we aspired to set that number at zero……..those days are long gone.
Wellington says
The character of Mohammed is clearly that of a narcissistic, brutal psychopath (though a very clever one) so of course Muslims cannot allow the Model Man to be freely scrutinized and spoken of. The very lethal defensiveness of Muslims about Mohammed itself speaks volumes, which is lost on Muslims—but then much is lost on Muslims.
gravenimage says
Pakistan: Muslims demand that woman who questioned Muhammad’s conduct be put to death
…………..
*Hideous*. In Islam nothing can be questioned.
I hope this woman is able to get out of Pakistan.
J D.S says
More and more stupidity in Islam. And those who might be able to stop the madness are silent.
Anne Smith says
Foreign Aid to Pakistan should cease immediately.
We should not be subsidising this kind of lunacy.
gravenimage says
The US under Trump *had* cut aid to Pakistan–I’d like to see the rest of the West do the same.
islamic mirror says
Free download. Copy and paste LINK into browser.
http://www.islamic-laws.com/download/Islaamic_Sharia_Law_sunni.pdf
and
early biography of mohd https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq
Islamic scholars do not want muslims and non-muslims know about these links as they will be exposed of not telling the facts
https://www.facebook.com/notes/god-free-zone/the-ayatollah-khomeinis-booksex-
with-children-and-animals/156350977771408
“Sirat Rasulallah”, (“The Life of Muhammad”, by A. Guillaume),
according to Sirat Al-Halabi, Muhammad can have a woman no matter what, even against her will; and if Muhammad desired a married woman, her husband would have had to divorce her.
According to Ibn Sa’ad, who wrote another authoritative biographical account of Muhammad, “The prophet did not die till all women were permitted him” (see Kitab Al Tabaqat Al Kubra, v.8, 194).
Koran 4:3, which “limits” a Muslim’s wives to four , plus “what your right hands possess,” that is, slave-girls.
That was apparently not good enough for Muhammad, an entire verse had to be “revealed” justifying more women for him (Koran 33:50
a list of all the women—66 are known—to have had sexual relations with Muhammad.
Muhammad and his Women (u-tube)
AbiKerfa
Published on 3 Oct 2015
Category Education Licence Standard YouTube Licence
Michael Copeland says
Jesus did not have a favorite sword called Neck-Cleaver.
gravenimage says
Good point.
Michael Copeland says
SCUM AND RUBBISH
Mohammed made very few prophecies. Here is one:
“Muslims will be the scum and the rubbish even though their numbers may increase;
the enemy will not fear Muslims anymore.
This will be because the Muslims will love the world and dislike death…”
(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 37.4284.)
jca reid says
Aaahhhh yes….. the MOST TOLERANT of “Religions”. This Death Cult ought to be wiped out. Its intention is to dominate the World. Nothing else is permitted to exist. Strange though, if we ALL became Muslim, how can the blokes get their sex slaves? This pandering by the Western “Leaders”, (Macron Trudeau, Merkel & Co.), won’t be leaders for much longer. The damage they’ve done to their respective countries in an undisputed fact & their Parties & followers won’t be forgiven for this enthrallment to a Fascistic, perverted ideology & the rabid, feral scum that endorse it!
Brunz says
If Islam is a noble religion and really believes in forgiveness, let the world see.
Or really, if killing and beheading is all that can Pakistani think of, really pathetic and Ill.
Learn good practice from rest of the world, even from non Islam and Islam living in other places Question would arise, but true people can answer to all questions.
Also, if paakistani are really paak people, please refrain from naapaaki work
Please let the woman go free
gravenimage says
Pakistani Muslims consider themselves “paak”–that is, “pure”–exactly *because* they brutally persecute anyone who questions their vicious creed.