“A report has claimed that employees of the Swedish Crime Prevention Council (Brå) have been pressured by management to manipulate and obfuscate findings for political purposes….If results were not liked, then there was censorship, organisation of results, dimming of results.”
What about the rights of the public to know who these criminals are? Migrants as in other E.U. countries are mostly from Muslim countries including Syria, Iraq, Eritrea and Somalia. The Swedish government has flung open its doors to mass and unvetted Muslim migration, and the public has paid a high price for this. Muslim migrants have made bomb attacks a “normal” part of life, while foes of mass migration are smeared as bigots. The country now resembles a warzone, but this is an example of just how much Swedish officials care about the public safety and well-being:
Malin Wieslander, one of the authors of the study, defended the fact that all of those interviewed were kept anonymous, saying: “Of course, it would have been better if we could have been completely open. But because individuals in this study are so vulnerable, we have chosen to protect them.”
A report has claimed that employees of the Swedish Crime Prevention Council (Brå) have been pressured by management to manipulate and obfuscate findings for political purposes.
The report, which was released by researchers at Linköping University, claims that those working at the agency testified that the management of Brå had pressured them to “change findings which, for political, ideological or other reasons, were not desirable”, Nyheter Idag reports.
“If results were not liked, then there was censorship, organisation of results, dimming of results, and highlighting other parts of a study that were not as sensitive or could show a positive result,” one employee said.
The researchers claim that one Brå employee presented findings that were deemed politically controversial and when they presented them in a meeting, the employee was told the report would not be released.
“Both interviews and what happened during the data collection indicate that there seems to be a culture of silence within Brå and there seems to be an effort to hire people who are perceived as easy to control,” the report states.
Malin Wieslander, one of the authors of the study, defended the fact that all of those interviewed were kept anonymous, saying: “Of course, it would have been better if we could have been completely open. But because individuals in this study are so vulnerable, we have chosen to protect them.”….