At the head of the class is Judge Chutkan, an Obama appointee whom some conservatives remember for her role in the Awan case, but really she’s been a standout on immigration issues.
Especially with her contention that taxpayers must pay for the abortion of an illegal alien. That one had to go to the Supreme Court.
And now the Obama judge has another doozy.
A federal judge this week ordered the Trump administration to end visa processing delays for hundreds of Afghan and Iraqi nationals who worked for U.S. forces, giving the government 30 days to propose a plan to end backlogs that have kept many waiting more than four years to enter the United States while facing persecution and death threats.
The ruling Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan of Washington, D.C., granted class-action status to all applicants whose visa requests have been pending for more than nine months — a deadline set by statute — and followed a September opinion in which the judge called the government’s justification for delays “tortured and untenable.”
Granting class action status to visa applicants is absurd.
The supposed interpreters have included at least one rapist and ISIS member.
Bilal Abood was a translator who came here on an SIV visa. He even briefly joined the army. On the surface he was exactly the sort of refugee that the media likes to depict as the ideal immigrant.
But Abood was also a member of ISIS. America was the “enemy of Allah”, he insisted.
Even when the Iraqi SIVs weren’t joining ISIS, they were doing other terrible things. Jasim Mohammed Hasin Ramadon and Ali Mohammed Hasan Al Juboori had come to this country with SIV visas.
Ramadon had even been dubbed a hero.
Then Ramadon, Juboori and three other Iraqi refugees brutally assaulted a 53-year-old Colorado Springs woman. When the police arrived at the scene of the Iraqi refugee sexual assault, they found blood splattered on the walls.
The Iraqi refugee rapists lured in their victim by complaining about how hard it was living in America and being called terrorists. The night nurse took pity on them because they reminded her of her son.
By the time the Iraqi refugees were done, she had been violated and left near death.
Last week, I wrote about the Al Qaeda Emir who came to America and applied for disability.
After engaging in terrorism in Iraq, an Al Qaeda leader came to America as a refugee and applied for Social Security disability benefits because his “injuries” in Iraq had made it too hard for him to work.
In 2006, Ali Yousif Ahmed Al-Nouri was the Emir of an Al Qaeda terrorist group in Fallujah. The Iraqi city was the scene of brutal battles between Al Qaeda and America. It was where American soldiers had suffered the most casualties in any battle since the Vietnam War. Despite multiple defeats, Al Qaeda remained deeply entrenched in the city and was even able to seize a number of neighborhoods in 2014.
By then, Al-Nouri was living in Arizona.
Only 2 years after being the Emir of an Al Qaeda group, Al-Nouri had traded the deserts of Al-Anbar for the deserts of the Southwest. How was an Al Qaeda leader able to move to the United States?
Easy. He claimed to be a refugee from Al Qaeda.
It’s unclear if Al Nouri came here on an SIV, but considering that he got a job as a military contractor training personnel who were going to deploy to Iraq, it seems likely.
Frank Anderson says
That is the reason for the appeal process, until the trial judge does something sufficiently wrong to be removed. Ask Walter Nixon of Mississippi or Alcee Hastings of Florida.
somehistory says
Alcee Hastings…a fool if there ever was one. Look in a dictionary under fool and find there a photo of him. Can’t stand hearing about him. Also, look under liar, dishonest, cheat….his photo is likely there too. That’s my personal opinion and I’m sticking with it.
Frank Anderson says
S.H. WE AGREE ON THIS TOTALLY.
Lion Heart says
Frank Anderson: As a Canadian Christian guy myself originally from Iraq , I wanna say that Christian ancestors of Iraq said a proverb many centuries ago out of their bitter experience with Islam since its rise and it goes like this “ If a Muslim is a piece of gold, don’t put it in your pocket otherwise it will rip through “ which means Muslims ultimately would stab Christians and other non-Muslims in the back when they have the chance and power to do that especially when they take Islam seriously and we saw that betrayal of Muslims in Iraq after the fall of Saddam’s bloody regime ! so for example , Iraqi Arab Muslims stabbed the Americans in the back by fighting against them after they the American had liberated them from the evil Saddam and his bloody , evil and terrorist Baathist regime who were sitting heavily on their should for three decades and who caused then to suffer tremendously,and not only that but also even Iraqi Arab Muslims who worked as interpreters for the U.S.army after 2003 war have stabbed the Americans in the back by snitching on them to their fellow Islamic terrorists through texting about the locations and destination of the American military convoys so that those terrorists would ambush the Americans and kill them while sparing the lives of their fellow Muslims .
Steven Taylor says
So an al-Qaeda leader sustained injuries while in Iraq planning attacks against America and now WE are supporting this piece of garbage!
dapto says
Send them all to her district and she can reap the benefits
mortimer says
While the US owes it to its friends to reward their help, it must be done on a case-by-case basis.
gravenimage says
Yep.
Bob Thompson says
mortimer says While the US owes it to its friends to reward their help, it must be done on a case-by-case basis.
And I believe that is the crux of the dynamic of “moderate” Muslims gaining entry into the non Muslim society.
IT ALL STARTED WITH THIS ARGUMENT IN THE UK.
Following the progress of this phenomenon led me to my belief that ALL immigration should be stopped until, as the candidate Trump said, ‘we can figure out what the hell is going on.’
The British expanded their Empire by establishing colonies in foreign lands and they were greatly benefited from the help of the natives there who translated and fought by their side.
The winning argument was that because these foreigners were so ‘brave and noble’ in helping the British troops, even losing life in limb in the process, surely they could not be a threat to the Motherland. Surely they had EARNED the RIGHT to be offered the gift of British residency.
And for a few generations there was not enough reason to revise that policy.
And then the friendly, noble, loyal Pakistani Muslims and Indian Muslims and African Muslims who settled in the UK started families and their now British Muslim GRANDchildren and GREAT GRANDchildren became serious about their religion.
And now the UK is effectively under the influence of Jihadis to the point where there is no possibility of reversing the Islamization of their country on it’s way to adopting Sharia.
At one time Enoch Powell was a contender for the Prime Minister’s job. But not after April of 1968.
“The ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech was made by British Member of Parliament Enoch Powell on 20 April 1968, to a meeting of the Conservative Political Centre in Birmingham, United Kingdom. His speech strongly criticised mass immigration, especially Commonwealth immigration to the United Kingdom and the proposed race relations bill”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivers_of_Blood_speech
And that same dynamic is what we are discussing here.
The only difference is whether we allow them entry by the ones or twos, the hundreds or by the thousands.
Until or unless we have a way of keeping Muslims populations below the Stage One level, we are certain to find ourselves following the same fate as the Brits, because Islam is unchanging.
May 29, 2011
The Five Stages of Islam
By Richard Butrick
Forget the Five Pillars of Islam. It is the Five Stages of Islam that threaten the fundamental freedoms of Western Democracy. Freedoms which include freedom of thought, expression, and association and the crucial derived right of freedom of the press. We should never forget that “Islam” means submission — the opposite of self-determination and Enlightenment values.
Six years ago Dr. Peter Hammond published a remarkable book which included a statistical study of the correlation between Muslim to non-Muslim population ratios and the transition from conciliatory Islam to fascist Islam. The stages are the same in 2011 but the demographics have changed to show an alarming progression. Many European nations and the U.S. are on the cusp of moving to a higher bracket. The demographics change but the story is the same. First comes the taqiyya and the kitman; then comes the Sword of Islam. Imam Rauf, the Ground Zero Mosque promoter, is the current master of taqiyya. He has gulled everyone from Bloomberg to Maureen Dowd of the NYT — who fanaticizes over male Muslims. Expect doppelgangers of Khomeini for stage 5 and Islamic PEACE at last.
More at link.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/05/the_five_stages_of_islam.html
gravenimage says
Good post Bob.
Bob Thompson says
Thanks, gravenimage.
ploome says
you want doozy?
https://truepundit.com/rigged-awan-judge-appointed-by-obama-after-giving-thousands-in-campaign-cash-her-husband-appointed-a-judge-by-obama-too/
gravenimage says
This does not surprise.
somehistory says
The scum should find out where she lives and play for her sympathy since she has shown she has way too much for these creeps of ilsam. Ordinary people shouldn’t have to suffer because some fool “judge” or politician decides that he/she knows more than anyone else.
Is this idiot “judge” also moslim?
gravenimage says
I see nothing to indicate that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is Muslim. More a lefty sympathizer, I think.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage, sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference…
somehistory says
So true! And unless they admit it, or someone sees them doing the great bend on a dirty rug,…probably a lot more in office than we can possibly imagine.
gravenimage says
Grimly true. James and Somehistory.
Bob Thompson says
I wonder what I can do to help get our message to more people and more influential people.
I suggest we urge everyone on the Right to urge everyone all the time and everywhere to spread the word to ask every political candidate what they think of SHaria law in America.
Ask Pres. Trump. Ask Ted Cruz. Ask Nancy Pelosi. Ask Bernie Sanders. Ask Louie Gomert. Ask AOC. Ask Joe Biden. Ask Mike Bloomberg. Ask Gavin Newsome. Ask Rashida Tlaib. Ask Liz Cheney. Ask Ilhan-Omar. Ask Mayor Pete. Ask Mitch McConnell.
Ask EVERYONE.
And that would be so the discussion will be started in this country and require those of us with knowledge to speak up and control the narrative for a change.
Wlll anyone else do this as I am doing it?
We need everyone to do what they can.
Like Jihad.
Not everyone can do great big newsmaking things toward informing the uninformed, but everyone can do SOMETHING to help get every political candidate and politician to go on record about their understanding of Sharia law in America.
gravenimage says
I write political leaders all the time about Islam, Bob. If enough people do this, it *can* make a difference.
gravenimage says
Obama judge orders Iraqi interpreters to be brought to US; interpreters have included rapist and ISIS member
…………………….
Oh, boy…
RichardL says
0bama was an aberration in US history and DJT has lanced the boil the anti-Amnerican Kenian implanted.
Bob Thompson says
He was an aberration, yes. But one which was the fulfillment of decades of incremental progress which is explained to a dismaying extent in the award winning documentary, “The Agenda: Grinding America Down.”
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1yub7z
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1yuid1
You will get chills.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Bob.
Duckandcover says
Have President Trump defy the order setting up a Constitutional issue – President executes the law and court only interprets it. Sounds like the judge is exceeding her authority.
Frank Anderson says
Defying a court order is unwise even for a President, who has the power of pardon. Appealing the order keeps the President in much better posture when facing the next court in the chain. Most of the time either the trial court or the appeal court (and if necessary the Supreme Court) will grant a stay of the order pending the outcome of the appeal. That prevents the order from being enforced until a final ruling is obtained.
If a judge is reversed often enough on appeal it is possible the judge will stop ruling contrary to the law. At least we can dream. Look for example at the 9th Circuit, which is the most frequently reversed circuit in the federal court system until recently when DJT started appointing judges without recommendations from the “liberal” senators involved. A lot of the legal process is a game. A long expensive game.
least of terry's says
Personally, I subscribe to the view that if a judge has so many rulings overturned they be de-benched: so many strikes and your out! Back to being a hum drum SJW/islamist/socialist lawyer!
Frank Anderson says
Judges pay attention to guidance from those above. The written opinions from prior cases almost always show up attached to briefs and pleadings. Then if the trial judge fails to distinguish the present case from the prior case, the odds on appeal change. Going against a prior ruling without distinguishing the current case is not a way to impress the appeal judges. Thank God for the massive number of appeal court judges the current administration has appointed and approved.
Bob Thompson says
Judge, what is your position on Sharia law in America? Do you see it having an increasingly large role in our society?
What do you think the consequences of that will be in 5, 10 or 20 years?
Do you know that the goal of Islam is to capture every nation and make all of the World Islamic?
And did do know that Islam does not use the Golden Rule as a basic precept in it’s cultural or legal assumptions?
That means that inequality by gender, race, and religion are expected and commonplace.
Are you intentionally enabling the empowerment of an ideology which is directly oppositional to our government, laws, history, culture, basic assumptions and way of life?
Do you think you are acting patriotically?
Frank Anderson says
Bob, this is as close as you should ever get to asking those questions. Between contempt powers and criminal law, protection of judges from challenge like this makes such a challenge a no-win effort.
There is no difference now and what would have happened in Nazi Germany if any of its judges were questioned, except maybe, being shot while “resisting arrest”. That is why the power of appointment of judges is probably the most important of all Presidential duties: They remain on the bench long after the President has served his term of office. Please think about this when voting, and especially when thinking about NOT voting.
As long as the appeal process offers some measure of control judges like this will stir the bucket for a while. When they get reversed enough times, either they will learn, or the cases/authorities/precedents will pile up reducing their latitude to the level that they are ineffective.
In my experience, this is important advice. Please consult a currently licensed attorney practicing in your jurisdiction for any legal advice.
Bob Thompson says
Frank Anderson, what is your position on Sharia law in America? Do you see it having an increasingly large role in our society?
What do you think the consequences of that will be in 5, 10 or 20 years?
Do you know that the goal of Islam is to capture every nation and make all of the World Islamic?
And do you know that Islam does not use the Golden Rule as a basic precept in it’s cultural or legal assumptions?
That means that inequality by gender, race, and religion are expected and commonplace.
Are you intentionally enabling the empowerment of an ideology which is directly oppositional to our government, laws, history, culture, basic assumptions and way of life by vaguely mentioning dire possible scenarios as a way of paralyzing me into silence or inaction?
Do you think you are acting patriotically?
Are you an attorney?
Frank Anderson says
Bob, I am a retired attorney with one license that will soon be 40 years and the other will soon be 39 years since being earned.
I am as opposed as anyone can be to sharia (Islamic law). Several more knowledgeable commenters have explained to us that “sharia law” is incorrect. Sharia means “Islamic law”; so calling it sharia law is the same as saying Islamic law law.
I have faced MANY hostile, corrupt and incompetent judges IN their courtrooms. I have had to fight hard to keep from making comments that would not only destroy my case, but put me in jail. I learned early to treasure, respect and support honest judges and to fight the others with the tools that did not hurt me much more than they hurt them. I have noted many times how judges hate to be reversed on appeal, which does not happen often enough. As many as 85 percent of all appeals are denied. But those that succeed “teach” and embarrass a judge (if that is possible) into compliance with the law, even when the judge confuses himself with a Medical Doctor (aka Minor Deity). At the least, appealing an outrageous ruling teaches the judge that the lawyer is not a pushover. Of all the debtors’ lawyers practicing in my local bankruptcy court, I believe I was the ONLY one who appealed both judges 3 times each, on my dime, to show them I could if nothing else.
I think it would be better to not give details of an experience where an onlooker made a completely absurd comment to a judge and destroyed any chance I had of prevailing in the argument of a key motion related to decades of litigation. I share your displeasure, dislike and desire for better days.
I think my comments over the past several years here show where my loyalty lies. Frank
karmi says
What kind of name is Chutkan?
WPM says
The name does not matter ,the skin color does not matter ,what matters is the embracing and promoting the importing of Jihad terrorist into the country .Fifth columnist judges helping to breed
mayhem, terrorist ,jihad in the streets of America for the” progressive cause” and their” personal feeling” on what is justice .
gravenimage says
I don’t think it is Islamic, if that’s what you mean.
D3F1ANT says
The problem with employing criminal interpreters is that you can’t trust them to offer accurate translations! They can tell you anything they like. But…I guess such considerations are above my pay grade–and, it seems, everyone else’s too…
Frank Anderson says
D., can you imagine what they would do to your words when telling others what you say? Talk about the ultimate “garbage in, garbage out”! I don’t know that I have ever seen or dealt with a “one-way liar”. Hey! That reminds me of several people in Congress that have spent much time on television recently.
And when you are in the field of combat, in the boonies or courtroom, NOTHING is above your pay grade. Your life is on the line.
OLD GUY says
I’d like to say that Judge Chutkan is just another nut job put up by the left. I think she is a serious threat to our security and way of life.
somehistory says
For those who would like more on the awan case she “handled”…
https://cms.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/02/imran-awan-sues-daily-caller-regnery-publishers-lloyd-billingsley