It’s the Daily Mail so take it with a grain of salt. But it’s the numbers more than the adultery that interests me.
We know Rep. Ilhan Omar cheated on her husband with her fundraiser from his wife’s filings. And we know that she paid a whole lot of money into his company. But where’s this alleged $250K settlement coming from?
Ilhan Omar’s husband discovered the truth about her torrid affair with her chief fundraiser when he went to her Washington D.C. apartment last spring and found the lovers lounging around in pajamas, DailyMail.com has learned exclusively.
Ahmed Hirsi had long suspected that Omar, 39, was cheating on him with married Tim Mynett but the proof came when he caught the hijab-wearing congresswoman in a state that no Muslim woman would expect to be with a man who is not her husband.
Two separate sources confirmed the account to DailyMail.com, saying that Hirsi was left ‘angry and humiliated’ by the encounter.
‘He suspected she was cheating but she kept telling him he was paranoid,’ one source said.
‘He told her he wanted to move down to D.C. to be with her but she insisted he should stay in Minneapolis with the children. Eventually he surprised her down there and his worst fears were confirmed.
‘It wasn’t that he actually caught them in bed but they were clearly in a romantic situation.’
These sources would presumably be close to Hirsi even though he got a sizable payout.
Omar’s campaign paid Mynett’s fundraising company more than half a million dollars last year, according to newly released Federal Election Commission figures. The amount paid each month increased dramatically after their affair was revealed at the end of July.
In December alone his E Street Company received $87,683, according to the figures reviewed by DailyMail.com.
The sources say the families of Hirsi and Omar hammered out a financial settlement that would give Hirsi tens of thousands of dollars over several years but only if he did not speak publicly about the marriage breakdown.
One source said the figure was as high as $250,000 over six years. Hirsi did not return DailyMail.com requests for comment.
Soon after the agreement was reached last year Hirsi, 40, traded in his old Nissan Maxima for a BMW 528i, which sells for $54,000 new.
Rep. Omar is making $174K. That’s before taxes. She’s got kids and a pricey D.C. apartment. Paying out $40K a year is not easy even with that salary.
$250K over six years would be a sizable payout. Especially if Omar were to lose her seat. Where is that kind of money coming from?
And, again, what role is her massive fundraising and the payouts to her lover’s company, playing in all this?
If Rep. Omar committed to paying her ex forty thousand a year, she expects to have the money even if she were to lose her next election. Where is that money coming from?
mortimer says
Why does she bother to wear a headscarf if she doesn’t ‘BELONG’ to a man?
Ahmed Hirsi could get more money than she’s paying from the tabloids who would pay him a million dollars for his full story.
Infidel says
Not just that, he should demand FULL custody of his kids
somehistory says
cair, the mb, turkey’s er dog wan, and many, many other moslims and their orgs are donating money so she can stay in office…where she can do much damage in bringing the “miserable house” down and helping to install the lawless code of islam on the country.
Right now, omar and tlaib are two of the weapons that moslims are using to get what they want…total power over the people of the U.S. To keep being those weapons, they must remain in office. To remain in office, they have to bring in donations…probably many could be found to be illegal donations if someone checked…and moslims everywhere are being encouraged to support these moslim women…no matter what they do, including adultery which is against even what moslims believe.
And in that photo, she looks like the snake that she has proven to be.
DazzleMe says
Amen to that somehistory!
Apathy Rules the World says
I don’t know why you are dissing the Daily Mail. It is a great news source and is happy to print news that others shy away from.
gravenimage says
The paper, sadly, is often all too Islamophilic.
Apathy Rules the World says
I’ll never forget when a newly converted muslim tried to blow up a family restaurant in Exeter, England. A few hours after it happened the Daily Mail had printed his name, age and the mosque he went to. The BBC and the police were still saying they had no idea of the motive. That was 12 years ago so things may have changed.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that information.
Dawne Swift says
I agree. There are things revealed in the Daily Mail that no other news sources in the UK will touch. It surely doesn’t print everything but would probably be shut down if it did.
RichardL says
Can anyone shed some light on the legal situation with her “marrying” in a islamic ceremony and that being legally valid in this country and then getting a legal divorce?
gravenimage says
Weird but true, Richard. This is to make sure that all parties have the protection of a legal divorce–but your are right that this essentially lends plausibility to illegal marriages.
MTMLA says
Daily Mail today (2/19) has an article about her marriage to her affeminate brother with the purpose of bringing him to US and go to college. She had a Christian marriage even though she is a muslima. Another Somali told DM about the whole thing. She even duped her whole community. What a snake, hiss, hiss.???
somehistory says
Anyone who performs marriages must be licensed to do so. From what I understand, she didn’t marry the first guy “legally” and didn’t separate “legally” either.
From the other article on JW
“Omar married her first husband Hirsi in 2002 in a Muslim ceremony that, like many in the immigrant community, was not registered with the state.”
” Omar said she and Hirsi had separated in 2008, and because their faith-based union was never recognized by law, neither is their separation.”
If two people live together as husband and wife, tell others that they are such, and the union lasts a certain time…dictated by the State in which they reside…it is “common law marriage.”
If her “marriage” to hirsi was considered “common law,” then she is not just an adulterer, but is also a bigamist. A fraud and a liar. A cheat and a scoundrel. And bigamy is a crime, lying to Congress is a crime…and she did that too.
Wellington says
This photo of the fifth columnist, Omar, confirms again that a picture is worth a thousand words.
Note especially the eyes. They’re reptilian eyes or shark eyes, which is to say dead eyes.
Fitting since Islam deadens so much whenever and wherever it can. One only has to look at the 56 majority Islamic nations for this, especially if one detracts from these 56 nations all technology invented by the West and used by a world, the Islamic world, which never on its own would have invented any of this technology.
Islam is a recipe for the closing of the mind. By now one knows this or should know this. When I see an hijabed woman in a car, a skull-cap Muslim using a cell phone, Muslims in free Western nations demanding respect and freedoms for Islam when they pay no respect, or grant few if any right, to non-Muslims in Muslim-majority nations, etc., I always think the same thing—what a parasite.
I want to be very clear, crystal clear. Here it is: EVERY Muslim in a Western nation is a parasite, only the degree functioning as a variable.
I despise Islam. Why doesn’t most everyone by now? It is putrid through and through.
.Bridgette says
Agree. Well said.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
Thank you for directing that question to me. You of course know the answer even though you refuse to admit it. So long as Islam is regarded as a legitimate religion, it will – despite its evil doctrine – receive the respect that most Americans have for religions.
You understand Islam because you have studied it, but few will study it unless there is good reason to do so. Challenging Islam’s claim to be a religion would of course generate more study of Islam. As you know Islam cannot withstand scrutiny.
gravenimage says
What? Wellington did not direct any question directly to you, Terry Gain. If your want to address his points, though, this is fine.
Your constant demands that we–somehow–change the meaning of our language for Muslims makes no sense, though. Islam is indeed a religion–it is just an evil one.
I also think there is ample reason to study Islam. I took up its study two days after 9/11, to see if the Qur’an truly had any violent content, as some asserted. I soon found out just how true this was, and extended my study to the Hadith, Sira, and Tafsir. I also learned more about the Qur’an, including its salient chronology.
I welcome more people studying the threat of Islam, and would do so even if they were only doing so in order to see if Islam is really a religion or not.
Wellington says
Ditto.
Giacomo Latta says
I seriously doubt if any legislation passed in the West prior to 2001 that used the word ”religion” had anything like Islam in mind. Although there is no shortage of idiots in the West I doubt if any human rights legislation was worried about preserving the ”rights” of muslims to practise their declared orthodoxy: slitting throats, beating women, taking slaves, sex- or otherwise. The references were to religions who were like Christianity or within Christianity: people wearing funny clothes, performing funny rituals but otherwise not being harmful to anyone except occasionally themselves.
Thanks to the belief that Islam is a religion our human rights laws specify that if you are a Jew or a Christian you cannot refuse to hire a muslim just because he wants to slit your throat. This is total lunacy that no one not of the left should be supporting.
Wellington says
Terry: I have read Giacomo Latta’s comment and while I, like you, detest Islam, it has been my point all along that the freedom of religion clause (freedom of speech clause too) in the First Amendment COVERS ALL religions, including the iniquitous, freedom-destroying Islam. What the First Amendment does not cover is certain actions based on religious belief (e.g., death for apostasy).
We can’t start saying that, oh, if only those who wrote the First Amendment, which became part of the Constitution in 1791, knew Islam really well they would have made an exception and not had Islam covered. Really? This is a route to chaotic constitutional law—and unnecessary. What is necessary is describing Islam as an EVIL RELIGION, one that is inimical to many of the basic principles of America and all of Western Civilization. It should be protected as are Marxism and Nazism as a belief system but just like Marxism and Nazism Mo’s warped creed should not be allowed to exercise many of its dictates in a free Western country—polygamy, death for apostasy, harm or death to those who criticize Mohammed or the Koran, et al.
Again, pursuing the “Islam is not a religion” approach is a dead-end approach. Rather, if only Islam were seen as a religion all right but an iniquitous one, freedom would be secure, Muslims would rightly feel ostracized and marginalized and laws could be passed restricting Muslim immigration because the freedom of religion clause of the First Amendment DOES NOT MEAN we have to let into America people who believe in a malevolent religion. I keep trying to convey to you that if only Islam were seen for what it is, evil, recognizing it as a religion would be of little to no consequence.
gravenimage says
Giacomo, the First Amendment were passed after we had already begun to face the savagery of the Barbary pirates. The idea that no one in the United States had ever heard of Islam at the time is mistaken.
Giacomo Latta says
GI,
While I was not there, I seriously doubt that at the time of the drafting of the US constitution the founding fathers were so worldly as to worry about the religious beliefs of their enemies for fear that if some time later these enemies should become friends they might feel free to practise their religion as they choose.
I suspect rather that in order to find some common ground that could unite them against the still mighty British they would have to tolerate each others sects rather than each other’s religion, to wit, the same religion, Christianity. No doubt some told of their sects that dressed only in black and white who insisted everyone else was going to hell. Others told of a group keen on having many wives because God had buried such approval in the ground of upstate New York. Add to that Amish, probably Hutterites and Mennonites too and you have a sea of sects. No wonder freedom of ”religion” was on the agenda. I seriously doubt that Barbery pirates were ever on the agenda.
Wellington says
Terry: Please see my expansive reply to gravenimage’s 7:13 P.M. post.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
Please read Giacomo Latta’s comment immediately above yours and note the logic therein. Your approach is getting us nowhere. The notion that the evil ideology of Islam is protected by the First Amendment is bizarre. It is a prescription for the Islamization of America.
eduardo odraude says
Terry, why can’t a religion be totalitarian? Islam is totalitarian, but that doesn’t mean it is not a religion. Islam clearly involves a sincere (yet corrupt) belief in God and is therefore a kind of religion. True, it is a scam of a religion and a lie in so many ways, but US law intentionally refuses to distinguish between “true” and “false” religions. That’s the point of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law establishing…”
gravenimage says
Terry, people can believe whatever they want. But your constant implication that performing crimes in the name of Islam is legal in the US because of the First Amendment is mistaken.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“I want to be very clear, crystal clear. Here it is: EVERY Muslim in a Western nation is a parasite, only the degree functioning as a variable.”
I had to think about that one for a while, as I was trying to think of exceptions.
I could find none.
Every muslim in a Western nation, regardless of their degree of devotion to islam, at least supports it to some degree. And some to a very large degree.
Bottom line, I believe that you are correct in your statement…
Wellington says
Thank you, James.
gravenimage says
+1
heidi saucedo says
so glad to hear im not the only person saying and thinking that!
Pinkemenas gunrunner says
??
Northern Virginiastan says
I like the tawdry adultery gossip!
gravenimage says
Where Would Rep. Omar Get $250,000 for an Adultery Payoff to Ex?
……………
Good question. Probably misuse of campaign finances, and possibly even public monies. Glad someone is looking into this.
Brian Hoff says
Muslim gave her the 40 000 dollar. Which is legal in America.
Westman says
No, Brian, misuse of campaign funds, even if ALL from Muslims, is illegal. She has already been caught once.
https://nypost.com/2019/06/07/ilhan-omar-fined-for-campaign-finance-violations/
And it’s only going to get worse, She likely won’t be re-elected, her morality is outside the boundaries of Islam, and may not even finish her term.
Brian Hoff says
I didnot mean election money. There are other way to get money..
gravenimage says
Is that so? Is this that special Muslim-only fund again?
Or is he taking about Jizya now?
FYI says
Adultery..And she married her brother too ,Ahmed Elmi…
That’s muslim “morality” alright:but then that muslim ‘holy’ book ,the koran,is an instruction manual to violate every single one of the official commandments of the Actual God of Exodus 20.
{you’ll need to consult the Bible..allah even says to do so in koran 10:94 as allah conveniently ‘forgot’ to include a formal listing of them in his ‘holy’ book didn’t he?}
Perhaps omar and all those “devout” muslims think they are exempt from such laws as al LAH[“the BEST of deceivers” k3:54} the Two Right Handed,One shinned,linguistically-challenged ARAB god of islam gives permission to violate them in his ‘holy’ koran.
gravenimage says
Wait–is “Brian Hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–saying that Ilhan Omar had a special Muslims-only fund set up to pay hush money? This is a very strange claim.
Moreover, “DefenderofIslam’s” claim that use of campaign monies for personal use is legal so long as the donors approve is *quite* false:
“Personal use
Using campaign funds for personal use is prohibited.”
https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/making-disbursements/personal-use/
Doesn’t get much clearer than this. It figures that the appalling “DefenderofIslam”–who has said that Muslims will destroy the Constitution as soon as they can seize power here–knows nothing about democracy.
Peni Elika says
From the Demoncrat party or CAIR or George Soros, she has a lot of sources. Evil will do a lot to promote evil when that word “HATE” rules over them.
E T says
The Muslim Brotherhood hoods are funding a lot of collaborators in the West. Their theme song is no doubt “Bringing Down The House”, and they seem to be succeeding. This “Religion of War” has changed millions of lives and not for the good. I loathe anyone who supports any part of the oppression.
Cecil Jones says
Keep the truth coming. Muslim is trying to take over. If people can’t see this they have to have a simple mind. Wake up world and destroy this evil amongst us.
Terry Gain says
The only way to destroy Islam is to attack its claim that it is a legitimate religion. Conceding Islam’s fraudulent claim that it is a religion gives it a pass.
eduardo odraude says
Terry,
So the US government will now set up a Secretary of Religion who is given the authority to say what is and is not true religion? Or will the Supreme Court now be given the power to decide what is and is not “religion”? Or is it your thought that Congress will one day be persuaded to amend the Constitution to stipulate the First Amendment does not apply to Islam, because Islam is according to some people not a religion, and perhaps the First Amendment also does not apply to a whole list of other pseudo-religions, a list that some government committee will draw up?
Terry, what you demand would require official government authorities who promulgate an official definition of “religion.” Our government does not work that way. What you are demanding verges on theocracy. Our government is structured almost as a rejection of theocracy. It does not pronounce final definitions of a metaphysical sort, does it? Except perhaps, “all men are created equal, and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, and among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” or words to that effect.
Terry, what is your definition of “religion”? Can’t a religion be totalitarian?
gravenimage says
Exactly, Eduardo.
E T says
The way to destroy it in the West is to throw all Muslims out of office and never vote for one.
Mark Berlinger says
Serious inquiry into the Qur’an has revealed it to be completely fraudulent. Islam’s tenets are repackaged polytheism for Arab supremacists started by Abd al-Malik in 691, fifty-nine years after Muhammad died. The claim that Mecca is an ancient trade route city is a fabrication. The prophet’s first biography is 200 years too late. The current Qur’an wasn’t finished until 1924. Jay Smith is now exposing how the designs of seventh century coins betray Muslim claims of Islam’s beginnings.
FYI says
Consider too that ….
1]The Holy Spirit is absent in the koran and islam
{in fact allah gets the Christian Theology of the Trinity completely wrong see koran 5;116:Mary is NOT part of the Trinity and note that the Holy Spirit is MISSING}
2]The immoral teachings of the koran are completely at odds with the Exodus 20 laws
{the koran gives permission to murder k2;191,bear false witness k3:28 steal k48:20etc}
What was the point of YHWH giving the Law to Moses as revealed in the Torah and confirmed by Jesus in the Gospel only for “allah” to turn up in the 7th c AD and teach that it is OK to violate them?
3]The 2 CHIEF commandments of God{“The whole of the Law” according to Jesus Christ in Matthew 23 v 40 cannot be satisfied in islam if allah gives freedom to break the commandments{this violates Chief law #1 of Deut 6 :5-9}
and gives freedom NOT to love your neighbor{as he is an infidel see koran 5:51 and “the WORST of created beings” koran98:6 and islam’s Doctrine of HATE al walaa wal baraa}which is Chief law #2 of Lev 19:18
islam and the koran do NOT conform to the Biblical Judeo-Christian law of the 2 chief commandments plus the Exodus 20 {Decalogue} laws.
4}the Golden Rule is MISSING
Matthew 7 v 12 defined by Jesus as the MEANING of the Law of Moses and the teachings of the prophets.
And allah completely missed THAT?
allah MISSED “the meaning of the Law of Moses….”?
Biblical scholars and Christian apologists should notice how the Golden Rule is Missing in islam,the absence of the Holy Spirit{which neither allah nor muhamed appear to know about either through ignorance or else they don’t want muslims to know about it} and how islam/the koran does NOT conform to the Two chief commandments of God.
Where in islam is the First law of Deut 6:5-9?
Where in islam is the Second law of lev 19:18?
Why does the koran give permission to violate the Exodus 20 laws?
Where is the Golden Rule in islam?
Where is “love thy neighbor” in islam?
Where is the Holy Spirit ,God’s Wisdom and the source of prophecy in islam?
All these things are in the BIBLE{which at the time the koran was written down allah says is TRUE k3:3} and yet all these things are either MISSING or DENIED in the koran.
Nelson Abdullah says
Ilhan Omar professes to believe in Islam yet she commits adultery which is punishable by death according to her religion. Like other high ranking Democrats who seem to be above the law I wonder if Omar enjoys the same status.
Brian Hoff says
How many Christin do the same thing.
gravenimage says
Will “DefenderofIslam” here have her stoned to death once Muslims get into power? He has gloated over imposing Shari’ah law here before.
Infidel says
I’m particularly interested in what he thinks about her selling out her body to an infidel Tim Mynett: that’s about as blasphemous as handing Jerusalem over to the ‘Benjamins’
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
As a resident of Minnesota, I wanna tell you I’m happy and entertained by Rep Ilhan Omar’s D-MN saga. Just today a local Somali leader acknowledged her crime, if it *is* a crime in that it will never be prosecuted (that would be a political, Islamophobic and sexist prosecution).
Congrats to the two local daily newspapers up here for not publishing credible reports made by a St. Cloud blogger prior to her election. If the papers had done their journalistic duty, she never would’ve been elected and all this entertainment would’ve never come to pass.
I brought up the Ilhan marriage/fraud subject with a liberal the other day, he frowned at me and called me Islamophobic.
The big question is, what does Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez D-NY have to say on Ilhan’s woes?
Sue Evans says
I’m just wondering why if it is true that she was sleeping with someone other than her husband <aka being a sl**… why hasn't she been a victim of an honor killing ? she OBVIOUSLY is of no good charachter lol Why isn't her family disgusted with her. Her father, mother and family are obviously bad muslims to allow this to be publically discussed and known throughout the world. Just saying lmao!
Brian Hoff says
There are no official witness to the act. Her ex husband didnot sy anything aut it official.
Infidel says
True. But she’s been sleeping w/ an infidel named Tim Mynett. Wouldn’t she deserve to be stoned for that, as per shariah law?
OLD GUY says
Politicians on the left aways get away with these kind of morale character flaws and crimes with vary little coverage by the media. When you want to find the truth follow the MONEY. In her case you might want to look at the immigration fraud in getting her brother into this country.
somehistory says
/thewashingtonstandard.com/somali-community-leader-ilhan-omar-did-marry-her-brother-claims-she-would-do-what-she-had-to-do
Somali Community Leader: Ilhan Omar Did Marry Her Brother: Claims She Would “Do What She Had To Do To Get Him ‘Papers’ To Keep Him In US”
somehistory says
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/silicon-valley-sharia-apple-and-google-are-ilhan-omars-top-2020-campaign-donors-as-republicans-continue
Silicon Valley Sharia: Apple And Google Are Ilhan Omar’s Top 2020 Campaign Donors As Republicans Continue To Be Censored
Laura Loomer / September 3, 2019