Wherein Michelle Malkin expresses her anger and outrage that it is considered antisemitic to engage in Holocaust revisionism, accuse Jews of being more loyal to Israel than America, and to fearmonger about rich Jewish puppetmasters pic.twitter.com/DFr3OSzVcI
— דער יידישער ארבעטער (@JewishWorker) March 1, 2020
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Dear Michelle,
Suffice it to say that I am a long-time admirer of your work. So, when I learned that you were being tarred with the slanderous accusation of Holocaust-denial and or antisemitism because of your endorsement and defense of Nick Fuentes and his organization, America First, I immediately felt compelled to defend you.
Everyone and his uncle is being accused of antisemitism as a way to harm Trump. Even justified criticism of the committed anti-Jew, George Soros, is considered antisemitic. On the other hand, antisemites wrongly label him as a Zionist—a word used by antisemites as an epithet. In fact, the word Zionist denotes support for the state of Israel. Soros is clearly an anti-Zionist. He despises Israel and contributes billions of dollars annually to organizations that defame Israel and work for its destruction. So it is absurd to accuse those who criticize him of antisemitism.
These types of attacks tend to come from the neo-Marxist Left; but, unfounded accusations can also come from the Right, from which some of the attacks against you appear to originate. Regardless of the source, no way was I willing to buy into the calumny; no way was I going to remain silent as I watched your ability to speak at conservative fora be restricted or curtailed.
When I learned that you had been dismissed as a speaker for the Young America’s Foundation (YAF), and without delving deeper, my first thought was: Lies turn people against others; they awaken latent resentments or gestate new ones. This cannot happen to Michelle Malkin! You are too valuable a voice to lose. So I knew I had to do something.
However, to my embarrassment, I jumped to your defense without first having learned anything about Nick Fuentes. So I thought it absurd to accuse you of antisemitism or Holocaust denial. But it was only later that I encountered Fuentes’ so-called “tongue in cheek” discourse on Jews as “cookies”. It was only later that I realized that he and his many allies include ardent, self-identified Holocaust “revisionists” who preach an alternative history about World War II that is totally at odds with reality.
It is my understanding that this whole dispute about you and Fuentes began with a statement made at two venues by Charlie Kirk, director of Turning Point USA (TPUSA). He proposed that foreign students at American universities should have Green Cards stapled to their diplomas to which you responded:
“I was flabergasted to hear…Charlie Kirk telling students at a university campus lecture…that ‘We should staple a green card behind your diploma.’ He repeated this nonsense at Ohio State University during a ‘Culture War’ tour stop this week, asserting that any foreign national who graduates from any ‘four-year college’ should get a green card if any ‘American employer needs to fill a job.’ So much for [Trump’s] America First. Kirk’s proposal is even more extreme than Silicon Valley tech lobbyists’ pet project because [Kirk] doesn’t just want to inundate the IT job market with low-wage Chinese, Indians, Koreans, Sudanese, ‘or whatever.’ He wants to open the floodgates in all labor markets, whether or not there is a purported labor shortage.”
Kirk’s retraction and apology were swift. He admitted that he was wrong and that should have been the end of it. But now he and his organization are “in the midst of a complex fragmentation war within the MAGA community as many young conservatives view TPUSA as social liberals using Trump branding to secure power and influence.”
Nick Fuentes and his America First are at the center of this conflict. Their hard line position on immigration and social issues presents a mighty challenge to Kirk and TPUSA. America First is gathering steam fast, and, according to Fuentes, many TPUSA members are crossing over. America First refers to TPUSA as “Conservative Inc.”
Unfortunately, you find yourself caught in the middle—at least, that is how I hope you find yourself. After all, it is easier to find your way out of this quagmire from the middle rather than from a co-dependency on Fuentes. That is, if you have not already whole heartedly aligned yourself with the rabid, Jew-hating, ignorant, jeering and heckling mob that is Nick Fuentes’ America First. Or does his hard line position on immigration justify your alignment with Jew haters? And they are Jew-haters in the extreme.
They are young, idealistic, justifiably opposed to globalism, advocating for American sovereignty and identity, secure borders, Trump supporters–nothing wrong there. But what do the Jews have to do with any of that? Some Jews agree with their agenda, some disagree, just as the votaries of any other ethnicity agree and disagree.
Well, it all comes down to this: There are just too many (damn) Jews manipulating the government and that includes Israel! So are they talking about ZOG? Surely they are not the first to claim that America languishes in the grip of Zionist Occupied Government, and will not be the last. Some put it more politely: Jews have too much influence. Unfortunately, the libel is as enduring as Hitler’s legacy which Fuentes and fans, evidently, seek to propel into the next generation. So, I should not have been shocked to discover an article written by a Fuentes fan entitled, America First vs. Holocaustian Mind-Control.
America First has acquired a large following on college campuses. Fuentes calls his followers Groypers. They have developed the habit of heckling and otherwise disrupting the speeches of Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro and other conservatives who deviate from their America First catechism which, in addition to a hard line on immigration, is anti-gay, anti-Israel, anti-Jew, and probably anti-many other things of which I am not aware.
In a video that went viral, Fuentes compared the 6 million plus Jews murdered in the Holocaust to cookies baking in an oven. He was skeptical of the logistics and launched into a long rant ridiculing the ovens, the smoke stacks, and the people, concluding that…no…6 million? No way! At most, 250,000!
“…if I take one hour to cook a batch of cookies and Cookiemonster has 15 ovens working 24 hours a day, every day for five years, how long does it take Cookiemonster to make six-million batches of cookies? I don’t know. That’s a good question. That doesn’t sound really correct to me. Wait a second. It takes one hour to build a batch of cookies, and you have 15 ovens—probably in four different kitchens, right?—doing 24 hours a day every day for five years. How long would it take you to make six-million? Hm. I don’t know. It certainly wouldn’t be five years, right? The math doesn’t seem to add up there. The math doesn’t quite seem to add up there. I don’t think you’d result in six-million. Maybe 200 to 300 thousand cookies? And I think the Red Cookie Association said something like that, probably like 200-300 thousand cookies baked, probably. And in addition, you know, in this hypothetical I imagine that if you took aerial photographs over the kitchens, you would need to see certain smokestacks to release the smoke from baking the cookies, and the smokestacks would project certain shadows—but I guess they’re not visible in the aerial photographs taken over the kitchens. Moreover if you look at the soil texture, it’s really not deep enough for mass cookie-storage underground.”
But assuming the reasonableness of Fuentes’ erudite substitution of cookies for Jews, and the legitimacy of his doubt about 6 million of them fitting into an oven, did you care to notice the prolonged viciousness, cruelty, and callousness of his discourse? I already confessed to you that I came to your defense before watching his viral “cookie” video. But after seeing it, I wondered how you could have tolerated it any more than I? I can only suppose that you never saw it and defended him blindly, as I was inclined to defend you.
He has subsequently made other videos, equally vicious, equally disrespectful of the humanity of Jews, and the veracity of their tragic history, to wide acclaim and approbation. Should we be surprised? Not really. Jew-hatred always finds a generous audience, and Fuentes’ popularity is growing. His hatred of Jews does not seem to have hurt him. Nor has he demonstrated any inclination to moderate his rhetoric. Why should he? There has been no price for him to pay.
In response to criticism of your support for Nick Fuentes, you stated that you did not agree with him and that, to the contrary, you believe the Holocaust did occur. Although you deserve some credit for disagreeing, is it really a matter of opinion?
Consider: Wouldn’t you be the object of vicious, condescending mirth, for your Candide-like naiveté, if you said, in all sincerity, that you really do believe that World War II occurred? Or the Civil War? Or slavery in America? Or the volcanic explosion in Pompeii? Or the 1979 earthquake in California? Or the assassination of JFK? Or the moon landing? These things all occurred. What does your belief have to do with anything unless you can shed doubt on their occurrence? Stating a truism in terms of sincere belief only transforms it into the subject of doubt…and/or leading to justified ridicule of the person who stated it.
When confronted with a Nick Fuentes and his many minions, one can see how easy it is to move the needle from the recognition of an immutable fact, to a belief, to doubt, to compromise and, finally, to negation. He is an influencer. No question that he has convinced youth, who never in their lives even heard of the Holocaust, to believe that it never happened. Imagine his impact on young people who have already been programmed to hate Jews even before he got to them!
Consider: What is the goal of Holocaust denial? Why should anyone want to deny it? I’ll tell you. If Hitler did not kill 6 million “cookies” and the Jews are lying about it, the Jews are the perpetrators of World War II, because the accusation of the 6 million “baked” was a pretext for….Fill in the blanks: the establishment of the state of Israel, war and profit, world domination, Zionist Occupied Government (ZOG), the banks, the house of Rothschild, and on and on. The possibilities are endless.
I personally have encountered people (Jew-haters among them, but not all) who sincerely, but mistakenly, believe that the US entered the war to save the Jews from Hitler. So, if the Holocaust is a Jewish lie, doesn’t that mean that the Jews tricked the United States into entering the war? And look how much power they have! They really do control the government—and not just our government! And now maybe Hitler wasn’t such a bad guy after all. In fact, maybe he was not the victimizer that history portrays him to have been, but a victim himself. Maybe Hitler was one of the many victims of the “Jews and their Lies”. Have you ever seen that as a headline? I have.
“The Jews and their Lies” was a pamphlet written by Martin Luther. He was a rabid, foaming at the mouth Jew-hater. Just like Nick Fuentes. But, that did not hurt Luther at all. He led a mass movement. An entire religion is named in his honor. I have no doubt that Fuentes intends to lead a mass movement as well. But, despite his pro-American rhetoric, he will shred the Constitution. Clearly he does not believe that “all men are created equal.” No one who leaves Jews out of the equation can possibly believe it.
So is he really on your side, Michelle? Clearly he intends to weaken, cripple, and fracture whatever solidarity constitutional conservatives in the freedom movement, such as yourself, share? Of them, many are Jews.
Michelle, you attacked Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA on the immigration issue because he advocated automatic Green Cards for foreign students in American universities. You made no allowance for him even though you probably “agree with him on some things and disagree on others”—no different than the justification of your defense of Fuentes. Why does Charlie get no credit—especially since he apologized for the opinion you denounced? And why does Nick Fuentes get a pass despite his vile opinions about the Jews for which he will never apologize, and cannot, without turning on his base? I urge you to consider whether you were a bit harsh with Charlie and more than a bit lenient with Nick. I certainly wonder about it.
A hallmark of demagoguery is the demand for total thought conformity. Could it be that you are supporting a demagogue who harbors the latent tendencies of a tyrant? With his huge following, he certainly has the potential to become a tyrant. I cited above an article by one of Fuente’s fans attributing mind control powers to the Holocaust—or to those who affirm that it occurred? Not clear on that one. But, it’s really the other way around. Nick’s followers have been mind-controlled to believe lies—lies about the Jews, lies about many things—not least of which is the lie that it is pro-American to behave like a sneering, jeering savage when someone disagrees with you; not least of which is to prevent others from hearing the speaker they showed up to hear.
How is his movement different from Antifa? Indeed, whether coordinated or not, the two movements support one another against TPUSA which is defending itself from both. With Antifa from the Left, America First from the Right, TPUSA is caught in a pincer formation. If Fuentes cares so much about America, wouldn’t it have been wiser to align with TPUSA against Antifa? Yes, I am questioning Nick’s motives.
He brags about chasing Charlie Kirk off campus. The goal is to prevent him from speaking…anywhere. Witness the title of this article. Groyper War: Charlie Kirk Gets Squashed Like an Insect in Houston! Is that what you stand for? I don’t think so.
Michelle, I see you as proud, pugnacious, unambiguous, and brave—qualities notably missing in action in your response to Fuentes. Instead, you stand up to his detractors as though they were the vicious haters. Jews certainly ought to question your defense of him and his attacks on them.
It is true that Leftist Jews jump to vilify any conservative. Incomprehensibly, their abortion rights pre-empt their right to stay alive. Maybe Nick thinks all Jews side with the neo-Marxist Left. Maybe he thinks all Arabs love peace and hate bloodshed. Maybe he thinks Jews control the UN, the media, the banks, and everything he covets. I don’t know his mind. But, I have to believe my eyes and ears. I know what I saw and heard. If you can stand up to Charlie Kirk on immigration policy you don’t agree with, I submit that you can stand up to Nick Fuentes. Or, do you know something about him that I don’t?
Nothing in the world is easier than to trash the Jews. Look how Fuentes captured the Jew-hating imagination of his followers, or inspired it where it was absent before. The Jews suffer from a paucity of defenders. You will always find more people who hate them than people who like them—the result of many centuries of defamation and slander. So courage comes into this equation—the courage to stand with the Jews because of the overwhelming hatred heaped upon them by people like Nick Fuentes and his growing movement.
Your stated belief that the Holocaust occurred earns you no medal of valor—except from Jew haters and Holocaust deniers who praise you for defending Nick Fuentes. Your belief simply reflects a truism that Nick Fuentes denies.
But the attack on Truth overpowers the denial–a denial that is weak and ineffective, certainly by the standards of Nick’s followers who shamelessly cheer him on. In this case, the lies, eventually, will prevail, and, thanks to this perpetual process of attack and denial, the Holocaust will, in time, be relegated to the memory hole with all other discarded beliefs. That is the aim of all Holocaust denial. It is information warfare against the Jews. I beg you not to be part of it.
Just as this process is in play to destroy the Jews in America, it is, likewise, equally in play to destroy America itself, but on innumerable fronts. I urge you to reject the false presumptions imposed on you, no matter the domain. A stern rebuke of the foolish, young, and dangerous Jew-hater with a large contingent of like-minded, malleable, and manipulatable fans would surely make you deserving of that medal of valor, and a world of respect from the many Jews among your admirers.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Jones
sheliak says
This unctuous post boils down to a well worn threat. Get on the right side or we will destroy you.
Tony Porcaro says
Nonsense!
Ugha says
What ‘threat’? She wrecked her own self. She sounds like a Jew bashing harridan
Tom W Harris says
FOAD, Nazi filth.
gravenimage says
What absolute tosh. How is either Vanessa Jones thoughtful letter threatening Michelle Malkin?
Tony Porcaro says
What is a country? A country is what it stands for, when standing for something is most difficult. This is what we stand for: justice, truth, and the value of a single human being. ( from “Justice at Nuremberg”)
Seth says
TL;DR.
What’s the beef? Usually Michelle Malkin gets it absolutely right.
Roland says
Michelle Malkin is a fallible human being. She suffers from pride, one of the seven cardinal sins enumerated by the Catholic Church.
LB says
I’m actually familiar with the story because I follow Nick Fuentes and the drama around him, mostly for the memes.
Basically, Michele Malkin got grilled for standing up to Nick’s defense when every single person on the Left and Right denounced him as “racist”, “Nazi” and other classic un-personing insults (which is a common Leftist tactic by the way). Now I’ve never heard of the person writing the article, but it appears she is a huge Michelle fan while also being a huge Nick hater. So in this… manifesto (?), she expresses her displeasure for her idol’s approval of a notorious “jew-hating white supremacist” (whose last name is Fuentes).
About Nick Fuentes: He is a self-described “paleo-conservative”, in other words, old pre-WWII type of Christian conservative that does not approve of many of today’s immoralities that are commonplace in society such as: masturbation, sex before marriage, homosexuality (and all other LGBT perversions), etc. He is also a strong opponent to immigration, both legal and illegal. But he is most notoriously known for two things: 1) his struggle to strengthen the white race, and 2) his displeasure of Jews having too much influence over USA’s politics and society. Now granted, reading it like that sounds like he really is a jew-hating white supremacist, but that’s just the surface layer that media (and other public persons) like to point out. If you dive deeper into what he’s saying, it’s not that simple and makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
So about “strengthening white race”: What he is advocating for is simply increasing young (in their twenties) marriage unions between white people and having more white children (instead of the usual 1.2 and declining child per a white woman) so as to not let the white race become extinct among the ever increasing number of “minorities”. The only “controversial” stance he has is being against interracial marriages, which isn’t really controversial at all since most of the “minorities” do the same. That’s it! But the media will have you believe that he want’s all non-whites killed or shipped out of US which couldn’t be further from the truth.
About his “Jew-hating”: It’s a bit more complicated, but his main gripe with the Jews is the fact that fake “conservatives” like Charlie Kirk and his TPUSA are funded by various lobbyists and organisations of Jewish origin. There is also the fact that he is America First (as is the name of his movement), meaning that he is for cancelling ALL foreign aid to any country and that includes the billions going to Israel. The most “controversial” thing he said is the “cookie” metaphor, but that was a tongue-in-cheek joke intended to intentionally raise eyebrows and divert attention to himself. Many people (including the author above) have interpreted this as his way of denying the Holocaust, which is also untrue. He recognizes it (in full number), but purposely makes jokes about it because nothing should be off-limits when it comes to comedy.
That’s the gist of it in the shortest way I could explain (even though it’s super long). It’s best if you hear it all from the man himself on a show run by another un-personed GAY JEWISH public figure who married to a BLACK GUY. I’m of course talking about Milo Yiannopoulos. It’s not Nick’s best representation since the majority of the focus is on Milo, but it’s a start to anyone interested in finding the truth for themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9Rtr922ENg
LB says
Maybe I should’ve posted this video instead, but here is Nick’s perspective on Michele Malkin and her “controversial” support for him. Don’t worry, most people who denounce him will never see this or acknowledge anything he’s saying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNFBxljNSJ4
Kepha says
Is Michelle Malkin defending Holocaust denial, or is she defending free speech?
This is an important quetion for me. For one, my father’s family was Jewish, and he lost many relatives in the Shoah. I’ve broken with certain conservative groups because they push Holocaust revisionism. But I’m also aware that the Left is on the warpath to stifle any and all questioning or opposition to their narratives. Defending a Holocaust denier’s right to speak, odious though he may be, also defends our right to criticize Islam and lay out its truly odious beliefs before the public.
I also understand that Michelle Malkin’s husband is Jewish. It would surprise me that she would align herself with anti-Semitism.
somehistory says
Your response is more than reasonable. Defending the “right” to say whatever one thinks, is truly important, even when that one says something really vile. Everyone has the right of free speech or no one has it.
It’s much like the court defense of a serial killer, raper of children, or some such vile criminal. He gets the same “due process” and a right to counsel that the innocent should receive when falsely accused.
I’ve never heard Michelle Malkin say anything against Jews or Israel, nor have I ever read any such thing. I admit, I could have missed it, but that seems contrary to type.
Terry Gain says
Kepha
Why would Malkin defend the obviously false speech of Fuentes? And Malkin is obviously not just supporting free speech when she defends Fuentes who is shutting down the free speech of Charlie Kirk. Fuentes seems like a right wing version of antifa.
Artist says
“defending fee speech” is the ridiculous excuse Tulsi Gabbard gave for co-sponsoring Ilhan Omar’s pro BDS bill in Congress.
As far as MM’s husband being Jewish, that doesn’t seem to make a lot of difference as evidenced by Bernie Sanders and his view that Israel is racist, and the view he shares with Fuentes to cut aid to Israel, although he would give it to the ” palestinians”. Sadly, many Jews now might fit the definition of “ant-Semite”.
gravenimage says
I support free speech, including for antisemites. That does not mean that one does not have the right to criticize such speech, though.
somehistory says
Free speech is for everyone, including those who tell the Truth and call attention to the lies others tell, the insults, the threats, although in this time we are living, many don’t wish to allow others that “right.”
Some things are hard to hear, especially lies; many things that moslims and those others who hate Christians and Jews spout are outright lies. No one wants to be lied about, or to. The insults and lies can be downright disgusting, but if we demand that they not say those things, then the same is demanded of us when speaking Truth.
Of course, those who lie are also the ones making the most demands on this issue.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Somehistory,
Paul says
All I can say is that it is very confusing, and I would never say that a country should not exist as that is not my decision to make. Also Many Jews and others were tortured to death and I don’t know anything about numbers of people but it was many millions of all different kinds.
Basically any that were not of the desired appearance, religion, and political beliefs were put to death. Someone with disabilities or anyway by their twisted vision was not exactly what they desired was also put to death. This was an offshoot of the idea of eugenics of creating a better race, and different people have different ideas about what the perfect race is and they are all wrong.
We should not have allowed Henry Ford to go to Germany and Russia as we have been paying for it ever since it happened.
What needs to happen is a complete accounting of all that happened and not hide anything as I agree we should never allow such a thing as the holocaust to happen ever again. I remember that there were many Jews put on German ships and they were sunk by the British and other such atrocities, and the USA and other countries refused to allow educated Jews into their countries and preferred that they go back to their death and this is unacceptable.
I don’t just pass the blame on Germany, but many countries around the world that did nothing to help these people and far fewer would have died if they were treated fairly and as humans. None should be treated like that, nor should a country allow its self to be destroyed by immigrants that are unwilling to be a part of it either.
A solution could have easily been found more than two decades earlier and WW2 prevented if certain people would have looked for what is best for all instead to their own greed resulting in over 85million dead. Sadly these same people are controlling many countries today still and causing suffering and death.
Islam is a threat because of the way that it is used as a tool to destroy other faiths. Also these books do help greatly in understanding how this is possible, and sadly how a pale white guy with slaves could be seen as a dark skinned great Prophet is confusing to me.
Larry A. Singleton says
“All I can say is that it is very confusing”
This sums it up perfectly for me. When plugging one of Michelle’s books or articles it’s sometimes “Michelle (The hottest woman on the planet) Malkin”.
She can do no wrong as far as I’m concerned. So when I saw this crap about her I pushed the pause button.
I skimmed through a couple of articles the other day and decided to print out and read as much of this issue as possible, attacking them with pen and hi-liter, taking notes. Because, for me, that’s what it’s all about: Studying The ISSUES.
I printed the above article out as well and will read this and the others tomorrow in my “morning reading” along with my new “morning paper” FrontPage Magazine.
I have a feeling that Michelle will come out as unblemished as ever.
John says
First of all the holocaust happened. Secondly at least 6 million Jews were murdered as were many other people who’s live was seen as being less worthy by the NAZIS. Regardless of what other nations did or did not do, the holocaust is still a crime against humanity. Henry Ford was needed by the Germans to commit the holocaust.
Yes Islam is a totalitarian ideology that uses people very much the same way as the NAZIS used the average German population. And one way was to dehumanize the Jews and present them as the evil that needs to be fought. By calling those murdered Jews “cookies” the dehumanizing process is starting again which must best stopped. The same is true for Islam where Jews and Christians are referred to as apes, pigs and dogs.
Steve says
I sure hope Michelle puts as much distance as she can from these Jew haters.
Roland says
Thank you, Vanessa. The Holocaust only happened 75 years ago, but people have forgotten it or never learned about it in the first place. America is great partly because of the extraordinary contributions of its Jews. I would love to know where Fuentes gets his money.
Knights Templar says
Kinda reminds me of the Trotskyist polemics of the 1970s, i.e., Workers League vs. the Socialist Workers Party.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
The name “Fuentes” put me in mind of a line from Lope de Vega: “Y quién es Fuenteovejuna, señor?” Completely off topic, of course.
Otherwise, I learned that Vanessa Jones is intelligent, Michelle Malkin is a dope, and Fuentes a double-dope. Should one bother with the pathologically idiotic? Aren’t there bigger fish to fry, what with the Qur’an assuring us that Muslims are the “best of peoples” and non-Muslims “the most vile of created beings”?
zonulin says
Fuentes’ followers are a huge concern to me, just as is Antifa. And that many are college students? I’m shocked, honestly. Vanessa absolutely hits the nail on the head. I really hope Michelle, who is a dynamo, can heed her words.
TrueFreeThinker says
One thing is certain: jewish privilege is number one above any and all other privileges and that cannot be denied.
Free speech unless of course you ask a question that delineates from the narrative.
In all my years I’ve seen and read about many people being destroyed because they dare ask a question about some of the events pertaining to jewish people in Europe during ww2.
I seriously wonder where all the 6 millions bodies were buried – l guess I’ll be the next to be destroyed for daring to ask such a question.
gravenimage says
What a moron.
Stephen Henderson says
There are none so blind as those who will not see. What an idiot!
Larry A. Singleton says
It’s late and I’m tired but I’m going to give this a shot anyway. Because this is one issue that means a lot to me.
I hope this is tongue in cheek or some kind of a joke from “Hugh Fitzgerald”(?) saying that “Michelle Malkin is a dope”. Michelle is one of my go-to gals on the issues just like Caroline Glick.
I responded to someone’s earlier comment who said:
“All I can say is that it is very confusing”
I went on to say:
This sums it up perfectly for me….
I skimmed through a couple of articles the other day and decided to print out and read as much of this issue as possible, attacking them with pen and hi-liter, taking notes. Because, for me, that’s what it’s all about: Studying The ISSUES.
I printed the above article out as well and will read this and the others tomorrow in my “morning reading” along with my new “morning paper” FrontPage Magazine.
End
I truly believe that this is what separates the men form the boys; Conservatives from Democrats and those who vote Democrat; Knowledge. Studying The ISSUES.
I’ve got this guy I go back and forth with on Fakebook and he can’t address a single “ISSUE” I bring up to save his life. He’s a Trump basher who can’t quote or cite a single article or book to back up his bullshit and when he did submit some “literature” it was from one of these hack “fact-checking” sites ala the SPLC “hate group” list. That was it.
I’ve discovered over the years that these people simply don’t read. It’s as plain and simple as that. End of story. No more to be said, That’s it. The End…. …..Period.
I’ll be more specific. They don’t read BOTH sides of the ISSUES. That is they don’t study both sides of the issues. And they’ve told me as much themselves when I’ve suggest they read Robert Spencer, Daniel Greenfield or David Horowitz:
“I wouldn’t read anything written by…..”
Fill in the blank.
They’re like clones. They all sound the same. Every one of ’em.
I love taking these guys on.
And I notice on these comment features where you see 20, 40, 50 and sometimes more responses….I get next to none. And I go and light a fire under these people’s asses All The Time.
And what’s so fun is I’m one of the dumbest people I know. Except for one thing. I love to read.
And they don’t.
And I think it’s even deeper; It’s a bout Right and Wrong. Do the right thing. Do Unto Others and all those things that form…..Character.
The most depressing thing for me is the sheer number of kids in this country who lack character.
I keep comparing these whiny little punks with those kids who even lied about their ages to volunteer to fight in World War II.
I think about Audie Murphy (I’ve got a neat story about him) who was barely out of his teens and who held off, what was it? An entire tank division? And God knows how many German soldiers.
And he wasn’t the exception. He was the rule.
I was a long haired hippie who finally joined the Navy. I stayed drunk and stoned the whole time.
And I don’t think it was the Navy that finally straightened me out so much as it was that Greatest Generation always seeming to be there, looking over my shoulder and whispering…”Do the right thing” “Do Unto Others”.
How smart or dumb do you have to be to get these simple basics? I’ll just never get it.
ET says
Thank you
Rebecca says
Nick Fuentes seems to have crossed the demarcation line between democratic-republicanism and totalitarianism. Plus, if you believe Jews have too much power and want to do something about it, his way is not the right way to go about it.
gravenimage says
A Letter to Michelle Malkin: I urge you to rethink your defense of a Jew-hater and Holocaust-denier
………………………..
I love Michelle Malkin, and am really sorry to hear this.
Robert says
TPUSA gets multi-million dollar backing, and it spokesmen like Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens visit the White House, and they host the Trump family at events….. whereas most people have never heard of Fuentes or AFPAC.
And yet this silly article tries to gaslight us into thinking of Kirk as a defenceless child being steamrollered by… a 19 year old who makes Youtube videos (literally) in his house!?
This is absurd.
I stand with Michelle, and I regard TPUSA as warmongering, open-borders grifters.
TrueFreeThinker says
You apparently refuse think for yourself, so of course you believe it.
Everyone is allowed to be criticized, questioned, critiqued about every and anything except one group of people. If that’s not privilege then l don’t know what is.
gravenimage says
What is “TrueFreeThinker” saying is false about this story?
Ryan M. says
I decided to investigate the “anti-Jew, Holocaust-denier” claims I’ve been hearing against Michelle Malkin in relation to Nick Fuentes (whom I’ve never heard of before) since I’ve only heard positive things from Malkin.
I share this article with all to read:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/11/nicholas-j-fuentes-is-not-a-holocaust-denier/
gravenimage says
Thanks for the link.