The Christchurch shootings killed 51 people at mosques nearly a year ago. Easter jihad bombings killed 259 people in Sri Lanka. The genocide of Christians in Africa continues, as does the persecution of Christians in the Middle East. Yet persecuted Christians are dismissed, while the dreadful massacre in Christchurch isn’t. Why the difference? In New Zealand:
“Muslim women leaders have called on the security forces to extend their intelligence gathering of the alt right and white supremacists both here and overseas. It was one of a raft of recommendations from the Islamic Women’s Council to the Royal Commission into the mosque attacks.”
Jihad terror is the biggest threat in the world today, but to point out this fact is frowned upon, and to investigate ways to stop the advancing jihad is “Islamophobic,” even though jihad is rooted in hatred of the infidel. Last August, Global News in Canada reported that Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale also said “the federal government is ‘concerned’ about white supremacy leading to acts of terror within Canada and abroad.”
But the Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s latest annual report said extremists inspired by ISIS and Al Qaeda were “the number one national security threat to public safety in this country.”
It doesn’t stop with Canada. Recall the words of Ilhan Omar when she addressed the Council on American Islamic Relations last year:
“Here’s the truth. For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I’m tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it. Cair was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”
Those “some people who did something” were Muslims who murdered close to 3000 people and injured 6000 more.
If any intelligence gathering is needed, it should be on mosques, which are often funded by Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Iran (which is said to be turning mosques into “terror command centers“).
“Islamic Women’s Council say police and spy agencies ‘failed’ to protect Muslims,” Stuff NZ, March 9, 2020:
Muslim women leaders have called on the security forces to extend their intelligence gathering of the alt right and white supremacists both here and overseas.
It was one of a raft of recommendations from the Islamic Women’s Council to the Royal Commission into the mosque attacks.
They said in their submission, shared exclusively with RNZ’s Insight programme, there was also a need for a robust whole-of-government approach to preventing extremism focused on strengthening connections within vulnerable groups.
The council’s Aliya Danzeisen said rather than continuing to put huge amounts into surveillance, support was needed to build societies so that communities did not feel isolated and disenfranchised and individuals weren’t tempted into extremism.
“This is not just for the Muslim community. You would find it now very openly with people who are feeling isolated, related to the white supremacy movements that are out there and impacting on us,” Danzeisen said.
The Islamic Women’s Council has also called for the urgent introduction of a safe system to report hate speech and crime and for that system to be linked to security agencies’ databases.
They also want that system to be connected to gun licence applications and renewals. If someone has engaged in serious hate speech or crimes, they should not be eligible for gun ownership and all licences should be for two years, rather than the current 10, the council says.
The overall submission stated: “The public service including police and security agencies has failed dramatically not protecting the Muslim community.”
It documented repeated failings to take the warnings about growing Islamophobia seriously enough.
Now the council’s leaders want reforms of the public sector and personal apologies from the person at the top of the public service, the State Services Commissioner to both them, the Muslim community and the country as a whole….
Michael Copeland says
It was, was it not, alt-right and white supremacists who shot all those assembled muslims in Afghanistan a few days ago?
PRCS says
And in Sri Lanka.
Rob says
..and poor 8 year-old Saffi Roussos blown up at Manchester Arena
PRCS says
Given the past, and looking forward: a never ending list.
Tim says
The Sick CULT FROM HELL – ISLAM is Obviously trying to Deflect from their Acts of MAS MURDER , MASS RAPE , CHILD MOLESTATION . You would think these Islamists Taught the NAZI’S how to be ANTI SEMETIC BARBARIANS
Christian Indeed says
So basically, anyone opposing jihadi violence should be refused a gun licence?(define*serious* hate speech from a Muslim’s pov?)
And the more this element of society gets in positions of influence, the more that point of view changes in their favour.
It’s all part of the plan to have as little opposition as possible to the coming violent Jihad.
Istvan Vogel says
I’m delighted that a Muslim organisation wants tough legislation on “hate speech”. First of all, it would be good to have a definition of what exactly “hate speech” is. There might be the odd religious book here and there that contain examples. Should those books be banned? Should they be destroyed if found? Should the importers be sued for importing “hate speech” books and should the publishers be sued likewise?
mortimer says
Hate speech … The Koran’s 164 Jihad Verses: K 2:178-179, 190-191, 193-194, 216-218, 244; 3:121-126, 140-143, 146, 152-158, 165-167,169, 172-173, 195; 4:71-72, 74-077, 84, 89-91, 94-95,100-104; 5:33, 35, 82; 8:1, 5, 7, 9-10, 12, 15-17, 39-48, 57-60, 65-75; 9:5, 12-14, 16, 19-20, 24-26, 29, 36, 38-39, 41, 44, 52, 73, 81, 83, 86, 88, 92, 111, 120, 122-123; 16:110; 22:39, 58, 78; 24:53, 55; 25:52; 29:6, 69; 33:15, 18, 20, 23, 25-27, 50; 42:39; 47:4, 20, 35; 48:15-24; 49:15; 59:2, 5-8, 14; 60:9; 61:4, 11, 13; 63:4; 64:14; 66:9; 73:20; 76:8.
PRCS says
“Should those books be banned?”
Far too many JW readers think book banning is a good thing. And doable.
Geez, I hate to break it to them…..
simpleton1 says
Those books need to be talked about, joked about, cartooned, sung about,, bill boarded, flyers, like:-
“islam is right about woman”
“islam is right about ,,,,, ” 🙂
“Mohammad guides to managing the wife”
“The go to, how to manage 4 wives”
Plus some notes of understanding the levels, the abrogation.
PRCS says
“Those books need to be talked about, joked about, cartooned, sung about,, bill boarded, flyers, like:-”
Precisely.
gravenimage says
Yes–We should be *reading* the Qur’an.
PRCS says
My first copy came from CAIR–years ago–per their ‘Explore the Qur’an’ campaign (now defunct?).
https://web.archive.org/web/20170802212551/https://www.explorethequran.com/cair.html
Page 174–despite what Muslims would like us to believe–makes quite clear the why, when, to whom, by whom, etc.that a thief’s hand can be amputated.
I don’t believe Uncle Nihad has ever been challenged to reject, renounce, denounce that wherever on the planet that is carried out.
Henry Mansfield says
Independent of religion here, the trend of too many on the Left tossing out the term ‘white supremacist’.
Check a website like HuffPo and you’ll see it applied to any white person that disagrees with a person of color.
Conservatives have noted this for years. The Trayvon Martin case in Florida was assumed to be a case of a white supremacist hunting down a black teen That was laughed out of court and the Hispanic with the surname Zimmerman has launched a lawsuit for the lies and character assassination attempted by many in the media.
Ray Jarman says
Henry, The HuffPo really means if you disagree with them, you are a bigot, racist, i.e., white supremacist.
PRCS says
Good explanation, and likely true.
Wellington says
The Great Pretend Game (GPG) continues, i.e., that Islam is fine and the only problem is that a few extremists here and there have hijacked it—and that every other major faith has this same problem.
No, it’s not fine and no other major religion is a bane to mankind as Mo’s creed is. Islam is malevolent and profoundly troubling in numerous ways that no other major faith remotely is. And the more devout the Muslim the more likely that person will either themselves engage in the terror demanded by Islam, so sick is this religion, or will at least support such terror. Over 36,000 documented Islamic terrorist attack worldwide just since 9/11 partially testifies to what a menace to mankind Islam truly is. What other major religion has anything near to this amount of documented terrorist attacks over the same time period done in the name of the religion? It is a miniscule amount if any amount at all.
As for the “alt-right” and “white supremacist” threat, it is spread out over only a dozen or so countries with, at most, several hundred thousands of such losers. By contrast, the radicalized portion of the Islamic world, very conservatively speaking, adds up to some 250 million people (personally I think it a lot more than this) spread out over 56 Muslim-majority nations and millions of Muslims in non-Muslim majority polities. Moreover, the so-called moderate Muslims do virtually nothing to dissuade their more devout fellow Mohammedans, indeed their chief concern seems to be wrapped up with self-pity and whining, while huge numbers of white people unequivocally, unambiguously have condemned the Far Right fruitcakes of their own race. Also, many Muslim terrorists are quite well funded. How many Far Right nuts are well funded?
The nonsense continues because of the refusal to do one essential thing: Characterize Islam as evil. Were this done, so much which would be sound and effective would start to fall into place relatively quickly. Sadly, not there yet. How dumb.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“The nonsense continues because of the refusal to do one essential thing: Characterize Islam as evil.”
100% spot on…
After Pres. Trump wins his second term, he’ll be “bulletproof.”
Maybe then he can take on islam in the United States “head-on”.
Wellington says
Sure hope so, James. Sure hope so since the time must come when one Western leader after another (already there with several Eastern European leaders) accurately describes Islam as inimical to Western concepts of liberty, equality under the law, women’s rights, a true Golden Rule for all, etc.
Actually, some 18 years after 9/11 this should have occurred by now extensively in the West. The fact that it hasn’t speaks volumes respecting how Islam continues to hide behind its religious veil.
I expect a total doofus like Obama not to get this (or actually be deceptive about it), but for Bush 43 not to own up by now to his rank ignorance in previously describing Islam as a religion of peace and tolerance is what really rankles me. I don’t know about you, but I am done with the Bushes forever.
gravenimage says
Right you are, Wellington.
mortimer says
RECENT HATE ATTACKS FROM ISLAM …
2020.03.09 (Afghanistan) A child is disassembled by a terrorist bomb blast.
2020.03.08 (Niger) Boko Haram kill eight hospitalized soldiers.
2020.03.06 (Afghanistan) A teacher is among seven civilians murdered by the Taliban.
2020.03.06 (Tunisia) Two suicide bombers go off outside the US embassy, killing a guard.
2020.03.06 (Afghanistan) Islamic State members open fire on a memorial for a Shia leader, slaughtering at least thirty-two.
2020.03.04 (Iraq) Two fishermen are murdered by the Islamic State.
mortimer says
THE WHITEST SUPREMACIST IS MOHAMMED …
mortimer says
FACT FOR THE ISLAMIC WOMEN’S COUNCIL …
On This Day… Mar 11, 2002: Mecca, Saudi Arabia
Schoolgirls are not allowed to escape a fire because they were not “properly covered”: 15 Killed
Peter35 says
Utterly sick, but hey, that’s islam, the ‘religion of peace’.
tim gallagher says
The usual lying Muslim BS and attempt to portray themselves as the victims, despite all the terrorist attacks by Muslims that endlessly occur. They’d love to get attention to be diverted on to the people who are awake to islam and are wanting to fight against its evil. I believe that islam has always been a vicious, murderous ideology and its basic texts are full of evil and calls for Muslims to get out there and murder non-Muslims. So, here is this Muslim woman telling this monster lie, and saying the authorities should look into the opponents of Islam “so that the community (ie the Muslims) did not feel isolated (I think Muslims always want to isolate from the infidels that they hate so much, look at the no-go zones in Europe) and disenfranchised and individuals weren’t tempted into extremism”. Total bullshit, of course. No doubt that New Zealand village idiot, Prime Minister Ardern, will buy this crap from her beloved Muslims. She seems to be such a gullible fool.
PRCS says
““so that the community (ie the Muslims) did not feel isolated (I think Muslims always want to isolate from the infidels that they hate so much, look at the no-go zones in Europe)”
tim gallagher says
Thanks for that, PRCS. I agreed with pretty well every word she (I think that was Ann Waters, wasn’t it?) said in the video. It sickens me this protection racket that is being run for disgusting, 100% incompatible Islam in our western countries. When she said she wants the Muslims to be treated the same as everyone else, as opposed to being treated well while she is silenced and considered “toxic”, I disagreed, because I am not as generous as she is. I don’t want Muslims to be allowed into our countries at all and I wouldn’t be as kind as she is, I don’t want them to be treated the same as the rest of us at all. So she is a bit too nice to Muslims. Just keep them out I say. Otherwise, I agree with everything she says about the sad situation in many western countries.
PRCS says
Yes, Anne Marie Waters. Here’s her Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaG8U7i1YDIQQDftxiMCyYw
She’s referring to any and all Muslims in the UK, current and future re: their deceitful claim:to NOT want to be treated in a manner which differs from others is, of course, the polar opposite of the special treatment their theocracy tells them they must demand.
Re: NZ PM.
Yes. A true, and truly clueless Social Justice Warrior.
tim gallagher says
PRCS, I had seen Anne Marie Waters speaking a while back and I was impressed with her. It takes courage to go against the pathetically soft, PC type of surrender to islam and to be considered, as she says, “toxic”. She is a gutsy person. Mostly I just stick with Jihad Watch these days, so I don’t hear people like Waters, David Wood, Nonie Darwish, et al, these days. I got what she was saying in the video about how Muslims are treated like some protected bunch of people in the UK and that she, therefore, would like them to be treated like everyone else is. I’m sure, like me, she’d love to let no Muslims into the UK, but it can’t be done. Only hindsight gives us that 20/20 vision. I notice how Muslims treat non-Muslims like crap in countries that they run and I guess that’s why I would like to see Muslims in our countries treated worse than the average members of society, not treated the same as the rest of us. Muslims never stop whingeing about their treatment anyway. I do wish we had woken up years ago and stopped letting so many Muslims in. I think Ardern is hopeless. There is talk here in Australia that she may be thrown out in the next New Zealand election. Apparently, the globalist mob think she is wonderful, but she has achieved bugger all in terms of running New Zealand well (the economy, etc). The point you make about how Muslims are bound to think they should be treated as “the best of people” is spot on. The worst of people think they are the best. They are so delusional.
OTTER says
The most fundamental and invariable tactic of Muslims is to lie, accuse, exaggerate and pretend they are the victims so that you get busy defending yourself and they continue their all-out and interminable war. We cannot fall for this. They have to be ‘attacked’ with facts.
But the sad truth is that with the world so full of leftists, nobody will listen
Gork says
New Zealand could become an interesting case study of exactly how disarming the public and importing foreign hatreds can infest a reasonably peaceful and prosperous society.
gravenimage says
NZ: Islamic Women’s Council calls on security forces worldwide to focus on “alt-right” and “white supremacists”
………………
In other words, ignore all of those Jihad terror attacks, you filthy Infidels.
b.a. freeman says
” …system to report hate speech and crime and for that system to be linked to security agencies’ databases.”
—
yeah, *that* won’t be abused. how about a clear and succinct legal definition of “hate speech?” of course, since the left is running things down there, why would they bother? if it’s a non-muslim saying things about the ummah – even if (*ESPECIALLY* if) true – then the kuffar needs to be arrested and put into prison along with pious muslims, so that they can show him the error of his ways.
i’ll bet that NZ will soon have the most “robust” (meaning effective at silencing speech) hate speech laws on the planet. sieg heil! the nazis and the ummah have won!
Wilfred Quadros says
These moron hypocrites are really concerned for a one-off shooting that happened in NZ. However not a word of solidarity for hundreds of Sri Lankans that lost their lives because of the maniacs. I hope more concerned citizens should play an active role in checking the activities of every muslim immigrant especially the Mullahs if they want to keep their community safe. It is better to be called an islamophobe than be dead. Just like cancer that can cured in it’s early stages, a similar approach is needed to check these blood thirsty vampires.
Battle says
What do the Christian women council about Islamic Supremacist Women’s Council?
Lydia Church says
At the end of the day…. no matter what, WE are the target.
I said this before, but they have a ‘terror watch list’ HERE in the US that lists all sorts of labels, and I meet most of them, and proudly so.
Some of them include things like being ‘anti-abortion’, believing in the end times prophesies, being a patriot, believing in the Constitution, etc. Go look it up, if it’s still accessible. If you’re a white, patriotic Christian (like me), you’re #1 on their hit list. By the way, it’s a government devised watch list. OUR government.
Patrick B. Ludwig says
Please. The “Christchurch Shootings” killed nobody. The incident is 100 percent fake news, a staged forgery for propaganda reasons.
Evidence? Just look at the video which can still be found on the internet.
Literally hundreds of shots fired with an automatic rifle. Indoors, outdoors. Audio supported.
BUT:
– No holes in the walls, ceilings and floors.
– No damage evident to the many cars parked in close proximity if the shootibg on the side of the road.
– No debris on the ground or the mosques carpeted floor, particularly no spent cartridges.
– No broken windows or splintered wood.
– No glass, no dirt, no bits of plaster from shots in the wall or ceiling – no chaotic mess.
– No bloodstains or gore on the floors or walls.
– No obvious wound on the casualties, no visible entry or exit wounds.
– No body movement or twitching caused by bullet impact detectable, despite repeated shots against “corpses”.
– No screams, no wounded moving around, just neatly falling and stacked up bodies.
– Little gunsmoke.
The video is so badly staged that they had to take it down ftom most sites – lest the scam were detected sooner. But it can still be found.
Pure BS.
Peter35 says
I. asked on an earlier site and got no answer, so here we go again:
Is NZ therefore about to imprison an innocent man who shot no one?
Were the funerals all fake and only bags of rocks buried?
Where are the people who were ‘shot?’
I could go on, but if you (or someone) would just answer these reasonable questions…please?
gravenimage says
Good questions, Peter.
gravenimage says
No, this is just conspiracy theory lunacy. Attacks by Infidels on Muslims are *extremely* rare, but the Mosque shootings in New Zealand did actually happen.
Peter35 says
Thanks G.I., I just don’t see how this one could NOT have happened, to say it was all a fake just leaves a myriad of unanswerable questions.
mark westbrock says
if they find any white supremacist /far right nazi’s, someone give me a shout and i shall pile on with them., in the meantime get ISLAM out of the west.
Vyx says
It seems to me that all the world governments want their nations filled with low IQ, angry Muslims. Why? Well, they can harass and commit violence against the normal citizens, who will then call for more security, bringing on the police state the governments want. Eventually, through rape and marriage, the current populace will be replaced by interracial children with lower IQs, and the children of Muslims, with even lower IQs. As for the Christians and alt right, all free thinkers must be silenced and intimidated.
OLD GUY says
One only needs to remember that Islamic men think they are superior to all other men, and they don’t even consider women worth anything accept sex objects. The islamics will always demand that the rest of us serve them and there needs, that is taught in their mosques.
The media has bought into their ideology or should I say the Saudi money has bought the media. Oil money is what gave rise to the muslim dream of an islamic world rule, before that they where camel drivers living in mud houses and tents. The world bows to the islamic dollars that have bought into the world stock markets and now have economic leverage in most countries. Sadly they will continue to bush for world rule until the rest of us non-islamic people standup and knock them down.
janwog says
Do we see the pro-Islamic goose the PM of New Zealand.
Rowena Haldane says
On a pessimistic note, unless we get a wakeup call, NZ will continue to fall for this massive global deception. At the rate we are going here in NZ by the time the blinkers come off it will be too late. Ardern wasnt elected into office. She got in because Winston Peters made it possible. Now we are living with the ongoing circus playing out in daily in the media. When reality hits home and the lights come on we wont be able to backtrack. We will live with the result of this deception that wilfully blind men and women in Govt. have allowed to proceed unabated.