“A teacher in Sweden has expressed strongly-worded opposition to a mooted ban on religious headscarves in schools, saying that those opposed to the garment have no place in the country at all.”
A strange and shocking comment coming out of “welcoming Sweden,” but it should be no surprise. The audacity of this teacher, Naoel Aissaoui, has been encouraged by Swedish authorities as the country has descended into migrant chaos. A popular mall in Stockholm has become a no go zone, where women are now afraid to go out in the streets at after dark.
Naouel Aissaoui, who is employed as a teacher in the municipality and follows the Muslim faith, said she will defy any ban on the Islamic headscarf, also known as the hijab, which she wears.
The statements of this entitled Islamic supremacist, however, are being resisted by “centre-right Moderate Party member Loubna Stensåker Göransson, who is supportive of a ban on the hijab in local schools, and said she associates the veil with the oppression of women and religious indoctrination.” Göransson, who is a Muslim herself, is being attacked, since she is not on board with Aissaoui, and is expected to be.
“It feels very strange, in fact, that she is an immigrant, a Muslim, a woman. She should have more understanding for us, and respect,” Aissaoui said.
On the contrary. Those who know about the oppression of women in Islamic countries should be the loudest opponents of the Sharia-mandated subjugation of women. They know the experience of being forced to wear such coverings, as mandated by the Sharia. It is a symbol of their inferiority. Instead, women such as Aissaoui seek to impose the Sharia upon the West. They have found success in Sweden, and have been emboldened.
“Sweden Teacher: Those Opposed to Islamic Headscarf Should Leave The Country,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, March 3, 2020:
A teacher in Sweden has expressed strongly-worded opposition to a mooted ban on religious headscarves in schools, saying that those opposed to the garment have no place in the country at all.
Naouel Aissaoui, who is employed as a teacher in the municipality and follows the Muslim faith, said she will defy any ban on the Islamic headscarf, also known as the hijab, which she wears.
Aissaoui engaged in a conversation with centre-right Moderate Party member Loubna Stensåker Göransson, who is supportive of a ban on the hijab in local schools, and said she associates the veil with the oppression of women and religious indoctrination.
“You cannot come to a country that is secular and equal and live with medieval values,” Ms Göransson said, reports Nyheter Idag.
“I feel confident and strong with my faith that says that there is God who is greater than Skurup municipality and this decision,” Aissaoui said and expressed confusion over Göransson’s stance, given the fact that Göransson is also from an immigrant background and is a fellow Muslim.
“It feels very strange, in fact, that she is an immigrant, a Muslim, a woman. She should have more understanding for us, and respect,” Aissaoui said.
“Move away, if it annoys you. Move from Skurup or from Sweden. This is my country, too,” she added.
Aissaoui’s statement comes just months after a report claimed that an area in the Swedish city of Borås has seen a process of Islamisation in recent years following a high number of Somalian migrants coming to the area….
Joe Scott says
No … Anything, or everyone to do with Islamic EVERYTHING, should be booted out of every single country that has been tainted by the satan seed of backward islam …
Lydia Church says
That teacher has no place in the country at all, and she needs to leave Sweden!
OLD GUY says
God don’t let her come to America we already have enough NUTS.
mortimer says
Swedes are now being ordered to leave their country by a Muslim invader who refuses to assimilate.
However, the Swedes REFUSE TO LEARN about the true purpose of the veil … IT IS NOT RELIGIOUS.
The Islamic veil is actually about the FINANCIAL VALUE OF A WOMAN to her CLAN, rather than a matter of piety. The veil keeps a woman invisible so that her FIRST COUSIN may have the RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL, in order to keep MONEY IN THE FAMILY.
EXOGAMY means that money LEAVES the FAMILY or the CLAN.
The Koran (K33.59) claims that the veil is about protecting MUSLIM WOMEN (NOT KAFIRS) from being raped by Muslim males who have the permission of Allah to do so. Islam is the only religion that encourages rape as a form of religious persecution.
There is no punishment in Sharia for a Muslim male who rapes a kafir.
Tony Naim says
100% correct.
Islam is the epitome of tribalism as it was metamorphosed by a military leader called Muhammad to divert aggression among Arab tribes towards non Arabs.
Tribalism glorifies violence to protect the clan, so does Islam in its terrorist jihadic ideology against non Muslims.
David says
Good observation!
King says
Q33.59 is different from what you quote. Islam or Quran has never been the problem, it is those who tried as much as possible to ensure their ideology supersede other ideas. Until we all believe we are one and live within our diversity in peace, hatred will continue to be spread
Marshall Gill says
Why not use your real name, Ali? The animal worshipers of the illiterate pedophile ARE the problem. Clearly, you are one of them pretending, until the moment when you slip the knife in the back.
gravenimage says
Here’s Qur’an 33:59:
O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
…………………
This does indeed threaten non-veiled women with molestation–that is, rape.
How is this *not* a problem? Further, the Qur’an teaches wife beating, rape, slavery and sex slavery, and the mass slaughter of Infidels. How is this not a problem?
As for Islam superseding other ideas being the problem, Islam itself–including in the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira–teaches that unbelievers must be made to submit to Islam, through violence if needed.
King may believe that Islam is intrinsically peaceful, but pious Muslims–and anyone who has read the texts of Islam–knows otherwise.
David says
Muslim women are taught from an early age that they are inferior to men, in many aspects: mentally, physically, financially. “Who are they to disagree?”(Eurythmics)
mortimer says
Key quote: “I feel confident and strong with my faith that says that there is God who is greater than Skurup municipality and this decision,” Aissaoui said.
That quote sums up the view of a misogynistic Islamic supremacist. ALLAH IS GREATER than all ideologies.
She has claimed Sweden for Sharia law. I would like to know which terrorist groups this woman endorses and which terrorist groups she communicates with.
Christian Indeed says
Just remind me never to go to Sweden, such a shame.
CogitoErgoSum says
Her faith tells her nothing about God since the god she worships is not God.
somehistory says
+100
Stieve says
Remember- they are migrants or refugees. They want a better life, get away from all the terrible things in their home countries. So we are told.
But in the new country they live their lives with all the old customs etc, refusintlg to integrate. Basically living in the same conditions they left, bringing barbarism to a host country.
Then the invaders tell people who are proud to live in a country that is not barbaric (the natives) to go pound sand when the invaders are told that they should try and adopt their new country’s cystoms.
And then the host country folds and let’s the invaders do as they wish.
And so another country is subsumed into islam, to become brutal and savage.
Then the cycle repeats.
(This trick only works one way, though. It would not work if a million Christians invaded Saudi Arabia. You will not civilize that place with millions of bible thumpers. You would only have a millions of dead Christians, and an outraged global media.)
PRCS says
Per Qur’an 33:59, it’s NOT about the oppression of Muslim women, rather their elevation above kuffar women.
O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.
As women at that time were being ‘abused’ during nighttime trips to the latrine, Muhammad received another timely ‘revelation’, which distinguished Muslim women from ‘filthy unbelieving women’ so that Muslim men would not hassle them.
The flip side: kuffar women remained fair game.
Clever, eh?
Revert, or else.
PRCS says
Qur’an 24:31–the so called ‘modesty’ verse permits a Muslim woman’s slaves and eunuchs to view her ‘uncovered’.
And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment.
PRCS says
No, neither of those verses speaks to the oppression of Muslim women.
And as neither has been abrogated, assertions that Muslim ‘scholars’ have prohibited or disavowed slavery is pure B.S.
Jayell says
Strange how Mohammed kept getting these ‘timely revlations’ that just happened to coincide with current circumstances and Mohammed’s own thinking. Rather like Allah’s learning curve, which often seems to miŕror Mohammed’s even though Allah is supposed to have been around through all eternity. Clearly a slow learner!
PRCS says
+1
Clive Delmonte says
This woman is confused about who the immigrants are in Sweden. She has apparently done a runner from her country of birth and now thinks it is the turn of the Swedes to do runners from their country of birth !! Do think the Swedes will ever wake up ?
Sun says
Last month, the Hamburg Higher Administrative Court lifted the ban on full concealment against a Muslim student: “There is no regulation in the ‘Hamburg School Act’ on which a full concealment ban can be based.
Sun says
Hamburg in Germany.
Just Venting says
I could think of lots of reasons to leave Sweden, and I do know a few that have. It looks to me like there are several more good reasons to leave.
But, if the real swedes that know how to maintain the infrastructure, drive in, and shovel snow leave, what will these newcomers do? Build igloos? Oh, sorry that is cultural appropriation. Yurts? Oops again. They could try goat skins for tents, they are hardy. But camels? Who knows.
gravenimage says
I don’t think that patriotic Swedes should cede their civilized nation to supremacist Muslims.
Jayell says
Building igloos would requure more in the way of rudimentary but imaginative engineering skills than simply draping skins/materials over sticks for a ‘tent’. And wouldn’g there be big problems with the daylight fasting during the summer moonths? I don’t think our Frnds of the Prophet would last very long anywhere near the arctic circle.
gravenimage says
Jayell, any Muslims within a certain range of the arctic circle (I think the rule is less than six hours of darkness) are allowed to switch to Mecca time for their fasts.
European pagan says
They behave like that because swedish people allow it. Muslims. Leave the planet. Now. ?↗️??
Met says
İ assumed that Sweden has human rights but as I see fascism is growing in Sweden. What a shame.
spiro says
So it looks like the invaders run the country at least who lives in Sweden
When will Sweden be turned over to Islam since they don’t seem to have the will to resist
Ren says
Sweden is becoming a dhimmi state.
gravenimage says
Sweden: Muslim teacher declares that those who oppose Islamic headscarf should leave the country
……………………
Naoel Aissaoui is not a “Swedish teacher”–she is Muslim, and her name comes from the Mahgreb.
misterb says
And is the word of this one teacher worth more than a million citizens?
It would be easier for one teacher to leave than a million.
somehistory says
If she refuses to abide by the law and leave her scarf tied to her camel when going to work, she should be fired and told to go back to whatever moslim place she left. It isn’t “her country.” And what is more, she is not “confused.” She’s arrogant, lawless, and creepy. She shouldn’t be “teaching” kids.
gravenimage says
Agreed. I wonder if she is teaching Mohammedans, or if she has made her way onto the staff of a Swedish school.
John says
I always find it interesting that Muslims demand that others should “respect” their views when they they do not respect any other point of view but their own.
samdav7 says
I thought the current Swedish government is mostly Swedish women but it looks like they’re dumb women. Keep importing evil cancer cells to your beautiful country and it is 100 percent guaranteed that Sweden is going to be the 1st European country to collapse and taken over by evil muslims !
gravenimage says
No, the Prime Minister is male, as are many other high-ranking government officials.
jca reid says
Idiot! It’s the wedge being shoved a little bit further under the door. These twats are handing their country & People over to a degenerate, Desert Nazi Ideology. They want your males killed & your women enslaved! Simple Facts. It’s in their most sacred Texts. That’s what they believe & want. Don’t apply normal European or even Human Decent Values in dealing with this rabid, feral scum.
Wayne Roberts says
The Swedish government, in concert with angela merkel of Germany, bear responsibility for aiding and abetting the spread, in the west, of the cancer that is islam. They should, in their respective countries, be charged with treason.
Goofy says
Wonderful that the teacher brought up the head scarf as a criterion for staying in Sweden. Now we can safely propose that only women who give up their head scarfs may stay. What about that? If she had not brought up the issue it would have been Islamophobic to do it. She is a perfect specimen of Muslim women: Intolerant and dimwitted with half the intellectual capacity of a man. Maybe Mohammed got that one right after all?