This may not be true. But something must explain the total collapse of British law enforcement and intelligence in the face of rampant nationwide Muslim rape gang activity. Is it all simply because authorities were afraid of charges of “Islamophobia”? Maybe. Shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain has shown itself to be particularly susceptible to such manipulation. But there could easily be something even more sinister behind it. And this could be it. In any case, the information in this story about how police were ordered to stand down regarding Muslim rape gang activity should be damning enough to lead to a wholesale housecleaning of the British political class, but for that Britain would have to be a sane society, and of course it is not.
“BROWN PAPER ENVELOPE: Ex-PM Gordon Brown ‘Let RAPE GANGS Roam Free In Return For Saudi OIL MONEY,’” by Jordan James, Politicalite, March 14, 2020:
FORMER Labour boss Gordon Brown allegedly let Muslim rape gangs roam free in Britain in an alleged deal with the Saudis, Politicalite can exclusively reveal.
A City of London finance source exclusively claimed to Politicalite that during Gordon Brown’s short tenure as Prime Minister he borrowed money from the Saudi’s – but the deal had BIG strings attached.
He urged the dollar-rich Gulf states to prop up ailing national economies through a massive injection of capital into the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and also asked for cash for Britain.
In return, he allegedly had to let Muslims “do anything they like.”
A source connected finance in The City told Politicalite that “In return for the money, the condition they insisted on, was that Muslims in Britain must be free to do anything they like.”
Politicalite reported in 2018 that ex-North West Chief prosecutor alleged that the Home Office ordered police to ignore grooming gang claims in 2008 – though Home Secretary Jacqui Smith had nothing to do with the order.
Nazir Afzal who reversed a Crown Prosecution Service decision and successfully prosecuted the notorious Rochdale rape gang told the BBC in 2018 that in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular email to all police forces calling on them to not investigate the sexual exploitation of young girls in towns and cities across the UK.
He said: “You may not know this, but back in 2008 the Home office sent a circular to all police forces in the country saying ‘as far as these young girls who are being exploited in towns and cities, we believe they have made an informed choice about their sexual behaviour and therefore it is not for you police officers to get involved in.’”
“This brings a whole new dimension to the case – it was thought that both local police and local councils had failed their duty of care, but if true, Mr Afzal’s claims would show that instructions to the police to ignore the claims came from the very top, at the heart of government in Whitehall.”…
RichardL says
I think that must be false information because it smacks of a conspiracy: all chief constables kept quiet about this order? Even the conservative ones? The CCs are not required to follow orders from the Home Office or the PM.
Martin says
Of course this information is false. Jihad Watch is an important, respected, internet site and they’ll soon lose that respect if they continue to publish garbage like this. I hope that they stop it. We need sites like Jihad Watch and it would be a shame if they can no longer be trusted with reporting the truth.
I don’t want Jihad Watch, an anti-Islamist site, to turn into the laughing stock that 5Pillars, a pro-Islamist site, is:
https://5pillarsuk.com
James Lincoln says
Martin,
Robert Spencer clearly states that “this may not be true.”
He just raises the question – and always errs on the side of caution…
gravenimage says
Exactly, James.
Martin says
That’s like me saying, “This may not be true but some say that James Lincoln is a child molester.”
See what I mean?
gravenimage says
Martin, this would only be the case if it was Robert Spencer himself accusing Gordon Brown of this out of the blue–but it is not.
Maureen says
Bur it IS 100% TRUE!
Maureen says
Are you kidding me? This is true.A circular from the HO ORDERED the local police to IGNORE Muslim grooming gangs. An x police officer I know has a COPY of the circular!
RichardL says
Hi Maureen, can you get that copy to Jihad Watch? That would be a coup for our common cause.
Trish says
Well it’s quite obvious that the British police QUIT enforcing BRITISH law a long time ago. On that, we can all agree.
pragmatist says
This has been common knowledge – the HO order that is, I don’t know about the Saudi influence issue – I remember seeing a copy of the order on, I think, a YT video.
Norman Gardner says
The allegation is there but we do not have an explanation as why the police did allow the exploitation of these young girls. Where the senior officers compromised by the government or the media. This does need further investigation since it went on for several years and police did turn their backs on the families and the girls.
pragmatist says
It is not garbage, it has been common knowledge for ages – the HO e-mail was exposed by the Chief Prosecutor, and I seem to remember a copy being shown on a YT video. The ramifications are still continuing today – why do you think they keep on arresting Tommy Robinson? It’s because he is helping to keep it from dying down. The Saudi involvement issue I cannot comment on.
Rob says
Brown and Blair should be tried for their crimes. The only upside if one can call it that is that the victims were the daughters of Labour supporters. This in my view led to the Tory resurgence in the North at the recent election. The North finally ‘got it’.
gravenimage says
Unlike you, I don’t want to see *anyone* fall victim to the horrors of Jihad rape–I don’t care what the politics of their parents may be.
mortimer says
Not necessarily a ‘conspiracy theory’. The British have had an unholy alliance with oil-bearing Arabs since the British navy converted from coal to bunker oil and diesel fuel stimulated by First
Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill and Admiral Sir John (Jacky) Fisher.
Finding and securing sources of oil proved to be the most difficult part of the venture. Churchill wrote: “The oil supplies of the world were in the hands of vast oil trusts under foreign control.”
The British government must continuously humiliate itself to keep the oil flowing from the Arabs.
I believe the cover-up of Muslim crime is at the top and most of it may be a tacit understanding that is never enunciated, but understood by those in charge. It is a sickness that means never criticizing oil-bearing Arabs or their religion.
I also suspect (applying Ockham’s Razor) that the most likely explanation of the local cover-ups is that some local politicians were involved in the rape gangs or even a rogue police commander who was able to prevent himself from being investigated.
If UK were to find a new portable fuel for its military and civilian needs, I think subservience to Islam … this de facto Dhimmitude … would soon be a thing of the past.
Maureen says
We are demanding the HO conduct an investigation into Muslin rape gangs,why it happened and WHO was involved.Heads will roll,trust me !
pragmatist says
They won’t unfortunately, had they been going to it would have happened long ago.
Maureen says
The ones who spoke out against it were threatened or sacked!
carpediadem says
And one who helped cover it up fled to Australia:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-32478867
Now she is here:
https://au.linkedin.com/in/sonia-sharp-157903101
carpediadem says
Also this:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/senior-bureaucrat-sonia-sharp-to-leave-after-public-sector-commissioner-review-20150423-1mrerl.html
Ferd III says
Did you bother to read the article?
It quotes a source from the government itself – a Moslem no less.
If you have other ‘proof’, other than wetting the panties about your Moslem friends, please provide.
jayell says
1. The clearly trumped-up actions legal against, or official silencing of, whistle-blowers who originally raised public awareness of the grooming gangs and the connection with islam (e.g., Nick Griffin and Anne Cryer, MP for Keighley, to name but two);
2. The blatantly obvious national down-playing of publicity in the MSM relating to the muslim grooming gang cases and related matters, and the level of comprehensive official corruption in the towns where these gangs operated;
3. The clearly orchestrated pro-muslim propaganda in the BBC and MSM from the time of the public outing of the grooming gang, transparently contrived and unnecessary, and obviously intended to counter the effect of the publication of grooming gang and other undesirable and criminal muslim activities activities;
4. The continuing failure of the UK establishment to state the connection between the grooming gangs and islam, using the term ‘Asian’ to describe them instead;
5. The clearly-orchestrated over-exposure in the MSM (and BBC) of sex-abuse cases involving indigenous culprits. despite the fact that these are proportionally less numerous than islam-related
ones;
6. The clearly-officially-orchestrated, and now-infamous. ‘Celebrity Sex Scandal’ campaigns, deliberately promoted to coincide with the arrival and attendant publicity of the grooming gang cases in the courts, very obviously intended to act as a smoke screen to deflect attention from, and whitewash, the muslim grooming gangs;
7. The frankly ‘grovelling’ pro-isam attitude evident in Home Office policy as evidenced in the appallingly negligent and outrageously immoral failure to assist Ashia Bibi (the Pakistini Christian victim of islamic opprerssion) on the pretext that it “might upset certain communties” (these ‘communities’ deliberately not named);
8. The facts that (a) action against the muslim grooming gangs was publicised as taken by Nazir Afzal (a muslim) and NOT by an indigenous non-muslim official and (b) the decision to strip a Shamima Begum (the notorious IS bride) of her British nationality was heavily publicised as being taken by a previous muslim Home Sectretary, demonstrate a clear intention to promote muslims as embodying ‘British’ values (which they then proceed to deny as and when it suits them!) and to confirm the official UK Establishment line of unconditional appeasement towards islam and its followers and not to ‘upset them’ at any costs; and finally
9. The elevation of the self-styled ‘Musilm Council of Great Britain’ to some sort of quasi-Governmental advisory status on official policy, even though (a) it does not have a properly democratic structure, (b) it has no mandate from the general British electorate (and certainly does NOT represent their views), and (c) it currently represents the views and values of only 5% of the UK population.
There are no doubt other factors that could be mentioned.
In a phrase, the islam-infested UK Establishment is bent as a nine-pound note.
jayell says
Sorry, the first part of this post seems to missing. The items 1-9 relate to the observable behaviour of the UK establishment, and show that although although Gordon Brown may not be entirely to blame for any gross negligence apropos the muslim grooming gangs, the general behaviour of the establishment and its culpable pro-islam stance (as exemplified by the Home Office circular of 2008 which clearly seeks to promote gross police negligence) certainly is.
Jaydam says
Well said, Jayell.
And it just shows what a total corrupt political elite existed, and still exists in U.K politics today.
pragmatist says
There was also the injunction to press outlets to search for evidence and publicise offences by other ethnic groups.
James Lincoln says
jayell,
Excellent post, I think that you hit on just about everything…
jca reid says
BASTARD!! This could mean that the entire Labour Government Cabinet knew about this! Certainly his Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith(?), of the Time MUST have known as they were the top person re. domestic Affairs. Utterly disgraceful! Major Criminal & Civil Actions have to be brought against the politicians concerned.
Martin says
This story is as ridiculous as the one many Muslims and other Jew-haters believe about six Jews based in Zurich controlling the world. Don’t be as stupid as they are.
mortimer says
Martin, there were cover-ups and the Labour Party refused to defend working-class British girls from rape gangs. Why?
Martin says
“Martin, there were cover-ups and the Labour Party refused to defend working-class British girls from rape gangs. Why?”
That was pure cowardly “political correctness” (which I despise) towards Pakistani Muslims over the fears of civil unrest (street violence) that would come to pass if the truth ever came out. Heads need to roll over this colossus crime against underage, non-Muslim, British school girls by so-called “British”- Muslims and the government officials who protected them for decades.
mortimer says
Martin says: pure cowardly “political correctness”.
If that is so, how much political correctness is there in UK and what can be done to make the people understand that the IDEOLOGY of Islam is a danger to the British?
The British are convinced that Islam is somehow a ‘race’, whereas it is nothing but an THEORETICAL, INTELLECTUAL PRODUCT called ‘IDEOLOGY’.
Why will the British people not admit that Islam is a POLITICAL IDEOLOGY?
James Lincoln says
Correct, mortimer.
If islam were a race, a Caucasian could never convert to islam.
Yet the imams encourage this…
pragmatist says
Sorry, it is not ridiculous – there is too much confirmatory evidence.
w says
The Labour Government where first alerted in 2002 to the organised nature of Muslim grooming gangs by the Labour M.P Anne Cryer in the northern town of Keighley, It was from that moment that a orchestrated cover up of the truth by the authority’s began and a refusal to act by the police against the serious allegations being made regarding some of the Muslim populace of this town.
There is a absolute refusal to upset the apple cart in these Northern towns in the U.K and a blind eye is often turned, this is also the same with the supply of drugs and laundering of money by organised gangs of Muslims, everyone knows it goes on but the absolute refusal to deal with it by the authority’s is very evident.
There should have been criminal investigations against those in charge at the time for the dereliction of duty they have shown. Their inaction condemned many more young girls to the gross acts of abuse performed by these gangs since 2002.
Michael Copeland says
BORROW-MORE BROWN
Gordon Turn-a-Blind-Eye Borrow-More Brown
Skilfully drove the economy down.
Gordon Call-Her-Bigoted arrogant Brown
Couldn`t take a question without a frown.
Gordon Eat-the-Seedcorn Chancellor Brown
Sold all the gold: in debt we drown.
Gordon Move-The-Goalposts Brownshirt Brown
For boosting of your voter base, award yourself a crown..
Gordon Rub-Their-Noses-In-Diversity Brown
Has so enriched the culture of our local town.
Gordon Multi-Cultural Disaster-Maker Brown
Sucking up at Iftar you made yourself a clown.
What of immigration, then, Gruppenfuhrer Brown ?
“Open up the Floodgates! Let the Brits drown!”
Culture-Killing Class-Betraying Mega Bully Brown,
Look at how your handiwork has dragged us down.
Author’s footnote:
In many cases above “Brown” includes “Blair”
tom parry says
See the saga of Tommy Robinson, For just reporting this he lands in jail twice. All totol crazy, he just reports like Robert Spencer.
Wellington says
test
Wellington says
Still having a lot of trouble posting. Anything remotely long, an “ERROR” message comes up. Not sure this won’t be deleted. What is going on?
RichardL says
some of my stuff is posted and then disappears. Weird.
James Lincoln says
Wellington,
As I said in a previous post, I have had problems posting in the past.
Try using different Internet service providers, different public Wi-Fi signals, and your own smartphone as a hotspot.
And save any work on your clipboard/Word document.
And may be a techie at JW can help.
Hope you get it fixed soon, your posts are among the best at Jihad Watch.
Wellington says
Thanks, James.
gravenimage says
Sorry this is still a problem.
I still have to log in every time I post now. A minor thing, but annoying.
K John Rosier. says
If true we need another serious investigation into this scandal. We know that there was fear of Councils being accused of Islamophobia and that such a fear led to inaction in at least 6 cities in the UK. The police did take the view that these girls were not victoms and knew what they were doing. But it’s clear from parents who tried to protect their daughters from being approached by these men, even when they came to their doors to demand access to their daughters, which certainly happened in Huddersfield, that the police were not interested. A decision had been made by someone.
If it can be proved that this decision initially came from the heart of Government at the time, then someone must be legally held to account. The girls who were abused deserve it and so does the nation, who were very shocked by these revelations.
The only trouble is that the leftist Parties remained silent, to this day. And these men put on trial never admitted they had done anything wrong.
In fact we know that the leader of the Rotherham gang made it quite clear in court as part of his defence that according to his Religion and culture he had a perfect right to take girls for sex. It was a religious requirement. It’s even been said it was an act of worship.
So there you have it.
Islam is at its core a sex or fertility cult that can do as it pleases with non-believers and their children.
Now these historic allegations of collusion in 2008 have reached the Home Office and even No 10.
We do have a right to know. And if these allegations are shown to be true, justice against those in Office at the time must be enacted. J
Martin says
Informative post.
SAFI says
From what I’ve read on these cases it seems that leftists did not simply “remain silent” but at least in some cases they actively tried to silence or demonize those who tried to uncover the truth because as these cretinous “anti-fascist” douchebags always like to say “it would play into the hands of the far-right!”…
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Isn’t this the same Gordon Brown who went so easy on the Lockerbie mass murderers?
R Russell says
Gordon Brown was the UK prime minister. He was not part of the Scottish government.
It was the Scottish government, not the UK government who released Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, not the UK government, although I’m sure they would have discussed it with them.
Megrahi was tried and convicted under Scots law.
Megrahi was released in accordance with Scots law jurisprudence.
Wellington says
Blair, Brown, Cameron, May—all culpable even assuming this particular story about Brown is not true.
gravenimage says
+1
somehistory says
“as far as these young girls who are being exploited”…shows they knew the ***children*** were being taken unfair advantage of, and yet, excused it by saying the ***children*** made an “informed choice.”
In the U.S., children can’t make such “choices.” Is Britain so far behind the curve?
Sounds altogether plausible. Two sayings come to mind: Truth is stranger than fiction, and Every man has his price. He wouldn’t be the first to look the other way for a bit of cash.
There should a serious investigation and the girls and their parents should sue…if this is allowed under the law there.
Dawne Swift says
In the US, Jeffrey Epstein’s victims (all under 16) were considered to be making an informed choice. Most of the establishment must have known what he was up to. It was only after the knowledge became public that he was prosecuted.
James Lincoln says
Dawne Swift says,
“It was only after the knowledge became public that he was prosecuted.”
That is true.
The muslim rape gangs in the UK would have never been prosecuted, albeit MUCH too little too late, if not for the fact that their behavior became public knowledge.
somehistory says
U.S. laws…age range for the various states are not all the same…say that a “child” under the age of…cannot make an “informed choice.”
Laws are not always followed, but for a top government agency or person to say these girls gave “informed consent” is criminal.
je got away with a lot because top persons in government helped him keep his dirty business in crime going because they were a part of it.
No person…not even a hardened prostitute…would give consent to being raped by fifty or more dirty moslims, or give consent to being passed around like a joint of weed from one to another dirty filthy creeps.
If any of these “children” gave any kind of consent, they were not “informed” of the true nature of what was going to be done to them. And since drugs were used to make them “consent,” it never was “informed consent,” no matter how many je’s there are in the U.S.
Heads should have been rolling in the U.K. over this for years now.
George Baxter says
The story may seem fanciful but the reality is that have been long term and consistent suppression of stories and cover-ups. There must be a deep reason.
It is consistent with my suspicions about Gulf money. Vast amounts of sponsorship money is paid to sports fron Gulf based airlines. Other airlines around the world don’t have that much cash. Could be legit. Or maybe a cover for slush funds to persuade politions, media editors and others in positions of influence.
Eugene Donald Clough says
The story in the original post is weak. Where is the evidence? Where is the corroboration? Where are the anonymous leakers? I don’t believe it.
Ferd III says
Did you read it? Main source is a Moslem who was in Brown’s office.
Another Soros paid Troll defending Moslem supremacism and rape gangs?
Terence Oakes says
It’s a fact . Brown should be prosecuted
gravenimage says
UK: Former PM Gordon Brown accused of letting Muslim rape gangs roam free in exchange for Saudi oil money
……………………..
I doubt this was actually a quid pro quo–but that business dealings with the vile Saudis and other Muslims might have exacerbated the “political correctness” and willful denial already present in British society is quite possible–and utterly shameful.
Wellington says
Subtly valid, gravenimage.
mortimer says
THE ROT IS IN THE DAMN HOME OFFICE !!!
Quote: “…in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular email to all police forces calling on them to not investigate the sexual exploitation of young girls in towns and cities across the UK.”
Maureen says
100% CORRECT!
Aussie Infidel says
The rape of young local women by Muslim immigrants is an ongoing issue throughout the Western world; and is sanctioned by the Quran (Q4:3, 33:59, etc). This is what happens when naive politicians have been brainwashed to believe that all cultures are equal, and ignore the fact that many third world immigrants have vastly different values from our own. If our political leaders are unaware of this, they are not fit to hold office. If they are aware of it, or it comes to their attention and they ignore it, they are criminally negligent and should be jailed.
But the basic issue of Muslim immigration and its potential problems goes back a lot further than Gordon Brown, who was Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1997 to 2007 and PM from 2007 to 2010. Apparently, Brown is now serving on the advisory council of Partners Group, a Swiss equity firm. Whether Brown received kickbacks from the Saudis, I don’t know; but he certainly continued the policies of his predecessor Tony Blair who was worse in his immigration policies for “Asians and Africans” (UK-speak for Muslims). Reportedly, his motive was to “rub the right’s nose in diversity”. Only a loony Leftist could think like that.
But long before those two erstwhile old socialists opened Britain’s flood-gates to the Muslims, Conservative leader Ted Heath back in 1968 dismissed his fellow MP Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech about the problems of Asian immigration as “inflammatory and divisive”. Unfortunately, Powell used euphemisms like “Asians” for Indians and Pakistanis, many of whom were Muslims; and “blacks” for Africans, who were also mostly Muslims. He also commented, “In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man”, which didn’t endear him to the ‘progressives’. The British newspapers also denounced Powell’s speech as “an appeal to racial hatred”.
Nevertheless, many people agreed with Powell and there were street demonstrations supporting him, but he was abruptly sidelined by the political establishment and consigned to obscurity. Back then, Britain (and the US and Australia) were much more racist countries than they are now, but their leaders had already been cowered by political correctness. But worst of all, the real issue facing all our countries – the Islamic jihad – has never been debated seriously in parliament or anywhere else. That would indeed be too politically incorrect and Islamophobic.
And while it is true that many of those Asian and African immigrants have successfully integrated into British society, they are mostly from the minorities – Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and a handful of ex-Muslims. The Muslim population has remained largely a separate society within the UK, and is growing more numerous and militant every year – and it will continue to do so as long as the retrograde force of Islam is allowed to exist.
Britain – like every other western country – needs an open and in-depth inquiry into Islam, which hopefully would result in its being declared a criminal ideology and closed down.
James Lincoln says
Aussie Infidel,
An excellent and accurate summary. My compliments.
Dawne Swift says
I doubt that the motive for keeping silent about the grooming gangs was Saudi money – after all these gangs existed well before the period mentioned of the financial crash. Far more likely that Home Office instructions were issued to avoid inflaming “racist” tensions.
You can see from the way the Brexit vote was dealt with that there are 2 classes in the UK – the establishment/people who consider themselves to be “liberal” – and the rest. We could call “the rest” the “untermensch”. The first group pretty much despises the untermensch and consider them to be intrinsically racist/stupid. It’s no coincidence that the girls who were abused and in some cases murdered were from the untermensch.
White, working class girls – many of whom were in care or difficult family circumstances. The police line was that they were prostituting themselves to these men and they didn’t consider the girls (some as young as 11) worth their time investigating, plus they had orders not to do so, because it would have inflamed “racist tensions”.
Leaving aside the question of racism, it’s the same mentality that meant that Jeffrey Epstein got away with abusing 14 year old girls in full sight of his many friends from the establishment. These girls were also untermensch – disposable.
In the UK we need to keep pushing for the Home Office report into these grooming gangs to be made public. Contact your MP and Priti Patel (Home Secretary).
James Lincoln says
Dawne Swift,
Great analogy to the Jeffrey Epstein case…
Henry Mansfield says
As an American I’ve struggled to understand how this could happen, and definitely don’t want to see a replay here.
On a social media site years ago an American ex-pat in the UK was crowing about how wonderful the Socialist trends were there, and I pointed out the grooming gang problem I had been reading about as something we didn’t need if that was part of the trade-off. His response was that no such thing was possible in the UK, and that he had Muslim friends and didn’t want to see ‘accusations’ like that.
This was before the first prosecutions in Rotherham and before the Brexit vote. Now the blowhard is pretty much silent except for the occasional toxic remark. Giving him the benefit of the doubt that he honestly didn’t know of the grooming gangs, then the BBC and the British government must have been spiking these stories so they never came to light. No other explanation.
James Lincoln says
Rightly so, Henry.
There is no other believable explanation…
gravenimage says
Thanks for that disturbing account, Henry.
Henry Mansfield says
Last week I speculated a bit here, thinking that perhaps the gangs were bribing social workers and police at the local level. Many reports over the years revealed that the victims of these gangs would be transported to other towns in a form of sex trafficking, probably after a parent or more conscientious government employee learned of the abuse.
The fact that this went on for decades before successful prosecutions I ascribed to ‘head in the sand’ syndrome as much as political correctness or fear of being labelled racist.
Whether the rot went to the very top or not, the average British citizen needs to be aware and extremely vocal going forward for the ‘grooming’ activity to end. And if as someone above says the gangs got bold enough to come to a man’s door and demand he hand over his daughter, then sitting on his jury and vindicating him for what happened next would be sending a loud and clear message.
No Muzzies Here says
The politicians in Britain and the Democrats in the USA have entered into an agreement with the Muslim world. In return for their support in the elections, the politicians let it be known that they were going to allow Muslims to do whatever they wanted.
Like Barack Obama, they betrayed their countries in return for political power.
Owen Morgan says
Money doesn’t need to grease palms for British politicians, especially Labour and SNP ones, to serve the cause of islam. The Labour government, of which Gordon Brown was a prominent member, extended the availability of postal voting. That move was transparently intended to assist the corruption of elections in constituencies with muslim majorities, or large muslim minorities, because muslims were assumed to vote Labour, although they have transferred their allegiance to the SNP, now, in Scotland. With postal voting, it’s amazing how a minority can transform into a majority.
In no time, there were instances of thirty-odd supposed voters registered from tiny premises, or very large families sharing remarkably similar handwriting. There is an Electoral Commission in the UK
, supposed to deal with voting abuses like those, but it is hopelessly “politically correct.”
OLG GUY says
Yes! follow the money is always a good way to find the truth. The Saudi oil-money is spread around the worlds politicians to acquire favors.
Giacomo Latta says
I wish it were true.Then the only thing needed to fix the situation is to have a prime minister say to all his flunkies that muslims can no longer do what they want and to pass it on. Instead what we have is an entire society afraid of being ”Islamophobic” instead of afraid of being tolerant of misogyny, anti-semitism, shame of one’s own culture, etc.