What are the chances that this young man will gratefully accept the aid that Europe offers him, and become a loyal, stable, productive citizen of a European state? I have often noted that many of the migrants come with a supremacist ideology that they mean to impose upon their new homes. This young man’s t-shirt is a clear indication of that. This is true whether or not he himself understands its significance. Someone made the shirt, and someone gave it to him.
“Alleged refugee children transported to Eurpa [sic] by political idiots wear T-shirts with inscriptions celebrating the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottomans in 1453,” Medforth Blog, April 19, 2020:
The rescued “refugee child” in the photo (right) is wearing a shirt with an inscription “Istanbul 1453” – the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottomans in 1453.
Who equipped these young men with such clothes? The victory of Islamic Ottomans against Christian Byzantium with force of arms.
owensgate says
Sorry, but the idiot Europeans should have let Greece throw ALL the Turks back across the Bosporus in 1821.
GreekEmpress says
+1000!
Lydia Church says
In that case, I will wear a shirt celebrating the Crusades that took it back!!!
Mark says
Well said sister and it time we had another Crusades to clean out this Islamic invasion.
Melvin Ruebinawitz says
The first step is to identify the problem: 1) Compliant, PC, Dhimimi, elected office holders. 2) vote them out. 3) Stop the dole If you don’t feed them they won’t come.
william carr says
Lydia
Your history is a bit spotty, the Crusades were between 1096 and 1271. The Knights of Europe held on to their conquests for two centuries but the Muslims/Saracens conquest of Constantinople came much later after the crusader kingdoms had fallen. The Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI Palaeologus appealed to Rome for aid and it was refused for several reasons; the politics make fascinating reading.. The crusaders did not always follow their creed. The Sack of Constantinople 1198 involved three days pillaging churches and killing much of the Greek Orthodox Christian population.While not unusual behaviour for the time, contemporaries such as Innocent III and Ali ibn al-Athir saw it as an atrocity against centuries of classical and Christian civilisation.
SAFI says
@owensgate Sorry I don’t get it. It would have been absolutely impossible for “Greece” to throw ALL the Turks back across the Bosporus in 1821 . In fact had it not been for direct european(Russo-Anglo-French) intervention the ottomans would have crushed the “Greek Revolution” (aka War of Independence.) (Not to mention the several thousand volunteers from all over Europe who travelled to Greece to fight alongside the rebels)
Perhaps what you meant is 1921(after the Ottomans were defeated in WW1) which is indeed a very different story. Indeed a hundred years ago the Greeks could have easily occupied(liberated) Constantinople pushing the Turks and their religion out of Europe after almost 600 years since the Ottomans first planted their moon crescent flag on european soil in the mid 1300s, if only Greece’s european “allies”(especially France) had not so staunchly opposed the idea. At the time Greece had already been awarded Adrianople(the pre-1453 Ottoman capital) at the end of the Great War and had more than enough military forces in Thrace to carry out such an operation without problems. In fact that is exactly what some of the Generals in the Greek Army wanted to do in 1922, while all of Attaturk’s army was still in Asia and couldn’t have done anything to stop them, but the plan was aborted due to the protests of Greece’s own european allies which made the Greeks fear that they could end up being blockaded by their fellow Christian allies had they gone ahead and raised the holy Cross over Hagia Sophia’s dome! And thus, a likely never to be repeated, golden opportunity to undo Mehmet II’s work and throw Islam out of eastern Europe fell victim to western Europe’s self-interested machiavelian politics which sought not to upset their centuries-old profitable commercial partnership with the Ottomans…
jim says
Interesting story about the Greeks. Tell me, who exactly constituted Europe’s international merchant class? Whose interests were at stake in ending a ‘commercial partnership’ with the Ottomans.
In answering that question, you might be interested to know that English merchant marine law is not common law, but rather Sephardic law. Odd, isn’t it?
gravenimage says
English merchant marine law is Sephardic law–what?
commonsense says
I believe the momser sporting the T- shirt celebrating the fall of Constantinople is doing so as a provocative act. I have personally observed other young Muslims wearing similar message-bearing attire – usually shirts – that are equally offensive, although often the message is oblique. For example, last June, on D-Day, no less, I was in a buffet restaurant where I noticed a twenty-ish Muslim, who was with his brothers, father, and hijabbed mother, wearing a T-shirt on which a large bomb (the black, spherical kind seen in cartoons) was depicted, its fuse lit and sparking. I asked the young thug what message he was trying to send , and if he was endorsing jihad. He reacted with intense hostility, and physically threatened me, prompting me to reach for my cell phone and call 911. He and his family then hastily exited the premises, while he hurled invectives at me on his way out. The police soon arrived, but were not especially sympathetic; I was advised that the Muslim punk had the right to wear the T-shirt (first amendment, and all) as long as he did not initiate any other overtly threatening behavior. Technically, I knew the police’s argument was correct, but I can only take so much. 9-11 was more than enough. These bastards parade around in clothes advertising their hatred and contempt for us, deriving great amusement from watching others’ reactions. Many are too obtuse to get the message (e.g. the meaning of the bomb), while nearly everyone else turns a blind eye, afraid to start trouble. And these Muslim gorillas watch, and snicker at our stupidity and cowardice.
jim says
Muslims, like other primitive people, respect strength. The wolf targets the sheep that is limping.
I don’t know why white people find this so hard to understand. Act like a weakling and you are painting a target on your back. Non-muslim black street thugs act the same way, targeting weaklings first.
It’s like white people gave up after 1950 and decided to raise generations of males who would be traumatized by watching Nature videos, let alone getting in a fight.
John Allan says
Bosporus? Bosphorus, to my knowledge. But close.
somehistory says
moslims feel “supreme” because of their listening to their imams, clerics, madrassa “teachers,” and other moslim “leaders,” telling them they are supreme from birth. Their filthy book assures them that they are superior to all others, that some others aren’t even human, and that they have every “right” to rape and murder those who disagree.
And, this “superior” mindset is also seen in many other “invaders” into America who carry the flags of their home country and insist that the U.S. belongs to them. It’s hard to feel any sympathy for “refugees” who want to take over and make one live by their rules…or else.
Trish says
You are correct, of course. But what’s really horrible is that our politicians are all for it.
RichardL says
And exactly 50% of these “children‘s” birthdays were June 1 2006 and only 4 were girls. They cost 6000 Euro/month on average and will bring 6 relatives who will also cost as much taxes as one average German tax payers pays. There will be war in the ME because of the oil price crash and there will be civil war in Europe because of the “refugees” and the mass unemployment. I hope the US doesn’t send a single soldier to either theatre.
elee says
Do you want to fight them “there” or “here”?
Savvy Kafir says
I agree that the U.S. should not send any soldiers to any Muslim-majority countries — unless it’s to temporarily seize coastal territory for dumping millions of Muslim deportees from the West. But it would be a mistake not to support the freedom-loving patriots of European countries, or of Canada and Australia, when desperation drives them to civil war or violent revolution.
We cannot allow any part of the West to be lost to Islam. It all must be reclaimed, and every last Muslim expelled. We need to support any Western patriots fighting for that goal — no matter how many of their fellow countrymen are on the wrong side of this conflict.
RichardL says
The “freedom loving patriots” in Germany for instance have voted in an 87% majority who want to import millions and millions. If you want to defend them, go right ahead, but don’t ask other people to fight for people who will repay you by despising you (I have been a soldier for over 30 years). Why do you think majorities in France, Germany and so on look down on the States? Because they cannot bear to be forever indebted to them for ridding them from the Nazis.
James Lincoln says
RichardL,
Western Europe will be on their own this time around…
jim says
The great irony is that in 20 years, Hitler will undergo a surge in popularity. Muslims love him already, but the indigenous population of European countries will start to wonder why their own leaders were globalist open borders types instead of nationalists.
Once they find out the Jewish role in fostering mass immigration in places like Sweden, the USA, Australia, Germany (etc), it won’t take much for a lot of the remaining indigenous to start to become friends with Muslims over that issue.
gravenimage says
Jim, why do you think the Islam-loving Hitler will be popular with Infidels?
The claim that Jews–who are only a tiny percentage of Europe’s population and who do not set any European nation’s immigration policy–are somehow responsible for Muslim immigration makes no sense at all.
The idea that native Europeans will ally with Muslims in violently targeting Jews because they (supposedly) let in Muslims makes no sense at ll.
It sounds as though you just wand to see Jews murdered, and so will take it any way you can get it. *Ugh*.
EdW says
Why to send them ? Since WWII they occupied Germany without signing any official peace treaty (historical fact !!). One of many theories about all this mess we are right now in says that the US is pushing mass immigration to achieve unstability and a weak EU (seen as a direct opponent to US supremacy) and to block any kind of economical or political alliance between Europe – Russia – The New Silk Road economy. Here you can determine the real reasons which also can explain the massive support of Jihadists not only in Syria by agencies of the CIA and others. This all is a big scam and someone is only waiting to get this pot boiling up and explode !!
gravenimage says
What tripe. The US doesn’t set Europe’s immigration policy, either. And the idea that an Islamized Europe would somehow benefit Americans makes no sense, either.
Wellington says
In the same category with a young nothing sporting a Che Guevara t-shirt.
The bright spots in man’s history are few, examples being ancient Athens and early America. The darkness in man’s history is the norm. I wish this weren’t so but sadly it is.
The older I get, the more I appreciate the great exceptions to the human species because they are so few and far between. Even generally good people are generally useless because, while some good people will fight against evil and ignorance, most good people will do nothing.
gravenimage says
Wellington wrote:
In the same category with a young nothing sporting a Che Guevara t-shirt.
……………………
Actually, Wellington, I think it is generally worse than this.
When I was at university I got in the habit of asking morons sporting such shirts what it was that they liked about Che. Most couldn’t give me any answer at all, and some mumbled something vague about his being a freedom fighter. I never ran across a single one who knew what Che Guevara was, what he believed, or what he had done.
This is bad enough, certainly–but I imagine most of these Muslims know *exactly* what this shirt is about, and approve.
jim says
Che was openly racist towards blacks, and also openly homophobic. Yet the lefties still love him, for whatever reason. I believe he said that blacks were destroyers of civilization, and that advanced culture could never have been developed in Africa. Normally a cardinal sin, but if you are a violent communist all is forgiven.
Nick says
it’s truly sad that the liberal western European culture and the United States of America are so politically correct and gullible to allow Muslims freely into their countries. In the long term, the consequences will prove to be disastrous. They are coming to Europe and the United States with one objective. To overrun their host country and to impose Sharia law. One day, but soon enough, I hope that the do-gooder liberals understand this.
Trish says
Their descendants will know nothing but Sharia law.
I don’t believe the West needs feminism with one exception. EVERY Muslima needs to shed her burka and other Islamic garb and adopt her NEW FREE Country’s customs, cultures and laws, including forcing these countries to give them divorces and custody so the children are not radicalized
gravenimage says
Many Muslim women actually practice Islam themselves.
tim gallagher says
I imagine that it’s probably a pretty popular T shirt amongst the Muslims, who are always all about invading and violently imposing Islam on everyone in the world. Regardless of whether it is printed on a T shirt or not, this plan of conquest, and this celebration of previous conquests, is surely in the minds of most Muslims all the time. Violent conquest seems to be what Islam is all about and always has been about. It has brought so much bloodshed and misery to the human race for 1400 years so far. Without a doubt, this man has absolutely no chance of being a good citizen of whatever non-Muslim country he ends up in. How stupid it is to let him in.
Maghi says
100% CORRECT!!
Trish says
I think we ALL know by now that Obuma was an illegal immigrant who smuggled millions of Muslims into America while he was in power.
Peacelover says
Then there is the ‘non-violent'(at least temporarily) type of jihad in which they slowly seep into a system,a country,like what is happening now in the U.S.. After 9/11 and us going over there,they’ve tried this other approach and I think it is slowly working for them by affecting our schools,colleges,entertainment,etc. Also.as this site has said ‘However, in any given social context, as Islam takes greater root — increasing numbers of followers, the construction of more mosques and “cultural centers,” etc. — the greater the likelihood that some number of its adherents will take its violent precepts seriously. This is the problem that the West faces today.’
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the comments, Maghi and Peacelover. There may be a few Muslims who are OK by some kind of miracle, but, for anyone who knows the content of violent Islam, or even just someone who sees the trouble caused by Muslims in every non-Muslim country foolish enough to let them, Muslims are always trouble out of all proportion, when compared to, say, Buddhists or Christians, so I believe the only sensible answer is to shut Muslims out in the way that Hungary and the other Visegrad bloc countries do. Keep these barbarians out and avoid the endless trouble they always bring. Peacelover, you are right about the way Muslims do “slowly seep” into a country and then, when their numbers have grown, start all the usual trouble they inevitably cause. When it comes to Islam, it really is them or us, because Islam is 100% incompatible with our values. I keep thinking that it’s about time everyone woke up to this truth, even the really slow learners.
Peacelover says
I agree. Have you checked out Robert Spencer’s book Stealth Jihad? A good read.
Peacelover says
Great read rather.
tim gallagher says
Peacelover, I have read two of Robert Spencer’s books. The first one was “Islam Unveiled” back in around 2002 when I was just starting to look into Islam. I came across it in a local library and thought it was the best book I had come across about Islam at that time. I hadn’t heard of Robert Spencer until coming across that book. I read “The History of Jihad” last year. I’m sure all his books would be pretty good. I mostly just visit Jihad Watch these days. I live in Australia and I simply noticed over the years how Muslims begin to cause more trouble as they build up their numbers. That is the main way I have come to realise the way things work with Islam. In the 1980’s there weren’t all that many Muslims here and there wasn’t much trouble. During the 1990’s, here in Australia, as Muslim numbers built up, there was trouble, lots of Muslim crime gangs, rape gangs, sheikhs saying disgusting things about our western way of life, would be terrorists and it has got worse since then as Muslim numbers have grown. I also notice how bad things are in many European countries, where they have large Muslim populations. So observing the endless trouble Muslims always bring, plus reading up a bit on the evil content of islam, has woken me up. Then I began to write to our politicians out here to try and wake them up, because I figured most of them seemed clueless about Islam’s nature.
James Lincoln says
tim gallagher,
Congratulations!
You have become well-informed regarding the evil religious/ideology of islam. And you continue to improve your knowledge base. All freedom loving Westerners should do the same!
There has NEVER been an instance in history when muslim migrants have IMPROVED the host country.
It’s ALWAYS a bad thing for the host country, how bad is in direct proportion to the number of muslim migrants brought in…
tim gallagher says
Yeah, I think I know a reasonable amount about Islam’s evil nature by now, James. We just need to have far more people in our societies to read up on Islam and wake the hell up. I have mentioned this before here at Jihad Watch, but you may not have read it. When Muslims first began to show up in Australia, I didn’t think there was a problem with that. I didn’t have a clue. Way back in 1979, there was a Belgian guy visiting Australia, who was a friend of someone I knew, and the Belgian said to me, “Australia is a terrific place, just don’t let Muslims in or they will wreck it”. I remember saying, “Oh, I think it’ll turn out OK” or some such thing. I look back and I am amazed at what extraordinary insight that Belgian guy had way back then. He must have been one of the earliest people to wake up (I mean apart from all those historical figures who were wide awake to Islam, such as John Quincy Adams, Churchill, Alexis de Tocqueville, et al).
gravenimage says
“Refugee” “child” in Europe wears t-shirt celebrating Islamic conquest of Constantinople in 1453
………………….
Oh, joy. sarc/off
I have mentioned here before that not long after 9/11 there was a Western reporter interviewing a group of men and boys–in I think it was Indonesia–all of whom were vociferously claiming that no real Muslim would have committed such an act. And there was one of the boys wearing that hideous t-shirt with Osama bin Laden looming over the burning Twin Towers. I kept waiting for the reporter to take notice and say something–but he never did. A completely surreal moment–but there have been many such since.
Wellington says
Proving yet again, gravenimage, that with Buttlims and reporters any amount of ignorance or stupidity is possible.
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
Nicu says
That ” child ” ( we were told lies that only little girls come – of course ) — shows their true intentions ! Imagine wearing a swastika T – Shirt here ?! But they do whatever they want and get pampered by our traitor leaders ! Thank you EU , thank you Merkel !
RichardL says
Nicu, get out while you still can. Life in the US is like a dream…
gravenimage says
I don’t think we should surrender Europe to Muslims.
andra says
This nice young man has come to Hannover, Germany. The Lower Saxony Government wanted him to come, because they wanted to rescue cute little girls of about four years, who were living on themselves in Greece.
But what a surprise, most of these cute little girls look like him. These refugees are really well gendered.
John Allan says
That comment was ‘disengenderous’.
Niemoller says
Different rules for different fools. We in the West have been trained to be embarrassed about 1492. I guess we’ve become oversensitive fools. Islamist fools–a fool of semi-literate ignorance–are very proud of destroying cultures objectively better than Islamic despot theocracy; they are all arrogance, no conscience. Happily, they are on the path for their comeuppance, but sadly, it is causing pain for all of humanity, just as destroying the nazis did.
John Allan says
Well, come the next election, every voter should tell the ever hopefuls to do what the majority of the electorate expects of them, or don’t bother to ask for their vote.