A petition signed by over 123,000 people to date asked the British government to release a report on the rape gangs that have plagued the country for decades. It’s easy to see why the government doesn’t want to release the report: it will show that the rape gangs are overwhelmingly Muslim, and often explicitly motivated by Islamic theology regarding the permissibility of making sex slaves of Infidel women. So in response to the petition, the government doesn’t even mention the report, much less explain why it isn’t releasing it. But it does say this:
Child sexual abusers come from all walks of life, and from many different age groups, communities, ethnicities and faiths. Abuse is abuse, and misplaced sensitivities must never be allowed to put any child at risk. We are clear that police forces must continue to fully investigate these heinous crimes whenever and wherever they occur, and to ensure that anyone found responsible is prosecuted.
There are a few non-Muslims among the rape gang members, just as anywhere in any circumstances, people engage in copycat behavior. But this is plain denial and an obvious coverup.
No one wants to face the hard facts, but this is why this sort of thing keeps happening: a survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK has previously said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam. Thus it came as no surprise when Muslim migrants in France raped a girl and videoed the rape while praising Allah and invoking the Qur’an. And the victim of an Islamic State jihadi rapist recalled: “He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God…He said that raping me is his prayer to God.”
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
But none of this can be spoken in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain today.
keith says
The politicians don’t want to upset their new masters. And of course the public backlash against the Islamic community would be severe.
Not all Mudslimes are evil, however most evil acts are committed by Mudslimes. And the UK goverment doesn’t want the truth coming into the light.
Terry Gain says
Not all Muslims are evil, but all Muslims are adherents of an evil ideology. Muslims who are not evil should be encouraged to renounce Islam.
Ade Fegan says
Agreed
mortimer says
Our slogan: ‘It’s the IDEOLOGY, stupid.’
Jayell says
Interesting point. No person is absolutely compelled to identify or associate with anything. Therefore, at the end of the day, no one absolutely HAS to be a muslim. Islam is demonstrably an evil ideology, therefore those who voluntarily subscribe to it or do not dissociate themselves from it (which is every muslim) is ipso facto voluntarily subscribing to an evil ideology. How can anyone who chooses to identify with, or remian identified with, an evil ideology be anything other than an evil person?
Rob Roy says
Islam is evil and so is every muslim. *sorry* I gave up on searching for the good, bad, really, really bad experiences. Because somebody does not practises the some ideas of islam, does not make it okay. He ignores them for the moment. Why does Japan restrict muslims so much? No mosques, no arabic writings, controlling all muslims on email, letter, phone,…! As long there is this ideology, as long their is danger. And no… islam is not a religion!! The ‘west’ just gave it the status in a time there was no idea of totalitarian political systems.
abu taleb says
> How can anyone who chooses to identify with, or remian identified with, an evil ideology be anything other than an evil person?
Probably there are muslims who are not evil but they just don’t realize that what they practice according to Islam is evil? But I think, every human being deep inside knows what is good and bad, so it is not an excuse that a person doesn’t know that what he/she does is evil.
Even if a muslim is not following Islamic practice because he/she knows it is evil, still he/she is an accomplice of crime commited by his/her fellow muslims.
gravenimage says
Rob Roy–with all respect–you are mistaken in believing that Japan does not have Mosques:
https://traveltriangle.com/blog/mosques-in-japan/
Japan has low immigration overall and is far geographically from places infested with Islam, and so has fewer problems with Islam.
And the idea that those Westerners who fought Islam for centuries had not idea what Islam was is also mistaken. You can acknowledge that Islam is a religion and still know that it is evil and should be fought.
Dnyaneshwar says
Wait for some more years and then definitely you will say 99% Muslims are evil.
Westman says
Gosh, it’s like liberal education – nobody gets an “F”. Poor, misunderstood, yet never responsible, Islam.
R Russell says
Remember they sat on a report of the same type of behaviour for 3 years in Scotland.
But that shouldn’t be a surprise as the Justice Minister in Scotland is named Humza Yousaf. It is interesting, with a search engine, to see how he behaved in years gone by.
He even wanted to bring to Scotland, Arabs from Gaza.
John says
The Scots should push them behind Hadrians Wall and make sure they don’t come back like they did to the Romans.
gravenimage says
Muslims are infiltrating our police and security, to disastrous effect.
pragmatist says
And the Civil Service, Local Government and, increasingly national government. It’s a slow process, but they are getting there.
gravenimage says
Also grimly true, pragmatist.
pragmatist says
There has not been, nor will there be, a backlash against the Islamic community. There was no backlash in response to several terror attacks – even the Manchester outrage – and, similarly, enough people were made aware of the rape gangs to have instigated a backlash, but it never happened. In my opinion it is a backlash FROM the Muslim community which the government fear, should they publish all the findings.
gravenimage says
+1
Phil Copson says
“….And of course the public backlash against the Islamic community would be severe….”
——————————————————————————————————–
No, it wouldn’t – and it’s the claim that there would be a “public back-lash” that gives officialdom the excuse they want not to tackle the problem by going along with the pretence that muslims are always the victims and have to be protected and pandered to at every turn.
There would no more be any general intimidation and assaults on muslims, than there were on Irish families over the activities of the IRA / on Welsh people due to the burning of English-owned properties by Welsh nationalists / or on Chinese people due to a dislike of Communism.
Releasing the report result in calls from the public for the police and courts to do their actual job for once, and from parents for schools and social workers to warn pupils about the activities of rape-gangs, but it is never going to bring about the mythical “back-lash”…..
J. Worth says
This is a very intelligent response, it is very rare that the English are sufficiently roused to action, all that is required is to enforce the law, as you suggest. The problem with endless appeasement is that the followers of the prophet have total contempt for liberals who try and empathise with them and tell them how unfairly they’re treated. Throughout the ’30’s as Germany built huge armaments the French and English intellectuals convinced themselves that it was their power that was inciting the Germans, even to the point of scuttling a battleship to prove how we were their friends. Had we simply enforced the treaty of Versailles by the use of nothing more that the police, the 2nd war might have been avoided. As it was millions of lives were lost. This is the tragedy of the civilised West, we always wait until the perceived problem is too huge to ignore before we act. Unless we calmly resolve the problem through the law we won’t have world war 3 but we may have the tenth crusade.
gravenimage says
Yes–the is the idea that the government cannot admit that Muslims are raping our children because *Britons* are violent. What calumny and grotesque projection. It is the rapist Muslims who are violent.
Wellington says
“…from many different age groups, communities, ethnicities and faiths.”
Yes, but one group of people, i.e., Muslim men, engage in such heinous activities far, far, far out of proportion to their numbers.
Imagine ten ideologies, numbered one through ten, and in particular all those males who adhere to these ideologies. And let’s suppose ideology six produces 95% of males who engage in sexual abuse of children while the other nine ideologies combined, respecting male believers, produce the other 5%. How rational is it to think that ideology six has nothing to do with child sexual abuse anymore than the other nine ideologies combined—age groups, communities, blah, blah, blah aside? Rational conclusion: Ideology six would be instrumental to such abuse while the other nine ideologies would be incidental to such abuse.
This, thus and verily, is the monumental stupidity we are faced with in the West today because Islam, the most wretched religion ever created by man, the most influential wicked religion ever created by man, still is exculpated from its inherent despicable sanctions, including death for apostasy (e.g., Sura 4:89) and rape (examples to be found in Suras 4, 23, 33 and 70—“captives of the right hand” and similar Islamic rot along these lines). And deep and profound shame on EVERY Muslim for continuing to think, to believe, that Islam is something good. Nothing could be further from the truth. EVERY Muslim, no exception, is at the very least a very confused human being. Many are simply evil PRECISELY because of Islam.
Oh yeah, monumental stupidity. Not Islam—no, it is “simply” rooted in massive error. But the sin first and foremost upon the heads of non-Muslims who keep making excuses for the most evil and widespread religion ever created by man.
gravenimage says
+1
Islam is the only faith that sacralizes rape and child abuse, and whose founder and “perfect man” was both a pedophile and rapist.
mortimer says
Kafir women are ‘MUBAA’ (licit).
John says
The statistics in the hypothetical case you mentioned would say to me that ideology six has the rape and sexual abuse of children ingrained in its culture but the rest of them are just individual cases.
gravenimage says
UK government: “Child sexual abusers come from many different age groups, communities, ethnicities and faiths”
………………….
Well, yeah–except that the phenomenon of child sex grooming is almost entirely a Muslim phenomenon in modern Britain. Can’t have anyone admit that, though…
mortimer says
Only in Islam is it NOT a crime to rape women from other religions.
Kafir women are ‘MUBAA’ (fair game or ‘licit’).
Praying Trumplican (@SRumzi) says
I am a Coptic woman who immigrated to the US 42 years ago. YES! You are so right. I have many decent and wonderful Muslim friends back where I was born but when it comes down to it, Islam is more important and adhered to than friendships or anything else. And the rape of women and children of infidels is not a sin to them. It is a right. When I came here I thought I was getting away and they followed. Very disheartening because the take over happens slowly and it is a slippery slope. Americans are kind and accepting but they need to wake up.
gravenimage says
Glad you got out, PT.
pragmatist says
Yes, and the government have used that argument to make it appear that the Muslim rape gangs are a just minor part of an overall large problem. As usual, of course, with the help of the MSM, which has either not mentioned the petition or else has headlined the fact that “Mulsim gangs are not a significant problem”, the vast bulk of the British public will happily buy into the suggestion that the real threat comes from white rapists. All of this is a smokescreen to draw attention from the fact that the enquiry was set up specifically by Sajid Javid to investigate the extent of Muslim involvement. Obviously with 84% of the country being white there will be a predominance of white crime – that was never the question.
Michael Copeland says
“The report found that 84% of ‘grooming gang’ offenders were (South) Asian, while they only make up 7% of total UK population and that the majority of these offenders are of Pakistani origin with Muslim heritage.”
That was the report by Quilliam, the muslim “think tank”. Its two authors are of Pakistani heritage. One,
Haras Rafiq, said:
“I’m from the heart of where one of the biggest high-profile cases has happened over the last few years, and I’m saying it’s very important that we do talk about it because the problem won’t go away. We didn’t want there to be a pattern of people from our ethnic demographic carrying out these attacks. But unfortunately, we were proven wrong.”
https://www.quilliaminternational.com/press-release-new-quilliam-report-on-grooming-gangs/
gravenimage says
A good report.
Of course, Quilliam will *never* admit that this has anything to do with Islam.
mortimer says
ISLAM CONSIDERS SLAVES TO BE A CATEGORY OF ‘ANIMALS’
– note black slaves are worth half the value of white slaves in Sharia law
Sunan an-Nasa’i Vol5, Book 44 Hadith 4625 – Selling Animals for Animals of Different Amounts or Quality (Classification Sahih)
It was narrated that Jabir Sair:
“A slave came and gave his pledge to the Messenger of Allah to emigrate, and the Prophet did not realize that he was a slave. Then his master came looking for him. The Prophet said; ‘Sell him to me.’ So he bought him for two black slaves, then he did not accept until he had asked; ‘Is he a slave?”’
jayell says
Yes, child abusers can indeed come from a wide ??variety of backgrounds. But the vast majority and by far the worst come from just one – which wouldn’t have much to do with your local church, synagogue or temple. Which rather narrows the field, doesn’t it?
mortimer says
Yes, but Islam is the only world religion whose founder is a child abuser.
-No less than 20 Islamic sources—such as the hadiths of Ahmad bin Hanbal—relay that Muhammad used to suck on the tongues of boys and girls”
-A hadith relayed by Abu Hurreira (deemed an extremely reliable narrator), where Muhammad sucked on the tongues of his cousin (and future caliph) Ali’s two boys, Hassan and Hussein.
-Musnad of Ibn Hanbal: “Muhammad would not sleep until he sucked the tongue of his daughter Fatima and nuzzled his face in her bosom.”
jayell says
I think that was my point. If the vast majority of offenders don’t go to churches, or synagogues, or temples, you’ll find them them all in mosques, won’t you? But don’t tell the UK Government that because they’ll accuse you of ‘undermining community cohesion’ (but they never say which community!)
Michael Copeland says
“Community cohesion” translated……..Muslim privilege
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/04/a-lexicon-for-politically-correct-multiculturalists/
Otter says
The West will never wake up because it is now under the cultural control of the left. The left will go to any extreme to cover up even the most heinous offenses committed by Muslims under the influence of Islam.
gravenimage says
Actually, a *lot* of Britons are upset about these child rape gangs, and that authorities keep lying about the perpetrators mean that a lot of people are on to them.
LB says
And what are they doing to fight back? I’ll tell you: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!! Even if by some miracle all non-muslims in UK wake up to the muslim threat, they would still choose to do nothing because the “progressive” leftist brainwashing runs so deep that any form of resistance against your oppressors is considered “barbaric” and “immoral”, so they’d rather go extinct than do something “uncivilized” as fighting back. In one of his speeches, Robert Spencer mentions the dilemma of the “civilized man” when faced with the “uncivilized brute”. Spoiler alert: the “uncivilized barbarian” wins.
There’s also much of desensitized “as long as it’s not happening to me I don’t care” attitude. But that’s just an excuse to cover up their COWARDICE! Nobody is willing to put their life on the line anymore. Tommy Robinson did and look what’s happening to him. The UK government made an example of him to make sure no one gets the crazy idea of standing up to it and its globalist agenda.
The future looks grim for UK, the once mightiest empire in the world. It would seem all empires are destined to fall, one way or another…
John says
In my experience there’s only one way of dealing with people and that is dealing with them on their level. You deal with a gentleman like a gentleman. Deal with a barbarian like a barbarian. You cannot deal with people in a language they don’t understand.
gravenimage says
Britons are demanding that the government come clean about the background of the child rape gangs. There’s a petition. This is a start.
pragmatist says
A ‘lot’, perhaps but proportionately very much a minority. If my acquaintance – limited admittedly – is at all representative of the public at large then nothing will change. I am astonished by the number I know who, even now, seem to know little or nothing about the rape gangs, and don’t see any problems with Muslims in our society. This appears to stem from the fact that they rely for all their information on the UK MSM ( which is complicit in concealment and playing things down) – they generally seem completely unaware of any alternative media sources and any they do know about they just dismiss as biased right wing and refuse to read them. They believe, without exception, that any problems they have heard about are perpetrated by an untypical tiny minority. I know one woman who doesn’t even believe that the rape gangs are predominately Muslim – she thinks that it is a racist smear. As for TR – forget it, they all buy into the MSM racist, fascist, bigot narrative. I rarely bother to try and discuss the problem any more, it’s just a waste of time.
sophicproperty says
Salaam Otter, (what a fuuny handle )?
Have a go at your people 1st.
In 2004 the director of public prosecutions told police not to prosecute “South Asian” rape gangs to prevent Islamophia.
That director was SIR Kier Stramer … now elected as leader of the Labour party.
His 1st action … promote MP Naz Shah to his front bench …she had previously said “it was good for English girls to keep quiet about being raped as it was not good for diversity”.
No need for Muslims to do a thing … Labour is managing it all. They need us to stay in power
If your government is willing to sacrifice your own granddaughters ..well then you are indeed on your way to Islamic rule ….be a good doggy and take that in your pipe and smoke it with Marijuana … you will feel no discomfort and forget everything …peace…
More Later ….
Rezali
gravenimage says
sophicproperty wrote:
Salaam Otter, (what a fuuny (sic) handle )?
…………………
Why is Rezali Mehil posting under a pseudonym?
Is she somehow involved with this company? It is located in Buckinghamshire.
More:
Have a go at your people 1st.
In 2004 the director of public prosecutions told police not to prosecute “South Asian” rape gangs to prevent Islamophia.
That director was SIR Kier Stramer … now elected as leader of the Labour party.
His 1st action … promote MP Naz Shah to his front bench …she had previously said “it was good for English girls to keep quiet about being raped as it was not good for diversity”.
…………………
Note that Rezali Mehil has *no* problem with her vicious coreligionists raping children. But why would she? She have previously taken a stand in favor of child “marriage” and of enslaving Infidels.
More:
No need for Muslims to do a thing … Labour is managing it all. They need us to stay in power
…………………
Muslims make up about 5% of the population in Britain. Appalling, but *hardly* some sort of majority. She is right about Labour and others enabling Muslim rape gangs, though–much to their shame.
More:
If your government is willing to sacrifice your own granddaughters ..well then you are indeed on your way to Islamic rule ….be a good doggy and take that in your pipe and smoke it with Marijuana … you will feel no discomfort and forget everything …peace…
…………………
*This* is what Muslims think of their victims.
More:
More Later ….
Rezali
…………………
Another threat.
Wellington says
Excellent reply, gravenimage, to a creep.
gravenimage says
She’s a particularly nasty Mohammedan, Wellington.
James Lincoln says
The British people have a right to see the government report on the rape gangs that have plagued the country for decades.
In a sane society, it would be court ordered…
GreekEmpress says
I agree Mr. Lincoln.
I take it there is no Freedom of Information Act in England????
mortimer says
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_2000
Kalim Alaka says
Genital mutilation must be administered on these men that they should be deterred from their activities……………???
tim gallagher says
What a moronically stupid statement that is by the government. Rapists come from all types of backgrounds. Well, duh. Abuse is abuse. Well, duh. What meaningless garbage it is. It says nothing. Of course, there are rapists from all backgrounds, but, if Muslims provide a far bigger percentage of the rapists than other types of people do, which I’m sure would be true (because the vile behaviour is actually condoned by their evil ideology), then that is very significant. What an idiot you would have to be to write such a meaningless statement as the one mentioned here. Yeah, abuse is abuse and rapists come from all types of backgrounds. Geez, how profound. It is good to see that 123,000 people were fired up enough to sign the petition.
mortimer says
Hope the petition leaders hire lawyers to get the secret report via the Freedom of Information Act (2000).
tim gallagher says
That would be good if they could do that, Mortimer. I imagine the UK government would be trying every trick in the book to try to prevent that happening. I was also thinking that, maybe, 123,000 people signing the petition isn’t that great a result out of a population of 60 million or something like that. It probably is a pretty good number though as the average punter in most countries is pretty apathetic. I certainly do hope that the truth will come out about these Muslim rape gangs in the UK despite the UK government’s attempts to prevent that happening. It’s about bloody time the truth came out.
ntesdorf says
So! Watch out for those Presbyterian Rapist Gangs, folks.
Ade Fegan says
and the Mormons .. don’t forget the Mormons !
mortimer says
Islam is the only religion that officially endorses sexual slavery by divine decree.
Jason says
Not to downplay the seriousness of the gangs activities, but the real issue is the police coverup. The investigation should be identifying who covered for the gangs and why (and prosecuting them for criminal negligence). This ‘statement’ makes it clear that the government has no intention of admitting that this even happened.
Terry Gain says
I cannot provide a link at this time but there have been reports that the government of Gordon Brown, and I assume subsequent governments, ordered the police not to take action against these Muslim rapists. The attitude seems to have been that these working class girls were consenting, however I assume that England has laws against statutory rape so the police could have acted had the government not told them to stand down.
gravenimage says
Terry, is this article the one you were looking for?
“LABOUR’S COVER-UP: Gordon Brown’s Government ‘Urged’ Police Not To Investigate Muslim Grooming Gangs”
https://www.politicalite.com/lab/labour/labours-cover-up-gordon-browns-government-urged-police-not-to-investigate-muslim-grooming-gangs/
The Former North West Chief Prosecutor alleged that the Home Office ordered police to ignore grooming gang claims in 2008.
Nazir Afzal, told the BBC that in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular email to all police forces calling on them to not investigate the sexual exploitation of young girls in towns and cities across the UK.
mortimer says
Agree. It’s a coverup which no doubt protects politicians who suppressed the vile information and were bribed by Muslim leaders to do so.
Sharia law contains no punishment for the rape of a kafir.
mortimer says
SEXUAL ENSLAVEMENT IS ENTIRELY ISLAMIC and a NORMATIVE PART OF ISLAMIC CULTURE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_slavery_in_Islam
Sexual slavery in Islam results from the permission in Islamic law for men to have sexual intercourse with the female slaves they own. Legal and literary documents show that those slaves used for sexual service were differentiated at slave markets from those who were intended mainly for domestic services. These slave girls were called “slaves for pleasure” (muṭʿa, ladhdha) or “slave-girls for sexual intercourse” (jawārī al-waṭ). Many female slaves became concubines to their owners and bore their children. Others were just used for sex before being transferred. The allowance for men to use contraception with female slaves assisted in thwarting unwanted pregnancies.
Early sources indicate that sexual slavery of women was viewed as both a male privilege and a privilege for the victor over the defeated. Islamic legal texts state that sexual pleasure was a male privilege over women. Men were permitted to have as many concubines as they could afford. Some men purchased female slaves, whereas Muslim soldiers in the early Islamic conquests were given female captives as a reward for military participation. As the slaves for pleasure were typically more expensive, they were a privilege for elite men.[
John says
Now the generous benefits systems of western countries makes financially incentivizes the taking of multiple wives. They do not need to be able to afford to care for them by their own means.
jca reid says
BOLLOX!! Simply pandering to the Muslims AGAIN! Pakistani men are 2% of the UK population, yet they commit 84% of the sex crimes in UK. A 4400% over representation. Collusion from former Prime Ministers, other Senior politicians, councillors, social workers, Police Officers…. the lot, even including the Crown Prosecution Service! New Labour Leader, Keir Starmer is in it up past his ears as he colluded to stifle Reports into these issues with then PM G. Brown back in 2010-12. If the tories don’t punish those responsible, they’ll go the same way as Labour!
rooare says
Of course there are rapists and child abusers from all groups of people. Yet only In Islam is this behavior divinely sanctioned, in other groups it’s considered criminal behavior. This statement by the government is whataboutism on steroids.
MI3rdDistrict says
They all look like muslims to me! “Religion” of peace, love and caring huh? Right. Rise up England and deport those pieces of human sh!t.