Islamic supremacist Azfal Khan, alias Labour MP Afzal Khan, alias Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Commons Azfal Khan, has just bettered himself by appealing to the government he’s working to abolish for help in dealing with English nationalist and veteran counter-jihadist Tommy Robinson. Much as perpetrators of jihad loathe institutions that promulgate “laws of men,” it is not beneath them to infiltrate such institutions and sit on their benches at infidel taxpayers’ expense, as brother Azfal here does. And it is further not beneath them, when out-manoeuvred by an enemy of Islam, to throw themselves upon the sympathy of those very promulgators of “laws of men,” and beg them to do what they can to stymie that enemy.
Azfal Khan, upon learning of Tommy Robinson’s meteoric rise in popularity on Chinese social media platform TikTok, wasted no time in petitioning the UK government to use their influence with the Chinese government to get Tommy Robinson banned from TikTok. The brother ‘urged the UK government to “take steps to regulate TikTok and ensure that internet firms take responsibility for protecting their users”.…He told Al Jazeera it was worrying that far-right figures have been able to sign up to TikTok “when they have been banned on platforms such as Twitter and Facebook”.’
Yes, dear readers, the Chinese government. That is the government to which Allah has sent the coronavirus, his “little soldiers,” to punish those infidels for treating Muslims so badly in Xinjiang, as so many Muslims who know about such things assured us. So bad is the Chinese government towards Muslims that Allah had to take time out from his busy schedule to mobilise an army against them. That atheist, pig-eating, Muslim-slaying government is what Muslim brother Azfal Khan appealed to deal with the counter-jihad upstart Tommy Robinson.
And if you’re thinking, dear reader, that a hardcore jihad fifth-columnist appealing to prominent, unsavoury infidel institutions for help in dealing with the enemies of Islam has to be a one-off, then do read on.
A little over a year ago, the fascist Muhammed Shafiq, whose Twitter profile reads, “Muslim broadcaster on TV, Radio, Columnist, Chief Executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, @britishmuslimtv,” boasted of his role in getting the same Tommy Robinson, a real thorn in the flesh of jihad operatives, banned from Facebook. Shafiq tweeted:
“I can reveal I recently had a meeting with Facebook to discuss #TommyRobinson pages and their impact in brainwashing his supporters to become terrorist and use violence against Muslims. A very good result and I am proud of my role.”
So let’s take a closer look at the accomplishment of which this Muslim broadcaster and official is so proud. The Jews, nemesis of the Muslims, descendants of apes and pigs, who control the world through their money, and all the other abusive things Muslims daily spout about Jews, they see manifested most strongly in two places: in Israel, the “Little Satan,” and in the United States, the “Great Satan.” But to bring down enemy-of-Islam Tommy Robinson, Muslim brother Muhammed Shafiq had no problem at all, indeed was proud, he said, to have appealed to an American Jew, a billionaire fifty-times over, who does, in a very real sense, control the world with his money.
And if you’re thinking, dear reader, that this is just hardcore jihad fifth-columnists taking on one particular, irksome, loudmouth enemy of Islam and can only be a one-off, then do read on.
One of the main rationales of the BDS movement against Israel is the notion that Israel is an apartheid state, and it explicitly invokes the language of the South African apartheid experience. It’s a hard sell, so you have to say it a lot or scream it loudly. PLO member Mustafa Barghouti manages to wedge “apartheid” into almost every sentence he utters pertaining to Israel, while students on Western university campuses will always turn out in shrill numbers for anything “Palestine.” If you can get the world to associate Israel with apartheid South Africa, even a little, you can do a lot of damage, because that little apartheid would be bad enough. So let us now turn to the real thing.
The South African apartheid government faced concerted opposition from blacks and whites alike, from men and women, from Christians, atheists, Hindus, Muslims and Jews, and had no problem torturing and killing them all. For most aspects of life, most people had little choice but to deal with this government and to beg its officials for whatever dispensation or permission they came to need from time to time. These humiliations were realities of life and everyone understood them that way. But there was a line. To go beyond the bounds of what was essential in dealing with apartheid officials was to behave without dignity, without self-respect. Worldwide, apartheid South Africa was recognised as the ultimate manifestation of racist depravity.
Thirty years ago, South African da’i, that is, a Muslim proselytiser, the late Sheikh Ahmed Deedat, a supremely tedious man who described himself as “qualified to speak on The Satanic Verses,” had begged apartheid South Africa’s censors (“They are reasonable people,” explained Deedat) to ban The Satanic Verses in South Africa. Those “reasonable people” obliged him by not only banning the book, but also banning its author, Salman Rushdie, from entering the country. Sheikh Deedat openly boasted of these accomplishments, and of his successful grovelling before his apartheid masters.
The da’i calls us and the jihadi compels us to embrace the superior religion, the perfect religion, the final religion, and there is no depth to which these best of peoples will not stoop in pursuit of their principled “laws of God.” They are the very negation of dignity and respect, and they are devious, brazen and callous.
mortimer says
Anjuli Pandavar correctly identifies the hypocrisy of Muslims who use freedoms and civil liberties in order to suppress and destroy them. That is their ultimate goal, namely to enslave the world under discriminatory, misogynistic Sharia law.
The discriminatory nature of Sharia is perfectly illustrated in the following Saudi decrees governing indemnities to paid for involuntary manslaughter:
If a person has been killed or caused to die by another, the latter has to pay blood money or compensation, as follows.
100,000 riyals if the victim is a Muslim man
50,000 riyals if a Muslim woman
50,000 riyals if a Christian man
25,000 riyals if a Christian woman
6,666 riyals if a Hindu man
3,333 riyals if a Hindu woman
According to this hierarchy, a Muslim man’s life is worth 33 times more than that of a Hindu woman.
Islam is not compatible with modern human rights codes.
spiro says
Not compatible with sanity
Steve Green says
Devil Worshippers and barbarians
gravenimage says
This is not hypocrisy, Mortimer. Muslims will use anything to advance their foul creed.
JamesC. says
“Anjuli Pandavar correctly identifies the hypocrisy of Muslims who use freedoms and civil liberties in order to suppress and destroy them. That is their ultimate goal, namely to enslave the world under discriminatory, misogynistic Sharia law.”
It sounds as though such Muslims have about as much integrity and religion as Communists; precisely none. Isn’t that paragraph describing a kind of entryism ?
So it seems that Islam is a political cult with a religious veneer, but not, in any sense worth discussing, a religion. A better name might be the Mohammedan Communist Party. MCP ? How very apt.
Lilith Wept says
There is the UN Declaration of Human rights….well the Islamic world read this, and then came up with the Cairo Declaration of human rights where in the preface it says that As far as regards Islamic law these are what the Islamic world consider to be human rights…….
So basically re stating that what the Koran, Sunna and Sira say about human rights…which we all know is muslim men have full human rights, Muslim women have the rights of animals, everyone else ( all non moslems ) has no human rights.
You should read both documents side by side sometime.
mortimer says
Anjuli Pandavar is right again MP Afzal Khan is correctly identified as a “hardcore jihad fifth-columnist”.
Afzal Khan conducts the ‘jihad of the pen’, namely working cynically within the system, and against the system, in order to destroy the system by Islamization.
The Labour Party seems preoccupied with covering up the Muslim rape gang scandal and depriving English working-class girls of protection by the police. The Labour Party sells out the very people that it was created to protect.
The Labour are the fifth columnists … they have no principle but the pursuit of power. They are NOT the party of the workers, but the party of the dot.com billionaires and foreign governments.
Penelope Newsome says
I can reveal I recently had a meeting with Facebook to discuss #TommyRobinson pages and their impact in brainwashing his supporters to become terrorist and use violence against Muslims. A very good result and I am proud of my role.”
We know that Tommy has never suggested using any violence against muslims.So we need to stop this dreadful Afzal Khan from telling such lies. . We know Tommy is not a terrorist and we know that it is Afzal Khan who supports terrorists. This man must be stopped.
Penelope Newsome says
I thought I’d left a Reply: viZ
This dreadful man must be stopped. We know perfectly well that Tommy has never suggested using any violence against muslims. He is using the legal courts of justice and legal media to stop the muslim terror used against unprotected girls .
The Labour Party should immediately state that Afzal Khan is not speaking the truth about Tommy Robinson, but is trying to hide the truth of what muslims have done with their rape gangs.
gravenimage says
+1
Peter Dale says
The tragedy is not the sell-out by the Labour Party to these murderers. The tragedy is that the current Conservative party that has a majority in the House of Commons and so is the British government tolerates this travesty. And let’s not forget that it was a Conservative government that banned Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from entering Britain while allowing various Imams preaching violence to come to London. And it is a Conservative government that is unwilling to publish the report on the rapes of young girls by gangs of Moslems in Rotheram and elsewhere. It is the Conservatives who are doing nothing while Britain is rapidly descending into a Moslem-compliant satrap.
PRCS says
And let’s not forget WHY they’re in power.
They were voted into office by agenda driven voters, abetted by enough of their nation’s clueless voters to put them there.
Phil Copson says
PRCS says
Apr 27, 2020 at 6:51 pm
And let’s not forget WHY they’re in power.
They were voted into office by agenda driven voters, abetted by enough of their nation’s clueless voters to put them there.
—————————————————————————————————
What on earth is an “agenda driven voter” ? and why would any voter – agenda-driven or otherwise – need to be “abetted” by other voters ?
People vote for the party that they think will defend their interests – end of.
I voted Conservative because they were the only chance this country had of leaving the EU, regaining control of it’s courts, borders, economy etc, ending illegal mass-immigration and halting islamisation. They have a slim chance of succeeding in the face of the pro-EU / pro-mass migration, socialist “Deep State”, but that is better than no chance at all had Corbyn’s Labour Party or Swinson’s Lib-Dems taken office.
PRCS says
“What on earth is an “agenda driven voter” ?
:”I voted Conservative because…”.
On my side of ‘the pond’, think Minneapolis.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Phil. No matter that shortcomings of the Conservatives, Labour and the egregious Jeremy Corbyn would have been *many* times worse.
Battle says
Magna Carta.
Battle says
LINOs and CINOs.
tim gallagher says
Mega hypocrites. But they have no morality at all (Islam teaches no morality that I can see, just condones really evil behaviour) and will do and say anything in order to advance the evil and barbaric cause of Islam. Whatever it takes for Islam to take over is all that Muslims believe in.
Thereader says
So right. They follow the agenda and teachings of Satan. Why are our people so blinded?
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the comment, Thereader. I agree. I see islam as Satanically evil and I agree with you in that I also cannot believe how many people in our societies still have not woken up to the evil nature of islam and who still believe that Islam deserves to be treated with respect. There are far too many slow learners in our western societies which is making it easy for Islam to continue to make advances.
PRCS says
As annoying as suppressing freedom of speech on privately run social media platforms is, the use of man-made laws that make lawful what “Allah’ and his messenger made unlawful” to replace them with *divine* laws that actually command their replacement is the goal, of course.
And it’s not limited to the UK.
Every Muslim in American who swears ‘to support and defend’ our man-made Constitution and laws with one hand on Qur’an–which prohibits them from doing so–is a deceit.
A calculated deceit which too many of our friends and neighbors seem not to comprehend.
JamesC. says
One cannot be a faithful Muslim, and a loyal subject of a non-Muslim state. Islam makes Muslims traitors by the very fact of their being Muslims in such states. If that is not a sufficient reason to ban Islam, what is ?
PRCS says
+1
True!
PRCS says
The hijabis in that photo might ‘know’ the veil is mandated by ‘the boss’ himself: Muhammad via his sock puppet ‘Allah’.
The ‘filthy’ uncovered kuffar women, most likely don’t.
Qur’an 33:59 and 24:31.
https://quran.com/33/59
https://quran.com/24/31
gravenimage says
When Muslims Who Reject “Man-made” Laws Resort to Non-Muslim Authorities to Advance Islam
……………….
More of the imposition of Shari’ah.
Battle says
Anjuli Pandavar hits nail on head again.
BBattle says
And look at the fascist hypocrites in the picture.
Rob Roy says
I always hear …. china hold 1 million muslims in camps. but nobody says that before, around 500 deadly attacks against Chinese by muslims per year. Always half the story.
UNCLE VLADDI says
China hates islam as a rival global crime-gang and treats muslims like the dangerous rivals they are.
They’ll probably promote Tommy Robinson as their official ambassador to the Uighurs Shenzhen LOL.
PRCS says
“China hates islam as a rival global crime-gang and treats muslims like the dangerous rivals they are.”
Those who deride Communist China’s treatment of Muslims who–given any opportunity–would try to replace that horrid government with their own horrid version repeatedly called Trump a racist for calling COVID-19 ‘the Chinese virus’ should be challenged to pick their poison.
Anjuli Pandavar says
UV, “China hates islam as a rival global crime-gang and treats muslims like the dangerous rivals they are.’
—
This is correct, and the parallels and similarities are uncanny.
gravenimage says
Yes–Fascism, Communism, and Islam are all totalitarian.