A 15-year-old Hindu minor went to play cricket with his Muslim “friends” who had showed up at his house. He never returned; his dead body was recovered from a river nearby. The financially-challenged family of the boy was beaten up by police personnel, who also forced them to settle for a lofty sum of money, alleges Rohit Jaiswal’s father. No proper postmortem was conducted on the body that was drowned in the river after being tied to a heavy object.
The destitute family eventually had to leave the state of Bihar, which is ruled by a Muslim-abetting Chief Minister who once referred to a terror-accused killed in a police encounter as “The Daughter of Bihar.” She was a Muslim. The 15-year-old Hindu boy, who was indeed the son of the soil, however, got no recognition from this government.
Rohit was taken to the site of an upcoming mosque in the village by his “Muslim friends,” where parents of these children were already present. The bereaved father claims that his teenage child was killed there for the belief that the sacrifice of a Hindu child could make the mosque area more powerful. The incident dates to March 28, but didn’t come to light until recently, as not a single media house had the intestinal fortitude to cover a murder story with Muslims central to the crime.
Rohit is not the first child who was sacrificed at the altar of secularism in order to please the minority in this land.
On January 26, India celebrates its Republic Day. Chandan Gupta’s mother has been observing this day as her son’s death anniversary for the past two years. Processions of youth holding the Indian flag flood Indian roads on this day. When Chandan Gupta entered a Muslim-dominated lane on January 26, 2018, waving the India tricolor with pride, he was opposed by the locals. The altercation heated up and the lad was hit by a bullet. Remember that possessing firearms is illegal in India unless one has a license, which is quite a nut to crack. Still a student, Chandan Gupta died with the national flag in his hand, because he wanted to wave this flag through the streets of his independent country. Salim and his brothers, Wasim and Nasim, were held as the principal accused.
On September 30, 2013, 11-year-old Vidhu Jain was burned alive in broad daylight; locals witnessed him screaming and running covered in flames. He was killed over an argument about kites in Malerkotla, Punjab, which is ruled by a Muslim-abetting government. That the child belonged to India’s micro-minority, the Jains, should have promised prompt justice. But no social or economic status can put one ahead of the Muslims here. His mother, Aarti Jain, filed petitions with the Punjab and Haryana high court accusing five Muslims, after the local police failed to trace the culprits. The latest reports from 2018 show no progress on the case for the past five years. The family had to relocate, putting up their house and shop in Malerkotla on sale, but there were no buyers.
Hindus were slandered worldwide after the alleged rape case of a Kathua minor was brought to the fore by locals and left-leaning media. Washington Post, the UK’s Telegraph and several other international outlets carried this news for months with bold headlines. It was an isolated incident that had a Muslim victim, and hence the world knows her name, Asifa.
Months later, 10-year-old Geeta was raped in a Muslim madrassa; radical Muslim gangs demanded she be married off to her rapist and character assassinated her in deplorable language. Twitter is crowded with Muslims gloating over the brutality wildly and abominably. Twitter CEO Jake Dorsey found none of it opposed to Twitter’s community standards, and allowed the inflow of the horrid messages.
Two-year-old Tinkle Sharma was abducted, brutalized to unspeakable extremes, mutilated bit by bit, and dumped into a garbage bin by two neighbours, Mohammad Zahid and Aslam. The body was recovered with limbs dismembered and eyes gouged out. There were strong suspicions that the toddler had been raped also. As the issue escalated nationally, liberal media houses that had communalized the Asifa Banu case to shreds hastened to preach how this crime must not be communalized.
They also said “don’t communalize” when Asif and Irfan raped and slit the throat of an eight-year-old in Mandsaur, and in innumerable other such blood-curdling cases of rapes, murders, and at times both transpired. These were either denied or downplayed by the police or suppressed by mainstream media.
As Islamic groups have the media wrapped around their little finger and command exponential influence over the political machinery, the barbarities by the Asifs, Zahids or Irfans never get known, much less talked about, criticized, and condemned. Punished? Oh well. Do you the know that the most brutal of the five rapists in the infamous 2012 Delhi rape case got away with a sewing machine and 10 thousand in cash, while others are done to death? His name was Mohammad Afroz.
mortimer says
No journalists are reporting the biggest child abuse scandal taking place in the madrassas.
nicu says
Wasn’t it the same in the UK ? Rothenham ?
gravenimage says
There have been lots of indications that child abuse is rife in Madrassas.
LB says
The children in madrassas are muslims, who are abused by their muslim teachers. While I do abhor child abuse, forgive me for not having much sympathy for muslim children when cases like the ones described above are happening every day all over the world to non-muslim children by–you guessed it–muslims.
Now I can understand the West being cowardly and “progressive” so they dare not oppose the muslims in any way, but Indians? Didn’t they spend a large part of their history under brutal muslim rule? And when you think about it, the muslim conquest of India never really stopped. So why aren’t they doing anything?
I’m aware that India is plagued by the same leftist politicians like the West, but the muslim conquest of Pakistan happened only several decades ago, and it was anything but peaceful. What about the current muslim takeover of Bengal and Kashmir? Are the people of India that quick to forget? Or are they simply cowards like Westerners and are quick to submit?
If there’s a local reading this, please explain to me what goes through the minds of regular Indian folk. And spare me the crap about how you can’t do anything because government=bad; you people number around a billion (don’t know the exact number) so you can do it if you want to, but you clearly don’t.
Dude says
It is long overdue. God almost killed them all a few hundred years back. I wish He had. He will not be displeased if India stands up, and sends these monsters to the hell they beg for.
SherLee says
completely agree
gravenimage says
Dude, did I somehow miss all Muslims almost being killed a few hundred years back? When was this?
Dude says
Like a little after 1500. His saints talked Him out of it, but He did say that if the monsters interfered with His plans again, He would proceed to end them in the blink of an eye. We’re talking The Real Akbhar, not some popcorn ooga-booga desert fantasy ogre.
gravenimage says
Dude, I’m afraid I’m unclear on what you mean here. Are you referring to Akbar the Great, the third Mughal Emperor? Where did God almost wipe out all Muslims?
Sadly, in fact, the Muslim Mughal Empire swallowed most of the Indian subcontinent during his rule, tripling the area under the Muslims heel and pretty much wiping out independent Hindu kingdoms.
There was an assassination attempt in 1564, but this was an attempted power-grab by another high-ranking Muslim in his court. Even if this attempt had been successful, it did not target Muslim rule.
Dude says
“the blink of an eye”…
God don’t need no warriors and swords.
If you don’t know about this, then I guess it has been hidden from you. I have no authority to reveal that which has yet to be revealed. Perhaps you will stumble onto it as you perfect your search for Truth.
nicu says
I love the show JODHA AKbar I admit – but I know it’s far from reality !
gravenimage says
Dude, I am just asking for a simple clarification–I’m sure others here must be curious, as well.
I’m not sure what you are trying to say here–that this is some sort of secret hidden from mankind, except for yourself? Why are you posting here, then, if you cannot make yourself clear?
Keys says
Many things are hidden from me, Dude.
One of them is what you are referring to in this post.
Are you referring to some private revelation that has been given to you ? Or have other individuals or certain saints received this revelation ?
Please clarify.
Dude says
In private, I would happily explain, however the walls have ears and I do not wish to engage the fools or the gangsta cult for fear of what unknown offenses people might create here or what abominable wickedness the thugs may manifest on the innocent.
And let’s face it, there is a reason why many know nothing of this history, why many know very little about it. It is like showing a rose to a dog. He may eat it, slobber all over it or even urinate on it. Some dogs however can appreciate the beauty and the delightful fragrance. They will eventually savour all the lovely petals and revere and love the rose.
So it is with God. First be worthy to see the rose, then appreciate. He doesn’t want us to be offensive and cast ourselves far away from Him. No matter how arrogant and ignorant we are He still cares for us. When we’re ready, then all is revealed.
gravenimage says
OK, Dude–you don’t have to explain anything if it makes you uncomfortable.
I’m a historian, and while there are many aspects of history that are not well-known, I know of none that I would consider secret–unless it is a military secret in an ongoing conflict that would endanger good people if exposed. But that’s just me.
I actually very much appreciate roses, real and metaphorical–but if you want to characterize us as “dogs”, that is certainly your prerogative. I’ll probably just move on to other topics now.
Dude says
Don’t take offense. Compared to God, we’re all dogs. Actually there is no comparison possible, we are infinitesimal.
This is a different dimension. We can’t be the carpenter trying to fix his car’s engine with a hammer and nails. Faith sees the Red Sea parted. History will debate plausibility. It’s not my job to debate.
But in the circle of historians, my input here is simply the barking of a mad dog. And I’m okay with that. Indeed, I am reminded that my fortune is beyond imagination.
gravenimage says
I never characterized you as a mad dog, Dude–I would *never* do that.
And I don’t think that faith and accurate history are actually incompatible–but you can, of course, disagree.
Dude says
I know you would never consider me a mad dog, and for that reason, I present this chapter in an English translation of a famed Bengali biography that documents the episode: http://CauseOfAllCauses.com/bhagm23.htm
gravenimage says
Thank you for that link, Dude. I have read this piece before.
Not every Hindu believes that the historical Chaitanya Bhagavata was actually an incarnation of Krishna, but let’s leave that aside.
Chaitanya Bhagavata talks about allowing his followers to burn down the palace of the local Muslim magistrate Chand Kazi, who has violently threatened those chanting the names of Krishna.
He and his followers dance through the streets, chanting. When he reaches the Kazi’s palace, he makes a threat, saying, “I will obliterate the entire Yavana race from the face of this earth”. (“Yavana” has been translated differently at times, but basically means all non-Hindus).
They ransack the palace, After that, they seem to get worried about what might happen to them, and tell Chaitanya Bhagavata that he is peaceful. Since the Kazi seems to have left town, he agrees.
There is nothing actually supernatural in this account–and Muslims do not even appear to be the main targets, but instead local Atheists.
I had not thought of this piece at all, since its being characterized as God planning to wipe out all Muslims does not really seem to apply here.
Dude says
The muslim ruler, the Kazi was forbidding the execution of the ancient Vedic religion (there is no such thing as ‘hindu’ just as there are no ‘niggers’ – “hindu” is simply a mispronunciation of Sindhu (the river at the border of India) caused by the muslims’ inability to say “s”).
The Kazi had been shutting down all Vedic rituals (as I’m sure is part of their current plan). Caitanya had incarnated to establish the dharma (religious process) of this age. And the Kazi’s savage cult would not get in His way.
Lord Caitanya’s attraction gathered millions carrying millions of torches. They moved en masse to the Kazi’s palace and trampled it into the ground. The Kazi would not dare oppose the Vedic religion ever again.
It is mentioned how Caitanya as Krsna simply by raising His eyebrow destroys entire worlds. In other chapters it is made very clear that at the time it was the muslim invasion that produced such unhappiness throughout previously happy peaceful Bharata (India – like the Apache for some reason? Still?).
Yavanas are sometimes called mlecchas or flesh-eaters. My own gut feel is that the flesh-eaters were shamed and ostracized from the ancient Vedic society, and forced to escape to the deserts. There they created their own religions in which God now allowed flesh eating.
So when we hear that the entire race of Yavanas will be destroyed, we must understand that everyone opposed to the Vedas would be ended, but since they would be killed by God, they would take rebirth in a higher state of consciousness. There is no doubt that God wanted them torched (at least the sects driven to destroy Vedic supremacy) – as I’m sure He does right now.
So let it be written, so let it be done.
Dude says
I should point out that the biography is called Sri Caitanya Bhagavata, but the object of the bio is just Caitanya, aka Sri Krsna Caitanya Mahaprabhu, Gauranga, Gaura, Visvambhara, Nimai Pandit, and on and on.
Hammer and nails cannot reach the truth here. The proof of the pudding is in the tasting, as they say. It is delicious and is an absolute proof, far beyond mundane logic, words or idioms. It is true to the core of our beings, leaving no doubt at all.
But of course leaving no way to convey that absolute proof to others. There is no shortcut, no Tower of Babel. The only trick is sincerity, and that takes a while (we have so many other desires that demand our attention).
gravenimage says
Dude wrote:
The muslim ruler, the Kazi was forbidding the execution of the ancient Vedic religion (there is no such thing as ‘hindu’ just as there are no ‘niggers’ – “hindu” is simply a mispronunciation of Sindhu (the river at the border of India) caused by the muslims’ inability to say “s”).
……………………..
Well, this claim is really bizarre. Muslims say “s” all the time–there is “Shams” (Syria), Al-Sheba’ab, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan–I could go on and on, but why bother?
Arabic even has Shîn (ش), which specifically makes an “sh” sound.
And why would Muslims be unable to pronounce “s”, in any case? Muslims come from all sorts of cultural and linguistic backgrounds–most Muslims in the Indian subcontinent came from Hindu stock, just as most Muslims in the Middle East come of Christian and Jewish stock if you go back far enough. None of these people are unable to pronounce “s”, anymore than modern Hindus, Christians, or Jews are.
Then, the idea that “Hindu” is a pejorative like “n****r* makes no sense. Hindus refer to *themselves* as Hindus, and Hindu political parties in India are called “Hindutva”. Why would Hindus bow to (supposed) Muslim norms in places where they make up a clear majority, or in the West where until recently there were few Muslims?
More:
The Kazi had been shutting down all Vedic rituals (as I’m sure is part of their current plan). Caitanya had incarnated to establish the dharma (religious process) of this age. And the Kazi’s savage cult would not get in His way.
……………………..
Well, this is certainly true. Muslims shut down Hindu worship when in power just as they have done the same to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jains, and all other non-Muslims. There is no freedom of religion in Islam.
More:
Lord Caitanya’s attraction gathered millions carrying millions of torches. They moved en masse to the Kazi’s palace and trampled it into the ground. The Kazi would not dare oppose the Vedic religion ever again.
……………………..
Actually, while I don’t know the fate of this one Muslim tyrant, Muslim thugs would indeed oppose Hinduism many times after that–including today.
More:
It is mentioned how Caitanya as Krsna simply by raising His eyebrow destroys entire worlds. In other chapters it is made very clear that at the time it was the muslim invasion that produced such unhappiness throughout previously happy peaceful Bharata (India – like the Apache for some reason? Still?).
……………………..
Maybe so–but in the story you sent me, the destruction of the Kazi’s palace was a lot more pedestrian–the mob just ransacked the place.
More:
Yavanas are sometimes called mlecchas or flesh-eaters. My own gut feel is that the flesh-eaters were shamed and ostracized from the ancient Vedic society, and forced to escape to the deserts. There they created their own religions in which God now allowed flesh eating.
……………………..
The first time “Yavana” was used was apparently in reference to the Greeks–that is, to Alexander the Great’s short-lived invasion of part of India.
And many Hindus eat meat, as well–even many who eschew beef still eat poultry and lamb.
This term may indeed have been applied to Muslims at some times–I can’t find any reference to that, though.
More:
So when we hear that the entire race of Yavanas will be destroyed, we must understand that everyone opposed to the Vedas would be ended, but since they would be killed by God, they would take rebirth in a higher state of consciousness. There is no doubt that God wanted them torched (at least the sects driven to destroy Vedic supremacy) – as I’m sure He does right now.
So let it be written, so let it be done.
……………………..
Could be–I haven’t seen this happening, though.
More:
I should point out that the biography is called Sri Caitanya Bhagavata, but the object of the bio is just Caitanya, aka Sri Krsna Caitanya Mahaprabhu, Gauranga, Gaura, Visvambhara, Nimai Pandit, and on and on.
Hammer and nails cannot reach the truth here. The proof of the pudding is in the tasting, as they say. It is delicious and is an absolute proof, far beyond mundane logic, words or idioms. It is true to the core of our beings, leaving no doubt at all.
……………………..
No, logic is not mundane. And anything that cannot be proven through logic and–well–proof–is a bit iffy at best.
More:
But of course leaving no way to convey that absolute proof to others. There is no shortcut, no Tower of Babel. The only trick is sincerity, and that takes a while (we have so many other desires that demand our attention).
……………………..
Honesty is important in proving something, certainly. You can believe anything you want, though, with proof or without.
We have gotten pretty far off-topic here, though, so I will likely leave this subject here.
Thank you for your replies.
Shastra says
No didn’t swallow most of indian continent that’s a lie propagated by muslim media. His empire doesn’t even constitute 50% of current India. Even during his time maharana pratap from small independent kingdom had became nightmare to Mughals. Muslims called Hindu warriors as personification of death. Most of non Hindus seeing the soft side of hindus think they were weak. If hindus were weak by now India would be Islamic country. Hindu Marathas had already finished the Mughals and other Islamic empire’s. Until the Christian Europeans interfered and everything fell to ruin. Islamists stayed in India thanks to Christian Brits and their indian coolies.
gravenimage says
I never said that Hindus were weak, and I very much lament Muslims having taken over so much of India.
Here’s a map of the greatest extent of the Muslim Mughal Empire:
https://cdn.britannica.com/07/1607-050-124B2853/Development-Mughal-Empire.jpg
This does indeed cover most of the subcontinent, save for Sri Lanka and a tiny bit of land south of the Kaveri River.
gravenimage says
No one talks about Hindu children brutalized by Muslims in India
………………
These Islamic horrors against Hindu children are something *everyone* should know about.
Boromir's Horn says
Absolutely gi, sadly the msm is so prejudiced they won’t even protect children, unless of course, these Hindu children were being persecuted by Christians.
It just make me sick!
gravenimage says
I know how you feel, Boromir’s Horn.
Pavithra Asir says
Neither does anyone want to talk about how Hindus treat Christians in India.
Boromir's Horn says
Christians wear the footprints of all walks of society
commonsense says
I loathe Islam…and, yes…Muslims.
OTTER says
To be an ‘Islamophobe’ is not a phobia, it is an absolute rational necessity of the time. Self defense is the first law of nature. Islam and Muslims will have to be dealt with the firmly, severely and finally once and for all.
The fact that they get away with these kinds of acts is the greatest moral mystery of all times. How is it that millions of people around the world are unable or unwilling to stand up the real character of Islam?
The problem with Islam is simple. It is evil trying to pose is virtue.
nicu says
Sadly this is also no issue in European media who pamper and protect Islam – and those who speak the truth are ” racists ” and ” Nazis ” — wherever they are they kill and rape – old people , children of bot genders and Sheep .